cause

原因
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建立因果关系在生物学和医学中至关重要。然而,在生命和健康科学的各个领域,各种因果关系的概念在不同的时间被实施。虽然从历史或科学社会学的角度来看这是可以预期的,因为不同的账户可能对应于在不同时间以及生物学和医学的不同领域建立因果关系的价值,对于当今这些领域的演员来说,这可能是一个惊喜。如果,随着时间的推移,因果关系还没有被完全驳回,然后他们可能会邀请某种形式的,可能有益的,解释性多元化。
    结论:在二战后的几十年里,心身医学可以提出心理因素引起躯体疾病。但是今天,在提出任何因果关系之前,大多数药物必须符合随机临床试验的标准。相反,在生物学中,机制似乎是最有价值的因果话语来解释兴趣现象是如何产生的。这里,重点将是心理神经免疫学,涉及神经系统和免疫系统之间相互作用的跨学科研究领域,在行为和健康之间,考虑了心理因素与癌症之间的因果关系。
    结论:当涉及到心理因素与癌症之间联系的因果解释时,请心理神经免疫学考虑这些联系的方向性问题,以及什么因素以及如何导致癌症。
    BACKGROUND: Establishing causal relationships is essential in biology and medicine. However, various notions of causality have been operationalized at different times in various fields of the life and health sciences. While this is expected from a history or sociology of science point of view, as different accounts may correspond to what is valued in terms of establishing causal relationships at different times as well as in different fields of biology and medicine, this may come as a surprise for a present-day actor in those fields. If, over time, causal accounts have not been fully dismissed, then they are likely to invite some form of, potentially salutary, explanatory pluralism.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the decades following WWII, psychosomatic medicine could propose that psychological factors cause somatic diseases. But today, most medicine has to meet the standard of a randomized clinical trial before any causal relationship can be proposed. Instead, in biology, mechanisms seem to be the most-valued causal discourse to explain how phenomena of interest are brought about. Here, the focus will be on how psychoneuroimmunology, an interdisciplinary research field addressing interactions between the nervous system and immune system, and between behavior and health, has considered causal relationships between psychological factors and cancer.
    CONCLUSIONS: When it comes to causal explanations of links between psychological factors and cancer, psychoneuroimmunology is invited to consider the question of the directionality of these links as well as what and how factors causally contribute to cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全球,75%的新生儿死亡发生在生命的头几周,超过43%的死亡发生在撒哈拉以南非洲地区。与健康相关的政策制定者和决策者需要使用循证治疗,以减少早期新生儿死亡的时间和相关预测因素。然而,关于中位生存时间的研究有限,cause,发病率,以及研究区域和国家的预测因子。因此,本研究的目的是评估时间,新生儿早期死亡的原因,以及埃塞俄比亚西北部BahirDar市公立医院新生儿重症监护病房收治的新生儿的预测因素。
    对2023年2月22日至4月22日通过系统抽样选择的387例早期新生儿进行了基于机构的前瞻性随访研究设计。统计软件,Epi数据4.6版和Stata14版用于输入和分析,分别。通过Schoenfeld残差检验和Cox-Snell残差检验检验了比例风险假设和模型适合度,分别。描述性统计,卡普兰-迈耶曲线,寿命表用于描述变量。拟合Cox回归分析模型以确定早期新生儿死亡的预测因子。
    在随访期间,59例(15.25%)早期新生儿死亡,发生率为31.79/1,000早期新生儿天[95%置信区间(CI):0.024-0.041]。新生儿早期死亡的主要原因是早产并发症,窒息,脓毒症,胎粪吸入综合征,和坏死性小肠结肠炎.平均生存时间为2.72天。从多胎母亲出生[调整危险比(AHR)4.34;95%CI:1.63-11.55],一个伟大的多重妊娠母亲(AHR3.50;95%CI:1.12-10.95),呼吸窘迫综合征(AHR2.60;95%CI:1.03-6.58),出生窒息(AHR7.51;95%CI:2.30-24.51),胎龄较小(AHR2.05;95%CI:1.08-4.92),无法纯母乳喂养(AHR3.46;95%CI:1.52-7.88)是新生儿早期死亡时间的显著相关预测因子.
    新生儿早期死亡的发生率很高,平均生存时间为2.72天。重力,呼吸窘迫综合征,出生窒息,无法完全母乳喂养被确定为早期新生儿死亡的预测因素。因此,未来的研究将包括多中心的长期前瞻性随访研究,全国水平。
    UNASSIGNED: Globally, 75% of neonatal deaths occur during the first weeks of life and more than 43% of deaths are covered by sub-Saharan Africa. Health-related policymakers and decision-makers need to use evidence-based treatments to reduce the time to early neonatal death and associated predictors. However, there are limited studies on median survival time, cause, incidence, and predictors in the study area as well as the country. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess time, the cause of early neonatal death, and its predictors among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units at Bahir Dar City public hospitals in northwest Ethiopia.
    UNASSIGNED: An institution-based prospective follow-up study design was conducted among 387 early neonates selected by systematic sampling between 22 February and 22 April 2023. Statistical software, Epi Data version 4.6 and Stata version 14, was used for entry and analysis, respectively. Proportional hazard assumption and model fitness were checked by the Schoenfeld residual test and the Cox-Snell residual test, respectively. Descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier curve, and the life table were used to describe variables. The Cox regression analysis model was fitted to identify the predictors of early neonatal death.
    UNASSIGNED: During the follow-up time, 59 (15.25%) early neonates died, with an incidence of 31.79 per 1,000 early neonate days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.024-0.041]. The leading causes of early neonatal death were prematurity complications, asphyxia, sepsis, meconium aspiration syndrome, and necrotizing enterocolitis. The mean survival time was 2.72 days. Being born from a multigravida mother [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 4.34; 95% CI: 1.63-11.55], a grand multigravida mother (AHR 3.50; 95% CI: 1.12-10.95), respiratory distress syndrome (AHR 2.60; 95% CI: 1.03-6.58), birth asphyxia (AHR 7.51; 95% CI: 2.30-24.51), a small gestational age (AHR 2.05; 95% CI: 1.08-4.92), and being unable to exclusively breastfeed (AHR 3.46; 95% CI: 1.52-7.88) were significantly associated predictors for time to early neonatal death.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of early neonatal death was high, and the mean survival time was 2.72 days. Gravidity, respiratory distress syndrome, birth asphyxia, and being unable to exclusively breastfeed were identified as predictors of early neonatal death. Therefore, future research will consist of long-term prospective follow-up studies at a multicenter, nationwide level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:采用WHO近错过方法探讨孕产妇近错过(MNM)的危险因素。
    方法:数据来源于湖南省孕产妇近失踪监测系统,中国,2012-2022年。多变量逻辑回归分析(方法:远期,Wald,α=0.05)和调整后的比值比(aOR)用于识别MNM的危险因素。
    结果:我们的研究包括780,359名妇女,731,185名活产,共有2461个(0.32%)跨国公司,777,846(99.68%)非跨国公司,52例(0.006%)产妇死亡。MNM比率为3.37‰(95CI:3.23-3.50)。凝血/血液学功能障碍是MNM的最常见原因(75.66%)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示MNM的危险因素:产妇年龄>=30岁(aOR>1,P<0.05),未婚女性(aOR=2.21,95CI:1.71-2.85),妊娠次数>=2(aOR>1,P<0.05),无效奇偶校验(aOR=1.51,95CI:1.32-1.72)或奇偶校验>=3(aOR=1.95,95CI:1.50-2.55),产前检查<5次(AOR=1.13,95CI:1.01-1.27),剖宫产次数为1(aOR=1.83,95CI:1.64-2.04)或>=2(aOR=2.48,95CI:1.99-3.09)。
    结论:湖南省MNM比率相对较低。高龄产妇,未婚状态,大量的怀孕,无效奇偶校验或高奇偶校验,产前检查次数少,剖宫产是MNM的危险因素。我们的研究对于提高孕产妇保健质量和预防MNM至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the risk factors for maternal near-miss (MNM) using the WHO near-miss approach.
    METHODS: Data were obtained from the Maternal Near-Miss Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2012-2022. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (method: Forward, Wald, α = 0.05) and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were used to identify risk factors for MNM.
    RESULTS: Our study included 780,359 women with 731,185 live births, a total of 2461 (0.32%) MNMs, 777,846 (99.68%) non-MNMs, and 52 (0.006%) maternal deaths were identified. The MNM ratio was 3.37‰ (95%CI: 3.23-3.50). Coagulation/hematological dysfunction was the most common cause of MNM (75.66%). Results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed risk factors for MNM: maternal age > = 30 years old (aOR > 1, P < 0.05), unmarried women (aOR = 2.21, 95%CI: 1.71-2.85), number of pregnancies > = 2 (aOR > 1, P < 0.05), nulliparity (aOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.32-1.72) or parity > = 3 (aOR = 1.95, 95%CI: 1.50-2.55), prenatal examinations < 5 times (aOR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.27), and number of cesarean sections was 1 (aOR = 1.83, 95%CI: 1.64-2.04) or > = 2 (aOR = 2.48, 95%CI: 1.99-3.09).
    CONCLUSIONS: The MNM ratio was relatively low in Hunan Province. Advanced maternal age, unmarried status, a high number of pregnancies, nulliparity or high parity, a low number of prenatal examinations, and cesarean sections were risk factors for MNM. Our study is essential for improving the quality of maternal health care and preventing MNM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脾梗死在临床实践中是罕见的事件,通过CT扫描诊断。有很多原因。他们经常决定给予的治疗。然而,在病因学调查方面没有达成共识。
    方法:我们在这里对文献进行了几乎系统的回顾,基于Pubmed从1991年到2022年的数据。使用关键词\"脾梗死\",从1893年参考文献中,本综述包括11项队列研究和867例临床病例。不包括使用拉丁字母以外的语言编写的文章。
    结论:对这些不同研究的分析使我们能够尽可能详尽地列出脾梗死的病因。最常见的是栓塞性心脏病,血液恶性肿瘤,实体瘤形成和某些感染。文献中的描述主要基于孤立的临床病例,并不总是能够与所描述的疾病建立因果关系,尤其是报告的脾梗死病例中约有20%无症状且可能偶然发现。根据这篇文献综述的发现,我们提出了脾梗死病因评估方案.
    BACKGROUND: Splenic infarction is a rare event in clinical practice, diagnosed by CT scan. There are many causes. They often determine the treatment given. However, there is no consensus on etiological investigations.
    METHODS: We present here an almost systematic review of the literature, based on data available on Pubmed from 1991 to 2022. Using the keywords \"splenic infarct\", from 1893 references, 11 cohort studies and 867 clinical cases were included in this review. Articles written in languages using alphabets other than Latin were excluded.
    CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of these various studies has enabled us to draw up a list that is intended to be as exhaustive as possible of the causes of splenic infarction. The most frequent are emboligenic heart disease, hematological malignancies, solid neoplasia and certain infections. The descriptions available in the literature were mainly based on isolated clinical cases, not always making it possible to establish a causal link with the disease described, especially as around 20% of reported cases of splenic infarction were asymptomatic and potentially of incidental discovery. Based on the findings of this literature review, we propose a protocol for the etiological assessment of splenic infarcts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,人们重新开始对关于抑郁原因的理解和讨论进行多样化的兴趣,以超越生物医学决定论——生物医学因素是个体抑郁的最终原因。人们越来越重视人们如何阐明抑郁症的原因以纳入非生物医学方面的多样性。此外,尤其是由于药物治疗中出现的局限性,对抑郁症的生物医学理解受到越来越多的质疑.这些转变鼓励社会分析,探索关于抑郁原因的叙述在不同的背景下以及为什么和如何构建和呈现相对的合理性。通过分析日本已发表的被诊断患有抑郁症的人的回忆录,这项研究旨在为有关抑郁症原因的叙述提供新的见解。它说明了回忆录如何在一个采用西方诊断系统的国家中以特征性方式描绘抑郁症及其感知原因,生物医学疗法和其他相关技术。我将证明“倦怠”是日本数据中的主导主题,与西方社会主要的生物医学叙事不同。这种倦怠的叙述将抑郁症描述为由于个人积极适应日本工作文化的结构特征而引起的过度劳累的不幸但不足为奇的结果。我认为原因,而不是原因,通过揭示结构和个体之间的相互作用来阐明倦怠叙事的形成,并最终丰富对抑郁症的理解。本文最后呼吁探索倦怠叙事所暗示的疾病与常态之间的变化关系。我建议进一步的研究可以探讨如何制定和重新制定正常状态和疾病之间的界限,以及在不同国家规范和实践的背景下,通过公共话语和不断变化的诊断模式对什么有用。
    In recent years, there has been renewed interest in diversifying the understanding and discussion about the causes of depression to move beyond biomedical determinism-a view that biomedical factors are the ultimate cause of an individual\'s depression. There is increasing emphasis on diversity in how people seek to articulate the causes of depression to incorporate non-biomedical dimensions. Furthermore, the biomedical understanding of depression has been increasingly questioned due especially to emerging limitations in pharmacotherapy. These shifts encourage social analyses that explore what narratives as to the causes of depression are constructed and presented with relative plausibility in different contexts and why and how. By analysing published memoirs of individuals diagnosed with depression in Japan, this study aims to provide fresh insights into narratives around the causes of depression. It illustrates how memoirs portray depression and its perceived causes in characteristic ways in a nation that adopts Western diagnostic systems, biomedical therapeutics and other relevant technologies. I will show that \'burnout\' is the dominant theme in the Japanese data, diverging from the predominantly biomedical narrative in Western societies. This burnout narrative depicts depression as the somewhat unfortunate but unsurprising result of overwork arising from individual active adaptations to structural features of the Japanese work culture. I argue that reasons, rather than causes, articulate the making of the burnout narrative by revealing the interplay between the structural and individual and ultimately enrich the understanding of depression. The paper concludes with a call for exploring the shifting relationship between illness and normalcy that the burnout narrative implies. I suggest that further studies could explore how the boundaries between normalcy and illness are enacted and re-enacted and to what avail through public discourse and through shifting diagnostic schemata in the context of different national norms and practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    The question of whether a fall directly onto the shoulder can cause a rotator cuff tear has occupied doctors (and courts) for many years. Experts who rely on the medical insurance literature usually reject the causality of the incident. There are no scientific studies on this. The report below describes a typical case in which a fall directly onto the shoulder caused a massive rotator cuff tear.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Frage, ob ein Sturz direkt auf die Schulter eine Rotatorenmanschettenruptur verursachen kann, beschäftigt Ärzte (und Gerichte) seit vielen Jahren. Gutachter, welche sich auf die versicherungsmedizinische Literatur stützen, lehnen die Unfallkausalität in der Regel ab. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen dazu gibt es nicht. Der untenstehende Bericht beschreibt einen typischen Fall, bei dem ein Sturz direkt auf die Schulter eine massive Rotatorenmanschettenruptur verursacht hat.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    不合理的饮食不仅受到动力不足的威胁,而且还受到海船上失业的威胁。海员的胃溃疡等疾病,十二指肠溃疡,胃炎,胰腺炎是不订立或不延长雇佣合同的基础。这类职业病发生和发展的重要原因是船上缺乏考虑航行条件的适当饮食,船舶厨师资格培训不足,以及特定船东资金不足,船员的每日食物津贴。本文揭示了国际和国家规范性文件关于组织适当饮食和餐桌服务的要求,确定海船和河船船员的日常饮食。讨论了对高等海事学校的活跃水手和学员对有组织饮食满意度的调查结果。提出了确保船上口粮平衡的建议。
    The unreasonable diet is threatening not only by development of hypodynamia but also by loosing job on board of sea vessel. Such diseases of seamen as gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, gastritis, pancreatitis are a basis of non-making or non-extending employment contract. The significant causes of occurrence and development of this category of occupational illness are lacking of proper diet on shipboard that considers conditions of voyages, inadequate qualification training of ship cooks, as well as insufficient funding by particular shipowners daily food allowance of crew members. The article reveals requirements of international and national normative documents regarding organization of proper diet and table service, determines daily diet of crew members of sea and river vessels. The results of survey of active sailors and cadets of higher maritime school regarding the satisfaction of organized diet are discussed. The recommendations to ensure balanced rations on board the ship are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    石油蒸气和石油产品对油轮船队船员健康的负面影响是一个大规模的运输问题,因为海员的生命和健康安全被宣布为实施生产活动的基本价值。油品装卸和运输过程中排放的惰性气体,鉴于它们的毒性,吸入中等浓度的有害物质时,不仅会导致急性中毒,还会导致慢性疾病的发展。本文考虑了影响散装石油船队船员的主要专业工业因素,中毒的症状和船员的初步护理,使用这种类型的货物时,个人封面的应用。特别注意在石油产品对海员健康产生负面影响的背景下发展的慢性疾病。提出了预防和及时发现其发展的建议。
    The negative effect of oil vapors and oil products on health of crew of tanker fleet is a large-scale problem of shipping since safety of life and health of seamen is declared as essential value in implementation of production activity. The inert gases emitted during handling and transportation of oil products, in view of their toxicity, may result not only in acute intoxication but also in development of chronic diseases when inhaling harmful substances in moderate concentrations. The article considers main professional industrial factors that affect crew members of bulk-oil fleet, symptomatology of intoxication and initial care of crew members, application of personal cover when working with this type of cargo. The special attention is paid to chronic diseases developing against the background of negative effect of oil products on health of seamen. The recommendations of prevention and timely detection of their development are proposed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究事故原因的信念是,通过寻找原因,事故可以通过消除或控制其原因来预防。因此,传统上被视为导致事故的风险因素只有在有可能通过一种或多种道路安全措施来改变的情况下才能被视为原因。风险因素是指通过实施影响风险因素的一项或多项道路安全措施可以改变其与事故的关系的原因。因此,可以实施的道路安全措施,以改变被确定为导致事故的风险因素,但没有,也是事故的原因。许多传统上被认定为事故危险因素的人为因素,像年龄,性别,驾驶体验,期望或非自愿地注意力不集中不是事故的原因,因为它们不能通过任何现实的道路安全措施来改变。什么不能改变(不可能是不同的)不是一个原因。有可能,在案例研究和统计分析中,确定引发或导致事故的一系列因素何时完成。本来可以实施的道路安全措施清单仅受我们的创造力和想象力的限制,因此永远不会完成。
    The causes of accidents are studied in the belief that by finding causes, accidents can be prevented by removing or controlling their causes. It follows that the risk factors that have traditionally been regarded as contributing to accidents can only be regarded as causes if it is possible to alter them by means of one or more road safety measures. Risk factors are causes if their relationship to accidents can be changed by implementing one or more road safety measures influencing the risk factors. Hence, road safety measures that could have been implemented to change risk factors identified as contributing to an accident, but have not, are also causes of accidents. Many of the human factors that have traditionally been identified as risk factors for accidents, like age, gender, driving experience, expectations or involuntary inattention are not causes of accidents, because they cannot be changed by means of any realistic road safety measure. What cannot be changed (could not have been different) is not a cause. It is possible, both in case studies and in statistical analyses, to determine when a set of factors precipitating or contributing to accidents is complete. A list of road safety measures that could have been implemented is only limited by our creativity and imagination and will therefore never be complete.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查患病率,特点,原因,后果,以及围手术期护士破坏性行为的预测因素和反应。
    方法:使用网络问卷平台进行横断面设计。
    方法:2020年3月在线招募围手术期护士。收集了过去6个月对护士的破坏性行为数据以及护士的社会人口统计学和环境因素。
    结果:护士(N=496)对调查做出了有效的回应。总的来说,82.1%的参与者经历了破坏性行为。繁重的工作量分配和言语攻击是最常见的行为,外科医生是主要的肇事者。犯罪者的内心问题是最常见的原因。积极战略是与会者采用的最常见战略。Further,80.8%的参与者讲述了他们的负面经历,超过一半的受访者(59.9%)与护理同事交谈。近一半的受访者(45.9%)没有报告破坏性行为。53.1%的参与者报告了负面情绪作为立竿见影的效果,最常见的长期影响是对工作的热情下降。中年,工作岗位,实践环境,和系统帮助是经历破坏性行为的风险因素。
    结论:围手术期护士的破坏性行为发生率很高,其后果不容忽视。医疗机构应紧急实施干预策略,以减少对护士的干扰行为。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence, characteristics, causes, consequences, and predictors of and responses to disruptive behavior toward nurses in the perioperative arena.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional design using a network questionnaire platform.
    METHODS: Nurses in the perioperative arena were recruited online in March 2020. Data on disruptive behavior toward nurses in the past 6 months and nurses\' sociodemographic and environmental factors were collected.
    RESULTS: Nurses (N = 496) responded validly to the survey. In total, 82.1% of participants experienced disruptive behavior. Assignment of overwhelming workloads and verbal aggression were the most common behaviors, and surgeons were the major perpetrators. Perpetrators\' intrapersonal issues were the most commonly perceived causes. A positive strategy was the most common strategy adopted by participants. Further, 80.8% of participants recounted their negative experiences, and more than half of respondents (59.9%) talked with their nursing colleagues. Nearly half of respondents (45.9%) did not report disruptive behavior. Negative emotions as an immediate effect were reported by 53.1% of the participants, and the most common long-term impact was decreased passion for work. Middle age, job position, practice environment, and system help were risk factors for experiencing disruptive behavior.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of disruptive behavior toward nurses in the perioperative arena is high, and its ramifications should not be ignored. Health care institutions should urgently implement intervention strategies to reduce disruptive behavior toward nurses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号