low molecular weight heparin

低分子量肝素
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:本文分析了APSN患者的妊娠轨迹和治疗方案。目的探讨妊娠期APSN的治疗方法和预防措施。
    方法:本文报道了使用APSN的primigravida的轨迹和治疗方案文件。APSN是在妊娠11周时26岁的初产妇中发现的。初始治疗方案包括每天给药泼尼松10mg,羟氯喹200毫克,dapparin5000IU,阿司匹林50毫克。胎龄为20+3周,dapparin的剂量被修改为5000IU/另一天,在胎龄30+3周时,尿蛋白水平显着升高。达帕宁钠的初始剂量被更新。患者在妊娠38+3周时分娩,无其他并发症。
    结论:必须承认,在怀孕期间不应随意改变药物的剂量和给药方式。
    OBJECTIVE: This paper presents an analysis of the pregnancy trajectory and therapeutic regimen documentation of a primigravida with APSN. It aims at communicating the therapeutic approach and preventive measures for APSN in pregnancy.
    METHODS: This paper reports the trajectory and therapeutic regimen documentation of a primigravida with APSN. The APSN was discovered in a primigravida woman aged 26 years at 11 weeks of gestation. The initial therapy regimen consists of daily administration of prednisone 10 mg, hydroxychloroquine 200 mg, dapparin 5000 IU, and aspirin 50 mg. At a gestational age of 20 + 3 weeks, the dosage of dapparin was modified to 5000 IU/other day, along with a significant rise in urinary protein level seen at 30 + 3 weeks of gestational age. The initial dosage of dapanin sodium was renewed. The patient delivered at 38 + 3 weeks of gestation without other complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is imperative to acknowledge that altering the dosage and administration of medication should not be done haphazardly during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述旨在系统地总结治疗性依诺肝素在肥胖患者中的疗效和安全性的现有数据,并找出指导未来研究的差距。
    Medline和Embase系统搜索了符合条件的研究(最后一次搜索是2023年12月20日)。如果他们报告了治疗给药方案,不良出血,血栓性结果,或抗因子Xa(AFXa)监测肥胖成年患者。
    系统评价管理工具Covidence用于管理研究选择和数据提取过程。筛选来自符合条件的研究的参考列表以确定任何其他符合条件的研究。
    分析中包括16项研究。研究使用了多种剂量,适应症,和研究设计使比较困难。12项研究报告了血栓形成事件的发生率(中位数=1.3%[四分位距[IQR]=0.3%-2.3%]),所有研究报告了出血事件的发生率(中位数=5.7%[IQR=2.4%-14.5%])。分析体重/体重指数(BMI)或每公斤剂量对AFXa水平的影响的8项研究中的两项报告了统计学上的显着结果。一项研究得出结论,BMI不会影响目标AFXa水平的实现。然而,第二项研究发现,在肥胖人群中,使用实际体重给药是超治疗AFXa水平的独立预测因子.
    这是第一次全面审查,重点是依诺肝素在肥胖症中的治疗剂量,并已根据系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)2020声明的首选报告项目进行。其中七项研究自2018年以来发表,表明关于这一主题的新证据正在出现。
    由于研究的异质性,没有足够的证据支持肥胖患者的最佳给药策略。AFXa监测可能适合于指导该人群的给药。需要进一步研究以确定合适的给药方案。
    UNASSIGNED: This review aims to systematically summarize the available data on efficacy and safety of therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients and to identify gaps to guide future research.
    UNASSIGNED: Medline and Embase were systematically searched for eligible studies (last searched December 20, 2023). Studies were included if they reported on therapeutic dosing regimens, adverse bleeding, thrombotic outcomes, or antifactor Xa (AFXa) monitoring in obese adult patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The systematic review management tool Covidence was used to manage the study selection and data extraction process. The reference list from eligible studies was screened to determine any additional eligible studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixteen studies were included in the analysis. Studies used a variety of doses, indications, and study designs making comparison difficult. Twelve studies reported the incidence of thrombotic events (median = 1.3% [interquartile range [IQR] = 0.3%-2.3%]) and all studies reported the incidence of bleeding events (median = 5.7% [IQR = 2.4%-14.5%]). Two of the 8 studies analyzing the influence of weight/body mass index (BMI) or dose per kg on AFXa levels reported statistically significant results. One study concluded that BMI did not affect achievement of target AFXa levels. However, the second study found that dosing using actual body weight was an independent predictor of supratherapeutic AFXa levels in the obese population.
    UNASSIGNED: This is the first comprehensive review with a focus on therapeutic dosing of enoxaparin in obesity and has been conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Seven of the included studies were published since 2018 indicating that new evidence on this topic is emerging.
    UNASSIGNED: There was inadequate evidence to support an optimal dosing strategy in obese patients due to the heterogeneity of the studies. The AFXa monitoring may be appropriate to guide dosing in this population. Further research is required to determine a suitable dosing regimen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    炎症因子和活性氧(ROS)是动脉粥样硬化的危险因素。许多现有的疗法使用ROS敏感的递送系统来缓解动脉粥样硬化。取得了一定的疗效,但不能消除过量的ROS。此外,通过化学合成载体材料的潜在生物安全问题不容忽视。在这里,两亲性低分子量肝素-硫辛酸缀合物(LMWH-LA)用作ROS敏感载体材料,由临床使用的可注射药物分子组成,避免未知的副作用。LMWH-LA和姜黄素(Cur)自组装形成LLC纳米颗粒(LLCNP),LMWH为壳,LA/Cur为核,其中LMWH可以靶向斑块内皮细胞的P-选择素,竞争性阻断单核细胞向内皮细胞的迁移,从而抑制ROS和炎症因子的产生,LA可以被氧化引发亲水-疏水转化并加速Cur的释放。在斑块内释放的Cur进一步发挥抗炎和抗氧化作用,从而抑制ROS和炎症因子。我们用了超声成像,病理和血清分析,以评估纳米颗粒对apo-/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化斑块的治疗作用,结果表明,LLC具有明显的抗动脉粥样硬化作用。我们的发现为动脉粥样硬化的治疗提供了有希望的治疗纳米药物。
    Inflammatory factors and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are risk factors for atherosclerosis. Many existing therapies use ROS-sensitive delivery systems to alleviate atherosclerosis, which achieved certain efficacy, but cannot eliminate excessive ROS. Moreover, the potential biological safety concerns of carrier materials through chemical synthesis cannot be ignored. Herein, an amphiphilic low molecular weight heparin- lipoic acid conjugate (LMWH-LA) was used as a ROS-sensitive carrier material, which consisted of injectable drug molecules used clinically, avoiding unknown side effects. LMWH-LA and curcumin (Cur) self-assembled to form LLC nanoparticles (LLC NPs) with LMWH as shell and LA/Cur as core, in which LMWH could target P-selectin on plaque endothelial cells and competitively block the migration of monocytes to endothelial cells to inhibit the origin of ROS and inflammatory factors, and LA could be oxidized to trigger hydrophilic-hydrophobic transformation and accelerate the release of Cur. Cur released within plaques further exerted anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects, thereby suppressing ROS and inflammatory factors. We used ultrasound imaging, pathology and serum analysis to evaluate the therapeutic effect of nanoparticles on atherosclerotic plaques in apoe-/- mice, and the results showed that LLC showed significant anti-atherosclerotic effects. Our finding provided a promising therapeutic nanomedicine for the treatment of atherosclerosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估抗凝剂治疗孤立性表静脉血栓形成(iSVT)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:根据PRISMA2020指南进行了系统评价,用于研究抗凝血剂治疗iSVT的随机对照试验(RCT)。血栓性并发症的主要终点包括iSVT进展/复发的任何事件以及新发(深静脉血栓形成)DVT或(肺栓塞)PE的发展。
    结果:8例RCT和4721例患者,每天一次使用2.5mg磺达肝素治疗,利伐沙班10毫克,治疗性的,中间,和预防性低分子量肝素(LMW)。与安慰剂相比,所有抗凝剂在血栓并发症和iSVT进展/复发方面均显示出统计学上显著的风险降低,只有磺达肝素可以降低DVT/PE的风险.此外,与预防性和治疗性LMWH相比,磺达肝素在减少DVT/PE事件方面的疗效增强.此外,利伐沙班和磺达肝素在预防血栓并发症方面表现出优于所有三种LMWH给药方案,两者之间没有显着差异。风险比RR1.00(95CI:0.51-1.92)。SUCRA认为磺达肝素是血栓并发症最有效的治疗方法。(SUCRA,91.6)和DVT/PE,(SUCRA,96)和利伐沙班在iSVT进展/复发方面(SUCRA,94.68).最终,尽管存在某些模型限制,meta回归分析提示血栓并发症治疗持续时间较长,结局可能有改善的趋势β=-0.34(95CI:-16.39至12.23).
    结论:尽管存在固有的局限性,例如治疗持续时间和随访时间的差异,这篇综述显示了磺达肝素的疗效,利伐沙班和LMWH治疗iSVT。在DVT/PE结局方面,磺达肝肝素相对于治疗性LMWH的疗效提高,需要谨慎解释,强调需要通过充分有效的RCT进行进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Assess the safety and efficacy of anticoagulants in treating isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT).
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating anticoagulants in the treatment of iSVT. The primary endpoint of thrombotic complications encompassed any incident of iSVT progression/recurrence and the development of new-onset (deep vein thrombosis) DVT or (pulmonary embolism) PE.
    RESULTS: Eight RCT\'s and 4721 patients treated once daily with either fondaparinux 2.5 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, therapeutic, intermediate, and prophylactic low molecular weight heparin (LMW) were included. While all anticoagulants displayed a statistically significant risk reduction compared to placebo in terms of thrombotic complications and iSVT progression/recurrence, only fondaparinux reduced the risk for DVT/PE. Additionally, fondaparinux exhibited enhanced efficacy in decreasing DVT/PE events relative to prophylactic and therapeutic LMWH. Furthermore, rivaroxaban and fondaparinux demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of preventing thrombotic complications compared to all three dosing regimens of LMWH without significant differences between the two, risk ratio RR 1.00(95%CI:0.51-1.92). SUCRA identified fondaparinux as the most effective treatment regarding thrombotic complications, (SUCRA,91.6) and DVT/PE, (SUCRA,96) and rivaroxaban in terms of iSVT progression/recurrence (SUCRA,94.68). Ultimately and despite certain model limitations, meta-regression analysis suggested a possible trend towards improved outcomes with longer treatment durations for thrombotic complications β = -0.34(95%CI:-16.39to12.23).
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite inherent limitations such as variations in treatment durations and follow-up periods, this review displayed the efficacy of fondaparinux, rivaroxaban and LMWH in treating iSVT. The improved efficacy of fondaparinux over therapeutic LMWH in terms of DVT/PE outcomes necessitates cautious interpretation underscoring the need for further investigation through adequately powered RCTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    普通肝素(UH)或低分子量肝素(LMWH)的皮下注射通常用于静脉血栓栓塞的化学预防。我们以前发现,护士认为与LMWH依诺肝素相比,UH患者的疼痛更多;然而,没有发表的具有适当功效的研究比较了皮下化学预防相关的疼痛.我们的目的是评估与皮下施用UH和依诺肝素相关的疼痛是否存在差异。我们对2017年11月至2019年4月接受腹部大手术的患者进行了一项观察性研究。所有患者均接受三种预防方案之一:(1)仅UH,(2)UH的初始剂量,然后是依诺肝素,或(3)仅依诺肝素。在观察到的74名患者中,40名患者接受了UH,然后接受了依诺肝素,17只收到UH,17只接受了依诺肝素。皮下UH和依诺肝素注射的患者平均感觉疼痛有显著差异(UH3.3后平均注射后疼痛与依诺肝素1.5;p<0.001)。连续接受UH或依诺肝素注射的患者在感知疼痛方面没有显着差异。与不同化学预防药物相关的疼痛差异可能是患者拒绝VTE化学预防的未被识别的驱动因素,并可能导致更差的VTE结局。
    Subcutaneous injection of unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently utilized for venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis. We previously discovered that nurses believe patients experience more pain with UH compared to the LMWH enoxaparin; however, no published studies that are appropriately powered exist comparing pain associated with subcutaneous chemoprophylaxis. Our objective was to assess if differences exist in pain associated with subcutaneous administration of UH and enoxaparin. We conducted an observational study of patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between 11/2017-4/2019. All patients received one of three prophylactic regimens: (1) UH only, (2) Initial dose of UH followed by enoxaparin, or (3) enoxaparin only. Of the 74 patients observed, 40 patients received UH followed by enoxaparin, 17 received UH only, and 17 received enoxaparin only. There was a significant difference in patients\' mean perceived pain between subcutaneous UH and enoxaparin injections (mean post-injection pain after UH 3.3 vs. enoxaparin 1.5; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in perceived pain for patients who received consecutive UH or enoxaparin injections. Differences in pain associated with different chemoprophylaxis agents may be an unrecognized driver of patient refusals of VTE chemoprophylaxis and may lead to worse VTE outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:中央神经轴阻滞(CNB)后迟发性硬膜外血肿(SEH)是一种罕见但严重的并发症。与神经轴麻醉相关的SEH的根本原因仍不清楚。此外,SEH手术干预和保守治疗之间的决定仍然是一个复杂且未解决的问题.
    方法:我们报告一例在腰硬联合麻醉下接受阴式子宫切除术的73岁女性延迟SEH,在术后第一天(POD)给予术后抗凝剂以防止深静脉血栓形成。她在CNB后56小时出现症状。磁共振成像(MRI)显示L1-L4水平的背侧SEH,并压迫鞘囊。保守治疗,六个月后实现了完全康复。
    结论:此病例提醒麻醉医师应警惕CNB后可能发生的SEH延迟,特别是抗凝剂的给药。建议立即对神经功能缺损和MRI进行神经系统评估。保守治疗结合密切和动态的神经功能监测可能是可行的,对于轻度或非进行性症状甚至自发恢复的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Delayed spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) following central neuraxial block (CNB) is a rare but serious complication. The underlying causes of SEH associated with neuraxial anesthesia are still unclear. Furthermore, the decision between surgical intervention and conservative management for SEH remains a complex and unresolved issue.
    METHODS: We report a case of delayed SEH in a 73-year-old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with the administration of postoperative anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis on the 1st postoperative day (POD). She experienced symptoms 56 h after CNB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dorsal SEH at the L1-L4 level with compression of the thecal sac. On conservative treatment, full recovery was achieved after six months.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case reminds anesthesiologists should be alert to the possible occurrence of a delayed SEH following CNB, particularly with the administration of anticoagulants. Immediate neurological evaluation of neurological deficit and MRI are advised. Conservative treatment combined with close and dynamic neurological function monitoring may be feasible for patients with mild or nonprogressive symptoms even spontaneous recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病肾病(DN)是糖尿病患者最重要的合并症之一。这是导致终末期肾病的主要因素。肝素类似物可以延缓DN的进展,但机制还不完全清楚。在这项研究中,我们发现,通过对小鼠肾脏蛋白质组的无标记定量,低分子量肝素(LMWH)治疗显著上调过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)信号通路的一些下游蛋白.通过细胞模型验证,LMWH可以保护肾小管上皮细胞的硫酸乙酰肝素(HS)不被高糖环境中高表达的乙酰肝素酶降解,增强脂肪酸结合蛋白1(FABP1)的内吞募集,PPAR途径的共激活因子,然后调控细胞内PPAR的激活水平。此外,我们首次阐明了HS与FABP1相互作用的分子机制。这些发现为了解肝素在DN发病机制中的作用以及开发相应的治疗方法提供了新的见解。
    Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is one of the most important comorbidities for diabetic patients, which is the main factor leading to end-stage renal disease. Heparin analogs can delay the progression of DN, but the mechanism is not fully understood. In this study, we found that low molecular weight heparin therapy significantly upregulated some downstream proteins of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway by label-free quantification of the mouse kidney proteome. Through cell model verification, low molecular weight heparin can protect the heparan sulfate of renal tubular epithelial cells from being degraded by heparanase that is highly expressed in a high-glucose environment, enhance the endocytic recruitment of fatty acid-binding protein 1, a coactivator of the PPAR pathway, and then regulate the activation level of intracellular PPAR. In addition, we have elucidated for the first time the molecular mechanism of heparan sulfate and fatty acid-binding protein 1 interaction. These findings provide new insights into understanding the role of heparin in the pathogenesis of DN and developing corresponding treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:静脉血栓栓塞是产后最严重的并发症之一,国际社会有各种预防血栓的指南。这项研究将美国妇产科学院(ACOG)和皇家妇产科学院(RCOG)的产后静脉血栓预防建议与现实生活中的临床实践进行了比较。
    方法:在三级护理中心对1000名产后妇女进行数据分析,重点是患者的人口统计学,静脉血栓栓塞危险因素,和临床血栓预防实践。在ACOG和RCOG指南之间比较了患者特定的危险因素,评估低分子量肝素的剂量和持续时间。遵守准则,治疗不足/过度治疗率,和所需数量的预充式低分子量肝素注射器进行了评估。
    结果:在ACOG和RCOG指南之间观察到显著差异,特别是在低分子量肝素的剂量和持续时间。临床方法的共识率约为53%,不一致倾向于治疗不足(RCOG)和治疗过度(ACOG)。根据ACOG,与RCOG指南相比,所需的预填充低分子量肝素注射器的数量明显更高。
    结论:美国妇产科学院和皇家妇产科学院的产后静脉血栓栓塞预防指南显示出实质性差异,导致临床实践的变化。进一步研究静脉血栓栓塞危险因素的意义对于改进风险评估工具和完善妊娠相关静脉血栓栓塞预防的指南建议至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Venous thromboembolism is one of the most serious complications of the postpartum period, and international societies have various thromboprophylaxis guidelines for its prevention. This study compares postpartum venous thromboprophylaxis recommendations from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) with real-life clinical practices.
    METHODS: Data analysis of 1000 postpartum women at a tertiary care center focused on patient demographics, venous thromboembolism risk factors, and clinical thromboprophylaxis practices. Patient-specific risk factors were compared between ACOG and RCOG guidelines, assessing Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin dosages and durations. Guideline compliance, undertreatment/overtreatment rates, and the required number of prefilled Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin syringes were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Significant discrepancies were observed between ACOG and RCOG guidelines, particularly in Low Molecular Weight Heparin dosages and durations. Consensus rates with clinical approaches were around 53%, with inconsistencies leaning towards undertreatment (RCOG) and overtreatment (ACOG). The number of required prefilled Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin syringes was notably higher according to RCOG compared to ACOG guidelines.
    CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines from American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists exhibit substantial differences, leading to variations in clinical practice. Further research on the significance of Venous thromboembolism risk factors is essential for improving risk assessment tools and refining guideline recommendations for pregnancy-related Venous thromboembolism prevention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前在急性PE患者中,DOAC之前LMWH导入的持续时间有三种策略:一种是至少5天,另一个是至少3天,最后一个是不到3天。哪个是最好的还不清楚。
    方法:我们将非高危PE患者分为短LMWH(LMWH<3天),中级LMWH(LMWH3-5天),和长LMWH(LMWH>5天)组,通过使用倾向评分匹配,以1:1:2的比例。主要结局是死亡率的复合,包括全因死亡率和PE相关死亡率。VTE复发,大出血,以及他们中的每一个,在PE诊断后3个月。
    结果:短LMWH组(N=504)的3个月复合主要结局较高(129[25.6%]vs67[13.3%],P<0.001),全因死亡率(112[22.2%]vs39[7.7%],P<0.001),和PE相关死亡率(48[9.5%]vs17[3.4%],P<0.001),比中间-LMWH基团(N=504)。短LMWH组的3个月复合主要结局也较高(129[25.6%]vs151[15.0%],P<0.001),全因死亡率(112[22.2%]vs90[8.9%],P<0.001),与PE相关的死亡率(48[9.5%]vs41[4.1%],P<0.001)比长LMWH组(N=1008)。短LMWH组和中间LMWH组的VTE复发率和大出血率相似,以及短LMWH和长LMWH组之间。中间LMWH组和长LMWH组具有相似的3个月主要结局率。
    结论:对于非高危急性PE患者,在切换到DOAC之前,初始LMWH导入的最佳持续时间可以是3~5天.
    BACKGROUND: There are currently three strategies for the duration of LMWH lead-in before DOACs in patients with acute PE: one is at least 5 days, the other is at least 3 days, and the last one is less than 3 days. Which one is the best is yet unknown.
    METHODS: We divided non-high-risk PE patients into short-LMWH (LMWH <3 days), intermediate-LMWH (LMWH 3-5 days), and long-LMWH (LMWH >5 days) groups, in a 1:1:2 ratio by using propensity score matching. Primary outcomes were a composite of mortality including all-cause and PE-related mortality, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding, as well as each one of them, at 3-month after PE diagnosis.
    RESULTS: The short-LMWH group (N = 504) had higher 3-month composite primary outcome (129 [25.6%] vs 67 [13.3%], P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (112 [22.2%] vs 39 [7.7%], P < 0.001), and PE-related mortality (48 [9.5%] vs 17 [3.4%], P < 0.001), than the intermediate-LMWH group (N = 504). The short-LMWH group also had higher 3-month composite primary outcome (129 [25.6%] vs 151 [15.0%], P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (112 [22.2%] vs 90 [8.9%], P < 0.001), and PE-related mortality (48 [9.5%] vs 41 [4.1%], P < 0.001) than the long-LMWH group (N = 1008). The VTE recurrence and major bleeding rates were similar between the short-LMWH and intermediate-LMWH groups, and between the short-LMWH and long-LMWH groups. The intermediate-LMWH and long-LMWH groups had similar 3-month primary outcomes rates in whole or in part with each other.
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with non-high-risk acute PE, the optimal duration of initial LMWH lead-in before switching to DOACs could be 3 to 5 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较利伐沙班与依诺肝素在诊断为癌症和静脉血栓栓塞的患者中的有效性。
    方法:搜索PubMed,Scopus,和谷歌学者,从成立到2023年4月进行。纳入了利伐沙班和依诺肝素在癌症和VTE/PE/DVT患者中的比较文章。审查管理器5.2版用于分析以下结果;VTE,PE,DVT,大出血,和死亡率。
    结果:共8篇,2276例患者纳入最终分析。汇总分析显示,利伐沙班与VTE发生的相关性无统计学意义(RR:0.83,95%CI:0.58-1.18,P:0.3),而大出血的减少则无统计学意义(RR:0.79,95%CI:0.53-1.18,P:0.25)。分析表明,与依诺肝素相比,利伐沙班的死亡率没有显着降低(RR:0.74,95%CI:0.46-1.20,P:0.23)。
    结论:利伐沙班可以替代依诺肝素,没有明显的缺点,用于预防和管理恶性肿瘤患者的VTE。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to enoxaparin in patients diagnosed with cancer and venous thromboembolism.
    METHODS: A search of Pub Med, Scopus, and Google Scholar, from inception through April 2023 was conducted. Articles comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin in patients with cancer and VTE/PE/DVT were included. Review Manager Version 5.2 was utilised for the analysis of the following outcomes; VTE, PE, DVT, major bleeding, and mortality.
    RESULTS: A total of 8 articles and 2276 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled analysis showed that rivaroxaban had a statistically insignificant reduced association with VTE occurrence (RR:0.83, 95% CI:0.58-1.18, P:0.3) as well as a statically insignificant reduction in major bleeding (RR:0.79, 95% CI:0.53-1.18, P:0.25). Analysis showcased that there was an insignificant reduction of mortality rivaroxaban as compared to enoxaparin (RR:0.74, 95% CI: 0.46-1.20, P:0.23).
    CONCLUSIONS: Rivaroxaban can serve as a viable alternative to enoxaparin, with no appreciable drawbacks, for preventing and managing VTE in patients with malignancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号