image quality

图像质量
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目标是开发与18F-FDGPET/CT检查相关的信息共享的通信支持材料。方法:该研究采用定性设计,采用多相结构。开发了通信支持材料的原型,该原型由与18F-FDGPET/CT检查有关的插图和文本组成。首次对计划进行18F-FDGPET/CT检查的患者进行了访谈,从具有18F-FDGPET/CT经验的卫生保健专业人员那里收集问卷。对通信支持材料进行了修订,直到就此达成共识。结果:结果基于对患者的访谈(n=10)和从医疗保健专业人员那里收集的问卷(n=9)。总体主题表明,有关18F-FDGPET/CT检查的患者信息是文本和插图之间的平衡行为。分析显示了两个类别:“插图作为补充”和“易于理解的布局。结论:参与者通过从各个角度引入有价值的观点,加强了传播支持材料的开发。结果支持以人为中心的方法,其中有关18F-FDGPET/CT检查的信息可以适应每个患者的需求,作为文本和插图之间的平衡行为。
    Our aim was to develop communication support material for information sharing related to an 18F-FDG PET/CT examination. Methods: The study had a qualitative design adapting a multiphase structure. A prototype of communication support material consisting of illustrations and text related to an 18F-FDG PET/CT examination was developed. Interviews were conducted with patients scheduled for an 18F-FDG PET/CT examination for the first time, and questionnaires were collected from health care professionals with experience in 18F-FDG PET/CT. The communication support material was revised until consensus was reached about it. Results: The results are based on interviews with patients (n = 10) and questionnaires collected from health care professionals (n = 9). The overall theme revealed that patient information about an 18F-FDG PET/CT examination is a balancing act between text and illustrations. The analysis showed 2 categories: \"illustrations as a complement\" and \"easy-to-understand layout.\" Conclusion: The participants strengthened the development of the communication support material by bringing in valuable viewpoints from various perspectives. The results support a person-centered approach in which information about an 18F-FDG PET/CT examination can be adapted to each patient\'s needs as a balancing act between text and illustrations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与传统的混合迭代重建(HIR)相比,评估具有深度学习图像重建(DLIR)的低keV多相计算机断层扫描(CT)在改善胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)勾画中的有用性。回顾性评估了35例接受多相CT检查的PDAC患者。使用HIR(ASiR-V50%)和DLIR(TrueFidelity-H),用两个能级(40keV和70keV)的虚拟单色成像(VMI)重建原始数据。根据胰腺实质期图像中肿瘤和正常胰腺中感兴趣区域内的CT值计算对比噪声比(CNRtoma)。PDAC在40-keVHIR胰腺实质期的显着性病变,40-keVDLIR,70-keVDLIR图像以5分制进行定性评级,使用两名放射科医生的70-keVHIR图像作为参考(评分1=较差;评分3=相当于参考;评分5=优秀)。40-keVDLIR图像的CNR肿瘤(中位数10.4,四分位距(IQR)7.8-14.9)明显高于其他VMI(40keVHIR,中位数6.2,IQR4.4-8.5,P<0.0001;70keVDLIR,中位数6.3,IQR5.1-9.9,P=0.0002;70keVHIR,中位数4.2,IQR3.1-6.1,P<0.0001)。40-keVDLIR图像的CNR肿瘤明显优于40-keVHIR和70-keVHIR图像的CNR肿瘤72±22%和211±340%,分别。40-keVDLIR图像(观察者1,4.5±0.7;观察者2,3.4±0.5)的病变显著性得分显着高于40-keVHIR(观察者1,3.3±0.9,P<0.0001;观察者2,3.1±0.4,P=0.013)。与常规HIR相比,DLIR是一种有前途的重建方法,可改善胰腺实质期40-keVVMI中的PDAC轮廓。
    To evaluate the usefulness of low-keV multiphasic computed tomography (CT) with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in improving the delineation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared to conventional hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR). Thirty-five patients with PDAC who underwent multiphasic CT were retrospectively evaluated. Raw data were reconstructed with two energy levels (40 keV and 70 keV) of virtual monochromatic imaging (VMI) using HIR (ASiR-V50%) and DLIR (TrueFidelity-H). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNRtumor) was calculated from the CT values within regions of interest in tumor and normal pancreas in the pancreatic parenchymal phase images. Lesion conspicuity of PDAC in pancreatic parenchymal phase on 40-keV HIR, 40-keV DLIR, and 70-keV DLIR images was qualitatively rated on a 5-point scale, using 70-keV HIR images as reference (score 1 = poor; score 3 = equivalent to reference; score 5 = excellent) by two radiologists. CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images (median 10.4, interquartile range (IQR) 7.8-14.9) was significantly higher than that of the other VMIs (40 keV HIR, median 6.2, IQR 4.4-8.5, P < 0.0001; 70-keV DLIR, median 6.3, IQR 5.1-9.9, P = 0.0002; 70-keV HIR, median 4.2, IQR 3.1-6.1, P < 0.0001). CNRtumor of 40-keV DLIR images were significantly better than those of the 40-keV HIR and 70-keV HIR images by 72 ± 22% and 211 ± 340%, respectively. Lesion conspicuity scores on 40-keV DLIR images (observer 1, 4.5 ± 0.7; observer 2, 3.4 ± 0.5) were significantly higher than on 40-keV HIR (observer 1, 3.3 ± 0.9, P < 0.0001; observer 2, 3.1 ± 0.4, P = 0.013). DLIR is a promising reconstruction method to improve PDAC delineation in 40-keV VMI at the pancreatic parenchymal phase compared to conventional HIR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在证明使用光子计数探测器CT(PCD-CT)在门静脉期(PVP)的常规腹部CT扫描中,碘对比剂(CM)与总重量相比减少(TBW)和在最新的能量积分探测器CT(EID-CT)上适应kV的CM注射方案,同时保持足够的图像质量(IQ)。
    方法:比较了EID-CT(2022年11月-2024年3月)和PCD-CT(2023年9月-2023年12月)的连续对比增强腹部PVPCT扫描。CM参数(总碘负荷(TIL),报告了碘递送率(IDR)和给药因子(DF)。基于TBW和kV的个性化采集和CM注入协议应用于EID-CT,并且TBW适应的CM注入协议用于PCD-CT。用平均衰减评估客观智商(Hounsfield单位,HU),信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR))。2位专家读者根据诊断信心通过5点Likert量表评估主观智商。
    结果:根据91次EID-CT扫描和102次PCD-CT扫描,观察到PCD-CT的TIL降低20.1%。PCD-CT显示出较高的SNR(9.9±1.7与9.1±1.8,p<0.001)和CNR(5.1±1.7vs.4.3±1.3,p<0.001)与EID-CT相比。主观智商评估显示,所有扫描均具有足够的诊断智商。
    结论:与EID-CT相比,PCD-CT可以降低CM,同时提供更高的SNR和CNR,使用临床个性化扫描和CM注射方案。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to demonstrate reduced iodine contrast media (CM) in routine abdominal CT scans in portal venous phase (PVP) using a photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) compared to total body weight (TBW) and kV-adapted CM injection protocols on a state-of-the-art energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) while maintaining sufficient image quality (IQ).
    METHODS: Consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominal PVP CT scans from an EID-CT (Nov 2022-March 2024) and a PCD-CT (Sep 2023-Dec 2023) were compared. CM parameters (total iodine load (TIL), iodine delivery rate (IDR) and dosing factor (DF)) were reported. An individualized acquisition and CM injection protocol based on TBW and kV was applied for the EID-CT and a TBW adapted CM injection protocol was used for the PCD-CT. Objective IQ was evaluated with mean attenuation (Hounsfield Units, HU), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)). Subjective IQ was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale by 2 expert readers based on diagnostic confidence.
    RESULTS: Based on 91 EID-CT scans and 102 PCD-CT scans a TIL reduction of 20.1 % was observed for PCD-CT. PCD-CT demonstrated significantly higher SNR (9.9 ± 1.7 vs. 9.1 ± 1.8, p < 0.001) and CNR (5.1 ± 1.7 vs. 4.3 ± 1.3, p < 0.001) compared to EID-CT. Subjective IQ assessment showed that all scans had sufficient diagnostic IQ.
    CONCLUSIONS: PCD-CT allows for CM reduction while providing higher SNR and CNR compared to EID-CT, using clinical individualized scan and CM injection protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床透视和电影血管造影图像中的时空变异性与非线性图像处理相结合,阻止了传统图像质量测量在心导管实验室中的应用。我们旨在开发和验证方法来测量人类观察者对图像质量的印象。
    获取安乐死猪的胸部的多帧图像以提供解剖背景。检测器剂量从6到200nGy(增量2倍)变化,并且使用0.6和1.0mm的焦斑。将两个具有/不具有0.5mm间隔的冠状动脉支架和具有半球形缺损的合成右冠状动脉(RCA)嵌入背景图像中作为测试对象。定量观察者(n=17)的表现是使用两次交替的强制选择测试来测量支架是否分离以及可见的右冠状动脉缺陷的计数。对噪音的定性印象,空间分辨率,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量整体图像质量。使用配对t检验和多项logistic回归模型来确定影响观察者印象图像质量的有统计学意义的因素。
    正确检测支架分离的比例和报告的右冠状动脉缺陷的数量随着检测器剂量在6至100nGy中的增加而显着变化(p<0.05)。尽管对于这些定量评估,趋势倾向于0.6毫米与1.0毫米的焦点,这是微不足道的。随着检测器剂量增量在24至100nGy范围内和焦斑尺寸(p<0.05),视觉模拟量标测量值显著变化。将多项逻辑回归分析应用于观察者VAS评分,证明了应用于定量观察者绩效测量的配对t检验的敏感性匹配。
    观察者对图像质量的印象的定量和定性测量都对与改变检测器剂量和焦斑大小相关的图像质量变化敏感。这些发现鼓励使用定性图像质量测量来评估临床透视和血管造影图像质量的未来工作。
    UNASSIGNED: Spatio-temporal variability in clinical fluoroscopy and cine angiography images combined with nonlinear image processing prevents the application of traditional image quality measurements in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. We aimed to develop and validate methods to measure human observer impressions of the image quality.
    UNASSIGNED: Multi-frame images of the thorax of a euthanized pig were acquired to provide an anatomical background. The detector dose was varied from 6 to 200 nGy (increments 2×), and 0.6 and 1.0 mm focal spots were used. Two coronary stents with/without 0.5 mm separation and a synthetic right coronary artery (RCA) with hemispherical defects were embedded into the background images as test objects. The quantitative observer ( n = 17 ) performance was measured using a two-alternating forced-choice test of whether stents were separated and by a count of visible right coronary artery defects. Qualitative impressions of noise, spatial resolution, and overall image quality were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). A paired t -test and multinomial logistic regression model were used to identify statistically significant factors affecting the observer\'s impression image quality.
    UNASSIGNED: The proportion of correct detection of stent separation and the number of reported right coronary artery defects changed significantly with detector dose increment in the 6 to 100 nGy ( p < 0.05 ). Although a trend favored the 0.6 versus 1.0 mm focal spot for these quantitative assessments, this was insignificant. Visual analog scale measurements changed significantly with detector dose increments in the range of 24 to 100 nGy and focal spot size ( p < 0.05 ). The application of multinomial logistic regression analysis to observer VAS scores demonstrated sensitivity matching of the paired t -test applied to quantitative observer performance measurements.
    UNASSIGNED: Both quantitative and qualitative measurements of observer impression of the image quality were sensitive to image quality changes associated with changing the detector dose and focal spot size. These findings encourage future work that uses qualitative image quality measurements to assess clinical fluoroscopy and angiography image quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近距离摄影测量应用中的移动设备相机和负担得起的全画幅无反光镜相机的性能的比较评估涉及评估这两种类型的相机在捕获用于3D测量目的的图像方面的能力。在这项研究中,进行实验以比较失真水平,精度性能,以及当在各种设置的近距离摄影测量应用中使用时,移动设备相机相对于全画幅无反光镜相机的图像质量。使用分析方法和专门的数字工具来评估结果。最后,得出了在近景摄影测量应用中使用每种技术的广义结论。
    The comparative evaluation of the performance of a mobile device camera and an affordable full-frame mirrorless camera in close-range photogrammetry applications involves assessing the capabilities of these two types of cameras in capturing images for 3D measurement purposes. In this study, experiments are conducted to compare the distortion levels, the accuracy performance, and the image quality of a mobile device camera against a full-frame mirrorless camera when used in close-range photogrammetry applications in various settings. Analytical methodologies and specialized digital tools are used to evaluate the results. In the end, generalized conclusions are drawn for using each technology in close-range photogrammetry applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估使用深度学习(DL)重建的加速TurboSpinEcho序列的诊断性能和图像质量,与儿童和年轻人的膝盖和脚踝MRI的常规序列相比。
    方法:IRB批准的前瞻性研究,包括来自48名受试者的49个MRI(10名男性,平均年龄16.4岁,7-29年),每个MRI由常规和DL序列组成。盲目评估序列以确定预测值,灵敏度,使用常规序列和膝关节镜(如果有)作为参考的DL序列和特异性。评估了Physeal的通畅性和外观。比较定性参数。评估不期望的图像改变的存在。
    结果:膝关节和脚踝异常发现的患病率为11.7%(75/640),和11.5%(19/165),分别。使用常规序列作为参考,膝关节DL序列的敏感性和特异性分别为90.7%和99.3%,脚踝分别为100.0%和100.0%。以关节镜为参考,DL序列的敏感性和特异性分别为80.0%和95.8%,常规序列分别为80.0%和97.9%。physeal状态的一致性为100.0%。与常规序列相比,DL序列在质量上“相同或更好”(p<0.032),除了PDFS序列的像素化伪影(p=0.233)。在膝关节DL序列中未发现离散图像改变。在脚踝,我们确定了一个涉及肌腱的DL伪影(0.8%,1/125).DL序列比常规序列快2倍(p<0.001)。
    结论:在膝关节和踝关节MRI中,DL序列在一半的采集时间内提供了与传统序列相似的诊断性能和“相同或更好”的图像质量。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of accelerated Turbo Spin Echo sequences using deep-learning (DL) reconstructions compared to conventional sequences in knee and ankle MRIs of children and young adults.
    METHODS: IRB-approved prospective study consisting of 49 MRIs from 48 subjects (10 males, mean age 16.4 years, range 7-29 years), with each MRI consisting of both conventional and DL sequences. Sequences were evaluated blindly to determine predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of DL sequences using conventional sequences and knee arthroscopy (if available) as references. Physeal patency and appearance were evaluated. Qualitative parameters were compared. Presence of undesired image alterations was assessed.
    RESULTS: The prevalence of abnormal findings in the knees and ankles were 11.7% (75/640), and 11.5% (19/165), respectively. Using conventional sequences as reference, sensitivity and specificity of DL sequences in knees were 90.7% and 99.3%, and in ankles were 100.0% and 100.0%. Using arthroscopy as reference, sensitivity and specificity of DL sequences were 80.0% and 95.8%, and of conventional sequences were 80.0% and 97.9%. Agreement of physeal status was 100.0%. DL sequences were qualitatively \"same-or-better\" compared to conventional (p < 0.032), except for pixelation artifact for the PDFS sequence (p = 0.233). No discrete image alteration was identified in the knee DL sequences. In the ankle, we identified one DL artifact involving a tendon (0.8%, 1/125). DL sequences were faster than conventional sequences by a factor of 2 (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In knee and ankle MRIs, DL sequences provided similar diagnostic performance and \"same-or-better\" image quality than conventional sequences at half the acquisition time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究的目的是研究标准分辨率模式(SR)和超高分辨率模式(UHR)下PCD-CT在剂量下肢径流中的成像性能和质量差异匹配的CTA在人类尸体模型中。
    方法:使用蠕动泵通过腹股沟和pop入路在一个新鲜冷冻的人尸体中建立了上腿的体外灌注。在SFA中部署了七个外周支架。光子计数CTA在SR和UHR模式下使用剂量等效120kVp采集协议(低/中/高剂量:CTDIVol=3、5、10mGy)在造影剂灌注下进行,并用四个血管卷积核进行重建。使用方差分析比较了管腔能见度和对比度噪声比。使用成对评估主观图像质量,强制选择比较软件。
    结果:在使用的剂量水平下,SR和UHR的管腔能见度相等。对于(超)尖锐卷积核BV60(3mGy;UHRvs.SR,19.9±1.9vs.15.7±1.6,p<0.046)和BV76(8.0±0.6vs.5.4±0.3,p<0.001)。低剂量扫描的相对CNR增加高于高剂量扫描(BV76:48%vs.高剂量时36%,p<0.033)。当使用超尖锐内核时,UHR模式下低剂量扫描的CNR与SR模式下的高剂量扫描相当(8.0±0.6与9.1±1.1,p>0.760)。在UHR考试中,仅在BV76中可以测量到CNR的显着增加(8.0±0.6(3mGy)与12.4±0.9(10mGy),p<0.001)。读者更喜欢所有内核的UHR主观图像质量,其中BV76排名最高。
    结论:当结合低辐射剂量和超尖锐重建时,UHR模式的CNR增加最高。同时,UHR模式下的主观图像质量通常取代SR图像,提示进一步的剂量减少潜力。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the imaging performance and quality differences of PCD-CT in standard resolution mode (SR) versus ultra-high resolution mode (UHR) in the lower extremity runoff of dose-matched CTAs in a human cadaveric model.
    METHODS: Extracorporeal perfusion of the upper leg was established in one fresh-frozen human cadaver via inguinal and popliteal accesses using a peristaltic pump. Seven peripheral stents were deployed in the SFA. Photon-counting CTAs were performed under contrast perfusion in SR and UHR mode with dose-equivalent 120kVp acquisition protocols (low-/ medium-/ high-dose: CTDIVol=3, 5, 10 mGy) and reconstructed with four vascular convolution kernels. Lumen visibility and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared using analyses of variance. Subjective image quality was assessed using a pairwise, forced-choice comparison software.
    RESULTS: Lumen visibility was equal for SR and UHR at the used dose levels. CNR increase by UHR was significant for (ultra-)sharp convolution kernels BV60 (3 mGy; UHR vs. SR, 19.9 ± 1.9 vs. 15.7 ± 1.6, p < 0.046) and BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 5.4 ± 0.3, p < 0.001). The relative CNR increase was higher for low-dose than high-dose scans (BV76: 48% vs. 36% at high dose, p < 0.033). The CNR of the low-dose scan in UHR mode was comparable to the high-dose scan in SR mode when the ultra-sharp kernel was used (8.0 ± 0.6 vs. 9.1 ± 1.1, p > 0.760). Among UHR examinations, a significant increase in CNR could only be measured in BV76 (8.0 ± 0.6 (3 mGy) vs. 12.4 ± 0.9 (10 mGy), p < 0.001). Readers preferred subjective image quality of UHR for all kernels with BV76 being ranked highest.
    CONCLUSIONS: The CNR increase in UHR mode is highest when combining low radiation dose and ultra-sharp reconstructions. Meanwhile, the subjective image quality in UHR mode generally supersedes SR images, suggesting further dose reduction potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹部-盆腔计算机断层扫描(CT)的患者特定方案优化需要测量身体习性/大小(BH),敏感性-特异性(替代图像质量(IQ)指标)和风险(替代剂量通常)(RD)。这项工作提供了可用于这三个类别的优化变量中的每一个的更新的度量清单,这些变量可直接从患者测量值或图像中导出。我们主要在空间域中考虑客观IQ指标(即,那些与清晰度直接相关的,对比,噪声量/纹理和感知的可检测性,因为放射科医生使用这些来评估患者图像在实践中的可接受性或其他方式)。
    方法:使用的搜索引擎是PubMed,搜索周期为2010-2024。使用的关键词是:\'计算机断层摄影术\',\'CT\',\'abdom*\',\'剂量\',\'风险\',\'SSDE\',\'图像质量\',“水当量直径”,\'大小\',\'身体成分\',\'习惯*\',\'BMI\',\'obes*\',\'超重\'。由于BH对于患者特定的优化至关重要,与RD和BH相关的文章,并对IQ和BH进行了回顾。
    结果:清单包括11BH,12个IQ和6个RD指标。确定了25项RD与BH的相关性研究和9项IQ与BH的相关性研究。后一组中的7篇文章同时关联了所有三个类别的指标。
    结论:方案优化应根据个体患者和特定临床查询的水平进行微调。这将需要从三个类别中的每一个中明智地选择度量。有人建议,为了增加临床实践中的效用,未来更多的优化研究是基于临床任务的,同时涉及三类指标。
    OBJECTIVE: Patient-specific protocol optimisation in abdomino-pelvic Computed Tomography (CT) requires measurement of body habitus/size (BH), sensitivity-specificity (surrogates image quality (IQ) metrics) and risk (surrogates often dose quantities) (RD). This work provides an updated inventory of metrics available for each of these three categories of optimisation variables derivable directly from patient measurements or images. We consider objective IQ metrics mostly in the spatial domain (i.e., those related directly to sharpness, contrast, noise quantity/texture and perceived detectability as these are used by radiologists to assess the acceptability or otherwise of patient images in practice).
    METHODS: The search engine used was PubMed with the search period being 2010-2024. The key words used were: \'comput* tomography\', \'CT\', \'abdom*\', \'dose\', \'risk\', \'SSDE\', \'image quality\', \'water equivalent diameter\', \'size\', \'body composition\', \'habit*\', \'BMI\', \'obes*\', \'overweight\'. Since BH is critical for patient specific optimisation, articles correlating RD vs BH, and IQ vs BH were reviewed.
    RESULTS: The inventory includes 11 BH, 12 IQ and 6 RD metrics. 25 RD vs BH correlation studies and 9 IQ vs BH correlation studies were identified. 7 articles in the latter group correlated metrics from all three categories concurrently.
    CONCLUSIONS: Protocol optimisation should be fine-tuned to the level of the individual patient and particular clinical query. This would require a judicious choice of metrics from each of the three categories. It is suggested that, for increased utility in clinical practice, more future optimisation studies be clinical task based and involve the three categories of metrics concurrently.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨基于评分的扩散模型在加速乳腺MRI重建中的应用。
    方法:我们在9549例女性乳腺MRI检查中训练了一个基于评分的模型,并利用该模型重建具有2、5和20的欠采样因子的欠采样MRI图像。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生对图像进行评估,他们根据图像的整体质量和诊断价值在100次其他MRI检查的独立测试集上对图像进行了评估。
    结果:基于评分的模型产生高质量和诊断价值的MRI图像。T1和T2加权MRI图像都可以高度精确地重建。当加速因子为2时,在100%(放射科医生1)和99%(放射科医生2)的情况下,两名放射科医生将图像评为与原始图像几乎无法区分(5级评分为4或5)。对于5的加速因子,该分数下降到88%和70%,对于20的极端加速因子下降到5%和21%。
    结论:基于分数的模型可以以高保真度重建MRI图像,即使在相对较高的加速因子下,但是需要在更大规模的图像上进行进一步的工作,以确保诊断质量。
    结论:乳腺MRI检查的数量预计会增加,建议对乳腺致密的女性进行MRI筛查。加速的图像采集方法可以帮助使这种检查更容易访问。
    结论:加速乳腺MRI重建在临床环境中仍然是一个重大挑战。基于分数的扩散模型可以对中等欠采样因子实现近乎完美的重构。具有保持图像质量的更快的乳腺MRI扫描可以彻底改变临床工作流程和患者体验。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of the score-based diffusion model to accelerate breast MRI reconstruction.
    METHODS: We trained a score-based model on 9549 MRI examinations of the female breast and employed it to reconstruct undersampled MRI images with undersampling factors of 2, 5, and 20. Images were evaluated by two experienced radiologists who rated the images based on their overall quality and diagnostic value on an independent test set of 100 additional MRI examinations.
    RESULTS: The score-based model produces MRI images of high quality and diagnostic value. Both T1- and T2-weighted MRI images could be reconstructed to a high degree of accuracy. Two radiologists rated the images as almost indistinguishable from the original images (rating 4 or 5 on a scale of 5) in 100% (radiologist 1) and 99% (radiologist 2) of cases when the acceleration factor was 2. This fraction dropped to 88% and 70% for an acceleration factor of 5 and to 5% and 21% with an extreme acceleration factor of 20.
    CONCLUSIONS: Score-based models can reconstruct MRI images at high fidelity, even at comparatively high acceleration factors, but further work on a larger scale of images is needed to ensure that diagnostic quality holds.
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of MRI examinations of the breast is expected to rise with MRI screening recommended for women with dense breasts. Accelerated image acquisition methods can help in making this examination more accessible.
    CONCLUSIONS: Accelerating breast MRI reconstruction remains a significant challenge in clinical settings. Score-based diffusion models can achieve near-perfect reconstruction for moderate undersampling factors. Faster breast MRI scans with maintained image quality could revolutionize clinic workflows and patient experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不同磁共振成像(MRI)设备中胰腺表观扩散系数(ADC)值和体素内不相干运动(IVIM)参数值的一致性显著影响患者的诊断和治疗。
    目的:为了探索图像质量的一致性,ADC值,胰腺检查中不同MRI设备之间的IVIM参数值。
    方法:这项回顾性研究得到了当地伦理委员会的批准,并获得所有参与者的知情同意书.总的来说,22名健康志愿者(10名男性和12名女性),年龄24-61岁(平均值,28.9±2.3年)使用来自三个供应商的3.0TMRI设备进行了胰腺扩散加权成像。两名独立观察者对图像质量进行主观评分,并测量胰腺的总体ADC值和信噪比(SNR)。随后,针对IVIM参数(真实扩散系数,伪扩散系数,和灌注分数)使用后处理软件。这些ROI在头上,身体,和胰腺的尾巴.使用kappa一致性检验评估主观图像评级。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和混合线性模型来评估每个设备的定量参数值。最后,使用Bland-Altman图对每个装置的IVIM参数值进行成对分析。
    结果:不同观察者主观评分的Kappa值为0.776(P<0.05)。观察者间和观察者内定量参数协议的ICC值分别为0.803[95%置信区间(CI):0.684-0.880]和0.883(95CI:0.760-0.945),分别为(P<0.05)。不同设备之间信噪比的ICC具有可比性(P>0.05),不同器件ADC值的ICC分别为0.870、0.707和0.808(P<0.05)。值得注意的是,对于不同的IVIM参数,仅观察到少数具有统计学意义的器械间协议,其中,ICC值普遍较低.混合线性模型结果显示胰头f值存在差异(P<0.05),胰体的D值,以及使用不同MRI机器获得的胰尾D值。Bland-Altman图在某些数据点显示出显着的变异性。
    结论:ADC值在不同器件之间是一致的,但IVIM参数重复性适中。因此,例如,IVIM参数值的可变性可以与使用不同的MRI机器相关联。因此,使用IVIM参数值评估胰腺时应谨慎。
    BACKGROUND: The consistency of pancreatic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameter values across different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) devices significantly impacts the patient\'s diagnosis and treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore consistency in image quality, ADC values, and IVIM parameter values among different MRI devices in pancreatic examinations.
    METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. In total, 22 healthy volunteers (10 males and 12 females) aged 24-61 years (mean, 28.9 ± 2.3 years) underwent pancreatic diffusion-weighted imaging using 3.0T MRI equipment from three vendors. Two independent observers subjectively scored image quality and measured the pancreas\'s overall ADC values and signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Subsequently, regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated for the IVIM parameters (true diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction) using post-processing software. These ROIs were on the head, body, and tail of the pancrease. The subjective image ratings were assessed using the kappa consistency test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and mixed linear models were used to evaluate each device\'s quantitative parameter values. Finally, a pairwise analysis of IVIM parameter values across each device was performed using Bland-Altman plots.
    RESULTS: The Kappa value for the subjective ratings of the different observers was 0.776 (P < 0.05). The ICC values for inter-observer and intra-observer agreements for the quantitative parameters were 0.803 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.684-0.880] and 0.883 (95%CI: 0.760-0.945), respectively (P < 0.05). The ICCs for the SNR between different devices was comparable (P > 0.05), and the ICCs for the ADC values from different devices were 0.870, 0.707, and 0.808, respectively (P < 0.05). Notably, only a few statistically significant inter-device agreements were observed for different IVIM parameters, and among those, the ICC values were generally low. The mixed linear model results indicated differences (P < 0.05) in the f-value for the pancreas head, D-value for the pancreas body, and D-value for the pancreas tail obtained using different MRI machines. The Bland-Altman plots showed significant variability at some data points.
    CONCLUSIONS: ADC values are consistent among different devices, but the IVIM parameters\' repeatability is moderate. Therefore, the variability in the IVIM parameter values may be associated with using different MRI machines. Thus, caution should be exercised when using IVIM parameter values to assess the pancreas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号