recurrent infection

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对螺杆菌(H.)幽门螺杆菌。然而,有时细菌没有完全消除,或者是反复发作的.与大多数感染不同,消除幽门螺杆菌感染是非常困难的。异质抗性被定义为相同细菌菌落的亚群对特定抗生素表现出一定范围的敏感性的现象。因为异源耐药细胞,抗生素失效和慢性感染可能发生;因此,当前的研究旨在调查从Ilam的临床患者中收集的幽门螺杆菌中是否存在异源耐药细胞,伊朗。随后,感染异源耐药幽门螺杆菌的患者接受对异源耐药亚群有效的抗生素治疗.
    在这项横断面描述性研究中,在Ilam的私人诊所研究了100例有临床症状并怀疑感染幽门螺杆菌的患者,伊朗。从Ilam诊所获得了伴随患者的15株幽门螺杆菌的信息。我们培养了细菌,以鉴定这些患者的异源性耐药性并找到复发感染的原因。
    在总共50个样本中,3个对克拉霉素具有异源抗性(6%)。左氧氟沙星应用于异质耐药样品,并在对患者进行一个月的随访后确定有效性。
    异抗患者对左氧氟沙星敏感。经过一个月的随访,发现这种抗生素的效果很好。因此,这种抗生素作为一种更有效的药物被引入到幽门螺杆菌异源耐药患者中.
    幽门螺杆菌(H.)。ManchmalwerdennictalleBakterienabgetötetodersietretenwiederauf.安德斯·贝登·梅斯顿·费克伦·塞尔·施维里格,幽门螺杆菌感染。HeteroreistenzistdefiniertalsinPhänomen,BedemSubpopulationenderselbenSpecieseineunterschedlicheEmpfindlichkeitgegenübereinembestimintenAntibiotikumaufweisen.AufgrundderHeteroreistenzkanneszumVersagendesAntibiotikumsundzueinerchronischenInfektionkommen.DahersolltedasVorhandensein异性恋者ZellenvonPatientenausIlam,伊朗,vonH.pyloriuntersuchtwerden.死亡病人是沃科曼异性恋者幽门螺杆菌亚群,乌尔登。
    UNASSIGNED: Special antibiotics are prescribed against Helicobacter (H.) pylori. However, sometimes the bacteria are not completely eliminated, or they are recurrent. Unlike most infections, it is very difficult to eliminate a H. pylori infection. Heteroresistance is defined as the phenomenon in which subpopulations of the same colony of bacteria exhibit a range of susceptibilities to a particular antibiotic. Because of heteroresistant cells, antibiotic failure and chronic infection can occur; thus, the current research aimed to investigate presence of heteroresistant cells in H. pylori collected from patients reffering to clinic in Ilam, Iran. Subsequently, patients who were infected with heteroresistant H. p ylori were treated with antibiotics effective against heteroresistant subpopulations.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 100 patients with clinical symptoms and suspected of being infected with H. pylori were studied in private clinics in Ilam, Iran. Fiftyisolates of H. pylori accompanied by patients\' information were obtained from Ilam clinics. We cultured the bacteria to identify heteroresistance and to find the cause of recurrent infection in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of a total of 50 samples, 3 were heteroresistant to clarithromycin (6%). Levofloxacin was applied in cases of heteroresistant samples, and the effectiveness was determined after one month of follow-up of patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with heteroresistance showed sensitivity to levofloxacin. After one month of follow-up, it was found that the effectiveness of this antibiotic was good. Therefore, this antibiotic was introduced as a more effective drug in patients with heteroresistant H. pylori.
    Zur Eradikation von Helicobacter (H.) pylori werden spezielle Antibiotika verschrieben. Manchmal werden nicht alle Bakterien abgetötet oder sie treten wieder auf. Anders als bei den meisten Infektionen ist es sehr schwierig, eine H. pylori-Infektion zu beseitigen. Heteroresistenz ist definiert als ein Phänomen, bei dem Subpopulationen derselben Species eine unterschiedliche Empfindlichkeit gegenüber einem bestimmten Antibiotikum aufweisen. Aufgrund der Heteroresistenz kann es zum Versagen des Antibiotikums und zu einer chronischen Infektion kommen. Daher sollte das Vorhandensein heteroresistenter Zellen von Patienten aus Ilam, Iran, von H. pylori untersucht werden. Die Patienten mit Vorkommen heteroresistenter H. pylori Subpopulationen wurden mit gegen diese Erreger wirksamen Antibiotika behandelt.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    先前仅将半伯克霍尔德氏菌鉴定为洋葱伯克霍尔德氏菌复合体中的植物病原体。我们在中国介绍了一例归因于半夏双歧杆菌感染的复发性肺炎。值得注意的是,在无相关原发疾病的免疫活性患者中表现出的感染,并持续>3年。
    Burkholderia semiarida was previously identified solely as a plant pathogen within the Burkholderia cepacia complex. We present a case in China involving recurrent pneumonia attributed to B. semiarida infection. Of note, the infection manifested in an immunocompetent patient with no associated primary diseases and endured for >3 years.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估不同COVID-19患者的干眼病(DED)症状和心理健康状况。
    方法:采用横断面观察设计。共有123名符合条件的成年人(占男性的46.34%,年龄范围,18-59y),8月至11月将COVID-19纳入研究,2022年。眼表疾病指数(OSDI),五项干眼症问卷(DEQ-5),医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS),和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)用于本研究。
    结果:无症状携带者的OSDI评分为6.82(1.25,15.91),轻度病例为7.35(2.50,18.38),复发病例为16.67(4.43,28.04),30.00%,35.56%,57.89%,分别评价为有DED症状(χ2=7.049,P=0.029)。DEQ-5评分在无症状携带者中从2.00(0,6.00)变化,3.00(0,8.00)在轻度病例,复发病例为8.00(5.00,10.00),27.50%,33.33%,55.26%,分别评估为有DED症状(χ2=8.532,P=0.014)。反复感染患者的临床焦虑(50.00%)和抑郁(47.37%)发生率也明显高于反复感染患者(χ2=24.541,P<0.001;χ2=30.871,P<0.001)。反复感染是OSDI得分高的危险因素[优势比,2.562;95%置信区间(CI),1.631-7.979;P=0.033]和DEQ-5得分(赔率比,3.353;95CI,1.038-8.834;P=0.043),而固定职业是OSDI得分的保护因素(赔率比,0.088;95CI,0.022-0.360;P=0.001)和DEQ-5得分(赔率比,0.126;95CI,0.039-0.405;P=0.001)。
    结论:复发的COVID-19患者有更严重的DED症状,焦虑,和抑郁症。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate dry eye disease (DED) symptomatology and mental health status in different COVID-19 patients.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional observational design was used. Totally 123 eligible adults (46.34% of men, age range, 18-59y) with COVID-19 included in the study from August to November, 2022. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Five-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) were used in this study.
    RESULTS: OSDI scores were 6.82 (1.25, 15.91) in asymptomatic carriers, 7.35 (2.50, 18.38) in mild cases, and 16.67 (4.43, 28.04) in recurrent cases, with 30.00%, 35.56%, and 57.89%, respectively evaluated as having DED symptoms (χ2=7.049, P=0.029). DEQ-5 score varied from 2.00 (0, 6.00) in asymptomatic carriers, 3.00 (0, 8.00) in mild cases, and 8.00 (5.00, 10.00) in recurrent cases, with 27.50%, 33.33%, and 55.26%, respectively assessed as having DED symptoms (χ2=8.532, P=0.014). The prevalence of clinical anxiety (50.00%) and depression (47.37%) symptoms were also significantly higher in patients with recurrent infection (χ2=24.541, P<0.001; χ2=30.871, P<0.001). Recurrent infection was a risk factor for high OSDI scores [odds ratio, 2.562; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.631-7.979; P=0.033] and DEQ-5 scores (odds ratio, 3.353; 95%CI, 1.038-8.834; P=0.043), whereas having a fixed occupation was a protective factor for OSDI scores (odds ratio, 0.088; 95%CI, 0.022-0.360; P=0.001) and DEQ-5 scores (odds ratio, 0.126; 95%CI, 0.039-0.405; P=0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recurrent COVID-19 have more severe symptoms of DED, anxiety, and depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肩关节置换术后治疗慢性人工关节感染(PJI)时,植入物和水泥的去除通常是追求,因为它们代表了潜在的感染病灶。然而,完全去除会增加发病率和损害骨储备,这对于实现稳定的翻修植入物很重要。这项研究的目的是比较保留水泥或硬件的患者与完全切除的患者在2期PJI翻修后的重复感染率。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2011年至2020年在两个机构进行的所有两阶段翻修全肩关节置换术(TSAs)感染,从两阶段翻修完成后至少随访两年。如果患者符合可能或明确感染的国际共识会议(ICM)标准,则将其包括在内2。对包括假体和水泥去除以及抗生素垫片放置在内的修订第一阶段后的术后X光片进行了审查,以评估保留的水泥或硬件。重复感染定义为在第二阶段翻修时使用在第一阶段翻修期间培养的相同生物进行的≥2个阳性培养物,或在再次符合ICM标准的患者进行两阶段翻修后重复手术感染可能或明确感染。将保留有水泥或硬件的患者的重复感染率与没有保留水泥或硬件的患者的感染率进行比较。
    结果:37例患者符合纳入标准,纳入分析。第一阶段翻修后,六名(16%)患者保留了骨水泥,一名(3%)患者保留了两个关节盂底板螺钉。在十例反复感染中,1例(10%)涉及保留的水泥/硬件。修订年龄(60.9±10.6vs.65.0±9.6,p=0.264),BMI(33.4±7.2vs.29.7±7.3,p=0.184),Charlson合并症指数(2(0-8)与3(0-6)p=0.289),男性(7vs.16,p=0.420)和糖尿病的存在(1vs.3,p=0.709)与重复感染无关。保留的水泥或硬件也与重复感染风险无关(1与6,OR=0.389,p=0.374)。
    结论:我们没有发现保留骨水泥或硬件的患者重复感染的风险增加。因此,我们认为,外科医生应考虑留下难以去除的水泥或硬件,并可能导致发病率增加和未来的并发症.
    BACKGROUND: When treating chronic prosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty, removal of the implants and cement is typically pursued because they represent a potential nidus for infection. However, complete removal can increase morbidity and compromise bone stock that is important for achieving stable revision implants. The purpose of this study is to compare the rates of repeat infection after 2-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection in patients who have retained cement or hardware compared to those who had complete removal.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all two-stage revision total shoulder arthroplasties performed for infection at 2 institutions between 2011 and 2020 with minimum 2-year follow-up from completion of the two-stage revision. Patients were included if they met the International Consensus Meeting criteria for probable or definite infection. Postoperative radiographs after the first-stage of the revision consisting of prosthesis and cement removal and placement of an antibiotic spacer were reviewed to evaluate for retained cement or hardware. Repeat infection was defined as either ≥2 positive cultures at the time of second-stage revision with the same organism cultured during the first-stage revision or repeat surgery for infection after the two-stage revision in patients that again met the International Consensus Meeting criteria for probable or definite infection. The rate of repeat infection among patients with retained cement or hardware was compared to the rate of infection among patients without retained cement or hardware.
    RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Six (16%) patients had retained cement and 1 patient (3%) had 2 retained broken glenoid baseplate screws after first-stage revision. Of the 10 cases of recurrent infection, 1 case (10%) involved retained cement/hardware. Age at revision (60.9 ± 10.6 vs. 65.0 ± 9.6, P = .264), body mass index (33.4 ± 7.2 vs. 29.7 ± 7.3, P = .184), Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 (0-8) vs. 3 (0-6), P = .289), male sex (7 vs. 16, P = .420), and presence of diabetes (1 vs. 3, P = .709) were not associated with repeat infection. Retained cement or hardware was also not associated with a repeat risk of infection (1 vs. 6, odds ratio = 0.389, P = .374).
    CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an increased risk of repeat infection in patients with retained cement or hardware compared to those without. Therefore, we believe that surgeons should consider leaving cement or hardware that is difficult to remove and may lead to increased morbidity and future complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    本文讨论了致力于尿路感染(UTI)与膀胱过度活动症(OAB)之间关系的关键研究成果。出版物的结果支持以下概念:UTI可能是某些患者OAB发展的未被重视的原因,反之亦然。该信息提出了关于OAB和UTI的治疗和诊断的许多问题。主要问题是抗生素的潜在用途,抗炎药,和其他治疗OAB患者的药物,以及在存在慢性复发性UTI的情况下使用使下尿路(LUT)功能正常化的疗法的基本原理。
    A discussion of key research findings dedicated to the relationship between urinary tract infection (UTI) and overactive bladder (OAB) is presented in the article. The results of the publications support the concept that UTI may be an underappreciated contributor to the development of OAB in some patients and vice versa. This information raises a number of questions regarding the treatment and diagnosis of OAB and UTI. The main question is the potential use of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and other drugs in the treatment of patients with OAB, as well as the rationale for the use of therapy that normalize lower urinary tract (LUT) function in the presence of chronic recurrent UTI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非β溶血性链球菌菌血症(NBHSB)患者存在感染性心内膜炎(IE)的风险。已描述患有心脏可植入电子设备(CIED)的患者患IE的风险增加。该研究的目的是描述一个基于人群的NBHSB和CIED患者队列以及与IE和复发NBHSB相关的变量。
    方法:从临床微生物学实验室收集了2015年至2018年在130万居民中血液培养中NBHSB的所有发作,隆德,瑞典。通过医疗记录,我们确定了在NBHSB期间发生CIED的患者,并收集了临床数据.患者在NBHSB后365天随访。
    结果:在79例CIED和NBHSB患者中,85例发作构成了队列。8例患者(10%)在第一次发作时被诊断为明确的IE,其中5人也有心脏瓣膜假体(HVP)。在39例患者(49%)中,进行了经食管超声心动图(TEE),其中6例指示IE。四名患者进行了CIED提取。24名患者在研究期间没有存活(30%)。四名患者反复感染了同一物种的NBHSB,其中3人患有HVP,在第一次发作期间接受TEE评估结果为阴性,在复发期间诊断为IE.
    结论:本研究未发现NBHSB和CIED患者发生IE的风险较高。大多数IE病例与同时发生的HVP同时发生。提出了一种管理算法。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with non-beta-hemolytic streptococcal bacteremia (NBHSB) are at risk of infective endocarditis (IE). Patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) have been described to have an increased risk of IE. The aim of the study was to describe a population-based cohort of patients with NBHSB and CIED and variables associated with IE and recurrent NBHSB.
    METHODS: All episodes with NBHSB in blood culture from 2015 to 2018 in a population of 1.3 million inhabitants were collected from the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Lund, Sweden. Through medical records, patients with CIED during NBHSB were identified and clinical data were collected. Patients were followed 365 days after NBHSB.
    RESULTS: Eighty-five episodes in 79 patients with CIED and NBHSB constituted the cohort. Eight patients (10%) were diagnosed with definite IE during the first episode, five of whom also had heart valve prosthesis (HVP). In 39 patients (49%) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed of which six indicated IE. Four patients had the CIED extracted. Twenty-four patients did not survive (30%) the study period. Four patients had a recurrent infection with NBHSB with the same species, three of whom had HVP and had been evaluated with TEE with a negative result during the first episode and diagnosed with IE during the recurrency.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study did not find a high risk of IE in patients with NBHSB and CIED. Most cases of IE were in conjunction with a simultaneous HVP. A management algorithm is suggested.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿脑膜炎是一种与高死亡率和神经系统后遗症相关的破坏性疾病。大肠杆菌是足月婴儿中新生儿脑膜炎的第二最常见原因(本文中的NMEC)和早产新生儿中脑膜炎的最常见原因。这里,我们调查了一组分布在1974-2020年的58株NMEC分离株的基因组相关性,这些分离株来自7个不同的地理区域.我们显示NMEC由不同的序列类型(ST)组成,以ST95(34.5%)和ST1193(15.5%)最常见。在所有分离株中,没有单一毒力基因谱是保守的;然而,编码菌毛粘附素的基因,铁采集系统,K1胶囊,O18,O75和O2型抗原最普遍。我们收集的抗生素抗性基因很少出现。我们还监测了三名患者的感染动态,这些患者尽管根据抗菌谱和耐药基因型进行了适当的抗生素治疗,但仍由原始感染分离株引起的复发侵袭性感染。这些患者表现出严重的肠道菌群失调。在一个病人中,在第二次感染发作时和治疗后,粪便菌群中也检测到了致病NMEC分离株.因此,尽管抗生素是NMEC治疗的标准护理,我们的数据表明,如果不能消除位于肠道的NMEC,可能会导致出现难治性储库,该储库可能会引发复发感染.
    Neonatal meningitis is a devastating disease associated with high mortality and neurological sequelae. Escherichia coli is the second most common cause of neonatal meningitis in full-term infants (herein NMEC) and the most common cause of meningitis in preterm neonates. Here, we investigated the genomic relatedness of a collection of 58 NMEC isolates spanning 1974-2020 and isolated from seven different geographic regions. We show NMEC are comprised of diverse sequence types (STs), with ST95 (34.5%) and ST1193 (15.5%) the most common. No single virulence gene profile was conserved in all isolates; however, genes encoding fimbrial adhesins, iron acquisition systems, the K1 capsule, and O antigen types O18, O75, and O2 were most prevalent. Antibiotic resistance genes occurred infrequently in our collection. We also monitored the infection dynamics in three patients that suffered recrudescent invasive infection caused by the original infecting isolate despite appropriate antibiotic treatment based on antibiogram profile and resistance genotype. These patients exhibited severe gut dysbiosis. In one patient, the causative NMEC isolate was also detected in the fecal flora at the time of the second infection episode and after treatment. Thus, although antibiotics are the standard of care for NMEC treatment, our data suggest that failure to eliminate the causative NMEC that resides intestinally can lead to the existence of a refractory reservoir that may seed recrudescent infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏可植入电子设备(CIED)和金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症(SAB)的患者有感染CIED的风险,口袋感染或心内膜炎。为了避免治疗失败,指南建议在所有SAB病例中均应进行CIED的提取,但最近的研究表明提取率低,复发风险低.该研究的目的是描述一个瑞典基于人群的CIED和SAB患者队列,提取率,治疗失败被测量为复发性SAB。
    在卡罗林斯卡实验室数据库中确定患有SAB的患者,为190万人口服务,从2015年1月至2019年12月,我们与瑞典ICD和起搏器登记处进行了匹配.包括CIED和SAB患者。从医疗记录中收集临床数据。
    确定了274名患者的队列,其中38名患者(14%)进行了CIED提取。与拔牙相关的因素是年龄较低,较低的Charlson合并症指数,自ED植入以来的时间较短,和非医院获取,但不是死亡率。没有患者接受终身抗生素治疗。16例(6%)患者在一年内复发SAB,接受萃取的患者中有2例(5%),未接受CIED萃取的患者中有14例(6%)。在复发发作期间,发现14例患者中有3例患有明确的心内膜炎。
    尽管提取率低,很少有复发。我们建议如果口袋感染,可以省略CIED的提取,CIED的变化,或未检测到明确的心内膜炎。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) and Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) are at risk of having CIED infection, pocket infection or endocarditis. To avoid treatment failures, guidelines recommend that the CIED should be extracted in all cases of SAB butrecent studies indicate low extraction rates and low risk of relapse. The aim of the study was to describe a Swedish population-based cohort of patients with CIED and SAB, the rate of extraction, and treatment failure measured as recurrent SAB.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients identified to have SAB in the Karolinska Laboratory database, serving a population of 1.9 million, from January 2015 through December 2019 were matched to the Swedish ICD and Pacemaker Registry. Patients with CIED and SAB were included. Clinical data were collected from medical records.
    UNASSIGNED: A cohort of 274 patients was identified and 38 patients (14%)had the CIED extracted. Factors associated with extraction were lower age, lower Charlson comorbidity index, shorter time since CIED implantation, and non-nosocomial acquisition, but not mortality. No patient was put on lifelong antibiotic treatment. Sixteen patients (6%) had a recurrent SAB within one year, two in patients subjected to extraction (5%) and 14 in patients not subjected to CIED-extraction (6%). Three of the 14 patients were found to have definite endocarditis during the recurrent episode.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite a low extraction rate, there were few recurrences. We suggest that extraction of the CIED might be omitted if pocket infection, changes on the CIED, or definite endocarditis are not detected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假体周围感染(PJI)仍然是全关节置换术后最常见的并发症之一。管理具有挑战性,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,是医疗系统的财政负担。慢性PJI的2阶段管理失败并不少见。重复感染通常是多微生物的,多重耐药微生物,或新的生物。优化索引2阶段修订的成功是防止任何后续管理选项失败的最大方法,需要一个强大的基于团队的方法。
    Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most common complications after total joint arthroplasty. It is challenging to manage, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and is a financial burden on the health care system. Failure of 2-stage management for chronic PJI is not uncommon. Repeat infections are oftentimes polymicrobial, multiple drug-resistant microorganisms, or new organisms. Optimizing the success of index 2-stage revision is the greatest prevention against failure of any subsequent management options and requires a robust team-based approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是主要的公共卫生威胁。高达40%的CDI患者经历复发性CDI(rCDI),这与发病率增加有关。本研究旨在通过详细了解导致CDI的不同因素来定义高危人群。rCDI,和CDI相关的发病率和CDI的时间。
    方法:我们对MEDLINE(使用PubMed)和EMBASE在2016年1月1日至2022年11月11日之间发表的相关文章进行了系统文献综述(SLR),涵盖了美国人群。
    结果:在确定的1324篇文章中,151符合预定的纳入标准。在普通人群中,高龄患者可能是原发性CDI的危险因素。在10项研究中的9项研究中确定了显著的风险估计。在通常在较早年龄诊断为合并症的特定人群中,年龄较小,如肠道疾病和癌症。在合并症方面,既定的感染因素,肾病,肝病,心血管疾病,和肠道疾病以及几个新的因素(包括贫血,液体和电解质紊乱,和凝血障碍)可能是原发性CDI的危险因素。关于糖尿病的数据,癌症,和肥胖混合在一起。其他主要的CDI危险因素是抗生素,质子泵抑制剂,女性性别,之前住院,以及住院时间。rCDI也确定了类似的因素,但证据有限.高龄可能是死亡的危险因素。原发性CDI的时间因人群而异:接受干细胞移植的患者为2-3周,接受手术的患者在3周内,通常在实体器官移植后超过3周。
    结论:本SLR使用最新证据来定义与CDI相关的最重要因素,确认那些已经建立的,并突出显示新的,可以帮助识别高危患者人群。
    BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health threat. Up to 40% of patients with CDI experience recurrent CDI (rCDI), which is associated with increased morbidity. This study aimed to define an at-risk population by obtaining a detailed understanding of the different factors leading to CDI, rCDI, and CDI-related morbidity and of time to CDI.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of MEDLINE (using PubMed) and EMBASE for relevant articles published between January 1, 2016, and November 11, 2022, covering the US population.
    RESULTS: Of the 1324 articles identified, 151 met prespecified inclusion criteria. Advanced patient age was a likely risk factor for primary CDI within a general population, with significant risk estimates identified in nine of 10 studies. Older age was less important in specific populations with comorbidities usually diagnosed at earlier age, such as bowel disease and cancer. In terms of comorbidities, the established factors of infection, kidney disease, liver disease, cardiovascular disease, and bowel disease along with several new factors (including anemia, fluid and electrolyte disorders, and coagulation disorders) were likely risk factors for primary CDI. Data on diabetes, cancer, and obesity were mixed. Other primary CDI risk factors were antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, female sex, prior hospitalization, and the length of stay in hospital. Similar factors were identified for rCDI, but evidence was limited. Older age was a likely risk factor for mortality. Timing of primary CDI varied depending on the population: 2-3 weeks in patients receiving stem cell transplants, within 3 weeks for patients undergoing surgery, and generally more than 3 weeks following solid organ transplant.
    CONCLUSIONS: This SLR uses recent evidence to define the most important factors associated with CDI, confirming those that are well established and highlighting new ones that could help to identify patient populations at high risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号