medication adherence

药物依从性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南建议考虑将每周一次的顺铂作为头颈部癌症患者接受确定性放化疗的替代选择。然而,在最近的III期试验(ConCERT)中,20%的患者每周顺铂治疗不能总共接受200mg/m2,低依从性与每周顺铂和癌症控制结果的关系仍不清楚。为了填补这一知识空白,我们对接受每周一次顺铂确定性放化疗的头颈部癌患者进行了一项观察性队列研究.
    方法:我们的机构数据库查询了2007年11月至2023年4月期间接受每周顺铂(40mg/m2)确定性放化疗的非转移性头颈癌患者。坚持每周顺铂定义为接受至少5个周期,总累积剂量为200mg/m2。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估生存结果,对数秩测试,Cox比例风险多变量(MVA)分析。进行LogisticMVA以确定与每周顺铂依从性低相关的变量。进行Fine-GrayMVA分析以死亡为竞争性事件的失败结果。
    结果:在符合我们标准的119名患者中,51例患者(42.9%)每周顺铂依从性低。中位随访时间为19.8个月(四分位距8.8-65.6)。对每周顺铂的低依从性与较差的总生存期(校正风险比[aHR]2.94,95%置信区间[CI]1.58-5.47,p<0.001)和无进展生存期(aHR2.32,95%CI1.29-4.17,p=0.005)相关。它还与更严重的远处衰竭相关(aHR4.55,95%CI1.19-17.3,p=0.03),但不是局部失败(aHR1.61,95%CI0.46-5.58,p=0.46)。KPS<90是与每周顺铂依从性低相关的唯一变量(调整后比值比[aOR]2.67,95%CI1.10-6.65,p=0.03)。
    结论:我们的研究表明,超过40%的患者接受少于5个每周顺铂周期,并且每周顺铂依从性低是独立的,不良预后因素生存和远处失败的结果。那些每周顺铂依从性降低的人更有可能表现不佳。需要进一步的研究来提高对化疗的依从性和预后。
    BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline recommends consideration of weekly cisplatin as an alternative option for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation. However, in a recent phase III trial (ConCERT), 20% of patients treated with weekly cisplatin could not receive a total of 200 mg/m2, and the association of low adherence to weekly cisplatin and cancer control outcomes remains unclear. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed an observational cohort study of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin.
    METHODS: Our institutional database was queried for patients with non-metastatic head and neck cancer who underwent definitive chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m2) between November 2007 and April 2023. Adherence to weekly cisplatin was defined as receiving at least 5 cycles with a total cumulative dose of 200 mg/m2. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests, Cox proportional hazard multivariable (MVA) analyses. Logistic MVA was performed to identify variables associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Fine-Gray MVA was performed to analyze failure outcomes with death as a competing event.
    RESULTS: Among 119 patients who met our criteria, 51 patients (42.9%) had low adherence to weekly cisplatin. Median follow up was 19.8 months (interquartile range 8.8-65.6). Low adherence to weekly cisplatin was associated with worse overall survival (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-5.47, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (aHR 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.17, p = 0.005). It was also associated with worse distant failure (aHR 4.55, 95% CI 1.19-17.3, p = 0.03), but not locoregional failure (aHR 1.61, 95% CI 0.46-5.58, p = 0.46). KPS < 90 was the only variable associated with low adherence to weekly cisplatin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.67, 95% CI 1.10-6.65, p = 0.03).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that over 40% of patients underwent fewer than 5 weekly cisplatin cycles and that low adherence to weekly cisplatin was an independent, adverse prognostic factor for worse survival and distant failure outcomes. Those with reduced adherence to weekly cisplatin were more likely to have poor performance status. Further studies are warranted to improve the adherence to chemotherapy and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:药剂师需要更深入地了解患者对医学的看法,以针对他们的咨询和改善患者的预后。病人模拟练习,在那里,药学学生被要求消费类似药物的产品,已经被证明可以促进这种理解,尽管这是如何发生的细节,尤其是,学生们如何将他们的第一人称视角转向对真正患者的药物生活的概括,没有很好的记录。目的是通过引入有关真实患者的反思问题来确定学习过程的中心方面,并在研究期间跟踪学生的发展。
    方法:这项研究是在第4个学期的学生中进行的,他们在一个调查工具中被要求回答关于他们每天服用甘草产品一周的经历的自由文本问题,并回答患者的反思问题。定性演绎分析是通过根据“体验式学习”的概念对学生的经验进行编码来进行的。然后推断每个概念内的模式识别,他们的相互关系也是如此。
    结果:患者反思问题使学生能够将第一人称观点转向有关真实患者的药物生活的相关概括,包括涉及的心理机制以及实际患者群体在定期服药能力上的差异。学生在一周内面临挑战,遵循所需的剂量方案来更细致入微地认识到,药物依从性需要特别的努力,并限制了一个人的日常生活;因此,负面情绪参与了学习过程。
    结论:简单的患者模拟练习的设计引起了对患者使用药物的真实生活的新型见解。由于消极情绪干扰了学生的锻炼要求和正常的社交生活,以及对这项工作的承诺,是这个过程的重要方面。
    BACKGROUND: Pharmacists need more insight into patients\' perspectives on medicine to target their counseling and improve patient outcomes. Patient simulation exercises, where pharmacy students are asked to consume medicine-like products, have been shown to foster such understandings, although the specifics of how this occurs, in particularly, how students turn their first-person perspectives toward generalizations about real patients\' lives with medicines, are not well documented. The aim was to identify central aspects of the learning process by introducing reflection questions about real patients and follow students\' development during a study period.
    METHODS: The study was conducted with students in their 4th semester in the second year of Pharmacy Education at the University of Copenhagen who were asked to respond to free text questions in a survey instrument about their daily experiences of taking a licorice product for one week as well as answering patient reflection questions. Qualitative deductive analysis was performed by coding students\' experiences according to concepts of \'experiential learning\'. Pattern identification within each concept was then inferred, as were their interrelationships.
    RESULTS: Patient reflection questions enabled students to turn their first-person perspectives toward relevant generalizations about real patients\' lives with medicines, including involved psychological mechanisms and how real patient groups differ in their ability to take medicine regularly. Students who during the week faced challenges with following the required dosing scheme came to more nuanced realizations that medicine adherence requires special efforts and restricts one\'s daily life; hence, negative emotions were involved in the learning process.
    CONCLUSIONS: The design of the simple patient simulation exercise gave rise to new types of insights into real patients\' lives with medicines. Negative emotions due to interference between the requirements of the exercise and students\' normal social lives, as well as commitment to the exercise, were important aspects of this process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估糖尿病健康素养,坚持糖尿病药物治疗,及其在喀拉拉邦的相关因素,印度,流行病学转型中最先进的印度州,印度识字率最高。
    我们在280名糖尿病患者中进行了一项基于社区的横断面研究(平均年龄62岁,男性42%)通过多阶段整群抽样选择。有关社会人口统计学变量的信息是使用经过预先测试的结构化访谈时间表收集的。使用修订后的密歇根糖尿病知识测试评估糖尿病健康素养。使用Hill-Bone量表评估对糖尿病药物的依从性。采用二元Logistic回归分析,找出影响糖尿病健康素养和服药依从性的相关因素。
    35.7%[95%置信区间(CI):30.1-41.6]的患者报告了良好的糖尿病健康素养。33.2%的患者报告了对糖尿病药物的完美依从性(CI:27.7-39.1)。报告定期阅读报纸的患者[调整后优势比(AOR)3.16;CI:1.57-6.30],使用互联网(AOR2.23;CI:1.11-4.50)和使用胰岛素(AOR2.60;CI:1.35-5.00)的糖尿病健康素养较高.报告阅读健康杂志(AOR2.75;CI:1.01-7.60)的患者与未报告的患者相比,更有可能报告完美的药物依从性。
    为什么处于最识字状态的糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康素养和用药依从性较低,需要进一步调查。可以在糖尿病患者中进行干预以提高糖尿病健康素养和药物依从性,鼓励他们定期阅读报纸和健康杂志并使用互联网。
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to assess diabetes health literacy, adherence to diabetes medication, and its associated factors in Kerala, India, the most advanced Indian state in epidemiological transition with the highest literacy level in India.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a community-based cross-sectional study among 280 diabetes patients (mean age 62 years, male 42%) selected by multistage cluster sampling. Information on sociodemographic variables was collected using a pretested structured interview schedule. Diabetes health literacy was assessed using the revised Michigan Diabetes Knowledge test. Adherence to diabetes medication was assessed using the Hill-Bone subscale. Binary logistic regression analysis was done to find out the factors associated with diabetes health literacy and medication adherence.
    UNASSIGNED: Good diabetes health literacy was reported by 35.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.1-41.6] of the patients. Perfect adherence to diabetes medication was reported by 33.2% of patients (CI: 27.7-39.1). Patients who reported regular newspaper reading [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.16; CI: 1.57-6.30], using the internet (AOR 2.23; CI: 1.11-4.50) and insulin use (AOR 2.60; CI: 1.35-5.00) were more likely to report good diabetes health literacy compared to their counterparts. Patients who reported reading health magazines (AOR 2.75; CI: 1.01-7.60) were more likely to report perfect medication adherence compared to those who did not.
    UNASSIGNED: Why diabetes health literacy and medication adherence were low among diabetes patients in the most literate state needs further investigation. Interventions to enhance diabetes health literacy and medication adherence may be undertaken among diabetes patients encouraging them to read newspapers and health magazines regularly and use the internet.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于药物依从性在双相情感障碍(BD)患者中的重要性,这项来自一项正在进行的随机对照试验(RCT)的分析检查了BD症状之间的关系,69例粘附性差的BD成人的功能和依从性。
    研究纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁,BD1型或2型,药物依从性困难和积极症状,通过简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评分≥36,年轻躁狂评定量表(YMRS)>8或蒙哥马利·阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)>8。通过2种方式测量依从性:1)自我报告的片剂常规问卷(TRQ)和2)电子药丸容器监测(eCappillbox)。BD症状和功能用MADRS测量,YMRS,临床整体印象量表(CGI),全球功能评估(GAF)。仅检查筛选和基线数据。
    平均年龄42.32(SD=12.99)岁,72.46%(n=50)女性和43.48%(n=30)非白人。在筛查和基线时,使用TRQ错过BD药物治疗的过去7天平均百分比为40.63%(SD=32.61)和30.30%(SD=30.41)。分别。使用eCap的基线依从性为42.16%(SD=35.85),那些有eCap数据的人(n=41)。基于TRQ的较差依从性与较高的MADRS(p=0.04)和CGI(p=0.03)但较低的GAF(p=0.02)显着相关。eCAP测量的依从性与临床变量无显著相关。
    虽然抑郁和功能是依从性的近似标志,依赖患者自我报告或BD症状表现可能会导致服药行为的不完整情况。
    UNASSIGNED: Given the importance of medication adherence among individuals with bipolar disorder (BD), this analysis from an ongoing randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined the relationship between BD symptoms, functioning and adherence in 69 poorly adherent adults with BD.
    UNASSIGNED: Study inclusion criteria included being ≥ 18 years old with BD Type 1 or 2, difficulties with medication adherence and actively symptomatic as measured by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) score ≥ 36, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) > 8 or Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) > 8. Adherence was measured in 2 ways: 1) the self-reported Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) and 2) electronic pill container monitoring (eCap pillbox). BD symptoms and functioning were measured with the MADRS, YMRS, Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI), and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Only screening and baseline data were examined.
    UNASSIGNED: Mean age was 42.32 (SD = 12.99) years, with 72.46% (n = 50) female and 43.48% (n = 30) non-white. Mean past 7-day percentage of days with missed BD medications using TRQ was 40.63% (SD = 32.61) and 30.30% (SD = 30.41) at screening and baseline, respectively. Baseline adherence using eCap was 42.16% (SD = 35.85) in those with available eCap data (n = 41). Worse adherence based on TRQ was significantly associated with higher MADRS (p = 0.04) and CGI (p = .03) but lower GAF (p = 0.02). eCAP measured adherence was not significantly associated with clinical variables.
    UNASSIGNED: While depression and functioning were approximate markers of adherence, reliance on patient self-report or BD symptom presentation may give an incomplete picture of medication-taking behaviors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    调查影响中国类风湿关节炎(RA)患者健康素养(HL)的因素,为制定旨在提高患者生活质量的干预策略提供理论基础。
    自2022年5月至2022年12月,对中国某三级医院门诊患者和确诊为RA的住院患者进行了全面调查。调查利用了各种仪器,包括一般信息问卷,慢性病患者健康素养量表,健康评估问卷-残疾指数(HAQ-DI),中译类风湿关节炎自我效能感量表,中译类风湿关节炎病耻感量表,和中文翻译的风湿病治疗依从性问卷。
    HL的平均分数,自我效能感,药物依从性,残疾指数分别为83.54±17.43、84.91±14.37、70.16±11.24和0.26±0.44。中国RA患者HL与年龄呈负相关,红细胞沉降率(ESR),招标接头数量,肿胀的关节数量,和疾病活动,而与自我效能和服药依从性呈正相关。年龄,疾病活动,残疾指数,自我效能感,药物依从性是HL的预测因素,并初步构建了预测模型。
    在RA的管理中,医疗保健专业人员应通过重点提高药物依从性来制定和实施有效的干预措施,提高患者的自我效能感,改善患者的身体机能,减少疾病活动。这将有助于提高RA患者的健康素养并促进临床结局。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the factors that influence health literacy (HL) among Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and furnish theoretical underpinnings for the development of intervention strategies aimed at enhancing patients\' quality of life.
    UNASSIGNED: From May 2022 to December 2022, a comprehensive survey was conducted among both outpatients and inpatients diagnosed with (RA) in a tertiary hospital in China. The survey utilized various instruments, including a general information questionnaire, a chronic disease patient health literacy scale, the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), the Chinese-translated Rheumatoid Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale, the Chinese-translated Rheumatoid Arthritis Stigma Scale, and the Chinese-translated Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology Treatments.
    UNASSIGNED: The average scores of HL, self-efficacy, medication adherence, and disability index were 83.54 ± 17.43, 84.91 ± 14.37, 70.16 ± 11.24, and 0.26 ± 0.44, respectively. HL in Chinese RA patients was negatively correlated with age, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), number of tender joints, number of swollen joints, and disease activity, while positively correlated with self-efficacy and medication adherence. Age, disease activity, disability index, self-efficacy, and medication adherence are predictive factors of HL, and a predictive model has been initially constructed.
    UNASSIGNED: In the management of RA, healthcare professionals should develop and implement effective intervention measures by focusing on improving medication adherence, enhancing patients\' self-efficacy, improving patients\' physical function, and reducing disease activity. This will help enhance the health literacy and promote clinical outcomes in RA patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是a)探索与服药习惯形成相关的障碍和促进因素,b)引起对干预措施组成部分的反馈,该干预措施旨在帮助养成长期服药依从性的良好习惯。
    方法:研究设计是定性的;我们在2021年9月至2022年2月之间进行了半结构化访谈。
    方法:访谈是在网上进行的,在洛杉矶的Cedars-Sinai医疗中心招募了27名参与者,加州
    方法:20名18岁以上患者的目的样本,已被诊断患有高血压疾病(或报告高血压;>140/90mmHg),并且在招募时接受了抗高血压治疗,与七位供应商一起接受了采访。
    结果:背景因素包括频繁改变处方以调整方案,和多药房。健忘,感知到的药物需求,和常规中断被确定为习惯形成的可能障碍。习惯形成的促进者包括识别稳定的锚定程序,规划,使用外部提醒(包括视觉提醒)和药盒进行处方管理,以及养成习惯的外在动机。有趣的是,经历药物副作用被认为是习惯形成的可能障碍和可能促进者。对研究组件的反馈包括增加文本大小,和习惯传单的视觉吸引力;并赋予短信内容的变化,并将其频率调整为每天一次。患者通常赞成使用有条件的财务激励措施来支持习惯的形成。
    结论:该研究揭示了高血压患者习惯形成的一些关键因素。因此,未来的研究可能会评估我们发现的普遍性,考虑视觉提醒在习惯形成和维持中的作用,并探索对习惯的可能破坏。
    背景:NCT04029883。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to a) explore barriers and facilitators associated with medication-taking habit formation, and b) elicit feedback on the components of an intervention designed to help form strong habits for long-term medication adherence.
    METHODS: The study design was qualitative; we conducted semistructured interviews between September 2021 and February 2022.
    METHODS: The interviews were conducted online, with 27 participants recruited at the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, California.
    METHODS: A purposive sample of 20 patients who were over 18 years of age, had been diagnosed with hypertensive disorder (or reported high blood pressure; >140/90 mm Hg) and who were prescribed antihypertensive therapy at the time of recruitment, along with seven providers were interviewed.
    RESULTS: Contextual factors included frequent changes to prescription for regimen adjustment, and polypharmacy. Forgetfulness, perceived need for medication, and routine disruptions were identified as possible barriers to habit formation. Facilitators of habit formation included identification of stable routines for anchoring, planning, use of external reminders (including visual reminders) and pillboxes for prescription management, and extrinsic motivation for forming habits. Interestingly, experiencing medication side effects was identified as a possible barrier and a possible facilitator of habit formation. Feedback on study components included increasing text size, and visual appeal of the habit leaflet; and imparting variation in text message content and adjusting their frequency to once a day. Patients generally favoured the use of conditional financial incentives to support habit formation.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study sheds light on some key considerations concerning the contextual factors for habit formation among people with hypertension. As such, future studies may evaluate the generalisability of our findings, consider the role of visual reminders in habit formation and sustenance, and explore possible disruptions to habits.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04029883.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管定量研究已经描述了抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的障碍,更具探索性的方法将提供有关这些问题的深入信息,以及在个人和结构层面解决这些问题的潜在建议。我们设计了这项定性研究,以检查孟买关键人群(KP)抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的障碍和促进因素,印度。我们还想了解这些小组采用的策略,并获得改善对ART的依从性的建议。
    方法:这是对孟买四个KP亚组进行的七个焦点小组讨论(FGD)的定性分析。我们对女性性工作者(FSW)进行了两次FGD,男男性行为者(MSM),男女变性人/Hijras(TGH),和一个FGD与注射毒品的人(IDU)。我们转录了这些FGD的录音电子记录。我们还在转录的数据中添加了观察者关于群体动态的注释。我们使用框架方法来分析这些数据。
    结果:一些经验——比如ART药物的副作用——在不同的群体中很常见。然而,FSW报告了将监禁作为停止ART的原因,但其他KP没有报告。朋友和家人(包括Guru)是HIV感染者和坚持ART的重要支持系统。社区成员和普通社区的污名和歧视阻碍了ART中心和其他医疗保健设施的定期访问。导致错过剂量的其他因素是心理健康问题,酒精使用,并在警察突袭或在巡航地点抢劫期间放错了ART平板电脑。由于同龄人和社区之间常见的歧视根源是“绿皮书”(或他们的治疗书)的存在;关键人群希望艾滋病计划将其更改为数字卡,以便可以避免将其标记为“艾滋病毒阳性”,以避免被这本书看到。
    结论:定性研究帮助我们探索了主要人群中ART的障碍,社区为解决这些障碍提供了具体建议。除了以关键人群为中心的强化依从性咨询,可能需要改变一些行政指南和程序,以提高这些人群对ART的依从性.
    BACKGROUND: Even though quantitative studies have described barriers to anti-retroviral therapy (ART), a more exploratory approach will provide in-depth information on these issues, and potential suggestions to address these issues at individual as well as structural level. We designed this qualitative study to examine the barriers and facilitators for antiretroviral therapy adherence in key population (KP) in Mumbai, India. We also wanted to understand the strategies adopted by these groups and get suggestions to improve adherence to ART.
    METHODS: This is a qualitative analysis of seven focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted with four KP subgroups in Mumbai. We conducted two FGDs each with female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), male-to-female transgendered people/Hijras (TGH) each, and one FGD with people who inject drugs (IDU). We transcribed the audio-recorded electronic records of these FGDs. We also added the notes of the observers on the group dynamics to the transcribed data. We used the Framework Approach to analyse these data.
    RESULTS: Some experiences-such as side effects to ART medicines-were common across groups. However, incarceration as a reason for stopping ART was reported by FSWs but not by other KPs. Friends and family (including Guru) are important support systems for HIV infected individuals and adherence to ART. Stigma and discrimination by community members and general community prevent regular access of ART centres and other health care facilities. Additional factors which led to missed doses were mental health issues, alcohol use, and misplacing the ART tablets during police raids or during robbery attempts at the cruising sites. Since a common source of discrimination among peers and the community was the presence of \'Green book\' (or their treatment book); the key population wanted the AIDS program to change it to digital cards so that labelling one as \'HIV positive\' for being seen with the book can be avoided.
    CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative study helped us explore the barriers to ART among key population and the community provided specific suggestions to address them. In addition to Key Population centric enhanced adherence counselling, some administrative guidelines and procedures may need to be altered to improve adherence to ART in these populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:同性恋,双性恋,和其他男男性行为者(GBMSM)是罗马尼亚艾滋病毒传播的高危人群,然而,他们拥有很少的预防资源。尽管无法通过卫生系统正式获得暴露前预防(PrEP),罗马尼亚的GBMSM对这种药物表现出很高的需求和兴趣。预期在全国范围内推出PrEP,这项研究测试了一种新策略的功效,准备罗马尼亚,结合了两种基于证据的PrEP促进罗马尼亚GBMSM的干预措施。
    方法:本研究使用随机对照试验设计来检查居住在罗马尼亚的GBMSM是否接受罗马尼亚的准备,文化适应的咨询和移动健康干预(预期n=60),与分配到PrEP教育控制组的患者相比,PrEP的依从性和持久性更高(预期n=60)。来自罗马尼亚两个主要城市的参与者在随机分组后3个月和6个月接受PrEP和随访。PrEP依从性数据是通过每周自我报告调查和随访时的干血斑点测试获得的。潜在的调解员(例如,还评估了PrEP使用动机)的干预效果。此外,准备罗马尼亚的实施(例如,参加医疗就诊的登记参与者比例,干预经验)将通过与参与者的访谈进行检查,研究实施者,和医疗官员。
    结论:从这项研究中获得的知识将用于进一步完善和扩大罗马尼亚的规模,以进行未来的多城市有效性试验。通过研究支持PrEP依从性和持久性的工具的功效,这项研究有可能为PrEP在罗马尼亚和类似情况下的推广奠定基础。试验注册这项研究在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符NCT05323123,2022年3月25日
    BACKGROUND: Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) represent a high-risk group for HIV transmission in Romania, yet they possess few resources for prevention. Despite having no formal access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) through the health system, GBMSM in Romania demonstrate a high need for and interest in this medication. In anticipation of a national rollout of PrEP, this study tests the efficacy of a novel strategy, Prepare Romania, that combines two evidence-based PrEP promotion interventions for GBMSM living in Romania.
    METHODS: This study uses a randomized controlled trial design to examine whether GBMSM living in Romania receiving Prepare Romania, a culturally adapted counseling and mobile health intervention (expected n = 60), demonstrate greater PrEP adherence and persistence than those assigned to a PrEP education control arm (expected n = 60). Participants from two main cities in Romania are prescribed PrEP and followed-up at 3 and 6 months post-randomization. PrEP adherence data are obtained through weekly self-report surveys and dried blood spot testing at follow-up visits. Potential mediators (e.g., PrEP use motivation) of intervention efficacy are also assessed. Furthermore, Prepare Romania\'s implementation (e.g., proportion of enrolled participants attending medical visits, intervention experience) will be examined through interviews with participants, study implementers, and healthcare officials.
    CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge gained from this study will be utilized for further refinement and scale-up of Prepare Romania for a future multi-city effectiveness trial. By studying the efficacy of tools to support PrEP adherence and persistence, this research has the potential to lay the groundwork for PrEP rollout in Romania and similar contexts. Trial registration This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05323123 , on March 25, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项初步研究旨在调查台湾糖尿病患者的药物依从性,高血压,使用中文版的两部分药物不依从性量表(C-TPMNS)和国家健康保险(NHI)Medicloud系统。该研究揭示了导致不依从性的因素以及改善患者对慢性病药物依从性的影响。然而,小样本量限制了研究结果的普遍性。此外,该研究确定需要对更大和更多样化的样本进行进一步研究,以验证初步发现。
    方法:这项研究调查了台湾中部地区接受三高药物治疗的个体和从连锁药店退回过期药物的个体。进行了包括C-TPMNS在内的结构化问卷,以及病史和HbA1c的其他数据,LDL,并从NHIMedicloud系统收集血压水平。采用多元有序logistic回归和Wald检验方法进行数据分析。设置解释截止点以确定药物不依从性。
    结果:研究发现,25.8%的参与者不遵守处方药物。非粘附者的收缩压(SBP≥140mmHg)明显高于粘附者。不坚持也与低教育等因素有关,单一状态,独自生活,餐后葡萄糖浓度异常,和甘油三酯水平。C-TPMNS表现出良好的可靠性(Cronbach'sα=0.816)和有效性(ROC曲线下面积=0.72)。
    结论:该研究强调了不同决定因素的药物依从性的复杂性,并强调了定制干预措施的重要性。研究结果强调了针对特定地区的研究的必要性,以全面解决药物依从性问题。特别是关注高血压药物的依从性,高脂血症,和糖尿病。该研究还确定了对更大的需求,更多样化的研究来验证和扩展初步发现,并强调药剂师干预和患者授权在管理慢性病和改善整体健康结局方面的重要性。
    BACKGROUND: This pilot study aimed to investigate medication nonadherence among Taiwanese patients with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia using the Chinese version of the Two-Part Medication Nonadherence Scale (C-TPMNS) and the National Health Insurance (NHI) Medicloud system. The study revealed insights into the factors contributing to nonadherence and the implications for improving patient adherence to medications for chronic conditions. However, the small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the study identified the need for further research with larger and more diverse samples to validate the preliminary findings.
    METHODS: The study conducted surveys individuals in central Taiwan who received three-high medications and those who returned expired medications from chain pharmacies. A structured questionnaire including the C-TPMNS was administered, and additional data on medical history and HbA1c, LDL, and blood pressure levels were collected from the NHI Medicloud system. Data analysis was performed using multiple ordered logistic regression and Wald test methods. Setting interpretation cutoff point to determine medication nonadherence.
    RESULTS: The study found that 25.8% of participants were non-adherent to prescribed medications. Non-adherent individuals had significantly higher systolic blood pressure (SBP ≥ 140 mmHg) than adherent participants. Non-adherence was also associated with factors such as lower education, single status, living alone, abnormal glucose postprandial concentration, and triglyceride levels. The C-TPMNS demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach\'s alpha = 0.816) and validity (area under the ROC curve = 0.72).
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted the complexity of medication nonadherence with diverse determinants and emphasized the importance of tailored interventions. The findings underscored the need for region-specific research to comprehensively address medication nonadherence, especially focusing on adherence to medications for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. The study also identified the need for larger, more diverse studies to validate and expand upon the initial findings and emphasized the importance of pharmacist interventions and patient empowerment in managing chronic conditions and improving overall health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号