Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main pathogen that causes hospitalization for acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRIs) in children. With the reopening of communities and schools, the resurgence of RSV in the COVID-19 post-pandemic era has become a major concern. To understand the circulation patterns and genotype variability of RSV in Tianjin before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, a total of 19,531 nasopharyngeal aspirate samples from hospitalized children in Tianjin from July 2017 to June 2022 were evaluated. Direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used for screening RSV-positive samples and subtyping, respectively. Further analysis of mutations in the second hypervariable region (HVR2) of the G gene was performed through Sanger sequencing. Our results showed that 16.46% (3,215/19,531) samples were RSV positive and a delayed increase in the RSV infection rates occurred in the winter season from December 2020 to February 2021, with the average RSV-positive rate of 35.77% (519/1,451). The ON1, with H258Q and H266L substitutions, and the BA9, with T290I and T312I substitutions, are dominant strains that alternately circulate every 1-2 years in Tianjin, China, from July 2017 to June 2022. In addition, novel substitutions, such as N296Y, K221T, N230K, V251A in the BA9 genotype, and L226I in the ON1 genotype, emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of clinical characteristics indicated no significant differences between RSV-A and RSV-B groups. This study provides a theoretical basis for clinical prevention and treatment. However, further studies are needed to explore the regulatory mechanism of host immune responses to different lineages of ON1 and BA9 in the future.

Diabetes mellitus is currently approaching epidemic proportions and disproportionately affects patients in the hospital setting. In the United States, individuals living with diabetes represent over 17 million emergency department visits and 8 million admissions annually. The management of these patients in the hospital setting is complex and differs considerably from the outpatient setting. All patients with hyperglycemia should be screened for diabetes, as in-hospital hyperglycemia portends a greater risk for morbidity, mortality, admission to an intensive care unit, and increased hospital length of stay. However, the definition of hyperglycemia, glycemic targets, and strategies to manage hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting can vary greatly depending on the population considered. Moreover, the presenting illness, changing nutritional status, and concurrent hospital medications often necessitate thoughtful consideration to adjustments of home diabetes regimens and/or the initiation of new insulin doses. This review article will examine core concepts and emerging new literature surrounding inpatient diabetes management, including glycemic targets, insulin dosing strategies, noninsulin medications, new diabetes technologies, inpatient diabetes management teams, and discharge planning strategies, to optimize patient safety and satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and even hospital financial health.

UNASSIGNED: Varenicline tartrate is a new and selective agonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine varenicline efficacy in smoking cessation among hospitalized patients.
UNASSIGNED: We looked through worldwide databases such as Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus. Relevant pieces of research published on varenicline efficacy on smoking cessation among hospitalized patients were discovered using proper keywords. The data were analyzed using Stata software version 14 and a random-effects model meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Nine studies were eligible to be included in this study, with a total sample size of 2131. Generally, the point abstinence rate was significantly greater in the varenicline group than in the placebo group at weeks 12 (odds ratio [OR]=0.59; 95% CI: 053-0.65; P<0.001), 24 (OR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; P<0.001), and 52 (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.92; P<0.001). Furthermore, the continuous abstinence rate for weeks 4 (OR=0.70; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P=0.000), 12 (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P<0.001), 24 (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 019-0.53; P<0.001), and 52 (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P<0.001) was significantly greater in the varenicline group than in the placebo group.
UNASSIGNED: According to the high efficacy of varenicline in both short- and long-term smoking settings and considering the importance of smoking cessation in high-risk hospitalized patients, varenicline consumption could be considered as a main smoking cessation strategy in these patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hospitalized patients can have inconsistent nutritional intake due to acute illness, changing diet, or unpredictable meal delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a hospital-wide policy shifting nutritional insulin administration from pre-meal to post-meal was associated with changes in glycemic control or length of stay (LOS).
METHODS: This retrospective study performed at a community hospital evaluated adult inpatients receiving nutritional insulin across three time periods. pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and distant post-intervention. Outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL), moderate hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL), severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dL), severe hyperglycemia (≥ 300 mg/dL), daily mean glucose level, and LOS.
RESULTS: The number of patient-days analyzed across the cohorts were 1948, 1751, and 3244, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, risk of developing any hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Daily mean glucose increased over time (194.6 ± 62.5 vs 196.8 ± 65.5 vs 199.3 ± 61.5 mg/dL; p = 0.003), but there were no significant differences among rates of severe hyperglycemia (p = 0.10) or LOS (p = 0.74).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a hospital-wide shift to postprandial nutritional insulin administration significantly reduced hypoglycemia rates without increasing severe hyperglycemia. This suggests a promising strategy for improving patient safety, but further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Background: Pericardial and pleural effusions are two complications recently described in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infections. There are several mechanisms that have been proposed and refer to SARS-CoV-2\'s capacity to bind to cell surfaces via various receptors and its broad tissue tropism that might cause significant complications. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of pericardial and pleural effusions during COVID-19 infection as well as to determine the risk factors associated with these complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study that included 346 patients admitted to the National Institute of Infectious Disease \"Prof. Dr. Matei Bals\" (Bucharest, Romania), from 1 January to 25 May 2021, during the third wave of the pandemic. Socio-demographic and anthropometric data were collected for each patient. The patients were evaluated clinically, biologically, and radiologically within 48 h of admission. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) patients with pericardial effusions-18; (2) patients with pleural effusions-28; (3) patients without pericardial/pleural effusions-294. Results: After exclusion criteria were applied, 337 patients were analyzed. The median age of the participants was 58.26 ± 14.58 years. More than half of the hospitalized patients had associated respiratory failure (61.5%), of which 2.7% had a critical form of the disease and 58.8% had a severe form. The cumulative percentage for pericardial and pleural effusions for the study group was 12.8% (43 patients out of 337). The prevalence of pericardial effusion was 5.3%, twice more frequent among male respondents. Pleural effusion was identified in 8.3% patients. Most patients had unilateral effusion (17), compared to 11 patients who had bilateral involvement. Based on laboratory results, patients with pericardial and pleural effusions exhibited increased levels of C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NT proBNP, and a higher value of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio. In contrast to patients without pleural and pericardial effusions, those with these symptoms experienced a higher frequency of severe or critical illness and longer hospital stays. Conclusions: Pericardial and pleural effusions can complicate COVID-19 infections. In our study, the prevalence of pericardial and pleural effusions in hospitalized patients was low, being associated with the same comorbidities and a number of clinical and biological parameters.

UNASSIGNED: To illustrate the challenges encountered when gathering rapidly synthesized evidence in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: In this article, we describe the challenges encountered when we performed a systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of treatments for severe COVID-19. The methods of the SLR are described in full, to show the context of our objectives. Then we use the results of the SLR to demonstrate the problems of producing synthesized evidence in this setting.
UNASSIGNED: Various challenges were identified during this SLR. These were primarily a result of heterogeneity in the study methodology of eligible studies. Definitions of the patient populations and outcome measurements were highly variable and the majority of studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, preventing quantitative synthesis of the collated evidence.
UNASSIGNED: Consolidating evidence from RCTs evaluating COVID-19 interventions was problematic. Guidance is needed for scenarios with high rapid output in primary research.

OBJECTIVE: Elevated uric acid (UA) levels have been associated with acute and chronic diseases, which could affect the prognosis of pediatric hospitalized patients. However, the association of UA levels with length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality in hospitalized children and adolescents remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association of serum UA levels with in-hospital mortality and prolonged LOS in hospitalized children and adolescents.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving 128 patients under 18 years of age, admitted to a tertiary-care hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. UA levels were assessed with an average of 3 days before the in-hospital outcome (discharge or death). Logistic regression was used to determine the association of UA with prolonged LOS (defined as over 30 days of hospitalization), while Cox regression multivariate analysis was employed to assess UA as a predictor of in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: UA levels showed an inverse association with prolonged LOS. Specifically, for every 1 mg/dL increase in UA level, the odds of experiencing prolonged LOS decreased by 31% (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95). Additionally, individuals with elevated UA levels had lower odds of prolonged LOS (OR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.66). However, UA levels were not associated with in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.94-2.82).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum UA was inversely associated with LOS among children and adolescents, but no association was observed with in-hospital mortality.

A prospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of older adults ≥65 years (n = 329), admitted to the acute medical unit (AMU) of a tertiary hospital, to describe and compare characteristics including frailty status and clinical outcomes. Multivariable models compared older adults with and without a history of cancer to determine characteristics associated with frailty and pre-frailty. An adjusted Poisson regression model was used to compare the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two groups. About one-fifth (22%) of the cohort had a history of cancer. The most common cancer types were prostate (n = 20), breast (n = 13), lung (n = 8) and gastrointestinal (n = 8). There was no difference in the prevalence of pre-frailty/frailty among patients with or without a history of cancer (58% vs. 57%, p > 0.05). Pre-frailty/frailty was associated with polypharmacy (OR 8.26, 95% CI: 1.74 to 39.2) and malnutrition (OR 8.91, 95% CI: 2.15 to 36.9) in patients with a history of cancer. Adjusted analysis revealed that the risk of having a longer LOS was 24% higher in older adults with a history of cancer than those without (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41, p < 0.001). Clinicians in the AMU should be aware that older adults with a history of cancer have a higher risk of a longer LOS compared to those without.

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress is a predictor of future health and disease data, with consequent implications for both the patient and the healthcare system. Taking advantage of the unprecedented situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic we aimed to assess whether the type of medical care received by patients during the initial months of the pandemic influenced their evolution, particularly at the psychological level. Additionally, we investigated whether allostatic load was associated not only with physical but also psychological alterations.
METHODS: All the patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infection at HM Madrid Hospital during the month of March 2020 were studied, both those hospitalized (110) and those treated on an outpatient basis (46). They were psychologically evaluated using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) test. We calculated the allostatic load using different laboratory parameters.
RESULTS: Outpatient patients had significantly higher scores than hospitalized ones in Tension-Anxiety (52 ± 19.3 vs. 38 ± 4.3; p < 0.001). So, 36.9% of the outpatient patients exhibited anxiety. Allostatic load has not been correlated with patients\' psychological alterations.
CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress of outpatient patients should be taken into account in their management to improve mental health planning. This knowledge could provide comprehensive care to patients including their mental health, in the face of subsequent epidemics/pandemics.

UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of traveling populations, yet little is known about the health status of nomadic communities. This ecological study aimed to investigate the health status of the nomadic population in Fars Province, Iran, during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: Nomadic Information Registration System (NIRS) data were used to compare COVID-19 diagnostic tests, confirmed cases, referrals, hospital admissions, deaths, and vaccination coverage between the nomadic and general populations. Non-parametric chi-square test was used for data analysis.
UNASSIGNED: In Fars Province, COVID-19 diagnostic tests were performed on 2.73 % of the nomadic population and 40 % of the general population. The test positivity rate was 23.91 % for the nomadic population and 29.3 % for the general population. The case fatality ratio (CFR) for COVID-19 was 9.24 % for the nomadic population and 1.29 % for the general population. Additionally, only 41.83 % and 24.35 % of the nomadic population had received the first and second doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, respectively, which were lower than the general population\'s rates of 65.65 % and 59.71 %.
UNASSIGNED: The nomadic population in Fars Province received suboptimal COVID-19 care compared to the general population.