behavior change techniques

行为改变技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症诊断后的身体活动参与与生存率呈正相关,降低疾病复发的风险,并降低癌症特异性和全因死亡率。然而,在诊断为乳腺癌或前列腺癌并接受治疗的个体中,体力活动参与率较低.
    目的:本研究的目的是描述开发电子循环干预的系统过程,旨在增加前列腺癌或乳腺癌患者的身体活动,并概述要实施的关键组成部分。
    方法:医学研究委员会关于开发复杂干预措施的指南和行为改变轮被用来指导干预措施的开发。从文献中收集信息,并通过与最终用户的讨论来了解影响电子循环的因素。这些因素被映射到理论域框架上,以确定潜在的作用机制。从理论和证据中选择行为改变技术来制定干预内容。有兴趣的人士,包括自行车教练,最终用户,和行为改变专家,审查并完善了干预措施。
    结果:电子循环参与的预期障碍和促进因素被映射到理论域框架的14个域中的11个。在社区中训练有素的自行车教练提供的4个一对一的电子自行车课程中,总共选择了23种行为改变技术来针对这些领域。为自行车教练提供了3小时的课堂培训课程,以提供干预措施,并提供了3小时的实践课程和反馈。这项工作的结果是一种理论和循证干预措施,旨在促进接受乳腺癌或前列腺癌治疗的个体的电子循环行为。目前正在实施和评估。
    结论:透明的干预措施制定和内容报告对于全面检查干预措施的实施非常重要。目前正在一项试点随机对照试验中评估该干预方案的实施情况。如果发现干预是有效的,内容和交付是可以接受的,这一干预措施将为在其他癌症幸存者中开展电子循环干预措施奠定基础.
    背景:ISRCTN注册表ISRCTN39112034https://www。isrctn.com/ISRCTN39112034;和IRSCTN注册表ISRCTN42852156;https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42852156.
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity engagement following a cancer diagnosis is positively associated with survival, reduced risk of disease recurrence, and reduced cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. However, rates of physical activity engagement are low among individuals diagnosed with and being treated for breast cancer or prostate cancer.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the systematic process of developing an e-cycling intervention aimed at increasing physical activity among individuals living with prostate cancer or breast cancer and outline the key components to be implemented.
    METHODS: The Medical Research Council guidance for developing complex interventions and the Behaviour Change Wheel were used to guide intervention development. Information was gathered from the literature and through discussions with end users to understand factors influencing e-cycling. These factors were mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify potential mechanisms of action. Behavior change techniques were selected from theory and evidence to develop intervention content. Interested parties, including cycling instructors, end users, and behavior change experts, reviewed and refined the intervention.
    RESULTS: Anticipated barriers and facilitators to e-cycling engagement were mapped onto 11 of the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. A total of 23 behavior change techniques were selected to target these domains over 4 one-to-one e-cycling sessions delivered by trained cycling instructors in the community. Cycling instructors were provided a 3-hour classroom training session on delivering the intervention and a 3-hour practical session with feedback. The outcome of this work is a theory and evidence-informed intervention aimed at promoting e-cycling behavior among individuals being treated for breast cancer or prostate cancer, which is currently being implemented and evaluated.
    CONCLUSIONS: Transparent intervention development and reporting of content is important for comprehensively examining intervention implementation. The implementation of this intervention package is currently being evaluated in a pilot randomized controlled trial. If the intervention is found to be effective and the content and delivery are acceptable, this intervention will form a basis for the development of e-cycling interventions in other survivors of cancer.
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN39112034 https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39112034; and IRSCTN Registry ISRCTN42852156; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN42852156.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管体育活动对健康有益,生活在长期护理设施中的许多老年人导致久坐不动的生活方式,不符合最低限度的体育锻炼建议。确定身体活动干预中使用的行为改变技术(BCT)可以帮助我们了解实现行为改变的潜在机制。本系统评价的目的是确定和评估老年居民身体活动干预中的BCT。检索了6个电子数据库,保留了15个符合条件的研究。确定了9个与老年居民体育活动促进相关的有希望的BCT:可靠的来源,社会支持(未指明),目标设定(结果),目标设定(行为),行为的示范,关于如何执行行为的指令,对行为的自我监控,对行为结果的自我监控,并将对象添加到环境中。鼓励未来的研究选择和定制这些BCT的具体需求和目标人群的偏好。
    Despite the health benefits of physical activity, many older adults living in long-term care facilities lead sedentary lifestyles and do not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Determining the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in physical activity interventions can help us understand the underlying mechanisms by which behavioral change is achieved. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate BCTs in physical activity interventions for the elderly residents. Six electronic databases were searched and 15 eligible studies were retained. Nine promising BCTs associated with physical activity promotion among elderly residents were identified: credible source, social support (unspecified), goal setting (outcome), goal setting (behavior), demonstration of the behavior, instruction on how to perform a behavior, self-monitoring of behavior, self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behavior, and adding objects to the environment. Future research is encouraged to select and tailor these BCTs to the specific needs and preferences of the target population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会恢复资本(SRC)是社会资源的组合,可用于通过朋友启动和维持成瘾恢复,家庭,和同龄人。广义上,了解一个人的SRC可以让我们了解一个人在哪里对恢复有社会支持,以及他们的恢复过程中可能存在社会障碍。SRC通常是许多人康复之旅的重要组成部分,然而,我们对如何在研究和实践中最好地使用这一概念的理解仍然不足。提高对社会复苏资本的作用以及衡量和增加社会复苏资本的战略的认识,我们提出了一个路线图,包括五个方面的研究议程:(1)完善社会恢复资本的测量;(2)实证模拟社会恢复资本的复杂性;(3)将人格科学与社会恢复资本研究相结合;(4)优化社会恢复资本的基于证据的行为改变技术;(5)在检查或应用社会恢复资本时纳入一个交叉框架。总的来说,这项五方面的研究议程旨在提高SRC研究的临床效用,以最大限度地提高SRC对患者康复的影响。
    Social recovery capital (SRC) is the combination of social resources that can be used to initiate and sustain addiction recovery through friends, family, and peers. Broadly, understanding one\'s SRC allows us to get a sense of where one has social support for recovery and where there may be social barriers to their recovery process. SRC is often a vital component of many people\'s recovery journey, yet our understanding of how best to use this concept in research and practice remains underdeveloped. To improve understanding of the role of social recovery capital and strategies to measure and increase it, we present a roadmap involving a five-pronged research agenda to: (1) Refine the measurement of social recovery capital; (2) Model the complexity of social recovery capital empirically; (3) Integrate personality science with social recovery capital research; (4) Optimize evidence-based behavior change techniques of social recovery capital; and (5) Incorporate an intersectional framework when examining or applying social recovery capital. Overall, this five-pronged research agenda seeks to enhance the clinical utility of SRC research to maximize the impact of SRC on one\'s recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球,身体不活动(PIA)和久坐行为(SB)被认为是阻碍实现联合国(UN)可持续发展目标(SDGs)的重大挑战。PIA和SB导致160万死于非传染性疾病(NCDs)。世界卫生组织(WHO)敦促各国政府实施基于行为理论的干预措施,旨在减少PIA和SB。然而,对理论范围的关注有限,技术,以及行为理论设计的背景条件。为此,我们着手绘制这些干预措施,他们的行动水平,他们的交付方式,以及他们如何广泛地应用行为理论,constructs,和技术。
    方法:遵循Arksey和O\'Malley(2005)的范围审查方法,我们纳入了以PIA和SB为中心的行为理论干预措施的同行评审文章,在2010年至2023年之间以阿拉伯文出版,法语,和英语在四个数据库中(Scopus,WebofScience[WOS],PubMed,和谷歌学者)。我们采用了基于行为理论干预的上层本体论的框架主题分析,行为理论分类,和第一个版本(V1)的行为改变技术(BCT)分类法。
    结果:我们纳入了最初筛选/检索的1,173项研究中的29项。大多数干预措施都是单独集中的(n=15)。很少有研究涉及人际关系水平(n=6)或组织水平(n=6)。只有两种干预措施可以被描述为系统性的(即,解决个人问题,人际关系,组织,和制度因素)(n=2)。大多数行为改变干预使用四种理论:社会认知理论(SCT),社会生态模型(SEM),SDT,和跨理论模型(TTM)。大多数行为改变干预措施(BCIS)涉及目标设定,社会支持,和具有不同程度理论使用的行动计划(密集[n=15],中等[n=11],或低[n=3])。
    结论:我们的综述表明,有必要开发系统性和补充性干预措施,行为变化的中观和宏观障碍。理论知情的BCI需要将协同的BCT整合到使用微观,确定行为变化的中观和宏观理论。未来的干预措施需要适当地使用行为理论和BCT的组合来解决行为变化的系统性以及背景和目标人群的异质性。
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide, physical inactivity (PIA) and sedentary behavior (SB) are recognized as significant challenges hindering the achievement of the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs). PIA and SB are responsible for 1.6 million deaths attributed to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The World Health Organization (WHO) has urged governments to implement interventions informed by behavioral theories aimed at reducing PIA and SB. However, limited attention has been given to the range of theories, techniques, and contextual conditions underlying the design of behavioral theories. To this end, we set out to map these interventions, their levels of action, their mode of delivery, and how extensively they apply behavioral theories, constructs, and techniques.
    METHODS: Following the scoping review methodology of Arksey and O\'Malley (2005), we included peer-reviewed articles on behavioral theories interventions centered on PIA and SB, published between 2010 and 2023 in Arabic, French, and English in four databases (Scopus, Web of Science [WoS], PubMed, and Google Scholar). We adopted a framework thematic analysis based on the upper-level ontology of behavior theories interventions, Behavioral theories taxonomies, and the first version (V1) taxonomy of behavior change techniques(BCTs).
    RESULTS: We included 29 studies out of 1,173 that were initially screened/searched. The majority of interventions were individually focused (n = 15). Few studies have addressed interpersonal levels (n = 6) or organizational levels (n = 6). Only two interventions can be described as systemic (i.e., addressing the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and institutional factors)(n = 2). Most behavior change interventions use four theories: The Social cognitive theory (SCT), the socioecological model (SEM), SDT, and the transtheoretical model (TTM). Most behavior change interventions (BCIS) involve goal setting, social support, and action planning with various degrees of theoretical use (intensive [n = 15], moderate [n = 11], or low [n = 3]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests the need to develop systemic and complementary interventions that entail the micro-, meso- and macro-level barriers to behavioral changes. Theory informed BCI need to integrate synergistic BCTs into models that use micro-, meso- and macro-level theories to determine behavioral change. Future interventions need to appropriately use a mix of behavioral theories and BCTs to address the systemic nature of behavioral change as well as the heterogeneity of contexts and targeted populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于计划的干预措施通常用于帮助个人养成习惯。现有文献提出了一种一刀切的习惯形成方法,但是,如果针对个体差异和/或行为复杂性进行定制,则计划干预措施可能会得到优化。我们检验了以下假设:计划在与个人的昼夜偏好相匹配的时间进行相对复杂的行为(锻炼)将促进行为参与;而对于更简单的行为(补钙),新行为的最佳时间将发生在早晨。年轻,女性志愿者(N=317)被随机分配服用钙补充剂或运动4周,并进行对照(无计划)或接受3项计划干预措施之一(早计划;晚计划;未分配时间计划).参与者每周报告基线时的昼夜偏好以及习惯强度和行为频率。FitbitZips和药物事件监测系统帽(MEMS)用于客观评估行为参与。多水平模型发现,在早晨提示条件下,早晨类型的补钙作用最大,而锻炼对于早晨提示的早晨类型和晚上提示的晚上类型是最大的。习惯形成策略可能取决于昼夜偏好和行为复杂性。未来的研究可以评估其他个体差异的作用。
    Planning-based interventions are often used to help individuals form habits. Existing literature suggests a one-size-fits all approach to habit formation, but planning interventions may be optimized if tailored to individual differences and/or behavioral complexity. We test the hypothesis that planning to do a relatively complex behaviour (exercise) at a time that matches an individuals\' diurnal preference will facilitate behavioral engagement; whereas for a simpler behaviour (calcium supplementation), the optimal time-of-day for a new behavior will occur in the morning. Young, women volunteers (N = 317) were randomly assigned to take calcium supplements or to exercise for 4 weeks and to control (no planning) or to one of three planning interventions (morning plan; evening plan; unassigned-time plan). Participants reported diurnal preference at baseline and habit strength and behavioral frequency weekly. Fitbit Zips and Medication Event Monitoring System Caps (MEMS) were used to objectively assess behavioral engagement. Multilevel modelling found that calcium-supplementation was greatest for morning-types in the morning-cue condition, whereas exercise was greatest for morning-types with morning cues and evening-types with evening cues. Habit-formation strategies may depend on diurnal preference and behavioral complexity. Future research can evaluate the role of other individual differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖患者的最佳治疗和护理组织是当今卫生服务面临的最大挑战之一。虽然手术和药物治疗为一些肥胖患者提供了有效的治疗选择,行为干预对于支持长期行为改变很重要。然而,对行为干预最有效的组成部分知之甚少,对于患有复杂或严重肥胖症(即体重指数[BMI]>35kg/m2)的人尤其如此。因此,当前的快速综述旨在确定哪些行为改变技术(BCT)对(重度)肥胖成人的减重有效.次要目的是回顾BCT对饮食行为和身体活动的影响,和心理结果,认识到行为干预通常针对这些。搜索Scopus,OvidMedline,和WebofScience得出了1227个结果,有22条评论符合纳入条件。最常报告的BCT是自我监测和目标设定,但是这些对肥胖成年人的体重有不同的影响。将这些BCT与其他自我调节技术相结合导致体重减轻增加。Further,对于患有严重肥胖的成年人,所谓的“轻推”技术和自我调节技术与更大的体重减轻有关。三篇评论还发现,虽然自我监测增加了身体活动,行为承诺增加了饮食行为的变化。BCT与心理健康无关。审查证实,行为干预对体重管理有影响,包括更复杂或更严重的肥胖个体,但强调需要进一步研究它们在临床环境中的使用。
    The optimal treatment and organization of care for people with obesity is one of the greatest challenges facing today\'s health services. While surgery and pharmacotherapy offer effective treatment options for some people with obesity, behavioral interventions are important to support long-term behavioral change. However, little is known about the most effective components of behavioral interventions, and this is especially the case for people with complex or severe obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] > 35 kg/m2). Accordingly, the current rapid review aimed to identify which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective for weight loss in adults with (severe) obesity. A secondary aim was to review the effects of BCTs on dietary behaviors and physical activity, and psychological outcomes, recognizing that behavioral interventions commonly target these. A search of Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science resulted in 1227 results, with 22 reviews eligible for inclusion. The most commonly reported BCTs were self-monitoring and goal setting, but these had variable effects on weight in adults with obesity. Combining these BCTs with other self-regulatory techniques led to increased weight loss. Further, for adults with severe obesity, so-called \'nudge\' techniques and self-regulatory techniques were associated with greater weight loss. Three reviews also found that while self-monitoring increased physical activity, behavioral commitments increased changes to dietary behaviors. BCTs were not associated with psychological well-being. The review confirms that behavioral interventions have an impact in weight management, including for individuals with more complex or severe obesity, but highlights the need for further investigation of their use within clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    超重和肥胖是全球范围内最普遍的健康问题,导致各种疾病并对医疗保健系统产生重大影响。在德国,成人肥胖的患病率为19%.移动健康应用程序提供了一种新的治疗和预防方法,并已在先前的研究中被证明是有效的。然而,调查这些数字应用程序的可用性和质量至关重要。这项系统评估的目的是评估旨在治疗肥胖症的德语数字健康应用程序的可及性和质量。
    2024年1月,在GooglePlay商店和AppleAppStore上对移动健康应用程序进行了系统搜索。只有那些适用于iOS和Android的德语应用程序被认为是可以接受的。德国移动应用评定量表(MARS-G)用于评估应用程序的质量。使用德国肥胖协会的肥胖治疗指南评估了移动健康应用程序的内容。总结和介绍了应用程序的特点,结果使用描述性统计进行分析,并在表格中显示。
    筛选后,十个应用程序被纳入审查。这些应用程序在卡路里跟踪方面有所不同,个人锻炼计划,教育方面,营养计划,和行为改变的练习。平均而言,德国肥胖指南建议的12个项目中有6.4个得到满足。MARS评分(可能的范围为1-5)达到平均值3.39(SD=0.39)。“参与度”部分的质量得分最低,平均值为3.14(SD=0.57),而“美学”部分的最高平均值为3.57(SD=0.52)。
    大多数用于管理肥胖的德国移动健康应用程序符合一些指南建议。根据MARS评分,它们表现出足够的质量。评估移动医疗应用程序的质量对患者来说可能是一个挑战,尽管容易接近且门槛低。然而,这样的数字健康应用,由德国SHI报销,提供基于证据的信息,即使访问可以与更高的障碍相关联。
    UNASSIGNED: Overweight and obesity are among the most prevalent health problems worldwide leading to various diseases and having a significant impact on the healthcare system. In Germany, the prevalence of obesity among adults is 19%. Mobile health applications offer a new approach to treatment and prevention and have been proven effective in previous studies. However, it is essential to investigate the availability and quality of these digital applications. The aim of this systematic assessment is to evaluate the accessibility and quality of digital health applications in German language designed to treat obesity.
    UNASSIGNED: In January 2024, a systematic search for mobile health applications was conducted on both the Google Play Store and Apple App Store. Just those apps available in German for both iOS and Android were considered acceptable. The German Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS-G) was used to assess the quality of the apps. The content of mobile health applications was evaluated using the guideline from the German Obesity Society for the treatment of obesity. The characteristics of the apps were summarized and presented, and the results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented in tables.
    UNASSIGNED: After screening, ten apps were included in the review. The apps varied in terms of calorie tracking, individual workout plans, educational aspects, nutritional plans, and exercises for behavioral change. On average, 6.4 out of 12 items of the German Obesity guideline recommendations were fulfilled. The MARS score (possible range from 1-5) reached a mean of 3.39 (SD = 0.39). The section \"Engagement\" had the lowest quality score with a mean of 3.14 (SD = 0.57), while the section \"Aesthetics\" achieved the highest mean of 3.57 (SD = 0.52).
    UNASSIGNED: Most German mobile health applications for managing obesity meet some guideline recommendations. They demonstrate adequate to good quality according to the MARS score. Assessing the quality of mobile health applications can be challenging for patients, despite being easily accessible and low-threshold. However, such digital health applications, reimbursed by the German SHI, offer evidence-based information, even if access can be associated with higher hurdles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:行为改变技术(BCT)被认为是实施策略的活动组件,影响决定因素和,最终,实施绩效。在我们之前的Delphi研究中,专家制定了“实施假设”,详细说明BCT和策略的特定组合(称为BCT-策略组合)如何影响青年护理中的决定因素和指南实施。例如,假设提供指南使用说明的教育会议是为了提高从业人员的知识,因此,指导方针实施。然而,这些假设尚未在实践中得到验证。
    方法:我们进行了一项涉及青年(健康)护理组织的从业人员和管理专业人员的横断面研究。使用问卷,我们获得了有关BCT策略组合的存在及其对决定因素和实施绩效的感知影响的数据.采用卡方检验和回归分析来确定特定BCT策略组合对决定因素和实施绩效的影响。
    结果:我们的分析包括来自104名从业人员和34名管理专业人员的数据。大多数管理专业人员表示,BCT策略组合对其实施绩效产生了积极影响或有可能影响。在从业者层面,一半的组合被认为对决定因素和实施绩效有积极影响。此外,报告不存在BCT-策略组合的从业者更怀疑其对决定因素和实施绩效的潜在影响.
    结论:认为几种BCT策略组合可以改善或潜在地改善从业人员和管理专业人员的实施绩效。在制定和评估执行工作中,我们主张清楚地描述实施工作的目标,并使用详细介绍BCT诱导行为变化的框架,所采用的策略,以及驱动观察到的变化的过程。理解这些相互关联的过程在设计有针对性的、基于证据的行为改变干预措施。这种理解优化了资源分配,并有助于青年护理实施工作的整体成功。
    BACKGROUND: Behavior change techniques (BCTs) are considered as active components of implementation strategies, influencing determinants and, ultimately, implementation performance. In our previous Delphi study, experts formulated \'implementation hypotheses\', detailing how specific combinations of BCTs and strategies (referred to as BCT-strategy combinations) might influence determinants and guideline implementation within youth care. For example, educational meetings providing instructions on guideline use were hypothesized to enhance practitioners\' knowledge and, consequently, guideline implementation. However, these hypotheses have not been verified in practice yet.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study involving practitioners and management professionals from youth (health)care organizations. Using questionnaires, we obtained data on the presence of BCT-strategy combinations and their perceived influence on determinants and implementation performance. Chi-squared tests and regression analyses were employed to determine the influence of specific BCT-strategy combinations on determinants and implementation performance.
    RESULTS: Our analyses included data from 104 practitioners and 34 management professionals. Most of the management professionals indicated that the BCT-strategy combinations positively influenced or had the potential to influence their implementation performance. At the practitioner level, half of the combinations were perceived to have a positive influence on determinants and implementation performance. Furthermore, practitioners who reported the absence of BCT-strategy combinations were more skeptical about their potential influence on determinants and implementation performance.
    CONCLUSIONS: Several BCT-strategy combinations were perceived to improve or potentially improve implementation performance of both practitioners and management professionals. In the development and evaluation of implementation efforts, we advocate for clearly describing the implementation effort\'s objective and using frameworks that detail the BCTs inducing behavior change, the strategy employed, and the processes driving the observed changes. Understanding these interconnected processes is important in designing targeted, evidence-based behavior change interventions. This understanding optimizes resource allocation and contributes to the overall success of implementation efforts in youth care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    能够记录大脑和周围神经系统活动的神经科学技术的发展推动了认知科学的研究。最近的技术进步为诱导行为改变提供了新的可能性,特别是通过具有成本效益的基于互联网的干预措施。然而,实验室设备数量的限制阻碍了结果在现实生活中的推广。物联网(IoT)设备的出现,比如可穿戴设备,装有传感器和微芯片,开启了行为改变技术的新纪元。可穿戴设备,包括智能手表,电子纹身,还有更多,准备大规模采用,预计未来五年的年增长率为55%。这些设备启用个性化指令,提高生产力和效率,特别是在工业生产中。此外,医疗保健行业对可穿戴设备的需求很大,超过80%的全球消费者愿意使用它们进行健康监测。这项研究探讨了可穿戴设备的主要生物识别应用及其对用户福祉的影响,专注于物联网设备促进的行为改变技术的集成。可穿戴设备通过提供实时反馈,彻底改变了健康监测,个性化干预,和游戏化。他们通过提供即时反馈来鼓励积极的行为改变,量身定制的建议,和游戏化的体验,导致健康状况的持续改善。此外,可穿戴设备与数字平台无缝集成,通过社会支持和连通性增强其影响。然而,必须解决隐私和数据安全问题,以维护用户的信任。随着技术的不断进步,物联网设备的设计和功能的改进对于促进行为改变和改善健康结果至关重要。本研究旨在调查可穿戴设备促进的行为改变技术对个人健康结果的影响,以及可穿戴设备在促进更健康的生活方式中的作用。
    The development of neuroscientific techniques enabling the recording of brain and peripheral nervous system activity has fueled research in cognitive science. Recent technological advancements offer new possibilities for inducing behavioral change, particularly through cost-effective Internet-based interventions. However, limitations in laboratory equipment volume have hindered the generalization of results to real-life contexts. The advent of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, such as wearables, equipped with sensors and microchips, has ushered in a new era in behavior change techniques. Wearables, including smartwatches, electronic tattoos, and more, are poised for massive adoption, with an expected annual growth rate of 55% over the next five years. These devices enable personalized instructions, leading to increased productivity and efficiency, particularly in industrial production. Additionally, the healthcare sector has seen a significant demand for wearables, with over 80% of global consumers willing to use them for health monitoring. This research explores the primary biometric applications of wearables and their impact on users\' well-being, focusing on the integration of behavior change techniques facilitated by IoT devices. Wearables have revolutionized health monitoring by providing real-time feedback, personalized interventions, and gamification. They encourage positive behavior changes by delivering immediate feedback, tailored recommendations, and gamified experiences, leading to sustained improvements in health. Furthermore, wearables seamlessly integrate with digital platforms, enhancing their impact through social support and connectivity. However, privacy and data security concerns must be addressed to maintain users\' trust. As technology continues to advance, the refinement of IoT devices\' design and functionality is crucial for promoting behavior change and improving health outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effects of behavior change techniques facilitated by wearables on individuals\' health outcomes and the role of wearables in promoting a healthier lifestyle.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着新兴技术的发展,数字行为改变干预(DBCI)有助于在日常生活中保持规律的身体活动。
    目的:为了全面了解当前DBCI中习惯形成技术的设计实现,进行了系统的审查,以调查行为改变技术的实施,习惯形成技术的类型,以及当前DBCI中的设计策略。
    方法:本综述遵循PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。从2012年到2022年,共系统地搜索了4个数据库,其中包括WebofScience,Scopus,ACM数字图书馆,和PubMed。纳入标准包括使用数字工具进行身体活动的研究,检查行为改变干预技术,用英语写的.
    结果:本综述共纳入41篇研究文章。结果表明,应用最多的行为改变技术是行为的自我监控,目标设定,提示和提示。此外,习惯形成技术是根据意图确定和发展的,提示,和积极的强化。常用的方法包括自动监测,描述性反馈,一般准则,自我设定的目标,基于时间的线索,虚拟奖励
    结论:总结了总共32种习惯形成技术的常用设计策略,并将其映射到所提出的概念框架中,分为目标介导的(泛化和个性化)和技术介导的相互作用(显性和隐性)。现有的大多数研究都使用显式交互,在DBCI的设计策略中与个性化习惯形成技术保持一致。然而,在综述的研究中,内隐交互设计策略是缺乏的。拟议的概念框架和潜在的解决方案可以作为设计旨在在DBCI中形成习惯的策略的指南。
    BACKGROUND: With the development of emerging technologies, digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) help to maintain regular physical activity in daily life.
    OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively understand the design implementations of habit formation techniques in current DBCIs, a systematic review was conducted to investigate the implementations of behavior change techniques, types of habit formation techniques, and design strategies in current DBCIs.
    METHODS: The process of this review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 4 databases were systematically searched from 2012 to 2022, which included Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and PubMed. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that used digital tools for physical activity, examined behavior change intervention techniques, and were written in English.
    RESULTS: A total of 41 identified research articles were included in this review. The results show that the most applied behavior change techniques were the self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, and prompts and cues. Moreover, habit formation techniques were identified and developed based on intentions, cues, and positive reinforcement. Commonly used methods included automatic monitoring, descriptive feedback, general guidelines, self-set goals, time-based cues, and virtual rewards.
    CONCLUSIONS: A total of 32 commonly design strategies of habit formation techniques were summarized and mapped to the proposed conceptual framework, which was categorized into target-mediated (generalization and personalization) and technology-mediated interactions (explicitness and implicitness). Most of the existing studies use the explicit interaction, aligning with the personalized habit formation techniques in the design strategies of DBCIs. However, implicit interaction design strategies are lacking in the reviewed studies. The proposed conceptual framework and potential solutions can serve as guidelines for designing strategies aimed at habit formation within DBCIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号