hospitalized

住院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前对因急性病毒性呼吸道感染而住院的免疫功能低下患者的治疗指南有限。对急性病毒性呼吸道感染患者给予IVIG的临床和经济效益知之甚少。
    目的:我们比较了接受IVIG和未接受IVIG的病毒性呼吸道感染免疫功能低下患者的临床和经济结果。
    方法:我们对2011年至2016年在两个大型学术中心因呼吸道病毒感染住院的所有患者进行了回顾性队列研究,包括年龄数据,性别,病毒种类,免疫抑制型,和收到IVIG。结果包括死亡,医院再入院,住院时间(LOS),和重症监护病房(ICU)。
    结果:共审查了270名患者的入院情况,35.6%收到IVIG。平均年龄40.6岁,50%为女性,74%为移植患者。最常见的病毒是鼻病毒(50.7%)。使用IVIG与较短的ICULOS显著相关(β=-0.534,P=0.012),住院LOS较长(β=0.887,P<0.01)。住院48小时内给予IVIG(n=229)与ICULOS较短(β=-2.08,P=0.001)和住院至少2天患者的住院LOS较短(β=-0.461,P=0.007)相关。再入院率或死亡没有显着差异。
    结论:这种双中心,回顾性队列分析是首批评估IVIG对因呼吸道病毒感染住院的免疫功能低下患者的影响的研究之一.IVIG与较短的医院和ICULOS有关,尤其是在入院后48小时内给药。
    BACKGROUND: Limited guidelines exist for treating immunocompromised patients hospitalized for acute viral respiratory infection. Little is known about clinical and economic benefits of IVIG administration in patients with acute viral respiratory infections.
    OBJECTIVE: We compared clinical and economic outcomes among immunocompromised patients hospitalized with viral respiratory infections who received IVIG to those who did not.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study on all patients hospitalized for a respiratory viral infection between 2011 and 2016 at two large academic centers including data on age, gender, virus species, immunosuppression type, and receipt of IVIG. Outcomes included death, hospital readmission, length of stay (LOS) in the hospital, and the intensive care unit (ICU).
    RESULTS: A total of 270 patient admissions were reviewed, and 35.6% received IVIG. The average age was 40.6 years, 50% were female and 74% were transplant patients. The most common virus was rhinovirus (50.7%). Use of IVIG was significantly associated with a shorter ICU LOS (β=-0.534, P=0.012), and a longer hospital LOS (β=0.887, P<0.01). IVIG administered within 48 hours of hospitalization (n=229) was associated with a shorter ICU LOS (β=-2.08, P=0.001) and a shorter hospital LOS for patients hospitalized at least 2 days (β=-0.461, P=0.007). There were no significant differences in readmission rates or death.
    CONCLUSIONS: This double-center, retrospective cohort analysis is one of the first studies to evaluate the effect of IVIG on immunocompromised patients hospitalized with respiratory viral infections. IVIG was associated with a shorter hospital and ICU LOS, especially when administered within 48 hours of admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染是全球5岁以下儿童下呼吸道感染发病和死亡的主要原因之一。鉴于此,这项研究的目的是估计尼塞维玛(单剂量,长效,抗RSV的人重组单克隆抗体)随着时间的推移,用于预防在不同护理水平下治疗的呼吸道发作。
    进行了一项前瞻性和动态的基于人群的队列研究,包括2023年4月1日至12月31日出生在马德里地区的婴儿,他们在2023年10月1日至2024年2月29日的随访期间居住在马德里地区。婴儿从接受一次剂量(50或100mg)的nirsevimab或未免疫的个体(如果他们没有接受任何剂量)的第二天起被认为是免疫的。
    初级保健有4,100次发作,1,954医院紧急情况,和509个招生,在33,859名参与者中,有82人需要重症监护。nirsevimab在预防RSV感染导致的住院方面的调整有效性在30天为93.6%(95%CI:89.7至96.1),在150天为87.6%(95%CI:67.7至95.3)。预防一次住院需要治疗的人数在30天为314.19(95%CI:306.22至327.99),在150天为24.30(95%CI:22.31至31.61)。nirsevimab在避免进入重症监护病房方面的调整有效性在30天为94.4%(95%CI:87.3至97.5),在90天为92.1%(95%CI:64.0至98.3)。nirsevimab避免初级保健咨询和医院急诊就诊的调整后有效性较低。
    用nirsevimab进行免疫接种是一种有效的措施,可以减轻各级护理中与RSV相关的护理负担,尽管在整个随访期间它都会减少。在150天时,防止住院的时间仍然很高。已经发表的其他文章也显示出很高的有效性,尽管有初步的结果,短随访期和宽置信区间。没有人检测到有效性随着时间的推移而下降。这些结果对于个体婴儿预防和免疫运动的设计非常有用。
    UNASSIGNED: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality from lower respiratory tract infections in children under 5 years of age worldwide. Given that, the objective of this study was estimate the effectiveness of nirsevimab (a single-dose, long-acting, human recombinant monoclonal antibody against RSV) over time for the prevention of respiratory episodes treated at different levels of care.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective and dynamic population-based cohort study was performed including infants born between April 1 and December 31, 2023, in the Madrid region who resided there during the follow-up period from October 1, 2023, to February 29, 2024. Infants were considered immunized from the day after receiving one dose (50 or 100 mg) of nirsevimab or nonimmunized individuals if they did not receive any dose.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 4,100 episodes of primary care, 1,954 hospital emergencies, and 509 admissions, 82 of which required intensive care in the 33,859 participants analyzed. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab in preventing hospitalization due to RSV infection was 93.6% (95% CI: 89.7 to 96.1) at 30 days and 87.6% (95% CI: 67.7 to 95.3) at 150 days. The number needed to treat to prevent one hospitalization were 314.19 (95% CI: 306.22 to 327.99) at 30 days and 24.30 (95% CI: 22.31 to 31.61) at 150 days. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab in avoiding admission to an intensive care unit was 94.4% (95% CI: 87.3 to 97.5) at 30  days and 92.1% (95% CI: 64.0 to 98.3) at 90 days. The adjusted effectiveness of nirsevimab for avoiding primary care consultations and hospital emergency visits was lower.
    UNASSIGNED: Immunization with nirsevimab is an effective measure for reducing the burden of care related to RSV at all levels of care albeit it decreases throughout follow-up. At 150 days it remained high for preventing hospital admissions. Other articles already published have also demonstrated high effectiveness although with preliminary results, short follow-up periods and wide confidence intervals. None have detected a decrease in effectiveness over time. These results can be quite useful in individual infant prevention and in the design of immunization campaigns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是导致儿童急性下呼吸道感染(ALRIs)住院的主要病原体。随着社区和学校的重新开放,在COVID-19大流行后时代,RSV的死灰复燃已成为一个主要问题。了解COVID-19流行前和流行期间天津市RSV的循环模式和基因型变异性,对2017年7月至2022年6月天津市住院儿童的19,531份鼻咽抽吸物样本进行了评价.直接免疫荧光和聚合酶链反应(PCR)用于RSV阳性样本的筛选和分型。分别。通过Sanger测序对G基因的第二高变区(HVR2)中的突变进行进一步分析。我们的结果显示,从2020年12月到2021年2月的冬季,16.46%(3,215/19,531)的样本为RSV阳性,RSV感染率延迟增加,平均RSV阳性率为35.77%(519/1,451)。具有H258Q和H266L取代的ON1,和BA9,用T290I和T312I替换,是天津每1-2年交替传播的优势菌株,中国,从2017年7月到2022年6月。此外,新颖的替换,如N296Y,K221T,N230K,V251A在BA9基因型,和L226I在ON1基因型,在COVID-19大流行期间出现。临床特征分析表明RSV-A和RSV-B组之间无明显差异。本研究为临床防治提供了理论依据。然而,未来还需要进一步研究探讨宿主对不同谱系ON1和BA9免疫应答的调控机制。
    Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main pathogen that causes hospitalization for acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRIs) in children. With the reopening of communities and schools, the resurgence of RSV in the COVID-19 post-pandemic era has become a major concern. To understand the circulation patterns and genotype variability of RSV in Tianjin before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, a total of 19,531 nasopharyngeal aspirate samples from hospitalized children in Tianjin from July 2017 to June 2022 were evaluated. Direct immunofluorescence and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used for screening RSV-positive samples and subtyping, respectively. Further analysis of mutations in the second hypervariable region (HVR2) of the G gene was performed through Sanger sequencing. Our results showed that 16.46% (3215/19,531) samples were RSV positive and a delayed increase in the RSV infection rates occurred in the winter season from December 2020 to February 2021, with the average RSV-positive rate of 35.77% (519/1451). The ON1, with H258Q and H266L substitutions, and the BA9, with T290I and T312I substitutions, are dominant strains that alternately circulate every 1-2 years in Tianjin, China, from July 2017 to June 2022. In addition, novel substitutions, such as N296Y, K221T, N230K, V251A in the BA9 genotype, and L226I in the ON1 genotype, emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis of clinical characteristics indicated no significant differences between RSV-A and RSV-B groups. This study provides a theoretical basis for clinical prevention and treatment. However, further studies are needed to explore the regulatory mechanism of host immune responses to different lineages of ON1 and BA9 in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    糖尿病目前正在接近流行病的比例,并不成比例地影响医院环境中的患者。在美国,患有糖尿病的人每年有超过1700万急诊就诊和800万入院。这些患者在医院环境中的管理是复杂的,并且与门诊环境有很大不同。所有高血糖患者都应进行糖尿病筛查,由于院内高血糖预示着更大的发病风险,死亡率,入住重症监护室,增加住院时间。然而,高血糖的定义,血糖目标,在住院患者中控制高血糖的策略可能因考虑的人群而异。此外,呈现的疾病,改变营养状况,和同时住院的药物治疗通常需要考虑调整家庭糖尿病治疗方案和/或开始新的胰岛素剂量。这篇综述文章将研究围绕住院糖尿病管理的核心概念和新兴的新文献,包括血糖目标,胰岛素给药策略,非胰岛素药物,糖尿病新技术,住院糖尿病管理团队,和出院计划策略,优化患者安全和满意度,临床结果,甚至医院的财务健康。
    Diabetes mellitus is currently approaching epidemic proportions and disproportionately affects patients in the hospital setting. In the United States, individuals living with diabetes represent over 17 million emergency department visits and 8 million admissions annually. The management of these patients in the hospital setting is complex and differs considerably from the outpatient setting. All patients with hyperglycemia should be screened for diabetes, as in-hospital hyperglycemia portends a greater risk for morbidity, mortality, admission to an intensive care unit, and increased hospital length of stay. However, the definition of hyperglycemia, glycemic targets, and strategies to manage hyperglycemia in the inpatient setting can vary greatly depending on the population considered. Moreover, the presenting illness, changing nutritional status, and concurrent hospital medications often necessitate thoughtful consideration to adjustments of home diabetes regimens and/or the initiation of new insulin doses. This review article will examine core concepts and emerging new literature surrounding inpatient diabetes management, including glycemic targets, insulin dosing strategies, noninsulin medications, new diabetes technologies, inpatient diabetes management teams, and discharge planning strategies, to optimize patient safety and satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and even hospital financial health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酒石酸瓦伦克林是烟碱乙酰胆碱受体(nAChR)的新型选择性激动剂。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定伐尼克兰在住院患者戒烟中的疗效。
    我们浏览了WebofScience等全球数据库,Embase,PubMed,科克伦,还有Scopus.使用适当的关键词发现了有关varenicline对住院患者戒烟疗效的相关研究。使用Stata软件版本14和随机效应模型荟萃分析对数据进行分析。
    九项研究符合纳入本研究的条件,总样本量为2131。一般来说,在第12周时,伐伦克林组的禁欲率显着高于安慰剂组(比值比[OR]=0.59;95%CI:053-0.65;P<0.001),24(OR=0.78;95%CI:0.72-0.84;P<0.001),52(OR=0.86;95%CI:0.80-0.92;P<0.001)。此外,第4周的持续禁欲率(OR=0.70;95%CI:019-0.54;P=0.000),12(OR=0.26;95%CI:019-0.54;P<0.001),24(OR=0.32;95%CI:019-0.53;P<0.001),和52(OR=0.32;95%CI:019-0.54;P<0.001)明显高于安慰剂组。
    根据伐尼克兰在短期和长期吸烟环境中的高疗效,并考虑到戒烟对高危住院患者的重要性,服用伐尼克兰可以被认为是这些患者的主要戒烟策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Varenicline tartrate is a new and selective agonist of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine varenicline efficacy in smoking cessation among hospitalized patients.
    UNASSIGNED: We looked through worldwide databases such as Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus. Relevant pieces of research published on varenicline efficacy on smoking cessation among hospitalized patients were discovered using proper keywords. The data were analyzed using Stata software version 14 and a random-effects model meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine studies were eligible to be included in this study, with a total sample size of 2131. Generally, the point abstinence rate was significantly greater in the varenicline group than in the placebo group at weeks 12 (odds ratio [OR]=0.59; 95% CI: 053-0.65; P<0.001), 24 (OR=0.78; 95% CI: 0.72-0.84; P<0.001), and 52 (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.80-0.92; P<0.001). Furthermore, the continuous abstinence rate for weeks 4 (OR=0.70; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P=0.000), 12 (OR=0.26; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P<0.001), 24 (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 019-0.53; P<0.001), and 52 (OR=0.32; 95% CI: 019-0.54; P<0.001) was significantly greater in the varenicline group than in the placebo group.
    UNASSIGNED: According to the high efficacy of varenicline in both short- and long-term smoking settings and considering the importance of smoking cessation in high-risk hospitalized patients, varenicline consumption could be considered as a main smoking cessation strategy in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:住院患者可能由于急性疾病而营养摄入不一致,改变饮食,或不可预测的送餐。这项研究的目的是评估将营养胰岛素管理从餐前转移到餐后的医院政策的实施是否与血糖控制或住院时间(LOS)的变化有关。
    方法:这项在社区医院进行的回顾性研究评估了三个时间段内接受营养胰岛素的成年住院患者。干预前,立即干预后,和遥远的干预后。结果包括低血糖发生率(葡萄糖≤70mg/dL),中度低血糖(<54mg/dL),严重低血糖(≤40mg/dL),严重高血糖(≥300mg/dL),每日平均葡萄糖水平,还有LOS.
    结果:队列中分析的患者天数分别为1948、1751和3244。经过多变量调整后,随着时间的推移,发生低血糖和严重低血糖的风险显著降低(分别为p=0.001和p=0.009).每日平均葡萄糖随时间增加(194.6±62.5vs196.8±65.5vs199.3±61.5mg/dL;p=0.003),但严重高血糖(p=0.10)或LOS(p=0.74)的发生率之间没有显著差异.
    结论:在全院范围内实施向餐后营养胰岛素给药的转变,可显著降低低血糖发生率,而不增加严重的高血糖。这表明了提高患者安全性的有希望的策略,但需要进一步的前瞻性随机对照试验来证实这些发现.
    OBJECTIVE: Hospitalized patients can have inconsistent nutritional intake due to acute illness, changing diet, or unpredictable meal delivery. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a hospital-wide policy shifting nutritional insulin administration from pre-meal to post-meal was associated with changes in glycemic control or length of stay (LOS).
    METHODS: This retrospective study performed at a community hospital evaluated adult inpatients receiving nutritional insulin across three time periods. pre-intervention, immediate post-intervention, and distant post-intervention. Outcomes included rates of hypoglycemia (glucose ≤ 70 mg/dL), moderate hypoglycemia (< 54 mg/dL), severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dL), severe hyperglycemia (≥ 300 mg/dL), daily mean glucose level, and LOS.
    RESULTS: The number of patient-days analyzed across the cohorts were 1948, 1751, and 3244, respectively. After multivariate adjustment, risk of developing any hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia significantly decreased over time (p = 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Daily mean glucose increased over time (194.6 ± 62.5 vs 196.8 ± 65.5 vs 199.3 ± 61.5 mg/dL; p = 0.003), but there were no significant differences among rates of severe hyperglycemia (p = 0.10) or LOS (p = 0.74).
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a hospital-wide shift to postprandial nutritional insulin administration significantly reduced hypoglycemia rates without increasing severe hyperglycemia. This suggests a promising strategy for improving patient safety, but further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:心包和胸腔积液是最近在COVID-19感染住院患者中描述的两种并发症。已经提出了几种机制,并提到SARS-CoV-2通过各种受体结合细胞表面的能力及其广泛的组织嗜性,这可能导致严重的并发症。本研究的目的是评估COVID-19感染期间心包和胸腔积液的发生率,并确定与这些并发症相关的危险因素。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性的单中心研究,包括了美国国家传染病研究所收治的346例患者。马蒂·巴尔斯博士(布加勒斯特,罗马尼亚),从2021年1月1日至5月25日,在第三波大流行期间。收集每位患者的社会人口统计学和人体测量数据。对患者进行了临床评估,生物学,并在入院48小时内进行放射学检查。患者分为3组:(1)心包积液患者-18;(2)胸腔积液患者-28;(3)没有心包/胸腔积液的患者-294。结果:应用排除标准后,对337例患者进行了分析。参与者的中位年龄为58.26±14.58岁。超过一半的住院患者有相关的呼吸衰竭(61.5%),其中2.7%患有严重形式的疾病,58.8%患有严重形式的疾病。研究组心包和胸腔积液的累积百分比为12.8%(337例中有43例患者)。心包积液的发生率为5.3%,男性受访者的频率要高出两倍。8.3%的患者出现胸腔积液。大多数患者有单侧积液(17),与11例双侧受累患者相比。根据实验室结果,心包和胸腔积液患者的C反应蛋白水平升高,红细胞沉降率,NTproBNP,中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞计数比值较高。与没有胸膜和心包积液的患者相比,有这些症状的患者出现严重或危重疾病的频率更高,住院时间更长。结论:心包和胸腔积液可使COVID-19感染复杂化。在我们的研究中,住院患者心包和胸腔积液的患病率较低,与相同的合并症以及许多临床和生物学参数有关。
    Background: Pericardial and pleural effusions are two complications recently described in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infections. There are several mechanisms that have been proposed and refer to SARS-CoV-2\'s capacity to bind to cell surfaces via various receptors and its broad tissue tropism that might cause significant complications. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the incidence of pericardial and pleural effusions during COVID-19 infection as well as to determine the risk factors associated with these complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study that included 346 patients admitted to the National Institute of Infectious Disease \"Prof. Dr. Matei Bals\" (Bucharest, Romania), from 1 January to 25 May 2021, during the third wave of the pandemic. Socio-demographic and anthropometric data were collected for each patient. The patients were evaluated clinically, biologically, and radiologically within 48 h of admission. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) patients with pericardial effusions-18; (2) patients with pleural effusions-28; (3) patients without pericardial/pleural effusions-294. Results: After exclusion criteria were applied, 337 patients were analyzed. The median age of the participants was 58.26 ± 14.58 years. More than half of the hospitalized patients had associated respiratory failure (61.5%), of which 2.7% had a critical form of the disease and 58.8% had a severe form. The cumulative percentage for pericardial and pleural effusions for the study group was 12.8% (43 patients out of 337). The prevalence of pericardial effusion was 5.3%, twice more frequent among male respondents. Pleural effusion was identified in 8.3% patients. Most patients had unilateral effusion (17), compared to 11 patients who had bilateral involvement. Based on laboratory results, patients with pericardial and pleural effusions exhibited increased levels of C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, NT proBNP, and a higher value of neutrophil/lymphocyte count ratio. In contrast to patients without pleural and pericardial effusions, those with these symptoms experienced a higher frequency of severe or critical illness and longer hospital stays. Conclusions: Pericardial and pleural effusions can complicate COVID-19 infections. In our study, the prevalence of pericardial and pleural effusions in hospitalized patients was low, being associated with the same comorbidities and a number of clinical and biological parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    说明在收集针对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的快速合成证据时遇到的挑战。
    在本文中,我们描述了在对重症COVID-19治疗的疗效和安全性进行随机对照试验(RCT)的系统文献综述(SLR)时遇到的挑战.SLR的方法有完整的描述,展示我们目标的背景。然后,我们使用SLR的结果来证明在这种情况下产生综合证据的问题。
    在此SLR期间发现了各种挑战。这些主要是符合条件的研究的研究方法的异质性的结果。患者人群的定义和结果测量结果差异很大,大多数研究表明存在较高的偏倚风险。防止对整理后的证据进行定量合成。
    合并来自RCT评估COVID-19干预措施的证据是有问题的。对于初级研究中具有高快速产出的场景,需要指导。
    UNASSIGNED: To illustrate the challenges encountered when gathering rapidly synthesized evidence in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: In this article, we describe the challenges encountered when we performed a systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of treatments for severe COVID-19. The methods of the SLR are described in full, to show the context of our objectives. Then we use the results of the SLR to demonstrate the problems of producing synthesized evidence in this setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Various challenges were identified during this SLR. These were primarily a result of heterogeneity in the study methodology of eligible studies. Definitions of the patient populations and outcome measurements were highly variable and the majority of studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, preventing quantitative synthesis of the collated evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: Consolidating evidence from RCTs evaluating COVID-19 interventions was problematic. Guidance is needed for scenarios with high rapid output in primary research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尿酸(UA)水平升高与急性和慢性疾病有关,这可能会影响儿科住院患者的预后。然而,在住院儿童和青少年中,UA水平与住院时间(LOS)和死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚.因此,本研究的目的是评估住院儿童和青少年中血清UA水平与住院死亡率和长期LOS的相关性.
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,涉及128名18岁以下的患者,2014年1月至2018年12月期间入住三级医院。在住院结果(出院或死亡)前3天平均评估UA水平。Logistic回归用于确定UA与延长的LOS(定义为住院超过30天)的相关性,而Cox回归多变量分析用于评估UA作为院内死亡率的预测因子.
    结果:UA水平与LOS延长呈负相关。具体来说,UA水平每增加1毫克/分升,LOS延长的几率降低了31%(OR=0.69;95%CI:0.50-0.95).此外,UA水平升高的个体出现LOS延长的几率较低(OR=0.23;95%CI:0.08~0.66).然而,UA水平与住院死亡率无关(HR=1.63;95%CI:0.94-2.82)。
    结论:在儿童和青少年中,血清UA与LOS呈负相关,但未观察到与院内死亡率相关.
    OBJECTIVE: Elevated uric acid (UA) levels have been associated with acute and chronic diseases, which could affect the prognosis of pediatric hospitalized patients. However, the association of UA levels with length of hospital stay (LOS) and mortality in hospitalized children and adolescents remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the association of serum UA levels with in-hospital mortality and prolonged LOS in hospitalized children and adolescents.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving 128 patients under 18 years of age, admitted to a tertiary-care hospital between January 2014 and December 2018. UA levels were assessed with an average of 3 days before the in-hospital outcome (discharge or death). Logistic regression was used to determine the association of UA with prolonged LOS (defined as over 30 days of hospitalization), while Cox regression multivariate analysis was employed to assess UA as a predictor of in-hospital mortality.
    RESULTS: UA levels showed an inverse association with prolonged LOS. Specifically, for every 1 mg/dL increase in UA level, the odds of experiencing prolonged LOS decreased by 31% (OR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.50-0.95). Additionally, individuals with elevated UA levels had lower odds of prolonged LOS (OR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.66). However, UA levels were not associated with in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.94-2.82).
    CONCLUSIONS: Serum UA was inversely associated with LOS among children and adolescents, but no association was observed with in-hospital mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在65岁以上的老年人队列中进行了一项前瞻性观察研究(n=329),入住三级医院的急性医疗单位(AMU),描述和比较特征,包括虚弱状态和临床结局。多变量模型比较了有和没有癌症史的老年人,以确定与虚弱和虚弱前期相关的特征。使用调整的Poisson回归模型比较两组之间的住院时间(LOS)。大约五分之一(22%)的队列有癌症史。最常见的癌症类型是前列腺(n=20),乳房(n=13),肺(n=8)和胃肠道(n=8)。在有或没有癌症病史的患者中,衰弱前/衰弱的患病率没有差异(58%vs.57%,p>0.05)。在有癌症病史的患者中,虚弱/虚弱与多重用药(OR8.26,95%CI:1.74至39.2)和营养不良(OR8.91,95%CI:2.15至36.9)相关。调整后的分析显示,有癌症病史的老年人比没有癌症病史的老年人长LOS的风险高24%(IRR1.24,95%CI1.10至1.41,p<0.001)。AMU的临床医生应该意识到,与没有癌症史的老年人相比,有较长的LOS的风险更高。
    A prospective observational study was conducted in a cohort of older adults ≥65 years (n = 329), admitted to the acute medical unit (AMU) of a tertiary hospital, to describe and compare characteristics including frailty status and clinical outcomes. Multivariable models compared older adults with and without a history of cancer to determine characteristics associated with frailty and pre-frailty. An adjusted Poisson regression model was used to compare the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two groups. About one-fifth (22%) of the cohort had a history of cancer. The most common cancer types were prostate (n = 20), breast (n = 13), lung (n = 8) and gastrointestinal (n = 8). There was no difference in the prevalence of pre-frailty/frailty among patients with or without a history of cancer (58% vs. 57%, p > 0.05). Pre-frailty/frailty was associated with polypharmacy (OR 8.26, 95% CI: 1.74 to 39.2) and malnutrition (OR 8.91, 95% CI: 2.15 to 36.9) in patients with a history of cancer. Adjusted analysis revealed that the risk of having a longer LOS was 24% higher in older adults with a history of cancer than those without (IRR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.41, p < 0.001). Clinicians in the AMU should be aware that older adults with a history of cancer have a higher risk of a longer LOS compared to those without.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号