BACKGROUND: It has been reported that higher surgeon experience leads to better patient outcomes. In this study, we look at surgeon experience and its association with postoperative outcomes and variation among the practice of surgeons performing paraesophageal hernia repairs (PEH).
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1155 patients who underwent PEH repair at a single institution (2010-2023). Surgeon experience was defined as the number of surgeries performed per surgeon and was split using the median surgeries (n = 100), with surgeons performing at or above the median categorized as high-experience and below the median as low-experience surgeons. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to test correlation between surgeon experience and variables, including demographics and intra- and post-operative outcomes.
RESULTS: High-experience surgeons performed more elective cases (93.4% vs 85.5%), but low-experience surgeons operated more on emergent (2.7% vs 0.9%), semi-elective (2.3% vs 1.4%), and urgent cases (9.5% vs 4.3%). Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients who were older (67.5 vs 63.2 years, p < 0.001) and had an increased risk of CVD (72.9% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001). Intraoperative OR time was considerably less for high-experience surgeons (115.8 vs 172.9 min, p < 0.001). Low-experience surgeons had increased risk of intra-operative complications (4.5% vs 1.8%, p = 0.021) and post-op pneumonia within 30 days (1.8% vs 0.3%). However, long-term outcomes such as hernia recurrence (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.78-1.54) and redo-operations for hiatal hernia (OR: 1.10, CI: 0.65-1.75) were similar for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: High-experience surgeons perform more complex revisional surgeries in less time with fewer complications. Low-experience surgeons operated more on patients with higher comorbidities but had significantly higher OR times. Long-term results of recurrence and redo-operations were comparable. These variations suggest that high-experience surgeons are more efficient while operating on more complex cases. These findings have pivotal implications to facilitate mentorship and education among less-experienced surgeons.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disorder that usually presents with heartburn. GERD is diagnosed clinically, but most patients are misdiagnosed due to atypical presentations. The increased use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has provided multiple ways of diagnosing and treating patients accurately. In this review, multiple studies in which AI models were used to diagnose GERD are discussed. According to the studies, using AI models helped to diagnose GERD in patients accurately. AI, although considered one of the most potent emerging aspects of medicine with its accuracy in patient diagnosis, presents limitations of its own, which explains why healthcare providers may hesitate to use AI in patient care. The challenges and limitations should be addressed before AI is fully incorporated into the healthcare system.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition that affects a significant portion of the Western population. Despite its benign pathophysiology, it has the potential to cause serious complications over time, ranging from conditions that are benign, premalignant, and/or malignant. Traditional treatment options include lifestyle measures, anti-secretory medications (e.g., proton pump inhibitor (PPI)), and surgical options (e.g., Nissen and Toupet fundoplication). However, recent studies have revealed long-term side effects of anti-secretory medications. Moreover, surgical options, though effective, are considered invasive and associated with potential complications. In the current age of ongoing research in minimally invasive options, endoscopic treatment of GERD has become popular. As a result, procedures such as radiofrequency treatment and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) have gained FDA approval and are currently being covered by most insurance. In this review article, we will discuss pre-procedural workup, appropriate patient selection, advantages, disadvantages, procedure techniques, and follow-up of patients who undergo various endoscopic treatments for GERD. In addition, we will review the short and long-term success of these techniques in improving quality of life, use of PPI, and improvement in symptoms considering published data in high-quality peer-reviewed journals.

Background Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the most common infectious causes of healthcare-associated diarrhea and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is notable for its high prevalence, variety of clinical presentations, and underrecognized morbidity. It is widely treated with acid suppression, both with over-the-counter and prescription medications. There are no studies evaluating the impact of GERD on CDI hospitalization. In this study, we aimed to analyze the influence of concomitant GERD on patients hospitalized for CDI enterocolitis. Methodology This was a retrospective, observational study where we extracted data from 2016 to 2020 from the National Inpatient Sample database. We included all patients hospitalized with a primary discharge diagnosis of CDI with or without a secondary diagnosis of GERD. We compared the demographics, comorbidities, and in-hospital outcomes between these two groups. Results This study identified 239,603 hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of CDI. Of these, 67,000 (28%) had a concurrent diagnosis of GERD. Patients with GERD had a higher prevalence of hypertension (41% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.01), hyperlipidemia (50% vs. 36.5%, p < 0.01), obesity (13.7% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.01), coronary artery disease (24.4% vs. 19.6%, p < 0.01), and chronic kidney disease (20.7% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.01). Notably, inpatient mortality was lower in CDI hospitalizations with GERD (0.66% vs. 1.46%, p < 0.01). The total hospital charge was reduced in the CDI with GERD group in comparison to the CDI without GERD group (39,599 vs. 43,589, p < 0.01). The length of hospital stay was similar between the two groups (5.3 vs. 5.4 days, p = 0.07). Regarding complications, CDI hospitalizations with GERD demonstrated lower rates of hypovolemic shock (0.5% vs. 0.73%, p = 0.06), septic shock (0.6% vs. 1.05%, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (1.48% vs. 2.04%, p < 0.01), intestinal perforation (0.008% vs. 0.16%, p = 0.03), and lactic acidosis (0.008% vs. 0.16%, p = 0.03). Conversely, CDI patients with GERD had a higher rate of ileus (2.66% vs. 2.16%, p < 0.01). Conclusions Patients with CDI and concurrent GERD exhibited favorable in-hospital outcomes in terms of complication rates, mortality, and total hospital charges. Further research is required to comprehensively explore and validate these findings.

OBJECTIVE: To observe the effect of acupuncture on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on the \"heart-stomach connection\" theory, and to explore its possible mechanisms.
METHODS: Seventy patients with GERD were randomly divided into an acupuncture group (35 cases, 2 cases dropped out) and a medication group (35 cases, 1 case dropped out). The patients in the acupuncture group received acupuncture at bilateral Shenmen (HT 7), Neiguan (PC 6), Burong (ST 19), Tianshu (ST 25), Zusanli (ST 36), Gongsun (SP 4), and Zhongwan (CV 12), with needles retained for 30 min, every other day, three times a week. The patients in the medication group were treated with oral omeprazole capsules, once daily, 20 mg each time. Both groups were treated for 8 weeks. Before and after treatment, the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ), GERD-quality of life scale (GERD-QOL), Hamilton depression scale-24 (HAMD-24), Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS), and Zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were observed. Serum levels of gastrointestinal hormones (gastrin [GAS], motilin [MTL], and vasoactive intestinal peptide [VIP]) were measured, and the clinical efficacy of both groups was evaluated. Correlation between pre-treatment GERDQ score and GERD-QOL score, HAMD-24 score, SDS score, and SAS score was analyzed.
RESULTS: After treatment, the scores of GERDQ, HAMD-24, SDS, and SAS were decreased (P<0.001) and the scores of GERD-QOL were increased (P<0.001), serum levels of GAS and MTL were increased (P<0.001) in both groups, while the serum level of VIP in the acupuncture group was decreased (P<0.001) compared with those before treatment. The acupuncture group had higher GERD-QOL score and lower SAS score than the medication group (P<0.05), with lower serum VIP level (P<0.05). The total effective rate was 75.8% (25/33) in the acupuncture group, and 76.5% (26/34) in the medication group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). GERDQ score was negatively correlated with GERD-QOL scores (r =-0.762, P<0.01) and positively correlated with HAMD-24 score, SDS score, and SAS score (r =0.709, 0.649, 0.689, P<0.01) before treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the \"heart-stomach connection\" theory, acupuncture could effectively improve clinical symptoms, quality of life, and negative emotions in patients with GERD. Its mechanism may be related to the regulation of gastrointestinal hormone levels, thereby promoting the contraction of the lower esophageal sphincter.
目的：观察基于“心胃相关”理论针刺对胃食管反流病的影响，探讨其可能作用机制。方法：将70例胃食管反流病患者随机分为针刺组（35例，脱落2例）和西药组（35例，脱落1例）。针刺组予针刺治疗，穴取双侧神门、内关、不容、天枢、足三里、公孙及中脘，留针30 min，隔日1次，每周3次；西药组予口服奥美拉唑胶囊，每日1次，每次20 mg。两组均治疗8周。观察两组患者治疗前后胃食管反流病问卷（GERDQ）、胃食管反流病生存质量量表（GERD-QOL）、汉密尔顿抑郁量表（HAMD-24）、Zung抑郁自评量表（SDS）、Zung焦虑自评量表（SAS）评分，检测治疗前后血清胃肠激素[胃泌素（GAS）、胃动素（MTL）、血管活性肠肽（VIP）]含量，并评定两组临床疗效。对治疗前GERDQ评分与GERD-QOL、HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分进行相关性分析。结果：治疗后，两组GERDQ、HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分均较治疗前降低（P<0.001），GERD-QOL评分均较治疗前升高（P<0.001），血清GAS、MTL含量均较治疗前升高（P<0.001），针刺组血清VIP含量较治疗前降低（P<0.001）；针刺组GERD-QOL评分高于西药组（P<0.05），SAS评分低于西药组（P<0.05），血清VIP含量低于西药组（P<0.05）。针刺组总有效率为75.8%（25/33），西药组总有效率为76.5%（26/34），组间比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。治疗前，GERDQ评分与GERD-QOL评分存在负相关关系（r =-0.762，P<0.01），与HAMD-24、SDS、SAS评分存在正相关关系（r =0.709、0.649、0.689，P<0.01）。结论：基于“心胃相关”理论针刺能有效改善胃食管反流病患者的临床症状、生活质量、不良情绪，其机制可能与调节胃肠激素水平，进而促进食管下括约肌收缩有关。.

Accumulating evidence from observational studies have suggested an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, due to that such studies are prone to biases, we imported Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore whether the causal association between two diseases exsit. Hence, we aimed to analysis the potential association with MR. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of GERD were retrieved from the genome-wide association study dataset as the exposure. The SNPs of NAFLD were taken from the FinnGen dataset as the outcome. The relationship was analyzed with the assistance of inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median. We also uitilized the MR-Egger intercept, Cochran\'s Q test, leave-one-out analysis, MR-PRESSO, and Steiger directionality test to evaluate the robustness of the causal association. The meta-analysis were also implemented to give an overall evaluation. Finally, our analysis showed a causal relationship between GERD and NAFLD with aid of MR and meta-analysis (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.40-2.09; P < 0.0001).

Introduction Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a condition characterized by the backflow of gastric contents rising through the esophagus, affecting the aerodigestive tract and leading to throat symptoms such as hoarseness, chronic cough, and throat clearing. LPR is recognized as a separate condition from gastroesophageal reflux disease, despite the fact that they both involve the backflow of the stomach contents as their primary pathology. Our study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of LPR within the population of Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic questionnaire from August to November 2023, involving participants from all five regions of Saudi Arabia. A total of 1140 participants completed the questionnaire, which included the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) to assess the prevalence of LPR. Results LPR was found to be prevalent in 31.2% of the study population, with the most common associated demographics being female gender (p = 0.032) and adults aged 36-45 years (p = 0.006). However, no significant relationship was observed based on region of residence or other demographic factors such as education level or occupation. Conclusion LPR has a high prevalence in the population of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, further research and awareness about this condition are warranted to better understand its impact, improve diagnosis, and develop appropriate management strategies.

BACKGROUND: Night eating syndrome (NES) is a kind of eating disorder. NES association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms among university students is still not fully understood. We aimed to determine the relationship between NES and the presence of GERD symptoms among university students at An-Najah National University in Palestine.
METHODS: This study involved undergraduate students from An-Najah National University. The data were collected through online surveys from November to December 2023. The sampling frame involved voluntary sampling, as the data were collected using a structured questionnaire to collect data on sociodemographic variables, medical history, lifestyle habits, nutritional status, GERD risk, and NES. The GERD questionnaire (GerdQ) was used to assess symptoms, while the Arabic version of the validated Night Eating Questionnaire (NEQ) was used to assess night eating. Physical activity was assessed using the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SF-IPAQ), and adherence to a Mediterranean diet was assessed using the validated Arabic version of the MEDAS. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were also conducted to assess the study hypotheses.
RESULTS: The study involved 554 participants, 59.9% female. A total of 33.4% reported GERD symptoms, with 10.3% having NES. A strong association was observed between GERD and NES and between GERD and physical activity. Night eating syndrome (AOR = 2.84, CI = 1.07-3.19), high physical activity (AOR = 0.473, CI = 1.05-3.19), and non-smoking (AOR = 0.586, CI = 1.27-7.89) were identified as independent predictors of GERD symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that 33.4% of undergraduate students were at risk of GERD, with night eaters having a greater risk. GERD risk was negatively associated with physical activity level and smoking status. No associations were found between GERD risk and weight status, Mediterranean diet adherence, sociodemographic factors, or sleep disturbances.

Objectives To determine the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and associated factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in different regions around the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between 2022 and 2023. The questionnaire was distributed among patients who underwent LSG at different periods, ranging from six months to more than two years. The questionnaire comprised a risk factor assessment and the GERD-Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. Results A total of 387 participants with a mean age of 35.7±10.95 were included. The study included 225 females (58.1%) and 162 males (41.9%). The mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 44.36±8.07 kg/m2, which decreased to 28.78±6.31 kg/m2 postoperatively. Notably, dissatisfaction with general health surged from 17 (24.6%) preoperatively to 165 (42.6%) postoperatively. Despite no significant difference in GERD-HRQL scores in the group who had preoperative symptoms, 282 (72.9%) reported experiencing heartburn, and 289 (74.7%) reported bloating postoperatively. Postoperatively, 203 (52.5%) reported improved quality of life. Moreover, changes in BMI were strongly correlated with heartburn, dysphagia, odynophagia, and bloating. The postoperative prevalence of GERD was 355 (91.7%), with 318 (82.2%) of participants reporting new-onset symptoms. Sex (P=0.013), age (P=0.024), and hypercholesterolemia (P=0.046) were significantly associated with postoperative GERD severity. Conclusions The majority of participants developed GERD symptoms following surgery, with a significant proportion reporting new-onset symptoms. Sex, age, and hypercholesterolemia have emerged as significant factors for postoperative GERD severity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan therapy as compared to conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or no vonoprazan for non-erosive esophagitis.
METHODS: A thorough search was conducted across databases. The primary outcome was to determine the mean variance in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) score after vonoprazan treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised alterations in the scores for epigastric pain and post-prandial distress, the proportion of patients displaying improvement, and the occurrence of adverse events. Pooled mean differences and relative risks were determined utilizing random effects models.
RESULTS: A total of 1,944 articles were screened and nine of them were included. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the GERD score [mean difference: -3.88 (95 % CI: -5.48, -2.28), p < 0.01, i2=95 %]. As compared to PPI or no vonoprazan therapy, vonoprazan treatment led to a significant reduction in the epigastric pain score [mean difference: -3.02 (95 % CI: -5.41, -0.63), p = 0.01, i2=75 %] and post-prandial distress score [mean difference: -2.82 (95 % CI: -3.51, -2.12), p < 0.01, i2=0 %] (all moderate GRADE evidence). Vonoprazan therapy was found to be safe.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with vonoprazan could significantly improve symptoms in patients with non-erosive esophagitis or non-erosive GERD.