UNASSIGNED: To investigate the pathogenesis of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma (PACG) and its relationship with the anatomical structure of the anterior segment by obtaining biometric parameters using the IOL-Master 700.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective case-control study was conducted. Clinical data from 39 PACG patients and 40 normal controls treated at the Aier Eye Hospital affiliated with Wuhan University from January to December 2022 were collected. Anterior chamber depth (AC), white-to-white (WTW), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K1), corneal curvature (K2), and lens position (LP) were measured using the IOL-Master 700 to analyze the characteristics and differences in the anterior segment structure of both groups. Statistical methods included independent sample t-tests and logistic regression analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were found in the anterior segment biometric parameters between PACG patients and normal controls (p < 0.05). Anterior chamber depth, white-to-white, lens thickness, central corneal thickness, axial length, and K2 were all related to the occurrence of PACG (p < 0.05). The occurrence of PACG was negatively correlated with ACD, CCT, and AL (OR = 0.12-0.64, p < 0.05), and positively correlated with LT.
UNASSIGNED: Compared to the normal control group, PACG patients in the Hubei region have a smaller anterior segment space, narrower angles, thicker lens, thinner cornea, shorter axial length, flatter cornea, and more anteriorly positioned lens.

UNASSIGNED: We examined differences in the accuracy of three intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas: the traditional Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff/Theoretical (SRK/T) formula; the Barrett Universal II (BU II) formula, which is a new-generation IOL calculation formula; and the postoperative spherical equivalent prediction using artificial intelligence and linear algorithms developed by Debellemanière, Gatinel, and Saad formula (PEARL-DGS [PEARL]) formula, and evaluated factors that cause postoperative refractive error (PE).
UNASSIGNED: The study included 205 patients (205 eyes) with a mean age of 75.2 ± 8.7 years who underwent cataract surgery at our institution from December 2018 to October 2023. The PE of the three IOL calculation formulas was calculated and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed with a PE higher than ±0.50 D as the dependent variable, and age, sex, axial length (AL), mean keratometry (mean K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and white-to-white (WTW) as independent variables.
UNASSIGNED: The mean PE (ME) ± standard deviation of the SRK/T, BU II, and PEARL formulas was 0.11 ± 0.52, 0.11 ± 0.50, and 0.21 ± 0.50 D, respectively. MEs of the three IOL calculation formulas were significantly different from 0 (p < 0.01). The median absolute error (MedAE) was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.83). The percentage of PE within ±0.50 D was not significantly different among the three IOL calculation formulas (p = 0.13). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the significantly associated factors with PE higher than ±0.50 D were AL, ACD, and LT for the SRK/T formula, sex and LT for the BU II formula, and LT for the PEARL formula (all p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: In the BU II and PEARL formulas, AL was excluded as a factor affecting PE, indicating that LT was a risk factor.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the agreement of ocular parameters of patients with myopia measured using Colombo intraocular lens (IOL) 2 and IOLMaster 700.
METHODS: Eighty patients (male, 22; average age, 29.14 ± 7.36 years) with myopia (159 eyes) were included in this study in May 2023. The participants\' axial length (AXL), central corneal thickness (CCT), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white distance (WTW), front flat (K1), steep (K2), mean (Km) corneal keratometry, astigmatism (Astig), J0 vector, and J45 vector were measured using the IOLMaster 700 and Colombo IOL 2. The measurements from both devices were compared using the generalized estimating equation, correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: With the Colombo IOL 2, lower values for K2 and J0 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.587, p = 0.033; OR = 0.779, p < 0.0001, respectively), and larger values for WTW, Astig, and J45 (OR = 1.277, OR = 1.482, OR = 1.1, all p < 0.0001) were obtained. All ocular measurements by both instruments showed positive correlations, with AXL demonstrating the strongest correlation (r = 0.9996, p < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficients for AXL and CCT measured by both instruments was 0.999 and 0.988 (both p < 0.0001), and Bland-Altman plot showed 95% limits of agreement (LoA) of -0.078 to 0.11 mm and - 9.989 to 13.486 μm, respectively. The maximum absolute 95% LoA for LT, WTW, K1, K2, and J0 were relatively high, achieving 0.829 mm, 0.717 mm, 0.983 D, 0.948 D, and 0.632 D, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In young patients with myopia, CCT and AXL measurements obtained with the Colombo IOL 2 and IOLMaster 700 were comparable. However, WTW, LT, corneal refractive power, and astigmatism values could not be used interchangeably in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study is to establish normative values of eye parameters such as lens thickness (LT), lens diameter (LD), and axial length (AXL) among wide age range of Saudis using Pentacam AXL and compare these values between gender, in addition to that, to find the correlation between the age and those parameters.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we measured LT, LD, and AXL in 125 healthy Saudi controls aged between 8 and 60 years using OCULUS Pentacam AXL. The screening tests were performed for each subject to exclude any ocular abnormalities using slit lamp (Haag-Streit BQ 900), refractive error measured using auto refractometer (Topcon KR-1 Autorefractor/Keratometer), and subject who has spherical equivalent more than ± 4.00D and astigmatism more than 1.00DC was excluded from the study. The mean of three readings of LT, LD, and AXL was taken. All examination was applied on one eye (right eye).
RESULTS: The overall mean and standard deviation of LT, LD, and AXL was 2.2 mm ± 0.5, 2.7 mm ± 0.6, and 23.8 mm ± 1.0, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in these parameters in all age groups, except in Group 2 (age: 19-30 years), there was a statistically significant difference between males and females in AXL, mean difference (M = 0.48), and P = 0.015. The mean of LT and LD was negatively associated with age. However, there was no significant correlation between AXL and age.
CONCLUSIONS: Normative values of LT, LD, and AXL have been established in wide age group of healthy Saudis; the findings of the present study can highlight not only the normal range of the different ocular parameters, namely LT, LD, and AXL, but also their variation with age and gender.

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior chamber depth (ACD) and lens thickness (LT) measurements by ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), A-scan cross vector (CV) overlay with UBM, and immersion A-scan technique in pediatric eyes.
METHODS: This prospective comparative cohort study comprised 43 eyes of 25 pediatric participants (mean age: 2.3±2.2 y). UBM and immersion A-scan biometry were performed prior to dilation and intraocular surgery. ACD and LT were measured by UBM image analysis, A-scan CV UBM overlay, and immersion A-scan technique.
RESULTS: ACD and LT measurements obtained using immersion A-scan were significantly greater than with UBM image analysis with mean differences of 0.52 mm and 0.62 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). Immersion A-scan and UBM measurements were moderately correlated (r = 0.70 and 0.64, p < 0.001). ACD and LT measurements obtained using CV overlay were not significantly different than UBM measurements and the values were strongly positively correlated (r = 0.95 and 0.93, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Immersion A-scan may overestimate ACD and LT compared to UBM in pediatric patients due to oblique placement of the A-scan probe relative to the optical axis. Supplemental use of UBM and/or CV overlay is indicated to improve measurement accuracy in pediatric patients who cannot reliably fixate due to the ability to confirm proper alignment of the probe with the pupil by visualizing the anterior segment.

To investigate the influence of lens thickness (LT) on accuracy of Kane, Hill-RBF 3.0 Barrett Universal II (BUII), Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), and Pearl-DGS formulas in eyes with different axial lengths (AL).
The prospective cohort study was conducted at Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University. Patients who had uneventful cataract surgery between March 2021 and July 2023 were recruited. Manifest refraction was conducted two-month post-surgery. Eyes were divided into 4 groups based on AL: short (<22mm), medium (22-24.5 mm), medium long (24.5-26mm) and very long (≥26mm). In each AL group, eyes were then divided into 3 subgroups based on the LT measured with IOLmaster700: thin (<4.5 mm), medium (4.5-5.0 mm), and thick (≥ 5 mm). The influence of LT on accuracy of Kane, Hill-RBF 3.0, BUII, EVO, and Pearl-DGS formulas were investigated in each AL group.
A total of 327 eyes from 327 patients were analyzed, with 64, 102, 73 and 88 eyes in each AL group, respectively. In eyes with AL < 24.5 mm, myopic PE was significantly associated with greater LT using all the 5 formulas (all p < 0.05). Backward stepwise multivariate regression analyses revealed that LT was an important influencing factor for PE in all 5 formulas, particularly in eyes with AL <24.5 mm. In eyes with AL <24.5 mm and LT > 5.0 mm, PE of all 5 formulas calculated with the optional parameter LT were more myopic than those calculated without LT.
Thicker LT was associated with more myopic PE among eyes with AL <24.5 mm when using all 5 formulas. Further optimization of current formulas is necessary, especially for eyes with short AL and thick LT.

UNASSIGNED: Ocular parameters are not only useful for diagnosing diseases but also for guiding treatment approaches. A lot of previous studies have reported ocular parameters and its relations before cataract surgery. However, despite ethnic differences in ocular biometry, few reports have dealt with Japanese. Hence, this retrospective cross-sectional study aimed to measure parameters of preoperative cataract patients and examines the correlations between each parameter in Japanese elderly people.
UNASSIGNED: The 210 subjects had their ocular axial lengths measured with OA-2000. The endpoints were ocular axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), average anterior corneal radius of curvature (CR), white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens thickness (LT). Our analyses utilized the eye with the longer AL in each person. Each parameter was analyzed for correlations in a round-robin manner. Regression analyses were performed on parameters correlated with AL.
UNASSIGNED: The parameters correlated with AL were CR (r = 0.33, P < 0.0001), WTW (r = 0.29, P < 0.0001), ACD (r = 0.59, P < 0.0001), and LT (r = -0.30, P < 0.0001). These parameters related to AL in all simple regression equations (CR (P < 0.0001), WTW (P = 0.0002), ACD (P < 0.0001), LT (P = 0.0001)). In multiple regression analyses, CR, ACD, and LT might relate to AL (CR (P = 0.0002), ACD (P < 0.0001), LT (P = 0.018)). LT tended to be thinner as AL increased, while CR, WTW, and ACD tended to increase.
UNASSIGNED: This information may be useful in developing strategies for ophthalmic surgery, as it provides information on the location of intraocular tissues. Various parameters have been used in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in recent years and knowledge of the interrelationship among parameters may be useful in determining IOL power according to ethnicity in the future.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the associations between central anterior chamber depth (CACD) and other anterior segment biometric parameters and to determine the possible determinants of CACD in short, normal, and long eyes.
METHODS: The biometric data of pre-operation patients aged 50-80 years with coexisting cataract and primary angle-closure disease or senile cataract were reviewed. Axial length (AL), CACD, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white distance (WTW) were measured by Lenstar optical biometry (Lenstar 900). The data of 100 normal eyes (AL = 22 to 26 mm), 100 short eyes (AL ≤ 22 mm), and 100 long eyes (AL ≥ 26 mm) were consecutively collected for subsequent analyses.
RESULTS: The mean age of the subjects was 66.60 ± 7.85 years, with 25.7% of the sample being men. Both CACD and WTW were found to be smallest in short eyes and were smaller in normal eyes than in long eyes (F = 126.524, P < 0.001; F = 28.458, P < 0.001). The mean LT was significantly thicker in short eyes than in normal and long eyes (4.66 mm versus 4.49 mm versus 4.40 mm; F = 18.099, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in CCT between the three AL groups (F = 2.135, P = 0.120). Stepwise regression analysis highlighted AL, LT, and WTW as three independent factors associated with CACD in the normal AL group. In the short AL group and long AL group, LT and WTW were independent factors associated with CACD.
CONCLUSIONS: CACD increases as AL elongates and reaches a peak when AL exceeds 26 mm. Furthermore, CACD showed inverse correlation with LT and positive correlation with WTW. A relatively small WTW results in an anteriorly positioned lens, and thus, a decrease in CACD.

Introduction To compare the prediction accuracy of lens power calculation formulas in patients undergoing mature cataract surgery. Methods A total of 90 operations involving the Alcon SA60AT IOL implant (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland) were analyzed in terms of mean refractive prediction error (PE) and mean absolute prediction error (MAE) using backward calculation in a retrospective design. Results A negative PE was observed in SRK/T, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formulas. In contrast, positive PEs were observed in Barrett Universal II (BAUII), Kane, and Radial Basis Function (RBF) formulas. Negative PE was observed with all formulas, except BAUII, in patients with a shallow anterior chamber depth (ACD). While the SRK/T, Holladay 1, BAU, Kane, and RBF formulas demonstrated positive PE, the Holladay 2, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and EVO formulas indicated negative PE. In patients with deep ACD, positive PE was observed in all formulas, barring Holladay 2 and EVO. No significant differences were identified between the formulas concerning MAE and percentages of 0.25 diopter (D), 0.50 D, 0.75 D, and 1.0 D across all study groups. Conclusion Although the new generation formulas provide very good results, achieving the best with a single formula is still impossible.

OBJECTIVE: Larger-than-planned capsulotomies can occur, yet their association with age and eye parameters remains poorly understood. This study aimed to assess capsulotomy enlargement after femtosecond laser treatment in cataract surgery and to explore a possible correlation of capsulotomy enlargement with age and eye parameters.
METHODS: This retrospective case series included consecutive patients diagnosed with cataracts between 05/2018 and 11/2019. Among them, patients within the age ranges of <18, 18-49, and ≥50 years were assigned to the childhood cataract (CC), young adult cataract (YAC), and age-related cataract (ARC) groups, respectively. The capsulotomy enlargement ratio (CER), age, degree of cataract, lens thickness (LT), axial length, and anterior chamber depth were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 155 participants (179 eyes) were enrolled. The CER was significantly different among the three groups (CC: 1.245 vs. YAC: 1.060 vs. ARC: 1.029, P<0.001). The CER was found to be independently associated with both age (β=-0.011 (0.001), P<0.001) and LT (β=-0.049 (0.017), P=0.006) in the CC group, but it was only independently correlated with age (β=-0.004 (0.001), P=0.002) in the YAC group and LT (β=-0.014 (0.007), P=0.048) in the ARC group.
CONCLUSIONS: Capsulotomy enlargement can occur after femtosecond laser treatment in cataract surgery, especially in the non-adult group. Age was a determinant of the CER in CC and YAC groups, while LT was an independent determinant of the CER in CC and ARC groups. These two factors should be taken into consideration for more precise sized capsulotomy.