dysgraphia

书写困难症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:书写困难,公认的PD运动症状,缺乏有效的临床评估。当前的评估依赖于运动评估量表。过去十年引入的计算方法提供了客观的书写困难评估,考虑到尺寸,持续时间,速度,和笔迹流畅。客观评价书写障碍可能有助于PD的早期诊断。
    目的:新发PD患者书写障碍的计算机评估及其与临床量表的相关性。
    方法:我们评估了最近诊断的38例,术前用药PD患者和年龄匹配的对照组无神经系统疾病。参与者在纸上写了三遍“LacasadePamplonaesbonita”,一次在纸下的Wacom平板电脑上,总共四个短语。分析了5-10s的写作片段。Wacom平板电脑捕获了运动学数据,包括平均速度,平均加速度,笔的压力。数据已保存在中。svc格式,并使用TecnocadusMataró开发的专业软件进行分析。标准临床实践数据,Hoehn&Yahr分期,和UPDRS量表用于评估。
    结果:存在明显的运动学差异;患者的平均速度较低(27±12vs.48±18,p<0.0001)和平均加速度(7.2±3.9与比对照组15.01±7,p<0.0001)。平均速度和平均加速度与UPDRSIII评分显着相关(速度:r=-0.52,p<0.0007;加速度:r=0.60,p<0.0001),在PD评估中指示运动学参数的潜力。
    结论:在PD患者中可以识别出书写障碍,即使是从头,表明早期症状并与临床量表相关,为客观的PD患者评估提供了潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Dysgraphia, a recognized PD motor symptom, lacks effective clinical assessment. Current evaluation relies on motor assessment scales. Computational methods introduced over the past decade offer an objective dysgraphia assessment, considering size, duration, speed, and handwriting fluency. Objective evaluation of dysgraphia may be of help for early diagnosis of PD.
    OBJECTIVE: Computerized assessment of dysgraphia in de novo PD patients and its correlation with clinical scales.
    METHODS: We evaluated 38 recently diagnosed, premedication PD patients and age-matched controls without neurological disorders. Participants wrote \"La casa de Pamplona es bonita\" three times on paper and once on a Wacom tablet under the paper, totaling four phrases. Writing segments of 5-10 s were analyzed. The Wacom tablet captured kinematic data, including mean velocity, mean acceleration, and pen pressure. Data were saved in.svc format and analyzed using specialized software developed by Tecnocampus Mataró. Standard clinical practice data, Hoehn & Yahr staging, and UPDRS scales were used for evaluation.
    RESULTS: Significant kinematic differences existed; patients had lower mean speed (27 ± 12 vs. 48 ± 18, p < 0.0001) and mean acceleration (7.2 ± 3.9 vs. 15.01 ± 7, p < 0.0001) than controls. Mean speed and mean acceleration correlated significantly with UPDRS III scores (speed: r = -0.52, p < 0.0007; acceleration: r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), indicating kinematic parameters\' potential in PD evaluation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dysgraphia is identifiable in PD patients, even de novo, indicating an early symptom and correlates with clinical scales, offering potential for objective PD patient evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特殊教育技术的发展使新的互动形式成为可能,现在可以帮助学生患有计算障碍。近几十年来,人工智能(AI)已经成为一种有前途的工具,特别是在2001年至2010年期间,为患有计算障碍的个人提供了提高教育质量的途径。因此,人工智能的实施对于满足患有计算障碍的学生的需求至关重要。内容分析技术用于检查涵盖AI对计算障碍的影响及其在帮助教师促进对计算障碍个体的教育方面的潜力的文献。该研究旨在通过深入研究为未来更具包容性的计算障碍教育奠定基础。人工智能集成对教育机构以及与计算障碍斗争的人们产生了巨大的影响。本文强调了AI在改善受计算障碍影响的学生的教育成果方面的重要性。
    New forms of interaction made possible by developments in special educational technologies can now help students with dyscalculia. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising tool in recent decades, particularly between 2001 and 2010, offering avenues to enhance the quality of education for individuals with dyscalculia. Therefore, the implementation of AI becomes crucial in addressing the needs of students with dyscalculia. Content analysis techniques were used to examine the literature covering the influence of AI on dyscalculia and its potential to assist instructors in promoting education for individuals with dyscalculia. The study sought to create a foundation for a more inclusive dyscalculia education in the future through in-depth studies. AI integration has had a big impact on educational institutions as well as people who struggle with dyscalculia. This paper highlights the importance of AI in improving the educational outcomes of students affected by dyscalculia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手写缺陷,或者书写困难,存在于几种神经发育障碍中。为了调查书写困难是否根据相关疾病而有所不同,我们对发育协调障碍(DCD)儿童的笔迹进行了详细分析,阅读障碍(RD),或合并症RD和DCD。在产品(痕迹的质量)和过程(产生痕迹的运动)水平上研究了手写缺陷。19名患有奇异RD的儿童(其中8名患有视力障碍),13名患有奇异DCD的儿童(其中7名患有书写困难),16名患有RD+DCD合并症的儿童(其中11名患有语言障碍),和20个典型的发育中的儿童,7至12岁,进行了BHK(勇敢手写Kinder)测试,笔迹的标准化评估,在图形平板电脑上。发育协调障碍主要影响笔迹质量,而RD影响缓慢,在较小程度上,质量。有RD的孩子,单独或与DCD共病,写字时抬起和停止笔而浪费了时间。合并症增加但没有恶化,手写困难。这些结果反映了DCD或RD儿童的不同运动障碍和/或策略。我们确定了书写困难的亚型,并主张在研究书写困难时对写作过程进行细粒度分析以及对运动和阅读技能的评估。
    Handwriting deficits, or dysgraphia, are present in several neurodevelopmental disorders. To investigate whether dysgraphia differs according to the associated disorder, we performed a detailed analysis of handwriting in children with developmental coordination disorders (DCD), reading disorder (RD), or comorbid RD and DCD. Handwriting deficits were investigated at the product (quality of the trace) and the process (movement that generates the trace) levels. Nineteen children with singular RD (among which eight with dysgraphia), 13 children with singular DCD (among which seven with dysgraphia), 16 children with comorbid RD+DCD (among which 11 with dysgraphia), and 20 typically developing children, age 7 to 12, performed the BHK (Brave Handwriting Kinder) test, a standardized assessment of handwriting, on a graphic tablet. Developmental coordination disorders primarily affected handwriting quality, while RD affected slowness and, to a lesser extent, quality. Children with RD, solely or comorbid with DCD, wasted time by lifting and stopping the pen when writing. The comorbidity added to but did not worsen, handwriting difficulties. These results reflect distinct motor impairments and/or strategies in children with DCD or RD. We identified subtypes of dysgraphia and advocated for a fine-grained analysis of the writing process and the assessment of motor and reading skills when studying dysgraphia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的笔迹异常有时在产品层面(即,书写轨迹的质量/可读性和书写速度)和(ii)在过程级别(即,动态和运动学特征,如纸上和空中持续时间,笔压力和速度峰值,等。).相反,其他作品未能揭示ADHD和通常发育中的儿童之间的任何差异。多动症中笔迹缺陷的存在和性质的问题仍然悬而未决,值得深入研究。这次系统审查的目的是,因此,以确定调查ADHD儿童笔迹的产品和/或过程的研究。这项审查是根据PRISMA声明进行和报告的。使用三个电子数据库进行文献检索。使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)标准系统地评估了研究的方法学质量。确定了21篇文章。其中,17描述的手写质量/易读性,12专注于速度,14分析了手写过程。所有的研究(100%)与满意的方法学程序报告的产品和过程受损的儿童多动症,而25%的人证明了生产速度的差异。最重要的是,这些研究在方法论上有很大的不同。仍然存在巨大的差距,特别是在确定合并症方面,ADHD亚型和纳入儿童的医疗状况。样本缺乏整体同质性,需要更高质量的研究。最后,我们提出了进一步研究的建议。
    Handwriting abnormalities in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have sometimes been reported both (i) at the product level (i.e., quality/legibility of the written trace and speed of writing) and (ii) at the process level (i.e., dynamic and kinematic features, such as on-paper and in-air durations, pen pressure and velocity peaks, etc.). Conversely, other works have failed to reveal any differences between ADHD and typically developing children. The question of the presence and nature of handwriting deficits in ADHD remains open and merits an in-depth examination. The aim of this systematic review was, therefore, to identify studies that have investigated the product and/or process of handwriting in children with ADHD compared to typically developing individuals. This review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA statement. A literature search was carried out using three electronic databases. The methodological quality of the studies was systematically assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) criteria. Twenty-one articles were identified. Of these, 17 described handwriting quality/legibility, 12 focused on speed and 14 analyzed the handwriting process. All the studies (100%) with satisfactory methodology procedures reported an impaired product and process in children with ADHD, while 25% evidenced a difference in the speed of production. Most importantly, the studies differed widely in their methodological approaches. Substantial gaps remain, particularly with regard to ascertaining comorbidities, ADHD subtypes and the medical status of the included children. The lack of overall homogeneity in the samples calls for higher quality studies. We conclude with recommendations for further studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于语言的学习障碍(LBLD)是指一系列与神经发育相关的障碍,其特征是在理解方面的认知和行为差异,处理和利用口头和/或书面语言。这项工作的重点是确定包括阅读障碍在内的三种主要特定LBLD的早期预测因子,计算障碍,和书写困难。
    在WebofScience(WoS)中搜索了与(神经认知,神经生理学,和神经影像学)的测量用于识别1991年至2021年10月25日的LBLD的早期预测因子。进行了回顾性文献计量分析,以分析各国之间的合作,机构,作者,出版期刊,参考共同引用模式,关键字共现,关键字聚类,并使用Biblioanalystic软件突发关键字。
    总共,921种与使用LBLD的识别相关的出版物(神经认知,神经生理学,和神经影像学)模式被包括在内。数据分析显示,90年代和2000年初对该主题的研究增长缓慢,近年来呈增长趋势。最多产和被引用的杂志是神经影像,其次是神经心理学。美国和芬兰的Jyvaskyla大学和赫尔辛基大学是这一领域的领先国家和机构,分别。“神经成像,\"\"大脑,功能磁共振成像,“\”认知预测因子,“共病”,“皮质厚度”被确定为(神经认知,神经生理学,和神经影像学)识别LBLD的方式。
    LBLD的早期预测因子将作为在非常年轻的年龄实施的具体预防和干预计划的目标,这可能会产生重大的临床影响。神经影像学预测因子与神经认知和神经心理学电池相结合的新发现可能对未来的研究产生影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Language-based learning disabilities (LBLD) refers to a spectrum of neurodevelopmental-associated disorders that are characterized by cognitive and behavioral differences in comprehending, processing and utilizing spoken and/or written language. The focus of this work was on identifying early predictors of three main specific LBLD including dyslexia, dyscalculia, and dysgraphia.
    UNASSIGNED: The Web of Science (WoS) was searched for literature related to (neurocognitive, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging) measurements used to identify early predictors of LBLD from 1991 to 25 October 2021. A retrospective bibliometric analysis was performed to analyze collaboration among countries, institutions, authors, publishing journals, reference co-citation patterns, keyword co-occurrence, keyword clustering, and burst keywords using Biblioanalytics software.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 921 publications related to the identification of LBLD using (neurocognitive, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging) modalities were included. The data analysis shows a slow growth in research on the topic in the 90s and early 2000 and growing trend in recent years. The most prolific and cited journal is Neuroimage, followed by Neuropsychologia. The United States and Finland\'s Universities Jyvaskyla and Helsinki are the leading country and institution in this field, respectively. \"Neuroimaging,\" \"brain,\" \"fMRI,\" \"cognitive predictor,\" \"comorbidity,\" \"cortical thickness\" were identified as hotspots and trends of (neurocognitive, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging) modalities in the identification of LBLD.
    UNASSIGNED: Early predictors of LBLDs would be useful as targets for specific prevention and intervention programs to be implemented at very young ages, which could have a significant clinical impact. A novel finding of neuroimaging predictors combined with neurocognitive and neuropsychological batteries may have implications for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项临床审查旨在帮助儿科医生,家庭医生或内科医生照顾孩子,青春期,已通过染色体分析确认诊断为16p11.2缺失综合征的成人和家庭。虽然儿科医生与孩子的初次接触通常是在生命的最初5年内,偶尔,青少年或成年人会在他们的兄弟姐妹或孩子被诊断出患有相同的疾病后进行测试和诊断。补充图1中提供了临床医生的年龄特定指导。16p11.2缺失是神经发育障碍(1)和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的最常见遗传原因,其特征是运动言语障碍,语言障碍,电机协调困难,某种程度的发育迟缓,低于平均水平的认知,语言和非语言领域的学习障碍和精神疾病。(表1)(2)。而那些16p11.2缺失的人有一定程度的开发延迟,严重程度可能有很大差异。意识和对问题的迅速关注对于优化终身成果很重要。没有可以促进快速临床诊断的病理表型特征,然而,椎体异常(通常导致脊柱侧凸)(3),听力障碍,心脏畸形(3),先天性肾脏和泌尿道异常(4),略低于平均身高(3),大头畸形(3),和颅骨融合(3)在一些个体中被发现缺失。没有病人会拥有所有这些特征。
    Rare genetic conditions are challenging for the primary care provider to manage without proper guidelines. This clinical review is designed to assist the pediatrician, family physician, or internist in the primary care setting to manage the complexities of 16p11.2 deletion syndrome. A multidisciplinary medical home with the primary care provider leading the care and armed with up-to-date guidelines will prove most helpful to the rare genetic patient population. A special focus on technology to fill gaps in deficits, review of case studies on novel medical treatments, and involvement with the educational system for advocacy with an emphasis on celebrating diversity will serve the rare genetic syndrome population well.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于书写困难的研究,书面形式的损害,最近获得了更多的关注。现有的关于书写困难的研究从认知、行为,神经学,和遗传知识领域。然而,这些关于书写困难的多项研究未能说明这些认知,行为,神经学,和遗传系统相互作用并相交在书写困难中。因此,这些研究无法提供对书写困难症的全面了解。为了填补这个空白,这篇综述试图通过容纳认知的见解,使用模块化的概念来研究书写困难,行为,神经学,和书写困难的遗传方面。如此深刻的理解可以促进对书写困难症的早期诊断和整体干预。
    Research regarding dysgraphia, an impairment in writing, is attaining more attention in recent times. The existing studies on dysgraphia draw insights from cognitive, behavioural, neurological, and genetic fields of knowledge. However, these multiple studies on dysgraphia fail to illustrate how these cognitive, behavioural, neurological, and genetic systems interact and intersect in dysgraphia. Therefore, the studies could not offer a comprehensive understanding of dysgraphia. In order to fill this gap, the review attempts to study dysgraphia using the notion of modularity by accommodating insights from cognitive, behavioural, neurological, and genetic aspects of dysgraphia. Such a profound understanding could facilitate an early diagnosis and holistic intervention towards dysgraphia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特定学习障碍(SLD)是一种由非典型大脑功能引起的认知神经生物学障碍。当个人在学校的成绩低于预期年龄时,SLD被认可,学校教育,和智力水平。由卫生人员筛查数百万患有SLD的学生是不可能的。学校教师对学习障碍的认识和知识可能在早期识别和管理患有这些障碍的儿童中起着重要作用。因此,对教师关于学习障碍(LD)的知识和看法的评估是相关的。
    在Vellore的政府/政府资助和私立学校的教师中进行了一项基于学校的横断面研究,印度。通过简单随机抽样方法选择参与者。共有80名教师参与了这项研究。使用问卷进行数据捕获。进行卡方检验以测试关联,比值比检验有助于确定关联的强度。P值<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的。
    大多数教师(70%)对LD有足够的常识。当单独分析时,82.5%的政府/援助教师和只有57.5%的教师对LD有足够的常识。学校类型与有关LD的一般知识之间存在显着关联。与私人教师相比,政府/受助教师对LD和阅读障碍的一般知识更好。
    在80名教师中,70%(56)的人对LD有足够的常识。当单独分析时,82.5%(33)的政府/援助教师和只有57.5%(23)的教师对LD有足够的常识。与私立学校教师相比,政府/资助学校教师在常识部分的大多数领域的知识水平明显更高。如果教师对LD有足够的了解,这将大大增加LDs患儿早期发现并接受所需治疗的机会。需要定期进行教师教育计划和讲习班,以提高教师对SLD的了解。
    UNASSIGNED: Specific learning disability (SLD) is a cognitive neurobiological disorder caused by atypical brain functioning. SLD is recognized when the individual\'s achievement in school is below that expected for age, schooling, and level of intelligence. Screening millions of students with SLD by health personnel is a logistical impossibility. Awareness and knowledge about learning disorders among schoolteachers may play a major role in the early identification and management of children with these disorders. Therefore, the assessment of teachers\' knowledge and perceptions about learning disabilities (LDs) is relevant.
    UNASSIGNED: A school-based cross-sectional study was conducted among teachers in government/government-aided and private schools in Vellore, India. The participants were selected by a simple random sampling method. There was a total of 80 teachers included in the study. Data capture was done using a questionnaire. A Chi-square test was done to test the association and the odds ratio test helped determine the strength of the association. A P-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: The majority of the teachers (70%) had adequate general knowledge regarding LDs. When analyzed separately, 82.5% of government/aided teachers and only 57.5% of teachers were having adequate general knowledge regarding LDs. There was a significant association between the type of school and general knowledge regarding LDs. Government/aided teachers had better general knowledge regarding LDs and dyslexia than private teachers.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 80 teachers, 70% (56) of them had adequate general knowledge regarding LDs. When analyzed separately, 82.5% (33) of government/aided teachers and only 57.5% (23) teachers were having adequate general knowledge regarding LDs. The government/aided schoolteachers had significantly higher levels of knowledge in most domains of the general knowledge section as compared to private schoolteachers. If teachers are having adequate knowledge regarding LDs, it will significantly increase the chances of children with LDs getting detected early and undergoing the treatment they require. Teacher education programs and workshops are needed to be conducted at regular intervals to improve the knowledge regarding SLDs among teachers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    手写障碍(HD)在学龄儿童中普遍存在,对学术表现有重大干扰。目前的研究提供了一种跨学科的方法,使用规范和标准化的神经精神运动的临床评估,神经心理和动眼功能。目的是为更好地了解HDs的性质和病因提供客观数据。对27名患有HD(一至五年级)的学龄儿童进行了这些临床评估的数据进行了分析。结果强调了表现HDs的儿童的高度异质性,与许多经常未知的共同事件。然而,根据BHK评分可以突出显示三个级别的HD:BHK测试未检测到的轻度HD(26%的儿童),中度HD(33%)和书写困难(41%的儿童)。BHK测试未检测到的HD的轻度性质似乎在临床评估期间鉴定的相关疾病的相对低频率下发生。相反,书写困难似乎与临床评估中确定的高频率的共同发生的疾病有关,以动眼障碍为主(55%的儿童),导致视觉感知困难和高水平的笔迹恶化。最后,患有中度HD的儿童比患有书写困难的儿童少,但比轻度HD儿童有更多的困难。这凸显了区分不同程度的HD的重要性,这些HD不响应相同的符号。我们的研究结果支持了以发育标准(神经精神运动,HD儿童的神经心理学和动眼运动)。的确,因此,HD可能与许多不同性质的疾病有关,从图形运动手势的协调不良到影响感知运动的更普遍和更复杂的损害,认知和/或心理情感功能。
    Handwriting disorders (HDs) are prevalent in school-aged children, with significant interference with academic performances. The current study offers a transdisciplinary approach with the use of normed and standardized clinical assessments of neuropsychomotor, neuropsychological and oculomotor functions. The aim is to provide objective data for a better understanding of the nature and the etiology of HDs. Data from these clinical assessments were analyzed for 27 school-aged children with HD (first to fifth grade). The results underline a high heterogeneity of the children presenting HDs, with many co-occurrences often unknown. However, it was possible to highlight three levels of HDs based on BHK scores: mild HD not detected by the BHK test (26% of children), moderate HD (33%) and dysgraphia (41% of children). The mild nature of the HDs not detected by the BHK test appears to occur at a relatively low frequency of the associated disorders identified during clinical evaluations. On the contrary, dysgraphia appears to be associated with a high frequency of co-occurring disorders identified in the clinical assessment, with a predominance of oculomotor disorders (55% of children), leading to visual-perceptual difficulties and a high level of handwriting deterioration. Finally, children with moderate HD have fewer co-occurrences than children with dysgraphia, but have more difficulties than children with mild HD. This highlights the importance of differentiating between different degrees of HDs that do not respond to the same semiologies. Our findings support the interest in performing a transdisciplinary and standardized clinical examination with developmental standards (neuropsychomotor, neuropsychological and oculomotor) in children with HD. Indeed, HDs can therefore be associated with a multitude of disorders of different natures ranging from poor coordination of the graphomotor gesture to a more general and more complex impairment affecting perceptual-motor, cognitive and/or psycho-affective functions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在瑞士,精神运动疗法(PMT)是一种标准的治疗有图形运动障碍的儿童,但它的有效性的科学证据是罕见的。为了调查PMT的有效性,我们进行了一项随机现场试验(RFT).样本由121名一年级和二年级学生组成,其中一些符合发育协调障碍的标准,而其余的则患有发育障碍。治疗持续超过5个月。在数字化平板电脑上测量了五次手写流畅度和一致性。所有参与的孩子都完成了自我概念访谈,和标准化的精细电机性能测试两次。与等待组相比,精神运动疗法显着改善了治疗组的精细运动技能。然而,没有证据表明接受治疗的孩子比等待的孩子在图形运动技能方面有更多的改善,例如频率,自动性,和形成字母的一致性。最后,治疗组的孩子在手写自我概念方面表现出部分改善,而等待组的孩子保持稳定。这种短期RFT证明了PMT在精细运动技能和笔迹自我概念的某些方面的有效性,但对笔迹流畅性和一致性没有影响。
    In Switzerland, psychomotor therapy (PMT) is a standard treatment for children with graphomotor impairments, but scientific evidence of its effectiveness is rare. To investigate the effectiveness of PMT, we conducted a randomised field trial (RFT). The sample consisted of 121 first and second graders with graphomotor impairments, some of whom met the criteria of developmental coordination disorder, while the remaining suffered from developmental dysgraphia. The treatments lasted over 5 months. Handwriting fluency and consistency were measured five times on a digitising tablet. All participating children completed a self-concept interview, and a standardised fine motor performance test twice. Psychomotor therapy significantly improved the fine motor skills of the therapy group compared to those of the waiting group. However, there was no evidence that the treated children improved more than the waiting children in terms of their graphomotor skills such as frequency, automaticity, and consistency of forming letters. Finally, the children of the therapy group showed partial improvements in their handwriting self-concept, while those of the waiting group children remained stable. This short-term RFT demonstrated the effectiveness of PMT in terms of fine motor skills and some aspects of the handwriting self-concept but showed no effects on handwriting fluency and consistency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号