%0 Journal Article
%T Accuracy of pH strip testing and pH liquid testing versus standard pH meter of gastric contents in critically ill patients: a diagnostic accuracy study.
%A Phukpattanachai K
%A Praditseree N
%A Skjolaas S
%A Klaychaiya S
%A Trongtrakul K
%J BMJ Open
%V 14
%N 7
%D 2024 Jul 16
%M 39013655
%F 3.006
%R 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081830
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The utilisation of pH level measurements from gastric contents may indicate the preferred tip position of a nasogastric tube or monitor the efficacy of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. We aimed to determine the accuracy of pH strip (pHS) tests and pH liquid (pHL) tests compared with the standard pH meter (pHM).<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Diagnostic accuracy study.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Gastric contents from medically critically ill patients.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>In total, 113 gastric samples were collected from 27 critically ill patients.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>The level of pH measured by pHM, pHS and pHL.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The pH values measured by pHM, pHS and pHL were 5.83 (IQR 5.12-6.61), 5.50 (IQR 5.00-6.00) and 5.75 (IQR 5.25-6.25), respectively. The pHS test showed greater accuracy, exhibiting a more positive correlation with the standard pHM measurement than the pHL test, with Y=0.95*X+0.56; rho=0.91, p<0.001, and Y=1.09*X - 0.72; rho=0.75, p<0.001, respectively. However, the pHS test demonstrated less agreement with the pHM than the pHL test, with biases of -0.27 versus 0.18, respectively. Noticeably, a slight variation in pHL from the standard pH values was found when we measured gastric contents with a pH lower than 5.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Both the pHS and pHL methods were good options for measuring gastric pH in critically ill patients. However, it was advisable to find alternative approaches to the pHL testing method when anticipated gastric acidity levels fall below 5.<BR><B>BACKGROUND: </B>TCTR20220530004.