coronavirus infection

冠状病毒感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),由SARS-CoV-2引起的,对全球健康产生了负面影响。COVID-19与多种自身免疫性疾病和炎症性疾病有关,使其呼吸表现复杂化。SARS-CoV-2引发可能涉及多个器官和系统的炎症反应。IgA参与冠状病毒感染免疫反应的证据越来越多,特别是在IgA免疫复合物沉积疾病如IgA血管炎(IgAV)和IgA肾病的情况下。本报告介绍了一名53岁男子由SARS-CoV-2引起的IgAV病例。他的症状包括乳头状瘤,鲜红的皮疹,整个身体的荨麻疹,口疮性口炎,所有关节和肌肉疼痛,弱点,萎靡不振,腹痛,面部肿胀,和动脉高血压(160/100mmHg)。他接受静脉注射甲基强的松龙(250毫克),然后口服甲基强的松龙(16毫克)治疗,这改善了他的状况。这种改善包括腹部和关节痛以及皮疹的消失。本文还提供了SARS-CoV-2后已发表的IgAV病例的概述。它可以提醒风湿病学家和相关专家IgAV的临床特征,并指导他们如何诊断和治疗这种疾病。
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, has negatively affected global health. COVID-19 has been associated with a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, complicating its respiratory manifestations. SARS-CoV-2 triggers inflammatory reactions which may involve multiple organs and systems. The proof for IgA involvement in the immune reactions to coronavirus infection is growing, particularly in the case of IgA immune complex deposition diseases such as IgA vasculitis (IgAV) and IgA nephropathy.This report presents a case of IgAV caused by SARS-CoV-2 in a 53-year-old man. His symptoms included papillomatous, bright red rashes, urticaria throughout the body, aphthous stomatitis, pain in all joints and muscles, weakness, malaise, abdominal pain, face swelling, and arterial hypertension (160/100 mmHg). He received intravenous methylprednisolone (250 mg) and then oral methylprednisolone (16 mg) treatment, which improved his condition. This improvement included the disappearance of abdominal and joint pain and skin rashes.This article also provides an overview of published cases of IgAV after SARS-CoV-2. It may alert rheumatologists and allied specialists of clinical features of IgAV and guide them how to diagnose and treat this disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年冠状病毒病后(COVID-19)症状被广泛报道。然而,Omicron变异体感染后COVID-19后疾病的数据仍然很少。这项前瞻性研究是为了了解患病率,模式,以及从COVID-19中康复的患者的症状持续时间。
    方法:在德里的11个地区进行了一项前瞻性研究,印度,在从COVID-19中康复的个体中。研究参与者被纳入,然后以3个月和6个月的间隔返回恢复后随访。
    结果:研究参与者的平均年龄为42.07岁,标准差为14.89年。大多数参与者(79.7%)报告经历了COVID-19后症状。最常见的症状包括关节痛(36.0%),持续干咳(35.7%),焦虑(28.4%),呼吸急促(27.1%)。其他症状为持续性疲乏(21.6%),持续性头痛(20.0%),健忘(19.7%),和四肢无力(18.6%)。症状持续时间最长为焦虑(138.75±54.14天),其次是疲劳(137.57±48.33天),呼吸急促(131.89±60.21天),和关节痛/肿胀(131.59±58.76天)。在第一次后续访问中,2.2%的参与者表现出异常的心电图读数,但在第二次随访期间未发现异常.此外,4.06%的参与者在第一次随访时表现出异常的胸部X线检查结果,第二次访问时下降至2.16%。
    结论:COVID-19后最常见的症状是关节痛,干咳,焦虑和呼吸急促。这些临床症状持续长达6个月,有多系统参与的证据。因此,研究结果强调了在COVID-19后期间进行长期随访的必要性。
    BACKGROUND: Post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms were widely reported. However, data on post-COVID-19 conditions following infection with the Omicron variant remained scarce. This prospective study was conducted to understand the prevalence, patterns, and duration of symptoms in patients who had recovered from COVID-19.
    METHODS: A prospective study was conducted across 11 districts of Delhi, India, among individuals who had recovered from COVID-19. Study participants were enrolled, and then returned for post-recovery follow-up at 3 months and 6 months interval.
    RESULTS: The mean age of study participants was 42.07 years, with a standard deviation of 14.89 years. The majority of the participants (79.7%) reported experiencing post-COVID-19 symptoms. The most common symptoms included joint pain (36.0%), persistent dry cough (35.7%), anxiety (28.4%), and shortness of breath (27.1%). Other symptoms were persistent fatigue (21.6%), persistent headache (20.0%), forgetfulness (19.7%), and limb weakness (18.6%). The longest duration of symptom was observed to be anxiety (138.75±54.14 days), followed by fatigue (137.57±48.33 days), shortness of breath (131.89±60.21 days), and joint pain/swelling (131.59±58.76 days). At the first follow-up visit, 2.2% of participants presented with abnormal electrocardiogram readings, but no abnormalities were noticed during the second follow-up. Additionally, 4.06% of participants exhibited abnormal chest X-ray findings at the first followup, which decreased to 2.16% by the second visit.
    CONCLUSIONS: The most frequently reported post-COVID-19 symptoms were joint pain, dry cough, anxiety and shortness of breath. These clinical symptoms persisted for up to 6 months, with evidence of multi-system involvement. Consequently, findings highlighted the need for long-term follow-up during the post-COVID-19 period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate clinical features and outcomes in patients with cavitary lung lesions and COVID-19 associated pneumonia.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of electronic medical records of 8261 patients with COVID-19 was performed. We selected 40 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Sex, age, hospital-stay, lung tissue lesion, comorbidities, treatment, methods of respiratory support, complications and outcomes were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Cavitary lung lesions were more common in men (67.5%). Age of patients ranged from 28 to 88 (mean 64.9±13.7) years. Hospital-stay in patients with cavitary lung lesions was 9-58 (median 27.5) days. There were 18 complications in 14 (35%) patients. Pneumothorax, isolated pneumomediastinum, pleural empyema, hemoptysis and sigmoid colon perforation were considered as complications of cavitary lung lesions. Nine (22.5%) patients died (5 of them with complications). Three patients died after surgical treatment. Long-term results were analyzed in 8 (25.8%) patients. Patients were followed-up for 3 months after discharge. Shrinkage of lesions occurred after 7-60 (mean 23) days, and complete obliteration of cavities came after 32 (range 14-90) days.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cavitary lung lesions are a rare complication of COVID-19 pneumonia. There was no significant correlation of complications with age, sex, therapy, volume of lung lesions and non-invasive ventilation (NIV). Despite more common fatal outcomes in older patients undergoing NIV, the last one was prescribed exclusively due to disease progression and respiratory failure. Further research on this problem is necessary to identify possible risk factors of cavitary lung lesions.
    UNASSIGNED: Демонстрация клинических особенностей и исходов лечения пациентов с полостными образованиями легких при COVID-19-пневмонии.
    UNASSIGNED: Проведен ретроспективный анализ электронных медицинских карт 8261 пациента с подтвержденным диагнозом COVID-19. Всего были отобраны 40 пациентов, отвечающих критериям включения. Оценивали пол, возраст, длительность госпитализации, объем поражения легочной ткани по данным высокоразрешающей компьютерной томографии органов груди (ВРКТ), сопутствующие заболевания, лечение, методы респираторной поддержки, осложнения и исходы госпитализации.
    UNASSIGNED: Чаще всего полостные образования (ПО) легких обнаруживали у мужчин (67,5%), их возраст варьировал от 28 до 88 лет (средний возраст 64,9±13,7 года). Пациенты с ПО находились в стационаре от 9 до 58 дней, медиана продолжительности госпитализации составила 27,5 (23) сут. У 14 (35%) пациентов с ПО всего было выявлено 18 осложнений. В качестве осложнений ПО рассматривались пневмоторакс, изолированный пневмомедиастинум, эмпиема плевры, кровохарканье, перфорация сигмовидной кишки. Умерли 9 (22,5%) пациентов (5 из них с осложнениями). Среди пациентов, получивших оперативное лечение, умерли трое. Отдаленные результаты удалось проследить у 8 (25,8%) пациентов. Пациенты находились под наблюдением в течение 3 мес после выписки. Сроки появления положительной динамики в виде уменьшения полостей на ВРКТ варьировали от 7 до 60 дней (в среднем 23 дня), а полная облитерация полостей среди обсервационных пациентов наступала в среднем на 32-е сутки (от 14 до 90 дней).
    UNASSIGNED: ПО являются редким осложнением течения COVID-19-пневмонии. При этом у пациентов с ПО статистически значимой зависимости развития осложнений от возраста, пола, получаемой терапии, объема поражения легких на ВРКТ, проведения неинвазивной вентиляции легких (НВЛ) выявлено не было. Несмотря на то что летальный исход чаще наступал у пациентов более старшего возраста и на фоне проведения НВЛ, ее назначение связано исключительно с прогрессированием заболевания и нарастанием дыхательной недостаточности, а не как вариант лечения пациентов с ПО. Дальнейшие исследования по данной проблеме необходимы для выявления возможных факторов риска появления ПО, в том числе НВЛ.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自从COVID-19大流行开始以来,维生素D由于其免疫调节特性而引起了人们的兴趣。大量研究表明,维生素D水平与COVID-19病例和死亡率之间存在相关性。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估补充维生素D3与COVID-19严重程度之间的关系.我们纳入了13项随机临床试验,其中包含分析的终点:COVID-19住院时间,重症监护病房(ICU)的入院人数,在ICU的停留时间,需要任何补充氧合的病例数量,任何补充充氧的持续时间,与COVID-19相关的总死亡率和死亡人数。计算95%置信区间(CI)的相对危险度和95%CI的平均差来比较效果。使用随机效应模型来计算效应大小。我们的荟萃分析显示补充维生素D3对ICU入院有积极影响(RR=0.73;95%CI[0.57;0.95],p=0.02,I2=19.6%),患者的死亡率与COVID-19相关(RR=0.56;95%CI[0.34;0.91];p=0.02;I2=0%)。补充维生素D3可能会降低入住ICU和与COVID-19相关的死亡风险。
    Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, vitamin D has attracted interest due to its immunomodulatory properties. Numerous studies show a correlation between vitamin D levels and COVID-19 cases and mortality. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis in order to assess the relationship between vitamin D3 supplementation and COVID-19 severity. We included 13 randomized clinical trials that contained the analyzed endpoints: length of COVID-19 hospitalization, number of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, length of stay in the ICU, number of cases requiring any supplemental oxygenation, duration of any supplemental oxygenation, number of overall mortality and number of deaths associated with COVID-19. The relative risk with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the mean difference with 95% CI were calculated to compare the effect. A random effects model was used to calculate effect sizes. Our meta-analysis showed a positive effect of vitamin D3 supplementation on ICU admission (RR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.57; 0.95], p = 0.02, I2 = 19.6%) and mortality associated with COVID-19 among patients (RR = 0.56; 95% CI [0.34; 0.91]; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). Vitamin D3 supplementation may potentially reduce the risk of ICU admission and death associated with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk factors of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 pneumonia.
    METHODS: A retrospective study included 8261 patients with COVID-19 between April 2020 and March 2022. Inclusion criteria: age >18 years, COVID-19 confirmed by polymerase chain reaction. Two cohorts of patients were formed: 40 patients with pulmonary cavitation and 40 patients without these lesions. Both groups were comparable in age, lung lesion volume and oxygenation. Sex, age, length of hospital-stay, CT grade of lung lesion, comorbidities, treatment, respiratory support, oxygen saturation and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated. The highest lung lesion volume during hospitalization was assessed. CT was performed upon admission and approximately every 5 days for evaluation of treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corporation, USA).
    RESULTS: Patients with pulmonary cavitation significantly differed in age, SpO2, lung lesion volume, more common non-invasive ventilation and prolonged hospital-stay. Cardiovascular diseases were more common in both groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, cardiovascular diseases, CT-based severity of lung damage, absence of biological therapy and non-invasive ventilation as risk factors of pulmonary cavitation. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, these predictors were CT-based severity of lung damage and absence of biological therapy. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that pulmonary cavitation had no significant effect on mortality (OR=2.613, 95% CI: 0.732-9.322, p=0.139).
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk of pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is directly related to advanced lung damage and untimely or absent biological therapy with IL-6 inhibitors. Pulmonary cavitation in COVID-19 is not a typical manifestation of disease and can be caused by some factors: fungal infection, secondary bacterial infection, tuberculosis and pulmonary infarction. Further study of this problem is required to develop diagnostic algorithms and treatment tactics.
    UNASSIGNED: Определить факторы риска появления полостных образований легких при COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: Проведено ретроспективное исследование электронных медицинских карт 8261 пациента, которые прошли лечение по поводу COVID-19 в Университетской Клинической Больнице №4 Сеченовского Университета в период с апреля 2020 по март 2022 г. Критериями включения были возраст старше 18 лет и диагноз COVID-19, подтвержденный методом полимеразной цепной реакции (ПЦР) в образце биоматериала из ротоглотки и носоглотки. Были сформированы 2 когорты пациентов: 40 пациентов с полостными образованиями (ПО) легких и 40 пациентов без ПО легких. Пациенты обеих групп были сопоставимы по возрасту, объему поражения легких и оксигенации. Оценивались пол, возраст, длительность госпитализации, объем поражения легочной ткани по данным высокоразрешающей компьютерной томографии органов груди (ВРКТ), сопутствующие заболевания, лечение, методы респираторной поддержки, самый высокий и самый низкий показатели сатурации кислорода (SpO2) при дыхании атмосферным воздухом и исходы госпитализации. По ВРКТ оценивался наибольший объем поражения легких в ходе госпитализации. ВРКТ выполнялась в приемном отделении при госпитализации и, приблизительно, каждые 5 сут для динамической оценки проводимого лечения. Статистическая обработка данных осуществлялась с использованием программного обеспечения SPSS Statistics 26 (StatSoft Inc., США).
    UNASSIGNED: Больные с ПО статистически значимо отличались по возрасту, SpO2, объему поражения легочной ткани, более частому назначению неинвазивной вентиляции легких (НВЛ), а также длительности госпитализации. В обеих группах чаще встречались заболевания сердечно-сосудистой системы. При однофакторном логистическом регрессионном анализе возраст, наличие сердечно-сосудистого заболевания, выраженность КТ-изменений паренхимы легких, отсутствие биологической терапии, респираторная поддержка в виде НВЛ были ассоциированы с увеличением риска формирования ПО. При многомерном логистическом регрессионном анализе выявлено, что выраженность КТ-изменений паренхимы легких и отсутствие биологической терапии являются независимыми предикторами формирования ПО. Одномерный логистический регрессионный анализ продемонстрировал, что наличие ПО статистически значимо не влияло на летальность (отношение шансов 2,613; 95% доверительный интервал 0,732—9,322; p=0,139).
    UNASSIGNED: Риск развития ПО в легких при COVID-19 напрямую связан с бóльшим объемом поражения легких и несвоевременно проведенной или не проведенной вовсе биологической терапией ингибиторами ИЛ-6. Кавитации в легких при COVID-19 не являются типичным для заболевания проявлением и могут быть вызваны рядом причин: грибковой инфекцией, вторичной бактериальной инфекцией, туберкулезом, инфарктом легкого. Требуется дальнейшее изучение данной проблемы для разработки диагностических алгоритмов и определения тактики лечения.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,临床医生建议采用易清醒定位(APP)以避免最坏的结果.这项研究的目的是调查APP是否能减少插管,急性COVID-19的死亡率和住院时间(HLOS)。
    方法:我们对在马瑙斯的参考中心住院的非机械通气患者进行了回顾性队列研究,巴西,2020年。参与者被分为APP和清醒不倾向定位(ANPP)组。此外,我们进行了系统评价并进行了荟萃分析,以了解该干预措施在资源有限的环境中是否具有不同的结局(PROSPEROCRD4202342452).
    结果:共有115名参与者被分配到这些组中。两组插管时间(HR:0.861;95CI:0.474-1.1562;p=0.622)和死亡时间(HR:1.666;95CI:0.939-2.951;p=0.081)无统计学差异。APP与HLOS降低无显著相关性。系统评价共纳入86篇,其中76人(88,3%)在APP后表现出类似的发现。此外,低/中,和高收入国家在此类结果方面相似。
    结论:COVID-19中的APP没有出现影响死亡率的临床改善,插管率和HLOS。缺乏倾向位置协议,通过对照研究获得是必要的。三年后,APP的好处仍然没有定论。
    UNASSIGNED: During the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, clinicians recommended awake-prone positioning (APP) to avoid the worst outcomes. The objectives of this study were to investigate if APP reduces intubation, death rates, and hospital length of stay (HLOS) in acute COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective cohort with non-mechanically ventilated patients hospitalized in a reference center in Manaus, Brazil, 2020. Participants were stratified into APP and awake-not-prone positioning (ANPP) groups. Also, we conducted a systematic review and performed a meta-analysis to understand if this intervention had different outcomes in resource-limited settings (PROSPERO CRD42023422452).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 115 participants were allocated into the groups. There was no statistical difference between both groups regarding time to intubation (HR: 0.861; 95CI: 0.474-1.1562; p=0.622) and time to death (HR: 1.666; 95CI: 0.939-2.951; p=0.081). APP was not significantly associated with reduced HLOS. A total of 86 articles were included in the systematic review, of which 76 (88,3%) show similar findings after APP. Also, low/middle, and high-income countries were similar regarding such outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: APP in COVID-19 does not present clinical improvement that affects mortality, intubation rate and HLOS. The lack of a prone position protocol, obtained through a controlled study, is necessary. After 3 years, APP benefits are still inconclusive.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AF)是临床实践中最常见的心律紊乱。它恶化了患者的生活质量,由于其与血栓栓塞并发症的高风险相关,导致死亡率增加。当前新的冠状病毒感染的大流行,始于2020年3月,以心血管疾病的增加为标志,包括房颤患者数量的增加。这就是为什么找到有关AF和冠状病毒感染的关联和相互影响的问题的答案以降低血管并发症的风险的原因。然而,该领域的大多数研究都集中在医院患者身上。在这项研究中,门诊房颤患者的电子数据库,分析了包括有COVID-19感染史的患者,以评估并发症的最重要危险因素.
    Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder in clinical practice. It worsens the quality of life of patients, leads to an increase in the mortality rate because of its association with a high risk of thromboembolic complications. The current pandemic of a new coronavirus infection, which began in March 2020, was marked by an increase in cardiovascular diseases, including an increase in the number of patients with AF. That is why it is extremely relevant to find answers to questions about the association and mutual influence of AF and coronavirus infection to reduce the risk of vascular complications. However, most research in this area has focused on hospital patients. In this study, an electronic database of outpatients with AF, including patients with a history of COVID-19 infection was analyzed in order to assess the most significant risk factors for complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在2020年早期冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,研究人员警告该病毒的潜在神经侵袭能力和长期神经系统后果。尽管一些初步研究发现沟通延迟,精细电机,以及COVID-19感染后婴儿的解决问题的能力,关于被诊断为COVID-19的新生儿的长期发展的数据仍然很少。
    方法:我们对20名在第一波大流行期间(2020年4月至7月)感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)的新生儿进行了前瞻性研究。在18-24个月校正年龄,我们通过Bayley婴儿和幼儿发育量表评估神经发育,第三版(BSID-III),随着成长,听力,和愿景评估。
    结果:评估时的平均校正年龄为21个月11天±1个月28天。我们发现近一半的儿童在BSID-III域中得分均低于一个标准差。任一电机的轻度延迟,认知,9名(45%)儿童发现或语言领域,2名(10%)儿童发现中度延迟。富有表现力的语言,精细电机,接受性语言主要受到影响。没有孩子有听力障碍,失明,或显著的生长步履蹒跚,包括临床上严重的小头畸形。平均复合认知,语言,神经发育迟缓患者的运动评分明显较低(p值分别为0.02,0.000和0.03),其疾病特征无任何差异.
    结论:感染SARS-CoV-2的新生儿表达语言发育迟缓的风险增加,精细电机,和接受语言能力在18-24个月大。延误的严重程度主要是轻微的。
    BACKGROUND: During the early coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, researchers cautioned about the potential neuroinvasive capability of the virus and long-term neurological consequences. Although a few preliminary studies have found delayed communication, fine motor, and problem-solving skills in infants after COVID-19 infection, there continues to be a paucity of data on long-term development of neonates diagnosed with COVID-19.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 20 neonates who acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the first wave of the pandemic (April-July 2020). At 18-24 months corrected age, we assessed neurodevelopment by Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, the third edition (BSID-III), along with growth, hearing, and vision evaluation.
    RESULTS: The mean corrected age at assessment was 21 months 11 days ± 1 month 28 days. We found developmental delay in nearly half of the children with scores below one standard deviation in either of the BSID-III domains. Mild delay in either motor, cognitive, or language domains was found in 9 (45%) children and moderate delay in 2 (10%). Expressive language, fine motor, and receptive language were predominantly affected. None of the children had hearing impairment, blindness, or significant growth faltering including clinically severe microcephaly. The mean composite cognitive, language, and motor scores were significantly lower in those with neurodevelopmental delay (p value - 0.02, 0.000, and 0.03, respectively) without any differences in their disease characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neonates infected with SARS-CoV-2 have an increased risk of developmental delays in expressive language, fine motor, and receptive language skills at 18-24 months of age. The severity of delays is predominantly mild.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们测量了散装疫苗产品(BVP)和成品疫苗QazCovid-in®中的细菌内毒素水平,并评估了氢氧化铝(佐剂)对LAL测试结果和体内样品热原性的影响(在接受静脉注射的兔子中)。用LPS给予BVP导致兔体温的剂量依赖性升高,类似于单独由LPS引起的升高。这表明疫苗中的氢氧化铝不会影响兔子的热原反应。此外,LAL测试表明,在连续稀释样品后,氢氧化铝不会阻碍LPS活性。
    We measured the levels of bacterial endotoxins in the bulk vaccine product (BVP) and finished vaccine QazCovid-in® and evaluated the effect of aluminum hydroxide (adjuvant) on the results of LAL test and pyrogenicity of samples in vivo (in rabbits receiving intravenous injection into the marginal ear vein). Administration of BVP with LPS resulted in a dose-dependent increase in body temperature in rabbits similar to that caused by LPS alone, which suggests that aluminum hydroxide in the vaccine did not affect the pyrogenic response in rabbits. Moreover, the LAL test showed that the aluminum hydroxide did not hinder LPS activity after serial dilution of samples.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    比较一家私立四级转诊医院,公立三级医院,和一家致力于COVID-19患者的野战医院,关于患者的特征,临床参数,实验室,影像学发现,以及确诊为COVID-19的患者的结局。
    回顾性多中心观察研究,评估临床,453例COVID-19患者的实验室和CT数据,以及他们的结局(出院或入院,重症监护室入院,需要机械通风,和COVID-19引起的死亡率)。
    患者的平均年龄为55岁(±16岁),其中58.1%为男性,41.9%为女性。考虑到护理医院的分层,在呼吸困难方面观察到显著差异,发烧,咳嗽,高血压,糖尿病参数,和CT评分(p<0.05)。病房入院率有显著差异,私立医院的比率较低(40.0%),其次是公立医院(74.1%),野战医院发病率较高(89.4%)。关于重症监护室的入院,公立医院的比率较高(25.2%),其次是私立医院(15.5%),野战医院的比率较低(9.9%)。在对出院和死亡结果的分析中,结果发现,从私家医院出院的患者人数较多(94.2%),与野战医院(90.1%)和公立医院(82.3%)相比,公立医院(17.7%)的死亡人数高于私立医院和野战医院(分别为5.8%和0%)。
    在圣保罗市的公共和私人卫生系统中,对第一波接受COVID-19治疗的人群的数据进行的分析显示,人群之间存在统计学上的显着差异,反映不同的结果。
    To compare a private quaternary referral hospital, a public tertiary hospital, and a field hospital dedicated to patients with COVID-19, regarding patients\' characteristics, clinical parameters, laboratory, imaging findings, and outcomes of patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19.
    Retrospective multicenter observational study that assessed the association of clinical, laboratory and CT data of 453 patients with COVID-19, and also their outcomes (hospital discharge or admission, intensive care unit admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality caused by COVID-19).
    The mean age of patients was 55 years (±16 years), 58.1% of them were male, and 41.9% were female. Considering stratification by the hospital of care, significant differences were observed in the dyspnea, fever, cough, hypertension, diabetes mellitus parameters, and CT score (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in ward admission rates, with a lower rate in the private hospital (40.0%), followed by the public hospital (74.1%), and a higher rate in the field hospital (89.4%). Regarding intensive care unit admission, there was a higher rate in the public hospital (25.2%), followed by the private hospital (15.5%), and a lower rate in the field hospital (9.9%). In the analysis of the discharge and death outcomes, it was found that there was a higher number of patients discharged from the private hospital (94.2%), compared to the field hospital (90.1%) and public hospital (82.3%) and a higher number of deaths in the public hospital (17.7%) compared to the private hospital and field hospital (5.8 and 0% respectively).
    The analysis of the data regarding the population treated with COVID-19 during the first wave in different levels of care in the public and private health systems in the city of São Paulo revealed statistically significant differences between the populations, reflecting distinct outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号