Due to the anatomic complexity of the head and neck and variable proximity between laboratory and operating room (OR), effective communication during frozen section analysis (FSA) between surgeons and pathologists is challenging. This proof-of-concept study investigates an augmented reality (AR) protocol that allows pathologists to virtually join the OR from the laboratory. Head and neck cancer specimens were scanned ex vivo using a 3-dimensional scanner and uploaded into an AR platform. Eight head and neck specimens were discussed by surgeons and pathologists in an AR environment. AR-guided intraoperative consultation was used for specimen orientation and discussion of FSA margin sampling sites. One patient had positive initial margins on FSA and was re-resected to negative final margins. AR-guided FSA is possible and allows pathologists to join the operating from any location for intraoperative discussion.

Introduction Uterine masses are commonly submitted for frozen section, to guide the surgeon, regarding the type and extent of the procedure during surgery. Despite the technical difficulties in processing, sectioning, and staining of frozen section samples, it remains a fairly reliable intraoperative tool. Aim This study aims to analyze the diverse spectrum of uterine masses sent for frozen sections for two years. In addition, it aims to analyze the histomorphology of the uterine masses sent for the frozen section and correlate it with that of the routine histopathological findings, thereby justifying the diagnostic value of the frozen section with this study. Furthermore, the study aims to classify the lesions into benign and malignant, quantify their frequency, and list the most common lesions seen in the uterine mass specimens sent for frozen section analysis. Methodology This retrospective descriptive study includes data from January 2021 to December 2022, retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology at Saveetha Medical College. This study includes a total of 76 cases, including all the uterine masses sent for frozen section analysis during the study period. Results Of the total of 76 cases received, 17 (22.4%) were malignant and 59 (77.6%) were benign. Of the malignant cases reported, the most common was endometrial carcinoma, and the least common entities encountered were carcinosarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Of the benign cases, benign endometrial polyp was the most common endometrial lesion and leiomyoma with and without degeneration was the most common myometrial lesion encountered. Of the 50 cases of leiomyoma encountered, 16 had extensive degenerative changes. The most common degeneration seen in the fibroid was hyaline degeneration, and the least common was xanthogranulomatous degeneration. Conclusions The intraoperative frozen section analysis is a very important diagnostic tool, but we need to be aware of its limitations. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity rates were found to be high. Thus, frozen section diagnoses can be very valuable in the clinical management of uterine tumors. Careful gross examination, sampling from representative areas, and good communication between the pathologist and surgeon may help in avoiding its limitations.

OBJECTIVE: Traditional histopathology is a time-intensive and labor-intensive process involving tissue formalin fixation, paraffin embedding, and microtoming into thin sections for H&E staining. Frozen section analysis is a modality used during surgery to quickly evaluate tissue, but it has limitations, such as the size and number of the specimens that can be analyzed as well as difficulties with fatty and bony tissues. Our objective was to investigate the performance of nonlinear microscopy, a fluorescence microscopy technique, for the rapid examination of resected lung tumors.
METHODS: In this proof-of-principle study, nonlinear microscopy imaging of resected lung tissue was performed on a total of 73 tissue specimens collected from 13 patients who underwent lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for pulmonary nodules.
RESULTS: Two pathologists reviewed the digital nonlinear microscopy images in comparison to the corresponding histopathologic H&E slides from a variety of pulmonary pathologies.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that nonlinear microscopy readily replicates traditional H&E staining for both lung tumors and nonneoplastic pulmonary structures. Nonlinear microscopy provides many advantages over frozen section analysis and is an optical imaging platform that has the potential to augment rapid pathologic evaluation of resected tissues in the age of digital pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the indications for fine-needle cytology and the modalities of frozen section pathological analysis in the management of salivary gland cancer.
METHODS: The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group who drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group according to the formal consensus method.
RESULTS: Fine-needle cytology is recommended as part of the diagnostic work-up for a major salivary gland tumor suspicious for malignancy. Fine-needle cytology should be performed after MRI to avoid artifacts. Frozen section analysis is recommended to confirm the malignant nature of the tumor, to adapt the extent of resection and to indicate neck dissection. Whenever possible, the entire tumor and adjacent salivary or periglandular tissue should be sent for frozen section analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Fine-needle cytology and frozen section analysis play an essential role in the management of salivary gland cancers.

UNASSIGNED: The essential goal of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is to downstage the primary tumor making it amenable for breast conservation surgery (BCS). However, since the safety of this surgery is paramount, post-NACT breast conservation rates remain low. As per the recommendation of the 2018 Early Breast Cancer Trialists\' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) overview of long-term post-NACT follow-up, we have devised a protocol for imaging, localization, rad-path analysis, and documentation of radiotherapy techniques to ensure the safety of post-NACT breast conservation.
UNASSIGNED: This is a retrospective cohort of 180 breast cancer patients who received NACT and were operated on by a single surgical oncologist from 2015 to 2020. After selection based on published guidelines, patients were treated with neoadjuvant systemic (chemo or hormone) therapy. In cases where primary tumors responded and reduced to 1-2 cm in size mid-NACT, the residual tumors were localized by clips under ultrasound guidance and calcification was wire localized. All patients were treated using appropriate surgical and oncoplastic techniques where indicated. Negative margins were ensured by intra-operative rad-path analysis. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were given as per protocol.
UNASSIGNED: In 81 cases that required mastectomy at presentation, we were able to achieve a 72.8% post-NACT BCS rate with the help of oncoplasty. Overall, 142 of 180 (80%) patients were treated with breast conserving surgery of which 80% (121 of 142) were oncoplasty. Margins were assessed on intra-operative frozen and re-excised in the same setting. No positive margins were reported in final histopath of 142 breast conservation procedures. Post-operative complication rates after breast conservation in the first year were at 17% (24 of 142 including two major complications). Patient reported outcomes were satisfactory with increased satisfaction for breast conservation compared with immediate breast reconstruction.
UNASSIGNED: Employing oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) techniques following stringent protocols for accurate localization of the residual tumor, intra-operative rad-path analysis, and adjuvant treatments, we show successful breast conservation in 72.8% of our mastectomy-qualified patients after downstaging by NACT. We also report satisfactory outcomes for post-NACT surgery, patient-reported satisfaction, and survival.

The utility of intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) at the surgical margins (SMs) in patients with upper urinary tract cancer has not been established. We herein assessed the clinical significance of routine FSA of ureteral SMs during nephroureterectomy (NU) or segmental ureterectomy (SU).
A retrospective review of our Surgical Pathology database identified consecutive patients undergoing NU (n=246) or SU (n=42) for urothelial carcinoma from 2004 to 2018. FSA (n=54) was correlated with the diagnosis of frozen section controls, the status of final SMs, and the prognosis of patients.
During NU, FSA was performed in 19 (7.7%) patients and was significantly more often requested in cases with ureteral tumor (13.1%) than in those with renal pelvis/calyx tumor (3.5%). Final SMs at the distal ureter/bladder cuff were positive only in non-FSA cases in the entire NU cohort (8.4%; P=0.375) or those with tumor at the lower ureter (57.6%; P=0.046), but not in any of FSA patients (0%). During SU, FSA was performed in 35 (83.3%) cases, including 19 at either proximal or distal SM and 16 at both SMs (SU-FSA2). Final positive SMs were significantly more often detected in non-FSA patients (42.9%) than in all FSA (8.6%; P=0.048) or SU-FSA2 (0%; P=0.020) patients. Overall, FSAs were reported as positive or high-grade carcinoma (n=7), atypical or dysplasia (n=13), and negative (n=34), and all these diagnoses were confirmed accurate on the frozen section controls, except one with a revision from atypical to carcinoma in situ. Meanwhile, 16 (80.0%) of 20 cases with initial positive/atypical FSA achieved negative conversion by excision of additional tissue. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that SU-FSA did not significantly reduce the risk of tumor recurrence in the bladder, disease progression, or cancer-specific mortality. Nonetheless, NU-FSA was strongly associated with reduced progression-free (P=0.023) and cancer-specific (P=0.007) survival rates, compared with non-FSA, which may imply a selection bias (e.g., FSA for clinically more aggressive tumors).
Performing FSA during NU for lower ureteral tumor, as well as during SU, significantly reduced the risk of positive SMs. However, routine FSA for upper urinary tract cancer failed to considerably improve long-term oncologic outcome.

Inadequate resection margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma surgery necessitate adjuvant therapies such as re-resection and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and imply increasing morbidity and worse prognosis. On the other hand, taking larger margins by extending the resection also leads to avoidable increased morbidity. Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCCs) are often difficult to access; resections are limited by anatomy and functionality and thus carry an increased risk for close or positive margins. Therefore, there is a need to improve intraoperative assessment of resection margins. Several intraoperative techniques are available, but these often lead to prolonged operative time and are only suitable for a subgroup of patients. In recent years, new diagnostic tools have been the subject of investigation. This study reviews the available literature on intraoperative techniques to improve resection margins for OPSCCs. A literature search was performed in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane. Narrow band imaging (NBI), high-resolution microendoscopic imaging, confocal laser endomicroscopy, frozen section analysis (FSA), ultrasound (US), computed tomography scan (CT), (auto) fluorescence imaging (FI), and augmented reality (AR) have all been used for OPSCC. NBI, FSA, and US are most commonly used and increase the rate of negative margins. Other techniques will become available in the future, of which fluorescence imaging has high potential for use with OPSCC.

BACKGROUND: Numerous challenges exist in determining surgical margin status. Communication between surgeons and pathologists is crucial for specimen orientation and accurate margin assessment.
METHODS: A prospective study to determine feasibility of incorporating three-dimensional (3D) scanning into surgical pathology workflow was performed. A structured-light 3D scanner captured the photorealistic surface topography of fresh surgical specimens. Computer-aided design (CAD) software was used to document sites of margin sampling and sectioning. Surveys were distributed among faculty and staff stakeholders to assess feasibility.
RESULTS: A series of 40 cases were 3D-scanned. Median image acquisition time was 8 min. The majority of respondents agreed that the experimental 3D system helped achieve clearer communication. 3D specimen maps assisted in the communication of a focally positive or close margin in 4 of 17 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine 3D scanning and specimen mapping is feasible and represents an innovative approach to intraoperative and final pathology documentation, margin analysis, and surgeon-pathologist communication.

OBJECTIVE: An accurate evaluation of resection margin (RM) is critical in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as negative RM status is critical for successful local control. We compared gross and microscopic methods for RM evaluation and analyzed their concordances.
METHODS: Gross evaluation (GE), frozen section analysis (FSA), and permanent section diagnosis (PSD) were compared for specimens from 725 breast cancer patients.
RESULTS: The RM was grossly involved in 74 cases (10.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of GE were 22.9% and 96.1%, respectively. FSA revealed positive RM in 290 cases (40.0%), with high sensitivity (86.7%) and specificity (83.1%). With PSD, 240 cases (33.1%) showed RM involvement. Discordant results between gross and microscopic methods were observed in 104 cases (14.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations of the low sensitivity of GE, high discordance rate between gross and microscopic methods, and high sensitivity and specificity of FSA support the necessity of intraoperative FSA for assessing RM status during BCS.

Background Intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) declined in the post American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 (ACOSOG Z0011) trial era. However, for those patients who do not meet the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria, FSA continues to be a valuable tool in intraoperative decision-making for axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The aim of this study was therefore to retrospectively evaluate the benefit and accuracy of FSA of Z0011 criteria eligible versus ineligible patients and identify possible predictive factors for false negative results. Methods Intraoperative FSA was performed on SLNs of 522 cT1-T3 breast cancer patients between 2008 and 2013. Clinicopathologic characteristics were retrospectively assessed by chart review. Results Overall FSA sensitivity and specificity was 67.8% and 100%. Sensitivity was generally higher for macrometastasis than for micrometastasis. The Z0011 eligible group showed a sensitivity and specificity of 72.7% and 100% versus 62.1% and 100% in the Z0011 ineligible group. Importantly, subgroup analysis of ≤ 2 versus > 2 positive SLNs of the Z0011 eligible group demonstrated both a 100% specificity and sensitivity. Several clinicopathologic factors were associated with a higher rate of false negative results in the Z0011 ineligible patient group. FSA was beneficial for 22.2% of Z0011 ineligible patients and for only 0.6% of Z0011 eligible patients regarding intraoperative decision-making for ALND. Conclusions FSA continues to be especially beneficial in the intraoperative assessment of SLNs in the Z0011 ineligible group to prevent second stage ALND. Despite an overall lower FSA sensitivity in the Z0011 eligible patient group, FSA offers in both groups a comparable high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy for macrometastasis.
Hintergrund Nach der Veröffentlichung der American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011-Studie (ACOSOG Z0011) ist die Analyse der intraoperativen Gefrierschnitte von Wächterlymphknoten zurückgegangen. Aber für Patientinnen, welche die ACOSOG Z0011-Kriterien nicht erfüllen, bleibt die Gefrierschnittanalyse ein wichtiges Instrument für die intraoperative Entscheidungsfindung im Hinblick auf eine Axilladissektion. Ziel dieser Studie war es, eine retrospektive Evaluierung der Vorteile und der diagnostischen Genauigkeit von Gefrierschnittanalysen bei Brustkrebspatientinnen durchzuführen, welche die Kriterien der Z0011-Studie erfüllten oder nicht erfüllten, und dabei mögliche prädiktive Faktoren für falsch negative Ergebnisse festzustellen. Methoden Zwischen 2008 und 2013 wurde eine intraoperative Gefrierschnittanalyse der Wächterlymphknoten bei 522 cT1–T3-Brustkrebspatientinnen durchgeführt. Die klinisch-pathologischen Merkmale wurden retrospektiv mithilfe der Krankenakten evaluiert. Ergebnisse Insgesamt betrug die Sensitivität und Spezifität für alle Gefrierschnittanalysen 67,8% bzw. 100%. Generell war die Sensitivität für Makrometastasen höher als für Mikrometastasen. Bei der Gruppe, welche die Kriterien der Z0011-Studie erfüllte, betrugen die Sensitivität und Spezifität 72,7% bzw. 100%, verglichen mit 62,1% bzw. 100% für die Gruppe, welche die Z0011-Kriterien nicht erfüllte. In der Gruppe, welche die Z0011-Kriterien erfüllte, wurde eine Untergruppenanalyse durchgeführt, und die Ergebnisse für ≤ 2 positiven Wächterlymphknoten wurden mit den Ergebnissen für > 2 verglichen. Bei beiden Untergruppen betrugen Spezifität und Sensitivität jeweils 100%. In der Patientinnengruppe, welche die Z0011-Kriterien nicht erfüllte, waren mehrere klinisch-pathologische Faktoren mit einer höheren Rate an falsch positiven Ergebnissen assoziiert. Im Hinblick auf die intraoperative Entscheidungsfindung für eine Axilladissektion brachte die Durchführung einer intraoperativen Gefrierschnittanalyse Vorteile für 22,2% der Patientinnen, welche die Z0011-Kriterien nicht erfüllten, aber nur für 0,6% der Patientinnen, welche die Z0011-Kriterien erfüllten. Schlussfolgerungen Die Gefrierschnittanalyse ist besonders für die intraoperative Evaluierung von Wächterlymphknoten bei Patientinnen, welche die Z0011-Kriterien nicht erfüllen, vorteilhaft, da dadurch eine Zweitoperation zur Axilladissektion vermieden werden kann. Obwohl die Sensitivität der Gefrierschnittanalyse in der Gruppe, welche die Z0011-Kriterien erfüllte, insgesamt niedriger war, hat die Gefrierschnittanalyse in beiden Gruppen eine vergleichbar hohe Sensitivität und diagnostische Genauigkeit für Makrometastasen.