BACKGROUND: Medication safety in residential care facilities is a critical concern, particularly when nonmedical staff provide medication assistance. The complex nature of medication-related incidents in these settings, coupled with the psychological impact on health care providers, underscores the need for effective incident analysis and preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of the root causes, typically through incident-report analysis, is essential for mitigating medication-related incidents.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop and evaluate a multilabel classifier using natural language processing to identify factors contributing to medication-related incidents using incident report descriptions from residential care facilities, with a focus on incidents involving nonmedical staff.
METHODS: We analyzed 2143 incident reports, comprising 7121 sentences, from residential care facilities in Japan between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016. The incident factors were annotated using sentences based on an established organizational factor model and previous research findings. The following 9 factors were defined: procedure adherence, medicine, resident, resident family, nonmedical staff, medical staff, team, environment, and organizational management. To assess the label criteria, 2 researchers with relevant medical knowledge annotated a subset of 50 reports; the interannotator agreement was measured using Cohen κ. The entire data set was subsequently annotated by 1 researcher. Multiple labels were assigned to each sentence. A multilabel classifier was developed using deep learning models, including 2 Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers (BERT)-type models (Tohoku-BERT and a University of Tokyo Hospital BERT pretrained with Japanese clinical text: UTH-BERT) and an Efficiently Learning Encoder That Classifies Token Replacements Accurately (ELECTRA), pretrained on Japanese text. Both sentence- and report-level training were performed; the performance was evaluated by the F1-score and exact match accuracy through 5-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS: Among all 7121 sentences, 1167, 694, 2455, 23, 1905, 46, 195, 1104, and 195 included \"procedure adherence,\" \"medicine,\" \"resident,\" \"resident family,\" \"nonmedical staff,\" \"medical staff,\" \"team,\" \"environment,\" and \"organizational management,\" respectively. Owing to limited labels, \"resident family\" and \"medical staff\" were omitted from the model development process. The interannotator agreement values were higher than 0.6 for each label. A total of 10, 278, and 1855 reports contained no, 1, and multiple labels, respectively. The models trained using the report data outperformed those trained using sentences, with macro F1-scores of 0.744, 0.675, and 0.735 for Tohoku-BERT, UTH-BERT, and ELECTRA, respectively. The report-trained models also demonstrated better exact match accuracy, with 0.411, 0.389, and 0.399 for Tohoku-BERT, UTH-BERT, and ELECTRA, respectively. Notably, the accuracy was consistent even when the analysis was confined to reports containing multiple labels.
CONCLUSIONS: The multilabel classifier developed in our study demonstrated potential for identifying various factors associated with medication-related incidents using incident reports from residential care facilities. Thus, this classifier can facilitate prompt analysis of incident factors, thereby contributing to risk management and the development of preventive strategies.

Wildlife rescue centres are specialised units with ecological, conservational and veterinary medical activities, which include treatment, rehabilitation, breeding and releasing rare and endangered wild animals into their natural habitat, as well as environmental education. These centres provide an opportunity to monitor ongoing ecological changes in wildlife, environmental pollution and emerging diseases. With the present study, we aimed to analyse the causes and conservation status of the largest wildlife rehabilitation centre in Bulgaria. A total of 18,720 patients, from 26 orders with various conservation statuses and different etiology, have been admitted to the rehabilitation centre for over 25 years. The summarised results showed that 40% of the patients were admitted with an unknown etiology and the proportion of anthropogenic causes was 18%. Natural factors related to incidents with wild animals were 32%, while a share of 10% of the wildlife which resided at the WRBC referred to a part of re-introduction programmes. This type of analysis of wildlife rehabilitation centres could provide useful information about the status of populations and ecosystems, as well as support conservation practices.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cancer in the world. In Saudi Arabia, CRC is the most common cancer in males and the third most common in females, and its incidence rate is rising as the country continues to develop. However, the country does not have a national CRC screening program for CRC. This review aims to review recent studies that have attempted to address and rectify this issue and discern the most notable and prevalent barriers. Despite these efforts, guidelines are still lacking. Two prospective studies have been conducted in recent years, one of which was a national pilot screening program conducted by the Ministry of Health (MOH). While both had a similar number of participants, the colonoscopy rate for patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in the MOH program was only 20% compared to 75.8% in the Al-Kharj program. Awareness of the Saudi population regarding CRC and its screening appears to be insufficient. The most common barriers to patients\' willingness to undergo screening were embarrassment, fear, and pain. Barriers to physicians are mostly related to factors outside their hands, such as lack of equipment and time. We conclude that efforts should be made to establish a national screening program and improve awareness of the population and physicians.

BACKGROUND: Veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students work and train in a variety of environments and are exposed to a wide range of hazards.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the rate of health and safety incidents and injuries between veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students. (2) To investigate the health and safety hazard controls present in Australian veterinary workplaces.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study, using an online questionnaire.
METHODS: Anonymous links to the questionnaire were disseminated to Australian veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students.
RESULTS: A total of 494 veterinarians, 484 veterinary nurses and 212 veterinary students completed the survey. Incidents and injuries were common, particularly sharps-related injuries and animal bites. Australian veterinary nurses and veterinarians experienced the studied incidents at similar rates to each other. Veterinary students experienced some incidents and injuries at rates higher than both veterinarians and veterinary nurses, including heatstroke, hypothermia, sunburn, electric shock, loss of consciousness, being rammed or pushed over by an animal and farm equipment injuries. Of the workplace hazard controls reported, first aid boxes were most commonly present, and safety meetings occurred least commonly. Veterinary nurses received Q fever and rabies vaccines much less frequently than veterinarians and veterinary students.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that improvements need to be made to the occupational health and safety standards in the Australian veterinary sector. Veterinarians and veterinary nurses had suboptimal rates of access to many of the required and critical workplace health and safety controls. Improvements to the standard of health and safety training of veterinary students are indicated, given their higher rates of certain incidents and injury.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is defined as the prevention of harm to patients and aims to prevent errors. This analysis explores factors associated with the reported occurrence of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in general practices in Ireland at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: The PRICOV-19 was a cross-sectional study to record the (re)organisation of care provided in general practice and changes implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38 countries. Primary outcomes include three potential scenarios of PSIs: delayed care due to practice factors, delayed care due to patient factors, and delayed care due to triage. Exploratory variables included demographic and organisational characteristics, triage, collaboration, and strategies to safeguard staff members\' well-being.
RESULTS: Of the 172 participating Irish general practices, 71% (n = 122) recorded at least one potential PSI. The most frequent incident was delayed care due to patient factors (65%), followed by practice (33%) and triage (30%). Multivariate analysis showed that delayed care due to patient factors was associated with changes in the process of repeat prescriptions (OR 6.7 [CI 95% 2.5 to 19.6]). Delayed care due to practice factors was associated with suburbs/small towns (OR 4.2 [1.1 to 19.8]) and structural changes to the reception (OR 3.5 [1.2 to 11.4]). While delayed care due to patient factors was associated with having a practice population of 6000-7999 patients (OR 4.7 [1.1 to 27.6]) and delayed care due to practice factors was associated with having a practice population of 2000-3999 patients (OR 4.2 [1.2 to 17.1]). No linear associations were observed with higher or lower patient numbers for any factor. Delayed care due to triage was not associated with any exploratory variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in dramatic changes in the delivery of care through general practices in Ireland. Few factors were associated with the reported occurrence of PSIs, and these did not show consistent patterns. Sustained improvements were made in relation to repeat prescriptions. The lack of consistent patterns, potentially confirms that the autonomous decisions made in general practice in response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic could have benefitted patient safety (See Graphical abstract).

Incidents related to patient safety are a problem of great impact in Intensive Care Medicine (ICM). Multiple strategies have been developed to identify them, analyze, and develop policies aim at reducing their incidence and minimizing their effects and consequences. The development of a safety culture, an adequate organizational and structural design of the ICM, which contemplates the implementation of effective safe practices, with a provision of human resources adjusted to the care activity carried out and the periodic analysis of the different events and their factors, will allow us to bring the risk of critical patient care closer to zero, as would be desirable.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The safety of care provided is based on an analysis of medication incidents and accidents.
UNASSIGNED: The primary objective was to describe medication-related incidents and accidents (I&A) within a university-affiliated hospital.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective descriptive study was based on data from a 500-bed mother-child university-affiliated hospital. All I&As declared between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022, were considered. The analysis included all medication-related I&As that occurred during an admission or in an outpatient setting. Some variables were recoded manually. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 284 I&As were considered, including 7578 medication-related I&As. Daily averages of 15.9 ± 14.0 I&As and 5.2 ± 0.3 medication-related I&As were reported. There were 22.4 medication-related I&As/1000 inpatient days. The majority of medication-related I&As occurred in surgery (20%, 1530/7578), oncology (19%, 1405/7578), and pediatrics (16%, 1200/7578). Most were associated with incorrect dosing (21%, 1575/7578); infiltration, extravasation, or removed lines (19%, 1405/7578); and omissions (16%, 1205/7578). Physical consequences were reported in 15% (1158/7578) of the medication-related I&As. Conversely, psychological consequences were reported in less than 1% (44/7578) of medication-related I&As.
UNASSIGNED: This study provides a comprehensive descriptive profile over a 4-year period. Most of the reported I&As did not lead to consequences for patients. The sharing of ratios promotes comparative analysis with other facilities and can contribute to discussions about risk reduction. A culture of reporting events is present within this health care facility.

UNASSIGNED: Since 2022, it has been mandatory in Québec to report all incidents and accidents (I&As) occurring in health-care facilities. Since 2011, a summary report of these I&As has been published each year. However, it is difficult to compare health facilities given that no denominator is specified and ratios are not calculated.
UNASSIGNED: The primary objective was to calculate the ratios of total I&As and medication-related I&As per 1000 inpatient-days per type of facility for all health-care facilities in Québec.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective descriptive study was based on data from the period of April 1, 2016, to March 31, 2021. Data were extracted from the National Register of Incidents and Accidents Occurring during the Provision of Health Care and Social Services in Québec (Registre national des incidents et accidents survenus lors de la prestation des soins et services de santé au Québec) and financial reports. The ratios of total I&As/1000 inpatient-days and medication-related I&As/1000 inpatient-days, expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and median [minimum; maximum], were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 85 health-care facilities had usable data, specifically 33 acute-care facilities, 45 long-term care facilities, and 7 rehabilitation facilities. The mean ratio for total I&As/1000 inpatient-days varied from 33 ± 19 to 38 ± 22 in acute-care facilities, from 14 ± 5 to 16 ± 7 in long-term care facilities, and from 99 ± 39 to 147 ± 55 in rehabilitation facilities. The mean ratio for medication-related I&As/1000 inpatient-days varied from 11 ± 7 to 12 ± 7 in acute care facilities, from 3 ± 2 to 4 ± 3 in long-term care facilities, and from 24 ± 10 to 40 ± 21 in rehabilitation facilities.
UNASSIGNED: This exploratory study demonstrated the feasibility of calculating I&A ratios from the National Register of Incidents and Accidents Occurring during the Provision of Health Care and Social Services in Québec. These ratios facilitate discussion of the reporting culture of I&As within the health-care system. It is hoped that these ratios will be added to future annual reports from the Québec I&A register.

UNASSIGNED: Diving injuries are influenced by a multitude of factors. Literature analysing the full chain of events in diving accidents influencing the occurrence of diving injuries is limited. A previously published \'chain of events analysis\' (CEA) framework consists of five steps that may sequentially lead to a diving fatality. This study applied four of these steps to predominately non-lethal diving injuries and aims to determine the causes of diving injuries sustained by divers treated by the Diving Medical Centre of the Royal Netherlands Navy.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study was performed on diving injuries treated by the Diving Medical Centre between 1966 and 2023. Baseline characteristics and information pertinent to all four steps of the reduced CEA model were extracted and recorded in a database.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 288 cases met the inclusion criteria. In 111 cases, all four steps of the CEA model could be applied. Predisposing factors were identified in 261 (90%) cases, triggers in 142 (49%), disabling agents in 195 (68%), and 228 (79%) contained a (possible-) disabling condition. The sustained diving injury led to a fatality in seven cases (2%). The most frequent predisposing factor was health conditions (58%). Exertion (19%), primary diver errors (18%), and faulty equipment (17%) were the most frequently identified triggers. The ascent was the most frequent disabling agent (52%).
UNASSIGNED: The CEA framework was found to be a valuable tool in this analysis. Health factors present before diving were identified as the most frequent predisposing factors. Arterial gas emboli were the most lethal injury mechanism.