BACKGROUND: The efficacy of Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VAT) in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of VAT in the Chinese population.
METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, and two-stage study was conducted at 23 centers in Fujian, China (May 2021-April 2022). H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT), BQT-Vonoprazan (BQT-V), seven-day VAT (VAT-7), ten-day VAT (VAT-10), and fourteen-day VAT (VAT-14) groups. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoint was the frequency of adverse events. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100045778.
RESULTS: In the first stage, VAT-7 and BQT-V groups were selected for early termination because less than 23 among 28 cases were eradicated. In the second stage, the eradication rates for BQT, VAT-10, and VA-14 were 80.2% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 71.4%-86.8%], 93.2% (86.6%-96.7%), 92.2% (85.3%-96.0%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, and 80.9% (95%CI: 71.7%-87.5%), 94.0% (87.5%-97.2%), and 93.9% (87.4%-97.2%) in the per-protocol analysis. The ITT analysis showed a higher eradication rate in the VAT-10 and VAT-14 groups than in the BQT group (P = 0.022 and P = 0.046, respectively). The incidence of adverse events in the VAT-10 and VAT-14 groups was lower than in the BQT group (25.27% and 13.73% vs 37.62%, respectively; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: VAT with a duration of 10 or 14 days achieves a higher eradication rate than the BQT, with a more tolerable safety profile in H. pylori-infected patients in Fujian.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the long-term effects on immune parameters, inflammation, and HIV-1 reservoir after switching to a two-drug (2DR) versus maintaining an integrase inhibitor (InSTI)-based three-drug regimen (3DR).
UNASSIGNED: Cross-sectional study in which HIV-1 treatment-naïve people started and maintained an InSTI-based 3DR or, at different times, switched to 2DR (dolutegravir or darunavir/cobicistat + lamivudine). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation and exhaustion, plasma concentrations of hs-CRP, D-dimer, P-selectin, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IP-10, sTNFR-I/II, MIP-1α/β, I-FABP, LBP, sCD14, sCD163, MCP-1, and cellular-associated HIV-1-DNA and -RNA were quantified by flow cytometry, different immunoassays, and droplet digital PCR, respectively. The U de Mann-Whitney test evaluated differences between 3DR and 2DR. Immune recovery was evaluated using a general linear model for repeated measures adjusted for different co-variables.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty participants per group were included. The median time on 3DR was 82 months for the 3DR group and 30 months for the 2DR group, after which it switched to 2DR for a median of 57 months. We did not find differences between both groups in any of the parameters analyzed. Specifically, some values in 3DR and 2DR were hs-CRP, 0.92 mg/L (0.45-2.23) vs. 1.23 (0.61-2.38); D-dimer, 190.0 µg/L (150.0-370.0) vs. 190.0 (150.0-397.5); IL-6, 2.8 pg/mL (1.3-5.3) vs. 3.2 (2.1-4.7); sCD14, 4.5 ng/mL (3.3-6.2) vs. 5.0 (3.6-6.1), respectively, all p ≥ 0.399.
UNASSIGNED: In the long term, switching to 2DR does not negatively affect immunologic parameters, inflammatory markers, or HIV-1 reservoir.
UNASSIGNED: identifier NCT04076423.

BACKGROUND: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has transformed HIV management, with various regimens available. Dolutegravir (DTG) plus lamivudine (3TC) dual therapy is now the one of the first line regimens.
METHODS: A retrospective, observational study included treatment naïve people living with HIV (PLWH) with baseline HIV RNA viral load (VL) greater than 500,000 copies/mL from March 2020 to June 2022. PLWH on DTG + 3TC were included in the 2DR group, while others on INSTI-based three-drug regimens were divided in the 3DR group. Viral suppression, immunological recovery, and safety were assessed.
RESULTS: The study included 52 PLWH, with no significant baseline differences. Virologic suppression rates at weeks 24 and 48 were similar in both groups, even with baseline HIV RNA VL greater than 1,000,000 copies/mL. CD4 + T cell counts improved rapidly. No serious adverse effects were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: DTG + 3TC dual therapy demonstrates effectiveness in treatment naïve PLWH with high baseline HIV RNA VL, suggesting its potential as a first line regimen for all treatment naïve PLWH.

UNASSIGNED: People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) are getting older. Age-related comorbidities in PLWH result in polypharmacy and increase the risk for potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs). This study aimed to evaluate how the rate of pDDIs would change if the treatment of patients receiving different combined antiretroviral therapies (ARTs) were theoretically changed with dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG+3TC) or cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB+RPV).
UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted at the infectious disease outpatient clinic of a university hospital as a follow-up of a previous study. The data of PLWH receiving at least 1 comedication other than antiretrovirals (ARVs) were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. The Drugs.com/Drug Interactions Checker and University of Liverpool HIV Drug Interactions Checker databases were used to identify pDDIs and their severities.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 75 PLWH, of whom 83% were male, with a mean age (± standard deviation) of 46.5 (±12.98) years were included. Polypharmacy was observed in 59 (79%) of the participants; however, with dual ARV options, the probability of polypharmacy was 35 (47%) (p < 0.001). In the Drugs.com database, no significant difference was found in terms of pDDIs between the treatment of current ARTs (64%) and DTG/3TC (%44) (p = 0.06) or CAB/RPV (%64) (p = 0.521). However, in the University of Liverpool database, the current rate of pDDIs (55%) was significantly higher compared to the theoretical treatment of DTG/3TC (40%) (p = 0.029), oral CAB/RPV (48%) (p = 0.003), and injectable CAB/RPV (31%) use (p = 0.006).
UNASSIGNED: The results suggest that dual treatment regimens can reduce pDDIs, resulting in better tolerance and probably higher quality of life among PLWH.

Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical infection associated with a high risk of mortality. Dual therapy is often used in patients with persistent bacteremia. Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vancomycin or daptomycin monotherapy with those of dual therapy with ceftaroline in high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a university teaching hospital between January 2014 and June 2021, involving adults initially treated with vancomycin or daptomycin. Patients were categorized into monotherapy and dual therapy groups. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiological relapse and antibiotic-related adverse events. Results: In a group of 155 patients, 30-day mortality rates were similar between the monotherapy (23.4%) and dual therapy (22.6%) groups, with comparable microbiological relapse rates (6.5%). In inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, we found no significant association between dual therapy and mortality (adjusted risk ratio [ARR] 1.38, 95% CI 0.64-2.41, P = 0.38) or microbiological relapse (ARR 0.95, 95% CI 0.31-2.73, P = 0.93). Dual therapy was associated with a lower risk of antibiotic-related adverse events (ARR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.89, P = 0.02). Infectious diseases (ID) consultation was associated with a reduced mortality risk (ARR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.95, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Dual therapy with ceftaroline did not reduce mortality risk compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia. However, patients with ID consultations showed a 73% reduction in mortality rates. Large-scale, prospective, and randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence regarding the potential benefits of dual therapy with ceftaroline for MRSA bacteremia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the potential efficacy and safety of dual therapy and quadruple therapy with vonoprazan (VPZ) as well as the standard quadruple therapy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in Hainan province.
METHODS: A single-centre, non-blinded, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient department of gastroenterology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from June 2022 to February 2023. 135 patients aged 18-75 years with Hp infection were enrolled and randomized into three different groups (group V1: VPZ 20 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 1.0 g three times a day for 14 days V2: vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin capsules 1.0 g, furazolidone 0.1 g and bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice daily for 14 days;; group V3: ilaprazole 5 mg, Amoxicillin 1.0 g, Furazolidone 100 mg, bismuth potassiulm citrate 240 mg, twice a day for 14 days). Four weeks after the end of treatment, Hp eradication was confirmed by rechecking 13C-urea breath test (UBT).
RESULTS: The eradication efficacy of V1 and V3 was non-inferior to that of V2, which is consistent with the results obtained from the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The eradication rate by intentional analysis was 84.4% (38/45, 95%CI 73.4%-95.5%, P>0.05) for all the three groups. If analyzed by per-protocol, the eradication rates were 88.4% (38/43, 95%CI 78.4%-98.4%), 92.7% (38/41, 95%CI 84.4%-101.0%),88.4% (38/43，95%CI 78.4%-98.4%) in groups V1, V2 and V3, respectively, which did not show a significant difference (P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse effects was significantly lower in VPZ dual therapy compared to the other two treatment regimens (P < 0.05). VPZ dual therapy or quadruple therapy was also relatively less costly than standard quadruple therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: VPZ dual therapy and quadruple therapy shows promise of not being worse than the standard quadruple therapy by a clinically relevant margin. More studies might be needed to definitively determine if the new therapy is equally effective or even superior.

In recent decades, peptide amphiphiles (PAs) have established themselves as promising self-assembling bioinspired materials in a wide range of medical fields. Herein, we report a dual-therapeutic system constituted by an antimicrobial PA and a cylindrical protease inhibitor (LJC) to achieve broad antimicrobial spectrum and to enhance therapeutic efficacy. We studied two strategies: PA-LJC nanostructures (Encapsulation) and PA nanostructures + free LJC (Combination). Computational modeling using a molecular theory for amphiphile self-assembly captures and explains the morphology of PA-LJC nanostructures and the location of encapsulated LJC in agreement with transmission electron microscopy and two-dimensional (2D) NMR observations. The morphology and release profile of PA-LJC assemblies are strongly correlated to the PA:LJC ratio: high LJC loading induces an initial burst release. We then evaluated the antimicrobial activity of our nanosystems toward gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. We found that the Combination broadens the spectrum of LJC, reduces the therapeutic concentrations of both agents, and is not impacted by the inoculum effect. Further, the Encapsulation provides additional benefits including bypassing water solubility limitations of LJC and modulating the release of this molecule. The different properties of PA-LJC nanostructures results in different killing profiles, and reduced cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity. Meanwhile, details in membrane alterations caused by each strategy were revealed by various microscopy and fluorescent techniques. Last, in vivo studies in larvae treated by the Encapsulation strategy showed better antimicrobial efficacy than polymyxin B. Collectively, this study established a multifunctional platform using a versatile PA to act as an antibiotic, membrane-penetrating assistant, and slow-release delivery vehicle.

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol; FF/UMEC/VI) has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a history of exacerbations. This real-world study compared exacerbation rates and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) before and after initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in patients with COPD previously treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D administrative claims data from September 01, 2016, to March 31, 2020, of patients diagnosed with COPD. The index date was the date of the first FF/UMEC/VI claim (September 2017-March 2019). The 12 months prior to index (baseline) were used to assess patient characteristics and outcomes; the 12 months following index (follow-up) were used to assess study outcomes. All patients had ≥ 30 consecutive days\' supply of any ICS/LABA dual therapy during the 12 months prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation. Subgroup analyses included patients with ≥ 30 consecutive days\' supply of budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FORM) during baseline. Analyses of patients with ≥ 1 COPD exacerbation during baseline were reported as well.
RESULTS: The overall population included 1449 patients (mean age 70.75 years; 54.18% female), of whom 540 were patients in the BUD/FORM subgroup. Significantly fewer patients experienced any exacerbation during follow-up versus baseline (overall population 53.49% vs 62.59%; p < 0.001; BUD/FORM subgroup 55.00% vs 62.41%; p = 0.004). Effects on exacerbation reduction were more pronounced among patients with ≥ 1 exacerbation during baseline. Lower COPD-related HCRU was observed during the follow-up compared with baseline for both the overall population and the BUD/FORM subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD treated with ICS/LABA during baseline, including patients specifically treated with BUD/FORM and those with a history of ≥ 1 exacerbation, had fewer COPD exacerbations and lower COPD-related HCRU after initiating FF/UMEC/VI.

UNASSIGNED: Previous trials investigating antithrombotic therapy with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and a P2Y12 inhibitor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), termed dual therapy, allowed a short period of triple therapy including a DOAC, a P2Y12 inhibitor, and aspirin.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to determine whether discontinuation of aspirin on the first post-procedural day is safe or causes ischemic events.
UNASSIGNED: Ischemic and bleeding events during hospitalization were investigated retrospectively in all patients treated with dual therapy (DOAC + P2Y12 inhibitor, designated as group 1) or triple therapy (DOAC + P2Y12 inhibitor+aspirin, designated as group 2) from day 1 after PCI at our center.
UNASSIGNED: Of 4,564 consecutive PCI procedures, 1,059 (23.2%) had an indication for OAC. Of these, 322 met the inclusion criteria for group 1 and 62 for group 2. Baseline characteristics, CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores showed no relevant differences between the two groups, and the main indication for DOAC therapy was atrial fibrillation in both groups. Approximately ¼ of patients were treated for acute coronary syndrome. The mean length of post-procedural hospitalization was 2.1 ± 2.5 and 2.2 ± 3.0 days in group 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.305). One patient per group suffered a TIA (p = 0.297). There were no other ischemic events and no statistically significant differences in bleeding events. A subgroup analysis of cases hospitalized for ≥2 post-procedural days (group 1: 100 cases, mean 4.4 ± 3.4 days vs. group 2: 25 cases, mean 4.0 ± 4.1 days) confirmed these results.
UNASSIGNED: The initiation of dual therapy and thus discontinuation of aspirin on the first postprocedural day appears to be safe with respect to short-term ischemic events in a real-world population. Almost ¼ of patients undergoing PCI have an indication for OAC, highlighting the relevance of this issue.

OBJECTIVE: We estimated the effect of early initiation of dual therapy vs monotherapy on drug administration and related outcomes in mechanically ventilated, critically ill children.
METHODS: We used the electronic medical record at a single tertiary medical center to conduct an active comparator, new user cohort study. We included children <18 years of age who were exposed to a sedative or analgesic within 6 hours of intubation. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for confounding at baseline. We estimated the average effect of initial dual therapy vs monotherapy on outcomes including cumulative opioid, benzodiazepine, and dexmedetomidine dosing; sedation scores; time to double the opioid or benzodiazepine infusion rate; initiation of neuromuscular blockade within the first 7 days of follow-up; time to extubation; and 7-day all-cause in-hospital death.
RESULTS: The cohort included 640 patients. Children receiving dual therapy received 0.03 mg/kg (95% CI, 0.02-0.04) more dexmedetomidine over the first 7 days after initiation of mechanical ventilation than did monotherapy patients. Dual therapy patients had similar sedation scores, time to double therapy, initiation of neuromuscular blockade, and time to extubation as monotherapy patients. Dual therapy patients had a lower incidence of death.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, initial dual therapy compared with monotherapy does not reduce overall drug administration during mechanical ventilation. The identified effect of dual therapy on mortality deserves further investigation.