背景:唐氏综合症(DS),或21三体,是由一个额外的21号染色体的存在来定义的。DS患者的各种生理考虑因素可能会导致手术后适当的疼痛管理和镇静方面的挑战。这项系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估与没有DS的患者相比,接受手术的DS患者的疼痛管理和镇静需求的变化。
方法:对研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,重点关注手术后入住重症监护病房(ICU)并接受阿片类药物和/或苯二氮卓类药物治疗的DS危重患者.从成立到2023年11月18日,在四个数据库中进行了搜索(Pubmed,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience)。测量的主要结果是手术后几天给予的口服吗啡当量(OME)的剂量。使用固定效应模型,当只有有限数量的研究可用时,这是一种可取的方法。
结果:在最初筛选的992项研究中,系统综述包括十项研究,包括730名患者,而荟萃分析由七项研究组成,包括533名患者。在分析中包含的七项研究中,298名患者被确定为患有DS,235名患者作为对照。DS患者第一天OME需求略有增加,但这种增加没有统计学意义(平均差异[MD]=0.09;95%置信区间[CI]:[-0.02,0.20];P=0.11).DS患者第一天对咪达唑仑的需求也没有显着差异(MD=0.01;CI[-0.16,0.19];P=0.88)。此外,与对照组相比,DS患者的机械通气持续时间无统计学意义(MD=-1.46小时;95%CI[-9.74,6.82];P=0.73).
结论:与没有唐氏综合征的患者相比,唐氏综合征患者在术后前三天不需要更多的镇静或镇痛。此外,两组在机械通气时间上无显著差异。
BACKGROUND: Down syndrome (DS), or Trisomy 21, is defined by the existence of an additional chromosome 21. Various physiological considerations in DS patients might lead to challenges in adequate pain management and sedation after surgery. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the variations of the requirement needed for pain management and sedation in patients with DS who have undergone surgery compared to patients without DS.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies were conducted, focusing on critically ill patients with DS who were admitted to Intensive care units (ICUs) post-surgery and received opioids and/or benzodiazepines. Searches were conducted in four databases from their inception to November 18, 2023 (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science). The primary outcome measured was the dosage of Oral Morphine Equivalent (OME) administered in the days following surgery. Fixed-effect models were used, an approach advisable when only a limited number of studies are available.
RESULTS: Out of the 992 studies initially screened, the systematic review included ten studies, encompassing 730 patients, while the meta-analysis consisted of seven studies, encompassing 533 patients. Of the seven studies included in the analysis, 298 patients were identified to have DS, and 235 patients served as controls. Patients with DS showed a slight increase in OME needs on the first day, but this increase was not statistically significant (mean difference [MD] = 0.09; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: [-0.02, 0.20]; P = 0.11). There was also no significant difference in the requirement for Midazolam on the first day among DS patients (MD = 0.01; CI [-0.16, 0.19]; P = 0.88). In addition, the duration of mechanical ventilation was not statistically significant in patients with DS compared with the control group (MD = -1.46 hours; 95% CI [-9.74, 6.82]; P = 0.73).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Down syndrome did not require more sedation or analgesia in the first three days after surgery than patients without Down syndrome. Additionally, the two groups showed no significant difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation.