biliary tract neoplasms

胆道肿瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)诊断的临床实践指南,胆道癌(BTC)患者的治疗和随访,根据既定的标准方法,2022年底出版,于2023年12月改编,为亚洲BTC患者的管理制定泛亚适应(PAGA)ESMO共识指南。本手稿中提出的适应指南代表了代表中国肿瘤学会(CSCO)的亚洲专家小组在治疗BTC患者方面达成的共识意见。印度尼西亚(ISHMO),印度(ISMPO),日本(JSMO),韩国(KSMO),马来西亚(MOS),菲律宾(PSMO)新加坡(SSO),台湾(TOS)和泰国(TSCO),由ESMO和台湾肿瘤学会(TOS)协调。投票基于科学证据,独立于当前的治疗实践,亚洲不同地区的药物准入限制和报销决定。手稿中分别讨论了亚洲不同地区的药物获取和报销。目的是为亚洲不同国家和地区的BTC患者管理的优化和协调提供指导。借鉴西方和亚洲试验提供的证据,同时尊重筛选实践和分子谱分析的差异,以及演讲的年龄和阶段。提请注意药物批准和报销策略的差异,在不同国家之间。
    The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肌肉减少症与恶性肿瘤患者的不良预后相关。然而,其对接受手术切除的胆道癌(BTC)患者结局的影响尚不清楚,需要进一步审查.本研究旨在总结有关此问题的现有证据。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆在2024年3月10日之前进行符合条件的研究。我们提取了总生存期(OS)的数据,无复发生存率(RFS),以及纳入研究的术后主要并发症作为感兴趣的结局。在数据综合和分析之后,我们评估了异质性并进行了亚组分析.此外,评估了发表偏倚的可能性.
    结果:最终检索了26项研究,涉及4292名BTC患者。结果表明,BTC患者术后肌肉减少与OS降低显著相关(校正后HR:2.03,95%CI:1.65-2.48,P<0.001,I2=57.4%)。此外,肌肉减少症也可能与较差的RFS(调整后的HR:2.15,95%CI:1.79-2.59,P<0.001,I2=0%)和术后主要并发症增加(OR:1.22,95%CI1.02-1.47,P=0.033,I2=29.2%)有关。值得注意的是,通过漏斗图和Egger检验未检测到显著的发表偏倚.
    结论:肌肉减少症与手术后BTC患者的OS较差相关。此外,它可以作为RFS较差和术后主要并发症增加的预后指标.需要进一步的研究来标准化现有的定义并验证这些发现。
    OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with malignant tumors. However, its impact on the outcomes of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) undergoing surgical resection remains unclear and warrants further review. This study aims to summarize the available evidence on this issue.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies up to March 10, 2024. We extracted data on overall survival (OS), recurrence free survival (RFS), and postoperative major complications from the included studies as the outcomes of interest. Following data synthesis and analysis, we assessed the heterogeneity and performed subgroup analyses. Additionally, the potential for publication bias was evaluated.
    RESULTS: A total of 26 studies involving 4292 BTC patients were ultimately retrieved. The findings indicated that sarcopenia was significantly associated with reduced OS in BTC patients after surgery (adjusted HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.65-2.48, P < 0.001, I2 = 57.4%). Moreover, sarcopenia may also be linked to poorer RFS (adjusted HR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.79-2.59, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%) and increased postoperative major complications (OR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.47, P = 0.033, I2 = 29.2%) as well. Notably, no significant publication bias was detected through funnel plots and Egger\'s tests.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is associated with poorer OS in BTC patients following surgery. Additionally, it may serve as a prognostic indicator for poorer RFS and increased postoperative major complications. Further studies are warrant to standardize existing definitions and validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆道癌(BTC)是一类异质性高恶性的肿瘤,预后不良,和有限的治疗选择。
    目的:探讨nab-紫杉醇联合卡培他滨一线治疗晚期和转移性BTC的疗效和安全性。
    方法:这个开放标签,非随机化,双中心,II期临床试验招募了2019年4月至2022年6月期间在北京肿瘤医院和中国医科大学附属第一医院进行的未接受过全身治疗的不可切除或转移性BTC患者.符合条件的患者接受nab-紫杉醇(150mg/m2,第1天)和卡培他滨(2000mg/m2,每天两次,第1-7天)在14天的周期中,直到出现无法耐受的毒性或疾病进展。主要结果是客观反应率(ORR)。次要结果包括疾病控制率(DCR),总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),和安全。
    结果:共有44名患者成功完成试验,年龄中位数为64.00岁(四分位数间距,35.00-76.00),女性26人(59.09%)。由于肿瘤出血的过早死亡,一名患者的肿瘤反应评估受到阻碍。在接受至少一次影像学评估的其余43名患者中,ORR为23.26%[95%置信区间(CI):11.80%-38.60%],DCR为69.77%(95CI:53.90%-82.80%)。中位OS为14.1个月(95CI:8.3-19.9),中位PFS为4.4个月(95CI:2.5-6.3)。共有41例患者(93.18%)经历了至少一次不良事件(AE)。10例患者(22.73%)出现≥3级AE,任何级别中最常见的不良事件是脱发(79.50%),白细胞减少症(54.55%),中性粒细胞减少症(52.27%),肝功能异常(40.91%),无治疗相关死亡记录.
    结论:Nab-紫杉醇联合卡培他滨可能是治疗晚期或转移性BTC患者的有效且安全的一线治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with high malignancy, poor prognosis, and limited treatment options.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced and metastatic BTCs.
    METHODS: This open-label, non-randomized, double-center, phase II clinical trial recruited systemic therapy-naive patients with unresectable or metastatic BTCs between April 2019 and June 2022 at Beijing Cancer Hospital and the First Hospital of China Medical University. Eligible patients were administered nab-paclitaxel (150 mg/m2, day 1) and capecitabine (2000 mg/m2, twice daily, days 1-7) in 14-day cycles until experiencing intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes included the disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.
    RESULTS: A total of 44 patients successfully completed the trial, with a median age of 64.00 years (interquartile range, 35.00-76.00), and 26 (59.09%) were females. Tumor response assessment was impeded for one patient due to premature demise from tumor hemorrhage. Among the remaining 43 patients undergoing at least one imaging assessment, the ORR was 23.26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 11.80%-38.60%], and the DCR was 69.77% (95%CI: 53.90%-82.80%). The median OS was 14.1 months (95%CI: 8.3-19.9), and the median PFS was 4.4 months (95%CI: 2.5-6.3). A total of 41 patients (93.18%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), with 10 patients (22.73%) encountering grade ≥ 3 AEs, and the most frequent AEs of any grade were alopecia (79.50%), leukopenia (54.55%), neutropenia (52.27%), and liver dysfunction (40.91%), and no treatment-related deaths were documented.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nab-paclitaxel plus capecitabine may be an effective and safe first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic BTCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    最近引入的WHO胰腺胆管肿瘤细胞学分类旨在改善这些肿瘤的诊断和管理。本文简要介绍了诊断方法。然后重点对以前的Papanicolaou分类和新的WHO分类进行了详细的比较,并描述了引入WHO分类所带来的变化。在论文的最后一部分,我们从我们的实践中提供了有趣的案例,说明了细胞学评估可能的诊断缺陷。
    The recent introduction of the WHO cytology classification of pancreatobiliary tumours aimed to improve the diagnosis and management of these tumours. The present paper briefly describes the methods of diagnosis. Emphasis is then put on a detailed comparison of the previous Papanicolaou classification and the new WHO classification and description of the changes brought about by the introduction of the WHO classification. In the last part of the paper, we present interesting cases from our practice illustrating possible diagnostic pitfalls of cytological evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    胰胆管肿瘤病变的术前细胞病理学检查是一种敏感而特异的方法,在这些疾病的诊断和临床治疗中是不可替代的。病理学家应尽一切努力提供尽可能精确的诊断,并尽量减少“非典型”结果的发生率,造成管理困境。通过明智地使用辅助研究,可以显着提高细胞病理学的诊断准确性。包括免疫组织化学和分子遗传学。下一代测序(NGS)是胰胆管细胞病理学诊断库的最新补充。NGS不仅是一个非常强大的诊断工具,但也携带重要的预后和治疗信息。
    Preoperative cytopathology of pancreatobiliary neoplastic lesions is a sensitive and specific method and is irreplaceable in the diagnosis and clinical management of these diseases. Pathologists should make every attempt to provide diagnosis as precise as possible and minimize the rate of \"atypical\" results, which create management dilemmas. The diagnostic accuracy of cytopathology can be significantly improved by judicious use of ancillary studies, including immunohistochemistry and molecular genetics. Next generation sequencing (NGS) is the latest addition to pancreatobiliary cytopathology diagnostic arsenal. NGS is not only a very robust diagnostic tool, but also carries significant prognostic and therapeutic information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆道癌(BTC)由一组靠近但在解剖学上不同的肝和肝周肿瘤组成,包括胆囊癌(GBC),胆管癌(肝外和肝内[ICC]),和Vater壶腹癌(AVC)。大多数流行病学研究集中在一种或多种解剖亚型,或不区分BTC与肝细胞癌或其他原发性肝癌。这里,我们提供了BTC全球发病率和死亡率的描述性更新,整体和解剖亚型。
    年龄标准化比率(每100,000人年)来自国际癌症研究机构,五大洲的癌症发病率第十一卷(2008-2012年;22个国家),和世界卫生组织死亡率数据库(2006-2016年;38个国家)。
    BTC发病率因国家而异,智利最高(14.35),越南最低(1.25)。BTC的死亡率最高的是大韩民国(11.64),最低的是摩尔多瓦共和国(1.65)。34个国家中有24个国家的BTC死亡率随时间增加。在所有国家中,年龄≥75岁的患者的死亡率比总体BTC高5-10倍。在大多数国家,GBC的发病率最高,国际刑事法院的死亡率最高,而两者的AVC最低。女性比男性更频繁地死于GBC。对于ICC,肝外胆管癌,和AVC,男性倾向于更高的发病率和死亡率。
    此处报道的发病率和死亡率趋势增加表明需要改进对所有BTC亚型的预防和治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) consists of a group of hepatic and perihepatic tumors that are in close proximity but are anatomically different, including gallbladder cancer (GBC), cholangiocarcinoma (extrahepatic and intrahepatic [ICC]), and ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC). Most epidemiologic research has focused on 1 or more anatomic subtypes, or does not differentiate BTC from hepatocellular carcinoma or other primary liver cancers. Here, we provide a descriptive update on global incidence and mortality rates for BTC, overall and by anatomic subtypes.
    UNASSIGNED: Age-standardized rates (per 100,000 person-years) were derived from the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Volume XI (2008-2012; 22 countries), and the World Health Organization Mortality Database (2006-2016; 38 countries).
    UNASSIGNED: BTC incidence varied by country, with the highest in Chile (14.35) and the lowest in Vietnam (1.25). Mortality rates for BTC were highest for the Republic of Korea (11.64) and lowest for the Republic of Moldova (1.65). BTC mortality rates increased over time in 24 of 34 countries. Patients aged ≥75 years had 5-10 times higher mortality rates than the overall BTC rate in all countries. In most countries, incidence rates were highest for GBC, and mortality rates highest for ICC, while both were lowest for AVC. Females had and died from GBC more frequently than males. For ICC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and AVC, males trended toward higher incidence and mortality rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The increasing incidence and mortality trends reported here indicate a need for improved prevention and treatment for all BTC subtypes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过可用的血清肿瘤标志物诊断胆胰癌,成像,和组织病理学组织标本检查仍然是一个挑战。使用AmpliSeq™HD技术进行离子激流下一代测序,分析了来自10名胆胰疾病患者和8名对照受试者的配对的促胰液(DF)和血浆对的循环无细胞DNA,以评估具有DF的液体活检在胆胰癌中的潜力。DF来源的cfDNA浓度中位数高于血浆来源的样品。总共检测到13种变体:11vs.1只用于DF,相对于等离子体源,1在两种体液之间共享。根据四级系统,10临床一级-二级(76.9%),1个三级(7.7%),并鉴定了2个IV级(15.4%)变异。值得注意的是,这11个I-III级变异仅在来自5例胆胰癌患者的DF来源的cfDNA中发现,并在七个基因中检测到(KRAS,TP53,BRAF,CDKN2A,RNF43,GNAS,和PIK3CA);82%的I-III级变体具有低丰度,VAF<6%。DF的突变分析似乎是鉴定胆胰道恶性肿瘤中与癌症相关的改变的可靠且有前途的工具。
    Diagnosis of biliopancreatic cancers by the available serum tumor markers, imaging, and histopathological tissue specimen examination remains a challenge. Circulating cell-free DNA derived from matched pairs of secretin-stimulated duodenal fluid (DF) and plasma from 10 patients with biliopancreatic diseases and 8 control subjects was analyzed using AmpliSeq™ HD technology for Ion Torrent Next-Generation Sequencing to evaluate the potential of liquid biopsy with DF in biliopancreatic cancers. The median cfDNA concentration was greater in DF-derived than in plasma-derived samples. A total of 13 variants were detected: 11 vs. 1 were exclusive for DF relative to the plasma source, and 1 was shared between the two body fluids. According to the four-tier systems, 10 clinical tier-I-II (76.9%), 1 tier-III (7.7%), and 2 tier-IV (15.4%) variants were identified. Notably, the 11 tier-I-III variants were exclusively found in DF-derived cfDNA from five patients with biliopancreatic cancers, and were detected in seven genes (KRAS, TP53, BRAF, CDKN2A, RNF43, GNAS, and PIK3CA); 82% of the tier-I-III variants had a low abundance, with a VAF < 6%. The mutational profiling of DF seems to be a reliable and promising tool for identifying cancer-associated alterations in malignant cancers of the biliopancreatic tract.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:早发性胆道癌(eoBTC)是快速增长的早发性癌症子集,然而对它的生物学知之甚少。我们试图使用真实世界的多组学数据集确定eoBTC与平均起效BTC(aoBTC)的新分子特征。
    方法:该研究包括BTC患者,其肿瘤在CarisLifeSciences进行了分子分析,并按年龄分类(eoBTC<50岁,aoBTC≥50年)。针对多次测试调整P值,并且认为在Q<0.05(分子比较)或Q<0.25(基因集富集分析[GSEA])时是显著的。保险索赔数据用于生存分析。
    结果:该研究包括5,587例BTC患者(453eoBTC,中位年龄=44岁和5,134aoBTC,中位年龄=68岁)。FGFR2融合(eoBTC中的15.7%vaoBTC中的5.9%)和NIPBL融合(1.1%v0%)在eoBTC中明显更普遍(均Q<0.001)。干扰素γ-IFG评分(倍数变化[FC],1.1;Q=0.01)和T细胞炎症评分(FC,17.3;Q=0.03)在aoBTC中明显更高。在GSEA,血管生成在eoBTC中富集(归一化富集评分[NES]=1.51;Q=0.16),而IFG(NES=-1.58;Q=0.06)和炎症反应(NES=-1.46;Q=0.18)富含aobTC。中位总生存期(OS)为16.5(eoBTC)和13.3个月(aoBTC),危险比=0.86,P=.004。eoBTCFGFR2融合(无融合)的中位OS为21.7和15.0个月(P=0.47),aoBTC为18.6和12.2个月(P<.001)。
    结论:我们发现了重要的差异,包括eoBTC中FGFR2融合的患病率较高,以及免疫治疗相关标志物的变异。eoBTC更好的结果受FGFR2融合状态的影响。我们的发现强调了确保获得下一代测序测试的必要性,包括迅速识别可采取行动的目标。
    OBJECTIVE: Early-onset biliary tract cancer (eoBTC) is among the fast-growing subset of early-onset cancers, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to identify novel molecular characteristics of eoBTC in relation to average-onset BTC (aoBTC) using a real-world multiomics data set.
    METHODS: The study comprised patients with BTC whose tumors underwent molecular analyses at Caris Life Sciences and were categorized by age (<50 years for eoBTC, ≥50 years for aoBTC). P values were adjusted for multiple testing and considered significant at Q < 0.05 (molecular comparisons) or Q < 0.25 (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis [GSEA]). Insurance claims data were used for survival analysis.
    RESULTS: The study included 5,587 patients with BTC (453 eoBTC, median age = 44 years and 5,134 aoBTC, median age = 68 years). FGFR2 fusion (15.7% in eoBTC v 5.9% in aoBTC) and NIPBL fusion (1.1% v 0%) were significantly more prevalent in eoBTC (both Q < 0.001). The interferon gamma-IFG score (fold change [FC], 1.1; Q = 0.01) and T-cell inflammation score (FC, 17.3; Q = 0.03) were significantly higher in aoBTC. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoBTC (normalized enrichment score [NES] = 1.51; Q = 0.16), whereas IFG (NES = -1.58; Q = 0.06) and inflammatory response (NES = -1.46; Q = 0.18) were enriched in aoBTC. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (eoBTC) versus 13.3 months (aoBTC), hazard ratio = 0.86, P = .004. The median OS by FGFR2 fusion (with fusion v without) was 21.7 versus 15.0 months (P = .47) for eoBTC and 18.6 versus 12.2 months (P < .001) for aoBTC.
    CONCLUSIONS: We identified crucial differences including higher prevalence of FGFR2 fusions in eoBTC and variations in immunotherapy-related markers. Better outcomes in eoBTC were affected by the FGFR2 fusion status. Our findings underscore the need for ensuring access to next-generation sequencing testing, including prompt identification of actionable targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是调查骨量减少,骨减少症,肝胆胰癌(HBPC)患者的术后结局。
    三个在线数据库,包括Embase,PubMed,还有Cochrane图书馆,彻底搜索了描述骨量减少之间关系的文献,骨减少症,从每个数据库开始到2023年9月29日,HBPC患者的手术治疗结果。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估研究质量。
    该分析包括总共16篇文章和2,599名个体的合并患者队列。结果表明,与没有骨量减少的患者相比,HBPC患者的OS(HR:2.27,95%CI:1.70-3.03,p<0.001)和RFS(HR:1.96,95%CI:1.42-2.71,p<0.001)明显较差。亚组分析表明,这些发现在单变量和多变量分析中是一致的,以及肝细胞癌,胆道癌,还有胰腺癌.与没有骨量减少的患者相比,骨量减少的患者发生术后主要并发症的风险明显更高(OR:1.66,95%CI:1.19-2.33,p<0.001)。此外,我们还发现,与没有骨肉瘤减少症的患者相比,HBPC患者中存在骨肉瘤减少症与较差的OS(HR:3.31,95%CI:2.00-5.48,p<0.001)和PFS(HR:2.50,95%CI:1.62-3.84,p<0.001)显著相关.
    术前骨量减少和骨量减少可预测术后HBPC的OS和RFS较差。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to investigate potential associations between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and postoperative outcomes in patients with hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer (HBPC).
    UNASSIGNED: Three online databases, including Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were thoroughly searched for literature describing the relationship between osteopenia, osteosarcopenia, and outcomes of surgical treatment of HBPC patients from the start of each database to September 29, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to rate the quality of the studies.
    UNASSIGNED: This analysis included a total of 16 articles with a combined patient cohort of 2,599 individuals. The results demonstrated that HBPC patients with osteopenia had significantly inferior OS (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.70-3.03, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.42-2.71, p < 0.001) compared to those without osteopenia. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that these findings were consistent across univariate and multivariate analyses, as well as hepatocellular carcinoma, biliary tract cancer, and pancreatic cancer. The risk of postoperative major complications was significantly higher in patients with osteopenia compared to those without osteopenia (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.19-2.33, p < 0.001). Besides, we also found that the presence of osteosarcopenia in HBPC patients was significantly related to poorer OS (HR: 3.31, 95% CI: 2.00-5.48, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.62-3.84, p < 0.001) in comparison to those without osteosarcopenia.
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative osteopenia and osteosarcopenia can predict poorer OS and RFS with HBPC after surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号