hazards

Hazards
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不同年龄的绵羊和山羊可能必须在农场被杀死,而不是为了屠宰(屠宰被定义为供人类食用)而单独(即在农场杀死非生产性,受伤或绝症动物)或大规模(即为疾病控制目的和其他情况而减少人口,如环境污染和灾害管理)屠宰场外。该意见的目的是评估与在农场杀死绵羊和山羊有关的危害和福利后果。整个杀死程序分为第1阶段(杀死前)-包括以下过程:(i)处理动物并将其移至杀死地点,以及(ii)在使用杀死方法和第2阶段之前限制动物-包括击倒和杀死动物。绵羊和山羊的捕杀方法分为三类:(1)机械,(2)电注射和(3)致死注射。确定了绵羊和山羊在每个过程中可能经历的福利后果(例如处理压力,在约束过程中限制运动和组织损伤)和基于动物的措施(ABM)来评估它们。在使用杀死方法期间,绵羊和山羊会经历痛苦和恐惧,如果他们是无效的惊呆或如果他们恢复意识。与意识状态相关的ABM可用于间接评估疼痛和恐惧。意见中包括了针对每种杀戮方法的意识的ABM流程图。为每个过程确定了可能的福利危害,以及它们的起源和相关的预防和纠正措施。联系危险的结果表,福利后果,ABMs,起源,针对每个过程制定了预防和纠正措施。提出了缓解措施,以最大程度地减少福利后果。
    Sheep and goats of different ages may have to be killed on-farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually (i.e. on-farm killing of unproductive, injured or terminally ill animals) or on a large scale (i.e. depopulation for disease control purposes and for other situations, such as environmental contamination and disaster management) outside the slaughterhouses. The purpose of this opinion was to assess the hazards and welfare consequences associated with the on-farm killing of sheep and goats. The whole killing procedure was divided into Phase 1 (pre-killing) - that included the processes (i) handling and moving the animals to the killing place and (ii) restraint of the animals before application of the killing methods and Phase 2 - that included stunning and killing of the animals. The killing methods for sheep and goats were grouped into three categories: (1) mechanical, (2) electrical and (3) lethal injection. Welfare consequences that sheep and goats may experience during each process were identified (e.g. handling stress, restriction of movements and tissue lesions during restraint) and animal-based measures (ABMs) to assess them were proposed. During application of the killing method, sheep and goats will experience pain and fear if they are ineffectively stunned or if they recover consciousness. ABMs related to the state of consciousness can be used to indirectly assess pain and fear. Flowcharts including ABMs for consciousness specific to each killing method were included in the opinion. Possible welfare hazards were identified for each process, together with their origin and related preventive and corrective measures. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, ABMs, origins, preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences were proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于工作场所的条件,例如医院不安全和不卫生的工作环境,医院环卫工人(SWs)暴露于许多职业危害。因此,知道幅度,职业危害暴露的类型和来源及其决定因素对于进一步缓解非常重要。
    方法:在公立医院进行基于医院的横断面研究设计,埃塞俄比亚东部从5月1日至8月30日,2023年。809名SWs参加。将数据输入到用于分析的Epi数据版本3.1和Stata17MP版本中。描述性分析用于描述数据。同时,探索了多水平逻辑回归,以确定个体水平(模型1)中结局与独立性之间的关联,在医院(模式2)和两者的组合(模式3)。报告了模型2和模型3的粗比值比(COR)和调整后比值比(AOR)。报告了P值<0.05的具有95%置信区间(CI)的AOR的变量。
    结果:在809SWs中,729人(90.11%)回答。SWs中自我报告的职业危害暴露的总体程度为63.65%(95%CI0.60-0.67)。其中,生物,化学,人体工程学危害占82.44%,74.76%,70.92%,分别。多水平Logistic回归显示,具有社会认可度(AOR:0.37,95%CI0.14,0.91),中立态度(AOR:0.48,95%CI0.17,1.41)与消极态度相比。该模型还发现,与非监督的SWs相比,监督的SWs可以将职业危害暴露的可能性降低50%倍(AOR:0.50,95%CI0.18,1.38)。最终模型预测卫生工作者从医院到医院的职业危害暴露变化为26.59%。
    结论:结论是医院卫生工作者正面临生物,化学,符合人体工程学,物理,心理,机械,和电气危险。这项研究的发现预测,对他们的环境不满意,每天工作8小时以上,对工作场所风险的消极态度和监督不足可能是这些群体中职业危害暴露可能性的促成因素。因此,研究表明,如果医院实施风险评估和安全管理(RASM)模型,可以降低这些危险风险,其中包括多模式策略,指标和三方哲学。
    BACKGROUND: Hospital sanitation workers (SWs) are exposed to numerous occupational hazards due to workplace conditions such as unsafe and unhygienic working environment in the hospitals. Therefore, knowing magnitude, types and source of occupational hazard exposures with their determinants are very significant for further mitigations.
    METHODS: Hospital based cross-sectional study design was conducted in public hospitals, eastern Ethiopia from 1st May to August 30th, 2023. 809 SWs participated. Data was entered into Epi Data Version 3.1 and Stata 17MP version used for analysis. Descriptive analysis was applied to describe the data. While, multilevel logistic regression was explored to determine the association between outcome and independents among at individual level (model 1), at hospitals (model 2) and combination of the two (model 3). The crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for models 2 and 3 were reported. Variables with an AOR with a 95% confidence interval (CI) at a p-value < 0.05 were reported.
    RESULTS: Out of 809 SWs, 729 (90.11%) responded. The overall magnitude of self-reported occupational hazard exposures among SWs was 63.65% (95% CI 0.60-0.67). Of this, biological, chemical, and ergonomic hazards accounted for 82.44%, 74.76%, and 70.92%, respectively. The multilevel logistic regression shows that having social recognition (AOR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.14, 0.91), neutral attitude (AOR: 0.48, 95% CI 0.17, 1.41) as compared to negative attitude. The model also found that SWs those supervised could reduce the likelihood of occupational hazard exposures by 50% times (AOR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.18, 1.38) as compared to non-supervised SWs. The final model predicted the variation of occupational hazard exposures among sanitary workers from the hospitals to hospitals was 26.59%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The concluded that hospital sanitary workers are facing biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychological, mechanical, and electrical hazards. This study\'s findings predicted that dissatisfied with their environment, working more than 8 hr per a day,  a negative attitude towards workplace risks and inadequate supervision may serve as contributing factors for the likelihood of occupational hazard exposures among these groups. Thus, the study suggested that hospitals could reduce these hazard risks if they implement the Risk Assessment and Safety Management (RASM) model, which includes multi-modal strategies, indicators and tripartite philosophy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    公司的风险评估和管理在任何领域的预防部分都发挥着重要作用。在职业健康与安全(OHS)领域,其不一致或不正确的应用直接影响员工的生活和健康。在一些公司,即使在今天,它没有得到适当的实施,也没有使用适当的程序和方法。本文讨论了OHS领域工业环境中风险评估的逐步程序的开发。
    模型的主要部分及其步骤介绍了在风险评估领域对500家小型和微型企业样本进行调查的部分结果,以及根据主要调查结果制定的系统程序。调查仅涵盖建筑企业,制造,运输和储存以及农业,林业和渔业部门,这也是一个重要的统计特征。在受访者的结构中,统计特征,如:企业规模,部门,按工作区域确定。调查仅包括按员工人数划分的企业-1至9名员工的微型企业和10至49名员工的小型企业。
    方法的新元素被集成到开发的系统程序中,随后在同一位置的一家公司的7家工厂中进行了验证。由7名成员组成的专家组验证了所开发模型的应用,奇数,并应用了开发的清单和风险登记册。在核实的基础上,模型,核对表和风险登记册得到纠正.此外,还使用了评分方法和风险矩阵,但是它们不包含新的元素。
    该程序今天仍在使用中,并且对员工进行了使用培训。在制定的方法和检查表的基础上,该程序已转换为欧洲OiRA工具,可供整个欧盟的公司使用。
    UNASSIGNED: Risk assessment and management in companies plays a significant role in the prevention section of any field. In the field of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), its inconsistent or incorrect application has a direct impact on the life and health of employees. In some companies, even today, it is not properly implemented and adequate procedures and methods are not used. The article discusses the development of a step-by-step procedure for risk assessment in industrial environments in the area of OHS.
    UNASSIGNED: Main parts of the model and its steps present the partial results of a survey conducted on a sample of 500 small and micro enterprises in the field of risk assessment and the systematic procedure developed following the main survey results. The survey covered only enterprises located in the construction, manufacturing, transport and storage and agriculture, forestry and fishing sectors, which is also a significant statistical feature. Within the structure of respondents, statistical features such as: size of enterprise, sector, region by work are identified. Only enterprises with size by number of employees - micro enterprises from 1 to 9 employees and small enterprises from 10 to 49 employees - were included for the survey.
    UNASSIGNED: New elements of the methods were integrated into the developed systematic procedure, which was subsequently validated in 7 plants of the one company on the same position. The application of the developed model was verified by an expert group consisting of 7 members, an odd number, and the developed checklists and risk register were applied. On the basis of the verification, the model, checklist and risk register were corrected. In addition, the scoring method and the risk matrix were also used, but they did not contain new elements.
    UNASSIGNED: The procedure is still in use today and employees have been trained to use it. On the basis of the developed methodology and the Checklist, the procedure has been transposed into the European OiRA tool and can be used by companies throughout the European Union.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿科COVID-19流行病学和与不良结局相关的因素-死亡率,需要有创机械通气,ICU入院,基本上没有研究。我们描述了菲律宾儿童COVID-19患者的临床人口统计学特征,并确定了与不良结局相关的因素。
    这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究了2020年4月至2021年8月在马尼拉的COVID-19三级转诊医院进行的180例0-18岁的SARS-CoV-2住院确诊病例,国家首都地区。使用卡方或Fisher精确检验确定粗关联;使用Mann-Whitney检验比较中位数。使用Cox比例风险回归分析确定预测死亡率的因素。幸存者功能在图中描绘。
    约41.67%患有轻度疾病,58.33%为男性,39.4%,0-4岁,69.44%有至少一种合并症。约9.44%死亡(调整后,每1000名患者天有9.2人死亡,95%CI5.5%-15.2%),17.78%需要有创机械通气,20%需要入住ICU。独立地,重症COVID-19(HRc11.51,95%CI3.23,41.06),撤回(HRc10.30,95%CI3.27,32.47),鼻翼耀斑(HRc4.39,95%CI1.53,12.58),紫癜(HRc4.39,95%CI1.72,14.11),呼吸困难(HRc7.99,95%CI2.25,28.71),吸/食欲差(HRc4.46,95%CI1.59,12.40),铁蛋白(HRc1.01,95%CI1.00,1.01),IL-6(HRc1.01,95%CI1.00,1.01),aPTT(HRc1.05,95%CI1.01,1.10),IVIg(HRc4.00,95%CI1.07,14.92)和皮质类固醇(HRc6.01,95%CI2.04,17.67)是死亡率的显著危险因素。在调整后的Cox分析中,仅撤回(HRa34.96,95%CI3.36,363.79),癫痫发作(HRa9.98,95%CI1.76,56.55),和皮质类固醇(HRa8.21,95%CI1.12,60.38)与死亡率显着相关,而鼻翼耀斑似乎具有保护性(HRa0.10,95%CI0.01,0.95)。一些临床特征与不良结局一致相关。
    大多数住院儿科COVID-19患者非常年轻,男性,患有轻度疾病,至少有一种合并症.死亡率,有创机械通气,ICU入院率相对较低。除了似乎是保护性的鼻翼耀斑,撤回,癫痫发作,糖皮质激素的使用与不良结局相关.
    UNASSIGNED: Pediatric COVID-19 epidemiology and factors associated with adverse outcomes - mortality, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission, are largely unstudied. We described the clinico-demographic characteristics of Filipino pediatric COVID-19 patients and determined the factors associated with adverse outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cohort study of 180 hospitalized SARS-CoV-2-confirmed cases 0-18 years old from April 2020 to August 2021 in a tertiary COVID-19 referral hospital in Manila, National Capital Region. Crude associations were determined using chi-squared or Fisher\'s exact tests; and medians were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Factors predictive of mortality were determined using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survivor functions were depicted in graphs.
    UNASSIGNED: About 41.67% had mild disease, 58.33% were males, 39.4% aged 0-4 years, and 69.44% had at least one comorbidity. About 9.44% died (adjusted 9.2 persons per 1000 patient-days, 95% CI 5.5%-15.2%), 17.78% needed invasive mechanical ventilation, and 20% needed ICU admission. Independently, severe-critical COVID-19 (HRc 11.51, 95% CI 3.23, 41.06), retractions (HRc 10.30, 95% CI 3.27, 32.47), alar flaring (HRc 4.39, 95% CI 1.53, 12.58), cyanosis (HRc 4.39, 95% CI 1.72, 14.11), difficulty of breathing (HRc 7.99, 95% CI 2.25, 28.71), poor suck/appetite (HRc 4.46, 95% CI 1.59, 12.40), ferritin (HRc 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01), IL-6 (HRc 1.01, 95% CI 1.00, 1.01), aPTT (HRc 1.05, 95% CI 1.01, 1.10), IVIg (HRc 4.00, 95% CI 1.07, 14.92) and corticosteroid (HRc 6.01, 95% CI 2.04, 17.67) were significant hazards for mortality. In adjusted Cox analysis, only retractions (HRa 34.96, 95% CI 3.36, 363.79), seizure (HRa 9.98, 95% CI 1.76, 56.55), and corticosteroids (HRa 8.21, 95% CI 1.12, 60.38) were significantly associated with mortality while alar flaring appeared to be protective (HRa 0.10, 95% CI 0.01, 0.95). Several clinical characteristics were consistently associated with adverse outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Majority of hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients were very young, males, had mild disease, and had at least one comorbidity. Mortality, invasive mechanical ventilation, and ICU admission were relatively low. Except for alar flaring which appeared to be protective, retractions, seizure, and use of corticosteroids were associated with adverse outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Occupational medicine is an essential branch of preventive medicine that aims to protect the health of workers in the workplace. Any work situation exposes the worker to occupational hazards. The three levels of prevention applied in occupational medicine make it possible, together, to control risks. Primary prevention aims to prevent the occurrence of damage related to occupational risks, secondary prevention aims to early detect work-related health problems and in tertiary prevention, the objective is to limit the consequences of occupational risks or diseases already developed. It is not always possible to completely eliminate an occupational hazard. Regular medical examinations, at a frequency appropriate to the risks identified, meet this objective and therefore make it possible to detect work-related health problems or problems that could influence work. A proactive approach focused on prevention helps to reduce occupational risks, prevent work-related diseases, and to promote a healthy and safe work environment for all.
    La médecine du travail est une branche essentielle de la médecine préventive qui vise à protéger la santé des travailleurs sur leur lieu de travail. Toute situation de travail expose le travailleur à des dangers professionnels. Les trois niveaux de prévention appliqués en médecine du travail permettent, ensemble, de maîtriser les risques. La prévention primaire vise à empêcher l’apparition des dommages liés aux risques professionnels, la prévention secondaire vise à détecter précocement les problèmes de santé liés au travail et en prévention tertiaire, l’objectif est de limiter les conséquences des risques professionnels ou des maladies déjà développées. Il n’est pas toujours possible de supprimer complètement un risque professionnel. Les examens médicaux réguliers, à une périodicité adaptée aux risques identifiés, répondent à cet objectif et permettent donc de détecter les éventuels problèmes de santé liés au travail ou qui pourraient influencer le travail. Une approche proactive axée sur la prévention contribue à réduire les risques professionnels, à prévenir les maladies liées au travail, et à promouvoir un environnement de travail sain et sécurisé pour tous.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前发表的自杀案例调查分析表明,工作或工作条件导致10%-13%的自杀死亡。然而,工作可能增加自杀风险的方式是流行病学研究的不发达领域。在这篇评论中,我们从职业健康和安全的角度提出了与工作有关的自杀的定义,并审查有关与工作有关的自杀原因的基于案例调查和流行病学的证据。我们确定了六大类与工作相关的潜在自杀原因,它们是:(1)工作场所化学品,物理,和心理社会暴露;(2)暴露于工作中的创伤;(3)通过工作获得自杀手段;(4)暴露于高污名化的工作环境;(5)暴露于促进极端工作取向的规范环境;(6)与工作有关的伤害或疾病引起的不良经历。我们以潜在的与工作相关的原因的模式总结了当前的证据,这些原因也可以应用于工作场所风险评估和自杀案例调查。这些发现对政策和实践有许多影响。存在各种基于原则和证据的自杀预防工作场所干预策略,其中一些已被证明可以提高预防自杀的知识,减少污名,加强帮助行为,在某些情况下甚至可能降低自杀率。工作场所自杀预防的普遍做法,然而,过分强调以个人和疾病为导向的干预措施,很少注意解决可能增加自杀风险的工作条件。我们得出的结论是,工作场所自杀预防要充分发挥其预防潜力,就需要更加强调改善工作条件。
    Previously published analyses of suicide case investigations suggest that work or working conditions contribute to 10%-13% of suicide deaths. Yet, the way in which work may increase suicide risk is an underdeveloped area of epidemiologic research. In this Commentary, we propose a definition of work-related suicide from an occupational health and safety perspective, and review the case investigation-based and epidemiologic evidence on work-related causes of suicide. We identified six broad categories of potential work-related causes of suicide, which are: (1) workplace chemical, physical, and psychosocial exposures; (2) exposure to trauma on the job; (3) access to means of suicide through work; (4) exposure to high-stigma work environments; (5) exposure to normative environments promoting extreme orientation to work; and (6) adverse experiences arising from work-related injury or illness. We summarise current evidence in a schema of potential work-related causes that can also be applied in workplace risk assessment and suicide case investigations. There are numerous implications of these findings for policy and practice. Various principle- and evidence-based workplace intervention strategies for suicide prevention exist, some of which have been shown to improve suicide-prevention literacy, reduce stigma, enhance helping behaviours, and in some instances maybe even reduce suicide rates. Prevailing practice in workplace suicide prevention, however, overly emphasises individual- and illness-directed interventions, with little attention directed to addressing the working conditions that may increase suicide risk. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on improving working conditions will be required for workplace suicide prevention to reach its full preventive potential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:印度的建筑业严重依赖无组织的工人,他们往往缺乏足够的安全措施,使他们面临重大的事故和伤害风险。目的是确定建筑工人的风险认知,探索他们的安全实践,主持人,和障碍。
    方法:采用了具有收敛并行设计(QUANQual)的混合方法方法。定量链包括对加尔各答五个选定市政病房的10个建筑工地的203名随机选择的建筑建筑工人进行面对面采访。与社会人口统计学有关的问题,职业特征,风险感知,和安全实践。定性部门涉及关键的线人访谈,以解开影响安全实践和非参与者观察的促进者和障碍。
    结果:由于灰尘引起的呼吸问题的感知风险,承受负荷的痛苦,slips,绊倒或跌倒,与热有关的疾病在中高类别中占64.0%,58.6%,39.9%,36.5%的研究参与者,分别。然而,这些领域的安全措施属于良好做法类别,占6.9%,4.9%,54.2%,和34.5%的工人。从定性的手臂来看,很明显,PPE的可用性,有利的环境,和工人友好型技术的可用性可能是安全实践的重要预测因素。还确定了由于不适和支出而导致的时间限制和可行性等障碍。
    结论:尽管存在高风险,建筑工人的安全措施并不一贯良好。进一步的研究对于提高印度无组织工人的健康和安全至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The construction industry in India heavily relies on unorganized workers, who often lack adequate access to safety measures, placing them at significant risk of accidents and injuries. The objective was to determine risk perceptions of construction workers, and explore their safety practices, facilitators, and barriers.
    METHODS: A mixed-methods approach with a convergent parallel design (QUAN + qual) was undertaken. Quantitative strand included face-to-face interviews with 203 randomly selected building construction workers from 10 construction sites in five selected municipal wards in Kolkata. Questions pertained to socio-demographics, occupational characteristics, risk perception, and safety practices. The qualitative arm involved key informant interviews to unravel the facilitators and barriers affecting safety practices and nonparticipant observation.
    RESULTS: The perceived risk for respiratory problems due to dust, pain from carrying loads, slips, trips or falls, and heat-related illnesses was in the medium- to high category for 64.0%, 58.6%, 39.9%, and 36.5% of the study participants, respectively. However, the safety practices for these respective domains were in the good practice category for 6.9%, 4.9%, 54.2%, and 34.5% of the workers. From the qualitative arm, it was evident that availability of PPE, a conducive environment, and availability of worker-friendly technology could be important predictors of safety practices. Barriers such as time constraints and feasibility due to discomfort and expenditure were also identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite high-risk perception, safety practices were not consistently good among construction workers. Further research is crucial to enhance the health and safety of unorganized workers in India.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:兽医,兽医护士和兽医学生在各种环境中工作和培训,并暴露于广泛的危害。
    目的:(1)比较兽医之间的健康和安全事件发生率和伤害,兽医护士和兽医学生。(2)调查澳大利亚兽医工作场所存在的健康和安全隐患控制。
    方法:横断面研究,使用在线问卷。
    方法:将问卷的匿名链接分发给澳大利亚兽医,兽医护士和兽医学生。
    结果:共有494名兽医,484名兽医护士和212名兽医学生完成了调查。事件和伤害很常见,特别是与锐器有关的伤害和动物咬伤。澳大利亚兽医护士和兽医以相似的速度经历了所研究的事件。兽医学生经历了一些事件和伤害的比率高于兽医和兽医护士,包括中暑,体温过低,晒伤,电击,失去意识,被动物和农场设备撞伤或推倒。在报告的工作场所危险控制中,最常见的是急救箱,安全会议最不常见。兽医护士接受Q热和狂犬病疫苗的频率远低于兽医和兽医学生。
    结论:这项研究表明,澳大利亚兽医部门的职业健康和安全标准需要改进。兽医和兽医护士获得许多必需的和关键的工作场所健康和安全控制的机会不理想。建议提高兽医学生的健康和安全培训标准,鉴于某些事件和伤害的发生率较高。
    BACKGROUND: Veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students work and train in a variety of environments and are exposed to a wide range of hazards.
    OBJECTIVE: (1) To compare the rate of health and safety incidents and injuries between veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students. (2) To investigate the health and safety hazard controls present in Australian veterinary workplaces.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study, using an online questionnaire.
    METHODS: Anonymous links to the questionnaire were disseminated to Australian veterinarians, veterinary nurses and veterinary students.
    RESULTS: A total of 494 veterinarians, 484 veterinary nurses and 212 veterinary students completed the survey. Incidents and injuries were common, particularly sharps-related injuries and animal bites. Australian veterinary nurses and veterinarians experienced the studied incidents at similar rates to each other. Veterinary students experienced some incidents and injuries at rates higher than both veterinarians and veterinary nurses, including heatstroke, hypothermia, sunburn, electric shock, loss of consciousness, being rammed or pushed over by an animal and farm equipment injuries. Of the workplace hazard controls reported, first aid boxes were most commonly present, and safety meetings occurred least commonly. Veterinary nurses received Q fever and rabies vaccines much less frequently than veterinarians and veterinary students.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that improvements need to be made to the occupational health and safety standards in the Australian veterinary sector. Veterinarians and veterinary nurses had suboptimal rates of access to many of the required and critical workplace health and safety controls. Improvements to the standard of health and safety training of veterinary students are indicated, given their higher rates of certain incidents and injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    喜马拉雅森林正面临一系列威胁,这使得保护工作具有挑战性。使用混合方法方法,这项研究调查了BuxaTigerReserve(BTR)对生物多样性保护的威胁,喜马拉雅东部山麓脆弱的生态系统。研究发现,在1990年至2021年之间,BTR经历了夏季气温上升和年降水量减少,导致森林干燥,缺水,森林火灾。洪水等自然灾害,山洪暴发,地震,山体滑坡也对野生动物栖息地造成了严重破坏。土地利用和土地覆盖的变化,包括侵占,基础设施建设,薪材收藏,和放牧实践,也被确定为生态系统改变的重要驱动因素。此外,狩猎和偷猎也成为保护区野生动物种群的威胁。通过采用层次分析法(AHP),这项研究确定了土地利用的变化,基础设施建设,气候变化,放牧的牲畜,和薪材收集对BTR中的植物保护结果构成重大威胁,在基础设施建设的同时,气候变化,放牧的牲畜,森林火灾是保护区野生动物保护成果的主要威胁。研究建议对土地使用做法进行规管,促进当地社区的可持续生计,有效的保护策略,以及公众意识和教育计划,以促进生物多样性保护的价值。
    The Himalayan forests are facing a range of threats, which are making conservation efforts challenging. Using a mixed-method approach, this study investigated the threats to biodiversity conservation in Buxa Tiger Reserve (BTR), a fragile ecosystem in the Eastern Himalayan foothills. The study found that between 1990 and 2021, BTR experienced rising summer temperatures and decreasing annual precipitation, contributing to forest dryness, water scarcity, and forest fires. Natural disasters such as floods, flash floods, earthquakes, and landslides also caused significant damage to wildlife habitats. Changes in land use and land cover, including encroachment, infrastructure development, fuelwood collection, and grazing practices, were also identified as significant drivers of ecosystem alteration. Besides, hunting and poaching also emerged as threats to wildlife populations in the reserve. By employing the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the study determined that land use change, infrastructure development, climate change, livestock grazing, and fuelwood collection pose significant threats to flora conservation outcomes in BTR, while infrastructure development, climate change, livestock grazing, and forest fires are the primary threats to wildlife conservation outcomes in the reserve. The study recommends the regulation of land use practices, promotion of sustainable livelihoods for local communities, effective conservation strategies, and public awareness and education programs to promote the value of biodiversity conservation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号