The use of sedatives in Intensive Care Units (ICU) is essential for relieving anxiety and stress in mechanically ventilated patients, and it is related to clinical outcomes, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the ICU. Inhaled sedatives offer benefits such as faster awakening and extubation, decreased total opioid and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMB) doses, as well as bronchodilator, anticonvulsant, and cardiopulmonary and neurological protective effects. Inhaled sedation is administered using a specific vaporizer. Isoflurane is the recommended agent due to its efficacy and safety profile. Inhaled sedation is recommended for moderate and deep sedation, prolonged sedation, difficult sedation, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), status asthmaticus, and super-refractory status epilepticus. By offering these significant advantages, the use of inhaled sedatives allows for a personalized and controlled approach to optimize sedation in the ICU.

BACKGROUND: The increase in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) incidence is a worldwide phenomenon, resulting in a heavy disease burden in the public health systems, specifically in emerging countries. The shock index (SI) is a physiological parameter that indicates cardiovascular status and has been used as a tool to assess the presence and severity of shock, which is increased in sTBI. Considering the high mortality of sTBI, scrutinizing the predictive potential of SI and its variants is vital.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the predictive potential of SI and its variants in sTBI.
METHODS: This study included 71 patients (61 men and 10 women) divided into two groups: Survival (S; n = 49) and Non-survival (NS; n = 22). The responses of blood pressure and heart rate (HR) were collected at admission and 48 h after admission. The SI, reverse SI (rSI), rSI multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Score (rSIG), and Age multiplied SI (AgeSI) were calculated. Group comparisons included Shapiro-Wilk tests, and independent samples t-tests. For predictive analysis, logistic regression, receiver operator curves (ROC) curves, and area under the curve (AUC) measurements were performed.
RESULTS: No significant differences between groups were identified for SI, rSI, or rSIG. The AgeSI was significantly higher in NS patients at 48 h following admission (S: 26.32 ± 14.2, and NS: 37.27 ± 17.8; P = 0.016). Both the logistic regression and the AUC following ROC curve analysis showed that only AgeSI at 48 h was capable of predicting sTBI outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Although an altered balance between HR and blood pressure can provide insights into the adequacy of oxygen delivery to tissues and the overall cardiac function, only the AgeSI was a viable outcome-predictive tool in sTBI, warranting future research in different cohorts.

UNASSIGNED: We analysed the neurological complications of patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive study of consecutive patients admitted to the ICU due to severe respiratory symptoms secondary to SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 April and 1 June 2020.
UNASSIGNED: We included 30 patients with neurological symptoms; 21 were men (72.40%), and mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 57.41 years (11.61). The mean duration of ICU stay was 18.83 days (14.33). The neurological conditions recorded were acute confusional syndrome in 28 patients (93.33%), neuromuscular disease in 15 (50%), headache in 5 (16.66%), cerebrovascular disease in 4 (13.33%), and encephalopathies/encephalitis in 4 (13.33%). CSF analysis results were normal in 6 patients (20%). Brain MRI or head CT showed alterations in 20 patients (66.6%). EEG was performed in all patients (100%), with 8 (26.66%) showing abnormal findings. In 5 of the 15 patients with clinical myopathy, diagnosis was confirmed with electroneuromyography. We found a correlation between older age and duration of ICU stay (P = .002; 95% CI: 4.032-6.022; OR: 3,594).
UNASSIGNED: Severe COVID-19 mainly affects men, as observed in other series. Half of our patients presented acute myopathy, and almost all patients left the ICU with acute confusional syndrome, which fully resolved; no correlation was found with EEG or neuroimaging findings. Older age is associated with longer ICU stay.

When the studies are evaluated, immunomodulatory effect of MSCs, administration in critically ill patients, obstacle situations in use and side effects, pulmonary fibrosis prevention, which stem cells and their products, regeneration effect, administration route, and dosage are listed under the main heading like. The effect of MSC administration on DNA repair genes in COVID-19 infection is unknown. Our aim is to determine the effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy applied in critically ill patients with coronavirus infection on DNA repair pathways and genes associated with those pathways. Patients (n = 30) divided into two equal groups. Group-1: Patients in a critically ill condition, Group-2: Patients in critically ill condition and transplanted MSCs. The mechanism was investigated in eleven genes of five different pathways; Base excision repair: PARP1, Nucleotide excision repair (NER): RAD23B and ERCC1, Homologous recombinational repair (HR): ATM, RAD51, RAD52 and WRN, Mismatch repair (MMR): MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6, Direct reversal repair pathway: MGMT. It was found that MSCs application had a significant effect on 6 genes located in 3 different DNA damage response pathways. These are NER pathway genes; RAD23 and ERCC1, HR pathway genes; ATM and RAD51, MMR pathway genes; MSH2 and MSH6 (p < 0.05). Two main points were shown. First, as a result of cellular damage in critical patients with COVID-19, DNA damage occurs and then DNA repair pathways and genes are activated in reaction to this situation. Second, administration of MSC to patients with COVID-19 infection plays a positive role by increasing the expression of DNA repair genes located in DNA damage pathways.

Among critical patients, there is an early onset of changes in both the quantity and quality of muscle mass. It is essential to find tools that promptly identify this muscle mass loss. The aim of this study was to compare the ultrasonography of the quadriceps femoris to the gold standard, thigh computed tomography (CT) for assessing the musculature of critically ill patients with different body mass index who have suffered traumatic brain injury.
This is a prospective validation study in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) specialized in trauma care, located at a tertiary teaching hospital. Our study involved a convenience sample of patients. Sequential ultrasound and CT scans were performed at three distinct time intervals: upon admission, between 24 and 96 h\' post-admission, and finally, between 96 and 168 h\' post-admission. For all ultrasound measurements, we conducted simultaneous quadriceps CT measurements. The correlation between measurements obtained by ultrasound and computed tomography at three different times and in three BMI ranges was analyzed, in individuals with normal weight, overweight and obese.
Results: We analyzed 252 images in 49 patients in time 1, 40 patients in time 2, and 37 in time 3 to compare the thickness quadriceps muscle using US and CT. Of these, 18 patients had a BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2 (normal weight), 18 patients from 25 to 29.9 kg/m2 (overweight), and 8 patients had a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (obese). The mean age was 37 years, the majority (94%) were male and the main comorbidities were: hypertension 12%, diabetes 4% and 14% smoking. The results revealed minor discrepancies between measurements obtained through the two methods, these changes were not influenced by the body mass index, with these variations being practically insignificant in the context of clinical application. Thus, the correlation and concordance between the values obtained found a strong positive correlation with good limits of agreement. The Spearman\'s correlation coefficients obtained were r = 0.89, 0.91 and 0.88, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for normal weight, r = 0.91, 0.80 and 0.81, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for overweight and r = 0.89, 0.94 and 0.84, p < 0.01 at T1, T2 and T3 respectively for obesity. In addition to a positive correlation, we observed a high agreement between the methods. The Bland & Altman analysis at time 1 showed, respectively, the bias of 1.46, 2.03 and 0.76. At time 2, the bias was 0.42, 3.11 and 2.12. At time 3, the bias was 2.26, 3.38 and 2.11 mm.
Our findings suggest that measure femoral quadriceps muscle thickness ultrasound-based exhibits a comparable performance to thigh CT. This conclusion stems from the excellent correlation and good agreement observed between ultrasound and CT, which is considered the gold standard for muscle assessment in critically ill patients.
This clinical trial is registered at REBEC https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/ identifier: RBR-2bzspnz. The protocol was approved, on July 30, 2019, by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto - Trial Registration Number: 3,475,851.

The optimal access route in patients with severe peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains undetermined.
This study sought to compare clinical outcomes with transfemoral access (TFA), transthoracic access (TTA), and nonthoracic transalternative access (TAA) in TAVR patients with severe PAD.
Patients with PAD and hostile femoral access (TFA impossible, or possible only after percutaneous treatment) undergoing TAVR at 28 international centers were included in this registry. The primary endpoint was the propensity-adjusted risk of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), or main access site-related Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 major vascular complications. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using a novel risk score (Hostile score).
Among the 1,707 patients included in the registry, 518 (30.3%) underwent TAVR with TFA after percutaneous treatment, 642 (37.6%) with TTA, and 547 (32.0%) with TAA (mostly transaxillary). Compared with TTA, both TFA (adjusted HR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.45-0.75) and TAA (adjusted HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47-0.78) were associated with lower 30-day rates of MAE, driven by fewer access site-related complications. Composite risks at 1 year were also lower with TFA and TAA compared with TTA. TFA compared with TAA was associated with lower 1-year risk of stroke/TIA (adjusted HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.24-0.98), a finding confined to patients with low Hostile scores (Pinteraction = 0.049).
Among patients with PAD undergoing TAVR, both TFA and TAA were associated with lower 30-day and 1-year rates of MAE compared with TTA, but 1-year stroke/TIA rates were higher with TAA compared with TFA.

暂无摘要。

Many patients perceive persistent symptoms and impairment in their quality of life after COVID-19. The critical patient is vulnerable to presenting physical and emotional alterations. The objective of this study is to assess the functional evolution and quality of life of the critical patient due to COVID-19.
A prospective longitudinal multicenter study was carried out in critically ill hospitalized patients due to COVID-19 with a 6 month follow-up. Sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, the persistence of symptoms, SPPB scale, pulmonary and respiratory impact, CT scan, Barthel index, neuropsychological variables, physical activity (IPAQ scale), quality of life (Euroqol), and satisfaction were collected.
115 patients were included. 75% are male and 86% are obese or overweight. The average time of hospitalization was 38.1±18.4 days, with 80.9% requiring mechanical ventilation. 25% need help from another person for self-care at discharge. 29.2% had a normal CT lung screening at 134.1+70.9 days. At 6 months, functional recovery is favorable, although 36.5% perceive muscle weakness and 22% present fragility. 36.5% of patients report a lack of concentration. The most affected dimension in quality of life is that referred to pain (53%), followed by anxiety or depression. Most perform low physical activity. Satisfaction with clinical follow-up is high.
In post-critical patients due to COVID-19, physical, functional, and quality of life alterations prevail at 6 months after hospital discharge.

Patients with severe COVID-19 can develop painful range-of-motion restrictions of large joints due to heterotopic ossification. We present the case of a patient who developed hip pain after prolonged admission for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Conventional radiography, computed tomography and bone scan showed extensive heterotopic ossification in the hips. It is probable that both local and systemic factors contribute to the development of heterotopic ossifications and it is necessary to rule out this entity when these patients reported joint pain. Early diagnosis is important to provide non-pharmacological interventions such as mild passive mobilization and anti-inflammatory medication and in refractory cases surgical resection of the ectopic bone is consider.

In the early stage of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), most cases are identified as mild or moderate illnesses. Approximately 20% of hospitalised patients become severe or critical at the middle or late stage of the disease. The predictors and risk factors for prognosis in those with mild or moderate disease remain to be determined. Of 694 patients with COVID-19, 231 patients with mild or moderate disease, who were hospitalised at 10 hospitals in Wenzhou and nearby counties in China, were enrolled in this retrospective study from 17 January to 20 March 2020. The outcomes of these patients included progression from mild/moderate illness to severe or critical conditions. Among the 231 patients, 49 (21.2%) had a poor prognosis in the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that higher inflammation/coagulopathy/immunology responsive index (ICIRI=[c-reactive protein × fibrinogen × D-dimer]/CD8 T cell count) on admission (OR=345.151, 95% CI=23.014-5176.318) was associated with increased odds ratios for poor prognosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ICIRI predicting severe and critical condition progression was 0.65 (95% CI=0.519-0.782) and 0.80 (95% CI=0.647-0.954), with cut-off values of 870.83 and 535.44, respectively. Conversely, age, sex, comorbidity, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, CD8 T cell count, and c-reactive protein, fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels alone at admission were not good predictors of poor prognosis in patients with mild or moderate COVID-19. At admission, a novel index, ICIRI, tends to be the most promising predictor of COVID-19 progression from mild or moderate illness to severe or critical conditions.