local anaesthetics

局部麻醉药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在各种组合中适当使用局部麻醉药物的混合物用于神经阻滞方面没有共识。我们打算比较短效利多卡因和长效罗哌卡因的混合物与未稀释的序贯注射,以观察超声引导(USG)锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞在上肢手术中的阻滞特征。
    对64名进行上肢手术的成年患者进行了一项双盲随机研究,这些患者分别接受了15mL2%利多卡因与肾上腺素和0.75%罗哌卡因作为1:1的混合物在混合组(M组)中使用USG技术或在顺序组(S组)中连续注射。主要结果是在阻滞注射后10分钟内完成四次神经感觉阻滞的参与者的百分比。次要结果是直到30分钟的感觉和运动阻滞特征,镇痛的总持续时间,感觉和运动阻滞,和并发症。
    人口统计特征和手术时间相似。在10分钟时完全四神经感觉阻滞的参与者百分比在S组(69%)高于M组(41%)(P=0.04)。在30分钟时完全感觉和运动阻滞率相似。块程序时间,镇痛的总持续时间,两组的感觉和运动阻滞相似。无重大并发症。
    利多卡因-罗哌卡因,与混合注射技术相比,感觉和运动阻滞的初始发生率较高,总阻滞持续时间相似。
    UNASSIGNED: There is no consensus on the appropriate use of mixtures of local anaesthetic drugs in various combinations for nerve blocks. We intended to compare short-acting lignocaine and long-acting ropivacaine as a mixture versus undiluted sequential injections on block characteristics of ultrasound-guided (USG) supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: A double-blinded randomised study was conducted on 64 adult patients scheduled for upper limb surgery who received 15 mL each of 2% lignocaine with adrenaline and 0.75% ropivacaine as a 1:1 mixture in the mixed group (Group M) or sequential injections in the sequential group (Group S) by using a USG technique. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with complete four nerve sensory blocks at 10 minutes post block injection. Secondary outcomes were sensory and motor block characteristics till 30 minutes, total duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block, and complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Demographic characteristics and time taken for the procedure were similar. The percentage of participants with a complete four-nerve sensory block at 10 minutes was higher in Group S (69%) versus Group M (41%) (P = 0.04). Complete sensory and motor block rates were similar at 30 minutes. The block procedure time, total duration of analgesia, and sensory and motor block were similar in both groups. There were no major complications.
    UNASSIGNED: Sequential lignocaine-ropivacaine, compared to the mixed injection technique, has a higher initial rate of sensory and motor block onset with a similar total block duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部麻醉剂(LA)可能对大鼠产生有害影响,牛,犬和人类肌腱组织和细胞。目前,目前尚无关于这些药物对马肌腱细胞影响的可用数据.即使用于管理马疼痛肌腱状况的LA注射是有限的,它通常通过关节内使用,滑膜内,神经周,鞘内以及跛行检查。在这项体外研究中,LA的细胞毒性作用,包括利多卡因,甲哌卡因,和布比卡因对马肌腱细胞的作用,在存在和不存在富血小板血浆(PRP)的情况下,被调查了。PRP可加速组织愈合,并对暴露于不同应激条件的不同细胞类型发挥细胞保护作用,包括毒品。结果表明,暴露于LA以剂量和时间依赖性方式显着降低了肌腱细胞的活力,而PRP能够抵消其细胞毒性作用。此外,显微镜和流式细胞术分析显示暴露于这些药物的马肌腱细胞凋亡和坏死,当PRP在培养基中时,两者都减少了。这些发现强调了考虑鞘内和耳内注射LA相关的肌腱细胞毒性的重要性。因为它们可能会影响肌腱细胞或降低相关疗法的疗效。此外,这项研究还强调了PRP的保护作用,这可以让洛杉矶注射更安全。
    Local anaesthetics (LAs) can have detrimental effects on rat, bovine, canine, and human tendon tissues and cells. Currently, there has been no available data on the impact of these drugs on equine tenocytes. Even if LA injection for managing painful tendon conditions in horses is limited, it is usually used via intra-articular, intrasynovial, perineural, and intrathecal as well as for lameness examinations. In this in vitro study, the cytotoxic effects of LAs, including lidocaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine on equine tenocytes, in the presence and absence of platelet rich plasma (PRP), were investigated. PRP accelerates tissue healing and can exert cytoprotective effects on different cell types exposed to different stressful conditions, including drugs. Results indicated that the exposure to LAs significantly reduced tenocytes viability in dose- and time-dependent manners while PRP was able to counteract their cytotoxic effects. Furthermore, microscopy and flow cytometry analyses revealed apoptosis and necrosis in equine tenocytes exposed to these drugs, that were both reduced when PRP was in the medium. These findings highlight the importance of considering the tenocyte toxicity associated with intrathecal and intraneural LA injections, as they might affect tenocytes or reduce the efficacy of associated therapies. Moreover, this study also highlights the protective effects of PRP, which could make LA injections safer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部麻醉药因其镇痛和麻醉特性在围手术期被广泛使用,包括切除恶性肿瘤的外科手术。同时,化疗药物仍然是癌症治疗的基石,靶向快速分裂的癌细胞以抑制肿瘤生长。这两种药物之间的潜在相互作用引起了越来越多的关注,并且在肿瘤外科背景下可以考虑它们的联合使用。这篇综述探讨了关于局部麻醉药和化疗药物之间相互作用的现有证据。包括生物学机制和临床意义。
    根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目对电子数据库进行系统检索。选择标准被设计为在体外捕获,在体内,和临床研究评估局部麻醉剂和多种化疗药物之间的相互作用。筛选和数据提取由两名评审员独立进行。由于纳入研究的预期异质性,因此使用叙事方法对数据进行了综合。
    初步搜索产生了1225篇相关文章进行筛选,其中43人符合纳入标准。局部麻醉剂和化疗药物之间的相互作用是多方面的。体外研究经常表明,当这些药物联合使用时,细胞毒性谱发生了变化。与变化取决于具体的药物组合和癌细胞类型。机械上,一些相互作用归因于外排泵活性的改变,肿瘤抑制基因表达,或与肿瘤促进相关的细胞信号传导途径的改变。绝大多数体外研究报告了局部麻醉剂在增强化学治疗剂的抗肿瘤活性方面的潜在有益作用。在动物模型中,局部麻醉剂和化疗药物的联合给药对肿瘤生长显示出很大的有益作用,转移,和总体生存率。值得注意的是,目前尚未有任何临床研究报道局部麻醉药和化疗对癌症结局的可能相互作用.
    据报道,局部麻醉药和化学治疗剂之间的临床前相互作用是复杂的,并且包括一系列影响,虽然不是统一的,添加剂或协同。由于缺乏前瞻性试验,这些相互作用的临床意义仍不清楚。尽管如此,局部麻醉剂对化疗效果的调节值得在癌症手术中进行进一步的临床研究,在这些手术中它们可以一起使用。
    开放科学框架(OSF,项目链接:https://osf.io/r2u4z)。
    UNASSIGNED: Local anaesthetics are widely used for their analgesic and anaesthetic properties in the perioperative setting, including surgical procedures to excise malignant tumours. Simultaneously, chemotherapeutic agents remain a cornerstone of cancer treatment, targeting rapidly dividing cancer cells to inhibit tumour growth. The potential interactions between these two drug classes have drawn increasing attention and there are oncological surgical contexts where their combined use could be considered. This review examines existing evidence regarding the interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents, including biological mechanisms and clinical implications.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search of electronic databases was performed as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Selection criteria were designed to capture in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies assessing interactions between local anaesthetics and a wide variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The data were synthesised using a narrative approach because of the anticipated heterogeneity of included studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Initial searches yielded 1225 relevant articles for screening, of which 43 met the inclusion criteria. The interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents were diverse and multifaceted. In vitro studies frequently demonstrated altered cytotoxicity profiles when these agents were combined, with variations depending on the specific drug combination and cancer cell type. Mechanistically, some interactions were attributed to modifications in efflux pump activity, tumour suppressor gene expression, or alterations in cellular signalling pathways associated with tumour promotion. A large majority of in vitro studies report potentially beneficial effects of local anaesthetics in terms of enhancing the antineoplastic activity of chemotherapeutic agents. In animal models, the combined administration of local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents showed largely beneficial effects on tumour growth, metastasis, and overall survival. Notably, no clinical study examining the possible interactions of local anaesthetics and chemotherapy on cancer outcomes has been reported.
    UNASSIGNED: Reported preclinical interactions between local anaesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents are complex and encompass a spectrum of effects which are largely, although not uniformly, additive or synergistic. The clinical implications of these interactions remain unclear because of the lack of prospective trials. Nonetheless, the modulation of chemotherapy effects by local anaesthetics warrants further clinical investigation in the context of cancer surgery where they could be used together.
    UNASSIGNED: Open Science Framework (OSF, project link: https://osf.io/r2u4z).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:脊髓麻醉失败导致手术时间延长,手术镇痛不足,需要重复脊髓麻醉,这反过来又导致局部麻醉毒性,高脊柱和全脊柱,转换为全身麻醉。然而,在阿姆哈拉地区州立综合专科医院,这个问题仍未得到探索。
    目的:确定在选定的阿姆哈拉国家区域州立综合专科医院接受手术的患者中,脊柱麻醉失败的发生率和相关因素,埃塞俄比亚西北部,2023年。
    方法:进行多中心前瞻性观察研究。使用问卷和检查表收集数据。所有连续计划的急诊和择期患者均纳入研究。将数据从Epi数据转换为SPSS并进行逻辑回归分析。粗比值比和调整后比值比都用于评估关联强度。具有小于0.05的p值的变量被认为是统计学上显著的。
    结果:本研究共纳入532例患者,有效率为98%。脊髓麻醉失败的发生率为22.4%(CI=19-25.9)。急诊手术(AOR=7.01,CI=4.5-12.7),布比卡因的剂量≤10mg(AOR=3.02,CI=1.3-10.2),麻醉师工作经验<2年(AOR=3.1,CI=1.7-5.72),血脑脊液(AOR=8.5,CI=2.53-18.5),高压局部麻醉药物(AOR=3.3,95%CI=3.2-8.2)和无佐剂的局部麻醉师(AOR=5.25,CI=2.62-14.2)与脊髓麻醉失败相关.
    结论:阿姆哈拉地区综合性专科医院的脊髓麻醉失败发生率较高。我们建议麻醉提供者应通过使用佐剂和适当剂量的局部麻醉剂来最大程度地减少失败。此外,应对麻醉学员进行模拟训练,以提高他们的技能并培养合格的专业人员。
    BACKGROUND: Failed spinal anaesthesia causes prolonging of operation time, insufficient analgesia for surgery and needs repeating spinal anaesthesia which in turn causes local anaesthesia toxicity, high spinal and total spinal, and conversion to general anaesthesia. However, the problem remains unexplored in Amhara regional state comprehensive specialized hospitals.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence and factors associated with failed spinal anaesthesia among patients undergoing surgery in selected Amhara National Regional State comprehensive specialized hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2023.
    METHODS: Multi-center prospective observational study was conducted. Data was collected using questionnaire and checklist. All consecutive scheduled emergency and elective patients were included in the study. Data was transformed from Epi data to SPSS and logistic regression analysis was done. Both crude and adjusted odds ratio were used to assess the strength of association. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.
    RESULTS: A total of 532 patients were included in this study with a response rate of 98%. Incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia was 22.4% (CI = 19-25.9). Emergency surgery (AOR = 7.01, CI = 4.5-12.7), dose of bupivacaine of ≤ 10 mg (AOR = 3.02, CI = 1.3-10.2), work experience of anaesthetist < 2 years (AOR = 3.1, CI = 1.7-5.72), bloody CSF (AOR = 8.5, CI = 2.53-18.5), hyperbaric local anaesthetic drug (AOR = 3.3, 95% CI = 3.2-8.2) and local anaesthetist without adjuvants (AOR = 5.25, CI = 2.62-14.2) were associated failed spinal anaesthesia.
    CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia was high in Amhara Region comprehensive specialized hospitals. We suggest that anaesthesia providers should minimize failure by using adjuvants and appropriate dose of local anaesthetic. Additionally, simulation training should be given for anaesthesia trainees to improve their skills and to produce competent professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经元电化学信号涉及钠离子通过位于神经外膜中的电压门控钠通道(NaV)的流动。在九种钠通道亚型中,NaV-1.7、1.8和1.9主要位于伤害感受器上,使他们成为控制疼痛的首要目标。这篇评论强调了一些针对NaV通道活动的最新发现,包括:(1)带电的局部麻醉剂衍生物;(2)NaV通道毒素和相关的小肽阻断剂;(3)调节NaV通道辅助蛋白;(4)NaV通道功能的遗传操作。虽然将临床前发现转化为人类的可行治疗仍然是一个挑战,对NaV通道生理学的更深入了解可能导致开发旨在缓解慢性疼痛的新疗法。
    Neuronal electrochemical signals involve the flux of sodium ions through voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV) located in the neurolemma. Of the nine sodium channel subtypes, NaV-1.7, 1.8, and 1.9 are predominantly located on nociceptors, making them prime targets to control pain. This review highlights some of the latest discoveries targeting NaV channel activity, including: (1) charged local anaesthetic derivatives; (2) NaV channel toxins and associated small peptide blockers; (3) regulation of NaV channel accessory proteins; and (4) genetic manipulation of NaV channel function. While the translation of preclinical findings to a viable treatment in humans has remained a challenge, a greater understanding of NaV channel physiology could lead to the development of a new stream of therapies aimed at alleviating chronic pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用局部麻醉药(LA)通常与很少的不良反应有关,但局部麻醉系统毒性(LAST)可导致严重伤害甚至死亡。然而,从业人员对这种风险的认识很少研究。
    这是一个封闭的,在瑞士的两家大学医院进行的基于网络的研究使用全自动问卷。主要目的是评估各种医生的LAST意识和LA使用情况。次要目标是确定这些医生是否认为应该开发一种旨在计算最大安全LA剂量的工具。
    总体参与率为40.2%,麻醉医师的参与率更高(154/249,61.8%vs159/530,30.0%;P<.001)。麻醉师发现LAST的风险,与非麻醉师相比,系统涉及的风险更高(85.1%vs43.4%,P<.001)。经过多年的临床经验调整后,年龄,国家的文凭,洛杉矶使用的频率,临床位置和麻醉师,唯一显著的关联是后一个因素(P<.001)和临床职位(研究员P=.016,顾问P=.046,分别)。大多数受访者支持开发用于计算最大安全LA剂量的工具(251/313,80.2%),尤其是移动应用程序(190/251,75.7%)。
    在定期使用LAs的从业者中,最后的意识是有限的。应该建立教育干预措施,以及旨在帮助计算最大安全LA剂量的工具。不安全LA剂量给药的实际频率也值得进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of local anaesthetics (LAs) is usually associated with few adverse effects, but local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) can result in serious harm and even death. However, practitioner awareness regarding this risk has been little studied.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a closed, web-based study carried out at two Swiss university hospitals using a fully automated questionnaire. The main objective was to evaluate LAST awareness and LA use among various medical practitioners. The secondary objective was to determine whether these physicians felt that a tool designed to compute maximum safe LA doses should be developed.
    UNASSIGNED: The overall participation rate was 40.2 % and was higher among anaesthesiologists (154/249, 61.8 % vs 159/530, 30.0 %; P < .001). Anaesthesiologists identified the risk of LAST and the systems involved more frequently than non-anaesthesiologists (85.1 % vs 43.4 %, P < .001). After adjusting for years of clinical experience, age, country of diploma, frequency of LA use, clinical position and being an anaesthesiologist, the only significant associations were this latter factor (P < .001) and clinical position (P = .016 for fellows and P = .046 for consultants, respectively). Most respondents supported the development of a tool designed to compute maximum safe LA doses (251/313, 80.2 %) and particularly of a mobile app (190/251, 75.7 %).
    UNASSIGNED: LAST awareness is limited among practitioners who use LAs on a regular basis. Educational interventions should be created, and tools designed to help calculate maximum safe LA doses developed. The actual frequency of unsafe LA doses administration would also deserve further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在探讨瑞士儿科牙医在使用阿替卡因及其他局部和局部麻醉方面的偏好和经验。
    方法:进行了18个问题的调查,试点,并分发给瑞士儿科牙科协会的成员(n=460)。收集了以下信息:不同年龄段使用最多的局部麻醉药,注射一个完整的安瓿所需的时间,观察到的局部和全身副作用的频率,注射前局部麻醉的应用,在应用和注射之间等待的时间,以及局部麻醉的有效性。使用逻辑回归分析牙医的反应,报告比值比(OR)和5%的95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:在发送的460份问卷中,答复率为37%(n=168),响应者主要是女性(67%)和平均47岁。在所有年龄组中,超过80%的牙医使用阿替卡因。45%的反应者注射完整的安瓿需要超过60秒的时间。分别有82%和28%的受访者观察到局部和全身副作用,尽管由于问卷的匿名性,这些问卷的性质和意义没有详细说明。年龄较大的儿童(p=0.04)和经验较多的牙医(p=0.01)的局部不良反应明显较少。大多数响应者使用局部麻醉剂,其中一半在注射前等待了60秒以上。
    结论:阿替卡因是瑞士儿科牙医研究小组广泛使用的局部麻醉药,无论患者年龄如何。注射前使用局部麻醉剂是具有良好感知效果的常见做法。
    OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to explore the preference and experience of paediatric dentists based in Switzerland regarding the use of articaine and other local and topical anaesthesia.
    METHODS: An 18-question survey was developed, piloted, and distributed to the members of the Swiss association of paediatric dentistry (n = 460). The following information were collected: most used local anaesthetic in different age groups, time needed to inject a full ampule, frequency of observed local and systemic side effects, application of topical anaesthetic prior to injection, time waited between application and the injection, and perceived effectiveness of topical anaesthetic. The dentists\' responses were analysed with logistic regressions reporting odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) at 5%.
    RESULTS: The response rate was 37% (n = 168) out of the 460 questionnaires sent, with the responders being predominantly female (67%) and 47-year-old on average. More than 80% of the dentists used articaine in all age groups. 45% of responders took longer than 60 s to inject a full ampule. Local and systemic side-effects were observed by 82% and 28% of respondents respectively, although the nature and the significance of those were not detailed due to the anonymous nature of the questionnaire. Significantly less local adverse effects were seen for older children (p = 0.04) and among dentists with more years of experience (p = 0.01). Most responders applied topical anaesthetic and half of them waited longer than 60 s before injection.
    CONCLUSIONS: Articaine is a widely used local anaesthetic by the studied group of Swiss paediatric dentists regardless of patient\'s age. The use of topical anaesthetic before injection is a common practice with good perceived effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着SARS-CoV-2疫苗接种工作在许多国家取得进展,对于那些患有严重疾病的人,仍然迫切需要有效的抗病毒治疗策略,最近,已经做出了相当大的努力来重新利用现有药物作为抗病毒药物。在过去的几十年中,已经研究了局部麻醉剂普鲁卡因对几种病毒的抗病毒特性。这里,我们提供了普鲁卡因前药ProcCluster®和盐酸普鲁卡因对SARS-CoV-2感染的体外抑制作用的数据。两种普鲁卡因前药均限制SARS-CoV-2子代病毒滴度,并以与病毒载量成比例的方式降低干扰素和细胞因子反应。在细胞培养中SARS-CoV-2复制周期的早期阶段添加普鲁卡因首先限制了亚基因组RNA转录本的产生,然后影响病毒基因组RNA的复制。有趣的是,普鲁卡因在复制周期后期添加时,还对SARS-CoV-2子代病毒释放产生显著影响,当病毒RNA生产和蛋白质生产已经基本完成时。
    As vaccination efforts against SARS-CoV-2 progress in many countries, there is still an urgent need for efficient antiviral treatment strategies for those with severer disease courses, and lately, considerable efforts have been undertaken to repurpose existing drugs as antivirals. The local anaesthetic procaine has been investigated for antiviral properties against several viruses over the past decades. Here, we present data on the inhibitory effect of the procaine prodrugs ProcCluster® and procaine hydrochloride on SARS-CoV-2 infection in vitro. Both procaine prodrugs limit SARS-CoV-2 progeny virus titres as well as reduce interferon and cytokine responses in a proportional manner to the virus load. The addition of procaine during the early stages of the SARS-CoV-2 replication cycle in a cell culture first limits the production of subgenomic RNA transcripts, and later affects the replication of the viral genomic RNA. Interestingly, procaine additionally exerts a prominent effect on SARS-CoV-2 progeny virus release when added late during the replication cycle, when viral RNA production and protein production are already largely completed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在比较利多卡因血肿阻滞术(HB)与罗哌卡因HB术中的疗效,并比较不同时机罗哌卡因HB在控制长骨骨折接骨术犬术后疼痛中的疗效。
    方法:我们进行了随机,失明,前瞻性临床研究。
    方法:纳入48只长骨骨折犬,随机分为四组:利多卡因(L),罗哌卡因(Rmid),罗哌卡因前(Rpre)和罗哌卡因后(Rpost)组。
    方法:L组(n=14)和Rmid组(n=11)的狗接受利多卡因或罗哌卡因HB,分别,骨折复位后和接骨术材料放置前。Rpre犬(n=11)在骨折复位前接受罗哌卡因HB,和Rpost犬(n=12)在骨接合材料放置后接受罗哌卡因HB。使用墨尔本大学疼痛量表(UMPS)和algometer进行了八次术后疼痛评估。根据UMPS评分进行抢救镇痛。对于数据分析,夏皮罗-威尔克正态检验,卡方,使用学生t检验和拆分图分析。显著性水平设定为α=0.05。
    结果:对L组中的一只狗进行抢救镇痛,一个在Rmid组中,一个在Rpost组中,没有检测到显著差异。与Rmid组相比,L组犬表现出明显较高的平均机械性疼痛阈值(p=0.049)和较低的平均UMPS评分(p=0.001)。与Rmid组相比,Rpost组狗具有统计学上显著更高的平均疼痛阈值(p=0.009)。
    结论:在骨折复位后和骨接合材料置入前进行时,利多卡因HB似乎比罗哌卡因HB更有效地控制了接受长骨骨折接骨术的狗的术后疼痛。在接受长骨骨折骨合成的狗中,骨合成材料放置后给予罗哌卡因HB似乎比骨折复位后和骨合成材料放置前给予或骨折复位前给予更有效。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-operative lidocaine hematoma block (HB) to ropivacaine HB and to compare the efficacy of different timings of ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing the osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures.
    METHODS: We conducted a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical study.
    METHODS: Forty-eight dogs with long-bone fractures were included and were randomly allocated to four groups: lidocaine (L), ropivacaine (Rmid), ropivacaine pre- (Rpre) and ropivacaine post- (Rpost) groups.
    METHODS: The dogs in group L (n = 14) and in group Rmid (n = 11) received a lidocaine or ropivacaine HB, respectively, after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement. Rpre dogs (n = 11) received ropivacaine HB before fracture reduction, and Rpost dogs (n = 12) received ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement. Eight post-operative pain assessments were performed using the University of Melbourne Pain Scale (UMPS) and an algometer. Rescue analgesia was administered based on UMPS scoring. For data analysis, the Shapiro-Wilk test of normality, chi-square, Student t test and Split Plot analysis were used. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05.
    RESULTS: Rescue analgesia was administered to one dog in group L, one in group Rmid and one in group Rpost, with no significant differences detected. Compared to group Rmid, group L dogs exhibited significantly higher mean mechanical pain thresholds (p = 0.049) and lower mean UMPS scores (p = 0.001). Group Rpost dogs had statistically significantly higher mean pain thresholds compared to group Rmid (p = 0.009).
    CONCLUSIONS: When performed after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement, lidocaine HB seems to be more effective than ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. The administration of ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement seems to be more effective than administration after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement or administration before fracture reduction in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号