ropivacaine

罗哌卡因
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经证明了竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)在后路开放腰椎手术中的有效性和可靠性;但是,很少有关于腰椎ESPB(L-ESPB)在腰椎单侧双门内窥镜(UBE)手术中的随机对照试验报道.
    方法:共120例患者,年龄在18~65岁(在全身麻醉下接受了选择性腰椎UBE手术,美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况为I~III)以1:1的比例随机分为ESPB组和对照组.ESPB组进行超声(US)引导单侧单次注射0.25%罗哌卡因L-ESPB,但不在对照组。所有患者的术后镇痛策略:患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA,手术后立即开始与口服复方磷酸可待因和布洛芬缓释片(1片含有布洛芬200mg和可待因13mg,1片/q12h)术后6h开始。我们收集并比较了以患者为中心的术中和术后48小时的相关性。主要结果是术中和术后阿片类药物的消耗和术后恢复质量15(QoR-15)评分。
    结果:与对照组(n=56)相比,ESPB组(n=58)显着降低了术中瑞芬太尼的消耗量(估计中位数差异-280mcg,95%置信区间[CI]-360至-200,p<0.001,功率=100%);术后24小时显着减少芬太尼的消耗(估计中位数差异-80mcg,95%[CI]-128至-32,p=0.001,功率=90%);并在术后24小时显着提高了QoR-15评分(估计中位数差异11,95%[CI]8至14,p<0.001,功率=100%)。与对照组相比,ESPB组提高静息数字评定量表(NRS)评分,直至术后8小时,术后4小时内主动运动NRS评分。术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率(p=0.015,功率=70%),腹胀(p=0.024,功率=64%),ESPB组的小腿肌肉静脉血栓形成(MCVT)(p=0.033,功率=58%)低于对照组。此外,本文未发现L-ESPB相关不良反应的发生。
    结论:美国指导的L-ESPB减少了术中和术后24h的阿片类药物消耗,并改善了患者术后24h的QoR-15评分。L-ESPB可以安全有效地应用于腰椎UBE手术。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2200061908,注册日期:2022年7月10日。注册表URL。
    BACKGROUND: The efficacy and reliability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior open lumbar spine surgery has been demonstrated; however, few randomized controlled trials of lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) in lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic (UBE) surgery have been reported.
    METHODS: A total of 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 (who underwent elective lumbar UBE surgery under general anesthesia and exhibited an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ESPB group and the Control group. Ultrasound(US)-guided unilateral single-shot 0.25% ropivacaine L-ESPB was performed in the ESPB group, but not in the control group. Postoperative analgesic strategy for all patients: patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA, diluted and dosed with fentanyl alone) was initiated immediately after surgery combined with oral compound codeine phosphate and ibuprofen sustained release tablets (1 tablet containing ibuprofen 200 mg and codeine 13 mg, 1 tablet/q12h) commenced 6 h postoperatively. We collected and compared patient-centred correlates intraoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores.
    RESULTS: Compared to the control group (n = 56), the ESPB group (n = 58) significantly reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption (estimated median difference - 280 mcg, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 360 to - 200, p < 0.001, power = 100%); significantly reduced fentanyl consumption at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference - 80mcg, 95%[CI] - 128 to - 32, p = 0.001, power = 90%); and significantly enhanced the QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference 11, 95%[CI] 8 to 14, p < 0.001, power = 100%). Compared to the control group, the ESPB group enhanced the resting numeric rating scale (NRS) score up to 8 h postoperatively, and the active movement NRS score up to 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p = 0.015, power = 70%), abdominal distension (p = 0.024, power = 64%), and muscular calf vein thrombosis (MCVT) (p = 0.033, power = 58%) was lower in the ESPB group than in the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of L-ESPB related adverse reactions was not found herein.
    CONCLUSIONS: US-guided L-ESPB reduces intraoperative and 24 h postoperative opioid consumption and improves patients\' QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively. L-ESPB can be safely and effectively utilized in lumbar UBE surgery.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061908 , date of registration: 10/07/2022. Registry URL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氢吗啡酮与罗哌卡因联合应用于超声引导下的竖脊肌平面阻滞可增强乳腺手术患者的术后镇痛效果并降低白细胞介素-6的表达。
    方法:在本研究中,乳腺癌改良根治术患者随机分为3组(每组30例):标准一般(C组),罗哌卡因平立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)(R组),和ESPB与罗哌卡因加氢吗啡酮(HR组)。诊断:乳腺癌患者。手术后,疼痛程度,IL-6,麻醉剂量,额外的镇痛需求,和恢复里程碑进行比较,以评估ESPB增强的疗效.
    结果:3组基线特征无显著差异,操作时间,术后恶心的例数,和T1时(手术后返回病房的时间)的血清IL-6浓度。在T2(手术后第二天早上6:00),HR组血清IL-6浓度显著低于R组和C组(P<0.05);舒芬太尼,HR和R组的丙泊酚明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR和R组的视觉模拟评分在T3(术后4小时)明显降低,T4(术后12小时),和T5(术后24小时)高于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组接受术后镇痛的患者比例明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组术后恶心的患者比例明显低于C组(P<0.05);HR组和R组术后第一次肛门排气时间和术后第一次下床活动时间明显短于C组(P<0.05)。
    结论:氢吗啡酮复合罗哌卡因对全麻下MRM患者的术后镇痛效果更好。联合镇痛引起的不良反应少,抑制炎症因子IL-6的表达水平,从而促进术后恢复。使用氢吗啡酮和罗哌卡因的ESPB改善MRM后疼痛控制,减少不利影响,更有效地抑制IL-6,促进恢复。
    BACKGROUND: Combining hydromorphone with ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane blocks enhances postoperative analgesia and reduces interleukin-6 expression in breast surgery patients.
    METHODS: In this study, breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy were randomized into 3 groups for anesthesia (30 patients in each group): standard general (group C), Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) with ropivacaine (group R), and ESPB with ropivacaine plus hydromorphone (group HR). Diagnosis: Breast cancer patients. Postsurgery, pain levels, IL-6, anesthetic doses, additional analgesia needs, and recovery milestones were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the ESPB enhancements.
    RESULTS: The 3 groups were not significantly different in baseline characteristics, operation time, number of cases with postoperative nausea, and serum IL-6 concentrations at T1 (the time of being returned to the ward after surgery). At T2 (at 6:00 in the next morning after surgery), the serum IL-6 concentration in group HR was significantly lower than that in groups R and C (P < .05); the intraoperative doses of remifentanil, sufentanil, and propofol were significantly lower in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05); Groups HR and R had significantly lower visual analog scale scores at T3 (4 hours postoperatively), T4 (12 hours postoperatively), and T5 (24 hours postoperatively) than those in group C (P < .05); the proportions of patients receiving postoperative remedial analgesia were significantly lower in groups HR and R than in group C (P < .05); groups HR and R had significantly lower proportions of patients with postoperative nausea than group C (P < .05); the time to the first anal exhaust and the time to the first ambulation after surgery were significantly shorter in groups HR and R than those in group C (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hydromorphone combined with ropivacaine for ESPB achieved a greater postoperative analgesic effect for patients receiving MRM under general anesthesia. The combined analgesia caused fewer adverse reactions and inhibited the expression level of the inflammatory factor IL-6 more effectively, thereby facilitating postoperative recovery. ESPB using hydromorphone with ropivacaine improved pain control post-MRM, reduced adverse effects, and more effectively suppressed IL-6, enhancing recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在电化学疗法(ECT)期间,将化疗药物注射到肿瘤中,然后提供电穿孔。在马,操纵耳朵可能会非常痛苦,将局部区域技术与镇静相结合可能是避免麻醉相关风险的好选择。在马尸体中描述了内部和外部耳廓和耳道的两个注射点阻滞,它允许耳大神经(GAN)的所有三个分支完全染色,耳内神经支(IAB),耳外支(LAB),和尾耳神经(CAN),提示IAB和LAB阻滞期间腮腺内注射的风险较低。
    一名8岁的意大利跳跃者接受ECT治疗,以治疗左内侧耳廓的成纤维细胞结节病。用乙酰丙嗪静脉镇静后,罗米菲丁,和布托啡诺,如前所述,提供了两个注入点的块。GAN的街区是盲人,而电神经定位器用于IAB,实验室,和可以。总共注射12ml的0.5%罗哌卡因。安全地进行了ECT,没有任何困难。马很好地耐受该程序并且在镇静后75分钟完全恢复。未发现并发症。
    所描述的方法似乎是可行的,并且适用于在ECT的情况下阻断马耳的感觉神经支配。
    UNASSIGNED: During electrochemotherapy (ECT), a chemotherapeutic drug is injected into the tumor and then an electroporation is provided. In horses, ear manipulation may be very painful, and combining a loco-regional technique with sedation might be a good option to avoid anesthesia-related risks. A two-injection-point block of the internal and external pinna and acoustic meatus was described in horse cadavers, and it permitted complete stain of all three branches of the great auricular nerve (GAN), internal auricular nerve branch (IAB), lateral auricular branch (LAB), and caudal auricular nerve (CAN), suggesting a lower risk of intra-parotid injection during the IAB and LAB block.
    UNASSIGNED: An 8-year-old Italian jumping gelding presented for ECT to treat a fibroblastic sarcoid in the left medial pinna. After intravenous sedation with acepromazine, romifidine, and butorphanol, a two-injection-point block was provided as previously described. The block of the GAN was blind, whereas an electrical nerve locator was used for the IAB, LAB, and CAN. A total of 12 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected. The ECT was safely performed without any difficulties. The horse well tolerated the procedure and completely recovered 75 minutes after sedation. No complications were detected.
    UNASSIGNED: The described approach seems feasible and suitable for the blockade of the sensory innervation of the equine ear in the case of ECT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前,为了克服局部麻醉剂罗哌卡因的短半衰期,纳米颗粒和脂质体等药物递送系统已被用于延长镇痛效果,但是它们容易从给药部位突然释放或缓释效果差,在这项研究中增加了心脏毒性的风险,基于罗哌卡因-多库酯钠疏水离子对(HIP)的可注射脂质悬浮液旨在显着延长镇痛持续时间。所得离子配对脂质悬浮液(HIP/LIPO)具有微米级和高ζ电位,这有利于稳定的原位保留。使用热和光谱分析验证了多库酯钠和罗哌卡因之间的强相互作用,微米大小的多晶型囊泡的形成归因于罗哌卡因-多库酯钠HIP之间的相互稳定相互作用,多库酯钠和卵磷脂。HIP/LIPO给药系统可在体外保持药物释放超过5天,在体内达到高镇痛效果超过10天,减少与高剂量药物相关的副作用。稳定的HIP/LIPO递送系统是一种有前途的策略,为术后疼痛管理和其他疾病提供了临床上有益的替代方案。
    Currently, to overcome the short half-life of the local anesthetic ropivacaine, drug delivery systems such as nanoparticles and liposomes have been used to prolong the analgesic effect, but they are prone to abrupt release from the site of administration or have poor slow-release effects, which increases the risk of cardiotoxicity. In this study, injectable lipid suspensions based on ropivacaine-docusate sodium hydrophobic ion pairing (HIP) were designed to significantly prolong the duration of analgesia. The resulting ion-paired lipid suspension (HIP/LIPO) had a micrometer scale and a high zeta potential, which facilitates stable in situ retention. The strong interaction between docusate sodium and ropivacaine was verified using thermal and spectroscopic analyses, and the formation of micron-sized polymorphic vesicles was attributed to the mutual stabilizing interactions between ropivacaine-docusate sodium HIP, docusate sodium and lecithin. The HIP/LIPO delivery system could maintain drug release for more than 5 days in vitro and achieve high analgesic efficacy for more than 10 days in vivo, reducing the side effects associated with high drug doses. The stable HIP/LIPO delivery system is a promising strategy that offers a clinically beneficial alternative for postoperative pain management and other diseases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在下腹部手术后的第一天报告了中度至重度的疼痛。没有研究比较腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与后椎板阻滞(RLB)在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的术后疼痛缓解。
    在这个前景中,随机试验,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的42名男性患者的身体状况I和II,18-65岁,BMI<40kg/m2的患者在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术后接受TAP或RLB。进行了标准的全身麻醉技术。患者被随机分为两组:单次TAP阻滞(I组)(n=21)或RLB(II组)(n=21),双侧20ml0.375%罗哌卡因。术后,静脉给予扑热息痛1g作为抢救镇痛。术后24小时累积视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分被认为是主要结果。
    术后24小时休息时的累积VAS评分,表示为平均值±S.D(95%CI),TAP阻滞组为3.54±3.04(2.16~4.93),RLB组为6.09±4.83(3.89~8.29).TAP阻滞组P值为0.112,运动VAS值为7.95±3.41(6.39~9.50[2.5~15.0]),而RLB组的P值为0.110,运动时的VAS值为10.83±5.51(8.32-13.34)。
    在接受TAP阻滞或RLB的患者中,术后24h运动时的累积疼痛评分相似。然而,术后18小时和24小时接受TAP阻滞的患者在休息和运动时的VAS评分降低。
    UNASSIGNED: Moderate-to-severe intensity pain is reported on the first day following lower abdominal surgery. No study has compared transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with retrolaminar block (RLB) in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery for postoperative pain relief.
    UNASSIGNED: In this prospective, randomized trial, 42 male patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, aged 18-65 years, and having a BMI <40 kg/m2 received TAP or RLB following laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. A standard general anesthetic technique was performed. Patients were randomized into two groups: single-shot TAP block (group I) (n = 21) or the RLB (group II) (n = 21) with bilateral 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. Postoperatively, IV paracetamol 1 g was administered as rescue analgesia. Postoperative cumulative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score 24 hours after surgery was considered as the primary outcome.
    UNASSIGNED: Postoperative cumulative VAS score at rest at 24 h, represented as mean ± S.D (95% CI), in the TAP block group was 3.54 ± 3.04 (2.16-4.93) and in the RLB group was 6.09 ± 4.83 (3.89-8.29). P value was 0.112 and VAS on movement was 7.95 ± 3.41 (6.39-9.50 [2.5-15.0]) in TAP block group, whereas P value was 0.110 and VAS on movement was 10.83 ± 5.51 (8.32-13.34) in the RLB group.
    UNASSIGNED: Similar postoperative cumulative pain score on movement at 24 h was present in patients receiving TAP block or RLB. However, VAS score at rest and on movement was reduced in patients receiving TAP block at 18 and 24 h postoperatively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)用于胸外科手术以确保满意的术后镇痛,需要大剂量麻醉药,可能出现局部麻醉药全身毒性(LAST)的表现.目前,关于罗哌卡因在连续TPVB后的药代动力学的数据有限.这项前瞻性研究的目的是研究罗哌卡因动力学,在动脉和静脉池中,连续TPVB后,评估LAST的风险。
    全身麻醉诱导后立即,我们对18例接受开胸手术的成年患者在T5或T6或T7胸部水平进行了超声引导下的连续TPVB.通过胸椎旁导管单次推注25毫升0.5%罗哌卡因,然后在手术结束时开始以14ml/h的速度连续输注0.2%的罗哌卡因。使用经过验证的高效液相色谱法进行总罗哌卡因浓度的定量。针对动脉和静脉罗哌卡因数据分别开发了群体药代动力学模型。
    最好的模型是单室布置,并带有一个与胸椎旁间隙相对应的附加吸收室。性别对清除有重大影响,女性的消除能力低于男性。一些患者的罗哌卡因浓度高于毒性阈值,但没有显示出最后的证据。连续胸椎旁神经阻滞可提供足够的术后镇痛。
    临床使用上限的罗哌卡因剂量(800mg/d)没有造成LAST的表现,并提供了足够的术后疼痛控制。建立了药代动力学模型,并确定了性别的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Although thoracic paravertebral blockade (TPVB) is employed in thoracic surgery to ensure satisfactory postoperative analgesia, large doses of anesthetics are required and manifestations of local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) may appear. Currently, there are limited data on the pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine after continuous TPVB. The aim of this prospective study was to investigate ropivacaine kinetics, in the arterial and venous pools, after continuous TPVB and assess the risk of LAST.
    UNASSIGNED: Immediately after induction of general anesthesia, an ultrasound-guided continuous TPVB at T5 or T6 or T7 thoracic level was performed in 18 adult patients subjected to open thoracotomy. A 25-ml single bolus injection of ropivacaine 0.5% was administered through thoracic paravertebral catheter, followed by a 14 ml/h continuous infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% starting at the end of surgery. Quantification of total ropivacaine concentrations was performed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic models were developed separately for arterial and venous ropivacaine data.
    UNASSIGNED: The best model was one-compartment disposition with an additional pre-absorption compartment corresponding to thoracic paravertebral space. Gender had a significant effect on clearance, with females displaying lower elimination than males. Some patients had ropivacaine concentrations above the toxic threshold, but none displayed evidence of LAST. Continuous thoracic paravertebral nerve blocks provided adequate postoperative analgesia.
    UNASSIGNED: Ropivacaine doses at the upper end of clinical use (800 mg/d) did not inflict the manifestations of LAST and provided adequate postoperative pain control. Pharmacokinetic models were developed, and the effect of gender was identified.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是探讨多模式镇痛是否能减少肩关节镜手术患者术后阿片类药物的使用。
    方法:对2022年10月至2023年11月在我院接受肩峰下撞击综合征的患者进行回顾性分析。根据术后疼痛管理方法将患者分为观察组和对照组。对照组给予静脉自控电子镇痛(舒芬太尼注射液1μg/kg+布托啡诺注射液4mg+0.9%NaCl注射液100mL),观察组采用多模式镇痛(罗哌卡因肩峰下泵3mL/h,联合口服塞来昔布和对乙酰氨基酚)。术前和术后各个时间点记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,和阿片类药物的使用,住院时间,比较两组术后1周内镇痛相关并发症。36项简短形式健康调查(SF-36)得分和Constant-Murley得分(CMS),还在治疗后1天和1周进行评估。
    结果:本研究纳入了123例患者,观察组66例,对照组66例。在对照组中,有46名男性和20名女性,平均年龄55.47±11.42岁,观察组男性44例,女性22例,平均年龄56.13±12.19岁观察组在8h(T1)时一直报告疼痛强度明显低于对照组,24(T2),术后48h(T3)(p<0.05)。此外,观察组阿片类药物使用率和并发症发生率明显低于对照组(p<0.05)。观察组治疗1周后SF-36评分和CMS评分明显高于对照组(p<0.05)。
    结论:肩关节镜检查后,多模式镇痛有效减少阿片类药物的消耗,降低并发症发生率,并提供有效的短期疼痛缓解。这种方法对改善患者预后具有重要意义。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether multimodal analgesia can decrease postoperative opioid usage in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement syndrome who underwent acromioplasty at our institution between October 2022 and November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into an observation group and a control group based on postoperative pain management methods. The control group received intravenous self-controlled electronic analgesia (sufentanil injection 1 μg/kg + butorphanol injection 4 mg + 0.9% NaCl injection to 100 mL), while the observation group received multimodal analgesia (ropivacaine subacromial pump 3 mL/h, combined with oral celecoxib and acetaminophen). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were recorded preoperatively and at various postoperative time points, and opioid usage, length of hospital stay, and analgesia-related complications within 1 week postoperatively were compared between groups. The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores and the Constant-Murley score (CMS), were also assessed 1 day and 1 week after treatment.
    RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients were included in the study, 66 in the observation group and 66 in the control group. In the control group, there were 46 males and 20 females, with a mean age of 55.47 ± 11.42 years and in the observation group 44 males and 22 females, with a mean age of 56.13 ± 12.19 years The observation group consistently reported significantly lower pain intensity compared to the control group at 8 h (T1), 24 (T2), and 48 h (T3) after surgery (p < 0.05). Additionally, the observation group exhibited significantly lower opioid usage and complication rates compared to the control group (p < 0.05). SF-36 scores and CMS scores were significantly higher in the observation group 1 week after treatment compared to the control group (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Following shoulder arthroscopy, multimodal analgesia effectively reduces opioid consumption, lowers complication rates, and provides effective short-term pain relief. This approach carries significant implications for improving patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:据报道,3%氯普鲁卡因(CP)是分娩镇痛期间紧急剖宫产的孕妇常用的局部麻醉药。然而,0.75%罗哌卡因被认为是一种有前途和有效的替代品。因此,我们进行了一项随机对照试验,比较了0.75%罗哌卡因和3%氯普鲁卡因用于孕妇延长硬膜外麻醉的有效性和安全性.
    方法:我们进行了双盲,随机化,控制,单中心研究从2022年11月1日至2023年4月30日。我们选择了45名在分娩镇痛期间接受紧急剖宫产的孕妇,并随机分配他们以1:1的比例接受0.75%的罗哌卡因或3%的氯普鲁卡因。主要结果是在T4水平时丧失冷感的时间。
    结果:两组之间在达到冷感丧失的时间上存在显着差异(303,95CI255至402S与372,95CI297至630S,p=0.024)。Th4水平的运动阻滞程度无显著差异(p=0.185)。与氯普鲁卡因组相比,罗哌卡因组需要额外局部麻醉药的孕妇较少(4.5%VS。34.8%,p=0.011)。与氯普鲁卡因组相比,罗哌卡因组的术中VAS评分较低(p=0.023),患者满意度评分较高(p=0.040)。两组术中并发症发生率相似,无严重并发症发生。
    结论:我们的研究发现,0.75%罗哌卡因与术中疼痛治疗有关,在分娩镇痛期间接受紧急剖宫产的孕妇中,与3%氯普鲁卡因相比,患者满意度更高,起效时间缩短。因此,0.75%罗哌卡因可能是分娩镇痛期间紧急剖宫产孕妇的合适药物。
    背景:注册号:ChiCTR2200065201;http://www。chictr.org.cn,首席调查员:男人,注册日期:2022-10-31.
    BACKGROUND: 3% chloroprocaine (CP) has been reported as the common local anesthetic used in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. However, 0.75% ropivacaine is considered a promising and effective alternative. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of 0.75% ropivacaine with 3% chloroprocaine for extended epidural anesthesia in pregnant women.
    METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center study from November 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. We selected forty-five pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period and randomized them to receive either 0.75% ropivacaine or 3% chloroprocaine in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the time to loss of cold sensation at the T4 level.
    RESULTS: There was a significant difference between the two groups in the time to achieve loss of cold sensation (303, 95%CI 255 to 402 S vs. 372, 95%CI 297 to 630 S, p = 0.024). There was no significant difference the degree of motor block (p = 0.185) at the Th4 level. Fewer pregnant women required additional local anesthetics in the ropivacaine group compared to the chloroprocaine group (4.5% VS. 34.8%, p = 0.011). The ropivacaine group had lower intraoperative VAS scores (p = 0.023) and higher patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.040) than the chloroprocaine group. The incidence of intraoperative complications was similar between the two groups, and no serious complications were observed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that 0.75% ropivacaine was associated with less intraoperative pain treatment, higher patient satisfaction and reduced the onset time compared to 3% chloroprocaine in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period. Therefore, 0.75% ropivacaine may be a suitable drug in pregnant women undergoing urgent cesarean delivery during labor analgesia period.
    BACKGROUND: The registration number: ChiCTR2200065201; http://www.chictr.org.cn , Principal investigator: MEN, Date of registration: 31/10/2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经损伤是由于神经根接触而导致的经皮经椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术的严重并发症。罗哌卡因用于硬膜外麻醉的最大耐受浓度(MTC),定义为在保持神经根感觉的同时最小化疼痛的浓度。这个明显的优点允许患者在接触神经根时向外科医生提供反馈。
    我们使用偏硬币设计来确定MTC,这是通过10%有效浓度(EC10)估计的,ie,10%的患者在神经根中失去感觉的浓度。阳性反应的决定因素是与神经根接触时缺乏感觉反馈,与神经根接触时神经支配区域感觉发生的反馈被定义为负反应。主要结果是接触神经根的反应。次要结局是否定反应的类型和数量以及手术期间每位患者的疼痛评分。
    54名患者被纳入本研究。EC10为0.434%(95%CI:0.410%,0.440%)使用等渗回归,与0.431%(95%CI:0.399%,0.444%)使用probit回归。报告了三种类型的负面反应陈述,包括“触感”,神经根痛,和麻木。
    用于硬膜外麻醉的罗哌卡因的MTC为0.434%,以避免经皮经椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术中的神经损伤。
    UNASSIGNED: Nerve injury is a serious complication of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy due to nerve root contact. The maximum tolerable concentration (MTC) of ropivacaine concentration for epidural anaesthesia, is defined as the concentration that minimises pain while preserving the sensation of the nerve roots. This distinct advantage allows the patient to provide feedback to the surgeon when the nerve roots are contacted.
    UNASSIGNED: We used a biased-coin design to determine the MTC, which was estimated by the 10% effective concentration (EC10), ie, the concentration at which 10% of patients lost sensation in the nerve roots. The determinant for positive response was lack of sensory feedback upon contact with the nerve root, and the feedback from occurrence of sensations in the innervation area upon contact with the nerve root was defined as a negative response. Primary outcome was the response from contact nerve root. Secondary outcomes were the type and number of statements of negative response and each patient\'s pain score during surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-four patients were included in this study. The EC10 was 0.434% (95% CI: 0.410%, 0.440%) using isotonic regression in comparison with 0.431% (95% CI: 0.399%, 0.444%) using probit regression. Three type statements of negative response were reported including \"tactile sensation\", radiculalgia, and numbness.
    UNASSIGNED: The MTC of ropivacaine used for epidural anaesthesia was 0.434% to avoid nerve injury in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是比较4%阿替卡因的麻醉效果,0.5%布比卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因(1:200,000肾上腺素)在手术切除下颌第三磨牙时。
    该研究包括75名患者,随机分为3组,每组25名患者。研究变量是:麻醉作用的开始,手术时间和麻醉和术后镇痛。使用视觉模拟量表来评估不同时间间隔的疼痛。统计分析显示,在使用的麻醉溶液的体积方面,组间差异无统计学意义。麻醉质量,手术难度和手术持续时间。
    阿替卡因(1.14min)的平均起效时间明显短于(P<0.001)罗哌卡因(2.18min)和布比卡因(2.33min)。然而,与阿替卡因(232.8min和191.4min)相比,布比卡因(483.6min和464min)和罗哌卡因(426.6min和459min)的麻醉和镇痛持续时间明显(P<0.001)更长,分别。此外,三组术后6小时疼痛评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。
    罗哌卡因和布比卡因可安全用于预期手术持续时间较长的患者。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine, 0.5% bupivacaine and 0.5% ropivacaine (with 1:200,000 adrenaline) during surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 75 patients randomly divided into three equal groups of 25 patients each. The study variables were: onset of anesthetic action, duration of surgery and anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. A visual analog scale was used to assess pain at different time intervals. Statistical analysis revealed insignificant difference among groups in terms of volume of anesthetic solution used, quality of anesthesia, surgical difficulty and duration of surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean onset time was significantly (P < 0.001) shorter for articaine (1.14 min) than ropivacaine (2.18 min) and bupivacaine (2.33 min). However, the duration of anesthesia as well as analgesia was significantly (P < 0.001) longer for bupivacaine (483.6 min and 464 min) and ropivacaine (426.6 min and 459 min) as compared to articaine (232.8 min and 191.4 min), respectively. Also, on comparing three groups pain scores at 6th postoperative hour were significant (P < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Ropivacaine and bupivacaine can be safely used in patients where longer duration of surgery is anticipated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号