rapid diagnostic tests

快速诊断测试
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在评估Ag-RDT和RT-qPCR在检测细胞培养物中传染性SARS-CoV-2方面的性能,因为与病毒分离相比,它们的诊断测试准确性(DTA)仍然未知。我们搜索了截至2021年12月15日的三个数据库进行DTA研究。双变量模型用于综合估计。使用QUADAS-2/C评估偏倚风险。鉴定了使用细胞培养和至少一种分子测试的20项研究(2605个呼吸样品)。所有研究在至少一个领域都有高或不清楚的偏倚风险。三个比较DTA研究报告了针对细胞培养物的Ag-RDT和RT-qPCR的结果。两项研究仅针对细胞培养物评估了RT-qPCR。15项研究针对RT-qPCR阳性样品中作为参考标准的细胞培养物评估了Ag-RDT。对于Ag-RDT,总敏感性为93%(95%CI78;98%),特异性为87%(95%CI70;95%).对于RT-qPCR,综合敏感性(连续性校正)为98%(95%CI95;99%),特异性为45%(95%CI28;63%).在依赖于RT-qPCR阳性子样本的研究中(n=15),Ag-RDT的总敏感性为93%(95%CI92;93%),特异性为63%(95%CI63;63%).Ag-RDT显示中等高灵敏度,根据病毒分离,检测大多数但不是所有证明具有传染性的样品。尽管RT-qPCR在研究中表现出高灵敏度,其指示感染性的低特异性提出了其在所有临床环境中的普遍优越性的问题。由于存在偏见的风险,研究结果应谨慎解释,异质性和不完善的传染性参考标准。
    We aimed to assess the performance of Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR with regard to detecting infectious SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures, as their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) compared to virus isolation remains largely unknown. We searched three databases up to 15 December 2021 for DTA studies. The bivariate model was used to synthesise the estimates. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/C. Twenty studies (2605 respiratory samples) using cell culture and at least one molecular test were identified. All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Three comparative DTA studies reported results on Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR against cell culture. Two studies evaluated RT-qPCR against cell culture only. Fifteen studies evaluated Ag-RDT against cell culture as reference standard in RT-qPCR-positive samples. For Ag-RDT, summary sensitivity was 93% (95% CI 78; 98%) and specificity 87% (95% CI 70; 95%). For RT-qPCR, summary sensitivity (continuity-corrected) was 98% (95% CI 95; 99%) and specificity 45% (95% CI 28; 63%). In studies relying on RT-qPCR-positive subsamples (n = 15), the summary sensitivity of Ag-RDT was 93% (95% CI 92; 93%) and specificity 63% (95% CI 63; 63%). Ag-RDT show moderately high sensitivity, detecting most but not all samples demonstrated to be infectious based on virus isolation. Although RT-qPCR exhibits high sensitivity across studies, its low specificity to indicate infectivity raises the question of its general superiority in all clinical settings. Study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias, heterogeneity and the imperfect reference standard for infectivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The global malaria epidemic is still severe. Because of simple procedures, rapid detection and accuracy results, rapid diagnostic test (RDT) has become the most important and the most widely used diagnostic tool for malaria prevention and control. However, deletions in the RDT target Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3 (Pfhrp2/3) genes may cause false-negative results of RDT, which has been included as one of the four biological threats to global malaria elimination. This article reviews the applications of RDT in the global malaria diagnosis, analyzes the threats and challenges caused by Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, proposes methods for monitoring Pfhrp2/3 gene deletion, and summarizes the causes and countermeasures of negative RDT detections, so as to provide insights into consolidation of malaria elimination achievements in China and contributions to global malaria elimination.
    [摘要] 全球疟疾流行依然严峻, 疟疾快速诊断试纸条 (rapid diagnostic test, RDT) 操作简便、检测快速、结果准确, 已成为当前疟 疾防控中最重要和最广泛使用的诊断工具。但RDT靶标恶性疟 原虫富组氨酸蛋白2/3 (Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein 2/3, Pfhrp2/3) 基因缺失可导致RDT产生假阴性检测结果, 被 WHO列为全球消除疟疾的四大生物学挑战之一。本文通过回顾 RDT在全球疟疾诊断中的应用, 分析Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失带来的威 胁与挑战、提出Pfhrp2/3 基因缺失的监测方法、总结RDT检测阴性 的原因与对策, 为巩固我国消除疟疾成果、助力全球消除疟疾提 供参考。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在赤道几内亚,只有54%的艾滋病毒感染者知道自己的艾滋病毒状况。该国没有用于早期诊断或监测感染的确认或分子诊断技术。如果将快速诊断测试用作确认技术,则可以引起假阳性诊断。我们的研究旨在通过分析假阳性诊断率来确定赤道几内亚早期HIV诊断的挑战,诊断和治疗延迟,以及接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者的治疗失败。
    方法:从2019-2022年,341名儿童的干血,赤道几内亚的青少年和成年人通过快速诊断检测被诊断为HIV阳性,并从Bata收集了54名暴露于艾滋病毒的婴儿,并将其送往马德里,以确认分子感染艾滋病毒(XpertHIV-1Qual,造父变菌)和/或血清学确认测定(Geenius-HIV-1/2,BioRad)。HIV诊断延迟(CD4<350个细胞/mm3),在病毒定量(XpertVLHIV-1,Cepheid)后,还研究了诊断时的晚期疾病(CD4<200个细胞/mm3)和抗逆转录病毒治疗延迟和失败(病毒血症>1,000RNA-HIV-1拷贝/ml)。
    结果:在5%的分析样本中发现了假阳性诊断。在赤道几内亚,90.5%的先前诊断的患者和3.7%的未在实地诊断的艾滋病毒暴露儿童中确认了艾滋病毒感染。每个新的HIV患者中有三分之二的诊断延迟,三分之一的人患有晚期疾病。28.3%的患者出现治疗延迟,青少年/成人的可能性是儿童的四倍左右。232名接受治疗的患者中有一半以上(56%)出现治疗失败,儿童/青少年明显高于成人(82.9%/90%vs.45.6%,p<0.001)。
    结论:我们确定了赤道几内亚早期HIV诊断的一些挑战,揭示出假阳性诊断率很高,诊断/治疗延迟,以及需要解决的治疗失败。实施更准确的快速诊断技术和验证性测试,除了改善获得护理的机会,治疗,意识,和筛选,将有助于控制艾滋病毒在该国的传播。
    BACKGROUND: In Equatorial Guinea, only 54 % of people living with HIV know their HIV status. There are no confirmatory or molecular diagnostic techniques for early diagnosis or monitoring of infection in the country. Rapid diagnostic tests can induce false-positive diagnoses if used as a confirmatory technique. Our study aimed to identify the challenges of early HIV diagnosis in Equatorial Guinea by analyzing the rate of false positive diagnoses, diagnostic and therapeutic delays, and treatment failures among those on antiretroviral therapy.
    METHODS: From 2019-2022, dried blood from 341 children, adolescents and adults diagnosed in Equatorial Guinea as HIV-positive by rapid diagnostic testing, and from 54 HIV-exposed infants were collected in Bata and sent to Madrid to confirm HIV-infection by molecular (Xpert HIV-1Qual, Cepheid) and/or serological confirmatory assays (Geenius-HIV-1/2, BioRad). HIV diagnostic delay (CD4 <350cells/mm3), advanced disease at diagnosis (CD4 <200cells/mm3) and antiretroviral treatment delay and failure (viraemia >1,000RNA-HIV-1-copies/ml) were also studied after viral quantification (XpertVL HIV-1, Cepheid).
    RESULTS: False-positive diagnoses were identified in 5 % of analysed samples. HIV infection was confirmed in 90.5 % of previously diagnosed patients in Equatorial Guinea and 3.7 % of HIV-exposed children undiagnosed in the field. Two-thirds of each new HIV patient had delayed diagnosis, and one-third had advanced disease. Treatment delay occurred in 28.3 % of patients, being around four times more likely in adolescents/adults than children. More than half (56 %) of 232 treated patients presented treatment failure, being significantly higher in children/adolescents than in adults (82.9 %/90 % vs. 45.6 %, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We identified some challenges of early HIV diagnosis in Equatorial Guinea, revealing a high rate of false positive diagnoses, diagnostic/treatment delays, and treatment failures that need to be addressed. The implementation of more accurate rapid diagnostic techniques and confirmatory tests, along with improving access to care, treatment, awareness, and screening, would contribute to controlling the spread of HIV in the country.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:南部非洲国家是全球艾滋病毒和梅毒负担最大的国家,在育龄妇女中患病率很高。虽然产前筛查是护理标准,梅毒筛查通常落后于HIV筛查。我们旨在评估两种商业化的双重HIV/梅毒护理点测试(POCT)的性能和操作特征,以同时进行母体HIV/梅毒筛查。
    方法:在南非和赞比亚的五个初级保健中心(PHCs)对HIV/梅毒双重POCT(SDBioline和Chembio)进行了基于临床的评估。将使用毛细血管指刺血的POCT结果与参考实验室梅毒和HIV血清学测定进行比较。
    结果:招募了三千四百十二名年龄≥18岁的孕妇。螺旋体抗体阳性和HIV感染的患病率为3.7%至9.9%(n=253)和17.8%至21.3%(n=643),分别。与参考测定相比,SDBioline对梅毒的合并敏感性为66.0%(95CI57.7-73.4),Chembio为67.9%(95CI58.2-76.3)。两种POCT对梅毒的集合特异性均高于98%。SDBioline和Chembio测定的灵敏度分别为78.0%(95CI68.6-85.7)和81.0%(95CI71.9-88.2),分别与活性梅毒病例定义的螺旋体试验阳性,血浆反应素快速滴度≥8进行比较。基于两种测定的梅毒的各种患病率估计的阴性预测值(NPV)范围为97%至99%。SDBioline对HIV的合并敏感性为92.1%(95CI89.4-94.2);Chembio为91.5%(95CI88.2-93.9)。SDBioline的HIV合并特异性为97.2%(95CI94.8-98.5),Chembio的合并特异性为96.7%(95CI95.1-97.8)。基于两种测定的HIV的各种患病率估计的NPV约为98%。大多数参与的女性(91%)更喜欢双重POCT,而不是两个单独的POCT,以治疗艾滋病毒和梅毒。医疗保健提供者对两种检测方法在PHC水平的实用性给予了有利的反馈.
    结论:基于提高梅毒产前筛查覆盖率的需要,可将双重HIV/梅毒POCT有效纳入产前检测算法,以加强努力消除这些感染的母婴传播.
    BACKGROUND: Southern African countries have the largest global burden of HIV and syphilis, with a high prevalence among women of reproductive age. Although antenatal screening is standard of care, syphilis screening has generally lagged behind HIV screening. We aimed to evaluate the performance and operational characteristics of two commercial dual HIV/syphilis point-of-care tests (POCTs) for simultaneous maternal HIV/syphilis screening.
    METHODS: A clinic-based evaluation of dual HIV/syphilis POCTs (SD Bioline and Chembio) was conducted at five primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in South Africa and Zambia. POCT results using capillary fingerprick blood were compared to reference laboratory syphilis and HIV serological assays.
    RESULTS: Three thousand four hundred twelve consenting pregnant women aged ≥ 18 years were enrolled. The prevalence of treponemal antibody seropositivity and HIV infection ranged from 3.7 to 9.9% (n = 253) and 17.8 to 21.3% (n = 643), respectively. Pooled sensitivity for syphilis compared to the reference assay was 66.0% (95%CI 57.7-73.4) with SD Bioline and 67.9% (95%CI 58.2-76.3) with Chembio. Pooled specificity for syphilis was above 98% with both POCTs. The sensitivities of SD Bioline and Chembio assays were 78.0% (95%CI 68.6-85.7) and 81.0% (95%CI 71.9-88.2), respectively compared to an active syphilis case definition of treponemal test positive with a rapid plasma reagin titre of ≥ 8. The negative predictive values (NPVs) based on various prevalence estimates for syphilis with both assays ranged from 97 to 99%. The pooled sensitivity for HIV was 92.1% (95%CI 89.4-94.2) with SD Bioline; and 91.5% (95%CI 88.2-93.9) with Chembio. The pooled specificities for HIV were 97.2% (95%CI 94.8-98.5) with SD Bioline and 96.7% (95%CI 95.1-97.8) with Chembio. The NPV based on various prevalence estimates for HIV with both assays was approximately 98%. Most participating women (91%) preferred dual POCTs over two single POCTs for HIV and syphilis, and healthcare providers gave favourable feedback on the utility of both assays at PHC level.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the need to improve antenatal screening coverage for syphilis, dual HIV/syphilis POCTs could be effectively incorporated into antenatal testing algorithms to enhance efforts towards elimination of mother-to-child transmission of these infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是开发一种快速,准确的成簇的规则间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)/Cas12a的基于分子诊断方法(使用CRISPR快速鉴定真菌病,RID-MyC测定)以检测真菌核酸,并将其与现有的常规真菌学方法进行比较,以诊断真菌性角膜炎(FK)。
    本研究是一项开发和验证研究,重点是创建和评估RID-MyC测定作为FK的新型诊断方式。
    参与者包括在印度南部的3个三级护理机构中出现疑似微生物性角膜炎的142个人。
    RID-MyC分析利用靶向18S核糖体RNA基因的重组酶聚合酶扩增进行等温扩增,随后进行CRISPR/Cas12a反应。这是以显微镜为基准的,文化,和聚合酶链反应诊断FK。
    主要结果测量集中在RID-MyC测定在检测真菌核酸中的分析灵敏度和特异性。次要结果测量了测定对FK的诊断灵敏度和特异性,包括其与传统诊断方法的一致性。
    RID-MyC测定在4种常见真菌物种中表现出13.3至16.6个基因组拷贝的检测限。在微生物性角膜炎患者中,RID-MyC分析显示与显微镜检查基本一致(kappa=0.714),与培养物一致(kappa=0.399).该测定法显示出93.27%的灵敏度(95%置信区间[CI],86.62%-97.25%),FK诊断的特异性为89.47%(95%CI,66.86%-98.70%),中位诊断时间为50分钟(范围,35-124分钟)。
    RID-MyC分析,利用CRISPR-Cas12a技术,为FK提供高诊断精度。其潜在的护理点使用可以加快和提高真菌诊断的准确性,为当前的诊断挑战提出了一个有希望的解决方案。
    专有或商业披露可在本文末尾的脚注和披露中找到。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to develop a rapid and accurate clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas12a-based molecular diagnostic assay (Rapid Identification of Mycoses using CRISPR, RID-MyC assay) to detect fungal nucleic acids and to compare it with existing conventional mycologic methods for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis (FK).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was structured as a development and validation study focusing on the creation and assessment of the RID-MyC assay as a novel diagnostic modality for FK.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants comprised 142 individuals presenting with suspected microbial keratitis at 3 tertiary care institutions in South India.
    UNASSIGNED: The RID-MyC assay utilized recombinase polymerase amplification targeting the 18S ribosomal RNA gene for isothermal amplification, followed by a CRISPR/Cas12a reaction. This was benchmarked against microscopy, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of FK.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome measures focused on the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the RID-MyC assay in detecting fungal nucleic acids. Secondary outcomes measured the assay\'s diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for FK, including its concordance with conventional diagnostic methods.
    UNASSIGNED: The RID-MyC assay exhibited a detection limit ranging from 13.3 to 16.6 genomic copies across 4 common fungal species. In patients with microbial keratitis, the RID-MyC assay showed substantial agreement with microscopy (kappa = 0.714) and fair agreement with culture (kappa = 0.399). The assay demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.27% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.62%-97.25%) and a specificity of 89.47% (95% CI, 66.86%-98.70%) for FK diagnosis, with a median diagnostic time of 50 minutes (range, 35-124 minutes).
    UNASSIGNED: The RID-MyC assay, utilizing CRISPR-Cas12a technology, offers high diagnostic accuracy for FK. Its potential for point-of-care use could expedite and enhance the precision of fungal diagnostics, presenting a promising solution to current diagnostic challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建议在疟疾治疗前进行普遍诊断测试,以解决青蒿素为基础的联合疗法过度治疗以及选择压力和耐药性风险增加的问题,并且使用疟疾快速诊断测试(MRDT)是一项关键策略,尤其是在初级卫生保健(PHC)工作者中,他们几乎没有获得和使用其他形式的诊断测试.然而,只有当卫生工作者对MRDT阴性结果没有处方抗疟疾药物做出适当反应时,MRDT的使用才能纠正过度治疗.这项研究评估了MRDT和抗疟疾药物处方的使用,和预测因子,在Ebonyi州的PHC工人中,尼日利亚。
    方法:我们进行了分析性横断面问卷调查,在参与疟疾诊断和治疗的PHC工作者中,从2020年1月15日至2020年2月5日。通过结构化的自我管理问卷收集数据,并使用描述性统计以及双变量和多变量广义估计方程进行分析。
    结果:在接受调查的490名参与者中:81.4%的人通常/常规使用MRDT进行疟疾诊断,18.6%的人通常仅使用临床症状;78.0%的人使用MRDT对所有/大多数怀疑患有疟疾的患者进行疟疾诊断,而22.0%的人使用MRDT对无/少数/某些患者使用MRDT;74.9%的抗疟疾药物处方效果良好/不确定的预测指标:MRDT的使用在美国总统疟疾倡议(PMI支持的医疗机构)支持的医疗机构中工作;良好的抗疟疾药物处方实践对MRDT有很好的看法,对疟疾诊断和MRDT有很好的了解,作为一名健康服务员,在PMI支持的医疗机构工作,和年龄的增加;对MRDT阴性结果的适当反应对MRDT有很好的评价。
    结论:证据表明,并强调要考虑的因素,在Ebonyi州的PHC工作人员中,为最佳使用MRDT和抗疟疾药物处方实践采取进一步的政策行动和干预措施,尼日利亚,和类似的设置。
    BACKGROUND: The recommendation of universal diagnostic testing before malaria treatment aimed to address the problem of over-treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy and the heightened risk of selection pressure and drug resistance and the use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (MRDT) was a key strategy, particularly among primary healthcare (PHC) workers whose access to and use of other forms of diagnostic testing were virtually absent. However, the use of MRDT can only remedy over-treatment when health workers respond appropriately to negative MRDT results by not prescribing anti-malarial drugs. This study assessed the use of MRDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices, and the predictors, among PHC workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.
    METHODS: We conducted an analytical cross-sectional questionnaire survey, among consenting PHC workers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of malaria, from January 15, 2020 to February 5, 2020. Data was collected via structured self-administered questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics and bivariate and multivariate generalized estimating equations.
    RESULTS: Of the 490 participants surveyed: 81.4% usually/routinely used MRDT for malaria diagnosis and 18.6% usually used only clinical symptoms; 78.0% used MRDT for malaria diagnosis for all/most of their patients suspected of having malaria in the preceding month while 22.0% used MRDT for none/few/some; 74.9% had good anti-malarial drug prescription practice; and 68.0% reported appropriate response to negative MRDT results (never/rarely prescribed anti-malarial drugs for the patients) while 32.0% reported inappropriate response (sometimes/often/always prescribed anti-malarial drugs). The identified predictor(s): of the use of MRDT was working in health facilities supported by the United States\' President\'s Malaria Initiative (PMI-supported health facilities); of good anti-malarial drug prescription practice were having good opinion about MRDT, having good knowledge about malaria diagnosis and MRDT, being a health attendant, working in PMI-supported health facilities, and increase in age; and of appropriate response to negative MRDT results was having good opinion about MRDT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The evidence indicate the need for, and highlight factors to be considered by, further policy actions and interventions for optimal use of MRDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices among the PHC workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria, and similar settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    梅毒快速检测在全球卫生战略中起着至关重要的作用,解决及时准确诊断的迫切需要,特别是在资源有限的环境中。尽管它们实用,这些测试通常缺乏彻底的验证,导致对其功效和可靠性的担忧。这项研究旨在评估现场梅毒Ab组合快速测试(Fd和Ff)的两个原型,并将其性能与已建立的化学发光微粒免疫测定(CMIA)方法进行比较。采用反向算法方法,这项研究分析了450份血清样本,包括梅毒患者,健康的个体,和有潜在交叉反应的病例。然后将快速检测试剂盒的结果与CMIA的结果相关联,RPR,和TPPA滴度。结果表明,原型Fd的灵敏度为100.0%,特异性为98.8%,阳性预测值(PPV)为8.4%,阴性预测值(NPV)为100.00%,准确率为98.8%。同样,原型Ff表现出100.0%的灵敏度,但特异性稍高,为99.6%,PPV为21.5%,NPV为100.0%,准确率为99.6%。此外,现场梅毒Ab组合快速测试的原型Fd和Ff均显示出有效的诊断工具,在各种CMIA中为临床医生提供清晰直接的解释,RPR和TPPA滴度情况。现场梅毒Ab组合快速测试原型,Fd和Ff,表现出高灵敏度和特异性,与CMIA方法相当。有效性突出了它们对梅毒筛查的适用性,特别是在非实验室设置或需要立即结果的情况下。这些原型的验证支持它们整合到当前的梅毒诊断算法中,可能有助于改善公共卫生结果。
    Rapid syphilis testing plays a crucial role in global health strategies, addressing the urgent need for prompt and accurate diagnostics, especially in settings with limited resources. Despite their practical utility, these tests often lack thorough validation, leading to concerns about their efficacy and reliability. This study aims to evaluate two prototypes of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test (Fd and Ff) and compare their performance with the established chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method. Employing a reverse algorithm approach, the study analyzed 450 serum samples, including those from syphilis patients, healthy individuals, and cases with potential cross-reactions. Results of the rapid test kit were then correlated with CMIA findings, RPR, and TPPA titers. The results showed that prototype Fd exhibited a sensitivity of 100.0%, specificity of 98.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 8.4%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 100.00% and accuracy of 98.8%. Similarly, prototype Ff exhibited sensitivity of 100.0%, but with a slightly higher specificity of 99.6%, PPV of 21.5%, NPV of 100.0% and accuracy of 99.6%. Moreover, both prototypes Fd and Ff of the Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test demonstrated significant efficacy diagnostic tool, offering clear and straightforward interpretation for clinicians in varied CMIA, RPR and TPPA titer scenarios. The Onsite Syphilis Ab Combo Rapid Test prototypes, Fd and Ff, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, comparable to CMIA methods. The effectiveness highlights their suitability for syphilis screening, particularly in non-laboratory settings or situations requiring immediate results. The validation of these prototypes supports their integration into current syphilis diagnostic algorithms, potentially contributing to improved public health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:全球,估计每年有290万例霍乱病例。早期发现霍乱疫情对于病例管理资源分配和提供有针对性的干预措施以阻止霍乱传播至关重要。在资源有限的地区,如刚果民主共和国东部,通过细菌培养分析霍乱粪便样本的实验室能力通常有限。因此,霍乱快速诊断检测(RDTs)是在医疗机构中快速检测霍乱粪便样本的一种有前景的工具.我们的目标是与霍乱弧菌的细菌培养和聚合酶链反应(PCR)相比,评估晶体VCO1RDT用于霍乱检测。
    方法:从2020年3月至2022年12月,收集了刚果民主共和国东部布卡武94个医疗机构收治的644名腹泻患者的粪便样本。通过CrystalVCO1RDT分析霍乱,并通过细菌培养和PCR分析霍乱弧菌O1。
    结果:26%的腹泻患者(166/644)通过RDT检查,粪便样本对霍乱呈阳性,24%(152/644)的粪便样本通过细菌培养或PCR检测霍乱弧菌O1阳性。通过直接测试,CrystalVCO1RDT的总体特异性和敏感性为94%(95%置信区间[CI]:92%-96%)和90%(95%CI,84%-94%),分别,当与细菌培养或PCR的阳性结果进行比较时。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,CrystalVCO1RDT为撒哈拉以南非洲霍乱流行环境中的霍乱监测提供了一个有希望的工具。
    OBJECTIVE: Globally, there are estimated to be 2.9 million cholera cases annually. Early detection of cholera outbreaks is crucial for resource allocation for case management and for targeted interventions to be delivered to stop the spread of cholera. In resource limited settings such as Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), there is often limited laboratory capacity for analysing stool samples for cholera by bacterial culture. Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for cholera present a promising tool to rapidly test stool samples in a health facility setting for cholera. Our objective is to evaluate the Crystal VC O1 RDT for cholera detection compared with bacterial culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Vibrio cholerae.
    METHODS: From March 2020 to December 2022, stool samples were collected from 644 diarrhoea patients admitted to 94 health facilities in Bukavu in Eastern DRC. Patient stool samples were analysed by Crystal VC O1 RDT for cholera and by bacterial culture and PCR for V. cholerae O1.
    RESULTS: Twenty six percent of diarrhoea patients (166/644) had stool samples positive for cholera by RDT, and 24% (152/644) had stool samples positive for V. cholerae O1 by bacterial culture or PCR. The overall specificity and sensitivity of the Crystal VC O1 RDT by direct testing was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-96%) and 90% (95% CI, 84%-94%), respectively, when compared with either a positive result by bacterial culture or PCR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the Crystal VC O1 RDT presents a promising tool for cholera surveillance in this cholera endemic setting in sub-Saharan Africa.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与分子检测(核酸检测)相比,丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原(HCVcAg)检测可以简化并降低HCV感染确认的成本。我们试行了HCVcAg检测,以确认活动性感染。该研究于2022年6月至12月在伊斯兰堡的警察和普通民众中进行,巴基斯坦18岁及以上。使用快速诊断测试(RDT)对所有同意的参与者进行HCV抗体的初始筛查。检测阳性的人静脉血样本检测为HCVcAg,血小板和天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)。HCVcAg值≥3fmol/L的人被定义为病毒血症,他们接受了直接作用抗病毒(DAA)药物治疗,sofosbuvir和daclatasvir.计算每个HCV感染者的天冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比率指数(APRI),APRI评分<1.5的患者接受治疗12周,而APRI≥1.5的患者接受了24周的治疗。共有15628人使用RDT进行了抗HCV筛查,643人(4.1%)检测呈阳性。在399/643(62.1%)中发现了≥3fmol/L的HCVcAg值,所有人都被提供并接受了治疗。在接受治疗的人中,273/399(68.4%)返回用于后续SVR,在261/273中未检测到HCVcAg,治愈率为95.6%。试点研究证明了使用RDT进行筛查和HCVcAg确认感染和治愈测试来达到和治疗城市人口的有效性。
    Hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVcAg) testing can simplify and decrease costs of HCV infection confirmation compared to molecular testing (nucleic acid testing). We piloted HCVcAg testing for the confirmation of active infection. The study was conducted during June through December 2022 among the police and the general population of Islamabad, Pakistan age 18 years and older. Initial screening for HCV antibody was conducted using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for all consenting participants. Those who tested positive had venous blood samples tested for HCVcAg, platelets and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Persons with HCVcAg values ≥3 fmol/L were defined as viremic, and they were offered treatment with direct acting antiviral (DAA) medications, sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) was calculated for each HCV infected person, and those with an APRI score <1.5 received treatment for 12 weeks, while those with APRI ≥ to 1.5 received 24 weeks of treatment. A total of 15,628 persons were screened for anti-HCV using RDT and 643 (4.1%) tested positive. HCVcAg values of ≥3 fmol/L was found in 399/643 (62.1%), and all were offered and accepted treatment. Of those treated, 273/399 (68.4%) returned for a follow-up SVR and HCVcAg was not detected in 261/273, a 95.6% cure rate. The pilot study demonstrated the effectiveness of reaching and treating an urban population using RDT for screening and HCVcAg for confirmation of infection and test of cure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    病毒感染是大多数呼吸道感染(RTI)的原因。这项回顾性研究评估了使用多重XpertXpressCoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒在实验室诊断由最相关病毒引起的RTI中的优势。
    数据来自2021年11月至2023年5月之间使用XpertXpress流感/RSV试剂盒测试的任何样本的医疗记录,XpertXpress流感套件,XpertXpressSARS-CoV-2套件,和XpertXpressCoV-2/流感/RSVplus套件。
    使用FluPCR试剂盒在8.5%(55/649)的样品中检测到甲型流感病毒,使用CoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒在4.9%(123/2538)的样品中检测到甲型流感病毒,而使用FluPCR试剂盒的B型流感病毒检出率为3.7%(24/649),使用CoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒的检出率为1.7%(43/2538)。然而,在一年中的同一时间段进行评估时,两种试剂盒的检出率具有可比性.使用SARS-CoV-2试剂盒和CoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒,在16.9%(1545/9153)和10.5%(266/2538)的病例中检测到SARS-CoV-2感染,分别。使用Flu/RSV试剂盒在17.7%(66/372)的儿童中鉴定出呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV);由于成年人的参与,当进行针对年龄的RSV测试时,这一数字显着下降。使用CoV-2/流感/RSVplus套件,约34%(35/103)的RSV感染发生在年龄>20岁的患者中;这些病例以前会被忽视,因为成年人没有使用Flu/RSV试剂盒进行RSV常规检测.所有合并感染病例(n=16)仅用CoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒检测到。
    使用XpertXpressCoV-2/Flu/RSVplus试剂盒不仅通过准确检测所有四种病毒而缩短了周转时间,还提供了有关成人RSV感染和合并感染率的信息。
    UNASSIGNED: Viral infection is responsible for the majority of respiratory tract infections (RTI). This retrospective study evaluates the advantages of using the multiplex Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit in laboratory diagnosis of RTI caused by the most related viruses.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were obtained from medical records between November 2021 and May 2023 for any sample tested using either the Xpert Xpress Flu/RSV kit, Xpert Xpress Flu kit, Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 kit, and Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit.
    UNASSIGNED: Influenza virus A was detected in 8.5% (55/649) of the samples using the Flu PCR kit and in 4.9% (123/2538) using CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit, while influenza virus B detection rates were 3.7% (24/649) using the Flu PCR kit and 1.7% (43/2538) using the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit. However, the detection rates using the two kits were comparable when evaluated for the same time period of the year. SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected in 16.9% (1545/9153) and 10.5% (266/2538) of the cases using the SARS-CoV-2 kit and CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kits, respectively. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was identified in 17.7% (66/372) of children using Flu/RSV kit; this number dropped significantly when age-targeted testing of RSV was performed due to involvements of adults. With the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit, about 34% (35/103) of RSV infections detected were in patients aged >20 years; these cases would have previously been overlooked because adults are not routinely tested for RSV using the Flu/RSV kit. All coinfection cases (n = 16) were only detected with the CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit.
    UNASSIGNED: The use of Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus kit not only results in shorter turnaround times through accurate detection of all four viruses, but also provides information on RSV infection in adults and coinfection rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号