respiratory therapy

呼吸治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管压力支持通气是重症监护病房中最常用的辅助通气模式之一,仍然缺乏设定压力支持的精确策略。通过执行吸气末气道阻塞,峰值和高原气道压力之间的差异,定义为压力肌指数(PMI),可以在呼吸机屏幕上轻松测量。先前的研究表明,PMI在检测高吸气量和低吸气量方面是准确的。尚未进行研究以调查使用PMI作为设定吸气压力支持的指标。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的研究方案,单中心,随机对照,试点试验。60名接受压力支持通气的参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配到对照组或干预组。根据标准护理调整压力支持或由PMI策略指导48小时,分别。将评估PMI指导战略的可行性。主要终点是公认的正常范围内的吸气努力测量值的比例,预定义为每分钟50至200cmH2O·s/min之间的食管压力-时间乘积,在48小时的压力支持调整期间,每位患者。
    背景:研究方案已获得北京天坛医院批准(KY2023-005-02)。本研究中产生的数据将根据合理要求从相应的作者处获得。试验结果将提交给国际同行评审期刊。
    背景:NCT05963737;ClinicalTrials.org。
    BACKGROUND: Although pressure support ventilation is one of the most commonly used assisted ventilation modes in intensive care units, there is still a lack of precise strategies for setting pressure support. By performing an end-inspiratory airway occlusion, the difference between the peak and plateau airway pressure, which is defined as pressure muscle index (PMI), can be easily measured on the ventilator screen. Previous studies have shown that PMI is accurate in detecting high and low inspiratory effort. No study has been conducted to investigate the use of PMI as an indicator for setting inspiratory pressure support.
    METHODS: This is a study protocol for a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled, pilot trial. Sixty participants undergoing pressure support ventilation will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the control group or intervention group, with pressure support adjusted according to standard care or guided by the PMI strategy for 48 hours, respectively. The feasibility of the PMI-guided strategy will be evaluated. The primary endpoint is the proportion of inspiratory effort measurements within a well-accepted \'normal\' range, which is predefined as oesophageal pressure-time product per minute between 50 and 200 cmH2O⋅s/min, for each patient during 48 hours of pressure support adjustment.
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol has been approved by Beijing Tiantan Hospital (KY2023-005-02). The data generated in the present study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The results of the trial will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05963737; ClinicalTrials.org.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高质量的呼吸道护理和气道清除对于神经肌肉疾病(pwNMD)患者至关重要,因为呼吸道感染是发病和死亡的主要原因。本综述通过强调咳嗽峰值流量的作用以及其他咳嗽评估选项来扩展已发布的指南。并讨论了影响pwNMD呼吸治疗实践的最新关键研究成果。
    High-quality respiratory care and airway clearance is essential for people with neuromuscular disease (pwNMD) as respiratory tract infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This review expands on published guidelines by highlighting the role of cough peak flow along with other options for cough evaluation, and discusses recent key research findings which have influenced the practice of respiratory therapy for pwNMD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:机械通气是一种常见的挽救生命的程序,但可能导致严重的并发症,包括ARDS和氧毒性。不遵守肺保护性通气指南是常见的。我们假设呼吸治疗师驱动的机械通气束可以提高ICU对肺保护性通气的依从性并降低肺部并发症的发生率。
    方法:2018年8月1日,在中西部学术三级中心的所有成人ICU中实施了呼吸治疗师驱动的方案。协议针对低潮气量,足够的PEEP,限制氧气,充足的呼吸频率,和床头标高。回顾性观察了2011年1月至2019年12月期间入住ICU和通气≥24小时的成年受试者对肺保护指南的依从性和临床结果。
    结果:我们纳入了666名受试者;干预前68.5%,干预后31.5%。调整体重指数和插管指征后,在干预后观察到肺保护性通气指南的总体依从性显著提高(校正比值比2.48,95%CI1.73~3.56).与干预前相比,干预后诊断为ARDS的受试者较少(调整后比值比0.22,95%CI0.08-0.65)。呼吸机相关性肺炎的发生率无差异,无呼吸机日,ICU死亡率,或在ICU出院后1个月内死亡。
    结论:呼吸治疗师驱动的方案提高了ICU对肺保护性机械通气指南的依从性,并与ARDS发病率降低相关。
    BACKGROUND: Mechanical ventilation is a common life-saving procedure but can lead to serious complications, including ARDS and oxygen toxicity. Nonadherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines is common. We hypothesized that a respiratory therapist-driven mechanical ventilation bundle could increase adherence to lung-protective ventilation and decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications in the ICU.
    METHODS: A respiratory therapist-driven protocol was implemented on August 1, 2018, in all adult ICUs of a Midwestern academic tertiary center. The protocol targeted low tidal volume, adequate PEEP, limiting oxygen, adequate breathing frequency, and head of the bed elevation. Adherence to lung-protective guidelines and clinical outcomes were retrospectively observed in adult subjects admitted to the ICU and on ventilation for ≥ 24 h between January 2011 and December 2019.
    RESULTS: We included 666 subjects; 68.5% were in the pre-intervention group and 31.5% were in the post-intervention group. After adjusting for body mass index and intubation indication, a significant increase in overall adherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines was observed in the post-intervention period (adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.73-3.56). Fewer subjects were diagnosed with ARDS in the post-intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.65) than in the pre-intervention group. There was no difference in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-free days, ICU mortality, or death within 1 month of ICU discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: A respiratory therapist-driven protocol increased adherence to lung-protective mechanical ventilation guidelines in the ICU and was associated with decreased ARDS incidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:气道清除(ACT)和肺容量募集(LVR)技术用于管理支气管分泌物,增加咳嗽效率和肺/胸壁募集,预防和治疗呼吸道感染。该研究的目的是回顾法国儿童家庭使用的ACT/LVR技术的处方。
    方法:邀请国家儿科无创通气(NIV)网络的所有中心为每个年龄≤20岁的儿童填写匿名问卷,这些儿童在2022年至2023年之间开始使用ACT/LVR设备进行治疗。这些装置包括机械排气(MI-E),间歇性正压呼吸(IPPB),肺内冲击通气(IPV),和/或用于ACT/LVR的有创机械通气(IMV)/NIV。
    结果:13个中心纳入了139名患者。83例(60%)患者开始IPPB,MI-E为43(31%),IPV为30(22%)。没有患者使用IMV/NIV进行ACT/LVR。这些设备主要由儿科肺科医师(103,74%)处方。开始时的平均年龄为8.9±5.6(0.4-18.5)岁。ACT/LVR设备主要用于神经肌肉疾病(n=66,47%)和神经残疾(n=37,27%)的患者。MI-E的主要起始标准是咳嗽辅助(81%)和气道清除(60%),IPPB的胸腔动员(63%)和肺活量(47%),和气道清除率(73%)和反复呼吸加重(57%)的IPV。父母是在家进行治疗的主要照顾者。
    结论:IPPB是最常用的技术。疾病和启动标准是不同的,强调需要研究验证这些技术的适应症和设置。
    BACKGROUND: Airway clearance (ACT) and lung volume recruitment (LVR) techniques are used to manage bronchial secretions, increase cough efficiency and lung/chest wall recruitment, to prevent and treat respiratory tract infections. The aim of the study was to review the prescription of ACT/LVR techniques for home use in children in France.
    METHODS: All the centers of the national pediatric noninvasive ventilation (NIV) network were invited to fill in an anonymous questionnaire for every child aged ≤20 years who started a treatment with an ACT/LVR device between 2022 and 2023. The devices comprised mechanical in-exsufflation (MI-E), intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/NIV for ACT/LVR.
    RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included by 13 centers. IPPB was started in 83 (60 %) patients, MI-E in 43 (31 %) and IPV in 30 (22 %). No patient used IMV/NIV for ACT/LVR. The devices were prescribed mainly by pediatric pulmonologists (103, 74 %). Mean age at initiation was 8.9 ± 5.6 (0.4-18.5) years old. The ACT/LVR devices were prescribed mainly in patients with neuromuscular disorders (n = 66, 47 %) and neurodisability (n = 37, 27 %). The main initiation criteria were cough assistance (81 %) and airway clearance (60 %) for MI-E, thoracic mobilization (63 %) and vital capacity (47 %) for IPPB, and airway clearance (73 %) and repeated respiratory exacerbations (57 %) for IPV. The parents were the main carers performing the treatment at home.
    CONCLUSIONS: IPPB was the most prescribed technique. Diseases and initiation criteria are heterogeneous, underlining the need for studies validating the indications and settings of these techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,呼吸支持设备明显供不应求,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。因此,许多医院转向替代呼吸疗法,包括使用气体操作的呼吸机(GOV)。这项研究的目的是描述GOV作为危重病COVID-19患者的无创桥接呼吸治疗的用途,并将使用该设备与常规呼吸治疗获得的临床结果进行比较。第一波局部大流行期间重症COVID-19患者的回顾性队列分析。最终分析包括204例患者,根据最初24小时接受的呼吸治疗类型进行分组。如下:常规氧疗(COT),n=28(14%);政府,n=72(35%);无创通气(NIV),n=49(24%);有创机械通气(IMV),n=55(27%)。在72例中,GOV在这些患者中的42例(58%)中用作无创桥接呼吸治疗。在其他30名患者(42%)中,20人(28%)出现临床改善并出院;10人(14%)死亡。在COT和GOV组中,68%和39%,分别,进展为插管(P≤0.001)。GOV和NIV组的临床结果相似(无统计学差异)。在超过一半的患者中,GOV已成功用作无创桥接呼吸疗法。GOV组的临床结果与NIV组相当。这些发现支持将GOV用作紧急情况,非侵入性桥接呼吸治疗在医疗危机时,替代治疗标准可能是合理的。
    During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a notable undersupply of respiratory support devices, especially in low- and middle-income countries. As a result, many hospitals turned to alternative respiratory therapies, including the use of gas-operated ventilators (GOV). The aim of this study was to describe the use of GOV as a noninvasive bridging respiratory therapy in critically ill COVID-19 patients and to compare clinical outcomes achieved with this device to conventional respiratory therapies. Retrospective cohort analysis of critically ill COVID-19 patients during the first local wave of the pandemic. The final analysis included 204 patients grouped according to the type of respiratory therapy received in the first 24 h, as follows: conventional oxygen therapy (COT), n = 28 (14%); GOV, n = 72 (35%); noninvasive ventilation (NIV), n = 49 (24%); invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), n = 55 (27%). In 72, GOV served as noninvasive bridging respiratory therapy in 42 (58%) of these patients. In the other 30 patients (42%), 20 (28%) presented clinical improvement and were discharged; 10 (14%) died. In the COT and GOV groups, 68% and 39%, respectively, progressed to intubation (P ≤ 0.001). Clinical outcomes in the GOV and NIV groups were similar (no statistically significant differences). GOV was successfully used as a noninvasive bridging respiratory therapy in more than half of patients. Clinical outcomes in the GOV group were comparable to those of the NIV group. These findings support the use of GOV as an emergency, noninvasive bridging respiratory therapy in medical crises when alternative approaches to the standard of care may be justifiable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗不足可能会对其进展产生负面影响。吸入疗法是这些病症的药物疗法的基石。然而,低依从性等挑战,消极态度,关于吸入药物的误解仍然存在,阻碍有效的疾病管理。本研究旨在评估依从性,确定哮喘和COPD的疾病控制水平,探索伏伊伏丁那省阻塞性肺疾病患者和普通人群对吸入治疗的潜在误解,并评估研究中使用的新开发问卷的可靠性。材料和方法:这项横断面研究利用了一系列包含社会人口统计数据的问卷,哮喘控制测试(ACT),COPD评估测试(CAT),以及两份新颖的问卷-一份用于评估依从性,另一份用于分析对吸入治疗的态度。采用SPSS软件进行统计分析,版本25.0。结果:哮喘患者的ACT平均得分为17.31,而COPD患者的CAT问卷平均得分为19.09。新开发的依从性评估问卷的综合得分为2.27,显示出低于建议的可靠性系数(α=0.468)。样本亚组之间在对吸入治疗的态度和误解方面出现了显着的统计差异。该问卷的可靠性系数被认为是令人满意的(α=0.767)。结论:在研究人群的两个亚组中,依从率明显欠佳。哮喘患者的疾病控制水平较高,与COPD患者和健康人群相比,他们对吸入治疗的误解较少。
    Background and Objectives: Inadequate treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) might have a negative impact on their progression. Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for these conditions. However, challenges such as low adherence, negative attitudes, and misconceptions about inhaled medications still persist, impeding effective disease management. This study aimed to evaluate adherence, ascertain the level of disease control in asthma and COPD, explore potential misconceptions surrounding inhalation therapy among patients with obstructive lung diseases and the general population in Vojvodina, and evaluate the reliability of newly developed questionnaires employed in the study. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized a battery of questionnaires encompassing sociodemographic data, the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), along with two novel questionnaires-one for assessing adherence and another for analyzing attitudes toward inhalation therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software, version 25.0. Results: The average ACT score among patients with asthma was 17.31, while it was 19.09 for the CAT questionnaire among COPD patients. The composite score on the newly developed adherence assessment questionnaire was 2.27, exhibiting a reliability coefficient lower than recommended (α = 0.468). Significant statistical differences emerged among sample subgroups regarding attitudes and misconceptions toward inhalation therapy. The reliability coefficient for this questionnaire was deemed satisfactory (α = 0.767). Conclusions: Adherence rates were notably suboptimal in both subgroups of the studied population. The disease control levels were higher among asthma patients, while they exhibited less prevalent misconceptions regarding inhalation therapy compared to COPD patients and the healthy population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:增强肺功能可以显著改善脑瘫患儿的日常生活功能,导致临床实践中对呼吸理疗训练设备的兴趣增加。本研究旨在评估通过各种呼吸参数改善肺功能的设备(吸气肌肉训练和反馈设备)的功效。
    方法:在7个数据库中对随机临床试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,直至2023年5月。纳入的研究重点是使用特定设备(吸气肌肉训练和反馈设备)训练脑瘫儿童的吸气肌肉功能。主要结果为最大呼气压力和最大吸气压力。次要结果包括强制肺活量,一秒钟内用力呼气量,呼气流量峰值,和Tiffenau指数.通过估计效果大小及其95%置信区间来计算呼吸治疗的效果。使用CochraneCollaboration的偏倚风险评估工具(RoB2)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:九项研究被纳入系统评价和荟萃分析,共涉及321名年龄在6至18岁之间的儿童进行二次分析后.发现反馈装置在改善最大呼气压力方面更有效(效应大小-0.604;置信区间-1.368至0.161),呼气流量峰值,一秒钟内用力呼气量,和强制肺活量。吸气肌肉训练装置在改善最大吸气压力方面产生了更好的效果(效应大小-0.500;置信区间-1.259至0.259),Tiffeneau指数,和生活质量。
    结论:两种装置均显示出改善脑瘫患儿肺功能的潜力。需要进一步的高质量临床试验来确定每个肺功能参数的最佳剂量和最有益的设备类型。
    BACKGROUND: Enhancing lung function can significantly improve daily life functionality for children with cerebral palsy, leading to increased interest in respiratory physiotherapy training devices in clinical practice. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of devices (inspiratory muscle training and feedback devices) for improving pulmonary function through various respiratory parameters.
    METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials was conducted in seven databases up until May 2023. The included studies focused on training inspiratory muscle function using specific devices (inspiratory muscle training and feedback devices) in children with cerebral palsy. The main outcomes were maximum expiratory pressure and maximum inspiratory pressure. Secondary outcomes included forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, peak expiratory flow, and the Tiffenau index. The effects of respiratory treatment were calculated through the estimation of the effect size and its 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool for assessing the risk of bias (RoB2).
    RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the systematic review with meta-analysis, involving a total of 321 children aged between 6 and 18 years after secondary analyses were conducted. Feedback devices were found to be more effective in improving maximum expiratory pressure (effect size -0.604; confidence interval -1.368 to 0.161), peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and forced vital capacity. Inspiratory muscle training devices yielded better effectiveness in improving maximum inspiratory pressure (effect size -0.500; confidence interval -1.259 to 0.259), the Tiffeneau index, and quality of life.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both devices showed potential in improving pulmonary function in children with cerebral palsy. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal dosage and the most beneficial device type for each pulmonary function parameter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言有效的沟通在医疗保健中起着举足轻重的作用,显著影响患者体验和结果。虽然目前的许多文献都集中在医生和护士之间的沟通动态,在呼吸治疗等相关卫生专业中,在理解这些动态方面存在差距。这项研究探索了知识,态度,以及呼吸治疗学生和实习生之间的患者沟通意识。方法这项描述性横断面研究调查了这些知识,态度,以及吉达呼吸治疗学生和实习生对患者有效沟通方法的认识,沙特阿拉伯。使用经过验证的自我管理问卷,这项研究调查了来自三所大学和相关医院的350人。结果分析涉及350名参与者,女性占55.1%。研究发现,达成共识的最高水平(平均4.6±0.62)是与在沟通中向患者介绍呼吸治疗师有关的基本知识。女学生在结束患者访谈方面表现出显著的熟练程度(P=0.033),而男生擅长理解与无意识患者的沟通方法(P=0.010)。实习生表现出对患者沟通技巧的最全面理解,特别是在使用开放式问题(P=0.009)和允许患者有足够的时间表达他们的担忧(P=0.020)方面。性别和学业进展被确定为影响呼吸治疗学生和实习生患者沟通技巧的因素。结论本研究强调了呼吸治疗学生和实习生需要量身定制的沟通培训。它强调通过解决知识差距和确定需要改进的领域来提高这一重要领域的熟练程度的重要性。
    Introduction Effective communication in healthcare plays a pivotal role, significantly impacting patient experiences and outcomes. While much of the current literature focuses on communication dynamics among physicians and nurses, a gap exists in understanding these dynamics within allied health professions such as respiratory therapy. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and awareness of patient communication among respiratory therapy students and interns. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study investigated the knowledge, attitudes, and awareness of effective communication methods with patients among respiratory therapy students and interns in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Using a validated self-administered questionnaire, the study surveyed 350 individuals from three universities and associated hospitals. Results The analysis involved 350 participants, with females comprising 55.1%. The study found that the highest level of agreement (mean 4.6±0.62) was regarding essential knowledge related to introducing respiratory therapists to patients during communication. Female students demonstrated significant proficiency in concluding patient interviews (P=0.033), while male students excelled in comprehending communication methods with unconscious patients (P=0.010). Interns exhibited the most comprehensive understanding of patient communication skills, particularly in employing open-ended questions (P=0.009) and allowing adequate time for patients to express their concerns (P=0.020). Gender and academic progression were identified as factors influencing patient communication skills in respiratory therapy students and interns. Conclusion This study highlights the need for tailored communication training for respiratory therapy students and interns. It emphasizes the importance of enhancing proficiency in this vital field by addressing knowledge gaps and identifying areas for improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号