OBJECTIVE: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors offer the ability to expand the lung donor pool and ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) further contributes to this ability by allowing for additional evaluation and resuscitation of these extended criteria donors. We sought to determine the outcomes of recipients receiving organs from DCD EVLP donors in a multicenter setting.
METHODS: This was an unplanned post hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized trial that took place during 2011 to 2017 with 3 years of follow-up. Patients were placed into 3 groups based off procurement strategy: brain-dead donor (control), brain-dead donor evaluated by EVLP, and DCD donors evaluated by EVLP. The primary outcomes were severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours and survival. Secondary outcomes included select perioperative outcomes, and 1-year and 3-years allograft function and quality of life measures.
RESULTS: The DCD EVLP group had significantly higher incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (P = .03), longer days on mechanical ventilation (P < .001) and in-hospital length of stay (P = .045). Survival at 3 years was 76.5% (95% CI, 69.2%-84.7%) for the control group, 68.3% (95% CI, 58.9%-79.1%) for the brain-dead donor group, and 60.7% (95% CI, 45.1%-81.8%) for the DCD group (P = .36). At 3-year follow-up, presence observed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome or quality of life metrics did not differ among the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Although DCD EVLP allografts might not be appropriate to transplant in every candidate recipient, the expansion of their use might afford recipients stagnant on the waitlist a viable therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Lung transplantation remains limited by the shortage of healthy organs. Cross-circulation with a healthy swine recipient provides a durable physiologic environment to recover injured donor lungs. In a clinical application, a recipient awaiting lung transplantation could be placed on cross-circulation to recover damaged donor lungs, enabling eventual transplantation. Our objective was to assess the ability of recipient swine with respiratory compromise to tolerate cross-circulation and support recovery of donor lungs subjected to extended cold ischemia.
METHODS: Swine donor lungs (n = 6) were stored at 4 °C for 24 hours while recipient swine (n = 6) underwent gastric aspiration injury before cross-circulation. Longitudinal multiscale analyses (blood gas, bronchoscopy, radiography, histopathology, cytokine quantification) were performed to evaluate recipient swine and extracorporeal lungs on cross-circulation.
RESULTS: Recipient swine lung injury resulted in sustained, impaired oxygenation (arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction ratio 205 ± 39 mm Hg vs 454 ± 111 mm Hg at baseline). Radiographic, bronchoscopic, and histologic assessments demonstrated bilateral infiltrates, airway cytokine elevation, and significantly worsened lung injury scores. Recipient swine provided sufficient metabolic support for extracorporeal lungs to demonstrate robust functional improvement (0 hours, arterial oxygen tension/inspired oxygen fraction ratio 138 ± 28.2 mm Hg; 24 hours, 539 ± 156 mm Hg). Multiscale analyses demonstrated improved gross appearance, aeration, and cellular regeneration in extracorporeal lungs by 24 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that acutely injured recipient swine tolerate cross-circulation and enable recovery of donor lungs subjected to extended cold storage. This proof-of-concept study supports feasibility of cross-circulation for recipients with isolated lung disease who are candidates for this clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: Ex vivo lung perfusion has emerged as a platform for organ preservation, evaluation, and restoration. Gene delivery using a clinically relevant adeno-associated vector during ex vivo lung perfusion may be useful in optimizing donor allografts while the graft is maintained physiologically active. We evaluated the feasibility of adeno-associated vector-mediated gene delivery during ex vivo lung perfusion in a rat transplant model. Additionally, we assessed off-target effects and explored different routes of delivery.
METHODS: Rat heart-lung blocks were procured and underwent 1-hour ex vivo lung perfusion. Before ex vivo lung perfusion, 4e11 viral genome luciferase encoding adeno-associated vector 9 was administered via the left bronchus (Br group, n = 4), via the left pulmonary artery (PA group, n = 3), or directly into the circuit (Circuit group, n = 3). Donor lungs in the Control group (n = 3) underwent ex vivo lung perfusion without adeno-associated vector 9. Only the left lung was transplanted. Animals underwent bioluminescence imaging weekly before being killed at 2 weeks. Tissues were collected for luciferase activity measurement.
RESULTS: All recipients tolerated the transplant well. At 2 weeks post-transplant, luciferase activity in the transplanted lung was significantly higher among animals in the Br group compared with the other 3 groups (Br: 1.1 × 106 RLU/g, PA: 8.3 × 104 RLU/g, Circuit: 3.8 × 103 RLU/g, Control: 2.5 × 103 RLU/g, P = .0003). No off-target transgene expression was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: In this work, we demonstrate that a clinically relevant adeno-associated vector 9 vector mediates gene transduction during ex vivo lung perfusion in rat lung grafts when administered via the airway and potentially the pulmonary artery. Our preliminary results suggest a higher transduction efficiency when adeno-associated vector 9 was delivered via the airway, and delivery during ex vivo lung perfusion reduces off-target effects after graft implant.

Diagnosing lung injury is a challenge in lung transplantation. It has been unclear if a single biopsy specimen is truly representative of the entire organ. Our objective was to investigate lung inflammatory biomarkers using human lung tissue biopsies and ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate.
Eight human donor lungs declined for transplantation were air inflated, flash frozen, and partitioned from apex to base. Biopsies were then sampled throughout the lung. Perfusate was sampled from 4 lung lobes in 8 additional donor lungs subjected to ex vivo lung perfusion. The levels of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, and interleukin-1β were measured using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction from lung biopsies and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay from ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate.
The median intra-biopsy equal-variance P value was .50 for messenger RNA biomarkers in tissue biopsies. The median intra-biopsy coefficient of variance was 18%. In donors with no apparent focal injuries, the biopsies in each donor showed no difference in various lung slices, with a coefficient of variance of 20%. The exception was biopsies from the lingula and injured focal areas that demonstrated larger differences. Cytokines in ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate showed minimal variation among different lobes (coefficient of variance = 4.9%).
Cytokine gene expression in lung biopsies was consistent, and the biopsy analysis reflects the whole lung, except when specimens were collected from the lingula or an area of focal injury. Ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate also provides a representative measurement of lung inflammation from the draining lobe. These results will reassure clinicians that a lung biopsy or an ex vivo lung perfusion perfusate sample can be used to inform donor lung selection.

UNASSIGNED: Cytomegalovirus infection after lung transplant is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Inflammation, infection, and longer ischemic times are important risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection. Ex vivo lung perfusion has helped to successfully increase the use of high-risk donors over the last decade. However, the impact of ex vivo lung perfusion on post-transplant cytomegalovirus infection is unknown.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective analysis of all adult lung transplant recipients from 2010 to 2020. The primary end point was comparison of cytomegalovirus viremia between patients who received ex vivo lung perfusion donor lungs and patients who received non-ex vivo lung perfusion donor lungs. Cytomegalovirus viremia was defined as cytomegalovirus viral load greater than 1000 IU/mL within 2 years post-transplant. Secondary end points were the time from lung transplant to cytomegalovirus viremia, peak cytomegalovirus viral load, and survival. Outcomes were also compared between the different donor recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus matching groups.
UNASSIGNED: Included were 902 recipients of non-ex vivo lung perfusion lungs and 403 recipients of ex vivo lung perfusion lungs. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the cytomegalovirus serostatus matching groups. A total of 34.6% of patients in the non-ex vivo lung perfusion group developed cytomegalovirus viremia, as did 30.8% in the ex vivo lung perfusion group (P = .17). There was no difference in time to viremia, peak viral loads, or survival when comparing both groups. Likewise, all outcomes were comparable in the non-ex vivo lung perfusion and ex vivo lung perfusion groups within each serostatus matching group.
UNASSIGNED: The practice of using more injured donor organs via ex vivo lung perfusion has not affected cytomegalovirus viremia rates and severity in lung transplant recipients in our center.

Xenotransplantation promises to alleviate the issue of donor organ shortages and to decrease waiting times for transplantation. Recent advances in genetic engineering have allowed for the creation of pigs with up to 16 genetic modifications. Several combinations of genetic modifications have been associated with extended graft survival and life-supporting function in experimental heart and kidney xenotransplants. Lung xenotransplantation carries specific challenges related to the large surface area of the lung vascular bed, its innate immune system\'s intrinsic hyperreactivity to perceived \'danger\', and its anatomic vulnerability to airway flooding after even localized loss of alveolocapillary barrier function. This article discusses the current status of lung xenotransplantation, and challenges related to immunology, physiology, anatomy, and infection. Tissue engineering as a feasible alternative to develop a viable lung replacement solution is discussed.

Clodronate-liposome is used for depleting mononuclear phagocytes associated with ischemia-reperfusion injury. We hypothesized that administration of clodronate-liposome into the perfusate during ex vivo lung perfusion could reduce mononuclear phagocytes and attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury.
First, the number of mononuclear phagocytes in flushed grafts (minimum cold ischemic time, 6-hour cold ischemic time, 15-hour cold ischemic time, and 18-hour cold ischemic time; n = 6 each) was determined using flow cytometry. Second, grafts (15-hour cold ischemic time) were allocated to control or clodronate (n = 5 each). In the clodronate group, clodronate-liposome is administered into the perfusate. After 4 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion, the number of mononuclear phagocytes in the perfusate and lung tissues was measured. Third, grafts (15-hour cold ischemic time) were allocated to control or clodronate (n = 6 each). After 4 hours of ex vivo lung perfusion, the left lungs were transplanted and reperfused for 2 hours. Lung function was evaluated, and samples were analyzed.
First, mononuclear phagocytes remain in flushed grafts after prolonged cold ischemia. Second, the number of mononuclear phagocytes in lung tissues after ex vivo lung perfusion was significantly reduced in the clodronate group (P = .008). Third, lung compliance and vascular resistance during ex vivo lung perfusion were significantly improved in the clodronate group (P < .001 for both). Blood oxygenation and pulmonary edema were significantly improved in the clodronate group after 2 hours of reperfusion (P = .015 and P = .026, respectively). Histological findings showed reduced lung injury in the clodronate group (P = .013).
Administration of clodronate-liposome into the perfusate during ex vivo lung perfusion resulted in a significant reduction of mononuclear phagocytes in donor lungs, leading to attenuation of ischemia-reperfusion injury.

暂无摘要。

An increased focus on improving efficiency and decreasing costs has resulted in alternative models of donor management and organ recovery. The specialized donor care facility model provides highly efficient and cost-effective donor care at a free-standing facility, resulting in improved organ yield, shorter ischemic times, decreased travel, and fewer nighttime operations. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) improves utilization of extended criteria donor lungs, and centralized EVLP facilities have the potential to increase transplant volumes for smaller transplant programs in specified geographic regions. These alternative models are increasingly being used in the United States to improve waitlist mortality and combat the ongoing donor organ shortage.

The decision to perform a single-lung transplant (SLT) when the contralateral donor lung is rejected is a challenging scenario. The introduction of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has improved donor lung assessment, and we hypothesize that it has improved SLT outcomes in this setting.
A retrospective single-center review of all SLTs performed between 2000 and 2017 was performed in which the years 2000 to 2008 were considered the \"pre-EVLP era\" and 2009 to 2017 the \"EVLP era.\" Recipients of SLT lungs when the contralateral lung was declined were classified into 3 groups: (1) Pre-EVLP era, (2a) EVLP era but EVLP not used, and (2b) EVLP era and EVLP used. The outcomes of interest were survival, time-to-extubation, and intensive care unit and hospital stay.
Among 1692 transplants between 2000 and 2017, 244 (14%) were SLT. SLT rate was similar between eras (pre-EVLP 16% vs EVLP 15%), but more SLTs were performed where the contralateral lung was declined in the EVLP era (pre-EVLP 32% vs EVLP 45%, P = .04). Lungs evaluated on EVLP had lower procurement partial pressure of oxygen and were more often from donation after cardiac death donors. Recipients were generally also sicker, with a greater proportion of rapidly deteriorating recipients. Despite this, outcomes were similar between eras with a trend towards lower 30-day mortality in the EVLP era.
The availability of EVLP allowed for better evaluation of marginal single lungs when the contralateral was declined. This has led to increased use rates with preserved outcomes despite use of more extended criteria organs.