Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly prevalent metabolic disease, causing a heavy burden on healthcare systems worldwide, with related complications and anti-diabetes drug prescriptions. Recently, it was demonstrated that T2DM can be put into remission via significant weight loss using low-carbohydrate diets (LCDs) and very low-energy diets (VLEDs) in individuals with overweight and obesity. Clinical trials demonstrated remission rates of 25-77%, and metabolic improvements such as improved blood lipid profile and blood pressure were observed. In contrast, clinical trials showed that remission rate declines with time, concurrent with weight gain, or diminished weight loss. This review aims to discuss existing literature regarding underlying determinants of long-term remission of T2DM including metabolic adaptations to weight loss (e.g., role of gastrointestinal hormones), type of dietary intervention (i.e., LCDs or VLEDs), maintaining beta (β)-cell function, early glycemic control, and psychosocial factors. This narrative review is significant because determining the factors that are associated with challenges in maintaining long-term remission may help in designing sustainable interventions for type 2 diabetes remission.

UNASSIGNED: Dietary temperance significantly affects the quality of life of patients with Crohn\'s disease (CD) and remains a major concern. However, perceptions of diet in remission may have changed from the era when treatment options were limited. Therefore, we compared the dietary perceptions and treatment of patients with CD in remission with previously published data from the time biologic therapy was not introduced.
UNASSIGNED: We compared the data of 254 patients with CD in remission who completed a questionnaire survey in 2022 with those of 76 patients with CD in remission collected in 2003, when biologics were not used for maintenance therapy in Japan. Remission was defined as a CD activity index of 150 or less in both studies. Perceptions of diet (degree of eating whatever one likes) were assessed using single-item nominal scale responses.
UNASSIGNED: The percentage of patients receiving enteral nutrition therapy had decreased (past vs. present: 43.4 vs. 12.6%), while the proportion of patients receiving biologic therapy increased (0 vs. 88.6%, respectively). The percentages of patients who responded \"not at all,\" \"sometimes,\" and \"mostly\" when asked if they could eat whatever they liked had changed, respectively, from 9.2%, 46.1%, and 44.7% in the past to 4.3%, 25.2%, and 70.5% in the present.
UNASSIGNED: The proportion of those who ate whatever they liked and the mean body mass index increased in comparison with the corresponding values 20 years ago. With the advent of biologic therapies, the number of patients with CD who can enjoy eating has increased.

BACKGROUND: Fecal microbial transplantation (FMT) is a promising new method for treating active ulcerative colitis (UC), but knowledge regarding FMT for quiescent UC is scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate FMT for the maintenance of remission in UC patients.
METHODS: Forty-eight UC patients were randomized to receive a single-dose FMT or autologous transplant via colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was set to the maintenance of remission, a fecal calprotectin level below 200 μg/g, and a clinical Mayo score below three throughout the 12-mo follow-up. As secondary endpoints, we recorded the patient\'s quality of life, fecal calprotectin, blood chemistry, and endoscopic findings at 12 mo.
RESULTS: The main endpoint was achieved by 13 out of 24 (54%) patients in the FMT group and by 10 out of 24 (41%) patients in the placebo group (log-rank test, P = 0.660). Four months after FMT, the quality-of-life scores decreased in the FMT group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.017). In addition, the disease-specific quality of life measure was higher in the placebo group than in the FMT group at the same time point (P = 0.003). There were no differences in blood chemistry, fecal calprotectin, or endoscopic findings among the study groups at 12 mo. The adverse events were infrequent, mild, and distributed equally between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in the number of relapses between the study groups at the 12-mo follow-up. Thus, our results do not support the use of a single-dose FMT for the maintenance of remission in UC.

ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are a group of rare, primary, systemic necrotizing small-vessel vasculitides. Granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis account for ∼80-90% of all AAV. Exposure to silica dust, farming and chronic nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage are associated with increased risk of developing AAV. When a diagnosis of AAV is suspected, as in patients with multisystem organ dysfunction or those with features such as chronic recurrent rhinosinusitis, cavitated lung nodules, palpable purpura or acute kidney injury, then appropriate further investigations are needed, including ANCA testing. In this scenario, a structured clinical assessment should be conducted, evaluating all the organs possibly involved, and tissue biopsy may be necessary for confirmation of the diagnosis. Therapeutic algorithms vary based on the severity of AAV, the clinical diagnosis/ANCA specificity, and the patient\'s age, weight, comorbidities and prognosis. Recent data favour rituximab as a preferable option for both induction and maintenance of remission. In addition, regimens with less glucocorticoids are equally effective and safer in inducing remission compared with conventional regimens, and avacopan is an effective glucocorticoid-sparing option. In contrast, there is not compelling evidence to support the routine use of plasma exchange in addition to standard remission-induction therapy in AAV. ANCA and other biomarkers can be helpful in association with clinical assessment to guide diagnosis and treatment decisions. Patients should be frequently evaluated during follow-up for possible disease relapses or treatment-related morbidity, and for monitoring damage accrual, especially metabolic and cardiovascular damage.

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) are chronic conditions that create a significant disease burden on millions of patients while adding a major financial burden to societies and healthcare systems. The introduction of biologic medicines has contributed majorly to improving the clinical outcomes of IMIDs and as such these modalities have gained first- or second-line positions in a wide range of treatment guidelines from different international clinical societies. However, the high cost of these biologics traditionally limited their accessibility and delayed their initiation, leaving millions of patients with unmet medical needs for a more affordable and sustainable solution. The introduction of cost-efficient biosimilar anti-TNFs within Europe since 2013 has allowed more patients with IMIDs to access biologic therapies earlier and for longer, potentially altering the course of the disease into a milder phenotype and reducing the long-term disease burden. This review provides the latest evidence for the impact of biosimilars on patient outcomes and demonstrates their clinical value beyond a reduction in price.

Standard of care treatment for AIH includes prednisone monotherapy or dual therapy prednisone-azathioprine. However, many hepatologists alternatively use azathioprine monotherapy to avoid side effects of long-term corticosteroids.
To determine whether azathioprine monotherapy is comparable to dual prednisone-azathioprine for maintenance of remission in AIH.
A retrospective chart review of 260 individuals with AIH from a single institution was performed; 45 individuals were included. Exclusion criteria included concomitant PBC or PSC, use of alternative treatment regimen, and/or failure to reach remission. Treatment regimen received was guided by clinician standard of practice, not patients\' clinical factors. Initial remission was defined as normalization of serum ALT for at least two consecutive blood draws. Data were analyzed for 5 years post-remission, recording outcome and dose of prednisone and/or azathioprine.
83% of individuals were female, and average age was 65 years. Median dose of prednisone and azathioprine for the dual-therapy group was 5 mg and 100 mg, respectively, while median azathioprine dose for the monotherapy group was 75 mg. Considering overall outcome, 93% of all patients maintained remission. 80% of the dual-therapy group, and 95% of the azathioprine monotherapy group maintained remission. Using Chi-square analysis to compare the maintenance of remission between dual therapy and azathioprine monotherapy, a p value of 0.28 was calculated.
AASLD guidelines recommend dual prednisone-azathioprine as standard of care for maintenance of remission in AIH. Our results suggest that azathioprine monotherapy is equivalent to prednisone-azathioprine. Azathioprine monotherapy offers a significant advantage in mitigating risks of long-term corticosteroid therapy.

Inhibition of Janus kinases [JAKs] in Crohn\'s disease [CD] patients has shown conflicting results in clinical trials. Tofacitinib, a pan-JAK inhibitor, showed efficacy in ulcerative colitis [UC] and has been approved for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe UC. In contrast, studies in CD patients were disappointing and the primary end point of clinical remission could not be met in the respective phase II induction and maintenance trials. Subsequently, the clinical development of tofacitinib was discontinued in CD. In contrast, efficacy of filgotinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in CD patients was demonstrated in the randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase II FITZROY study. Upadacitinib also showed promising results in a phase II trial in moderate to severe CD. Subsequently, phase III programmes in CD have been initiated for both substances, which are still ongoing. Several newer molecules of this class of orally administrated immunosuppressants are being tested in clinical programmes. The concern of side effects of systemic JAK inhibition is addressed by either exclusively intestinal action or higher selectivity [Tyk2 inhibitors]. In general, JAK inhibitors constitute a new promising class of drugs for the treatment of CD.

Objective Little information is available on the relationship between the clinical course of ulcerative colitis (UC) and the outcomes of pregnancy and delivery in pregnant Japanese women. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the factors that influence pregnancy and childbirth in middle-aged UC patients. Methods We studied 53 pregnancies in 45 pregnant women with UC who delivered at our department. They included 41 pregnancies that started while in UC remission and 12 pregnancies that started in the UC active phase. The following factors were evaluated: 1) the clinical course of UC; 2) the frequency and details of abnormal pregnancy/abnormal delivery; and 3) the course of pregnancy/delivery. We compared the clinical features, course of UC, and details of treatment between women with a normal pregnancy/delivery and those with an abnormal delivery. Results A comparison of the remission and acute groups showed lower clinical activity indices (CAIs) during pregnancy in the remission group and significantly higher rates of recurrence/exacerbation in the active group (75%) than in the remission group (7.3%). The respective CAIs in the first, second, and third trimesters were 3 and 6, 3 and 5, and 3 and 4, in the remission and active groups, respectively. Live infants were delivered in 51 (96%) pregnancies, with 7 (17%) abnormal pregnancies in the remission group and 4 (33.3%) in the active group (p>0.05). Abnormal delivery occurred in 16 of 53 (30.1%) pregnancies, and the rate was higher in the remission group than in the active group (p>0.05). In both groups, the most common abnormal event during pregnancy was delivery of low-birth-weight infants. Delivery was normal in 37 cases and abnormal in 16 cases. A multivariate analysis showed that a shorter UC disease duration (odds ratio=1.16) and higher CAI in the first trimester (odds ratio=1.49) were associated with an increased risk of abnormal pregnancy. Conclusion Our findings demonstrated that the clinical course of UC, as evaluated by the CAI, during pregnancy influenced the outcome of pregnancy and delivery.

BACKGROUND: Anti-TNF agents are the mainstay of therapy in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) not responding to 5-aminosalisylic acid, corticosteroids, immunmodulators and for patients dependent on corticosteroids. There is a therapeutic gap of 30%- 60% with infliximab and adalimumab, which is required to be bridged by newer agents. The present review summarizes the literature on the role of golimumab, a new anti TNF agent, in ulcerative colitis.
METHODS: Literature search was done on PubMed using the search terms \'golimumab\' AND \'ulcerative colitis\' from inception till March 2016. Golimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against TNF-α, was approved by FDA for clinical use in UC in 2013. In vitro studies showed golimumab to be better than infliximab and adalimumab in terms of affinity and neutralization of TNF-α and its conformational stability. Golimumab was found to be effective and safe in inducing and maintaining clinical remission, clinical response and mucosal healing in patients with UC in the two registration trials. Expert commentary: Although there is no difference in terms of efficacy between golimumab, infliximab and adalimumab, golimumab is better than infliximab in terms of route of administration (subcutaneous vs intravenous) and better than adalimumab in terms of frequency of dosing (4 weeks vs 2 weeks).

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine is used as maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis but the optimal dosage is still controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the remission-maintenance efficacy and tolerability of two daily doses of oral mesalazine (4.8 g and 2.4 g) in patients with ulcerative colitis with frequent relapses in a randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: 112 ulcerative colitis patients in remission were enrolled and randomly allocated to treatment for 1 year with oral mesalazine at a daily dose of 4.8 g (n=56, Group A) or 2.4 g (n=56, Group B).
RESULTS: At the end of the 12 months, intention to treat analysis revealed persistent remission in 42 (75%) in Group A and 36 (64.2%) in Group B (p=0.3). The higher daily dose (4.8 g) proved to be significantly more effective for maintaining remission in patients under 40 years of age (90.5% Group A vs. 50% Group B; Fisher\'s exact test, p=0.0095) and in those with extensive disease (90.9% Group A vs. 46.7% Group B; Fisher\'s exact test, p=0.0064).
CONCLUSIONS: In ulcerative colitis patients younger than 40 years and/or with extensive disease, a daily dose of 4.8 g oral mesalazine results in increased rates and duration of remission compared to 2.4 g.