■与第一代表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)定向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂相比,奥希替尼更有效且安全。然而,对于发展中国家的大多数患者来说,奥希替尼并不能负担得起。此外,奥希替尼的最小生物学有效剂量可能小于批准剂量.
■这是一项回顾性观察性的多中心研究,旨在描述疗效(客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),无进展生存期(PFS),EGFR突变的非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期(OS))和毒性。
■在2021年1月至2023年8月之间,我们招募了22名患者。六人每周一次接受奥希替尼80mg,9人接受了80mg每3天一次的治疗,7人隔日接受了80mg的治疗.响应包括0个完整响应,7(31.8%)部分响应,9例(40.9%)病情稳定,5例(22.7%)病情进展。ORR为31.8%,DCR为72.7%。PFS中位数为9.2个月(95%置信区间(CI)2.9-15.7),中位OS为17.8个月(95%CI,3.2-32.6)。在二线及以上接受奥希替尼频率降低的患者中,ORR为29.4%,DCR为70.5%,中位PFS为5.9个月(95%CI,1.1-10.6),中位OS为17.6个月(95%CI,2.9-32.2).在8例(36.3%)患者中发现了3级和更高的毒性。
■减少奥希替尼的给药频率可能是一种有效的治疗选择,尤其是在无法负担每日全剂量奥希替尼的患者的二线及以上设置中.这可以提供具有与标准剂量奥希替尼相似的毒性特征的额外治疗选择。
UNASSIGNED: Osimertinib is more efficacious and as safe as first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, osimertinib is not affordable for most patients in developing nations. Moreover, the minimum biologically effective dose of osimertinib may be less than the approved dose.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective observational multicentric study aimed to describe the efficacy (objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)) and toxicity of osimertinib 80 mg orally administered less frequently than daily (ranging from every other day to once-a-week) in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Between January 2021 and August 2023, we enrolled 22 patients. Six received osimertinib 80 mg once-a-week, nine received 80 mg once-in-3-days and seven received 80 mg on alternate days. Responses included 0 complete responses, 7 (31.8%) partial responses, 9 (40.9%) stable disease and 5 (22.7%) progressive disease. ORR was 31.8%, and DCR was 72.7%. Median PFS was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-15.7), and median OS was 17.8 months (95% CI, 3.2-32.6). In patients who received reduced frequency osimertinib in the second line and beyond, the ORR was 29.4%, DCR was 70.5%, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1.1-10.6) and median OS was 17.6 months (95% CI, 2.9-32.2). Grade 3 and higher toxicities were noted in 8 (36.3%) patients.
UNASSIGNED: Less frequent dosing of osimertinib may be a valid treatment option, especially in the second line and beyond setting in patients who cannot afford full dose daily osimertinib. This may provide an additional treatment option with a similar toxicity profile as that of standard dose osimertinib.