BACKGROUND: To report the clinicopathological features and epidemiology of iris melanoma in Queensland, Australia.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 86 patients with iris melanoma treated between 2001 and 2022 at the Queensland Ocular Oncology Service, Brisbane, Australia. Main outcome measures included demographics, clinical and phenotypic features, age-adjusted incidence and relative survival.
RESULTS: Eighty-six patients (63% female) were included. Mean age was 54 years (range 17-82 years). The majority of patients (97%) were Caucasian, with blue eyes, fair skin and Fitzpatrick Skin Type I or II. Demographic features and clinical history showed a tendency for high ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure in the cohort. Histopathology was available in 69 cases (82%), and of these, 77% tumours were of spindle cell origin, with low-risk genetic profiles. Patients were followed for a mean of 8 years (median 7, range 1-21 years) after diagnosis, and only one case of metastasis was documented.
CONCLUSIONS: The association of iris freckles, history of UVR exposure and dermatologic findings supports the role of UVR in iris melanoma. Occupation and avocation history, as well as evaluation of iris freckles may offer an easily accessible way of stratifying the risk of an individual for development of UVR-related uveal melanoma.

The iris is a unique structure, with exquisite variations in colour and form. Pathological changes, specifically including iris cysts and tumours are relatively uncommon, difficult to diagnose, and yet potentially blinding or life-threatening. Based on a comprehensive literature review, with highly illustrated key case examples, this report aims to guide the clinician in filtering the differential diagnoses of iris cysts and tumours. Evaluation is in the context of key diagnostic clinical tools and management considerations. Diagnostic imaging techniques include serial anterior segment photography, ultrasound, anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and iris fluorescein angiography, however, the roles of computerised topography and magnetic resonance imaging are also considered in this review. Management includes categorisation in terms of solid iris tumours (melanocytic vs. non-melanocytic), or iris cysts (primary vs. secondary) that may be usefully differentiated by clinical assessment, avoiding more invasive interventions. Cystic lesions are generally benign, although implantation cysts in particular cause significant complications and surgical challenges. Most solid tumours are melanocytic and also typically benign. However, in larger lesions, rapid growth, symptoms and complications more likely indicate malignancy, requiring further investigation.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has demonstrated high levels of tissue contrast, accuracy and reproducibility in evaluating posterior uveal melanoma. Owing to smaller size, the role of MRI in detecting and characterising iris melanoma has not yet been explored.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a protocol to image iris melanoma and describe the MRI characteristics of histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma.
METHODS: An optimised MRI protocol, using a 3T MRI scanner and a 32-channel head coil, was developed to image iris tumours. A prospective, single-centre, 12-month study was conducted on all patients with lesions suspicious for iris melanoma. All patients were offered an MRI scan in addition to the standardised clinical procedures. Image quality comparison was made with existing clinical investigations. Iris melanoma characteristics on MRI are described.
RESULTS: A successful optimised MRI scan protocol was developed that was able to detect and characterise iris melanoma. One normal participant and five patients with subsequent histopathological-confirmed iris melanoma (n = 6) were recruited. Four patients completed the full MRI sequence. All iris melanoma were detected on at least one T1- or T2-weighted images. When compared to the vitreous, all iris melanomas demonstrated hyper-intensity on T1-weighted images and hypo-intensity on T2-weighted images. On T1-mapping, T1-values of iris melanoma demonstrated an inverse relationship with the degree of tumour pigmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights an optimised, easily reproducible MRI scan protocol to image iris melanoma. Numerous MR imaging characteristics of iris melanoma are reported for the first time and a potential non-invasive tumour biomarker is described.

The purpose of this guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2016 on the appropriate management of patients with uveal melanoma.
In 2021, a multidisciplinary working group from the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services was convened to update the guideline. A comprehensive review of new research evidence in PubMed as well as new clinical practice guidelines from prominent oncology groups informed the update. An enhancement in methodology included adding levels of evidence and strength of recommendations. The updated guideline was circulated to all members of the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team for review and endorsement.
New and modified recommendations address provider training requirements, diagnostic imaging for the detection of metastases, neo-adjuvant pre-enucleation radiotherapy, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for radiation retinopathy, genetic prognostic testing, surveillance following definitive local therapy, and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.
The recommendations represent evidence-based standards of care agreed to by a large multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine complications, visual outcomes, photic patient-reported symptoms, corneal morphology, IOL tilt, and intraocular pressure after implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) and iris prosthesis (IP) following iridocyclectomy.
METHODS: Patients with previous iridocyclectomy treated with an IOL and IP at the Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet between 2007 and 2018 were included in this national retrospective non-comparative case series. The assessment encompassed BCVA, PRO questionnaire, corneal topography, and anterior segment OCT.
RESULTS: 45 patients were included. Eight of 45 patients were previously treated with ruthenium-106 brachytherapy in conjunction with iridocyclectomy. Six of 45 patients developed endothelial dysfunction four of whom had received ruthenium-106 brachytherapy. Five of 45 patients had subluxation of the IOL/IP complex due to incomplete zonula apparatus. BCVA improved for all patients after lens surgery. 26 patients participated in the invited follow-up examination. 19 of 26 (73%) reported none or mild photic symptoms after IP instalment. Five (19%) reported ongoing severe photic symptoms. The corneal astigmatism significantly increased after iridocyclectomy but did not change after lens surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of an IOL and IP is a safe procedure, alleviating photic symptoms in most patients. It comes with higher risk of complications due to a more demanding procedure and larger surgical traumas from previous treatments. Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy increases the complication risk. Corneal astigmatism is induced by iridocyclectomy but does not change after lens surgery.

UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to review the long-term outcomes of ruthenium brachytherapy for iris and iridociliary melanoma.
UNASSIGNED: Medical records of patients who underwent ruthenium plaque treatment for iris and iridociliary melanoma at the Department of Ophthalmology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, between 1999 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: We identified 24 patients, including 17 women and 7 men, with a median age of 61.5 years (range, 35-84 years). Median observation time before treatment was 3 months (range, 0-68 months). Nineteen (79%) patients received a treatment with 20 mm CCB plaque, 5 (21%) with 15 mm CCA plaque and 2 (8%) patients received total irradiation to the entire iridocorneal angle. Median follow-up was 67.5 months (range, 24-265 months). We noted one (4%) recurrence managed by irradiating the anterior segment. Twelve (50%) patients developed post-operative cataracts in a median time of 38 months following treatment, 5 (21%) required topical medications to control intraocular pressure, and one (4%) developed chronic macular edema (CME) that was managed with anti-VEGF therapy. Final visual acuity between 1.0 and 0.5 was observed for 16 (67%) patients, between 0.49-0.1 for 5 (21%) patients, and below 0.09 for 3 (12%) patients. Nine (37%) patients maintained final visual acuity stable; in 4 (17%) patients, it dropped more than 3 lines, and improved in 6 (25%) patients.
UNASSIGNED: Ruthenium brachytherapy with standard applicators is an effective and safe way of treatment for iris and iridociliary melanoma. We observed no significant post-operative complications in a long-term observation.

UNASSIGNED: To report a patient with a unilateral presentation of glaucoma, pain, and acute iris transillumination syndrome simulating iris melanoma.
UNASSIGNED: A 53-year-old male presented with blurred vision and pain in his right eye several weeks following a respiratory sinus infection managed by oral azithromycin. Examination of the right eye was notable for elevated intraocular pressure of 46 mm Hg, an irregular mid-dilated pupil, and diffuse iris transillumination with pigmentary seeding on the iris surface, in the anterior chamber angle, and on the sclera, suspicious for diffuse iris melanoma with glaucoma and extrascleral extension. Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) of the right eye revealed circumferential anterior chamber angle and trabecular meshwork involvement by an infiltrative process corresponding to the pigmented cells noted clinically, while the ciliary body was unremarkable. Following enucleation, histopathology showed extensive necrosis of the iris pigment epithelium, sphincter, and dilator muscles with melanophagic infiltration in the anterior chamber angle and episclera, mild chronic non-granulomatous iridocyclitis, and no evidence of a melanocytic neoplasm. Although immunohistochemical studies for herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, and cytomegalovirus were negative, qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction on paraffin-embedded tissue detected HSV-1 DNA. The combined clinical, pathologic, and molecular findings were compatible with unilateral acute iris transillumination syndrome, likely HSV-1 associated.
UNASSIGNED: Unilateral acute iris transillumination syndrome with diffuse iris pigment epithelial loss can simulate iris melanoma. Prompt herpes viral studies may be informative.

UNASSIGNED: Determining the nature of iris melanocytic tumors based on clinical exam alone remains challenging. Tumor-associated vasculature of iris melanocytic lesions may facilitate the ability to discern between iris nevus and melanoma.
UNASSIGNED: In a single-institution, retrospective, observational study of 45 patients with pathologically confirmed iris melanoma and 15 patients with iris nevi that were either clinically stable or pathologically confirmed were included. Tumor characteristics and associated vasculature were identified on clinical exam and slit-lamp photographs. Fluorescein angiographic parameters including feeder vessels, intrinsic vessels, leakage, masking, and angiographic silence were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Feeder vessels were present in 17 (43%) melanomas and were absent in the nevus group (p = 0.002). Thirty-three (83%) iris melanomas and 5 (33%) iris nevi were observed to have intrinsic vessels, and a statistically significant association of intrinsic vessels with malignancy (p = 0.001) was noted. Fluorescein leakage was also observed more frequently in iris melanoma 39 (98%) than in nevi 9 (60) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). Angiographic silence occurred in 3 nevi (20%) and was not observed in any melanoma (p = 0.017). Overall, the presence of intrinsic vessels +/- feeder vessels had high sensitivity (0.85) and high positive predictive value (0.87) for diagnosis of iris melanoma.
UNASSIGNED: Anterior segment fluorescein angiography allows for the assessment of tumor-associated vascular patterns and demonstrates utility in differentiating iris nevi from melanoma. Feeder vessels were only observed in iris melanoma and were absent in iris nevi. The intrinsic vessels were present more frequently in melanomas and are thus associated with malignancy. Angiographic silence is indicative of iris nevi.

Uveal melanoma prognostication studies have mainly included posterior uveal melanomas located in the ciliary body and choroid, often excluding iris melanoma. In this study, we report prognostic status and survival outcomes in a series of 35 patients with biopsy-proven iris melanoma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in 10 (29%) cases and 2 (5%) underwent multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. In total, 9 cases demonstrated disomy 3, 2 cases with monosomy 3 (fluorescence in situ hybridization), and 1 had a technical failure. On gene expression profile testing, 20 of the 23 cases (90%) were gene expression profile class 1A, and the remaining 3 (10%) were class 1B. No patient had a Class 2 status. The median follow-up period was 49 months (mean 59, range 2-156 months). No metastasis was reported during follow-up, and metastasis-free survival was 100%. A review of the published literature revealed 47 cases with high-risk status on molecular prediction, of which only 6 (13%) developed metastasis. Ciliary body involvement was reported in 5 cases and was unknown in 2 cases. We conclude that molecular prognostication of iris melanoma demonstrates low-risk prognostic status in the majority of cases irrespective of the technique used. Even those with high-risk status do not develop metastasis unless the tumor involves the ciliary body.

This study evaluated the functional outcome and ocular side effects of patients receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) for the treatment of iris melanoma (IM).
This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data.
Patients with IM who underwent PBR as a primary treatment.
Treatment was given in the form of whole PBR (wPBR: n = 51) or segmental PBR (sPBR: n = 98).
Visual acuity (VA) and side effects were divided into ocular surface disease (OSD), secondary glaucoma, or cataract development.
A total of 149 eyes of 149 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 16.0 years were included. Tumor recurrence developed in 3 patients (wPBR: 1/51; sPBR: 2/98). Ocular surface disease was observed in 78.4% of the wPBR group (40/51) and 25.5% of the sPBR group (25/98) (P < 0.001) after 0.7 ± 1.2 years and 1.1 ± 0.9 years, respectively. The main side effect was dry eye syndrome in both groups, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure were found only in the wPBR group (4/51; 7.8%). Secondary glaucoma developed in 31.4% of the wPBR group (16/51) compared with 1.0% in the sPBR group (1/98; P < 0.001). Glaucoma control was generally achieved with eye drops, whereas surgery was necessary in 5 patients (wPBR: 4/51, 7.8%; sPBR: 1/98, 1%). Cataract surgery was performed in 47.9% of the wPBR group (23/48) and 19.8% of the sPBR group (19/96) (P < 0.001). Before treatment, VA was 0.14 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the wPBR group and 0.04 ± 0.19 logMAR in the sPBR group. A worsening was seen in the wPBR group (0.55 ± 0.16 logMAR; P < 0.001) 6 months after radiotherapy, which normalized after 12 months (0.15 ± 0.30 logMAR; P = 0.17). In the sPBR group, no such decrease in VA was observed (6 months: 0.03 ± 0.22 logMAR, P = 0.54; 12 months: 0.04 ± 0.21 logMAR, P = 0.98).
Our results demonstrate that PBR is a very successful treatment option for patients with IM, showing a high tumor control rate and relatively low complication profile. Tumor recurrence was a rare event, and secondary enucleation was not necessary in any patient. Side effects are commonly seen, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure or secondary glaucoma mainly developed after wPBR. These results are important for clinical decision making and discussion with the patient regarding this form of radiotherapy.
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.