dual therapy

双重疗法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    感染性糖尿病伤口提出了重大挑战,以炎症为特征,感染,和延迟的伤口愈合,导致发病率和死亡率升高。在这项工作中,我们开发了一种含有槲皮素的多功能脂质纳米乳液,氯e6和迷迭香油(QCRLNEs)用于双重抗炎和抗菌光动力疗法(APDT),用于治疗感染性糖尿病伤口。QCRLNE表现出51nm大小的球形形态,具有增强的封装效率,皮肤渗透,并在受感染的伤口部位进行局部递送。具有NIR辐射的QCRLNE在体外显示出优异的伤口闭合和抗菌性能,减轻PDT的非选择性细胞毒性行为。此外,在斑马鱼模型中观察到优异的生物相容性以及抗炎和伤口愈合反应。在金黄色葡萄球菌感染的糖尿病大鼠模型中,感染的伤口愈合特性表明上皮重新形成和胶原蛋白沉积,没有炎症迹象。这种使用QCRLNE和NIR照射的多方面方法对于有效对抗氧化应激和通常与感染的糖尿病伤口相关的细菌感染具有巨大的前景。促进伤口愈合和改善临床结果。
    Infectious diabetic wounds present a substantial challenge, characterized by inflammation, infection, and delayed wound healing, leading to elevated morbidity and mortality rates. In this work, we developed a multifunctional lipid nanoemulsion containing quercetin, chlorine e6, and rosemary oil (QCRLNEs) for dual anti-inflammatory and antibacterial photodynamic therapy (APDT) for treating infectious diabetic wounds. The QCRLNEs exhibited spherical morphology with a size of 51 nm with enhanced encapsulation efficiency, skin permeation, and localized delivery at the infected wound site. QCRLNEs with NIR irradiation have shown excellent wound closure and antimicrobial properties in vitro, mitigating the nonselective cytotoxic behavior of PDT. Also, excellent biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory and wound healing responses were observed in zebrafish models. The infected wound healing properties in S. aureus-infected diabetic rat models indicated re-epithelization and collagen deposition with no signs of inflammation. This multifaceted approach using QCRLNEs with NIR irradiation holds great promise for effectively combating oxidative stress and bacterial infections commonly associated with infected diabetic wounds, facilitating enhanced wound healing and improved clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:指南推荐开始双重联合抗高血压治疗,优选单药丸组合(SPC),在大多数高血压患者中。关于缩小临床实践与指南差距的证据有限。
    结果:蒙特卡罗模拟应用于110万名符合双重联合治疗资格的患者,这些患者来自先前进行的临床实践回顾性分析,医院统计,和英国的国家统计数据。我们提供了主要终点的10年Kaplan-Meier事件发生率,代表非致死性心肌梗死的复合终点,非致命性中风(缺血性或出血性),非致命性心力衰竭住院或心血管死亡。先前进行的研究的Cox模型结果用于估计基线风险,结合降血压治疗试验者合作(BPLTTC)荟萃分析和发表的关于降血压治疗疗效的证据,降低风险.在总人口中,在单药治疗持续100%的患者中,估计10年主要终点事件发生率厄贝沙坦(I)为17.0%,雷米普利(R)为17.6%.这些比率仅略高于临床实践中观察到的比率(17.8%)。在100%坚持双重治疗的患者中,厄贝沙坦+氨氯地平组合的估计事件发生率为13.6%(与未治疗相比,ARR=8.7%),雷米普利+氨氯地平的估计事件发生率为14.3%(与未治疗相比,ARR=8.0%).主要终点的绝对风险在ASCVD患者中降低15.9%,在无ASCVD患者中降低6.6%。同样,糖尿病患者的绝对风险降低了11.7%,无糖尿病患者的绝对风险降低了7.8%.
    结论:本研究首次对高血压患者进行了基于指南的治疗研究,并通过确保在临床实践中推荐的双重治疗,证明了大大降低风险的机会。特别是以具有高持久性的SPC形式,相对于没有治疗或单一疗法。
    OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend initiation of dual combination antihypertensive therapy, preferably single-pill combination (SPC), in most patients with hypertension. Evidence on narrowing gaps in clinical practice relative to guidelines is limited.
    RESULTS: Monte Carlo simulation was applied to 1.1 million patients qualifying for dual combination therapy from a previously conducted retrospective analysis of clinical practice, hospital statistics, and national statistics in the UK. We provide 10-year Kaplan-Meier event rates for the primary endpoint representing a composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), nonfatal heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death. Cox model results from a previously conducted study were utilized to estimate baseline risk, together with evidence on risk reduction from the Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists\' Collaboration (BPLTTC) meta-analysis and published evidence on BP-lowering efficacy of antihypertensive therapies. In the overall population, estimated 10-year event rates for the primary endpoint in patients with 100% persistence in monotherapy were 17.0% for irbesartan (I) and 17.6% for ramipril (R). These rates were only modestly better than that observed in clinical practice (17.8%). In patients with 100% persistence in dual therapy, estimated event rates were 13.6% for combinations of Irbesartan + Amlodipine (ARR = 8.7% compared to untreated) and 14.3% for Ramipril + Amlodipine (ARR = 8.0% compared to untreated). The absolute risk of the primary endpoint was reduced by 15.9% in patients with ASCVD and 6.6% in those without ASCVD. Similarly, the absolute risk was reduced by 11.7% in diabetics and 7.8% in those without diabetes.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first to investigate guidelines-based treatment in hypertensive patients and demonstrates the opportunity for considerable risk reduction by ensuring recommended dual therapy in clinical practice, particularly in the form of SPC with high persistence, relative to no treatment or monotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在根除幽门螺杆菌的双重疗法中使用的阿莫西林剂量在不同的研究中存在差异,并且对于基于vonoprazan的双重疗法的最佳阿莫西林剂量仍不清楚。我们旨在研究低和高剂量阿莫西林在伏诺拉赞-阿莫西林双重治疗中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:通过搜索数据库从开始到2023年10月进行了全面的系统评价。包括所有评价沃诺拉赞-阿莫西林双重疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的有效性和安全性的试验。汇集根除率,不良事件的发生率,相对风险,并给出了95%的置信区间。
    结果:18项研究包括12个低剂量阿莫西林(VLA)和13个高剂量阿莫西林(VHA)组。VLA治疗的合并根除率分别为82.4%和86.8%,通过意向治疗和符合方案分析,VHA治疗占86.0%和90.9%,分别。在按持续时间分层的亚组分析中,7天内达到的根除率,10天,VLA和VHA双重疗法治疗14天的比例为80.8%,84.2%,83.1%,和67.3%,88.8%,87.5%,分别。在直接比较VLA和VHA双重疗法的四项随机对照试验中,意向治疗的疗效无统计学差异(76.9%vs81.4%,p=0.337)和每个协议(81.6%vs84.0%,p=0.166)分析。此外,两组的不良事件发生率(p=0.965)和依从性(p=0.994)相似.
    结论:VLA治疗与VHA治疗具有相当的疗效和安全性,以及地区差异。适当延长的治疗持续时间对于优化vonoprazan-阿莫西林治疗的治疗效果至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: The amoxicillin dose used in dual therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori varies across studies and the optimal amoxicillin dose for vonoprazan-based dual therapies remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose amoxicillin in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy.
    METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted by searching databases from inception to October 2023. All trials that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy for eradicating H. pylori were included. Pooled eradication rate, incidence of adverse events, relative risks, and 95% confidence intervals are presented.
    RESULTS: Eighteen studies with 12 low-dose amoxicillin (VLA) and 13 high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) arms were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.4% and 86.8% for VLA therapy, and 86.0% and 90.9% for VHA therapy by the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. In the subgroup analysis stratified by duration, the eradication rates achieved in 7 days, 10 days, and 14 days treatments with VLA and VHA dual therapies were 80.8%, 84.2%, 83.1%, and 67.3%, 88.8%, 87.5%, respectively. In the four randomized controlled trials that directly compared VLA and VHA dual therapies, the efficacy was not statistically different in the intention-to-treat (76.9% vs 81.4%, p = 0.337) and per-protocol (81.6% vs 84.0%, p = 0.166) analyses. Additionally, the incidence of adverse events (p = 0.965) and compliance (p = 0.994) were similar in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: VLA therapy demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to VHA therapy, along with regional differences. An appropriately extended treatment duration may be critical for therapeutic optimization of vonoprazan-amoxicillin treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有人类免疫缺陷病毒(PLWH)的人正在变老。PLWH中与年龄相关的合并症导致多重用药,并增加潜在药物-药物相互作用(pDDIs)的风险。这项研究旨在评估如果接受不同联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(ARTs)的患者的治疗理论上使用dolutegravir/拉米夫定(DTG3TC)或cabotegravir/riilpivirine(CABRPV)改变,则pDDIs的发生率将如何变化。
    这项研究是在大学医院的传染病门诊进行的,作为先前研究的随访。回顾性分析了接受至少1例抗逆转录病毒药物(ARVs)以外的其他治疗的PLWH的数据。Drugs.com/药物相互作用检查器和利物浦大学HIV药物相互作用检查器数据库用于识别pDDI及其严重程度。
    总共75PLWH,其中83%是男性,平均年龄(±标准差)为46.5(±12.98)岁。在59名(79%)的参与者中观察到多重用药;然而,有双ARV选项,多重用药的可能性为35(47%)(p<0.001).在Drugs.com数据库中,在当前ARTs(64%)和DTG/3TC(%44)(p=0.06)或CAB/RPV(%64)(p=0.521)的治疗之间,pDDIs没有发现显著差异.然而,在利物浦大学的数据库中,与DTG/3TC的理论治疗(40%)相比,PDDI的当前比率(55%)明显更高(p=0.029),口服CAB/RPV(48%)(p=0.003),和可注射CAB/RPV(31%)使用(p=0.006)。
    结果表明,双重治疗方案可以减少pDDIs,导致PLWH更好的耐受性和可能更高的生活质量。
    UNASSIGNED: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are getting older. Age-related comorbidities in PLWH result in polypharmacy and increase the risk for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study aimed to evaluate how the rate of pDDIs would change if the treatment of patients receiving different combined antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) were theoretically changed with dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG+3TC) or cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB+RPV).
    UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted at the infectious disease outpatient clinic of a university hospital as a follow-up of a previous study. The data of PLWH receiving at least 1 comedication other than antiretrovirals (ARVs) were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The Drugs.com/Drug Interactions Checker and University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions Checker databases were used to identify pDDIs and their severities.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 PLWH, of whom 83% were male, with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 46.5 (±12.98) years were included. Polypharmacy was observed in 59 (79%) of the participants; however, with dual ARV options, the probability of polypharmacy was 35 (47%) (p < 0.001). In the Drugs.com database, no significant difference was found in terms of pDDIs between the treatment of current ARTs (64%) and DTG/3TC (%44) (p = 0.06) or CAB/RPV (%64) (p = 0.521). However, in the University of Liverpool database, the current rate of pDDIs (55%) was significantly higher compared to the theoretical treatment of DTG/3TC (40%) (p = 0.029), oral CAB/RPV (48%) (p = 0.003), and injectable CAB/RPV (31%) use (p = 0.006).
    UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that dual treatment regimens can reduce pDDIs, resulting in better tolerance and probably higher quality of life among PLWH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在评估vonoprazan-阿莫西林(VA)的疗效和安全性,vonoprazan-阿莫西林-克拉霉素(VAC),基于vonoprazan的含铋四联疗法(VBQT),和基于PPI的三联疗法(PAC)或四联疗法(PBQT)用于幽门螺杆菌感染,同时考虑治疗持续时间和阿莫西林剂量(H:高;L:低)。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,我们在Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心中搜索了截至2023年12月15日的符合条件的随机对照试验(RCT).疗效结果为根除率,安全性结局包括不良事件发生率和治疗中止率.
    结果:纳入了27个随机对照试验。VA的合并根除率为82.8%,VAC为89.1%,VBQT为91.8%,随着阿莫西林给药频率的增加和每种方案治疗持续时间的延长而增加。比较7-VA与7-VAC和14-VA与14-VAC时,根除率没有显着差异。VA至少与PAC相当。10-H-VA或14-H-VA与14-PBQT的根除率没有显着差异。与7-PAC相比,7-L-VAC的根除率更高,与14-PAC的根除率相当。与14-PBQT相比,14-VBQT显示更高的根除率。VA的不良事件发生率为19.3%,VAC为30.6%,VBQT为38.4%。与VAC相比,VA具有相似的不良事件风险,与PBQT相比,不良事件明显减少。治疗中止率在治疗之间没有显着差异。
    结论:VBQT的根除率最高,达90%以上,其次是VAC和VA。VA与VAC一样有效,优于基于PPI的治疗,具有良好的安全性,强调VA治疗作为传统PPI治疗的有希望的替代方案的潜力。基于VPZ的三联或四联疗法比基于PPI的疗法更有效。需要进一步的研究来建立最佳的治疗方案,尤其是在西方国家。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA), vonoprazan-amoxicillin-clarithromycin (VAC), vonoprazan-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBQT), and PPI-based triple (PAC) or quadruple therapy (PBQT) for H. pylori infection with the consideration of duration of therapy and amoxicillin dose (H: high; L: low).
    METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to December 15, 2023. The efficacy outcome was eradication rate, and safety outcomes included the rates of adverse events and treatment discontinuation.
    RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs were included. The pooled eradication rates were 82.8% for VA, 89.1% for VAC, and 91.8% for VBQT, which increased with the higher amoxicillin frequency of administration and extended duration of therapy within each regimen. There were no significant differences in eradication rate when comparing 7-VA versus 7-VAC and 14-VA versus 14-VAC. VA was at least comparable to PAC. The eradication rate did not differ significantly between 10-H-VA or 14-H-VA versus 14-PBQT. 7-L-VAC demonstrated higher eradication rate versus 7-PAC and comparable rate to 14-PAC. 14-VBQT showed higher eradication rates versus 14-PBQT. The adverse events rate was 19.3% for VA, 30.6% for VAC, and 38.4% for VBQT. VA had similar risk of adverse events versus VAC and significantly fewer adverse events compared to PBQT. The treatment discontinuation rate did not differ significantly between treatments.
    CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of VBQT was the highest at above 90% followed by VAC and VA. VA was as effective as VAC and superior to PPI-based therapies with favorable safety, highlighting the potential of VA therapy as a promising alternative to traditional PPI-based therapies. VPZ-based triple or quadruple therapies was more effective than PPI-based therapies. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment regimen especially in the western countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌血症是一种严重的临床感染,具有很高的死亡风险。双重疗法通常用于持续性菌血症患者。目的:本研究旨在比较万古霉素或达托霉素单药治疗与头孢洛林双药治疗高级别或持续性MRSA菌血症的疗效。方法:我们于2014年1月至2021年6月在一所大学教学医院进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入最初接受万古霉素或达托霉素治疗的成年人。将患者分为单一疗法和双重疗法组。主要结果是30天死亡率。次要结果包括微生物复发和抗生素相关不良事件。结果:在一组155名患者中,单药治疗组(23.4%)和双药治疗组(22.6%)30天死亡率相似,微生物复发率相当(6.5%)。在治疗权重分析的逆概率中,我们发现双重治疗与死亡率(校正风险比[ARR]1.38,95%CI0.64~2.41,P=0.38)或微生物学复发(ARR0.95,95%CI0.31~2.73,P=0.93)无显著相关性.双重治疗与抗生素相关不良事件的风险较低相关(ARR0.45,95%CI0.21-0.89,P=0.02)。传染病(ID)咨询与死亡率风险降低相关(ARR0.27,95%CI0.07-0.95,P=0.04)。结论:在MRSA菌血症患者中,头孢洛林双重治疗与单药治疗相比并不能降低死亡风险。然而,接受ID咨询的患者死亡率降低了73%.大规模,prospective,对于头孢洛林双重疗法治疗MRSA菌血症的潜在益处,需要进行随机对照试验以提供确凿证据.
    Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical infection associated with a high risk of mortality. Dual therapy is often used in patients with persistent bacteremia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy with those of dual therapy with ceftaroline in high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university teaching hospital between January 2014 and June 2021, involving adults initially treated with vancomycin or daptomycin. Patients were categorized into monotherapy and dual therapy groups. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiological relapse and antibiotic-related adverse events. Results: In a group of 155 patients, 30-day mortality rates were similar between the monotherapy (23.4%) and dual therapy (22.6%) groups, with comparable microbiological relapse rates (6.5%). In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, we found no significant association between dual therapy and mortality (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.64-2.41, P = 0.38) or microbiological relapse (ARR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31-2.73, P = 0.93). Dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of antibiotic-related adverse events (ARR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Infectious diseases (ID) consultation was associated with a reduced mortality risk (ARR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Dual therapy with ceftaroline did not reduce mortality risk compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia. However, patients with ID consultations showed a 73% reduction in mortality rates. Large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence regarding the potential benefits of dual therapy with ceftaroline for MRSA bacteremia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细菌感染是全球健康问题,特别是由于细菌对抗生素的耐药性增加。多重耐药性(MDR)是一个相当大的挑战,并且需要新的方法来治疗细菌感染。微生物的光动力灭活(PDI)越来越被认为是灭活广谱细菌和克服抗性机制的有效方法。这项研究介绍了一种新的阳离子5,15-二咪唑基卟啉衍生物的合成以及该类光敏剂的正辛醇/水分配系数(logP)值对大肠杆菌PDI功效的影响。logP=-0.5的导数,IP-H-OH2+,在415nm的光剂量仅为1.36J/cm2的情况下,在100nM时,大肠杆菌的CFU显著减少了3log,效果是第二好的卟啉IP-H-Me2+的两倍,logP=-1.35。我们将大肠杆菌对IP-H-OH2的快速摄取与改善的PDI和氟化衍生物的极低摄取联系起来,IP-H-CF32+,logP≈1,表现不佳。PDI与肉桂醛的组合,肉桂植物的主要成分,已知会改变细菌细胞膜,提供了大肠杆菌的协同灭活作用(7logCFU减少),使用50nM的IP-H-OH2+和仅1.36J/cm2的光剂量。PDI与这种天然化合物结合的成功扩大了MDR感染的治疗范围,而不会增加耐药性。对伤口感染小鼠模型的体内研究表明阳离子5,15-二-咪唑基卟啉治疗临床相关感染伤口的潜力。
    Bacterial infections are a global health concern, particularly due to the increasing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is a considerable challenge, and novel approaches are needed to treat bacterial infections. Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of microorganisms is increasingly recognized as an effective method to inactivate a broad spectrum of bacteria and overcome resistance mechanisms. This study presents the synthesis of a new cationic 5,15-di-imidazolyl porphyrin derivative and the impact of n-octanol/water partition coefficient (logP) values of this class of photosensitizers on PDI efficacy of Escherichia coli. The derivative with logP = -0.5, IP-H-OH2+, achieved a remarkable 3 log CFU reduction of E. coli at 100 nM with only 1.36 J/cm2 light dose at 415 nm, twice as effective as the second-best porphyrin IP-H-Me2+, of logP = -1.35. We relate the rapid uptake of IP-H-OH2+ by E. coli to improved PDI and the very low uptake of a fluorinated derivative, IP-H-CF32+, logP ≈ 1, to its poor performance. Combination of PDI with cinnamaldehyde, a major component of the cinnamon plant known to alter bacteria cell membranes, offered synergic inactivation of E. coli (7 log CFU reduction), using 50 nM of IP-H-OH2+ and just 1.36 J/cm2 light dose. The success of combining PDI with this natural compound broadens the scope of therapies for MDR infections that do not add drug resistance. In vivo studies on a mouse model of wound infection showed the potential of cationic 5,15-di-imidazolyl porphyrins to treat clinically relevant infected wounds.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:比较万诺拉赞(VPZ)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)标准四联治疗根除海南幽门螺杆菌(Hp)感染的潜在疗效和安全性。
    方法:单中心,非致盲,非劣效性随机对照试验于2022年6月至2023年2月在海南医科大学第二附属医院消化内科门诊进行.纳入135例年龄在18-75岁之间的Hp感染患者,并随机分为三个不同的组(V1组:VPZ20mg,每天两次,阿莫西林1.0g,每天三次,共14天V2:vonoprazan20mg,阿莫西林胶囊1.0g,呋喃唑酮0.1克和柠檬酸钾铋240毫克,每天两次,共14天;V3组:艾普拉唑5mg,阿莫西林1.0g,呋喃唑酮100毫克,柠檬酸钾铋240毫克,每天两次,共14天)。治疗结束四周后,通过重新检查13C-尿素呼气试验(UBT)确认Hp根除。
    结果:V1和V3的根除功效不劣于V2,这与从Kruskal-WallisH检验获得的结果一致。有意分析的根除率为84.4%(38/45,95CI73.4%-95.5%,三组均P>0.05)。如果按协议分析,根除率为88.4%(38/43,95CI78.4%-98.4%),92.7%(38/41,95CI84.4%-101.0%),V1、V2和V3组分别为88.4%(38/43,95CI78.4%-98.4%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与其他两种治疗方案相比,VPZ双重治疗方案的不良反应发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。VPZ双重疗法或四联疗法也比标准四联疗法成本相对较低。
    结论:VPZ双重疗法和四联疗法有望在临床相关方面不会比标准四联疗法差。可能需要更多的研究来确定新疗法是否同样有效甚至更优越。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the potential efficacy and safety of dual therapy and quadruple therapy with vonoprazan (VPZ) as well as the standard quadruple therapy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in Hainan province.
    METHODS: A single-centre, non-blinded, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient department of gastroenterology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from June 2022 to February 2023. 135 patients aged 18-75 years with Hp infection were enrolled and randomized into three different groups (group V1: VPZ 20 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 1.0 g three times a day for 14 days V2: vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1.0 g, furazolidone 0.1 g and bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice daily for 14 days;; group V3: ilaprazole 5 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Furazolidone 100 mg, bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice a day for 14 days). Four weeks after the end of treatment, Hp eradication was confirmed by rechecking 13C-urea breath test (UBT).
    RESULTS: The eradication efficacy of V1 and V3 was non-inferior to that of V2, which is consistent with the results obtained from the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The eradication rate by intentional analysis was 84.4% (38/45, 95%CI 73.4%-95.5%, P>0.05) for all the three groups. If analyzed by per-protocol, the eradication rates were 88.4% (38/43, 95%CI 78.4%-98.4%), 92.7% (38/41, 95%CI 84.4%-101.0%),88.4% (38/43,95%CI 78.4%-98.4%) in groups V1, V2 and V3, respectively, which did not show a significant difference (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower in VPZ dual therapy compared to the other two treatment regimens (P < 0.05). VPZ dual therapy or quadruple therapy was also relatively less costly than standard quadruple therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: VPZ dual therapy and quadruple therapy shows promise of not being worse than the standard quadruple therapy by a clinically relevant margin. More studies might be needed to definitively determine if the new therapy is equally effective or even superior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管坚持吸入性皮质类固醇/长效β2激动剂(ICS/LABA)治疗,许多哮喘患者经历中度加重。有关中度恶化对医疗保健系统影响的数据有限。这项研究评估了接受ICS/LABA的患者中度加重的频率和经济负担。
    方法:回顾性,纵向研究分析了Optum在2015年10月1日至2019年12月31日期间记录的数据。合格标准包括年龄≥18岁的患者,在12个月的预指数(首次ICS/LABA索赔)中,有≥1项ICS/LABA索赔和≥1项哮喘医疗索赔。主要目标包括描述中度加重频率,以及相关的医疗资源利用率(HRU)和成本。次要目标是评估中度加重与随后严重加重风险之间的关系。在指数后的12个月内,按中度加重频率对患者进行分层。使用新开发的算法确定中度加重。
    结果:在指标后的前12个月,61.6%的患者经历了≥1次中度加重。哮喘相关就诊的平均次数为每人每年4.1次,哮喘相关总费用中位数为3544美元。HRU和费用随着加重频率的增加而增加。门诊和住院就诊占这些费用的比例相似。中度加重与未来严重加重的发生率和风险增加相关(发生率比,1.56;危险比,1.51[均p<0.001])。
    结论:这项研究强调,尽管接受ICS/LABA治疗,仍有很大比例的患者继续经历中度加重,随后经历经济负担和未来严重加重的风险增加。
    BACKGROUND: Despite adherence to inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, many patients with asthma experience moderate exacerbations. Data on the impact of moderate exacerbations on the healthcare system are limited. This study assessed the frequency and economic burden of moderate exacerbations in patients receiving ICS/LABA.
    METHODS: Retrospective, longitudinal study analyzed data from Optum\'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database recorded between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Eligibility criteria included patients ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICS/LABA claim and ≥1 medical claim for asthma in the 12 months pre-index (first ICS/LABA claim). Primary objectives included describing moderate exacerbation frequency, and associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. A secondary objective was assessing the relationship between moderate exacerbations and subsequent risk of severe exacerbations. Patients were stratified by moderate exacerbation frequency in the 12 months post index. Moderate exacerbations were identified using a newly developed algorithm.
    RESULTS: In the first 12 months post index 61.6% of patients experienced ≥1 moderate exacerbation. Mean number of asthma-related visits was 4.1 per person/year and median total asthma-related costs was $3544. HRU and costs increased with increasing exacerbation frequency. Outpatient and inpatient visits accounted for a similar proportion of these costs. Moderate exacerbations were associated with an increased rate and risk of future severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.56; hazard ratio, 1.51 [both p < 0.001]).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that a high proportion of patients continue to experience moderate exacerbations despite ICS/LABA therapy and subsequently experience increased economic burden and risk of future severe exacerbations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号