This study introduces a novel approach to transport modelling by integrating experimentally derived causal priors into neural networks. We illustrate this paradigm using a case study of metformin, a ubiquitous pharmaceutical emerging pollutant, and its transport behaviour in sandy media. Specifically, data from metformin\'s sandy column transport experiment was used to estimate unobservable parameters through a physics-based model Hydrus-1D, followed by a data augmentation to produce a more comprehensive dataset. A causal graph incorporating key variables was constructed, aiding in identifying impactful variables and estimating their causal dynamics or \"causal prior.\" The causal priors extracted from the augmented dataset included underexplored system parameters such as the type-1 sorption fraction F, first-order reaction rate coefficient α, and transport system scale. Their moderate impact on the transport process has been quantitatively evaluated (normalized causal effect 0.0423, -0.1447 and -0.0351, respectively) with adequate confounders considered for the first time. The prior was later embedded into multilayer neural networks via two methods: causal weight initialization and causal prior regularization. Based on the results from AutoML hyperparameter tuning experiments, using two embedding methods simultaneously emerged as a more advantageous practice since our proposed causal weight initialization technique can enhance model stability, particularly when used in conjunction with causal prior regularization. amongst those experiments utilizing both techniques, the R-squared values peaked at 0.881. This study demonstrates a balanced approach between expert knowledge and data-driven methods, providing enhanced interpretability in black-box models such as neural networks for environmental modelling.

In this update, we discuss recent US FDA guidance offering more specific guidelines on appropriate study design and analysis to support causal inference for non-interventional studies and the launch of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA) public electronic catalogues. We also highlight an article recommending assessing data quality and suitability prior to protocol finalization and a Journal of the American Medical Association-endorsed framework for using causal language when publishing real-world evidence studies. Finally, we explore the potential of large language models to automate the development of health economic models.

UNASSIGNED: Potential uncertainties and overtreatment exist in adjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.
UNASSIGNED: This study aims to explore the performance of deep learning (DL) models in personalized chemotherapy selection and quantify the impact of baseline characteristics on treatment efficacy.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who received treatment recommended by models were compared to those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. To mitigate bias, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed. A mixed-effect multivariate linear regression was employed to visualize the influence of certain baseline features of patients on chemotherapy selection.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 10,070 female TNBC patients met the inclusion criteria. Treatment according to Self-Normalizing Balanced (SNB) individual treatment effect for survival data model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.32-8.60; IPTW-adjusted risk difference: 12.90, 95% CI, 6.99-19.01; IPTW-adjusted the difference in restricted mean survival time: 5.54, 95% CI, 1.36-8.61), which surpassed other models and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients not recommended to receive this treatment. SNB predicted older patients with larger tumors and more positive lymph nodes are the optimal candidates for chemotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that the SNB model may identify patients with TNBC who could benefit from chemotherapy. This novel analytical approach may provide debiased individual survival information and treatment recommendations. Further research is required to validate these models in clinical settings with more features and outcome measurements.

Unravelling the impact of the sex of the anaesthesia provider on the outcomes of patients requires careful statistical analysis and the validity of many assumptions. A recent study in the British Journal of Anaesthesia investigates the effect of anaesthesia provider sex on patient outcomes, using data from two academic healthcare networks in the USA. The authors show that female provider sex was associated with a lower risk of intraoperative complications. They also show that there was no meaningful difference between male and female providers with respect to postoperative outcomes. There have been several recent studies considering the effect of healthcare provider sex on outcomes. We will discuss the interpretation of these results and the validity of the underlying assumptions.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of participation in self-help groups on treatment completion among individuals undergoing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment. Given the suboptimal adherence and retention rates for MOUD, this research seeks to examine the association between treatment completion and patient-level factors. Specifically, we evaluated the causal relationship between self-help group participation and treatment completion for patients undergoing MOUD.
METHODS: We used the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration\'s (SAMHSA) Treatment Episode Data Set: Discharges (TEDS-D) from 2015 to 2019. The data are filtered by the patient\'s opioid use history, demographics, treatment modality, and other relevant information. In this observational study, machine learning models (Lasso Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forest, and XGBoost) were developed to predict treatment completion. Outcome Adaptive Elastic Net (OAENet) was used to select confounders and outcome predictors, and the robust McNemars test was used to evaluate the causal relationship between self-help group participation and MOUD treatment completion.
RESULTS: The machine-learning models showed a strong association between participation in self-help groups and treatment completion. Our causal analysis demonstrated an average treatment effect on treated (ATT) of 0.260 and a p-value < 0.0001 for the robust McNemars test.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the importance of participation in self-help groups for MOUD treatment recipients. We found that participation in MOUD along with self-help groups caused higher chances of treatment completion than MOUD alone. This suggests that policymakers should consider further integrating self-help groups into the treatment for OUD to improve the adherence and completion rate.

Psychologists leverage longitudinal designs to examine the causal effects of a focal predictor (i.e., treatment or exposure) over time. But causal inference of naturally observed time-varying treatments is complicated by treatment-dependent confounding in which earlier treatments affect confounders of later treatments. In this tutorial article, we introduce psychologists to an established solution to this problem from the causal inference literature: the parametric g-computation formula. We explain why the g-formula is effective at handling treatment-dependent confounding. We demonstrate that the parametric g-formula is conceptually intuitive, easy to implement, and well-suited for psychological research. We first clarify that the parametric g-formula essentially utilizes a series of statistical models to estimate the joint distribution of all post-treatment variables. These statistical models can be readily specified as standard multiple linear regression functions. We leverage this insight to implement the parametric g-formula using lavaan, a widely adopted R package for structural equation modeling. Moreover, we describe how the parametric g-formula may be used to estimate a marginal structural model whose causal parameters parsimoniously encode time-varying treatment effects. We hope this accessible introduction to the parametric g-formula will equip psychologists with an analytic tool to address their causal inquiries using longitudinal data.

BACKGROUND: Perceived discrimination in health care settings can have adverse consequences on mental health in minority groups. However, the association between perceived discrimination and mental health is prone to unmeasured confounding. The study aims to quantitatively evaluate the influence of unmeasured confounding in this association, using g-estimation.
METHODS: In a predominantly African American cohort, we applied g-estimation to estimate the association between perceived discrimination and mental health, adjusted and unadjusted for measured confounders. Mental health was measured using clinical diagnoses of anxiety, depression and bipolar disorder. Perceived discrimination was measured as the number of patient-reported discrimination events in health care settings. Measured confounders included demographic, socioeconomic, residential and health characteristics. The influence of confounding was denoted as α1 from g-estimation. We compared α1 for measured and unmeasured confounding.
RESULTS: Strong associations between perceived discrimination in health care settings and mental health outcomes were observed. For anxiety, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) unadjusted and adjusted for measured confounders were 1.30 (1.21, 1.39) and 1.26 (1.17, 1.36), respectively. The α1 for measured confounding was -0.066. Unmeasured confounding with α1=0.200, which was over three times that of measured confounding, corresponds to an odds ratio of 1.12 (1.01, 1.24). Similar results were observed for other mental health outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with measured confounding, unmeasured that was three times measured confounding was not enough to explain away the association between perceived discrimination and mental health, suggesting that this association is robust to unmeasured confounding. This study provides a novel framework to quantitatively evaluate unmeasured confounding.

When studying the impact of policy interventions or natural experiments on air pollution, such as new environmental policies and opening or closing an industrial facility, careful statistical analysis is needed to separate causal changes from other confounding factors. Using COVID-19 lockdowns as a case-study, we present a comprehensive framework for estimating and validating causal changes from such perturbations. We propose using flexible machine learning-based comparative interrupted time series (CITS) models for estimating such a causal effect. We outline the assumptions required to identify causal effects, showing that many common methods rely on strong assumptions that are relaxed by machine learning models. For empirical validation, we also propose a simple diagnostic criterion, guarding against false effects in baseline years when there was no intervention. The framework is applied to study the impact of COVID-19 lockdowns on NO2 in the eastern US. The machine learning approaches guard against false effects better than common methods and suggest decreases in NO2 in Boston, New York City, Baltimore, and Washington D.C. The study showcases the importance of our validation framework in selecting a suitable method and the utility of a machine learning based CITS model for studying causal changes in air pollution time series.

Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics ( \"Z-drugs\") are prescribed for insomnia, but might increase risk of motor vehicle crash (MVC) among older adults through prolonged drowsiness and delayed reaction times. We estimated the effect of initiating Z-drug treatment on the 12-week risk of MVC in a sequential target trial emulation. After linking New Jersey driver licensing and police-reported MVC data to Medicare claims, we emulated a new target trial each week (July 1, 2007 - October 7, 2017) in which Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries were classified as Z-drug-treated or untreated at baseline and followed for an MVC. We used inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighted pooled logistic regression models to estimate risk ratios (RR) and risk differences with 95% bootstrap confidence limits (CLs). There were 257,554 person-trials, of which 103,371 were Z-drug-treated and 154,183 untreated, giving rise to 976 and 1,249 MVCs, respectively. The intention-to-treat RR was 1.06 (95%CLs 0.95, 1.16). For the per-protocol estimand, there were 800 MVCs and 1,241 MVCs among treated and untreated person-trials, respectively, suggesting a reduced MVC risk (RR 0.83 [95%CLs 0.74, 0.92]) with sustained Z-drug treatment. Z-drugs should be prescribed to older patients judiciously but not withheld entirely over concerns about MVC risk.