OBJECTIVE: To study medication adherence and persistence among heart failure patients, assess the methods utilised for estimating medication adherence, and identify optimal adherence thresholds and their impact on clinical outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Observational studies assessing medication adherence or persistence among heart failure patients via electronic healthcare databases will be included. A narrative synthesis will describe medication adherence and persistence reported and methods used to measure it. A meta-analysis will be attempted to evaluate the impact of secondary medication adherence (multiple and by drug class) on clinical outcomes, including hospitalisation, emergency visits, and mortality. The I2 statistic will be employed to study heterogeneity and the GRADE framework to evaluate evidence certainty. This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines and is registered with the Prospective Register of Ongoing Systematic Reviews CRD42024509542.
CONCLUSIONS: This study aims to evaluate medication adherence and persistence in heart failure management through electronic health databases, intending to explore widely used measurement methods and their limitations, and to identify adherence thresholds associated with improved clinical outcomes. By examining these aspects, we anticipate proposing enhancements for future research and establishing desired adherence goals. This approach highlights the expected significance of our findings in advancing patient care and research methodologies.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, a fundamental shift in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) took place due to the introduction of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. Adequate medication adherence is a prerequisite for their effectiveness, but little is known about adherence to CFTR modulators. We aimed to assess the extent of medication adherence to CFTR modulators in patients with CF and assess which characteristics are associated with adherence.
METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies needed to report adherence to CFTR modulators. Main outcomes were: 1) level of medication adherence and 2) associations of demographic and/or clinical characteristics with adherence.
RESULTS: In total, 4082 articles were screened and 21 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, seven studies were included. Most studies were retrospective and focused on adherence to ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor with only one focusing on elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. The majority used pharmacy refill data with adherence determined with the proportion of days covered (PDC) or the medication possession ratio (MPR). One study additionally used electronic monitoring and patient self-reported adherence. Adherence was 0.62-0.99 based on pharmacy data (PDC or MPR), 61% via electronic monitoring and 100% via self-report. Age <18 years appeared to be associated with good adherence, as was a higher lung function.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the wide variety of adherence methods used, adherence to CFTR modulators is suboptimal, based on objective measures such as pharmacy refill data or electronic monitoring. CFTR modulator adherence measurement and definitions requires more standardisation with a preference for objective and granular methods.

This article aims to evaluate the adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence in the Brazilian population based on peer-reviewed studies which used instruments exclusively designed and/or adapted for this purpose. A systematic review with meta-analysis based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was carried out in the BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and MEDLINE databases, as well as the AgeLine, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect academic search engines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Random effects models were used for a meta-analysis of the prevalence obtained from individual studies. A total of 104 studies were included in the meta-analysis on antihypertensive treatment in the Brazilian population, totaling 38,299 patients. The most used instrument was the four-item Morisky-Green Test (49.5%). The adherence prevalence estimated by the meta-analysis was 44.4% (95%CI: 39.12%-49.94%, I2 = 91.17, p < 0.001), showing high heterogeneity. The adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence found in national studies was unsatisfactory, demonstrating that this problem continues to be a major challenge.
O objetivo do artigo é avaliar a prevalência de adesão ao tratamento anti-hipertensivo na população brasileira, com base nos estudos revisados por pares, que utilizaram instrumentos elaborados e/ou adaptados exclusivamente para este fim. Revisão sistemática com meta-análise, baseada nas recomendações do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A busca foi realizada nas bases BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, MEDLINE, e nos buscadores acadêmicos AgeLine, Google Scholar e ScienceDirect. O protocolo foi registrado no PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Modelos de efeitos aleatórios foram usados para meta-análise das prevalências obtidas dos estudos individuais. Incluíram-se 104 estudos na meta-análise sobre tratamento anti-hipertensivo na população brasileira, totalizando 38.299 pacientes. O instrumento mais utilizado foi o teste de Morisky-Green de quatro itens (49,5%). A prevalência de adesão estimada pela foi de 44,4% (IC95%: 39,12%-49,94%, I2 = 91,17, p < 0,001), apresentando alta heterogeneidade. A prevalência de adesão ao tratamento anti-hipertensivo encontrada nos estudos nacionais foi insatisfatória, demonstrando que essa problemática continua sendo um grande desafio.

BACKGROUND: It is known that non-adherence to psychiatric medications has harmful consequences for both patients and society.
OBJECTIVE: To collect information on the incidence of non-adherence, and the factors and causes affecting adherence to psychopharmacological treatment in patients with severe and persistent mental disorders.
METHODS: A systematic review of scientific articles on adult patients (>17 years) published in the last five years (2015-2020) on specialised databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Scielo and BioMed. Original articles from indexed journals with an impact factor >0.5, in English or Spanish, with an analytical, prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional and randomised design were included. Once the articles were identified, they were analysed, extracting the information necessary to answer the research questions.
RESULTS: Fifteen articles were included. Of these, 40% (n = 6) were published in 2020, 20% (n = 3) were produced in China and 53.3% (n = 8) had an observational design. A total of 5,837 patients were included, of which 50.6% were men (n = 2,955), with moderate adherence (n = 10; 66.7%) reported in 10 investigations. Non-adherence varies from 7.7% to 60.6%. The factors that affect adherence are specific to the patient (age and sex), their family support network, and related to the disease or the treatment. The main cause of non-adherence is lack of insight.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to treatment with psychotropic drugs is multifactorial. Access to mental health services should be improved, with an emphasis placed on patient education and providing greater knowledge of mental illness. Interventions to promote education and interaction with the psychiatrist could be beneficial.

Tuberculosis and Mental Illness (TB-MI) often co-occur with a varying range of interactions of both. The rising incidence of both in Low- and Middle-income countries (LMICs) is an emergent public health problem with accompanying higher morbidity and complications in management. The objective of this review is to gather insights into how healthcare providers can enhance their support for patients with TB-MI, to improve treatment adherence and overall health outcomes. Addressing the complexities of TB-MI treatment requires a multi-component approach that includes psychological interventions, monitoring the course of mental health comorbidities, patient education, looking into barriers to adherence, and involving healthcare providers. These coupled with increased patient awareness, integrated care model, patient education and empowerment, simplified treatment approaches, social support programs, and sensitizing healthcare providers can decrease the burden on the healthcare system while improving patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy requires continuous management and treatment to optimize patient outcomes. The advancement of digital health has led to the development of various mobile health (mHealth) tools designed to enhance treatment adherence among individuals with epilepsy. These solutions offer crucial support through features such as reminders, educational resources, personalized feedback, assistance with managing costs, shared decision-making, and access to supportive communities. To design effective medication adherence mHealth solutions, it is essential to evaluate the effectiveness of existing mHealth tools, understand the unique circumstances of different patients, and identify the roles of health care professionals within the digital care pathway. Existing studies on epilepsy primarily focus on self-management, whereas the effectiveness and usability of medical adherence mHealth solutions often remain overlooked. Furthermore, the involvement of health care professionals in digital care pathways for epilepsy as well as the impact of adherence mHealth solutions on the patient experience have not been adequately explored.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of current mHealth solutions designed to improve medical adherence among patients with epilepsy. Furthermore, the study will examine the experiences of patients using mHealth solutions for maintaining medical adherence in epilepsy care. Finally, this review intends to determine the roles of health care professionals within mHealth systems aimed at supporting adherence to medication among patients with epilepsy.
METHODS: A systematic literature review has been selected as the appropriate method to address the research questions, adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion and exclusion criteria have been carefully selected, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses will be used to analyze the results. The expected results will mainly focus on the comparison, classification, and analysis of the effectiveness of current medical adherence mHealth tools. Moreover, the patient experiences using available medical adherence mHealth tools for epilepsy will be assessed. Finally, the role of health care professionals in the epilepsy digital care pathway will be explored, with emphasis on medical adherence.
RESULTS: The initial search, full-text screening, and data extraction have been carried out. Thirty-three papers were included in the final stage of the review. The study is expected to be completed by October 2024.
CONCLUSIONS: To enhance the digital care pathway for epilepsy, a medical adherence mHealth solution should be personalized, manage medications, include an alarm system, track seizures, support consultations, and offer updated treatment plans. This study aims to understand how findings from the research questions can improve mHealth solutions for individuals with epilepsy. Insights from this research on the effectiveness of current mHealth adherence solutions will provide guidance for developing future mHealth systems, making them more efficient and effective in managing epilepsy.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD4202347400; https://tinyurl.com/48mfx22e.
UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/55123.

BACKGROUND: The impact on cardiovascular health is lost when a patient does not obtain a newly prescribed lipid-lowering medication, a situation termed \"initial medication nonadherence\" (IMN). This research summarizes the published evidence on the prevalence, associated factors, consequences, and solutions for IMN to prescribed lipid-lowering medication in the United States.
METHODS: A systematic literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar, along with screening citations of systematic reviews, identified articles published from 2010 to 2021. Studies reporting results of IMN to lipid-lowering medications were included. Studies that evaluated non-adult or non-US populations, used weaker study designs (e.g., case series), or were not written in English were excluded.
RESULTS: There were 19 articles/18 studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Estimates of the prevalence of IMN to newly prescribed lipid-lowering medications ranged from 10 to 18.2% of patients and 1.4-43.8% of prescriptions (n = 9 studies). Three studies reported prescriber and patient characteristics associated with IMN. Hispanic ethnicity, Black race, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index score and no ED visits or hospitalization were associated with IMN. Lipid lowering prescriptions from primary care providers were also associated with IMN. Four studies described patient-reported reasons for IMN, including preference for lifestyle modifications, lack of perceived need, and side effect concerns. Four intervention studies reported mixed results with automated calls, live calls, or letters. One study reported worse clinical outcomes in patients with IMN: higher levels of low-density lipoprotein and greater risk of emergency department visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Up to one-fifth of patients fail to obtain a newly prescribed lipid-lowering medication but there is limited information about the clinical consequences. Future research should assess outcomes and determine cost-effective approaches to address IMN to lipid-lowering therapy.

UNASSIGNED: Medicare Part D plans are required to provide Medication therapy management (MTM) services to eligible beneficiaries to optimize medication utilization. Comprehensive medication review (CMR) is a core element of the MTM program. Despite the availability of advanced medical treatment for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), medication adherence to maintenance medications poses a continued challenge for patients with COPD.
UNASSIGNED: To examine the effects of CMR on medication adherence among patients with COPD.
UNASSIGNED: Medicare data for 2016-2017 linked to Area Health Resource Files were analyzed. The study population was Medicare beneficiaries with COPD. The intervention group consisted of beneficiaries who received CMR in 2017 but not in 2016. Patients who were eligible for MTM services but did not receive these services in 2016 or 2017 made up the control group. Propensity score matching was used to select an intervention and control group with balanced characteristics. The study outcome was adherence to COPD medications with the proportion of days covered at or above 80%. A difference-in-differences approach was adopted in the logistic regression analyses with an interaction term between the status of CMR receipt and the year 2017.
UNASSIGNED: The study sample included 25,564 patients with COPD. The proportions of adherent patients were similar in the control group in both years but increased significantly from 60.08% in 2016 to 69.38% in 2017 in the intervention group (P < .001). The odds of medication adherence in the intervention group increased from 2016 to 2017 by 59% more than in the control group (adjusted odds ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval = 1.48-1.71).
UNASSIGNED: Receiving CMR was associated with improved adherence to COPD medications among Medicare beneficiaries. Policymakers should ensure that Medicare beneficiaries with COPD receive CMR.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and all sexually and gender diverse (LGBTQ+) youth with HIV face multiple barriers to progression along the HIV care continuum. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions for interventions focused on improving linkage to care, retention in care, adherence to antiretroviral therapy, or viral suppression (VS) among LGBTQ+ youth with HIV in the United States. Included studies were published in English between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022, took place in the United States, and had samples with a minimum age of 12 years, a median or mean age of 24 years or less, and with ≥50% reporting an LGBTQ+ identity. Our search identified 11 interventions that met our criteria, of which only three were designed and tailored exclusively for LGBTQ+ populations. Interventions used a variety of modalities, including remote electronic delivery, in-person delivery, or both. Interventions most commonly aimed to enhance self-efficacy, HIV health knowledge, and medication self-management to facilitate improvements in HIV care continuum outcomes. Only two interventions showed statistically significant improvements in VS. More interventions tailored for LGBTQ+ youth are needed to end the HIV epidemic in the United States.

Pharmacist-led interventions are pivotal in identifying and resolving potential adverse drug events (pADEs) while enhancing blood pressure control and medication adherence through educational and counseling interventions. This practice brief outlines the outcomes of the Blue Bag Initiative (BBI), which enhanced pharmacist-led comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs) across community pharmacies in Virginia under Center for Disease Control Cooperative Agreement NU58DP006535. BBI yielded a rate of 131.6 pADEs identified per 100 participants and demonstrated cost savings of 1 to 3 million dollars for the health care system. This report underscores the significance of a standardized, pharmacist-led CMR as integral to interdisciplinary team-based care models within physician practices, facilitating medication therapy management implementation. Enhanced CMR can improve cardiovascular health outcomes while reducing health care expenditures by augmenting patient engagement and medication adherence. This study thus highlights the efficacy and potential of pharmacist-led interventions in increasing access to and optimizing patient care.