nasal allergen challenge

鼻过敏原挑战
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    柏树是地中海地区的一种树。我们的目的是调查对阿拉伯柏树花粉致敏/过敏的频率,这不是安纳托利亚的本地人。
    在Türkiye最大的转诊中心接受呼吸道过敏筛查的5-18岁患者在1年的时间内进行了回顾性分析,以进行一项柏氏变态反应的诊断研究。
    在246名患者中,207(67.6%的男性),中位年龄为11.7(IQR9.2-15)岁,对空气过敏原敏感,而C.arizonica(32%)是仅次于草花粉(83.6%)的第二大最常见的敏感性。在阿拉伯念珠菌敏感亚组中,只有3%(2/67)是单敏感的,和草(77.6%),猫(38.8%),和杂草(38.8%)是最常见的共敏感性。在26例具有C.arizonica敏感性的患者中测量了Cupa1特异性IgE(sIgE),所有患者均为阳性。对67例具有阿拉伯念珠菌敏感性的患者中的44例进行了鼻过敏原攻击(NAC),44例患者中的13例患者在最高的两种提取物浓度下具有阳性结果(NAC+)。NAC+亚组的Cupressus囊大小和Cupa1sIgE水平高于NAC-亚组,但仅在囊大小[6(5-7.5)与4.5(4-6)、p=0.004]。NAC+亚组报告更频繁的流鼻涕,拥塞,在相关的花粉季节,眼睛症状比NAC-亚组。
    C.东地中海地区对亚利桑那州的敏感性有所提高,类似于北地中海的数据,这与临床和实验室发现的过敏有关。加拿大应包括在东地中海儿童的空气过敏原筛查小组中。
    UNASSIGNED: Cupressus sempervirens is a tree native to the Mediterranean region. We aimed to investigate the frequency of sensitization/allergy to Cupressus arizonica pollen, which is not native to Anatolia.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients aged 5-18 years who underwent respiratory allergy screening in Türkiye\'s largest referral center over a 1-year period were reviewed retrospectively for a diagnostic study of Cupressus allergy.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 246 patients, 207 (67.6% male) with a median age of 11.7 (IQR 9.2-15) years were found to be aeroallergen-sensitive and C. arizonica (32%) was the second most common sensitivity after grass pollen (83.6%). In the C. arizonica-sensitive subgroup, only 3% (2/67) were monosensitive, and grass (77.6%), cat (38.8%), and weeds (38.8%) were the most common co-sensitivities. Cup a 1 specific IgE (sIgE) was measured in 26 patients with C. arizonica sensitivity and all were found to be positive. A nasal allergen challenge (NAC) was performed for 44 of 67 patients with C. arizonica sensitivity, and 13 of 44 patients had a positive outcome (NAC+) at the highest two extract concentrations. The Cupressus wheal sizes and Cup a 1 sIgE levels of the NAC+ subgroup were higher than those of the NAC- subgroup but reached significance only for wheal size [6 (5-7.5) vs. 4.5 (4-6), p=0.004]. The NAC+ subgroup reported more frequent nasal discharge, congestion, and eye symptoms than the NAC- subgroup during the relevant pollen season.
    UNASSIGNED: C. arizonica sensitivity has increased in the East Mediterranean region, similarly to North Mediterranean data, and this is associated with the presence of allergy both clinically and in laboratory findings. C. arizonica should be included in the aeroallergen screening panels of children from the East Mediterranean.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鼻过敏原激发(NAC)用于研究过敏原暴露的影响并评估过敏性鼻炎(AR)的治疗效果。这项研究旨在使用许可的白桦树(SB)花粉和屋尘螨(HDM)舌下片作为AR参与者的过敏原提取物来源,建立对NAC的剂量反应。
    方法:16名患有HDM诱导的多年性AR的志愿者和15名患有SB花粉诱导的季节性鼻炎的志愿者接受了由HDM过敏原(Acarizax®)和SB(Itulazax®)片剂提取物的分级剂量增加NAC,分别。鼻部症状总评分(TNSS,范围0-12)和峰值鼻吸气流量(PNIF)记录之前,在10分钟和NAC结束时。确定了在大多数过敏参与者中引起至少7的TNSS的每种过敏原的剂量(“引起剂量7”)。使用“激发剂量7”对5名非过敏个体进行NAC,以测试刺激作用。HDM提取物的“激发剂量7”用于两个SB过敏的亚组,非HDM过敏,志愿者,对于SB提取物,反之亦然,测试反应的过敏原特异性。
    结果:对于SB花粉和HDM,大多数患者在1500AU/mL的中值浓度下经历了至少7/12的TNSS。在此剂量下PNIF的平均下降对于SB为63.15%,对于HDM为63.99%。使用1500AU/mL浓度的NAC对5个没有症状或PNIF反应的非过敏性个体进行。1500AU/mL的HDM提取物在SB过敏原中没有产生症状,在HDM过敏原中也没有1500AU/mL的SB提取物。
    结论:对于SB和HDM提取物,NAC引起中度反应的最佳过敏原剂量(“激发剂量7/12”)为1500AU/mL.许可的舌下过敏原片剂提供了易于获得且廉价的SB和HDM提取物来源,可用于AR的未来介入研究。
    BACKGROUND: Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is used to investigate the effects of allergen exposure and assess treatment efficacy in allergic rhinitis (AR). This study aims to establish dose-responses to NAC using licensed silver birch (SB) pollen and house dust mite (HDM) sublingual tablets as sources of the allergen extracts in participants with AR.
    METHODS: Sixteen volunteers with HDM-induced perennial AR and 15 volunteers with SB pollen-induced seasonal rhinitis underwent a graded up-dosing NAC with extracts derived from HDM allergen (Acarizax®) and SB (Itulazax®) tablets, respectively. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS, range 0-12) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were recorded before, at 10 min and at the end of the NAC. The dose of each allergen that provoked a TNSS of at least 7 (\"provoking dose 7\") in most allergic participants was identified. NACs using the \"provoking dose 7\" were performed on 5 non-allergic individuals to test for irritant effects. The \"provoking dose 7\" of HDM extract was used in a subgroup of two SB allergic, non-HDM allergic, volunteers, and vice versa for SB extract, to test for allergen specificity of the responses.
    RESULTS: Most patients experienced a TNSS of at least 7/12 at a median concentration of 1500 AU/mL for both SB pollen and HDM. The average decline in PNIF at this dose was 63.15% for SB and 63.99% for HDM. NACs using the 1500 AU/mL concentrations were performed on 5 non-allergic individuals with no symptomatic or PNIF response. 1500 AU/mL of HDM extract produced no symptoms in SB allergics nor 1500 AU/mL SB extract in HDM allergics.
    CONCLUSIONS: For both SB and HDM extracts, the optimal allergen dose for NAC to cause a moderate-severity response (\"provoking dose 7/12\") was 1500 AU/mL. Licensed sublingual allergen tablets provide a readily available and inexpensive source of SB and HDM extracts for use in future interventional studies in AR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:蟑螂过敏导致城市儿童哮喘发病。在这些高危儿童中,很少有试验涉及使用蟑螂过敏原进行皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)的效果。
    目的:确定SCIT一年后对蟑螂过敏原的鼻过敏原攻击(NAC)反应是否会改善。
    方法:城市哮喘儿童,蟑螂对NAC敏感和反应,参加了一项为期一年的使用德国蟑螂提取物的随机双盲安慰剂对照SCIT试验.主要终点是SCIT治疗12个月后NAC期间平均总鼻症状评分(TNSS)的变化。NAC期间鼻转录组反应的变化,皮肤点刺试验(SPT)风团大小,评估了血清过敏原特异性抗体产生和对蟑螂过敏原的T细胞反应.
    结果:SCIT分配(n=28)与安慰剂分配(n=29)的参与者之间平均NACTNSS的变化没有差异(p=0.63)。与TNSS相关的鼻转录组反应,但未观察到治疗效果。两组蟑螂血清特异性IgE(sIgE)下降程度相似,而SCIT参与者中减少的蟑螂SPT风团大小更大(p=0.04)。在接受SCIT的受试者中观察到蟑螂sIgG4增加200倍(p<0.001),但在安慰剂组中没有变化。与安慰剂相比,SCIT中蟑螂过敏原刺激后的T细胞白介素-4反应下降幅度更大(p=0.002),而白细胞介素-10或干扰素-γ没有观察到效果。
    结论:SCIT的一年未能改变NACTNSS和鼻转录组对蟑螂过敏原攻击的反应,尽管对过敏原特异性皮肤试验有系统影响,诱导血清sIgG4产生和下调过敏原刺激的T细胞应答。
    BACKGROUND: Cockroach allergy contributes to morbidity among urban children with asthma. Few trials address the effect of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with cockroach allergen among these at-risk children.
    OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether nasal allergen challenge (NAC) responses to cockroach allergen would improve following 1 year of SCIT.
    METHODS: Urban children with asthma, who were cockroach-sensitized and reactive on NAC, participated in a year-long randomized double-blind placebo-controlled SCIT trial using German cockroach extract. The primary endpoint was the change in mean Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) during NAC after 12 months of SCIT. Changes in nasal transcriptomic responses during NAC, skin prick test wheal size, serum allergen-specific antibody production, and T-cell responses to cockroach allergen were assessed.
    RESULTS: Changes in mean NAC TNSS did not differ between SCIT-assigned (n = 28) versus placebo-assigned (n = 29) participants (P = .63). Nasal transcriptomic responses correlated with TNSS, but a treatment effect was not observed. Cockroach serum-specific IgE decreased to a similar extent in both groups, while decreased cockroach skin prick test wheal size was greater among SCIT participants (P = .04). A 200-fold increase in cockroach serum-specific IgG4 was observed among subjects receiving SCIT (P < .001) but was unchanged in the placebo group. T-cell IL-4 responses following cockroach allergen stimulation decreased to a greater extent among SCIT versus placebo (P = .002), while no effect was observed for IL-10 or IFN-γ.
    CONCLUSIONS: A year of SCIT failed to alter NAC TNSS and nasal transcriptome responses to cockroach allergen challenge despite systemic effects on allergen-specific skin tests, induction of serum-specific IgG4 serum production and down-modulation of allergen-stimulated T-cell responses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部过敏性鼻炎(LAR)由提示过敏性鼻炎(AR)的临床病史定义。全身IgE测量阴性和对鼻过敏原攻击(NAC)的阳性反应。术语局部呼吸道过敏包括LAR,局部过敏性哮喘(支气管过敏原攻击中的阳性反应)和由AR和LAR共存定义的双重过敏性鼻炎。LAR随着时间的推移,合并症的严重程度和存在恶化,它是一个独立于AR的实体。地中海国家的患病率更高。36%的病例在儿童期发生LAR。LAR的病理生理特征是:鼻腔嗜酸性粒细胞性炎症增加,类胰蛋白酶和嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白,以及在20-40%的受试者的分泌物中存在鼻特异性IgE。最近的一项研究表明,随着IgECD38浆细胞的积累,LAR粘膜中IgE标志物的顺序类别转换重组增加。此外,外周血中粘膜归巢受体CXCR3+和CXCR4的B细胞表达增加,与Th9和Th2细胞的积累。NAC是诊断LAR的金标准。鼻腔分泌物嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验中特异性IgE的测定或仍不适于诊断。有充分的证据表明,在152例患者中4例DBPCRT后,变应原免疫疗法在LAR中的治疗中是有用的。总之,关于LAR的知识不断增加,详细定义了病理生理机制和新的表型。应该在不同的专家中提高对这种疾病的认识,NAC必须被视为任何年龄组的基本诊断工具,包括孩子。
    Local allergic rhinitis (LAR) is defined by a clinical history suggestive of allergic rhinitis (AR), negativity of systemic IgE measurement and positive response to nasal allergen challenge (NAC). The term local respiratory allergy includes LAR, local allergic asthma (positive response in bronchial allergen challenge) and dual allergic rhinitis defined by the coexistence of AR and LAR. LAR worsens in severity and presence of comorbidities over time, and it is an independent entity from AR. Prevalence is higher in Mediterranean countries. LAR onset occurs during childhood in 36% of cases. Physiopathological features of LAR are: increased nasal eosinophilic inflammation, tryptase and eosinophil cationic protein, and presence of nasal specific IgE in secretions of 20-40% of subjects. A recent study demonstrated increase in sequential class switch recombination to IgE markers in mucosa of LAR with accumulation of IgE+ CD38+ plasmablasts. Moreover, there is increased expression in B cells of mucosal homing receptors CXCR3+ and CXCR4 in peripheral blood, with accumulation of Th9 and Th2 cells. NAC is the gold standard in the diagnosis of LAR. The measurement of specific IgE in nasal secretions basophil activation test or are still not suitable for diagnosis. There is ample evidence of the usefulness of allergen immunotherapy in the treatment in LAR after 4 DBPCRT in 152 patients. In conclusion, knowledge about LAR is continuously increasing, with detailed definition of physiopathological mechanisms and new phenotypes. More awareness of the disease should be promoted among different specialists, and NAC must be considered an essential diagnostic tool in any age group, including children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景。局部过敏性鼻炎(LAR)是一种由鼻炎症状定义的表型,对全身致敏试验具有阴性反应,但具有专门的鼻过敏性炎症反应。儿科年龄组的数据很少,到目前为止还没有发布拉丁美洲的数据。方法。在诊断为鼻炎且无全身敏化的6至18岁患者中,用翼状尘螨和热带布洛姆进行了鼻过敏原攻击(NAC)。使用主观参数和声学鼻测监测NAC。该研究旨在确定在巴西专业门诊(过敏和免疫学)中先前诊断为非过敏性鼻炎(NAR)的儿童和青少年受试者的LAR。结果。在学习期间,我们分析了758个皮肤点刺试验(SPT)。其中,517(68.2%)被诊断为鼻炎。其中,18.4%(95/517)的SPT为阴性,符合纳入研究的标准。25名患者接受了NAC,其中40%(10/25),以前被认为有NAR,测试呈阳性,被重新分类为有LAR。根据分析的特点,临床上不可能区分LAR和NAR。Conclusions.这项研究代表了拉丁美洲儿童和青少年受试者的首次LAR调查,大大有助于理解其在该地理区域的流行和特征。在接受NAC治疗的缺乏全身敏化的患者亚组中,40%(10/25)表现为翼状尘螨和热带盲症的NAC阳性,保证将其重新分类为LAR。具有多种过敏原的NAC已被证明在儿科人群中安全可行,肯定其在LAR的准确诊断中的关键作用。
    Background. Local Allergic Rhinitis (LAR) is a phenotype defined by rhinitis symptoms with negative responses to systemic sensitization tests but with an exclusively nasal allergic inflammatory response. Data on the pediatric age group is scarce, and no Latin American data has been published so far. Methods. Nasal Allergen Challenge (NAC) was performed with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis in six- to 18-year-old patients diagnosed with rhinitis and no systemic sensitization. NAC was monitored using subjective parameters and acoustic rhinometry. The study aimed to identify LAR in child and adolescent subjects previously diagnosed with non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) in a Brazilian specialty outpatient clinic (Allergy and Immunology). Results. During the study period, we analyzed 758 skin prick tests (SPT). Of those, 517 (68.2%) were diagnosed with rhinitis. Among those, 18.4% (95/517) had a negative SPT, meeting the criteria for inclusion in the study. Twenty-five patients underwent NAC, and 40% (10/25) of them, previously considered to have NAR, had a positive test and were reclassified as having LAR. Based on the analyzed characteristics, clinically differentiating LAR from NAR was impossible. Conclusions. This study represents the first investigation of LAR in child and adolescent subjects in Latin America, contributing significantly to the understanding of its prevalence and characteristics in this geographic area. Among a subgroup of patients lacking systemic sensitization submitted to NAC, 40% (10/25) demonstrated a positive NAC with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and Blomia tropicalis, warranting their reclassification to LAR. NAC with multiple allergens has been proven safe and viable in pediatric populations, affirming its critical role in the accurate diagnosis of LAR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鼻腔和支气管粘膜中的类似免疫反应意味着鼻腔过敏原攻击(NAC)是针对过敏性鼻炎(AR)和哮喘的药物开发的合适的早期实验模型。我们评估了NAC的可重复性和鼻内皮质类固醇(INCS)对症状的影响,生理学,和炎症介质。
    方法:20名患有轻度特应性哮喘和AR的参与者接受了三次单盲鼻攻击,每次间隔三周(NCT03431961)。队列A(n=10)接受了对照盐水攻击,接下来是两个过敏原挑战。队列B(n=10)接受了NAC,没有治疗干预,然后是NAC,用生理盐水鼻喷雾剂(安慰剂)治疗14天,然后用INCS(220μg曲安奈德,每日两次)预处理14天的NAC。鼻吸附,鼻腔灌洗,血液样本,用力呼气容积1(FEV1),总鼻部症状评分(TNSS),在NAC后24小时内收集峰值鼻吸气流量(PNIF)。血清和鼻部样本中的总的和活性的类胰蛋白酶被测量为早期变态反应生物标志物(≤30分钟),IL-13和嗜酸性粒细胞计数被测量为晚期变态反应生物标志物(3-7小时)。周期再现性通过组内相关系数(ICC)评估,和样本量估计使用INCS后测量的效应大小进行。
    结果:NAC显著诱导了鼻吸收类胰蛋白酶和TNSS的急性增加,并降低了PNIF,并诱导鼻吸IL-13的后期增加,PNIF持续减少。NAC的可重复性因症状和生物标志物而异,NAC后5分钟的总胰蛋白酶具有最高的可重复性(ICC=0.91)。INCS治疗抑制了NAC诱导的IL-13,同时抑制了TNSS和PNIF的变化。对于类似的交叉研究,每个治疗组需要7名参与者来检测与TNSS的INCS相当的治疗效果。
    结论:NAC诱导的生物标志物和症状是可重复的,并且对INCS有反应。NAC适用于评估药物靶向过敏性炎症的药效学活性和机制证明。
    Similar immune responses in the nasal and bronchial mucosa implies that nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is a suitable early phase experimental model for drug development targeting allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma. We assessed NAC reproducibility and the effects of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) on symptoms, physiology, and inflammatory mediators.
    20 participants with mild atopic asthma and AR underwent three single blinded nasal challenges each separated by three weeks (NCT03431961). Cohort A (n = 10) underwent a control saline challenge, followed by two allergen challenges. Cohort B (n = 10) underwent a NAC with no treatment intervention, followed by NAC with 14 days pre-treatment with saline nasal spray (placebo), then NAC with 14 days pre-treatment with INCS (220 μg triamcinolone acetonide twice daily). Nasosorption, nasal lavage, blood samples, forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1), total nasal symptom score (TNSS), peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) were collected up to 24 h after NAC. Total and active tryptase were measured as early-phase allergy biomarkers (≤30 min) and IL-13 and eosinophil cell counts as late-phase allergy biomarkers (3-7 h) in serum and nasal samples. Period-period reproducibility was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and sample size estimates were performed using effect sizes measured after INCS.
    NAC significantly induced acute increases in nasosorption tryptase and TNSS and reduced PNIF, and induced late increases in nasosorption IL-13 with sustained reductions in PNIF. Reproducibility across NACs varied for symptoms and biomarkers, with total tryptase 5 min post NAC having the highest reproducibility (ICC = 0.91). Treatment with INCS inhibited NAC-induced IL-13 while blunting changes in TNSS and PNIF. For a similar crossover study, 7 participants per treatment arm are needed to detect treatment effects comparable to INCS for TNSS.
    NAC-induced biomarkers and symptoms are reproducible and responsive to INCS. NAC is suitable for assessing pharmacodynamic activity and proof of mechanism for drugs targeting allergic inflammation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:关于鼻过敏原激发后局部细胞因子分泌模式如何与临床症状相关的知识有限,尤其是在大约40-50%的过敏患者中发生的“晚期过敏反应”(LAR)方面。
    目的:在这项研究中,我们旨在表征对桦树花粉过敏原攻击的免疫和临床鼻反应,特别关注LAR。
    方法:在这项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验中,连续3天接受花粉提取物(n=20)或安慰剂(n=10)攻击桦树花粉过敏参与者.在第1天和第3天,在24小时时间过程中在选定的时间点收集鼻分泌物,用于测量33种炎性介质。通过主观症状评分和客观鼻气流测量确定临床反应。
    结果:与安慰剂相比,被激发的参与者的临床反应明显更大,并且在几分钟内显示出类胰蛋白酶和sST2的显着增加。20名被激发的参与者中有8名在过敏原激发后2-8小时显示出高IL-13水平。该组还显示出临床参数的显着变化,通过峰值鼻吸气流量测量的鼻气流二次下降,鼻塞症状增加,这与6小时的IL-13无反应者显着不同。
    结论:IL-13反应状态与过敏原激发后晚期的细胞因子和临床反应相关。
    There is limited knowledge on how local cytokine secretion patterns after nasal allergen challenge correlate with clinical symptoms especially with regard to the \"late allergic response,\" which occurs in approximately 40% to 50% of patients with allergy.
    We sought to characterize the immunologic and clinical nasal responses to birch pollen allergen challenge with a special focus on the late allergic response.
    In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, birch pollen-allergic participants were challenged with birch pollen extract (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) on 3 consecutive days. On days 1 and 3, nasal secretions were collected at selected time points over a 24-hour time course for the measurement of 33 inflammatory mediators. Clinical responses were determined through subjective symptom scores and objective nasal airflow measurements.
    Provoked participants had significantly greater clinical responses and showed significant increases in tryptase and the soluble IL-33 receptor serum stimulation 2 (sST2) in nasal secretions within minutes compared with the placebo group. Eight of 20 provoked participants displayed high IL-13 levels 2 to 8 hours after allergen provocation. This group also showed significant changes in clinical parameters, with a secondary drop in nasal airflow measured by peak nasal inspiratory flow and increased symptoms of nasal obstruction, which significantly differed from IL-13 nonresponders after 6 hours.
    IL-13 response status correlates with clinical responses and type 2 cytokine responses in the late phase after allergen provocation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    花粉变异会影响野外研究数据质量。鼻过敏原攻击(NAC)被认为是评估过敏性鼻炎的金标准,而环境暴露室(EEC)主要用于第二阶段药物开发研究。我们旨在研究3种不同条件下桦树诱导的过敏性鼻炎。
    这项研究包括30名对桦树花粉过敏的参与者,根据桦树皮穿刺试验,特异性免疫球蛋白E(IgE),和积极的NAC。参与者两次接触安慰剂,随后是2次连续4小时的桦树空气暴露,重复2次,以评估重现性和启动效果。鼻反应定义为NAC和EEC期间的总矫正鼻症状评分(ΔTNSS)≥5。主要终点是在首次过敏原暴露的最后2小时内测量TNSS。在自然暴露期间还分析了TNSS。
    在NAC期间最常产生阳性TNSS的剂量为175.2ng/200μL。18名参与者在第一次暴露的最后2小时内经历了ΔTNSS≥5,而21在所有4次暴露中均有阳性反应。安慰剂的平均ΔTNSS为1,桦木的平均ΔTNSS为6。暴露是可重复的,没有观察到的启动效应。机载Betv1为25ng/m3,而花粉季节的花粉测量值为279/m3。在花粉高峰季节,TNSS达到67.9%的参与者中的5。
    EEC结果与使用NAC和自然暴露获得的结果相似,提示EEC在过敏性鼻炎研究中的有用性。达到主要终点,60%的参与者经历了鼻腔反应。
    UNASSIGNED: Pollen variation can affect field study data quality. Nasal allergen challenge (NAC) is considered the gold standard for evaluating allergic rhinitis, while environmental exposure chambers (EECs) are mainly used in phase 2 drug development studies. We aimed to study birch-induced allergic rhinitis under 3 different conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included 30 participants allergic to birch pollen, based on birch skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), and positive NAC. Participants were exposed to placebo twice, followed by 2 consecutive 4-h birch airborne exposures, repeated on 2 occasions to evaluate reproducibility and priming effect. Nasal response was defined as total corrected nasal symptom score (ΔTNSS) ≥ 5 during NAC and EEC. The primary end-point was to measure TNSS during the last 2 h of first allergen exposure. TNSS was also analyzed during natural exposure.
    UNASSIGNED: The dose most commonly yielding positive TNSS during NAC was 175.2 ng/200 μL. Eighteen participants experienced ΔTNSS ≥5 during the last 2 h of the first exposure, whereas 21 had positive responses at all 4 exposures. Mean ΔTNSS was 1 with placebo versus 6 with birch. Exposures were reproducible, with no observed priming effect. Airborne Bet v 1 was 25 ng/m3, while the pollen measurement was 279/m3 during pollen season. TNSS reached 5 in 67.9% of participants during peak pollen season.
    UNASSIGNED: EEC outcomes were similar to those obtained with NAC and natural exposure, suggesting the usefulness of EEC in allergic rhinitis studies. The primary end-point was reached, as 60% of participants experienced nasal responses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特应性已被用作气道过敏的筛查方法。然而,空气过敏原不仅可以在特应性患者中引发呼吸道症状(特应性呼吸道过敏,ARA),而且在非特应性受试者中(局部呼吸道过敏,上帝抵抗军)。此外,ARA和LRA可以在同一患者中共存,这种临床情况被称为双重呼吸道过敏(DRA)。当临床病史无法确定ARA患者致敏的相关性时,鼻部,结膜或支气管过敏原挑战(NAC,CAC,还有BAC,分别)应该进行。此外,这些检测是确定LRA和DRA患者所必需的.气道疾病的过敏性触发因素的澄清对患者可以提供的管理策略具有深远的影响。重要的是,过敏原免疫疗法(AIT)仍然是ARA唯一的疾病改善干预措施。最近的数据表明,AIT可能对LRA患者具有类似的作用。然而,AIT的成功很大程度上取决于过敏个体的正确表型,NAC,CAC,和BAC在这方面是非常有用的工具。在这次审查中,我们将总结CAC的主要适应症和方法论,NAC,和BAC。重要的是,这些测试的临床实施可能会转化为精准医学方法,并为气道过敏患者带来更好的健康结果。
    Atopy has been long used as the screening method for airway allergy. Nevertheless, aeroallergens can trigger respiratory symptoms not only in atopic patients (atopic respiratory allergy, ARA), but also in non-atopic subjects (local respiratory allergy, LRA). Moreover, ARA and LRA can coexist in the same patient, and this clinical scenario has been called dual respiratory allergy (DRA). When the clinical history cannot determine the relevance of sensitizations in ARA patients, nasal, conjunctival or bronchial allergen challenges (NAC, CAC, and BAC, respectively) should be conducted. Moreover, these tests are required to identify patients with LRA and DRA. The clarification of the allergic triggers of airway diseases has a profound impact on the management strategies the patients can be offered. Importantly, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains as the only disease-modifying intervention for ARA. Recent data indicate that AIT might have a similar effect on LRA patients. Nevertheless, AIT success relies largely on the correct phenotyping of allergic individuals, and NAC, CAC, and BAC are very helpful tools in this regard. In this review, we will summarize the main indications and methodology of CAC, NAC, and BAC. Importantly, the clinical implementation of these tests might translate into precision medicine approaches and better health outcomes for patients with airway allergy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    猫过敏原诱导的AR在全球范围内的患病率正在增加,促使其使用受控方法进行研究。目前,用于研究猫过敏原诱导的AR的过敏原暴露模型有三种一般类别:自然暴露猫室,过敏原暴露室(AEC),和鼻过敏原挑战(NAC)。我们使用在线研究数据库评估了围绕使用这些模型研究猫过敏原诱导的AR的现有文献,包括OVIDMedline,Embase,和WebofScience。我们报告说,自然暴露猫室对于建立我们对猫过敏原诱导的AR的理解的基础非常重要。主要限制,包括可变的过敏原范围和不同的研究设计强调了对更标准化方案的需求。相比之下,AECs是模拟真实世界过敏原暴露并研究大样本量AR的长期影响的特殊模型。现有的AEC受到异构设施设计的限制,不同的猫过敏原分布方法,以及围绕成本和可访问性的问题。相反,NAC允许较小的参与者队列更容易进行生物采样,是第一阶段的理想选择,第二阶段或概念验证研究。NAC通常具有标准化的协议并且与AEC相比更便宜。然而,NAC仅捕获急性过敏原暴露,并且具有使用过敏原提取物而不是天然过敏原的进一步限制。由于组合受控方法的使用很少,我们建议同时使用AECs和NACs来研究AR的短期和长期效应,从而提供了猫过敏原诱导的AR的更全面的代表。
    The prevalence of cat allergen-induced AR is increasing worldwide, prompting its study using controlled methodology. Three general categories of allergen exposure models currently exist for the study of cat allergen-induced AR: natural exposure cat rooms, allergen exposure chambers (AEC), and nasal allergen challenges (NAC). We evaluated existing literature surrounding the use of these models to study cat allergen induced AR using online research databases, including OVID Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. We report that natural exposure cat rooms have been important in establishing the foundation for our understanding of cat allergen-induced AR. Major limitations, including variable allergen ranges and differing study designs highlight the need for a more standardized protocol. In comparison, AECs are an exceptional model to mimic real-world allergen exposure and study long-term implications of AR with large sample sizes. Existing AECs are limited by heterogeneous facility designs, differing methods of cat allergen distribution, and issues surrounding cost and accessibility. Conversely, NACs allow for smaller participant cohorts for easier biological sampling and are ideal for phase I, phase 2 or proof-of-concept studies. NACs generally have a standardized protocol and are less expensive compared to AECs. Nevertheless, NACs solely capture acute allergen exposure and have the further limitation of using allergen extracts rather than natural allergen. As the use of combined controlled methodologies is sparse, we recommend concurrent use of AECs and NACs to study short- and long-term effects of AR, thereby providing a more holistic representation of cat allergen-induced AR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号