%0 Journal Article
%T Lung volume recruitment and airway clearance for children at home in France.
%A Khirani S
%A Griffon L
%A Thébault C
%A Aubertin G
%A Dupont P
%A Mbieleu B
%A Galodé F
%A Canavesio C
%A Fleurence E
%A Labouret G
%A Cros P
%A Barzic A
%A Lubrano Lavadera M
%A Giovannini-Chami L
%A Gilardoni JM
%A Gourdan P
%A Moreau J
%A Matecki S
%A Zitvogel F
%A Durand M
%A Perisson C
%A Le Clainche L
%A Taytard J
%A Fauroux B
%A
%J Respir Med
%V 231
%N 0
%D 2024 Sep 29
%M 38950683
%F 4.582
%R 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107726
%X BACKGROUND: Airway clearance (ACT) and lung volume recruitment (LVR) techniques are used to manage bronchial secretions, increase cough efficiency and lung/chest wall recruitment, to prevent and treat respiratory tract infections. The aim of the study was to review the prescription of ACT/LVR techniques for home use in children in France.
METHODS: All the centers of the national pediatric noninvasive ventilation (NIV) network were invited to fill in an anonymous questionnaire for every child aged ≤20 years who started a treatment with an ACT/LVR device between 2022 and 2023. The devices comprised mechanical in-exsufflation (MI-E), intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and/or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)/NIV for ACT/LVR.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-nine patients were included by 13 centers. IPPB was started in 83 (60 %) patients, MI-E in 43 (31 %) and IPV in 30 (22 %). No patient used IMV/NIV for ACT/LVR. The devices were prescribed mainly by pediatric pulmonologists (103, 74 %). Mean age at initiation was 8.9 ± 5.6 (0.4-18.5) years old. The ACT/LVR devices were prescribed mainly in patients with neuromuscular disorders (n = 66, 47 %) and neurodisability (n = 37, 27 %). The main initiation criteria were cough assistance (81 %) and airway clearance (60 %) for MI-E, thoracic mobilization (63 %) and vital capacity (47 %) for IPPB, and airway clearance (73 %) and repeated respiratory exacerbations (57 %) for IPV. The parents were the main carers performing the treatment at home.
CONCLUSIONS: IPPB was the most prescribed technique. Diseases and initiation criteria are heterogeneous, underlining the need for studies validating the indications and settings of these techniques.