direct costs

直接费用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言中耳炎(OM)的患病率在全世界是相当大的。与全球OM经济负担相关的流行病学数据很少。进行了本系统综述,以估计该疾病在世界各地的经济负担。目标使用PRISMA指南进行了广泛的文献检索,以确定以货币形式估计OM经济负担的相关研究。搜索的数据库是PubMedCentral,奥维德,和Embase。对一个特定年份进行成本估算,然后考虑通货膨胀率进行比较。数据综合文献检索导致纳入10项研究。这些研究以货币形式评估了直接和间接成本。每集OM的直接费用(卫生系统和患者观点)从122.64美元(美元)(荷兰)到633.6美元(美国)不等。只从病人的角度来看,费用从19.32美元(阿曼)到80.5美元(沙特阿拉伯)不等。每集OM的总成本(直接和间接)从232.7美元到977美元(英国)不等。美国每年的经济负担最高(50亿美元)。在5岁以下的儿童中,OM发作的发生率更高。肺炎球菌结合疫苗的引入降低了儿童的发病率,现在成人的患病率令人担忧。结论OM的经济负担在全球范围内相对较高,解决这一公共卫生负担很重要。预防方法,诊断,卫生系统应进行治疗,以减轻这种疾病负担。
    Introduction  The prevalence of otitis media (OM) is substantial all over the world. Epidemiological data related to the economic burden of OM globally is minimal. The present systematic review was undertaken to estimate the economic burden of this disease in various parts of the world. Objectives  An extensive literature search was done using PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant studies that estimated the economic burden of OM in monetary terms. The databases searched were PubMed Central, Ovid, and Embase. The cost estimation was done for one specific year and then compared considering the inflation rate. Data Synthesis  The literature search led to the inclusion of 10 studies. The studies evaluated direct and indirect costs in monetary terms. Direct costs (health system and patient perspective) ranged from USD (United States Dollar) 122.64 (Netherlands) to USD 633.6 (USA) per episode of OM. Looking at only the patient perspective, the costs ranged from USD 19.32 (Oman) to USD 80.5 (Saudi Arabia). The total costs (direct and indirect) ranged from USD 232.7 to USD 977 (UK) per episode of OM. The economic burden per year was highest in the USA (USD 5 billion). The incidence of OM episodes was found more in children < 5 years old. Introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines decreased the incidence in children and now the prevalence in adults is of concern. Conclusion  The economic burden of OM is relatively high globally and addressing this public health burden is important. Approaches for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment should be undertaken by the health system to alleviate this disease burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:结节性痒疹(PN)是一种皮肤疾病,其特征是皮肤结节严重发痒,与重要的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)有关。这项研究旨在评估英格兰PN总体和中度至重度PN(MSPN)患者的HCRU。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究使用了来自英国临床实践研究数据链和医院事件统计的数据。在主要分析中,将轻度PN(MiPN)患者与MSPN患者的年龄和性别进行匹配。患者在2007年4月1日至2019年3月1日期间纳入研究。计算了全因HCCU,包括初级和二级保健接触者和费用(成本年2022)。
    结果:在23,522名确定的患者中,8,933符合纳入标准,与2,479名PN患者的主要匹配队列。随访期间,MSPN组和MiPN组的匹配队列初级护理访视次数分别为21.27/患者年(PPY)和11.35PPY.MSPN和MiPN组的任何门诊量为10.72PPY和4.87PPY,分别。MSPN和MiPN组的门诊皮肤科访视为1.96PPY和1.14PPY,分别。
    结论:PN,尤其是MSPN,在英国有很高的HCCU负担,强调需要新的和改进的疾病管理治疗。
    Purpose: Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a skin disease characterized by intensely itchy skin nodules and is associated with a significant healthcare resource utilization (HCRU). This study aimed to estimate the HCRU of patients in England with PN overall and moderate-to-severe PN (MSPN) in particular.
    Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics in England. Patients with Mild PN (MiPN) were matched to patients with MSPN by age and gender for the primary analysis. Patients were enrolled in the study between 1st April 2007 and 1st March 2019. All-cause HCRU was calculated, including primary and secondary care contacts and costs (cost-year 2022).
    Results: Of 23,522 identified patients, 8,933 met the inclusion criteria, with a primary matched cohort of 2,479 PN patients. During follow up, the matched cohort\'s primary care visits were 21.27 per patient year (PPY) for MSPN group and 11.35 PPY for MiPN group. Any outpatient visits were 10.72 PPY and 4.87 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively. Outpatient dermatology visits were 1.96 PPY and 1.14 PPY in MSPN and MiPN groups, respectively.
    Conclusion: PN, especially MSPN, has a high HCRU burden in England, highlighting the need for new and improved disease management treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:量化30-69岁吸烟者与吸烟相关的经济负担,以及约旦15-69岁的二手吸烟者(SHS)。材料和方法:根据世界卫生组织开发的烟草经济学工具包进行了基于患病率的分析。分析的时间范围为一年(2019年)。直接和间接成本是使用2019年全球疾病负担研究的数据估算的。该分析针对约旦30-69岁的吸烟者,和SHS年龄15-69岁。调整适用于年龄,性别,与吸烟有关的疾病。直接成本是使用吸烟归因分数(SAF)和国家卫生支出估算的。间接成本分为发病率和死亡率部分。在对未来的经济损失进行建模时,假定折现率为3.0%,年生产率增长率为1.0%。对这项研究中使用的数据的下限和上限进行了敏感性分析。结果:吸烟和SHS暴露的成本估计为21.08亿美元(95%置信区间[CI]=20.03亿美元-22.45亿美元)。这占国内生产总值(GDP)的4.7%(95CI=4.5%-5.0%)。直接成本占全国GDP的3.1%。吸烟占总成本的85.0%,SHS暴露占总成本的15.0%。直接成本占总成本的67.0%,而间接发病率和死亡率费用占总费用的9.0%和24.0%,分别。非传染性疾病占总直接费用的96.0%,而传染性疾病占总直接费用的4.0%。结论:戒烟干预措施,如提高卷烟税,保护人们免受烟草烟雾的侵害,警告标签,普通包装,并禁止广告,对于控制国家治疗吸烟相关疾病的支出和避免未来的经济损失至关重要。
    在这项工作中,我们的目标是计算2019年约旦吸烟的年度经济影响。我们使用世界卫生组织的工具包方法来估计全国范围内与吸烟相关的直接和间接成本。我们的重点是30-69岁的约旦吸烟者和15-69岁的二手烟暴露者。直接费用是使用流行病学数据计算的,该数据涉及可归因于吸烟的卫生支出比例和国家卫生支出。间接成本分为两部分:发病率和死亡率。我们还预测了未来的经济损失,假设3.0%的贴现率和1.0%的生产率年增长率。我们的研究估计,吸烟和接触二手烟的成本为21.08亿美元(20.03亿美元-22.45亿美元),占约旦国内生产总值的4.7%(4.5%-5.0%)。大部分费用(85.0%)是由于直接吸烟,而15.0%是由于暴露于二手烟。直接成本占总成本的67.0%,而与发病率和死亡率相关的费用占总费用的9.0%和24.0%,分别。总之,我们的研究强调吸烟对约旦有显著的经济影响.因此,实施有效的戒烟计划至关重要,例如执行现有的反烟草政策和提高税收。这些措施可以帮助控制国家治疗吸烟相关疾病的支出,防止未来的经济损失。
    UNASSIGNED: To quantify the economic burden associated with tobacco smoking among smokers aged 30-69 years, and second-hand smokers (SHS) aged 15-69 years in Jordan.
    UNASSIGNED: A prevalence-based analysis was conducted in alignment with the Economics of Tobacco Toolkit developed by the WHO. The time-horizon of the analysis was one year (2019). Direct and indirect costs were estimated using data from the 2019 Global Burden of Diseases study. The analysis targeted the Jordanian population of smokers aged 30-69 years, and SHS aged 15-69 years. Adjustments were applied for age, gender, and smoking-related diseases. Direct costs were estimated using the smoking-attributable fraction (SAF) and national health expenditures. Indirect costs were divided into morbidity and mortality components. A discount rate of 3.0% and an annual productivity growth rate of 1.0% were assumed in modelling future economic losses. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on the lower and upper estimates of data used in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: The cost of tobacco smoking and SHS exposure was estimated at US$2,108 million (95% confidence interval [CI] = US$2,003 million-US$2,245 million). This represents 4.7% (95%CI = 4.5%-5.0%) of national gross domestic product (GDP). Direct costs accounted for 3.1% of national GDP. Tobacco smoking accounted for 85.0% of total cost and SHS exposure accounted for 15.0% of total cost. Direct costs accounted for 67.0% of total cost, while indirect morbidity and mortality costs accounted for 9.0% and 24.0% of total cost, respectively. Non-communicable diseases accounted for 96.0% of total direct costs compared to communicable diseases (4.0% of total direct costs).
    UNASSIGNED: Smoking cessation interventions such as raising taxes on cigarettes, protecting people from tobacco smoke, warning labels, plain packaging, and bans on advertising, are crucial for controlling national expenditures for treating smoking-related diseases and for averting future economic losses.
    In this work, we aimed to calculate the annual economic impact of tobacco smoking in Jordan in 2019. We used the World Health Organization toolkit methodology to estimate both the direct and indirect costs associated with smoking nationally. Our focus was on Jordanian smokers aged 30-69 years and people exposed to second-hand smoke aged 15–69 years. Direct costs were calculated using epidemiological data on the proportion of health expenditures attributable to smoking and the national health expenditures. Indirect costs were divided into two components: morbidity and mortality. We also projected future economic losses, assuming a 3.0% discount rate and a 1.0% annual growth rate of productivity. Our study estimated that the cost of smoking and exposure to second-hand smoke was US$2,108 million (US$2,003 million-US$2,245 million), which accounted for 4.7% (4.5%-5.0) of Jordan’s gross domestic product. The majority of the cost (85.0%) was due to direct smoking, while 15.0% was due to exposure to second-hand smoke. Direct costs made up 67.0% of the total cost, while the costs related to morbidity and mortality accounted for 9.0% and 24.0% of the total cost, respectively. In conclusion, our study emphasized that tobacco smoking has a significant economic impact on Jordan. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective smoking cessation programs, such as enforcing existing anti-tobacco policies and raising taxes. These measures can help control national expenditures for treating smoking-related diseases and prevent future economic losses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述美国偏头痛患者开始治疗急性和预防性治疗药物标准后3年的治疗模式和直接医疗费用。
    背景:关于长期(>1年)偏头痛治疗模式和相关结局的数据有限。
    方法:这是一个回顾性研究,使用IBM®MarketScan®研究数据库(2010年1月至2017年12月)的美国索赔数据进行的观察性队列研究.如果成年人在指数期(2011年1月至2014年12月)有急性偏头痛治疗(AMT)或预防性偏头痛治疗(PMT)的处方要求,则包括在内。AMT队列被归类为持久性,骑自行车,或附加亚组;PMT队列被归类为PMT-持久性,无间隙切换,或与间隙循环。AMT和PMT队列亚组的偏头痛特异性年度直接费用(2017美元)在基线至3年(随访)进行了总结。
    结果:在索引期间,20,778和42,259名患者开始了AMT和PMT,分别。在3年的随访中,在两个AMT中,相对于非持续性亚组,持续性亚组的偏头痛特异性直接成本较低(平均值[SD]:$789[$1741]vs.附加子组中为$2847[$8149],循环子组中为$862[$5426])和PMT队列(持久性子组中的平均值[SD]:$1817[$5892]与无间隙子组中的$4257[$11,392]和带间隙子组中的$3269[$18,540])。急性药物过度使用在持续性亚组(1025/6504[27.2%])和非持久性亚组(11,236/58,863[32.2%]在有间隙的循环亚组和1431/6504[39.4%]在无间隙的切换亚组)。大多数患者在治疗开始后3年内使用多种急性(19,717/20,778[94.9%])或预防性(38,494/42,259[91.1%])药物治疗。预防性治疗的差距很常见;平均差距为85至211天(〜3-7个月)。
    结论:在AMT和PMT持续治疗的患者中,偏头痛特异性年度医疗费用和急性偏头痛药物过度使用仍然最低。研究结果仅限于美国人口。未来的研究应该比较偏头痛患者的新型预防性偏头痛药物的成本和相关结果。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States.
    BACKGROUND: There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM® MarketScan® Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up).
    RESULTS: During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这个观察的目的,单中心,在西班牙一家三级医院进行的回顾性研究旨在描述接受化疗(CT)或免疫疗法(IT)作为一线和二线治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者的真实世界(RW)医疗资源利用情况.共纳入了173例诊断为aNSCLC并在2016年1月至2020年8月期间接受治疗的患者。一线CT和IT每位患者/年的标准化平均费用分别为40,973.2欧元和22,502.4欧元,二线CT和IT分别为140,601.3欧元和20,175.9欧元,分别。与不良事件(AE)发作相关的每位患者的平均年度费用为:一线CT和IT为29,939.7欧元和460.7欧元,二线CT和IT为35,906.4欧元和3206.1欧元。分别。与疾病管理相关的费用为一线CT和IT的33,178.0欧元和22,448.4欧元,二线CT和IT的127,134.2欧元和19,663.9欧元。分别。总之,IT使用显示每位患者的平均年成本较低,这与疾病和AE管理的HCCU水平较低有关,与使用CT相比。然而,这些结果应在目前实施的治疗方案中得到进一步证实,包括CT与单或双IT的组合。
    The objective of this observational, single-center, retrospective study conducted in a Spanish tertiary hospital was to describe the real-world (RW) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) who received chemotherapy (CT) or immunotherapy (IT) as first and second lines of treatment. A total of 173 patients diagnosed with aNSCLC and treated between January 2016 and August 2020 were included. The standardized average costs per patient/year were EUR 40,973.2 and EUR 22,502.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 140,601.3 and EUR 20,175.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The average annual costs per patient associated with adverse-event (AE) onset were EUR 29,939.7 and EUR 460.7 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 35,906.4 and EUR 3206.1 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. The costs associated with disease management were EUR 33,178.0 and EUR 22,448.4 for first-line CT and IT and EUR 127,134.2 and EUR 19,663.9 for second-line CT and IT, respectively. In conclusion, IT use showed a lower average annual cost per patient, which was associated with lower HCRU for both disease and AE management, compared to the use of CT. However, these results should be further confirmed in the context of the currently implemented treatment schemes, including the combination of CT with single or dual IT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    达芬奇的机器人手术彻底改变了几种疾病的治疗方法,包括前列腺癌;尽管如此,成本仍然是主要的缺点。最近,新的机器人平台进入市场,旨在降低成本并改善机器人手术的获取。该研究的目的是比较使用两种不同的机器人系统进行根治性前列腺切除术的初始住院时间的直接费用。达芬奇和新的雨果RAS系统。这是一项应用机器人手术成本的预测研究,源自当地招标,达芬奇和雨果RAS进行机器人根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)的临床过程。这项研究是在配备两种系统的公共机器人手术转诊中心进行的。考虑了当地招标的机器人手术费用,其中包括租金,年度维护,和每个程序的费用,包括四个机器人仪器的设置。这些费用适用于自2022年11月以来接受两种系统RALP的患者。主要终点是评估达芬奇和雨果RAS的初始住院直接费用,通过考虑设备成本(从投标中得出),以及剧院和住院费用。达芬奇手术的直接每道程序费用为2,246.31欧元,雨果RALP为1995欧元。在本地设置中,HugoRAS为RALP节省了11%的成本。通过将每个程序的成本应用于我们的临床数据,达芬奇的整个指数住院支出为6.7555,1欧元,雨果RALP为6.637,15欧元。新的HugoRAS系统愿意减少RALP机器人手术的直接支出;此外,与达芬奇相比,它提供了相似的围手术期结局.然而,应考虑其他成本驱动因素,例如或使用的持续时间-这不仅仅是控制台时间,可能取决于设施的背景和组织。机器人系统的直接成本的进一步变化与案件量有关,地方协议和谈判。因此,新机器人平台的成本比较仍然是一个持续存在的问题。
    Robotic surgery with Da Vinci has revolutionized the treatment of several diseases, including prostate cancer; nevertheless, costs remain the major drawback. Recently, new robotic platforms entered the market aiming to reduce costs and improve the access to robotic surgery. The aim of the study is to compare direct cost for initial hospital stay of radical prostatectomy performed with two different robotic systems, the Da Vinci and the new Hugo RAS system. This is a projection study that applies cost of robotic surgery, derived from a local tender, to the clinical course of robotic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed with Da Vinci and Hugo RAS. The study was performed in a public referral center for robotic surgery equipped with both systems. The cost of robotic surgery from a local tender were considered and included rent, annual maintenance, and a per-procedure fee covering the setup of four robotic instruments. Those costs were applied to patients who underwent RALP with both systems since November 2022. The primary endpoint is to evaluate direct costs of initial hospital stay for Da Vinci and Hugo RAS, by considering equipment costs (as derived from the tender), and costs of theater and of hospitalization. The direct per-procedure cost is €2,246.31 for a Da Vinci procedure and €1995 for a Hugo RALP. In the local setting, Hugo RAS provides 11% of cost saving for RALP. By applying this per-procedure cost to our clinical data, the expenditure for the entire index hospitalization is € 6.7755,1 for Da Vinci and € 6.637,15 for Hugo RALP. The new Hugo RAS system is willing to reduce direct expenditures of robotic surgery for RALP; furthermore, it provides similar peri-operative outcomes compared to the Da Vinci. However, other drivers of costs should be taken into account, such as the duration of OR use-that is more than just console time and may depend on the facility\'s background and organization. Further variations in direct costs of robotic systems are related to caseload, local agreements and negotiations. Thus, cost comparison of new robotic platform still remains an ongoing issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:根据潜在的病因和癫痫类型,癫痫患者的疾病负担可能有很大差异。本分析旨在比较与癫痫相关的结节性硬化症(TSC)成人的直接和间接成本和生活质量(QoL)。特发性全身性癫痫(IGE),和德国的局灶性癫痫(FE)。
    方法:对92例TSC合并癫痫患者的问卷进行年龄和性别匹配,在独立研究中收集的92例IGE患者和92例FE患者的反应。对主要QoL成分进行了比较,直接费用(患者就诊,药物使用,医疗设备,诊断程序,辅助治疗,和运输成本),间接成本(就业,减少工作时间,错过的日子),和护理水平成本。
    结果:在所有三个队列中,平均直接总成本(TSC:7602欧元[中位数2620欧元];IGE:1919欧元[中位数446欧元],P<0.001;FE:2598欧元[中位数892欧元],P<0.001)和3个月内生产率损失导致的平均间接总成本(TSC:7185欧元[中位数11,925欧元];IGE:3599欧元[中位数0欧元],P<0.001;FE:5082欧元[中位数2981欧元],P=0.03)在TSC患者中最高。失业的TSC患者的比例(60%)明显大于IGE患者的比例(23%,P<0.001)或FE(34%,P=P<0.001)失业人员。5个维度和3个级别的EuroQuol量表的指数得分TSC患者(时间权衡[TTO]:0.705,视觉模拟量表[VAS]:0.577)明显低于IGE患者(TTO:0.897,VAS:0.813;P<0.001)或FE(TTO:0.879,VAS:0.769;P<0.001)。TSC患者修订后的癫痫病耻感量表评分(3.97)也显著高于IGE患者(1.48,P<0.001)或FE患者(2.45,P<0.001)。TSC(57.7)和FE(57.6)患者的癫痫总体生活质量量表-31项评分明显低于IGE患者(66.6,P=0.004)。在癫痫的神经障碍抑郁量表(TSC:13.1;IGE:11.2,P=0.009)和利物浦不良事件概况评分(TSC:42.7;IGE:37.5,P=0.017)中,TSC和IGE患者之间也存在显着差异,在两个问卷中,TSC患者的得分更高,结果更差。
    结论:这项研究是第一个比较TSC患者,IGE,和德国的FE,并强调了TSC患者过重的QoL负担以及直接和间接成本负担。
    BACKGROUND: Depending on the underlying etiology and epilepsy type, the burden of disease for patients with seizures can vary significantly. This analysis aimed to compare direct and indirect costs and quality of life (QoL) among adults with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) related with epilepsy, idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), and focal epilepsy (FE) in Germany.
    METHODS: Questionnaire responses from 92 patients with TSC and epilepsy were matched by age and gender, with responses from 92 patients with IGE and 92 patients with FE collected in independent studies. Comparisons were made across the main QoL components, direct costs (patient visits, medication usage, medical equipment, diagnostic procedures, ancillary treatments, and transport costs), indirect costs (employment, reduced working hours, missed days), and care level costs.
    RESULTS: Across all three cohorts, mean total direct costs (TSC: €7602 [median €2620]; IGE: €1919 [median €446], P < 0.001; FE: €2598 [median €892], P < 0.001) and mean total indirect costs due to lost productivity over 3 months (TSC: €7185 [median €11,925]; IGE: €3599 [median €0], P < 0.001; FE: €5082 [median €2981], P = 0.03) were highest among patients with TSC. The proportion of patients with TSC who were unemployed (60%) was significantly larger than the proportions of patients with IGE (23%, P < 0.001) or FE (34%, P = P < 0.001) who were unemployed. Index scores for the EuroQuol Scale with 5 dimensions and 3 levels were significantly lower for patients with TSC (time-trade-off [TTO]: 0.705, visual analog scale [VAS]: 0.577) than for patients with IGE (TTO: 0.897, VAS: 0.813; P < 0.001) or FE (TTO: 0.879, VAS: 0.769; P < 0.001). Revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale scores were also significantly higher for patients with TSC (3.97) than for patients with IGE (1.48, P < 0.001) or FE (2.45, P < 0.001). Overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 items scores was significantly lower among patients with TSC (57.7) and FE (57.6) than among patients with IGE (66.6, P = 0.004 in both comparisons). Significant differences between patients with TSC and IGE were also determined for Neurological Disorder Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (TSC: 13.1; IGE: 11.2, P = 0.009) and Liverpool Adverse Events Profile scores (TSC: 42.7; IGE: 37.5, P = 0.017) with higher score and worse results for TSC patients in both questionnaires.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to compare patients with TSC, IGE, and FE in Germany and underlines the excessive QoL burden and both direct and indirect cost burdens experienced by patients with TSC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)在中国影响数百万人,并且对经历恶化的住院患者施加相当大的经济负担。雾化吸入短效β-2激动剂(SABA)被推荐作为急性加重患者的初始治疗,但最优SABA仍不确定。本研究旨在评估不同SABA的影响,如沙丁胺醇和左沙丁胺醇,诊断为COPD的住院患者的住院时间(LOS)和直接医疗费用。方法本回顾性队列研究使用来自重庆市三家医院的关联医院管理数据。COPD患者,40岁及以上,在住院期间连续接受沙丁胺醇或左伐特罗雾化治疗的患者,有资格参加这项研究。患者按性别1:1匹配,年龄,和严重程度根据全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)1-4级。根据他们接受的不同SABA治疗对患者进行分组。人口统计,经济,并检索临床资料。评估了LOS和直接医疗费用。结果共纳入158例COPD患者,各治疗组79。用利伐特罗治疗的患者中位LOS明显较短(7.0天与8.0天,P=0.003)和更少的直接医疗保健中位数成本(总成本:8,868.3日元与¥10,290.7,P=0.014;COPD相关西药费用:¥383.8vs.¥505.3)。60岁或以上的患者更有可能经历更长的LOS和更高的直接成本。结论本回顾性队列分析支持沙丁胺醇与左旋沙丁胺醇相比具有更长的LOS和更高的成本。
    Introduction Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions in China and imposes a considerable economic burden on hospitalized patients who experience exacerbations. Nebulized short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA) are recommended as initial therapy for exacerbation patients, but the optimal SABA remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different SABAs, such as albuterol and levalbuterol, on the length of stay (LOS) and direct medical costs among hospitalized patients diagnosed with COPD. Methods This retrospective cohort study uses linked hospital administrative data from three hospitals in Chongqing. Patients with COPD, aged 40 years and older, who had been continuously treated with nebulized albuterol or levalbuterol during hospitalization, were eligible for the study. Patients were matched 1:1 by sex, age, and severity according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 1-4. Patients were grouped according to the different SABA treatments they received. Demographic, economic, and clinical data were retrieved. LOS and direct healthcare costs were assessed. Results A total of 158 COPD patients were included, with 79 in each treatment group. Patients treated with levalbuterol had a significantly shorter median LOS (7.0 days vs. 8.0 days, P=0.003) and fewer direct healthcare median costs (total cost: ¥8,868.3 vs. ¥10,290.7, P=0.014; COPD-related western medicine fees: ¥383.8 vs. ¥505.3). Patients aged 60 or older were more likely to experience longer LOS and higher direct costs. Conclusion This retrospective cohort analysis supports that albuterol was associated with longer LOS and higher costs than levalbuterol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在确定在意大利两个医疗保健地区接受治疗的糖尿病患者的直接医疗保健费用的分布,根据合并症的数量和治疗方案。
    方法:这是一项回顾性分析,使用了2014-2018年意大利两个地方卫生当局行政数据库(坎帕尼亚和翁布里亚)的数据。医院护理数据,收集了药物和专科门诊和实验室援助。2014-2018年的所有糖尿病患者都是根据至少一种降糖药(ATCA10)处方确定的,主要或次要诊断为糖尿病的住院治疗(ICD9CM250。xx)或糖尿病豁免代码(代码013)。根据一年中的药物处方将受试者分为三组:1型/2型糖尿病(T1D/T2D),每天多次注射胰岛素(MDI),仅使用基础胰岛素的2型糖尿病(T2D-Basal)和不使用胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病(T2D-Oral)。
    结果:在获得数据期间,我们确定了304,779名糖尿病患者。对288,097名接受降糖药物治疗的受试者进行了分析(13%T1D/T2D-MDI,13%T2D-基础,74%T2D-口服)。T1D/T2D-MDI患者和T2D-Basal患者2018年的平均年费用相似(分别为2580欧元和2254欧元),T2D-Oral患者的平均年费用显着降低(1145欧元)。住院费用是主要驱动因素(T1D/T2D-MDI占47%,T2D-Basal的45%,T2D-口服占45%),其次是药物/器械(35%,39%,43%)和门诊服务(18%,16%,12%)。随着合并症的增加,平均费用大大增加:从糖尿病患者的459欧元增加到患有四种合并症的患者的7464欧元。在所有亚组分析中发现了类似的趋势。
    结论:糖尿病患者的年治疗费用与仅接受MDI或基础胰岛素治疗的患者相似。住院是主要的费用驱动因素。这表明,两组患者都应受益于扫描连续血糖监测(CGM)技术,该技术已知与急性糖尿病事件的住院率显着减少有关。与自我监测血糖(SMBG)测试相比。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to define the distribution of direct healthcare costs for people with diabetes treated in two healthcare regions in Italy, based on number of comorbidities and treatment regimen.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis using data from two local health authority administrative databases (Campania and Umbria) in Italy for the years 2014-2018. Data on hospital care, pharmaceutical and specialist outpatient and laboratory assistance were collected. All people with diabetes in 2014-2018 were identified on the basis of at least one prescription of hypoglycemic drugs (ATC A10), hospitalization with primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (ICD9CM 250.xx) or diabetes exemption code (code 013). Subjects were stratified into three groups according to their pharmaceutical prescriptions during the year: Type 1/type 2 diabetes (T1D/T2D) treated with multiple daily injections with insulin (MDI), type 2 diabetes on basal insulin only (T2D-Basal) and type 2 diabetes not on insulin therapy (T2D-Oral).
    RESULTS: We identified 304,779 people with diabetes during the period for which data was obtained. Analysis was undertaken on 288,097 subjects treated with glucose-lowering drugs (13% T1D/T2D-MDI, 13% T2D-Basal, 74% T2D-Oral). Average annual cost per patient for the year 2018 across the total cohort was similar for people with T1D/T2D-MDI and people with T2D-Basal (respectively €2580 and €2254) and significantly lower for T2D-Oral (€1145). Cost of hospitalization was the main driver (47% for T1D/T2D-MDI, 45% for T2D-Basal, 45% for T2D-Oral) followed by drugs/devices (35%, 39%, 43%) and outpatient services (18%, 16%, 12%). Average costs increased considerably with increasing comorbidities: from €459 with diabetes only to €7464 for a patient with four comorbidities. Similar trends were found across all subgroups analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Annual cost of treatment for people with diabetes is similar for those treated with MDI or with basal insulin only, with hospitalization being the main cost driver. This indicates that both patient groups should benefit from having access to scanning continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology which is known to be associated with significantly reduced hospitalization for acute diabetes events, compared to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:门诊护理敏感疾病(ACSC)的住院会给卫生系统带来巨大的成本,而通过适当的门诊护理可以部分避免。慢性疾病的并发症,如糖尿病(DM),被认为是ACSC。先前的研究表明,由于糖尿病而住院具有重大的经济负担。在墨西哥,DM是一个主要的健康问题和死亡的主要原因,但证据有限.这项研究旨在估计墨西哥公共卫生系统中与DM相关的ACSC住院的直接费用。
    方法:我们从墨西哥的主要公共机构中选择了三家医院:墨西哥社会保障研究所(IMSS),卫生部(MoH),和国家工人社会保障和服务研究所(ISSSTE)。我们从医疗保健提供者的角度采用了自下而上的微观成本方法来估算与DM相关的ACSC的住院总直接成本。有关停留时间(LoS)的输入数据,协商,药物,胶体/晶体溶液,程序,和实验室/医学成像研究来自2016年期间,在总共1,803例DM相关ACSC(ICD-10编码)出院中,有532例住院治疗的随机样本的临床记录.
    结果:每个与DM相关的ACSC住院的平均费用因机构而异,从卫生部的1,427美元到IMSS的1,677美元和ISSSTE的1,754美元不等。三大机构最大的支出是LoS和程序。外周循环和肾脏并发症是DM相关ACSC患者住院费用的主要驱动因素。在这三个机构中,与DM相关的ACSC住院的直接费用占用于健康和社会服务的国内生产总值(GDP)的1%,占医院护理总费用的2%。
    结论:与DM相关的ACSC住院的直接费用在各个机构之间差异很大。不同机构之间相同ACSC的此类成本差异表明,基层和医院环境(流程和资源利用)之间的护理质量存在潜在差异,应进一步调查,以确保最佳的供应利用率。糖尿病患者外周循环和肾脏并发症的预防措施可能非常有益。
    BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) incur substantial costs on the health system that could be partially avoided with adequate outpatient care. Complications of chronic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus (DM), are considered ACSC. Previous studies have shown that hospitalizations due to diabetes have a significant financial burden. In Mexico, DM is a major health concern and a leading cause of death, but there is limited evidence available. This study aimed to estimate the direct costs of hospitalizations by DM-related ACSC in the Mexican public health system.
    METHODS: We selected three hospitals from each of Mexico\'s main public institutions: the Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS), the Ministry of Health (MoH), and the Institute of Social Security and Services for State Workers (ISSSTE). We employed a bottom-up microcosting approach from the healthcare provider perspective to estimate the total direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC. Input data regarding length of stay (LoS), consultations, medications, colloid/crystalloid solutions, procedures, and laboratory/medical imaging studies were obtained from clinical records of a random sample of 532 hospitalizations out of a total of 1,803 DM-related ACSC (ICD-10 codes) discharges during 2016.
    RESULTS: The average cost per DM-related ACSC hospitalization varies among institutions, ranging from $1,427 in the MoH to $1,677 in the IMSS and $1,754 in the ISSSTE. The three institutions\' largest expenses are LoS and procedures. Peripheral circulatory and renal complications were the major drivers of hospitalization costs for patients with DM-related ACSC. Direct costs due to hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC in these three institutions represent 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) dedicated to health and social services and 2% of total hospital care expenses.
    CONCLUSIONS: The direct costs of hospitalizations for DM-related ACSC vary considerably across institutions. Disparities in such costs for the same ACSC among different institutions suggest potential disparities in care quality across primary and hospital settings (processes and resource utilization), which should be further investigated to ensure optimal supply utilization. Prioritizing preventive measures for peripheral circulatory and renal complications in DM patients could be highly beneficial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号