{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
{Author}: Marcolin P;Bueno Motter S;Brandão GR;Lima DL;Oliveira Trindade B;Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo S;
{Journal}: Hernia
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jul 11
{Factor}: 2.92
{DOI}: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w
{Abstract}: <B>BACKGROUND: </B>Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7 cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.