BACKGROUND: Ongoing lower extremity long-bone nonunion is a devastating condition and associated with substantial patient morbidity. There is limited evidence regarding physical and mental function after surgical management of lower extremity nonunions. The purpose of this study was to assess general physical and mental health and lower extremity specific physical function of patients that underwent surgery for a lower extremity long-bone nonunion.
METHODS: One-hundred and twenty-four adult patients who underwent successful surgical management for a lower extremity long-bone nonunion between June 2002 and December 2021 were evaluated at an average follow-up of 8.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 4 - 12). General physical and mental health was assessed with the Short-Form 12 (SF-12) physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries, and lower extremity specific physical function with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify variables that were independently associated with outcomes.
RESULTS: The median LEFS was 50 (IQR: 37 - 63) and the median SF-12 PCS was 43 (IQR: 33 - 52), which are both lower than normative population scores (LEFS: 77 and PCS: 51, p < 0.0001). The median SF-12 MCS was 50, which was comparable to the normative population score of 51 (p < 0.0001). The number of previous surgeries before the index nonunion treatment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.041) and the number of revision surgeries after the index nonunion treatment (p = 0.022 and p = 0.041) were associated with lower LEFS and SF-12 PCS scores.
CONCLUSIONS: At an average of 8.6 years after lower extremity nonunion surgery that led to bone healing, patients continue to report lower general and lower extremity specific physical functioning compared to the normative population. The number of surgical attempts to obtain definitive healing was associated with compromised physical function scores. Mental health scores may return close to normative population scores. These results can be used to inform patients and guide treatment strategies and healthcare policies.

OBJECTIVE: To identify anatomical factors affecting the outcome of dcryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
METHODS: The study included the results of dacryocystography in 73 patients after DCR: 37 cases of failed DCR and 36 cases of successful DCR. Biometric characteristics of the formed ostium were evaluated: the horizontal size of the bony \"window\" and the soft tissue part of the ostium, the vertical size of the bony \"window\" and soft tissue ostium, the height of the fragment of the remaining bone above and below the line of the common canaliculus, and the height of the \"pocket\" formed below the lower edge of the ostium. Statistical analysis was performed using parametric and non-parametric statistical methods. Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Intergroup differences were identified in the values of the maximum horizontal size of the bony \"window\" (p = 0.015), the maximum horizontal size of the soft tissue \"window\" (p < 0.001), the maximum vertical size of the soft tissue \"window\" (p < 0.001), and the height of the fragment of the remaining bone below the level of the common canaliculus to the edge of the formed ostium (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: The stage of forming the bony \"window\" influences the success of DCR. Not only the position of the \"window\" is important, but also the geometric properties of the formed ostium.

OBJECTIVE: Dual mobility (DM) implants have received increasing interest in revision surgery due to their increased stability. The aim of this systematic review was to compare outcomes of DM versus conventional fixed bearing (FB) implants in revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (r-THA).
METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed using the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases between January 2000 and 2023. Outcome measures included re-revision due to dislocation, re-revision for other causes, all-cause re-revision, total complication rate, and functional outcome measures. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) assessment tool was used to evaluate methodological quality and the risk of bias. A pooled meta-analysis was conducted, with an assessment of heterogeneity using the Chi-square and Higgins I2 tests. A further sub-group analysis was performed between DM implants and larger femoral head (> 36 mm) FB implants.
RESULTS: A total of 13 studies met the final inclusion criteria, with an overall number of 5,004 r-THA hips included (2,108 DM and 2,896 FB). The DM implants had significantly lower odds of re-revision due to dislocation (OR [odds ratio] 0.38, P < 0.001), aseptic loosening (OR 0.54, P = 0.004), and all-cause re-revision (OR 0.55, P < 0.001) compared to FB implants. No significant difference was seen in the odds of re-revision due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (OR 0.99, P = 0.94) or periprosthetic fracture (OR 0.59, P = 0.13) between the two groups. The total number of complications showed an odds benefit in favor of DM implants (OR 0.43, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in the odds of re-revision due to dislocation (OR 0.69, P = 0.11) between DM and larger femoral head FB implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Based upon current literature, it appears DM implants are an effective modality for reducing dislocation following r-THA with lower complication rates compared to FB implants. However, further prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with longer term follow up are required.

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of primary hip arthroplasty has led to a parallel rise in revision cases. Femoral revision often entails compromised bone integrity, requiring consideration of various solutions for optimal reconstructive options. Despite technological advancements, there is limited evidence on the clinical outcomes of the latest modular revision stems. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survival rates of next generation uncemented modular revision stem in patients undergoing hip revision surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective single-center study assessed the survival and failure causes of a specific uncemented modular stem in 48 patients undergoing hip revision surgery between 2012 and 2022. Data included preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes measured through clinical and radiographic assessments. Forty-eight patients (25 males, 23 females; mean age 72 years) were included, with a mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 5. Preoperative diagnoses varied, with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) being the most common (45.8%), followed by periprosthetic fractures (27.1%). Partial revisions occurred in 60.4%, total revisions in 39.6%. According to Paprosky classification of femoral bone loss, type II and III were the most represented, respectively 35.4% and 50%.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 4.6 years, stem survival was 92.5%. Complications (20%) included dislocation, PJI, fracture, and loosening; the overall reoperation rate was 12.5%. The SF-12 physical score was 43.6, while the mental score was 51.1. The HOOS score was 71.8, and the HHS score was 71.4. Radiographic analysis identified nonprogressive osteolysis in 15.1% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: This study on this uncemented modular revision stem demonstrated favorable outcomes in an elder fragile population with moderate to severe femoral bone loss. The implant\'s modularity provides versatility in addressing various defects, without any implant breakage observed during the study period. Literature comparison highlighted similar outcomes despite sample size differences. The promising results warrant continued investigation into the long-term survivorship of this modular stem system.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Perioperative practices have been introduced over the last decade to decrease the risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to determine whether rates of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for PJI decreased during the period 2006-2016.
UNASSIGNED: This observational cohort study used data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System to identify patients undergoing TKA in 2006-2016. Data through 2017 were used to determine if patients underwent revision TKA for PJI (including debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) within 1 year of the primary surgery. A generalized estimating equation model, clustered by hospital, was used to examine the impact of time on likelihood of revision TKA for PJI.
UNASSIGNED: In 2006-2016, 233,165 primary TKAs performed were included. Mean age was 66.1 (standard deviation 10.3) years, and 65% were women. Overall, 0.5% of the patients underwent revision TKA for PJI within 1 year of surgery. The generalized estimating equation model showed that for primary TKA performed in 2006-2013, year of surgery did not impact the likelihood of revision TKA for PJI (odds ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.97-1.03, P = .9221), but that for primary TKA performed in 2014-2016, the likelihood decreased by year (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.66-0.88, P = .0002).
UNASSIGNED: The likelihood of revision TKA for PJI was stable from 2006 to 2013 but declined during the period 2014-2016 across patient and hospital categories. This decline could be due to infection mitigation strategies or other unmeasured factors.

Implant-related infections (IRIs) represent a significant challenge to modern surgery. The occurrence of these infections is due to the ability of pathogens to aggregate and form biofilms, which presents a challenge to both the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of the infection. Biofilms provide pathogens with protection from the host immune response and antibiotics, making detection difficult and complicating both single-stage and two-stage revision procedures. This narrative review examines advanced chemical antibiofilm techniques with the aim of improving the detection and identification of pathogens in IRIs. The articles included in this review were selected from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, MDPI and SpringerLink, which focus on recent studies evaluating the efficacy and enhanced accuracy of microbiological sampling and culture following the use of chemical antibiofilm. Although promising results have been achieved with the successful application of some antibiofilm chemical pre-treatment methods, mainly in orthopedics and in cardiovascular surgery, further research is required to optimize and expand their routine use in the clinical setting. This is necessary to ensure their safety, efficacy and integration into diagnostic protocols. Future studies should focus on standardizing these techniques and evaluating their effectiveness in large-scale clinical trials. This review emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in developing reliable diagnostic tools and highlights the need for innovative approaches to improve outcomes for patients undergoing both single-stage and two-stage revision surgery for implant-related infections.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of primary total knee arthroplasty patients require revision within 10 years, often due to distal component loosening. Application of a thin layer of PMMA cement as precoating on the tibial component aims to prevent aseptic loosening. This study investigates the impact of precoating and fat contamination on tibial baseplate stability.
METHODS: Two groups of NexGen® stemmed tibial implants (size 4) were studied: Option implants (N = 12) and PMMA Precoat implants (N = 12). Each implant design was divided into two subgroups, (N = 6), with one subgroup featuring bone marrow fat at the implant-cement interface and the other without contamination. In a mechanical testing machine, the implants underwent uniaxial loading for 20,000 cycles, while recording vertical micromotion and migration of the tibial baseplates. Subsequently, a push-out test assessed fixation strength at the cement interfaces. Results were compared using non-parametric statistics and presented as median and min-to-max ranges.
RESULTS: Option implants exhibited higher micromotion in dry conditions compared to precoated implants (p = 0.03). Under contamination, both designs demonstrated similar micromotion values. Fixation strength did not significantly differ between designs under dry, uncontaminated conditions (p > 0.99). However, under contaminated conditions, the failure load for the non-coated Option implant was nearly half that of the uncontaminated counterparts (3517 N, 2603-4367 N vs 7531 N, 5163-9000 N; p = 0.002). Precoat implants displayed less susceptibility to fat contamination (p = 0.30).
CONCLUSIONS: NexGen® implant PMMA precoating might reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and revision surgery in case of eventual bone-marrow fat contamination.

UNASSIGNED: Given the complexity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and increasing prevalence, there is a need for comprehensive, large-scale studies that investigate potential correlations between surgeon-specific factors and postoperative outcomes after ARCR. This study examines how surgeon-specific factors including case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice impact two-year reoperation rates, conversion to total shoulder arthroplasty (anatomic or reverse), and 90-day post-ARCR hospitalization.
UNASSIGNED: The PearlDiver Mariner database was used to collect surgeon-specific variables and query patients who underwent ARCR from 2015 to 2018. Patient outcomes were tracked for two years, including reoperations, hospitalizations, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for revision rotator cuff repair (RCR) laterality. Hospitalizations were defined as any emergency department (ED) visit or hospital readmission within 90 days after primary ARCR. Surgeon-specific factors including surgeon case volume, career length, fellowship training, practice setting, and regional practice were analyzed in relation to postoperative outcomes using both univariate and multivariate logistic regression.
UNASSIGNED: 94,150 patients underwent ARCR by 1489 surgeons. On multivariate analysis, high-volume surgeons demonstrated a higher risk for two-year total reoperation (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.12, P = .03) and revision RCR (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, P = .02) compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons showed higher rates of 90-day ED visits (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.68-0.78, P < .001) and hospital readmission (mid-career surgeons: OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63-0.87, P < .001; late-career surgeons: OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, P = .006) compared to mid- and late-career surgeons. Sports medicine and/or shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated lower two-year reoperation risk (OR = 0.95, CI: 0.91-0.99, P = .04) and fewer 90-day ED visits (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.88-0.98, P = .002). Academic surgeons experienced higher readmission rates compared to community surgeons (OR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.01-1.34, P = .03). Surgeons practicing in the Northeast demonstrated lower two-year reoperation (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.93, P < .001) and revision (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.83-0.94, P < .001) RCR risk compared to surgeons in the Southern United States.
UNASSIGNED: High-volume surgeons exhibit higher two-year reoperation rates after ARCR compared to low-volume surgeons. Early-career surgeons demonstrate increased hospitalizations. Sports medicine or shoulder and elbow surgery fellowships correlate with reduced two-year reoperation rates and 90-day ED visits.

OBJECTIVE: To describe modes of failure of cervical TDR, their related treatment strategies, and to describe a management strategy for the treatment of failed cervical TDR.
METHODS: This retrospective study was based on a consecutive series of 53 cervical TDR patients who underwent removal or revision surgery. Chart review was conducted to collect general descriptive data, reasons for TDR removal/revision, duration from index implantation to re-operation, and the subsequent procedure performed.
RESULTS: Among 53 patients, 36 underwent TDR removal and fusion, 16 underwent TDR removal and replacement with another TDR, and one patient\'s TDR was revised by repositioning. The mean duration from index surgery to removal/revision was 40.1 months (range: 3 days-222 months). In all cases, removal/revision surgery was completed without complication. The most common reason for removal was severe osteolysis, often involving C. acnes infection, and was primarily associated with one implant type. TDR removal and fusion were performed for subsidence, device migration, treatment of symptoms arising from posterior anatomy (facet joints, etc.), approach-related complications and pain. TDR replacement was feasible for hypermobility, metal allergy, implant locked in kyphosis, and oversized implant use. In one case of TDR malpositioning, the device was successfully revised into appropriate position.
CONCLUSIONS: After cervical TDR failure, replacing a TDR with another implant can be feasible. Reasons for revision or removal after cervical TDR surgery include biomechanical failure, implant migration, surgeon or technical error, or biological reasons. The type of failure can help the surgeon create a strategy to address these complications.