ropivacaine

罗哌卡因
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景罗哌卡因是一种广泛使用的局部麻醉药物,与血浆蛋白高度结合,游离血浆比例约为5%。因此,游离药物浓度的监测与进行药代动力学研究和了解药物药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)关系最为相关.方法描述了一种使用反相LC和具有多反应监测(MRM)的电喷雾电离质谱(LC-MS/MS)的高灵敏度液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法,用于定量人血浆中的游离和总罗哌卡因。罗哌卡因d7用作内标(IS)。结果该方法在0.5-3000ng/mL范围内得到验证,与五个级别的质量控制样品,并根据欧洲药品管理局和食品和药物管理局的指导方针。该方法性能优异,精密度在6.2%-14.7%范围内,准确率在93.6%和113.7%之间,IS归一化矩阵因子的变异系数(CV)低于15%。通过分析接受膝关节置换术并接受局部罗哌卡因浸润的患者的样品,证明了该方法对临床样品中游离和总罗哌卡因定量的适用性。结论开发并验证了一种定量人血浆中游离和总罗哌卡因的方法,该方法适用于临床样品的分析。
    Background Ropivacaine is a widely used local anaesthetic drug, highly bound to plasma proteins with a free plasma fraction of about 5%. Therefore, the monitoring of free drug concentration is most relevant to perform pharmacokinetic studies and to understand the drug pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship. Methods A high-sensitivity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method using reverse-phase LC and electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) is described for the quantitation of both free and total ropivacaine in human plasma. Ropivacaine-d7 was used as an internal standard (IS). Results The method was validated in the range 0.5-3000 ng/mL, with five levels of QC samples and according to the European Medicine Agency and Food and Drug Administration guidelines. The performance of the method was excellent with a precision in the range 6.2%-14.7%, an accuracy between 93.6% and 113.7% and a coefficient of variation (CV) of the IS-normalised matrix factor below 15%. This suitability of the method for the quantification of free and total ropivacaine in clinical samples was demonstrated with the analysis of samples from patients undergoing knee arthroplasty and receiving a local ropivacaine infiltration. Conclusions A method was developed and validated for the quantification of free and total ropivacaine in human plasma and was shown suitable for the analysis of clinical samples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    在35例患者中进行了计算机断层扫描,以测量腰丛分支与后上棘投影和脊柱的深度和关系。此外,我们前瞻性研究了80例计划行全髋关节置换术的患者,这些患者在术后接受了连续腰大区阻滞(CPCB).手术后使用改良的Winnie标志和神经刺激进行CPCB。插入5至8cm的导管。在注射10mL造影剂后获得射线照片。注射初始负荷剂量(0.4mL/kg)的0.2%罗哌卡因,随后连续输注0.2%罗哌卡因48h。测量腰丛的深度以及腰丛与L4横突之间的距离。在休息和动员期间获得1、12、24和48h时疼痛的视觉模拟量表值。还记录了抢救镇痛的量。在1和24小时注意到腰骶丛主要分支的感觉阻滞,与该技术相关的不良事件也是如此。腰丛深度的男女之间存在显着差异(中位数值,男女85比70毫米,分别)。体重指数与皮肤腰丛距离呈正相关。相比之下,L4横突与腰丛之间的距离没有差异。74%的患者的导管尖端位于腰大肌内,22%的患者位于腰大肌和腰方肌之间。在三个病人中,导管位置不正确.在1小时,股骨感觉阻滞,闭塞器,股外侧皮神经成功,分别,95%,90%,85%的患者。在24小时,这些比率是88%,88%,83%,分别。在48小时的研究期间,疼痛的视觉模拟评分中值在休息时约为10mm,在物理治疗期间约为18~25mm.5例患者在1h时接受5mg吗啡。在推注后注意到5例单侧硬膜外麻醉。我们得出的结论是,使用0.2%罗哌卡因的CPCB可以在髋关节置换术后获得最佳镇痛效果,副作用少,故障率小。在腰丛分支刺激和导管插入之前,麻醉医师应注意L4横突位置和腰丛深度。
    结论:腰丛深度与患者的体重指数相关,男女之间存在差异,但腰丛-横突距离并非如此。考虑到新的地标,连续腰大肌隔室阻滞可促进髋关节置换术后的最佳镇痛,副作用少。
    A computed tomographic scan was obtained in 35 patients to measure the depth and the relationship of the branches of the lumbar plexus to the posterior superior iliac spine projection and the vertebral column. In addition, we prospectively studied 80 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty who received a continuous psoas compartment block (CPCB) in the postoperative period. CPCB was performed after surgical procedures by using modified Winnie\'s landmarks and nerve stimulation. From 5 to 8 cm of catheter was inserted. Radiographs were obtained after injection of 10 mL of contrast medium. An initial loading dose (0.4 mL/kg) of 0.2% ropivacaine was injected, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine for 48 h. The depth of the lumbar plexus and the distance between the lumbar plexus and the L4 transverse process were measured. Visual analog scale values of pain at 1, 12, 24, and 48 h were obtained at rest and during mobilization. Amounts of rescue analgesia were also recorded. Sensory blockade of the principal branches of the lumbosacral plexus was noted at 1 and 24 h, as were adverse events related to the technique. There was a significant difference between men and women in depth of the lumbar plexus (median values, 85 vs 70 mm for men and women, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the body mass index and skin-lumbar plexus distances. In contrast, there was no difference regarding the distance between the transverse process of L4 and the lumbar plexus. The catheter tip lay within the psoas major muscle in 74% of the patients and between the psoas and quadratus lumborum muscles in 22%. In three patients, the catheter was improperly positioned. At 1 h, sensory blockade of the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves was successful in, respectively, 95%, 90%, and 85% of patients. At 24 h, these rates were 88%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. During the 48-h study period, median visual analog scale values of pain were approximately 10 mm at rest and from 18 to 25 mm during physiotherapy. Five patients received 5 mg of morphine at 1 h. Five cases of unilateral epidural anesthesia were noted after the bolus injection. We conclude that CPCB with 0.2% ropivacaine allows optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects and a small failure rate. Before lumbar plexus branch stimulation and catheter insertion, anesthesiologists should be aware of the L4 transverse process location and lumbar plexus depth.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar plexus depth is correlated with the patient\'s body mass index and differs between men and women, but this is not true of the lumbar plexus-transverse process distance. Considering new landmarks, a continuous psoas compartment block promotes optimal analgesia after hip arthroplasty, with few side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号