BACKGROUND: The dynamic arterial elastance (EaDyn), calculated as pulse pressure variation divided by stroke volume variation, has been studied as a predictor of vasopressor weaning. However, its potential as a haemodynamic tool for tapering off vasopressors in patients with sepsis remains unexplored. Therefore, our study aimed to assess whether using EaDyn for weaning vasopressor support could reduce the duration of vasopressor support in patients with sepsis.
METHODS: This pragmatic single-centre controlled clinical trial will take place at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia. Adult patients diagnosed with septic shock according to the sepsis-3 criteria and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥4 will be included. A total of 114 patients (57 per group) will undergo conventional critical care monitoring, and the weaning of vasopressor support will be initiated based on the EaDyn or mean arterial pressure (MAP), depending on the assigned group. EaDyn will be estimated based on the measurements obtained from a PiCCO device connected to a PulsioFlex Monitoring Platform (PULSION Medical Systems SE, Feldkirchen, Germany). Our primary outcome is the difference in vasopressor support duration between the EaDyn and MAP groups.Participants and statisticians performing the statistical analysis will be blinded to the group allocation. Dependent and independent variables will be analysed through univariate and multivariate statistical tests. Since we will perform three repeated measurements for analysis, we will implement a Bonferroni post hoc correction. Additionally, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses will be conducted to address objectives related to time.
BACKGROUND: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (CCEI-16026-2024). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international events.
BACKGROUND: NCT06118775.

BACKGROUND: Sociodemographic variables influence health outcomes, either directly (ie, gender identity) or indirectly (eg, structural/systemic racism based on ethnoracial group). Identification of how sociodemographic variables can impact the health of critically ill adults is important to guide care and research design for this population. However, despite the growing recognition of the importance of collecting sociodemographic measures that influence health outcomes, insufficient and inconsistent data collection of sociodemographic variables persists in critical care studies. We aim to develop a set of core data variables (CoDaV) for social determinants of health specific to studies involving critically ill adults.
METHODS: We will conduct a scoping review to generate a list of possible sociodemographic measures to be used for round 1 of the modified Delphi processes. We will engage relevant knowledge users (previous intensive care unit patients and family members, critical care researchers, critical care clinicians and research co-ordinators) to participate in the modified Delphi consensus survey to identify the CoDaV. A final consensus meeting will be held with knowledge user representatives to discuss the final CoDaV, how each sociodemographic variable will be collected (eg, level of granularity) and how to disseminate the CoDaV for use in critical care studies.
BACKGROUND: The University of Calgary conjoint health research ethics board has approved this study protocol (REB22-1648).

OBJECTIVE: The utilisation of pH level measurements from gastric contents may indicate the preferred tip position of a nasogastric tube or monitor the efficacy of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. We aimed to determine the accuracy of pH strip (pHS) tests and pH liquid (pHL) tests compared with the standard pH meter (pHM).
METHODS: Diagnostic accuracy study.
METHODS: Gastric contents from medically critically ill patients.
METHODS: In total, 113 gastric samples were collected from 27 critically ill patients.
METHODS: The level of pH measured by pHM, pHS and pHL.
RESULTS: The pH values measured by pHM, pHS and pHL were 5.83 (IQR 5.12-6.61), 5.50 (IQR 5.00-6.00) and 5.75 (IQR 5.25-6.25), respectively. The pHS test showed greater accuracy, exhibiting a more positive correlation with the standard pHM measurement than the pHL test, with Y=0.95*X+0.56; rho=0.91, p<0.001, and Y=1.09*X - 0.72; rho=0.75, p<0.001, respectively. However, the pHS test demonstrated less agreement with the pHM than the pHL test, with biases of -0.27 versus 0.18, respectively. Noticeably, a slight variation in pHL from the standard pH values was found when we measured gastric contents with a pH lower than 5.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the pHS and pHL methods were good options for measuring gastric pH in critically ill patients. However, it was advisable to find alternative approaches to the pHL testing method when anticipated gastric acidity levels fall below 5.
BACKGROUND: TCTR20220530004.

OBJECTIVE: Mental health problems after discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) interfere with physical recovery and seriously affect daily life. Social support has been suggested to be associated with mental health but has not been sufficiently characterised. This study aimed to evaluate the association of social support before ICU admission with mental health after ICU discharge.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Medical-surgical ICU of a hospital in Japan.
METHODS: Patients admitted to the ICU for more than 48 hours were surveyed on social support prior to ICU admission, and 3 months after discharge from the ICU, mental health questionnaires were mailed to the patient.
METHODS: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-related symptoms were measured using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, and anxiety and depressive symptoms were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were enrolled; the prevalence of PTSD-related symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms 3 months after discharge from the ICU was 11.3%, 14.0% and 24.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex and years of education for PTSD-related symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms revealed that social support (β=-0.018, 95% CI: -0.029 to 0.006, p=0.002) and female sex (β=0.268, 95% CI: 0.005 to 0.531, p=0.046) were independent factors associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. In addition, sex differences were observed in the association between depressive symptoms and social support (p for interaction=0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher social support before ICU admission was not associated with PTSD symptoms after ICU discharge, although it may be associated with a lower prevalence depressive symptoms after ICU discharge. Therefore, it is important to provide necessary social support when needed.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1271540.].

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of heparin-binding protein (HBP) in sepsis and develop a sepsis diagnostic model incorporating HBP with key biomarkers and disease-related scores for rapid, and accurate diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: Clinical retrospective cross-sectional study.
METHODS: A comprehensive teaching tertiary hospital in China.
METHODS: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who underwent HBP testing or whose blood samples were collected when admitted to the ICU.
METHODS: HBP, C reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell count (WBC), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lactate (LAC), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were recorded.
RESULTS: Between March 2019 and December 2021, 326 patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were categorised into a non-infection group (control group), infection group, sepsis group and septic shock group based on the final diagnosis. The HBP levels in the sepsis group and septic shock group were 45.7 and 69.0 ng/mL, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group (18.0 ng/mL) and infection group (24.0 ng/mL) (p<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) value of HBP for diagnosing sepsis was 0.733, which was lower than those corresponding to PCT, CRP and SOFA but higher than those of IL-6, LAC and APACHE II. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified HBP, PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SOFA as valuable indicators for diagnosing sepsis. A sepsis diagnostic model was constructed based on these indicators, with an AUC of 0.901, a sensitivity of 79.7% and a specificity of 86.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: HBP could serve as a biomarker for the diagnosis of sepsis in the ICU. Compared with single indicators, the sepsis diagnostic model constructed using HBP, PCT, CRP, IL-6 and SOFA further enhanced the diagnostic performance of sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxaemic respiratory failure (HRF) affects nearly 15% of critically ill adults admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). An evidence-based, stakeholder-informed multidisciplinary care pathway (Venting Wisely) was created to standardise the diagnosis and management of patients with HRF and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Successful adherence to the pathway requires a coordinated team-based approach by the clinician team. The overall aim of this study is to describe the acceptability of the Venting Wisely pathway among critical care clinicians. Specifically, this will allow us to (1) better understand the user\'s experience with the intervention and (2) determine if the intervention was delivered as intended.
METHODS: This qualitative study will conduct focus groups with nurse practitioners, physicians, registered nurses and registered respiratory therapists from 17 Alberta ICUs. We will use template analysis to describe the acceptability of a multicomponent care pathway according to seven constructs of acceptability: (1) affective attitude;,(2) burden, (3) ethicality, (4) intervention coherence, (5) opportunity costs, (6) perceived effectiveness and (7) self-efficacy. This study will contribute to a better understanding of the acceptability of the Venting Wisely pathway. Identification of areas of poor acceptability will be used to refine the pathway and implementation strategies as ways to improve adherence to the pathway and promote its sustainability.
BACKGROUND: The study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at a scientific conference.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04744298.

OBJECTIVE: To compare catheter-related outcomes of individuals who received a tunnelled femorally inserted central catheter (tFICC) with those who received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the upper extremities.
METHODS: A propensity-score matched cohort study.
METHODS: A 980-bed tertiary referral hospital in South West Sydney, Australia.
METHODS: In-patients referred to the hospital central venous access service for the insertion of a central venous access device.
METHODS: The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of all-cause catheter failure. Secondary outcomes included the rates of catheters removed because of suspected or confirmed catheter-associated infection, catheter dwell and confirmed upper or lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
RESULTS: The overall rate of all-cause catheter failure in the matched tFICC and PICC cohort was 2.4/1000 catheter days (95% CI 1.1 to 4.4) and 3.0/1000 catheter days (95% CI 2.3 to 3.9), respectively, and when compared, no difference was observed (difference -0.63/1000 catheter days, 95% CI -2.32 to 1.06). We found no differences in catheter dwell (mean difference of 14.2 days, 95% CI -6.6 to 35.0, p=0.910); or in the cumulative probability of failure between the two groups within the first month of dwell (p=0.358). No significant differences were observed in the rate of catheters requiring removal for confirmed central line-associated bloodstream infection (difference 0.13/1000 catheter day, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.63, p=0.896). Similarly, no significant differences were found between the groups for confirmed catheter-related DVT (difference -0.11 per 1000 catheter days, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.04, p=1.00).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in catheter-related outcomes between the matched cohort of tFICC and PICC patients, suggesting that tFICCs are a possible alternative for vascular access when the veins of the upper extremities or thoracic region are not viable for catheterisation.

OBJECTIVE: There was no evidence regarding the relationship between septic shock and tracheal injury scores. Investigate whether septic shock was independently associated with tracheal injury scores in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with invasive ventilation.
METHODS: Prospective observational cohort study.
METHODS: Our study was conducted in a Class III hospital in Hebei province, China.
METHODS: Patients over 18 years of age admitted to the ICU between 31 May 2020 and 3 May 2022 with a tracheal tube and expected to be on the tube for more than 24 hours.
METHODS: Tracheal injuries were evaluated by examining hyperaemia, ischaemia, ulcers and tracheal perforation by fiberoptic bronchoscope. Depending on the number of lesions, the lesions were further classified as moderate, severe or confluent.
RESULTS: Among the 97 selected participants, the average age was 56.6±16.5 years, with approximately 64.9% being men. The results of adjusted linear regression showed that septic shock was associated with tracheal injury scores (β: 2.99; 95% CI 0.70 to 5.29). Subgroup analysis revealed a stronger association with a duration of intubation ≥8 days (p=0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with septic shock exhibit significantly higher tracheal injury scores compared with those without septic shock, suggesting that septic shock may serve as an independent risk factor for tracheal injury.
BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2000037842, registered 03 September 2020. Retrospectively registered, https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=57011&htm=4.

UNASSIGNED: Deep sedation on the ICU is linked to poor outcome. This study investigated the link between Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) and outcome in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO).
UNASSIGNED: We performed a secondary analysis of a single-center V-V ECMO cohort. RASS was used as a surrogate measure of sedation depth, patients with a score ≥ −1 were considered awake. V-V ECMO durations below 24 h were excluded. Primary endpoint was 30-day survival. Secondary endpoints were hospital survival and weaning from both ventilator and ECMO therapy.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 343 patients were reanalyzed. The median age was 55 years and 52.2% (179/343) survived for 30 days after ECMO cannulation. Median duration of ECMO was 7.9 (4.7–15.0) days and the median duration of mechanical ventilation after ECMO cannulation was 11.8 (6.7–23.8) days.In the whole cohort, median RASS on day one and seven after ECMO were − 4 (−4 to −1) and − 3 (−4 to 0), respectively. ECMO survivors consistently had significantly higher RASS scores during the first 7 days of ECMO compared to non-surviving patients (p < 0.01). On day two after ECMO, survival of awake patients (i.e., RASS ≥-1) was significantly better compared to sedated [i.e., RASS −4 to −2; OR 2.20 (1.28–3.71), p < 0.01] or unresponsive patients [i.e., RASS -5; OR 2.27 (1.15–4.64), p = 0.02]. The survival benefit of awake ECMO was consistent from day two to seven. Patients awake at least once during ECMO showed higher 30-day survival rates [64.4% vs. 39.6%, OR 2.75 (1.77–4.24), p < 0.01].
UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, awake patients on V-V ECMO showed higher 30-day survival rates compared to sedated or unresponsive patients. These data should encourage further research on awake V-V ECMO.