self-care activities

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,正在全球范围内发展。据估计,巴西有1570万年龄在20至79岁之间的人患有糖尿病,大多数病例是2型糖尿病(T2D)。为了成功管理糖尿病,患者需要开展自我保健活动。然而,对巴西T2D患者进行的自我保健活动的了解有限。
    目的:本研究旨在确定和绘制评估巴西T2D自我护理活动的研究。
    方法:这是根据JoannaBriggs研究所的方法指南构建的范围审查方案。使用了六个数据库和灰色文献。搜索的过程,识别,由两名独立审稿人对论文进行评估,由乔安娜·布里格斯研究所建立的假设指导。我们试图回答以下指导性问题:巴西如何评估T2D患者的自我护理活动?我们包括任何语言的论文和出版物,从公共和私有领域,用不同的方法。
    结果:初始数据库搜索共产生681个结果。这些论文将被批判性地分析,并提取相关信息。审查的论文的定量和定性结果将被提交,以回应研究的目标。我们打算在2024年上半年发布范围审查。
    结论:本次范围审查的方案将评估巴西成人和老年人的主要自我护理活动。结果可能有助于确定知识差距,并有助于未来的研究和糖尿病教育干预。
    DERR1-10.2196/49105。
    BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that is growing worldwide. It is estimated that 15.7 million people aged between 20 and 79 years live with diabetes in Brazil, and the majority of cases are type 2 diabetes (T2D). To successfully manage diabetes, the patient needs to develop self-care activities. However, there is limited understanding of what self-care activities are performed by people with T2D in Brazil.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify and map studies that evaluate self-care activities in T2D in Brazil.
    METHODS: This is a scoping review protocol structured according to the methodological guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute. Six databases and gray literature were used. The process of searching, identifying, and evaluating the papers was carried out by 2 independent reviewers, guided by the assumptions established by the Joanna Briggs Institute. We sought to answer the following guiding question: How are self-care activities for people with T2D evaluated in Brazil? We included papers and publications in any language, from public and private domains, and with different methodological approaches.
    RESULTS: Initial database searches produced a total of 681 results. These papers will be critically analyzed, and relevant information will be extracted. Quantitative and qualitative results of the papers reviewed will be presented to respond to the study\'s objective. We intend to publish the scoping review in the first half of 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: The protocol for this scoping review will evaluate the main self-care activities carried out by adults and older people with T2D in Brazil. The results may help identify knowledge gaps and contribute to future research and diabetes education interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/49105.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康教练可有效改善高血压患者的自我护理活动和血压(BP)控制。在发展中国家,关于健康教练对患有不受控制的高血压的初级保健患者的影响的研究有限。在这项研究中,与埃及的标准治疗相比,在未控制高血压的患者中评估了健康指导对高血压自我护理和BP控制的有效性.
    方法:我们的准实验研究包括对照组和干预组。干预组包括70名参与者,除了标准护理外,他们还接受了健康辅导(面对面和电话)。而对照组包括仅接受标准护理的71名参与者.该研究于2020年7月至2021年11月进行。参与者来自塞得港省的三个初级医疗机构。个人和病史,BP测量,并获得高血压自我护理活动水平效应(H-SCALE)。采用配对t检验评估BP测量值的变化,以及接受健康指导前后的H-SCALE评分。McNemar检验用于评估对照组和健康教练组之间受控BP和最佳高血压自我护理活动的变化。多元logistic回归分析评估了血压控制较好的预测因素。
    结果:健康教练使血压得到更多控制(51.4%,P<0.001)与仅常规护理的交付相比(11.3%,P=0.008)。干预对高血压自护活动有明显的促进作用,包括药物使用(P<0.001),低盐饮食(P<0.001),和体重管理(P<0.001)。干预组6个月后,H-SCALE评分均值变化是BP控制的唯一预测因子(比值比1.057,P=0.048)。
    结论:包括传统的健康指导和电话在内的干预措施对于促进未控制高血压的初级保健患者的高血压自我护理和改善血压控制是一种有益的方式。
    BACKGROUND: Health coaching effectively improves hypertension self-care activities and the control of blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients. Studies on the effects of health coaching on patients in primary care with uncontrolled hypertension in developing countries are limited. In this study, the effectiveness of health coaching on hypertension self-care and BP control was assessed in patients who have uncontrolled hypertension compared to standard care in Egypt.
    METHODS: Our quasi-experimental study included control and intervention groups. The intervention group included 70 participants who received health coaching sessions (face-to-face and by telephone) besides the standard care, whereas the control group included 71 participants who only received the standard care. The study was conducted between July 2020 and November 2021. The participants were recruited from three primary healthcare settings in the Port Said Governorate. Personal and medical history, BP measurements, and hypertension self-care activity level effects (H-SCALE) were obtained. Paired-t-test was used to assess the changes in BP measurement, and H-SCALE score before and after receiving the health coaching. McNemar\'s test was used to assess changes in controlled BP and optimal hypertension self-care activities between control and health coached groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis assessed the predictors of better BP control.
    RESULTS: Health coaching resulted in more controlled BP (51.4%, P < 0.001) compared to the delivery of only usual care (11.3%, P = 0.008). The intervention showed a significant promotion in hypertension self-care activities, including medication usage (P < 0.001), low-salt diet (P < 0.001), and weight management (P < 0.001). The H-SCALE score mean change was the only predictor for BP control (odds ratio 1.057, P = 0.048) in the intervention group after 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intervention including traditional health coaching and phone calls is a beneficial modality for the promotion of hypertension self-care and improvement of BP control in primary care patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在2型糖尿病控制中,自我管理是降低并发症发生风险和提高生活质量的有效途径。自我决定理论(SDT)提出了一个有前途的解释框架来预测与自我管理特别相关的自我调节行为。本研究旨在探讨SDT构建体是否会影响2型糖尿病患者的自我管理和控制糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)水平。
    方法:这项横断面研究于2022年8月至12月在Zahedan的两家糖尿病诊所进行。该研究包括300名2型糖尿病患者。数据收集是使用研究人员管理的问卷进行的,其中包括人口统计数据,糖尿病自我护理活动,和包括自主支持在内的自决结构,自主动机,和感知能力。
    结果:自我护理活动总分的平均值为34.62±11.86,最高为70分。在社会经济状况的第四季度(最富有)患者的平均自我护理得分最高(P=0.003)。饮食得分与感知能力之间存在显着关系(P=0.009)。知觉能力(P<0.001)和控制自我调节(P<0.001)是糖尿病患者运动评分的预测因子。独立自我调节(P<0.001,r=0.21)和整体自我调节(P=0.001,r=0.19)与血糖检测得分显著相关。足部护理评分与感知能力(P=0.048,r=0.11)和自主支持(P=0.013,r=0.14)之间存在显着关系。多元回归分析显示运动是HbA1c的预测因子(P=0.014)。
    结论:运动对于实现良好的个体化血糖控制和降低糖尿病并发症的风险至关重要。研究结果为2型糖尿病患者自我护理活动的决定因素提供了有价值的见解,并强调了解决社会经济差异的干预措施的必要性。增强感知能力,并提供自主性支持,以改善糖尿病的自我护理。
    OBJECTIVE: In type 2 diabetes control, self-management is an effective way to minimize the risk of developing complications and improve the quality of life. Self-determination theory (SDT) proposed a promising explanatory framework to predict self-regulated behavior which was particularly relevant for self-management. This study aimed to investigate whether SDT constructs can affect the self-management and controlling glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in type 2 diabetic patients or not.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from August to December 2022 at two diabetes clinics in Zahedan. The study included 300 patients with type 2 diabetes. Data collection was done using a researcher-administrated questionnaire that included demographic data, diabetes self-care activities, and self-determination constructs including autonomous support, autonomous motivation, and perceived competence.
    RESULTS: The mean of the overall score of self-care activities was 34.62 ± 11.86 out of a maximum of 70. Patients in the fourth quarter (wealthiest) of the socioeconomic status had the highest mean self-care score (P = 0.003). There was a significant relationship between diet score with perceived competence (P = 0.009). Perceived competence (P<0.001) and controlled self-regulation (P<0.001) were the predictors of exercise score in diabetes patients. Independent self-regulation (P<0.001, r = 0.21) and overall self-regulation (P = 0.001, r = 0.19) were significantly related to blood-glucose testing score. There was a significant relationship between foot care score with perceived competence (P = 0.048, r = 0.11) and autonomous support (P = 0.013, r = 0.14). Multiple regression showed that exercise was the predictor of HbA1c (P = 0.014).
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise is crucial for achieving good individualized glycemic control and reducing the risk of diabetes complications. The findings provided valuable insights into the determinants of self-care activities in patients with type 2 diabetes and underscore the need for interventions that address socioeconomic disparities, enhance perceived competence, and provide autonomy support to improve diabetes self-care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病(DM)是主要的,非常普遍,挑战公共卫生问题。2型糖尿病自我护理欠佳可导致血糖控制不佳,并发症,甚至死亡。
    这项研究调查了II型糖尿病患者的痛苦发生率及其与自我护理习惯的联系。
    相关关系,本研究采用横断面设计和200例患者的方便样本.进行了三份问卷:(A)人口统计学和医学数据问卷;(B)糖尿病自我护理活动;(C)阿拉伯语的糖尿病困扰量表。
    患者的平均年龄为51.78±11.34;80%的患者实行较低水平的糖尿病自我护理,37%的人患有高水平的糖尿病。自我护理与糖尿病困扰相关(R=-0.152,p值=.032)。
    自我护理活动有助于糖尿病患者的早期发现和治疗。持续的自我保健教育有望最大程度地减少糖尿病困扰。糖尿病困扰和自我护理之间关联的潜在优势可以提供自我护理计划,从而增强糖尿病困扰管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a main, highly prevalent, and challenging public health issue. Suboptimal self-care for type II diabetes can lead to poor glycemic control, complications, and even death.
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigated the incidence of distress and its link with self-care habits of patients with diabetes type II.
    UNASSIGNED: A correlational, cross-sectional design with a convenient sample of 200 patients was used to conduct this study. Three questionnaires were administered: (A) the demographic and medical data questionnaire; (B) diabetes self-care activities in brief; and (C) the diabetes distress scale in Arabic language.
    UNASSIGNED: The patients\' mean age was 51.78 ± 11.34; 80% of patients practiced lower levels of diabetes self-care, and 37% of them had a high level of diabetes distress. Self-care is associated with diabetes distress (R = -0.152, p-value = .032).
    UNASSIGNED: Self-care activities can help in the early detection and management of diabetes distress. Sustained self-care education is promising to minimize diabetes distress. The potential advantages of association between diabetes distress and self-care can offer self-care programs that enhance diabetes distress management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:中风是世界上最严重的神经系统问题之一,被认为是导致死亡的主要原因。由于多种药物和多种疾病,卒中患者对药物治疗和自我护理活动的依从性较低.
    未经评估:曾因中风而最近被送往公立医院的患者被招募。在主要研究者和患者之间的访谈期间,使用经过验证的问卷检查了患者对药物的依从性。其中患者对自我护理活动的依从性是使用开发的,验证和以前发布的问卷。从患者那里探讨了缺乏依从性的原因。通过患者的医院档案验证患者的详细信息和药物。
    未经评估:参与者的平均年龄(n=173)为53.21(SD=8.61)岁。评估患者对药物的依从性表明,超过一半的患者表示他们有时/经常忘记服药。而41.0%的人有时/经常不时停止用药。对药物治疗的平均依从性评分(28)为18.39(SD=2.1),83.8%的患者依从性较低。发现没有服用药物的患者是由于健忘(46.8%)和服用药物引起的并发症(20.2%)。更好的坚持与更高的教育水平有关,更多的医疗条件,和更高的血糖监测频率。坚持自我护理活动表明,大多数患者每周进行三次正确的自我护理活动。
    未经评估:沙特阿拉伯的卒中后患者表示药物依从性较低,同时报告他们对自我护理活动的良好依从性。更好的依从性与某些患者特征有关,例如更高的教育水平。这些发现可以帮助将来集中精力改善中风患者的依从性和健康结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Stroke is one of the most significant neurological problems around the world, and is considered a leading cause of death. Due to polypharmacy and multimorbidity, stroke patients are susceptible to have lower levels of adherence to their medications and self-care activities.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who have suffered a stroke and had recently been admitted to public hospital were approached for recruitment. Patients\' adherence to their medications was examined using a validated questionnaire during an interview between the principal investigator and the patients, where patients\' adherence to their self-care activities was assessed using a developed, validated and previously published questionnaire as well. Reasons for lack of adherence was explored from the patients. Verification of patient\'s details and medications was done via the patient\'s hospital file.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean age of the participants (n=173) was 53.21 (SD= 8.61) years. Assessing patients\' adherence to medications showed that more than half of them stated that they sometimes/often forgot to take their medication/s, while 41.0% sometimes/often stopped their medication/s from time to time. The mean adherence to medications score (out of 28) was 18.39 (SD=2.1), with 83.8% having a low adherence level. It is found that patients who did not take their medications were due to forgetfulness (46.8%) and complications from taking the medications (20.2%). Better adherence was associated with higher educational level, higher number of medical conditions, and higher frequency of glucose monitoring. Adherence to self-care activities showed that majority of patients performed correct self-care activities three times a week.
    UNASSIGNED: Post-stroke patients in Saudi Arabia have indicated low levels of medication adherence, while reporting good adherence to their self-care activities. Better adherence was associated with certain patient characteristics such as higher educational level. These findings can help in focusing the efforts to improve adherence and health outcomes for stroke patients in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用数字技术远程评估患者可以降低临床研究成本。在欧盟,处方药包装上的2D矩阵代码用作给定药物包装的唯一标识符,因此,也是接受药物治疗的患者。因此,2D矩阵码的扫描可允许临床研究中的远程患者认证。
    目的:DePRO研究的目的是评估全数字化数据采集工作流程的可行性。通过药物包装2D矩阵码认证参与者,在使用二甲双胍的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中。主要目的是描述这些患者的自我护理活动。次要目标是评估(1)这些患者的自我报告健康状况,(2)自我护理活动与人口统计学和疾病特征的关联,和(3)我的EPRO应用程序的可用性。
    方法:DePRO是一种观察性的,多中心,横截面,数字,以及2020年6月至12月在德国进行的患者驱动研究。服用二甲双胍的成年患者被邀请通过其药剂师或药物追踪器应用程序参与。参与者将我的ePRO应用程序下载到他们自己的移动设备上,扫描他们的二甲双胍包装上的2D矩阵代码进行注册和认证,并通过电子形式提供知情同意书。然后,他们能够完成关于人口统计学和临床特征的研究特定问卷,德文版糖尿病自我护理活动措施摘要(SDSCA-G),糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ),还有EQ-5D-5L.患者在没有医疗保健专业人员支持的情况下进行了研究。统计分析是探索性和描述性的。
    结果:总计,3219名患者被邀请参加。药剂师邀请的患者中同意的比例(19/217,8.8%)高于通过药物跟踪器应用程序邀请的患者(13/3002,0.4%)。在符合分析条件的29名患者中,28人(97%)完成了所有研究问卷。大多数患者(23/29,79%)年龄<60岁,59%(17/29)为男性。患者在7天中平均总共花费3.5天(SD1.3)进行自我护理活动(SDSCA-G)。大多数患者(24/29,83%)对他们目前的治疗(DTSQ)感到非常满意。29名患者中有20名(69%)报告了感知到的高血糖或低血糖事件。28名患者中有18名(64%)报告了最佳的健康状况(EQ-5D-5L)。年龄与一般饮食和特定饮食的时间呈正相关(斯皮尔曼系数分别为0.390和0.434)。
    结论:DePRO研究证明了在T2DM患者中进行全数字认证(通过药物包装上的2D矩阵代码)和数据采集的可行性。个人邀请比通过药物跟踪器应用程序进行的远程邀请产生更高的招聘率。实现了较高的问卷完成率,根据29名患者中的28名完成。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04383041;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04383041。
    未经评估:RR2-10.2196/21727。
    BACKGROUND: The use of digital technology to assess patients remotely can reduce clinical study costs. In the European Union, the 2D matrix code on prescription drug packaging serves as a unique identifier of a given package of medication, and thus, also of the patient receiving that medication. Scanning of the 2D matrix code may therefore allow remote patient authentication in clinical studies.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the DePRO study was to assess the feasibility of a fully digital data-capture workflow, the authentication of participants via drug packaging 2D matrix codes, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who use metformin. The primary objective was to describe the self-care activities of these patients. Secondary objectives were to evaluate (1) the self-reported health status of these patients, (2) the association of self-care activities with demographics and disease characteristics, and (3) the usability of the my ePRO app.
    METHODS: DePRO was an observational, multicenter, cross-sectional, digital, and patient-driven study conducted in Germany from June to December 2020. Adult patients prescribed metformin were invited to participate via their pharmacist or a medication tracker app. Participants downloaded the my ePRO app onto their own mobile device, scanned the 2D matrix code on their metformin package for registration and authentication, and provided informed consent via an electronic form. They were then able to complete a study-specific questionnaire on demographics and clinical characteristics, the German version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA-G), the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), and the EQ-5D-5L. The patients conducted the study without support from a health care professional. Statistical analyses were exploratory and descriptive.
    RESULTS: In total, 3219 patients were invited to participate. The proportion of patients giving consent was greater among those invited by pharmacists (19/217, 8.8%) than among those invited via the medication tracker app (13/3002, 0.4%). Of the 29 patients eligible for analysis, 28 (97%) completed all study questionnaires. Most of the patients (23/29, 79%) were aged <60 years, and 59% (17/29) were male. The patients spent a mean total of 3.5 (SD 1.3) days out of 7 days on self-care activities (SDSCA-G). Most patients (24/29, 83%) were satisfied to extremely satisfied with their current treatment (DTSQ). Events of perceived hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia were reported by 20 of 29 (69%) patients. The best possible health status (EQ-5D-5L) was reported by 18 of 28 (64%) patients. Age was positively correlated with time spent on general and specific diet (Spearman coefficient 0.390 and 0.434, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The DePRO study demonstrates the feasibility of fully digital authentication (via 2D matrix codes on drug packaging) and data capture in patients with T2DM. Personal invitations yielded higher recruitment rates than remote invitations via the medication tracker app. A high questionnaire completion rate was realized, based on completion by 28 out of 29 patients.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04383041; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04383041.
    UNASSIGNED: RR2-10.2196/21727.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自我护理活动与II型糖尿病患者的预后相关,包括服药依从性,饮食依从性,身体活动,自我血糖监测(SMBG),和适当的足部护理。患者家属的行为会影响患者的自我保健活动,但是关于这种关联的数据很少。这项研究的目的是评估II型糖尿病患者家庭成员的行为与患者的自我护理活动之间的关联程度。
    方法:我们在加德满都的教学医院进行了一项横断面研究,尼泊尔,并采访了411名2型糖尿病门诊患者。我们使用探索性因素分析将家庭成员的行为分为3个领域(“专制,\"\"支持,\"和\"计划\"行为),并将行为级别分为3类(\"高\"与\"medium\"vs.\"low\")根据其在每个域中的排名分布。我们使用带有Bonferroni校正的多变量逻辑回归评估了家庭行为领域与自我护理活动之间的关联。
    结果:高(与低)支持行为水平与SMBG依从性相关(58%vs.11%;调整后比值比[OR]=7.44;95%置信区间[CI]=2.41,23.01)。高(vs.低)计划行为水平与高水平的足部护理依从性相关(64%与21%;调整后OR=6.03;95%CI=3.01,12.11)。
    结论:我们发现糖尿病患者家庭成员的行为与患者自身的自我护理行为之间存在关联。然而,家庭行为测量问题与兴趣自我照顾之间的不一致限制了研究结果的含义。
    BACKGROUND: Self-care activities are associated with prognosis of type-II diabetes mellitus patients and include medication adherence, dietary adherence, physical activity, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and appropriate foot care. The behaviors of a patient\'s family members can influence the patient\'s self-care activities, but little data exist on this association. The objective of this study was to assess the extent of the association between behaviors of family members of Type-II diabetes patients and the patients\' self-care activities.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at a teaching hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal, and interviewed 411 outpatients with Type-2 diabetes mellitus. We used exploratory factor analysis to group family members\' behaviors into 3 domains (\"authoritarian,\" \"supportive,\" and \"planning\" behaviors) and graded the level of the behavior into 3 categories (\"high\" vs. \"medium\" vs. \"low\") according to its ranking distribution in each domain. We assessed the association between domains of family behavior and self-care activities using multivariate logistic regression with Bonferroni correction.
    RESULTS: High (vs. low) level of supportive behavior was associated with compliance to SMBG (58% vs. 11%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] =7.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] =2.41, 23.01). High (vs. low) level of planning behavior was associated with high level of foot care adherence (64% vs. 21%; adjusted OR = 6.03; 95% CI = 3.01, 12.11).
    CONCLUSIONS: We found associations between behaviors of diabetes patients\' family members and the patients\' own self-care behaviors. However, the incongruence between the family behavior measurement questions and the self-care of interest limited the implications of the findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管众所周知,生活方式的改变会影响血浆葡萄糖水平,很少有正式证据表明运动和饮食在糖尿病(DM)管理中的持续有效性。DM中的自我护理是指患者在教育计划中获得的知识的实际应用。目标是改变病人的行为,从而改善血糖控制。我们评估了159例DM患者的DM自我护理活动(SCA)对血糖控制的影响。血浆糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平用于监测血糖控制,而SCA使用标准化糖尿病自我管理问卷(DSMQ)进行评估。在我们的研究中,53%的患者HbA1c≥7%。在单变量线性回归模型中,HbA1c(因变量)与DSMQ饮食控制评分(R2=0.037,p=0.0145)和DSMQSum评分(R2=0.06,p=0.0014)呈统计学显著负相关.与DSMQ总和评分的一个标准偏差(SD)变化相关的HbA1c%的平均绝对变化,独立于压缩多元回归模型中保留的其他重要变量,为-0.419%(置信区间:95%:从-0.18到-0.65)。尽管与多变量模型中的其他自变量相比,DSMQ评分的影响不大,研究结果强调了维持最佳生活方式改变以避免高血糖及其并发症的重要性.总之,强化DM自我管理与改善血糖控制相关.在患有慢性疾病如DM的患者中,由于COVID-19大流行导致全球范围内获得医疗保健的机会显着减少,因此简化包括身体活动和适当饮食选择的SCA的作用至关重要。
    Although it is well known that lifestyle changes can affect plasma glucose levels, there is little formal evidence for the sustained effectiveness of exercise and diet in diabetes mellitus (DM) management. Self-care in DM refers to the real-life application of the knowledge that the patient gained during the education programmes. The goals are to bring about changes in the patient\'s behaviour, thus improving glycaemic control. We evaluated the influence of DM self-care activities (SCA) on glycaemic control in a total of 159 patients with DM. Plasma glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were used to monitor glycaemic control, while SCA were assessed using the standardised Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ). In our study, 53% of the patients had a HbA1c ≥ 7%. In univariate linear regression models, a statistically significant inverse association was observed between the HbA1c (the dependent variable) and both the DSMQ Dietary Control Score (R2 = 0.037, p = 0.0145) and the DSMQ Sum Score (R2 = 0.06, p = 0.0014). The mean absolute change in the HbA1c% associated with one standard deviation (SD) change in the DSMQ Sum Score, independent of the other significant variables retained in the compacted multivariate regression model, was -0.419% (confidence interval: 95%: from -0.18 to -0.65). Although the impact of the DSMQ Score was modest when compared to the other independent variables in the multivariate model, the findings emphasise the importance of maintaining optimal lifestyle changes to avoid hyperglycaemia and its complications. In conclusion, enhanced self-management of DM is associated with improved glucose control. In patients with chronic diseases such as DM, the role of streamlining SCA encompassing physical activity and proper dietary choices is imperative because of a significantly reduced access to healthcare globally as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Diabetes mellitus is a major public health issue that considerably impacts mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has created havoc in diabetes management, too, like other spectrums of life. A descriptive, cross-sectional study was adopted to determine the effect of Social Support, Self-Care Behaviour and Self-Efficacy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D) during this COVID-19 pandemic. Two hundred T2D patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were chosen using a convenient sampling procedure. The tool consists of four sections, including socio-demographic characteristics, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), revised Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) Scale and modified Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMS). Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the obtained data. The mean and SD of diabetic management self-efficacy is 5.74 (1.95) and 4.37 (1.4), respectively, for patients with HbA1c < 6.5% and HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. The self-care activities of the patients who had good glycemic control were 4.31 (2.06) compared to 3.50 (1.73) who did not. The social support received by the patients was 6.13 (2.13) vs. 5.31 (1.67) among patients with glycemic control vs. no control. The results show that social support (p = 0.04), self-efficacy (p =0.01) and self-care activities (p = 0.001) were significantly related to the level of glycemic control of the T2D patients. A significant relationship was also identified between gender (p = 0.036), age (p = 0.001) and education status (p = 0.000) with HbA1c control of the participants. This study demonstrates a significant relationship between social support, self-care behaviours, self-efficacy and glycemic management in T2D patients. During this COVID-19 pandemic, interventions to enhance the self-care activities like exercise and social support to boost their self-efficacy; for better diabetes management, reducing diabetes complications or prolonging their onset are the need of the hour.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下肢截肢(LLA)是2型糖尿病(T2DM)的严重后果,并且可以影响多达1%的T2DM患者,导致过早死亡的风险增加。在预测LLA的因素中,它强调了性,婚姻状况,和以前的截肢。然而,缺乏关于这些预测因素之间关联的信息,自我照顾,2型糖尿病患者的急迫性LLA。
    为了验证自我护理的行为,并将其与预测因素(性别,婚姻状况,和先前的截肢)在急迫的LLAT2DM患者中。
    非干预性研究,106名T2DM患者因T2DM引起的并发症而处于术后急迫性LLA。结构化问卷用于样本的社会人口统计学和临床表征以及糖尿病自我护理活动摘要(SDSCA)工具。它是用威尔科克森的,弗里德曼,和曼-惠特尼测试(中位数,非参数群体)来评估群体之间差异的显著性(性别,婚姻状况,和先前的截肢),还使用Spearman相关系数来评估数据之间的关联(诊断时间之间的比较,性别,之前的截肢手术,种族和收缩期动脉高血压)和考虑与性别相关的SDSCA项目的逻辑回归分析,年龄和婚姻状况(与伴侣)。
    当参与者按性别分组时,在问题“特定食物”和“足部护理”中发现了显着差异(p<0.05)。在婚姻状况方面,对于“特定食物”的问题观察到显著差异(p<0.05)。先前有或没有截肢的组之间没有发现差异。
    通过SDSCA工具,我们能够报告提交紧急LLA的T2DM患者在自我护理方面存在差异,特别是性别和婚姻状况。
    UNASSIGNED: Lower limb amputation (LLA) is a severe consequence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and can affect up to 1% of T2DM patients, leading to an increased risk of premature mortality. Among the factors to predict LLA, it has been highlighted sex, marital status, and previous amputation. However, there is a lack of information about the association between these predictive factors, self-care, and urgency LLA in T2DM patients.
    UNASSIGNED: To verify the behavior of self-care and to relate it with the predictive factors (sex, marital status, and previous amputation) in urgency LLA T2DM patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Non-interventional study, with 106 T2DM patients who were in the postoperative period of urgency LLA caused by complications resulting from T2DM. A structured questionnaire was used for sociodemographic and clinical characterization of the sample as well as the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) tool. It was used the Wilcoxon, Friedman, and Mann-Whitney tests (median, nonparametric populations) to assess the significance of the differences between groups (sex, marital status, and previous amputation), also Spearman correlation coefficient to assess the association between the data (comparison between diagnostic time, sex, previous amputation, ethnicity and systolic arterial hypertension) and a logistic regression analysis considering the item SDSCA related to sex, age and marital status (with partner).
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences (p<0.05) in the questions \"Specific Food\" and \"Foot care\" were found when the participants were grouped by sex. In the relation to marital status, significant differences (p<0.05) were observed for the question \"Specific Food\". No differences were found between groups with or without previous amputation.
    UNASSIGNED: By SDSCA tool, we were able to report that T2DM patients submitted to urgency LLA presented differences in self-care, particularly for sex and marital status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号