暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI.
RESULTS: A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation.
CONCLUSIONS: During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence during the 3-month blanking period after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is typically not considered as a predictor for late recurrence.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the significance of early recurrence as a risk factor for late recurrence in patients with AF receiving pulsed-field ablation (PFA).
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing PFA were prospectively followed up for 1 year. All patients received isolation of pulmonary veins. Additional ablation procedures were performed per operator\'s discretion. After the procedure, all remained on their previously ineffective antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) during the 2-month blanking period after which the AADs were discontinued. Early recurrence was defined as atrial arrhythmia of >30-second duration during the 3-month blanking period, and any recurrence beyond 3 months was considered as late recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 337 patients undergoing PFA for AF were included. Early recurrence was recorded in 53 patients (15.7%): 10 in the first month, 12 in the second month, and 31 in the third month. Of the 10 patients having recurrence during the first month, 7 (70%) remained in sinus rhythm after cardioversion whereas 3 (30%) underwent a redo procedure because of late recurrence. At 1 year, all patients with recurrence in the second and third months experienced late recurrence; among these patients, 10 (83.3%) of 12 and 27 (87%) of 31 underwent a redo procedure and the remaining 6 patients were in sinus rhythm on AADs.
CONCLUSIONS: In this consecutive series of patients with AF, early recurrence in the second or third month after the PFA procedure was associated with a high risk of late recurrence. Thus, blanking period could be redefined as 1 month after PFA.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Superior vena cava (SVC) isolation during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation is limited by the risk of collateral damage to the sinus node and/or the phrenic nerve. Due to its tissue-specificity, we hypothesized the feasibility and safety of pulsed-field ablation (PFA)-based SVC isolation.
RESULTS: One hundred and five consecutive patients undergoing PFA-based AF catheter ablation were prospectively included. After pulmonary vein isolation (±posterior wall isolation and electrical cardioversion), SVC isolation was performed using a standardized workflow. Acute SVC isolation was achieved in 105/105 (100%) patients after 6 ± 1 applications. Transient phrenic nerve stunning occurred in 67/105 (64%) patients but without phrenic nerve palsy at the end of the procedure and at hospital discharge. Transient high-degree sinus node dysfunction occurred in 5/105 (4.7%) patients, with no recurrence at the end of the procedure and until discharge. At the 3-month follow-up visit, no complication occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: SVC isolation using a pentaspline PFA catheter is feasible and safe.

暂无摘要。

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising nonthermal ablation alternative for treating atrial fibrillation (AF). By delivering ultra-rapid high-energy electrical pulses, PFA induces irreversible electroporation, selectively targeting myocardial tissue while sparing adjacent structures from thermal or other damage. This article provides a comprehensive review of multiple pre-clinical studies, clinical studies, and clinical trials evaluating the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of PFA in various settings and patient populations. Overall, the reviewed evidence highlights PFA\'s potential as a revolutionary ablation strategy for AF treatment. Offering comparable procedural efficacy to conventional ablation methods, PFA distinguishes itself with shorter procedure times and reduced risks of complications such as phrenic nerve palsy and potential esophageal injury. While further research is warranted to establish long-term efficacy, PFA\'s distinct advantages and evolving clinical evidence suggest a promising future for this novel nonthermal ablation approach. As PFA continues to advance, it has the potential to transform AF ablation procedures, providing a safer alternative for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging ablative technology that has been used successfully to eliminate cardiac arrhythmias. As a nonthermal technique, it has significant benefits over traditional radiofrequency ablation with improved target tissue specificity and reduced risk of adverse events during cardiac applications. We investigated whether PFA is safe for use in the stomach and whether it could modulate gastric slow waves. Female weaner pigs were fasted overnight before anesthesia was induced using tiletamine hydrochloride (50 mg·mL-1) and zolazepam hydrochloride (50 mg·mL-1) and maintained with propofol (Diprivan 2%, 0.2-0.4 mg·kg-1·min-1). Pulsed-field ablation was performed on their gastric serosa in vivo. Adjacent point lesions (n = 2-4) were used to create a linear injury using bipolar pulsed-field ablation consisting of 40 pulses (10 Hz frequency, 0.1 ms pulse width, 1,000 V amplitude). High-resolution electrical mapping defined baseline and postablation gastric slow-wave patterns. A validated five-point scale was used to evaluate tissue damage in hematoxylin and eosin-stained images. Results indicated that PFA successfully induced complete conduction blocks in all cases, with lesions through the entire thickness of the gastric muscle layers. Consistent postablation slow-wave patterns emerged immediately following ablation and persisted over the study period. Pulsed-field ablation induces rapid conduction blocks as a tool to modulate slow-wave patterns, indicating it may be suitable as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Results show that pulsed-field ablation can serve as a gastric slow-wave intervention by preventing slow-wave propagation across the lesion site. Stable conduction blocks were established immediately following energy delivery, faster than previous examples of radiofrequency gastric ablation. Pulsed-field ablation may be an alternative for gastric slow-wave intervention, and further functional and posthealing studies are now warranted.

UNASSIGNED: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an alternative to thermal ablation (TA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving catheter-based therapy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its efficacy and safety have yet to be fully elucidated.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to compare the acute and long-term efficacies and safety of PFA and TA.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials comparing PFA and TA in patients with AF undergoing their first PVI ablation. The TA group was divided into cryoballoon (CB) and radiofrequency subgroups. AF patients were divided into paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) subgroups for further analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Eighteen studies involving 4998 patients (35.2% PFA) were included. Overall, PFA was associated with a shorter procedure time (mean difference [MD] -21.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] -32.81 to -10.54) but longer fluoroscopy time (MD 4.53; 95% CI 2.18-6.88) than TA. Regarding safety, lower (peri-)esophageal injury rates (odds ratio [OR] 0.17; 95% CI 0.06-0.46) and higher tamponade rates (OR 2.98; 95% CI 1.27-7.00) were observed after PFA. In efficacy assessment, PFA was associated with a better first-pass isolation rate (OR 6.82; 95% CI 1.37-34.01) and a lower treatment failure rate (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.70-0.98). Subgroup analysis showed no differences in PersAF and PAF. CB was related to higher (peri)esophageal injury, and lower PVI acute success and procedural time.
UNASSIGNED: Compared to TA, PFA showed better results with regard to acute and long-term efficacy but significant differences in safety, with lower (peri)esophageal injury rates but higher tamponade rates in procedural data.

暂无摘要。