OBJECTIVE: POEM is a mature procedure endorsed by societal guidelines as a first line therapy for achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders. Nonetheless, several questions remain, including expanding indications for POEM, periprocedural evaluation and management, and the optimal POEM technique to enhance clinical success while mitigating risk for reflux.
RESULTS: There is uncertainty regarding several technical aspects of the POEM myotomy; though aggregating evidence supports the use of real-time impedance planimetry to guide the myotomy. While post-POEM reflux remains a concerning long term sequela, there is an increasing focus on the potential role of endoscopic anti-reflux interventions. Lastly, with the widespread adoption of POEM, we continue to witness ongoing efforts to standardize post-procedural care and training in this procedure. POEM is no longer a novel but rather established procedure. Yet, this technique has continued to evolve, with the aim of optimizing treatment success while reducing adverse events and risk for post-procedural reflux.

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a standard procedure for achalasia, an esophageal motility disorder, characterized by a thickened lower esophageal sphincter muscularis propria (LEMP). Visualization of this anatomical stratification has been made possible by the advent of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). However, the effect of LEMP thickness on treatment outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate whether LEMP thickness affects treatment response post-POEM.
METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of patients who underwent POEM between 2014 and 2021. Patients who underwent EUS to evaluate the LEMP before POEM were included in the study. We divided the patients into two groups according to muscle thickness measured by EUS (≥ 2.80 mm; group 1, < 2.80 mm; group 2). The pre- and post-procedural clinical parameters were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Among 278 patients, 189 were enrolled. There were no significant differences in the pre- and post-Eckardt scores, integrated relaxation pressure, and distensibility index between the two groups divided by muscle thickness. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in symptom recurrence, as measured by an Eckardt score > 3, post-procedural complications, or post-POEM GERD symptoms. However, patients with thicker lower esophageal sphincter muscle showed a greater decrease in Eckardt scores (ΔES ≥ 3) which was statistically significant (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: POEM is an effective and safe treatment method for achalasia, regardless of LES muscle thickness. There was a statistically significant difference in the decrease of Eckardt scores of 3 or greater (ΔES ≥ 3) after POEM in the thicker LEMP group suggesting greater alleviation of symptoms in POEM patients with thicker lower esophageal muscle.

BACKGROUND: The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata.
RESULTS: There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has proven to be a successful treatment method for achalasia in both adult and pediatric patients. Yet, there is a lack of evidence for anaesthetic management of pediatric patients who underwent POEM procedure. In this study, we aim to present perioperative and postoperative management strategies for pediatric patients with achalasia from in anaesthesia aspect.
Medical records were reviewed for 16 pediatric patients at a single center who underwent POEM procedure for achalasia between 2017 and 2020. Patients\' data regarding demographics, preoperative diet, body mass index, perioperative monitoring and vitals, airway management, anaesthesia maintenance, mechanical ventilation settings duration of recovery, length of stay, pain management and adverse events were evaluated.
The study cohort included 7 female and 9 male patients with a mean age of 5.5 years. Anaesthesia maintenance was provided with 0.8-1.2 minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane in a 40-60% O2-air mixture, Remifentanil infusion and bolus doses of Rocuronium. The median age was 3 years for patients ventilated in pressure controlled ventilation mode and 10 years in volume controlled ventilation mode. Respiration rate and minute ventilation were adjusted to maintain end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) below 45 mmHg. Needle decompression was applied for 14 patients (87.5%) for treatment of capnoperitoneum. The mean procedure duration and recovery room duration were 66 (±22.9) minutes and 62 (±21) minutes, respectively. Postoperative pain management is provided with paracetamol and tramadol in total 8 patients (50%). There was no adverse event during postoperative period and all patients discharged in a mean time of 3 days.
POEM has demonstrated encouraging outcomes in terms of safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients. Due to challenging nature of the pediatric patients, it is important to acknowledge that the procedure requires specialized anaesthesia management. Management of perioperative complications of increased ETCO2 requires understanding the physiologic results of pneumo-mediastinum and pneumo-peritoneum. Beside the known anaesthetic management strategies, a tailored approach should be adopted for each patient. Further investigations should be conducted to develop standardized management.

UNASSIGNED: Achalasia can cause disabling symptoms that may substantially impair the quality of life. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising results in the management of achalasia. In this meta-analysis we have evaluated the feasibility and safety of single-session POEM with fundoplication (POEM+F) in patients with achalasia.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed several databases from inception to July 08, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and/or safety of single-session POEM+F for patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest included the technical success of POEM+F, adverse events, esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy, total procedure time, and fundoplication time. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic.
UNASSIGNED: We included 4 studies with 90 patients. Pooled rates (95%CI) of technical success and adverse events were 92% (83-96%) and 5% (2-11%), respectively. Pooled rates (95%CI) of esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy were 18% (11-30%) and 85% (43-98%) respectively. Pooled mean procedure time and fundoplication time were 113.2 (98.7-127.6) and 55.3 (43.7-66.8) min, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of POEM+F in patients with achalasia. More studies with long-term follow up are required to further validate these findings.

This editorial is an analysis the review article by Nabi et al recently published in this journal. Achalasia Cardia is a disease whose pathophysiology is still unclear. It is known that there is inflammation of unknown aetiology leading to loss of ganglion cells in the muscularis propria. The end result is lower oesophageal sphincter spasm, loss of receptive relaxation, decreased oesophageal peristalsis, all leading on to varying degrees of dysphagia. The treatment of this condition is palliative in nature, performed by myotomy of the lower oesophagus either surgically or endoscopically. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been associated with the myotomy performed, particularly with the Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) procedure. Nabi et al have provided an excellent overview of the latest developments in predicting, preventing, evaluating, and managing GERD subsequent to POEM. Based on this theme, this review article explores the concept of using histology of the oesophageal muscle layer, to grade the disease and thereby help tailoring the length/type of myotomy performed during the POEM procedure. In the future, will a histology based algorithm available preoperatively, help modify the POEM procedure, thereby decreasing the incidence of GERD associated with POEM?

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: To explore the feasibility of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 2136 patients with achalasia between January 2016 and December 2022. Patients with achalasia and hiatal hernia were assigned into study group, and matched patients with achalasia but no hiatal hernia were assigned into control group. The preoperative baseline information, procedure-related adverse events (AEs) and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Hiatal hernia was identified in 56/1564 (3.6%) patients with achalasia. All of these patients underwent POEM with success. The preoperative baseline characteristics were similar between the study and control group. The study group presented with a similar rate of mucosal injury (12.5% vs 16.1, P = 0.589), pneumothorax (3.6% vs 1.8%, P = 1.000), pleural effusion (8.9% vs 12.5%, P = 0.541) and major AEs (1.8% vs 1.8%, P = 1.000) compared with the control group. As for the follow-up data, no significant differences were observed in clinical success (96.4% vs 92.9%, P = 0.679; 93.6% vs 94.0%, P = 1.000; 86.5% vs 91.4%, P = 0.711) clinical reflux (25.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.496; 31.9% vs 26.0%, P = 0.521; 35.1% vs 31.4%, P = 0.739) and proton pump inhibitor usage (17.9% vs 16.1%, P = 0.801; 29.8% vs 24.0%, P = 0.520; 32.4% vs 25.7%, P = 0.531) between the study group and control group at 1-year, 2-year and 3-year follow-ups.
CONCLUSIONS: POEM is a safe and effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia.

The peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) procedure has revolutionized the management of achalasia in many centres around the world as it offers patients a minimally invasive endoscopic solution to their dysphagia caused by achalasia. Alongside its success in alleviating dysphagia, concerns regarding postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease have emerged as a pertinent issue which are not fully resolved. In this study, Nabi et al have comprehensively reviewed the topic of the prediction, prevention and management of gastroesophageal reflux after POEM. POEM is a purely endoscopic procedure which is usually performed without any anti-reflux procedure. Certain patients may be better served by a laparoscopic Heller\'s myotomy and fundoplication and it is important that gastroenterologists and surgeons provide comprehensive risks and benefits of each achalasia treatment option so that patients can decide what treatment is best for them. This article by Nabi et al provides a comprehensive review of the current status of this issue to allow these discussions to occur.

UNASSIGNED: Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disease, for which peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a promising treatment option; however, recurrence remains a challenge. Timed barium esophagography (TBE) is a useful diagnostic tool and potential outcome predictor of achalasia. This study aimed to determine predictive tools for recurrence after POEM.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study enrolled achalasia patients who underwent POEM between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were categorized into two groups using the 1-month post-POEM Eckardt scores and TBE: the discordant group (Eckardt score improved >50%, TBE decreased <50%) and the concordant group (both Eckardt score and TBE improved >50%). Recurrence was defined as a reincrease in the Eckardt score to more than three during follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Complete medical records were available in 30 patients who underwent POEM. Seventeen patients (56.7%) were classified into the discordant group, while 13 patients (43.3%) were in the concordant group. The overall recurrence rate was 11.9% at 1-year, increasing to 23.8% during the extended follow-up. The discordant group had a 6.87 fold higher recurrence rate than the concordant group (52.9% vs. 7.7%, p=0.017).
UNASSIGNED: These results strongly suggest that combining the Eckardt score with TBE can effectively predict recurrent achalasia after POEM. Patients in the discordant group had an elevated risk.