behavior change techniques

行为改变技术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多阶段优化策略(MOST)是一个三阶段迭代框架,可以加速行为干预的发展。这项系统评价和荟萃分析是在MOST准备阶段进行的,旨在对儿科睡眠持续时间干预措施中包含的成分进行分类。使用行为改变技术(BCT)分类。在37项干预措施中,已经使用了93个BCT中的46个,每个研究平均使用8种技术。使用的最常见的BCT是关于如何执行行为的指令(N=29;代码4.1),实际社会支持(N=22;代码:3.2),和行为练习/排练(N=22;代码:8.1)。潜在的类别分析确定了两类干预措施,以以下行为变化群体中存在的BCT为特征:塑造知识,自然后果,行为比较,重复和替换。我们的荟萃分析显示,属于这些行为改变组(N=15)的潜在类别的干预措施具有14分钟(95%CI:8-21)与没有这些行为改变组(N=19)的干预措施的8分钟(95%CI:1-15)的合并积极干预效果。这项系统评价和荟萃分析将促进睡眠促进干预措施的发展,并指导未来优化和随机对照试验的候选干预组件的选择。
    The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) is a three-phase iterative framework that could accelerate the development of behavioral interventions. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted within the MOST preparation phase and aimed to classify components included in pediatric sleep duration interventions, using the Behavior Change Technique (BCT) Taxonomy. Across 37 interventions, 46 out of 93 BCTs have been used, with an average of 8 techniques used per study. The most common BCTs used were instruction on how to perform the behavior (N = 29; code 4.1), practical social support (N = 22; code: 3.2), and behavioral practice/rehearsal (N = 22; code: 8.1). A latent class analysis identified two classes of interventions, distinguished by the presence of BCTs falling within the following behavior change groups: shaping knowledge, natural consequences, comparison of behavior, and repetition and substitution. Our meta-analysis revealed that interventions belonging to the latent class with these behavior change groups (N = 15) had a pooled positive intervention effect of 14 min (95 % CI: 8-21) versus 8 min (95 % CI: 1-15) for interventions without these behavior change groups (N = 19). This systematic review and meta-analysis will enhance the development of sleep promotion interventions and guide the selection of candidate intervention components for future optimization and randomized control trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管体育活动对健康有益,生活在长期护理设施中的许多老年人导致久坐不动的生活方式,不符合最低限度的体育锻炼建议。确定身体活动干预中使用的行为改变技术(BCT)可以帮助我们了解实现行为改变的潜在机制。本系统评价的目的是确定和评估老年居民身体活动干预中的BCT。检索了6个电子数据库,保留了15个符合条件的研究。确定了9个与老年居民体育活动促进相关的有希望的BCT:可靠的来源,社会支持(未指明),目标设定(结果),目标设定(行为),行为的示范,关于如何执行行为的指令,对行为的自我监控,对行为结果的自我监控,并将对象添加到环境中。鼓励未来的研究选择和定制这些BCT的具体需求和目标人群的偏好。
    Despite the health benefits of physical activity, many older adults living in long-term care facilities lead sedentary lifestyles and do not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Determining the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in physical activity interventions can help us understand the underlying mechanisms by which behavioral change is achieved. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate BCTs in physical activity interventions for the elderly residents. Six electronic databases were searched and 15 eligible studies were retained. Nine promising BCTs associated with physical activity promotion among elderly residents were identified: credible source, social support (unspecified), goal setting (outcome), goal setting (behavior), demonstration of the behavior, instruction on how to perform a behavior, self-monitoring of behavior, self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behavior, and adding objects to the environment. Future research is encouraged to select and tailor these BCTs to the specific needs and preferences of the target population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球,身体不活动(PIA)和久坐行为(SB)被认为是阻碍实现联合国(UN)可持续发展目标(SDGs)的重大挑战。PIA和SB导致160万死于非传染性疾病(NCDs)。世界卫生组织(WHO)敦促各国政府实施基于行为理论的干预措施,旨在减少PIA和SB。然而,对理论范围的关注有限,技术,以及行为理论设计的背景条件。为此,我们着手绘制这些干预措施,他们的行动水平,他们的交付方式,以及他们如何广泛地应用行为理论,constructs,和技术。
    方法:遵循Arksey和O\'Malley(2005)的范围审查方法,我们纳入了以PIA和SB为中心的行为理论干预措施的同行评审文章,在2010年至2023年之间以阿拉伯文出版,法语,和英语在四个数据库中(Scopus,WebofScience[WOS],PubMed,和谷歌学者)。我们采用了基于行为理论干预的上层本体论的框架主题分析,行为理论分类,和第一个版本(V1)的行为改变技术(BCT)分类法。
    结果:我们纳入了最初筛选/检索的1,173项研究中的29项。大多数干预措施都是单独集中的(n=15)。很少有研究涉及人际关系水平(n=6)或组织水平(n=6)。只有两种干预措施可以被描述为系统性的(即,解决个人问题,人际关系,组织,和制度因素)(n=2)。大多数行为改变干预使用四种理论:社会认知理论(SCT),社会生态模型(SEM),SDT,和跨理论模型(TTM)。大多数行为改变干预措施(BCIS)涉及目标设定,社会支持,和具有不同程度理论使用的行动计划(密集[n=15],中等[n=11],或低[n=3])。
    结论:我们的综述表明,有必要开发系统性和补充性干预措施,行为变化的中观和宏观障碍。理论知情的BCI需要将协同的BCT整合到使用微观,确定行为变化的中观和宏观理论。未来的干预措施需要适当地使用行为理论和BCT的组合来解决行为变化的系统性以及背景和目标人群的异质性。
    BACKGROUND: Worldwide, physical inactivity (PIA) and sedentary behavior (SB) are recognized as significant challenges hindering the achievement of the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals (SDGs). PIA and SB are responsible for 1.6 million deaths attributed to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). The World Health Organization (WHO) has urged governments to implement interventions informed by behavioral theories aimed at reducing PIA and SB. However, limited attention has been given to the range of theories, techniques, and contextual conditions underlying the design of behavioral theories. To this end, we set out to map these interventions, their levels of action, their mode of delivery, and how extensively they apply behavioral theories, constructs, and techniques.
    METHODS: Following the scoping review methodology of Arksey and O\'Malley (2005), we included peer-reviewed articles on behavioral theories interventions centered on PIA and SB, published between 2010 and 2023 in Arabic, French, and English in four databases (Scopus, Web of Science [WoS], PubMed, and Google Scholar). We adopted a framework thematic analysis based on the upper-level ontology of behavior theories interventions, Behavioral theories taxonomies, and the first version (V1) taxonomy of behavior change techniques(BCTs).
    RESULTS: We included 29 studies out of 1,173 that were initially screened/searched. The majority of interventions were individually focused (n = 15). Few studies have addressed interpersonal levels (n = 6) or organizational levels (n = 6). Only two interventions can be described as systemic (i.e., addressing the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and institutional factors)(n = 2). Most behavior change interventions use four theories: The Social cognitive theory (SCT), the socioecological model (SEM), SDT, and the transtheoretical model (TTM). Most behavior change interventions (BCIS) involve goal setting, social support, and action planning with various degrees of theoretical use (intensive [n = 15], moderate [n = 11], or low [n = 3]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review suggests the need to develop systemic and complementary interventions that entail the micro-, meso- and macro-level barriers to behavioral changes. Theory informed BCI need to integrate synergistic BCTs into models that use micro-, meso- and macro-level theories to determine behavioral change. Future interventions need to appropriately use a mix of behavioral theories and BCTs to address the systemic nature of behavioral change as well as the heterogeneity of contexts and targeted populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥胖患者的最佳治疗和护理组织是当今卫生服务面临的最大挑战之一。虽然手术和药物治疗为一些肥胖患者提供了有效的治疗选择,行为干预对于支持长期行为改变很重要。然而,对行为干预最有效的组成部分知之甚少,对于患有复杂或严重肥胖症(即体重指数[BMI]>35kg/m2)的人尤其如此。因此,当前的快速综述旨在确定哪些行为改变技术(BCT)对(重度)肥胖成人的减重有效.次要目的是回顾BCT对饮食行为和身体活动的影响,和心理结果,认识到行为干预通常针对这些。搜索Scopus,OvidMedline,和WebofScience得出了1227个结果,有22条评论符合纳入条件。最常报告的BCT是自我监测和目标设定,但是这些对肥胖成年人的体重有不同的影响。将这些BCT与其他自我调节技术相结合导致体重减轻增加。Further,对于患有严重肥胖的成年人,所谓的“轻推”技术和自我调节技术与更大的体重减轻有关。三篇评论还发现,虽然自我监测增加了身体活动,行为承诺增加了饮食行为的变化。BCT与心理健康无关。审查证实,行为干预对体重管理有影响,包括更复杂或更严重的肥胖个体,但强调需要进一步研究它们在临床环境中的使用。
    The optimal treatment and organization of care for people with obesity is one of the greatest challenges facing today\'s health services. While surgery and pharmacotherapy offer effective treatment options for some people with obesity, behavioral interventions are important to support long-term behavioral change. However, little is known about the most effective components of behavioral interventions, and this is especially the case for people with complex or severe obesity (i.e. body mass index [BMI] > 35 kg/m2). Accordingly, the current rapid review aimed to identify which behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective for weight loss in adults with (severe) obesity. A secondary aim was to review the effects of BCTs on dietary behaviors and physical activity, and psychological outcomes, recognizing that behavioral interventions commonly target these. A search of Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science resulted in 1227 results, with 22 reviews eligible for inclusion. The most commonly reported BCTs were self-monitoring and goal setting, but these had variable effects on weight in adults with obesity. Combining these BCTs with other self-regulatory techniques led to increased weight loss. Further, for adults with severe obesity, so-called \'nudge\' techniques and self-regulatory techniques were associated with greater weight loss. Three reviews also found that while self-monitoring increased physical activity, behavioral commitments increased changes to dietary behaviors. BCTs were not associated with psychological well-being. The review confirms that behavioral interventions have an impact in weight management, including for individuals with more complex or severe obesity, but highlights the need for further investigation of their use within clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着新兴技术的发展,数字行为改变干预(DBCI)有助于在日常生活中保持规律的身体活动。
    目的:为了全面了解当前DBCI中习惯形成技术的设计实现,进行了系统的审查,以调查行为改变技术的实施,习惯形成技术的类型,以及当前DBCI中的设计策略。
    方法:本综述遵循PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。从2012年到2022年,共系统地搜索了4个数据库,其中包括WebofScience,Scopus,ACM数字图书馆,和PubMed。纳入标准包括使用数字工具进行身体活动的研究,检查行为改变干预技术,用英语写的.
    结果:本综述共纳入41篇研究文章。结果表明,应用最多的行为改变技术是行为的自我监控,目标设定,提示和提示。此外,习惯形成技术是根据意图确定和发展的,提示,和积极的强化。常用的方法包括自动监测,描述性反馈,一般准则,自我设定的目标,基于时间的线索,虚拟奖励
    结论:总结了总共32种习惯形成技术的常用设计策略,并将其映射到所提出的概念框架中,分为目标介导的(泛化和个性化)和技术介导的相互作用(显性和隐性)。现有的大多数研究都使用显式交互,在DBCI的设计策略中与个性化习惯形成技术保持一致。然而,在综述的研究中,内隐交互设计策略是缺乏的。拟议的概念框架和潜在的解决方案可以作为设计旨在在DBCI中形成习惯的策略的指南。
    BACKGROUND: With the development of emerging technologies, digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) help to maintain regular physical activity in daily life.
    OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively understand the design implementations of habit formation techniques in current DBCIs, a systematic review was conducted to investigate the implementations of behavior change techniques, types of habit formation techniques, and design strategies in current DBCIs.
    METHODS: The process of this review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 4 databases were systematically searched from 2012 to 2022, which included Web of Science, Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and PubMed. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies that used digital tools for physical activity, examined behavior change intervention techniques, and were written in English.
    RESULTS: A total of 41 identified research articles were included in this review. The results show that the most applied behavior change techniques were the self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, and prompts and cues. Moreover, habit formation techniques were identified and developed based on intentions, cues, and positive reinforcement. Commonly used methods included automatic monitoring, descriptive feedback, general guidelines, self-set goals, time-based cues, and virtual rewards.
    CONCLUSIONS: A total of 32 commonly design strategies of habit formation techniques were summarized and mapped to the proposed conceptual framework, which was categorized into target-mediated (generalization and personalization) and technology-mediated interactions (explicitness and implicitness). Most of the existing studies use the explicit interaction, aligning with the personalized habit formation techniques in the design strategies of DBCIs. However, implicit interaction design strategies are lacking in the reviewed studies. The proposed conceptual framework and potential solutions can serve as guidelines for designing strategies aimed at habit formation within DBCIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究论文深入研究了信息技术促进的行为改变技术的有效性和影响,特别是可穿戴设备和物联网(IoT)设备,在工程和计算机科学领域。通过对来自Scopus数据库的相关文献进行全面审查,这项研究旨在阐明这些技术用于促进行为改变及其对个人和社会的潜在益处的机制和策略。通过统计测量和相关工作,我们的工作探索了二十年来的趋势,从2000年到2023年,了解可穿戴和物联网技术中行为改变技术的不断发展。一个特别的重点是一个案例研究,研究行为改变技术(BCT)在使用可穿戴设备监测生命体征方面的应用,强调了在技术和人类行为的这个关键交叉中进一步调查的相关性和紧迫性。这些发现揭示了可穿戴设备和物联网设备在促进积极行为改变和改善个人整体福祉方面的有希望的作用,并强调了在这一领域继续研究和开发的必要性,以充分利用技术的潜力来造福社会。
    This research paper delves into the effectiveness and impact of behavior change techniques fostered by information technologies, particularly wearables and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, within the realms of engineering and computer science. By conducting a comprehensive review of the relevant literature sourced from the Scopus database, this study aims to elucidate the mechanisms and strategies employed by these technologies to facilitate behavior change and their potential benefits to individuals and society. Through statistical measurements and related works, our work explores the trends over a span of two decades, from 2000 to 2023, to understand the evolving landscape of behavior change techniques in wearable and IoT technologies. A specific focus is placed on a case study examining the application of behavior change techniques (BCTs) for monitoring vital signs using wearables, underscoring the relevance and urgency of further investigation in this critical intersection of technology and human behavior. The findings shed light on the promising role of wearables and IoT devices for promoting positive behavior modifications and improving individuals\' overall well-being and highlighting the need for continued research and development in this area to harness the full potential of technology for societal benefit.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:目的是评估(i)理论实施的质量,(ii)行为改变技术的应用,和(iii)基于理论的干预措施在促进孕妇体育锻炼和改善孕产妇和新生儿结局方面的有效性。
    方法:在8个数据库中进行了系统搜索(护理和相关健康文献的累积指数,Cochrane图书馆,EMBASE,MEDLINE,APAPsycINFO,PubMed,SPORTDiscus,和WebofScience),以确定从数据库开始到2023年7月8日发表的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具评估纳入研究的质量。理论编码方案用于衡量理论实现的质量,和行为改变技术是根据行为改变分类法(版本1)编码的。使用RevMan5.3进行荟萃分析。建议的分级,评估,发展,采用评估方法对证据的确定性进行评估。
    结果:11项研究符合研究标准。九项研究基于一种理论,而两项研究是基于两种理论的结合。理论实施的质量总体上是中等的。总共提取了24种独特的行为改变技术。最常用的行为改变技术类型是“关于如何执行行为的指令”(n=9),“目标设定”(行为)(n=8),“行动计划”(n=7),和“关于健康后果的信息”(n=7)。基于理论的干预措施显着改善了中等至剧烈的身体活动(标准化平均差(SMD)=0.17,95%置信区间(CI)[0.04,0.30],P=0.01;证据的中等确定性),降低了每周平均妊娠体重增加(平均差(MD)=-0.06,95%CI[-0.11,-0.01],P=0.02;证据的中等确定性),并降低妊娠期糖尿病的发病率(风险比(RR)=0.64,95%CI[0.46,0.89],P=0.008;证据的高确定性)。然而,基于理论的干预措施对总身体活动的影响,妊娠期总增重、妊娠期高血压和早产发生率不明确(P>0.05)。
    结论:(i)大多数研究表现出中等水平的理论实施质量。(二)理论的运用各不相同,但是在研究中发现了常见的行为改变技术。(iii)基于理论的干预措施可以改善身体活动以及产妇和新生儿的结局,并且似乎是安全的。在未来的干预措施中应充分利用适当的健康行为理论和行为改变技术。
    背景:PROSPERO:CRD42023440886。
    结论:基于理论的干预措施可以改善体力活动和母婴结局,而且看起来是安全的。在未来干预措施的发展中应充分利用适当的健康行为理论和行为改变技术。
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives were to assess (i) the quality of theory implementation, (ii) the application of behavior change techniques, and (iii) the effectiveness of theory-based interventions in promoting physical activity in pregnant women and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across 8 databases (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science) to identify randomized controlled trials published from database inception to 8 July 2023. The Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The theory coding scheme was used to measure the quality of theory implementation, and behavior change techniques were coded according to behavior change taxonomy (version 1). The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence.
    RESULTS: Eleven studies met the study criteria. Nine studies were based on one theory, while two studies were based on a combination of two theories. The quality of theory implementation was generally moderate. A total of 24 unique behavior change techniques were extracted. The most commonly used types of behavior change techniques were \'instruction on how to perform the behavior\' (n = 9), \'goal setting\' (behavior) (n = 8), \'action planning\' (n = 7), and \'information about health consequences\' (n = 7). Theory-based interventions significantly improved moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.17, 95 % confidence interval (CI) [0.04, 0.30], P = 0.01; moderate certainty of evidence), reduced the average gestational weight gain per week (mean difference (MD) = -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.11, -0.01], P = 0.02; moderate certainty of evidence), and decreased the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (risk ratio (RR) = 0.64, 95 % CI [0.46, 0.89], P = 0.008; high certainty of evidence). However, the effects of theory-based interventions on total physical activity, total gestational weight gain and the incidence of gestational hypertension and preterm delivery were unclear (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: (i) Most of the studies exhibited a moderate level of theory implementation quality. (ii) The use of theories varies, but common behavior change techniques were found across studies. (iii) Theory-based interventions can improve physical activity and maternal and neonatal outcomes and appear to be safe. Appropriate health behavior theories and behavior change techniques should be fully utilized in future interventions.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO: CRD42023440886.
    CONCLUSIONS: Theory-based interventions can improve physical activity and maternal and neonatal outcomes and appear to be safe. Appropriate health behavior theories and behavior change techniques should be fully utilized in the development of future interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:了解针对老年人的身体活动计划/服务的随机对照试验(RCT)中使用的行为改变技术(BCT)可以帮助我们指导其在现实世界中的实施。
    目的:本研究旨在:(a)确定老年人身体活动项目/服务中使用的BCT的数量和类型,高质量的随机对照试验和(b)探讨不同BCT对不同结局域的影响。
    方法:这是世卫组织委托对老年人身体活动计划/服务进行快速审查的二级数据分析。使用已发布的BCT分类法,对56项试验测试了70种干预措施,对存在的BCT的类型和数量进行了编码。使用最常见的BCT从身体活动干预中发现的积极影响的比例是针对身体活动的结果计算的。内在能力,功能能力,社会领域,认知和情感功能,幸福和生活质量。
    结果:在纳入的试验中确定了93个可能的BCT中的39个,总共529个BCT(平均7.6个,范围2-17)。最常见的BCT是“行动计划”(68/70干预),“关于如何执行行为的说明”(60/70),“分级任务”(53/70),“行为示范”(44/70),和“行为实践/排练”(43/70)。使用任何最常见的BCT的干预措施对身体活动和社会领域的结果表现出压倒性的积极影响。
    结论:考虑哪些BCT被纳入干预措施及其对结果的影响可以提高未来干预措施的有效性和实施。为了实现这一点,供应商可以设计,工具,并使用BCT分类法评估干预措施。
    旨在改变健康相关行为的干预措施,比如身体活动,通常是复杂的,有许多组件。为了更好地理解干预措施的“活性成分”,“我们对世界卫生组织(WHO)委托的快速审查进行了二次分析,使用行为改变技术(BCT)分类法。我们旨在对老年人身体活动计划中BCT的数量和类型进行分类,如随机对照试验(RCT)所确定,并检查它们对结果的影响,包括体力活动,内在能力,功能能力,社会领域,认知和情感功能,和幸福。检查56项试验,测试70项干预措施,我们确定了93个可能的BCT中的39个,总共529个跨干预措施的实例。常见的BCT包括“行动计划,“”关于如何执行行为的说明,“”分级任务,“”行为的示范,和“行为练习/排练”。使用10种最常见的BCT进行的干预对身体活动和社会领域的结果表现出压倒性的积极影响。然而,这些BCT在其他领域取得积极成果的干预措施中并不一致,效果变化更大。我们的研究强调了在设计身体活动干预措施时确定BCT和预期结果的重要性。我们主张在设计和实施未来计划时使用分类法,以最大限度地提高效力。
    Understanding behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity programs/services for older adults can help us to guide their implementation in real-world settings.
    This study aims to: (a) identify the number and type of BCTs used in physical activity programs/services for older adults evaluated in large, good quality RCTs and (b) explore the impact of different BCTs on different outcome domains.
    This is a secondary data analysis of a WHO-commissioned rapid review of physical activity programs/services for older adults. Fifty-six trials testing 70 interventions were coded for the type and number of BCTs present using a published BCT taxonomy. The proportion of positive effects found from physical activity interventions using the most common BCTs was calculated for the outcomes of physical activity, intrinsic capacity, functional ability, social domain, cognitive and emotional functioning, and well-being and quality of life.
    Thirty-nine of the 93 possible BCTs were identified in the included trials and 529 BCTs in total (mean 7.6, range 2-17). The most common BCTs were \"action planning\" (68/70 interventions), \"instructions on how to perform a behavior\" (60/70), \"graded tasks\" (53/70), \"demonstration of behavior\" (44/70), and \"behavioral practice/rehearsal\" (43/70). Interventions that used any of the most common BCTs showed overwhelmingly positive impacts on physical activity and social domain outcomes.
    Consideration of which BCTs are included in interventions and their impact on outcomes can improve the effectiveness and implementation of future interventions. To enable this, providers can design, implement, and evaluate interventions using a BCT taxonomy.
    Interventions aimed at modifying health-related behaviors, such as physical activity, are often complex, with numerous components. To better understand interventions’ “active ingredients,” we conducted a secondary analysis of a World Health Organization (WHO)-commissioned rapid review, using a behavior change technique (BCT) taxonomy. We aimed to classify the number and types of BCTs in physical activity programs for older adults, as identified in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and examine their impact on outcomes, including physical activity, intrinsic capacity, functional ability, social domain, cognitive and emotional functioning, and well-being. Examining 56 trials testing 70 interventions, we identified 39 out of 93 possible BCTs, totaling 529 instances across interventions. Common BCTs included “action planning,” “instructions on how to perform a behavior,” “graded tasks,” “demonstration of behavior,” and “behavioral practice/rehearsal.” Interventions using the 10 most common BCTs demonstrated overwhelmingly positive impacts on physical activity and social domain outcomes. However, these BCTs were not consistently present in interventions yielding positive outcomes in other domains, with greater variation in effects. Our study highlights the significance of identifying both BCTs and desired outcomes when designing physical activity interventions. We advocate for the use of a taxonomy in designing and implementing future programs to maximize effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    家庭或护理人员的参与有可能支持癌症幸存者的健康饮食变化。然而,对这些家庭或照顾者参与的饮食干预及其效果知之甚少.本系统综述旨在确定癌症幸存者及其家人或护理人员饮食干预中使用的行为改变技术(BCT),并综合干预对饮食和健康结果的影响。按照PRISMA准则,我们在3个数据库中进行了系统检索,并确定了12项试验(16份同行评审手稿)纳入本综述.从这些手稿中提取数据,并使用BCT分类法鉴定BCT。从12项试验中确定了38项BCT,其中13个用于12个试验中的至少一半。10项研究报告了干预对健康结果的显著影响(例如,肥胖)和六个建议饮食行为显著改善(例如,水果和蔬菜的摄入量)。总的来说,这篇综述发现,对癌症幸存者的家庭或照顾者参与干预显著改善了饮食和健康结局.未来的研究应该确定BCT,特别是针对饮食变化,并制定有效的二元策略,以促进幸存者与其家人或护理人员之间与饮食相关的互动,以增强他们对健康饮食的参与。
    Family or caregiver engagement has the potential to support healthy dietary changes among cancer survivors. However, little is known about these family- or caregiver-involved dietary interventions and their effects. This systematic review aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in dietary interventions for cancer survivors and their families or caregivers and to synthesize intervention effects on dietary and health outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted systematic searches in three databases and identified 12 trials (16 peer-reviewed manuscripts) for inclusion in this review. Data were extracted from these manuscripts and the BCT taxonomy was used to identify the BCTs. A total of 38 BCTs were identified from 12 trials, 13 of which were used in at least half of the 12 trials. Ten studies reported significant intervention effects on health outcomes (e.g., adiposity) and six suggested significant improvements in dietary behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Overall, this review found that family- or caregiver-involved interventions for cancer survivors significantly improved dietary and health outcomes. Future research should identify BCTs particularly for dietary changes and develop effective dyadic strategies to facilitate diet-related interactions between survivors and their families or caregivers to enhance their engagement in healthy diets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    BACKGROUND: Various smartphone applications (apps) for people with tinnitus are available and promise tinnitus relief. Yet, it is difficult for people suffering from tinnitus and healthcare professionals to estimate their quality, potential, or risks. The current study aims to generate an overview of available tinnitus apps in the German language and to offer orientation for research and healthcare providers.
    METHODS: The most prominent stores were searched systematically (November 2020-April 2021; Google Play Store and Apple App Store). Apps specifically developed for tinnitus were evaluated by two independent raters using multiple approaches: a) a quality screening was performed using the German version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS-G), b) intervention components were assessed using a newly developed list of categories, and c) implemented strategies for active tinnitus management were analyzed using behavior change techniques (BCTs).
    RESULTS: The search yielded 1073 apps, of which 21 apps were analyzed. The apps\' overall quality as assessed by MARS‑G was average (M = 3.37, SD = 039). A lot of apps offered sounds (n = 18) and information (n = 9) or assessed tinnitus characteristics (n = 13). Out of 93 BCTs, 24 were identified at least once. Only one app was evaluated in non-randomized trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although a variety of apps are available, most of them focus on a few intervention components (e.g., sounds or information). Therefore, apps do not exploit their potential to impart important evidence-based content for tinnitus management. The app evaluation using multiple approaches points out potential for improvement.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Über App-Stores werden Applikationen (Apps) für Tinnitusbetroffene angeboten und versprechen schnelle Hilfe gegen die Ohrgeräusche. Für Betroffene und Behandelnde ist es jedoch gleichermaßen schwierig, deren Qualität, Potenziale oder Risiken einzuschätzen. Ziel dieser Studie war es, eine Übersicht zu deutschsprachigen Tinnitus-Apps zu erstellen und damit eine Orientierung für Forschung und Versorgung zu geben.
    METHODS: Es wurde eine systematische Recherche (November 2020–April 2021) in den umsatzstärksten Stores (Google Play Store und Apple App Store) durchgeführt. Spezifisch für Tinnitus entwickelte Apps wurden von unabhängigen Wissenschaftlerinnen multiperspektivisch bewertet: (a) ein Qualitäts-Screening erfolgte anhand der deutschen Version der Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS-G), (b) Interventionselemente wurden mittels neu entwickelten Kategoriensystems und (c) implementierte Strategien für aktives Tinnitus-Management anhand von Techniken der Verhaltensänderung (Behavior Change Techniques, BCTs) analysiert.
    UNASSIGNED: Die Suche ergab 1073 Apps, wobei 21 Apps in die Analyse eingingen. Die Apps wiesen nach MARS‑G eine mittlere Qualität auf (M = 3,37; SD = 0,39). Die meisten Apps boten Geräusche (n = 18) und Informationen (n = 9) an oder erfassten Charakteristika des Tinnitus (n = 13). 24 der 93 BCTs wurden mindestens einmal identifiziert. Nur eine App wurde in nicht-randomisierten Studien evaluiert.
    CONCLUSIONS: Wenngleich eine Vielzahl von Apps vorliegt, fokussiert die Mehrzahl auf wenige Elemente (z. B. Geräusche und Informationen). Das Potenzial, über die Apps wichtige, evidenzbasierte Inhalte zur Tinnitusbewältigung zu vermitteln, wird damit nicht ausgeschöpft. Die multiperspektivische Evaluation zeigt Verbesserungspotenzial für Tinnitus-Apps auf.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号