smoker

吸烟者
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:牙周炎是一种影响广泛人群的多因素疾病。然而,其发病机制尚不清楚。miRNA现在被认为是许多炎性疾病的潜在诊断标志物。因此,本研究的目的是评估患有牙周炎的吸烟者和非吸烟者龈沟液(GCF)中microRNA-223(miRNA-223)和microRNA-214(miRNA-214)的表达.
    方法:我们在42名参与者中进行了一项前瞻性研究:14名健康对照,14名非吸烟者牙周炎参与者,和14名患有牙周炎的吸烟者。入选标准是连续的成年人,20-60岁,Ⅲ期牙周炎B/C级,无全身性疾病。所有同意的参与者在诊断后收集牙龈沟液样品,以通过定量实时聚合酶链反应测定评估miRNA-214和-223。
    结果:非吸烟者牙周炎组的ROC曲线分析显示,与miR-223相比,miR-214作为预测因子具有更高的敏感性[92.86%-64.29%]。相同的特异性[100%],曲线下面积显著增加[0.974-0.796](p=0.036)。至于吸烟者牙周炎组,与miR-223相比,以miR-214为预测因子的ROC曲线具有更高的灵敏度[100%-71.43%],相同的特异性[100%],和非显著较高的曲线下面积[1-0.872],分别(p=0.059)。
    结论:miRNA-214和223都是可靠的牙周炎潜在诊断标记,miRNA-214对患有牙周炎的吸烟者更准确。
    结论:miRNA-214和223都可以被考虑用于潜在的椅子侧诊断,通过简单地收集GCF检测疾病的第一步,并帮助防止不可修复的损害。
    OBJECTIVE: Periodontitis is a multifactorial disease that affects a wide range of populations. However, its pathogenesis remains unclear. miRNAs are now considered potential diagnostic markers for many inflammatory diseases. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the expression of microRNA-223(miRNA-223) and microRNA-214 (miRNA-214) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) of smoker and nonsmoker with periodontitis.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective study among 42 participants: 14 healthy controls, 14 nonsmoker periodontitis participants, and 14 smokers with periodontitis. Eligibility criteria for inclusion were consecutive adults, aged 20-60 years, with stage III periodontitis grade B/C and no systemic diseases. All consenting participants had gingival crevicular fluid samples collected after diagnosis to assess miRNA-214 and -223 by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.
    RESULTS: ROC curve analyses for the non-smoker periodontitis group showed that miR-214 as a predictor in comparison to miR-223 had higher sensitivity [92.86%-64.29%], same specificity [100%], and a significantly higher area under the curve [0.974-0.796] respectively (p = 0.036). As for the smoker periodontitis group, a ROC curve with miR-214 as predictor in comparison to miR-223 had higher sensitivity [100%-71.43%], same specificity [100%], and a non-significantly higher area under the curve [1-0.872], respectively (p = 0.059).
    CONCLUSIONS: Both miRNA-214 and 223 are reliable potential diagnostic markers for periodontitis, with miRNA-214 being more accurate for smokers with periodontitis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both miRNA-214 and 223 could be considered for potential chair-side diagnostics, by simply collecting GCF detecting the disease in its first steps and aid in preventing unrepairable damage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国移民在烟草使用方面存在显著差异。针对该群体的文化适应的烟草处理是稀疏的,并且使用是低的。这些治疗计划的使用率较低,这归因于它们专门针对准备退出的个人,以及中国移民在获得这些计划时面临的各种障碍。支持中国移民吸烟者在各个层面做好戒烟准备,并解决他们的准入障碍,我们开发了微信退出教练,一种文化和语言上适当的微信(腾讯控股有限公司)为基础的同行组移动消息戒烟干预。
    目的:本研究旨在评估可行性,可接受性,微信退出教练的初步效果。
    方法:我们于2022年在纽约市共招募了60名中国移民吸烟者,进行了一项先导随机对照试验(RCT)和单臂先导试验。前40名参与者被随机分配到干预组(微信退出教练)或对照组(自助打印材料),使用按性别分层的1:1分组随机分组。微信退出教练持续了6周,由教练主持的小型同伴团体,每日短信与文本问题,以及教练在回答同伴问题时基于聊天的即时消息支持。接下来的20名参与者参加了单臂试点测试,以进一步评估干预的可行性和可接受性。所有60名参与者都接受了为期4周的免费尼古丁替代疗法。在基线和6周进行调查,试验RCT的参与者在6个月时完成一项额外的调查,并在两次随访中对禁欲进行生化验证。
    结果:在接受筛查的74个人中,68人(92%)符合资格,60人(88%)入组。大多数参与者,平均年龄为42.5(SD13.8)岁,是男性(49/60,82%),还没有准备好戒烟,70%(42/60)在登记时处于考虑前或考虑阶段。试验RCT在6周时的随访率为98%(39/40),在6个月时为93%(37/40),而单臂测试在6周时实现了100%的随访。平均而言,参与者在42天的干预期内回答了25.1天的每日文本问题,23%(9/40)的参与者使用了基于聊天的即时消息支持.大多数参与者对微信退出教练感到满意(36/39,92%),并会向其他人推荐(32/39,82%)。6个月时,自我报告的7天点患病率在干预组中为25%(5/20),在控制组中为15%(3/20),生化验证的禁欲率为25%(5/20)和5%(1/20),分别。
    结论:微信戒烟教练是可行的,受到吸烟的中国移民的欢迎,并对禁欲产生了有希望的效果。有必要进行大型试验,以评估其在这一服务不足的人群中促进禁欲的功效。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05130788;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05130788。
    BACKGROUND: Chinese immigrants experience significant disparities in tobacco use. Culturally adapted tobacco treatments targeting this population are sparse and the use is low. The low use of these treatment programs is attributed to their exclusive focus on individuals who are ready to quit and the wide range of barriers that Chinese immigrants face to access these programs. To support Chinese immigrant smokers at all levels of readiness to quit and address their access barriers, we developed the WeChat Quit Coach, a culturally and linguistically appropriate WeChat (Tencent Holdings Limited)-based peer group mobile messaging smoking cessation intervention.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of WeChat Quit Coach.
    METHODS: We enrolled a total of 60 Chinese immigrant smokers in 2022 in New York City for a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) and a single-arm pilot test. The first 40 participants were randomized to either the intervention arm (WeChat Quit Coach) or the control arm (self-help print material) using 1:1 block randomization stratified by sex. WeChat Quit Coach lasted 6 weeks, featuring small peer groups moderated by a coach, daily text messages with text questions, and chat-based instant messaging support from the coach in response to peer questions. The next 20 participants were enrolled in the single-arm pilot test to further assess intervention feasibility and acceptability. All 60 participants were offered a 4-week supply of complimentary nicotine replacement therapy. Surveys were administered at baseline and 6 weeks, with participants in the pilot RCT completing an additional survey at 6 months and biochemical verification of abstinence at both follow-ups.
    RESULTS: Of 74 individuals screened, 68 (92%) were eligible and 60 (88%) were enrolled. The majority of participants, with a mean age of 42.5 (SD 13.8) years, were male (49/60, 82%) and not ready to quit, with 70% (42/60) in the precontemplation or contemplation stage at the time of enrollment. The pilot RCT had follow-up rates of 98% (39/40) at 6 weeks and 93% (37/40) at 6 months, while the single-arm test achieved 100% follow-up at 6 weeks. On average, participants responded to daily text questions for 25.1 days over the 42-day intervention period and 23% (9/40) used the chat-based instant messaging support. Most participants were satisfied with WeChat Quit Coach (36/39, 92%) and would recommend it to others (32/39, 82%). At 6 months, self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence rates were 25% (5/20) in the intervention arm and 15% (3/20) in the control arm, with biochemically verified abstinence rates of 25% (5/20) and 5% (1/20), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: WeChat Quit Coach was feasible and well-received by Chinese immigrants who smoke and produced promising effects on abstinence. Large trials are warranted to assess its efficacy in promoting abstinence in this underserved population.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05130788; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05130788.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的研究表明,虽然小,数字戒烟(SC)干预对癌症幸存者的临床效果。然而,参与者特征之间的关联研究,干预参与,结果是有限的。
    目的:本研究旨在探索MyCourse戒烟的参与和结果的预测因素和调节因素(荷兰语:“MijnKoers-StoppenmetRoken”),针对癌症幸存者的数字最低指导干预。
    方法:对来自随机对照试验的数据进行二次分析。在6个月的随访中,过去7天内吸烟的数量是主要结果指标。我们分析了参与者特征(11个变量)之间的相互作用,干预参与度(3个变量),和使用鲁棒线性(混合)建模的结果。
    结果:总计,165名参与者参与了这项研究。女性参与者获得干预的频率低于男性参与者(B=-11.12;P=.004)。基线时,较高的酒精使用障碍识别测试得分与较高的登录数(B=1.10;P<.001)和日记注册数(B=1.29;P<.001)相关。干预组基线时较高的Fagerström尼古丁依赖评分与6个月后烟草使用量的减少有关(B=-9.86;P=0.002)。没有发现其他关联和调节作用。
    结论:总体而言,参与者特征之间的关联数量有限,订婚,和结果,除了性别,有问题的酒精使用,尼古丁依赖。未来的研究需要阐明如何利用这些知识来改善数字SC计划对癌症幸存者的影响。
    背景:荷兰试用注册NTR6011/NL5434;https://onderzoekmetmensen。nl/nl/试验/22832。
    BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown positive, though small, clinical effects of digital smoking cessation (SC) interventions for cancer survivors. However, research on associations among participant characteristics, intervention engagement, and outcomes is limited.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the predictors and moderators of engagement and outcome of MyCourse-Quit Smoking (in Dutch: \"MijnKoers-Stoppen met Roken\"), a digital minimally guided intervention for cancer survivors.
    METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the randomized controlled trial was performed. The number of cigarettes smoked in the past 7 days at 6-month follow-up was the primary outcome measure. We analyzed interactions among participant characteristics (11 variables), intervention engagement (3 variables), and outcome using robust linear (mixed) modeling.
    RESULTS: In total, 165 participants were included in this study. Female participants accessed the intervention less often than male participants (B=-11.12; P=.004). A higher Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test score at baseline was associated with a significantly higher number of logins (B=1.10; P<.001) and diary registrations (B=1.29; P<.001). A higher Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence score at baseline in the intervention group was associated with a significantly larger reduction in tobacco use after 6 months (B=-9.86; P=.002). No other associations and no moderating effects were found.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, a limited number of associations was found between participant characteristics, engagement, and outcome, except for gender, problematic alcohol use, and nicotine dependence. Future studies are needed to shed light on how this knowledge can be used to improve the effects of digital SC programs for cancer survivors.
    BACKGROUND: Netherlands Trial register NTR6011/NL5434; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/22832.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:利用免费的智能手机应用程序可以帮助扩大基于证据的戒烟干预措施的可用性和使用范围。然而,有必要进行额外的研究,调查如何使用不同的功能,在这样的应用程序影响他们的有效性。
    目的:我们使用从公开可用的戒烟应用程序的实验中收集的观察数据来开发监督机器学习(SML)算法,旨在区分促进成功戒烟的应用程序特征。然后,我们评估了应用程序功能使用模式在多大程度上解释了其他已知的停止预测因素无法解释的停止差异(例如,烟草使用行为)。
    方法:数据来自一项实验(ClinicalTrials.govNCT04623736),该实验测试了美国国家癌症研究所退出START应用程序中激励生态瞬时评估的影响。参与者(N=133)应用程序活动,包括他们在应用程序中采取的每一个行动及其相应的时间戳,被记录下来。在实验开始时测量了人口统计学和基线烟草使用特征,并且在基线后4周测量短期戒烟(7天点患病率戒烟).使用Logistic回归SML建模从28个变量中估计参与者停止的概率,这些变量反映了参与者对不同应用特征的使用,指定的实验条件,和电话类型(iPhone[AppleInc]或Android[Google])。首先将SML模型拟合在训练集(n=100)中,然后在保留测试集(n=33)中评估其准确性。在测试集中,似然比检验(n=30)评估是否将SML预测的停止概率添加到包括人口统计学和烟草使用的逻辑回归模型中(例如,polyuse)变量解释了4周停止的额外差异。
    结果:保留测试集中的SML模型的敏感性(0.67)和特异性(0.67)表明,使用不同应用程序特征的个体模式可以合理地预测戒烟。似然比检验表明,逻辑回归,其中包括SML模型预测的概率,在统计学上等同于仅包括人口统计学和烟草使用变量的模型(P=.16)。
    结论:通过SML利用用户数据可以帮助确定最有用的戒烟应用程序的功能。这种方法论方法可以应用于未来的研究,重点是戒烟应用程序的功能,以告知戒烟应用程序的开发和改进。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04623736;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736。
    BACKGROUND: Leveraging free smartphone apps can help expand the availability and use of evidence-based smoking cessation interventions. However, there is a need for additional research investigating how the use of different features within such apps impacts their effectiveness.
    OBJECTIVE: We used observational data collected from an experiment of a publicly available smoking cessation app to develop supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms intended to distinguish the app features that promote successful smoking cessation. We then assessed the extent to which patterns of app feature use accounted for variance in cessation that could not be explained by other known predictors of cessation (eg, tobacco use behaviors).
    METHODS: Data came from an experiment (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736) testing the impacts of incentivizing ecological momentary assessments within the National Cancer Institute\'s quitSTART app. Participants\' (N=133) app activity, including every action they took within the app and its corresponding time stamp, was recorded. Demographic and baseline tobacco use characteristics were measured at the start of the experiment, and short-term smoking cessation (7-day point prevalence abstinence) was measured at 4 weeks after baseline. Logistic regression SML modeling was used to estimate participants\' probability of cessation from 28 variables reflecting participants\' use of different app features, assigned experimental conditions, and phone type (iPhone [Apple Inc] or Android [Google]). The SML model was first fit in a training set (n=100) and then its accuracy was assessed in a held-aside test set (n=33). Within the test set, a likelihood ratio test (n=30) assessed whether adding individuals\' SML-predicted probabilities of cessation to a logistic regression model that included demographic and tobacco use (eg, polyuse) variables explained additional variance in 4-week cessation.
    RESULTS: The SML model\'s sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.67) in the held-aside test set indicated that individuals\' patterns of using different app features predicted cessation with reasonable accuracy. The likelihood ratio test showed that the logistic regression, which included the SML model-predicted probabilities, was statistically equivalent to the model that only included the demographic and tobacco use variables (P=.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: Harnessing user data through SML could help determine the features of smoking cessation apps that are most useful. This methodological approach could be applied in future research focusing on smoking cessation app features to inform the development and improvement of smoking cessation apps.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04623736; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04623736.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:潮气呼吸和肺过度充气期间的呼气流量受限(EFL)已被确定为疾病状态的主要决定性因素,阻塞性肺疾病的预后和治疗反应。
    目的:研究呼气和吸气阻力与电抗之间的δ值,使用呼吸振荡法测量其与阻塞性肺疾病患者的空气滞留和症状的相关性。
    方法:41名受试者(96名患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病[COPD],311患有哮喘,包括30名健康吸烟者和34名健康受试者)。肺活量测定,进行人体体积描记术和呼吸示波测量,并计算呼气和吸气呼吸示波测量值之间的差异(作为delta值).进行有关症状和生活质量的问卷调查。
    结果:与哮喘患者(分别为p<0.0001和p=0.037)和健康受试者(分别为p=0.0004和p=0.012)相比,COPD患者和健康吸烟者在5Hz(R5)时的δ阻力增加。COPD患者的ΔR5-R19值也高于健康受试者(p=0.0001)和哮喘患者(p<0.0001)。与哮喘和健康受试者相比,COPD患者在5Hz(X5)时的δ电抗明显受损(全部p<0.0001)。残余容量和总肺活量的比值与ΔR5之间存在相关性(p=0.0047;r=0.32),ΔR5-R19(p=0.0002;r=0.41)和ΔX5(p<0.0001;r=-0.44),对于所有科目。ΔX5与COPD症状相关,健康吸烟者和哮喘患者。此外,ΔR5与哮喘症状相关。
    结论:EFL在测量外周电阻和电抗的参数中最为突出,并且与空气滞留和气道症状相关。
    BACKGROUND: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during tidal breathing and lung hyperinflation have been identified as major decisive factors for disease status, prognosis and response to therapy in obstructive lung diseases.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the delta values between expiratory and inspiratory resistance and reactance, measured using respiratory oscillometry and its correlation with air trapping and symptoms in subjects with obstructive lung diseases.
    METHODS: Four hundred and seventy-one subjects (96 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], 311 with asthma, 30 healthy smokers and 34 healthy subjects) were included. Spirometry, body plethysmography and respiratory oscillometry measurements were performed and the differences between the expiratory and inspiratory respiratory oscillometry values (as delta values) were calculated. Questionnaires regarding symptoms and quality of life were administered.
    RESULTS: Patients with COPD and healthy smokers had an increased delta resistance at 5 Hz (R5) compared with patients with asthma (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.037, respectively) and healthy subjects (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.012, respectively). Patients with COPD also had higher values of ΔR5-R19 than healthy subjects (p = 0.0001) and patients with asthma (p < 0.0001). Delta reactance at 5 Hz (X5) was significantly more impaired in COPD patients than in asthma and healthy subjects (p < 0.0001 for all). There was a correlation between the ratio of residual volume and total lung capacity and ΔR5 (p = 0.0047; r = 0.32), ΔR5-R19 (p = 0.0002; r = 0.41) and ΔX5 (p < 0.0001; r = -0.44), for all subjects. ΔX5 correlated with symptoms in COPD, healthy smokers and patients with asthma. In addition, ΔR5 correlated with asthma symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: EFL was most prominent in parameters measuring peripheral resistance and reactance and correlated with air trapping and airway symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于智能手机的干预的有效性取决于干预内容的质量和对该内容的暴露程度。基于智能手机的调查完成率往往会随着时间的推移而下降;然而,很少有研究确定了预测长期干预措施下降的变量(例如,26周)。
    目的:本研究旨在确定在为期26周的戒烟试验中,随着时间的推移,调查完成和信息查看的预测因素。
    方法:本研究检查了一项3组试点随机对照试验的数据,该试验涉及吸烟的成年人(N=152),并且在接下来的30天内没有准备好戒烟。182天,两个干预组收到了基于智能手机的早晚信息,这些信息基于戒烟准备情况.对照组每天收到2条与吸烟无关的信息。所有参与者都被提示每周完成26次基于智能手机的调查,以评估吸烟行为。退出尝试,准备退出。合规是以完成每周调查和查看每日信息的百分比来实施的。线性回归和混合效应模型用于识别预测因子(例如,干预组,年龄,和性别)每周调查完成情况和每日信息查看情况,并随着时间的推移而下降。
    结果:样本(平均年龄50,标准差12.5,范围19-75岁;平均受教育年限13.3,标准差1.6,范围10-20岁)为67.8%(n=103)女性,74.3%(n=113)白色,77%(n=117)城市,52.6%(n=80)失业,61.2%(n=93)有心理健康诊断。平均而言,参与者完成了25.5次提示每周调查中的18.3次(71.8%),查看了345.1次提示信息中的207.3次(60.6%)(总共31,503/52,460次).年龄与每周总体调查完成(P=.003)和每日信息查看(P=.02)呈正相关。混合效应模型表明,调查完成率从干预第一周的77%(114/148)下降到干预最后一周的56%(84/150)(P<.001)。这明显受年龄的影响,性别,种族,自治市(即,农村/城市),和就业状况。同样,信息查看从干预第一周的72.3%(1533/2120)下降至干预最后一周的44.6%(868/1946)(P<.001).这种信息观看的下降明显受到年龄的影响,性别,市政当局,就业状况,和教育。
    结论:这项研究证明了基于智能手机的26周戒烟干预措施的可行性。研究结果确定了在调查完成和消息查看下降中显示加速率的亚组。未来的研究应该确定与跨越长干预期的移动健康干预措施保持高水平互动的方法。尤其是在显示干预参与率随时间下降的亚组中.
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03405129;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03405129。
    BACKGROUND: Efficacy of smartphone-based interventions depends on intervention content quality and level of exposure to that content. Smartphone-based survey completion rates tend to decline over time; however, few studies have identified variables that predict this decline over longer-term interventions (eg, 26 weeks).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify predictors of survey completion and message viewing over time within a 26-week smoking cessation trial.
    METHODS: This study examined data from a 3-group pilot randomized controlled trial of adults who smoke (N=152) and were not ready to quit smoking within the next 30 days. For 182 days, two intervention groups received smartphone-based morning and evening messages based on current readiness to quit smoking. The control group received 2 daily messages unrelated to smoking. All participants were prompted to complete 26 weekly smartphone-based surveys that assessed smoking behavior, quit attempts, and readiness to quit. Compliance was operationalized as percentages of weekly surveys completed and daily messages viewed. Linear regression and mixed-effects models were used to identify predictors (eg, intervention group, age, and sex) of weekly survey completion and daily message viewing and decline in compliance over time.
    RESULTS: The sample (mean age 50, SD 12.5, range 19-75 years; mean years of education 13.3, SD 1.6, range 10-20 years) was 67.8% (n=103) female, 74.3% (n=113) White, 77% (n=117) urban, and 52.6% (n=80) unemployed, and 61.2% (n=93) had mental health diagnoses. On average, participants completed 18.3 (71.8%) out of 25.5 prompted weekly surveys and viewed 207.3 (60.6%) out of 345.1 presented messages (31,503/52,460 total). Age was positively associated with overall weekly survey completion (P=.003) and daily message viewing (P=.02). Mixed-effects models indicated a decline in survey completion from 77% (114/148) in the first week of the intervention to 56% (84/150) in the last week of the intervention (P<.001), which was significantly moderated by age, sex, ethnicity, municipality (ie, rural/urban), and employment status. Similarly, message viewing declined from 72.3% (1533/2120) in the first week of the intervention to 44.6% (868/1946) in the last week of the intervention (P<.001). This decline in message viewing was significantly moderated by age, sex, municipality, employment status, and education.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of a 26-week smartphone-based smoking cessation intervention. Study results identified subgroups that displayed accelerated rates in the decline of survey completion and message viewing. Future research should identify ways to maintain high levels of interaction with mobile health interventions that span long intervention periods, especially among subgroups that have demonstrated declining rates of intervention engagement over time.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03405129; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03405129.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    物质使用障碍(SUD)加剧了长发COVID的影响,特别是增加味觉和嗅觉障碍的风险。分析来自TriNetX的回顾性队列数据和超过3300万条记录(2020年1月至2022年12月),这项研究集中于1,512,358名参与者,揭示SUD显着增加了长期COVID患者经历味觉障碍和嗅觉缺失的可能性。结果表明,与对照组相比,SUD患者的感觉障碍发生率更高,老年人和妇女尤其脆弱。发现患有SUD的吸烟者患嗅觉和味觉障碍的风险增加。这些发现强调了早期筛查的重要性,诊断,以及对有SUD病史的长型COVID患者的干预措施,提示临床医生需要监测与感觉功能障碍相关的抑郁和焦虑,以进行全面护理。
    Substance use disorder (SUD) exacerbates the impact of Long-COVID, particularly increasing the risk of taste and olfactory disorders. Analyzing retrospective cohort data from TriNetX and over 33 million records (Jan 2020-Dec 2022), this study focused on 1,512,358 participants, revealing that SUD significantly heightens the likelihood of experiencing taste disturbances and anosmia in Long-COVID sufferers. Results indicated that individuals with SUD face a higher incidence of sensory impairments compared to controls, with older adults and women being particularly vulnerable. Smokers with SUD were found to have an increased risk of olfactory and taste dysfunctions. The findings underscore the importance of early screening, diagnosis, and interventions for Long-COVID patients with a history of SUD, suggesting a need for clinicians to monitor for depression and anxiety linked to sensory dysfunction for comprehensive care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:开放系统电子烟(EC)产品功能,如电池容量,最大输出瓦数,等等,是推动产品成本并可能影响使用模式的主要组件。此外,对产品功能和价格的持续创新和监控将为设计适当的税收政策和产品法规提供关键信息。
    目的:本研究将研究产品功能如何与基于网络的vape商店中出售的设备的价格相关联。
    方法:我们从5个受欢迎的,以美国为基础,2022年4月至8月的基于网络的vape商店检查入门套件,仅限设备的产品,和电子液体容器的产品。我们实现了具有固定存储效应的线性回归模型,以检查设备属性和价格之间的关联。
    结果:EC入门套件或设备因类型而异,MOD的价格远远高于POD和VAPE笔的价格。mod入门套件的价格甚至低于mod设备的价格,这表明mod入门套件在基于网络的vape商店中打折。MOD套件的价格,仅限mod设备的产品,和pod套件随着电池容量和输出功率的增加而增加。对于vape笔,价格与电子液体容器的体积大小呈正相关。另一方面,pod套件的价格与容器数量呈正相关。
    结论:以单位为基础的特定税,因此,将对vape笔或pod系统等低价设备征收更高的税收负担,并对mod设备征收更低的税收负担。对设备征收基于容量或容量的特定税将对容器尺寸较大的vape笔征收更高的税收负担。同时,与批发或零售价格挂钩的从价税将均匀适用于不同类型的设备,这意味着那些具有更高的电池容量和输出瓦数等高级功能的人将面临更高的费率。因此,政策制定者可以按设备类型操纵税率,以阻止某些设备产品的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Open-system electronic cigarette (EC) product features, such as battery capacity, maximum output wattage, and so forth, are major components that drive product costs and may influence use patterns. Moreover, continued innovation and monitoring of product features and prices will provide critical information for designing appropriate taxation policies and product regulations.
    OBJECTIVE: This study will examine how product features are associated with the prices of devices sold in web-based vape shops.
    METHODS: We draw samples from 5 popular, US-based, web-based vape shops from April to August 2022 to examine starter kits, device-only products, and e-liquid container-only products. We implemented a linear regression model with a store-fixed effect to examine the association between device attributes and prices.
    RESULTS: EC starter kits or devices vary significantly by type, with mod prices being much higher than pod and vape pen prices. The prices of mod starter kits were even lower than those of mod devices, suggesting that mod starter kits are discounted in web-based vape shops. The price of mod kits, mod device-only products, and pod kits increased as the battery capacity and output wattage increased. For vape pens, the price was positively associated with the volume size of the e-liquid container. On the other hand, the price of pod kits was positively associated with the number of containers.
    CONCLUSIONS: A unit-based specific tax, therefore, will impose a higher tax burden on lower-priced devices such as vape pens or pod systems and a lower tax burden on mod devices. A volume- or capacity-based specific tax on devices will impose a higher tax burden on vape pens with a larger container size. Meanwhile, ad valorem taxes pegged to wholesale or retail prices would apply evenly across device types, meaning those with advanced features such as higher battery capacities and output wattage would face higher rates. Therefore, policy makers could manipulate tax rates by device type to discourage the use of certain device products.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吸烟仍然是全球可预防死亡的主要原因之一。世界卫生组织的一项全球研究得出结论,每年有超过800万人死于吸烟,烟草消费,和二手烟。最有效的戒烟计划需要个性化的人为干预和昂贵的药物补充,使大多数烟草使用者负担不起或无法获得它们。因此,数字干预为这些传统方法提供了一个有希望的替代方案。然而,当今市场上领先的智能手机应用程序要么没有在临床环境中进行研究,要么无法与昂贵的离线同行的戒烟成功率相提并论。我们想了解QuitSure,Rapidkart在线私人有限公司开发的新型戒烟应用程序,能够弥合这一功效差距,并大规模提供负担得起的有效戒烟。
    目标:我们的目标是对参与进行初步探索,功效,以及基于用户自我报告的体验的QuitSure的安全性。衡量的结果是计划完成,计划完成对吸烟行为的影响,包括自我报告的戒烟结果,和使用该应用程序的负面健康事件。
    方法:在2021年4月1日至2022年2月28日期间在QuitSure应用程序上创建帐户的所有QuitSure注册用户都会收到一份匿名的基于Web的调查。调查结果被添加到他们在应用程序上的参与度数据中,以评估该应用程序作为戒烟干预措施的可行性和有效性。使用描述性统计(频率和百分比)和独立性的χ2检验对数据进行分析。
    结果:总计,完成QuitSure计划的1299名用户提交了调查并满足研究的纳入标准。其中,1286名参与者在填写调查前30天以上完成了该计划,和1040(80.1%,95%CI79.1%-82.6%)的患者在计划完成后至少30天保持了长时间的禁欲。大多数参与者(770/891,86.4%)在提交调查时仍保持禁欲,没有出现任何严重的尼古丁戒断症状。而41.9%(373/891)也没有轻度戒断症状。完成计划前的吸烟量显著影响戒烟率(P<.001),重度吸烟者(>20支/天)的30天延长禁欲率(相对危险度=0.91;95%CI90.0%-96.2%)低于轻度吸烟者。除已知的尼古丁戒断症状外,没有其他不良事件的报道。
    结论:基于网络的调查和队列选择的性质允许广泛的未知偏见。然而,完成该计划的调查受访者的疗效率很高,并以QuitSure戒烟计划的随机对照试验形式提供了进一步调查的案例。
    BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking remains one of the leading causes of preventable death worldwide. A worldwide study by the World Health Organization concluded that more than 8 million people die every year from smoking, tobacco consumption, and secondhand smoke. The most effective tobacco cessation programs require personalized human intervention combined with costly pharmaceutical supplementation, making them unaffordable or inaccessible to most tobacco users. Thus, digital interventions offer a promising alternative to these traditional methods. However, the leading smartphone apps available in the market today have either not been studied in a clinical setting or are unable to match the smoking cessation success rates of their expensive offline counterparts. We would like to understand whether QuitSure, a novel smoking cessation app built by Rapidkart Online Private Limited, is able to bridge this efficacy gap and deliver affordable and effective smoking cessation at scale.
    OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to do an initial exploration into the engagement, efficacy, and safety of QuitSure based on the self-reported experiences of its users. Outcomes measured were program completion, the effect of program completion on smoking behavior, including self-reported cessation outcomes, and negative health events from using the app.
    METHODS: All QuitSure registered users who created their accounts on the QuitSure app between April 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, were sent an anonymized web-based survey. The survey results were added to their engagement data on the app to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of the app as a smoking cessation intervention. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) and the χ2 test of independence.
    RESULTS: In total, 1299 users who had completed the QuitSure program submitted the survey and satisfied the inclusion criteria of the study. Of these, 1286 participants had completed the program more than 30 days before filling out the survey, and 1040 (80.1%, 95% CI 79.1%-82.6%) of them had maintained prolonged abstinence for at least 30 days after program completion. A majority of participants (770/891, 86.4%) who were still maintaining abstinence at the time of submitting the survey did not experience any severe nicotine withdrawal symptoms, while 41.9% (373/891) experienced no mild withdrawal symptoms either. Smoking quantity prior to completing the program significantly affected quit rates (P<.001), with heavy smokers (>20 cigarettes per day) having a lower 30-day prolonged abstinence rate (relative risk=0.91; 95% CI 90.0%-96.2%) compared to lighter smokers. No additional adverse events outside of known nicotine withdrawal symptoms were reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: The nature of web-based surveys and cohort selection allows for extensive unknown biases. However, the efficacy rates of survey respondents who completed the program were high and provide a case for further investigation in the form of randomized controlled trials on the QuitSure tobacco cessation program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:吸烟是银屑病发病和发展的独立和可改变的危险因素;然而,关于吸烟与银屑病治疗效果相关的证据有限.本研究旨在探讨吸烟对上海地区银屑病患者治疗效果的影响。中国。
    方法:纳入上海皮肤病医院2021-2022年的银屑病患者。牛皮癣患者的治疗包括阿维A,甲氨蝶呤,窄带紫外线/benvitimod,和生物制品。使用结构化问卷收集数据,体检,和基线时的疾病严重程度估计,第4周,第八周。从基线到第8周,银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI75)评分降低≥75%被设定为治疗疗效评估的主要结果。使用SAS9.4分析数据。
    结果:本研究共纳入560例银屑病患者,以男性为主(72.9%)。患者平均年龄为48.4岁,其中38.8%是目前的吸烟者,其中5.0%是以前的吸烟者。患者PASI的中位数评分从11.1改变(四分位距,IQR:7.9-16.6)在基线时在第4周和第8周3.1时达到6.2,在第4周和第8周分别有13.8%和47.3%的银屑病患者达到PASI75。Logistic回归显示,不吸烟的患者在第8周时达到PASI75的比例更高。调整后的比值比(AOR)为11.43(95%CI:6.91-18.89),14.14(95%CI:8.27-24.20),与吸烟者相比,非吸烟者和3.05(95%CI:1.20-7.76),当前吸烟者,和以前的吸烟者,分别。此外,前吸烟者的PASI75成绩高于当前吸烟者(AOR=3.37),以及吸烟起始年龄较小的患者,吸烟时间较长,吸烟强度越高,PASI75成绩越低。
    结论:在当前和以前的吸烟者中,吸烟与PASI75成绩呈负相关,以前吸烟者的PASI75成绩高于现在的吸烟者。烟草控制措施的实施有利于改善治疗反应。
    BACKGROUND: Smoking is an independent and modifiable risk factor for the onset and development of psoriasis; however, evidence on the association between tobacco smoking and psoriasis treatment efficacy is limited. This study aimed to explore the influence of smoking on treatment efficacy in a cohort of patients with psoriasis in Shanghai, China.
    METHODS: Patients with psoriasis were recruited from the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital between 2021 and 2022. The treatment for patients with psoriasis includes acitretin, methotrexate, narrow-band ultraviolet/benvitimod, and biologics. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire, physical examination, and disease severity estimation at baseline, week four, and week eight. The achievement of a ≥75% reduction in psoriasis area and severity index (PASI75) score from baseline to week 8 was set as the primary outcome for treatment efficacy estimation. Data were analyzed using SAS 9.4.
    RESULTS: A total of 560 patients with psoriasis were enrolled in this study, who were predominantly males (72.9%). The average age of patients was 48.4 years, and 38.8% of them were current smokers, 5.0% of them were former smokers. The median score of PASI among patients changed from 11.1 (interquartile range, IQR: 7.9-16.6) at baseline to 6.2 at week 4 and 3.1 at week 8, and 13.8% and 47.3% of patients with psoriasis achieved PASI75 at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Logistic regression indicated that patients without tobacco smoking had a higher proportion of PASI75 achievement at week 8. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) was 11.43 (95% CI: 6.91-18.89), 14.14 (95% CI: 8.27-24.20), and 3.05 (95% CI: 1.20-7.76) for non-smokers compared with smokers, current smokers, and former smokers, respectively. Moreover, former smokers had higher PASI75 achievement than current smokers (AOR=3.37), and patients with younger smoking initiation age, longer smoking duration, and higher smoking intensity had lower PASI75 achievement.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco smoking was negatively associated with PASI75 achievement both in current and former smokers, and former smokers had higher PASI75 achievement than current smokers. The implementation of tobacco control measures is beneficial for improving treatment responses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号