pulsed dye laser

脉冲染料激光器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血管纤维瘤是结节性硬化症(TS)的常见面部表现。然而,由于高复发率和不依从性,目前的治疗已被证明无效.为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种新的三联激光治疗方案,以更有效地治疗血管纤维瘤.我们进行了测试以验证其功效。这是一项针对10名TS患者的前瞻性研究(4名女性和6名男性,平均年龄26.3岁[15-37岁]),从2000年1月至2022年12月在我们的私人皮肤科诊所接受了三联序贯激光治疗的血管纤维瘤。我们通过临床摄影(0、6个月,1年,和2年),和皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)。所有患者均恢复成功,无任何并发症。在这10名患者中,4人在6个月的随访中经历了局部复发。这些复发用第二次单次二氧化碳激光治疗。经过2年的随访,我们没有观察到反复出现的面部皮肤表现。此外,所有患者治疗后FASI评分均下降.根据视觉模拟量表,患者报告95%的满意度,DLQI表示对他们的日常生活只有很小的影响。我们认为这种三步激光治疗方案是有效的,安全,对于面部血管纤维瘤患者来说,提供令人满意的结果,适应日常皮肤病学和整形外科实践。
    Angiofibromas are a common facial manifestation of tuberous sclerosis (TS). However, current treatments have proven ineffective due to high recurrence rates and noncompliance. To address this issue, we developed a new triple laser therapy protocol for more effective management of angiofibromas. We conducted tests to validate its efficacy. This is a prospective study of 10 patients with TS (4 women and 6 men, mean age 26.3 years [15-37 years]) with angiofibromata who received triple sequential laser therapy at our private dermatological clinic conducted from January 2000 to December 2022. We evaluated the outcome with the Facial Angiofibromata Severity Index (FASI) via clinical photography (0, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). All patients had a successful recovery without any complications. Among these 10 patients, 4 experienced localized recurrences at their 6-month follow-up. These recurrences were treated with a second single carbon dioxide laser session. After 2 years of follow-up, we observed no recurring facial cutaneous manifestations. Furthermore, all patients experienced a decrease in their FASI score after treatment. According to the Visual Analogue Scale, patients reported 95% satisfaction, and DLQI indicated only a minor impact on their everyday lives. We believe that this protocol of three-step laser treatment is effective, safe, and compliable for patients with facial angiofibromata, providing a satisfactory outcome adaptable to the daily dermatological and plastic surgery practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    皮肤化脓性肉芽肿(PGs)很常见,良性血管肿瘤的发病机制不明确;然而,越来越多的文献表明,PGs的形成可能是Ras/Raf/MAPK和PI3K/Akt/mTOR途径遗传改变的次要因素。我们介绍了三例首次出现在婴儿期的自发性多焦PG,与其他血管异常或可辨别的病因无关,在Ras/Raf/MAPK途径中包含体细胞遗传变异(NRASn=2,FGFR1n=1),用β受体阻滞剂和mTOR抑制剂治疗难以治疗,对脉冲染料激光反应最好。我们提出术语“自发多焦PG”来描述这个实体。
    Cutaneous pyogenic granulomas (PGs) are common, benign vascular tumors of uncertain pathogenesis; however, a growing body of literature suggests that the formation of PGs may be secondary to genetic alterations in both the Ras/Raf/MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways. We present three cases of spontaneous multifocal PGs that first presented in infancy, were not associated with other vascular anomalies or discernable etiology, harbored somatic genetic variants in the Ras/Raf/MAPK pathway (NRAS n = 2, FGFR1 n = 1), were refractory to treatment with beta-blockers and mTOR inhibitors, and responded best to pulsed dye laser. We propose the term \"spontaneous multifocal PGs\" to describe this entity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统评价评估了有关激光治疗指甲牛皮癣(NP)的证据,皮肤牛皮癣患者中普遍存在的一种情况,特别影响他们的生活质量。传统的治疗方法在药物输送和患者依从性方面存在局限性,导致对激光治疗的兴趣,延长治疗间隔,以及增强局部用药有效性的潜力。MEDLINE,Embase,WebofScience,搜索了Cochrane图书馆数据库。包括具有全文可用性的英语随机和非随机对照试验。激光类型的数据,治疗方案,指甲牛皮癣严重程度指数(NAPSI)结果,并提取了不良事件,并评估甲床和基质特征以及患者满意度。主要效果测量是NAPSI评分从基线降低的百分比。涉及脉冲染料激光器(PDL)的19项研究,确定了长脉冲钕:钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光和分数二氧化碳激光(FCL)。激光,特别是那些与外用药物结合使用的药物,已经显示出良好的结果。PDL有效降低了NAPSI分数,Nd:YAG激光的疗效相当,但不适更多。FCL也显示出希望,特别是局部给药。PDL和Nd:YAG激光治疗在减少甲床特征方面更有效,而FCL在减少甲床和基质特征方面是有效的。总的来说,激光是NP的有希望的治疗替代方案,与局部治疗和病灶内注射相似的NAPSI结果。
    This systematic review assesses the evidence concerning laser treatments for nail psoriasis (NP), a prevalent condition among individuals with cutaneous psoriasis that notably affects their quality of life. Traditional treatments have limitations in terms of drug delivery and poor patient adherence, leading to interest in laser therapies for their targeted approach, extended treatment intervals, and the potential to enhance topical medication effectiveness. The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. English-language randomized and non-randomized controlled trials with full-text availability were included. Data on the laser type, treatment protocol, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) outcomes, and adverse events were extracted, and nail bed and matrix features and patient satisfaction were assessed. The primary effect measure was a percentage reduction in NAPSI scores from baseline. Nineteen studies involving the pulse dye laser (PDL), long-pulsed neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser and fractional carbon dioxide laser (FCL) were identified. Lasers, particularly those used in conjunction with topical agents, have shown favorable results. PDL effectively lowered NAPSI scores, and the Nd:YAG laser had comparable effectiveness but more discomfort. FCL also shows promise, particularly for topical drug delivery. PDL and Nd:YAG laser treatment were more effective at reducing nail bed features, whereas FCL was effective at reducing both nail bed and matrix features. Overall, lasers are promising treatment alternatives for NP, with similar NAPSI outcomes to topical therapies and intralesional injections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的临床研究表明,脉冲染料激光(PDL)和强脉冲光(IPL)可有效治疗红斑变性酒渣鼻(ETR)。本文旨在比较PDL和IPL在三个不同波段(宽带,单窄带,和双窄带)治疗ETR。将60名患有ETR的受试者随机分为四组,并接受以下激光治疗之一:PDL(595nm),带精致脉冲光的IPL(DPL,500-600nm),IPL与M22590(590-1200nm),或IPL与M22血管过滤器(530-650nm和900-1200nm)。以4周的间隔进行四次治疗,在最后一次治疗后4周进行一次随访。通过比较临床症状评分评价四种激光的疗效,总有效率,VISIA红色区域绝对得分,治疗前后RosaQoL评分。通过比较疼痛等不良反应来评估安全性,紫癜,红斑性水肿,和水泡。所有60名受试者完成了研究。组内效应显示,临床症状评分,VISIA红色区域绝对得分,与治疗前相比,所有四组的RosaQoL评分均显着降低(p<0.001)。4组激光组间差异无统计学意义。安全性分析显示,所有四个激光器都是安全的,但M22血管组的水疱发生率较高。非尿毒症PDL,DPL,M22590和M22血管在治疗ETR方面同样有效,并且耐受性良好。ClinicalTrial.gov标识符:NCT05360251。
    Previous clinical studies have shown that pulsed dye laser (PDL) and intense pulsed light (IPL) are effective for treating erythematotelangiectatic rosacea(ETR). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PDL and IPL at three different wavelength bands (broad-band, single-narrow-band, and dual-narrow-band) in treating ETR. Sixty subjects with ETR were randomly categorized into four groups and received one of the following laser treatments: PDL (595 nm), IPL with Delicate Pulse Light (DPL, 500-600 nm), IPL with M22 590 (590-1200 nm), or IPL with M22 vascular filter (530-650 nm and 900-1200 nm). Four treatment sessions were administered at 4-week intervals, with one follow-up session 4 weeks after the final treatment. The efficacy of the four lasers was evaluated by comparing the clinical symptom score, total effective rate, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score before and after treatment. The safety was evaluated by comparing adverse reactions such as pain, purpura, erythematous edema, and blister. All 60 subjects completed the study. Within-group effects showed that the clinical symptom score, VISIA red area absolute score, and RosaQoL score of all four groups were significantly reduced compared to before treatment (p < 0.001). Between-group effects showed no statistically significant difference among the four laser groups. Safety analysis showed that all four lasers were safe, but the incidence of blister was higher in the M22 vascular group. Nonpurpurogenic PDL, DPL, M22 590, and M22 vascular were equally effective in treating ETR and were well-tolerated. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT05360251.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    皮肤胶原性血管病变(CCV)是一种罕见的特发性真皮微血管病变。临床上,它表现为弥漫性皮肤毛细血管扩张,与其他良性血管实体难以区分,从而提出了诊断挑战。我们介绍了用脉冲染料激光(PDL)成功治疗的CCV病例。一名27岁男性出现全身性红斑,通过组织病理学诊断为CCV。在一个成功的测试点之后,PDL治疗导致显著的改善。CCV的发病机理涉及皮肤微血管改变和面纱细胞活化。流行病学,它主要影响高加索人,最常见的是中年人。相似病变的阴性家族史可以帮助缩小鉴别诊断范围。诊断需要活检,组织病理学检查显示血管扩张和胶原血管壁增厚。鉴于其稀有性,CCV提出了诊断和管理挑战,尽管PDL作为一种有希望的治疗方式出现了这种情况。
    Cutaneous collagenous vasculopathy (CCV) is a rare idiopathic dermal microangiopathy. Clinically, it presents as diffuse cutaneous telangiectasias that are indistinguishable from other benign vascular entities, thereby posing a diagnostic challenge. We present a case of CCV successfully treated with pulsed dye laser (PDL). A 27-year-old male presented with generalized erythematous macules, diagnosed as CCV via histopathology. After a successful test spot, PDL treatment resulted in significant improvement. The pathogenesis of CCV involves altered dermal microvasculature and veil cell activation. Epidemiologically, it primarily affects Caucasians, most often in the middle-aged adult population. A negative family history of similar lesions can help narrow down the differential diagnosis. Diagnosis requires biopsy, with histopathological examination demonstrating vessel ectasia and collagenous vessel wall thickening. Given its rarity, CCV presents diagnostic and management challenges though PDL emerges as a promising treatment modality for this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知用脉冲染料激光对手术疤痕进行早期干预可有效预防病理性疤痕。尽管有多次关于治疗效果的报道,很少有研究证明其适当的启动时机。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定甲状腺切除术后开始激光治疗的最佳时机.
    本研究回顾性分析了91例甲状腺切除术后接受脉冲染料激光治疗的患者,按治疗开始时间分组。患者以3-4周的间隔接受至少5次治疗。那些具有高柔韧性评分的患者被注射病灶内皮质类固醇。使用Antera3D®皮肤成像分析仪评估生物物理参数。
    所有组治疗后温哥华疤痕量表总评分均显着降低。在手术后3周内开始治疗的组中,温哥华疤痕量表评分降低率明显更高。通过Antera3D®分析的色素沉着和红斑评分在该组中也较低。
    在甲状腺切除术的3周内使用脉冲染料激光进行早期干预可以大大抑制病理性瘢痕的发展,为医生提供最佳治疗开始的指南。
    UNASSIGNED: Early intervention of surgical scars with a pulsed dye laser is known to effectively prevent pathologic scars. Despite multiple reports on the effectiveness of the treatment, very few studies have demonstrated its appropriate initiation timing. In this study, our objective was to determine the optimal timing for initiating laser treatment following thyroidectomy.
    UNASSIGNED: This study retrospectively analyzed 91 patients undergoing pulsed dye laser treatment post-thyroidectomy, grouping them by treatment initiation timing. The patients underwent treatment at intervals of 3-4 weeks with at least five sessions. Those with a high pliability score were injected with intralesional corticosteroids. The Antera 3D® skin imaging analyzer was used to assess biophysical parameters.
    UNASSIGNED: The total Vancouver Scar Scale score significantly reduced after treatment in all groups. The Vancouver Scar Scale score reduction rate was significantly higher after treatment in the group for which the treatment was initiated within 3 weeks of surgery. The pigmentation and erythema score analyzed by Antera 3D® was also lower in this group.
    UNASSIGNED: Early intervention using a pulsed dye laser within 3 weeks of thyroidectomy can substantially inhibit pathological scar development, providing physicians with a guide for optimal treatment commencement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:薄皮肤非黑色素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)的主要治疗方法仍然是手术,但是,由于皮肤脆弱和皮肤萎缩,老年手的手术可能会变得复杂。无需冷却即可使用,595nm(nm)脉冲染料激光(PDL)具有通过非特异性热坏死破坏NMSC的能力。这项研究的目的是了解使用595nmPDL进行一次或两次治疗后,老年患者背侧NMSC的复发。
    方法:回顾性分析发现147例NMSC位于背侧手,用595nmPDL治疗。包括基底细胞癌(BCC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的病例。所有患者接受1至2次PDL治疗。主要结果是癌症的复发。
    结果:在接受PDL治疗的NMSC病例中,12例患者复发(8.2%).研究期间无BCC病例复发。原位SCC复发率为4.7%,侵袭性SCC复发率为10.4%(p=0.34)。在接受过一次治疗的71例患者中,复发10例(14.1%),在76例接受两次治疗的病例中,2例患者复发(2.6%,p=0.01)。
    结论:两种PDL治疗老年患者背手NMSC的耐受性良好,复发率低,似乎比一种治疗更有效。
    OBJECTIVE: The mainstay of treatment for nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) on thin skin remains surgical, but procedures on older hands may be complicated by skin fragility and dermal atrophy. Used without cooling, 595 nm (nm) pulsed dye laser (PDL) has the capability of destroying NMSC through nonspecific thermal necrosis. The purpose of this study was to understand recurrence of NMSC on dorsal hands of older patients after one or two treatments using 595 nm PDL.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 147 cases of NMSC located on the dorsal hands treated with 595 nm PDL. Cases of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) were included. All patients received one to two treatments with PDL. The primary outcome was the recurrence of carcinoma.
    RESULTS: Among NMSC cases treated with PDL, recurrence occurred in 12 patients (8.2%). No cases of BCC recurred during the study period. Recurrence of SCC was 4.7% for SCC in situ and 10.4% recurrence for invasive SCC (p = 0.34). Among 71 patients treated once, recurrence occurred in 10 patients (14.1%), and among 76 cases treated twice, recurrence occurred in 2 patients (2.6%, p = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: Two treatments of PDL for NMSC on the dorsal hands of older patients was well tolerated, had low recurrence, and seemed more effective than one treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    背景:脉冲染料激光(PDL)是酒渣鼻的标准疗法之一,但是需要其他选择。
    目的:为了比较可变序列的疗效和安全性,大光斑532nmKTP激光对595nmPDL治疗酒渣鼻。
    方法:前瞻性,控制,评估者盲法研究。患者以6-8周的间隔用KTP或PDL治疗1-3次。在治疗后第6周安排随访。通过计算机辅助分析以及患者和两名失明的皮肤科医生评估临床结果。记录治疗期间的疼痛强度和不良事件。
    结果:45名患者(平均年龄51岁)以2:1的比例分配给KTP或PDL。两个治疗组中的红斑显著降低(p<0.01)。临床评估显示有很大改善。KTP(2.5/10)的平均疼痛强度明显低于PDL(4.1/10)。两种激光器均显示出良好的安全性。仅在PDL组见相关紫癜。
    结论:两个变量排序,大斑点KTP和PDL在治疗酒渣鼻方面表现出相当的疗效。关于安全,KTP显示治疗后反应较少。在酒渣鼻的治疗中,KTP可能是PDL的潜在替代品。
    BACKGROUND: Pulsed-dye lasers (PDL) are one of the standard therapies for rosacea, but alternatives are needed.
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the variable-sequenced, large-spot 532 nm KTP laser to the 595 nm PDL in treating rosacea.
    METHODS: A prospective, controlled, evaluator-blinded study. Patients were treated with either a KTP or PDL with 1-3 sessions at intervals of 6-8 weeks. A follow-up visit was scheduled on Week 6 post-treatment. Clinical outcome was assessed by computer-assisted analysis and by patients and two blinded dermatologists. Pain intensity during treatment and adverse events were documented.
    RESULTS: Forty-five patients (mean age 51 years) were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to either the KTP or PDL. Erythema in both treatment arms decreased significantly (p < 0.01). Clinical evaluation revealed high improvement. Mean pain intensity was significantly lower with the KTP (2.5/10) than with the PDL (4.1/10). Both lasers showed a good safety profile. Relevant purpura was only seen in the PDL group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both the variable-sequenced, large-spot KTP and the PDL demonstrated comparable efficacy in treatment of rosacea. Regarding safety, the KTP exhibited fewer post-treatment reactions. The KTP might serve as a potential alternative to PDL in the treatment of rosacea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:葡萄酒胎记(PWB)是皮肤的先天性血管畸形。脉冲染料激光(PDL)是全球PWB治疗的“金标准”。血卟啉单甲醚(HMME或血泊芬)介导的光动力疗法(HMME-PDT)已成为PWB治疗的首选,特别是对于年幼的孩子,在过去的几十年里,中国的许多大医院。
    目的:通过比较两种模式的临床疗效,评估HMME-PDT是否优于PDL。
    方法:检索PubMed记录,查找使用PDL(1988-2023)或HMME-PDT(2007-2023)进行PWB治疗的所有相关研究。提取患者特征和临床疗效。包括具有四分位数百分比清除率或类似量表的研究。计算每个研究的平均颜色清除指数(CI),并在组间进行比较。总CI(C0),数据按队列大小加权,用于评估每种模式的最终疗效。
    结果:共有18项HMME-PDT研究纳入了中国的3910例患者。同样,来自9个不同国家的5094名患者的40项PDL研究符合纳入本分析的条件。在HMME-PDT研究中,超过58%的患者是未成年人(<18岁)。很大一部分(21.3%)是幼儿(<3岁)。同样,PDL研究中33.2%的患者为未成年人。一小部分(9.3%)是幼儿。PDL的总体清除率略有下降,但并不重要,在所有年龄段的患者中,HMME-PDT高于HMME-PDT(C0,0.54vs.0.48,p=0.733),只有未成年人的亚群(C0,0.54vs.0.46,p=0.714),和年幼的孩子(C0,0.67vs.0.50,p=0.081)。遗憾的是,缺乏关于HMME-PDT对幼儿的疗效和影响的随访评估的长期数据,特别是中枢神经系统发育,因为与成年人相比,他们的血脑屏障具有更大的渗透性。
    结论:PDL显示,在所有年龄段的患者中,总体清除率明显高于HMME-PDT;在幼儿中几乎达到了统计学意义。总的来说,目前的证据不足以支持HMME-PDT作为幼儿PWBs的首选治疗方案:(1)与PDL相比总体疗效较差;(2)手术期间脱靶暴露于脑膜脉管系统的风险;(3)给予药物缓解副作用;(4)缺乏关于HMME对幼儿中枢神经系统发育潜在影响的长期数据.
    Port wine birthmark (PWB) is a congenital vascular malformation of the skin. Pulsed dye laser (PDL) is the \"gold standard\" for the treatment of PWB globally. Hematoporphyrin monomethyl ether (HMME or hemoporfin)-mediated photodynamic therapy (HMME-PDT) has emerged as the first choice for PWB treatment, particularly for young children, in many major hospitals in China during the past several decades.
    To evaluate whether HMME-PDT is superior to PDL by comparing the clinical efficacies of both modalities.
    PubMed records were searched for all relevant studies of PWB treatment using PDL (1988-2023) or HMME-PDT (2007-2023). Patient characteristics and clinical efficacies were extracted. Studies with a quartile percentage clearance or similar scale were included. A mean color clearance index (CI) per study was calculated and compared among groups. An overall CI (C0), with data weighted by cohort size, was used to evaluate the final efficacy for each modality.
    A total of 18 HMME-PDT studies with 3910 patients in China were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Similarly, 40 PDL studies with 5094 patients from nine different countries were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Over 58% of patients in the HMME-PDT studies were minors (<18 years old). A significant portion (21.3%) were young children (<3 years old). Similarly, 33.2% of patients in the PDL studies were minors. A small proportion (9.3%) was young children. The overall clearance rates for PDL were slightly, but not significantly, higher than those for HMME-PDT in cohorts with patients of all ages (C0, 0.54 vs. 0.48, p = 0.733), subpopulations with only minors (C0, 0.54 vs. 0.46, p = 0.714), and young children (C0, 0.67 vs. 0.50, p = 0.081). Regrettably, there was a lack of long-term data on follow-up evaluations for efficacy and impact of HMME-PDT on young children in general, and central nervous system development in particular, because their blood-brain barriers have a greater permeability as compared to adults.
    PDL shows overall albeit insignificantly higher clearance rates than HMME-PDT in patients of all ages; particularly statistical significance is nearly achieved in young children. Collectively, current evidence is insufficient to support HMME-PDT as the first choice of treatment of PWBs in young children given: (1) overall inferior efficacy as compared to PDL; (2) risk of off-target exposure to meningeal vasculature during the procedure; (3) administration of steriods for mitigation of side effects; -and (4) lack of long-term data on the potential impact of HMME on central nervous system development in young children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号