UNASSIGNED: Symptoms in patients with systemic mastocytosis (SM) are associated with an increase in mast cell burden and release of mast cell-derived mediators. The most frequent presentation of SM is indolent SM (ISM), with moderate symptoms and prognosis. Basophil numbers in these patients are generally normal. However, when examining basophil activation in patients with ISM, we noted an abnormal response to N-formylmethione-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP).
UNASSIGNED: Our aim was to compare basophil responsiveness to fMLP and anti-IgE in healthy volunteers and patients with ISM and relate the findings to fMLP receptor (FPR) expression.
UNASSIGNED: Basophils isolated from peripheral blood of 15 patients with ISM and 14 healthy volunteers were stimulated with fMLP or anti-IgE. CD63 expression to assess basophil activation and expression of FPRs were assessed by flow cytometry.
UNASSIGNED: Baseline expression of CD63 on basophils was similar between the healthy volunteers and patients with ISM. fMLP induced higher expression of CD63 on basophils from patients with ISM, whereas responses to anti-IgE were similar between groups. Basophils from patients with ISM also had higher fMLP1 receptor (FPR1) expression, wheresas FPR2 and FPR3 were not detected. fMLP blocked the binding of anti-FPR1 antibody to FPR1, consistent with the conclusion that fMLP signals through FPR1.
UNASSIGNED: Level of fMLP-induced basophil activation is higher in patients with ISM, which is associated with an increase in FPR1 expression. Further investigation is needed to determine why FPR1 expression is elevated, whether such expression might serve as an additional surrogate marker in the diagnosis of ISM, and whether enhanced responses of basophils to fMPL might have some relationship to unexplained episodes of mediator release.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin infusion reaction (VIR), reportedly mediated through Mas-Related G Protein-Coupled Receptor-X2 (MRGPRX2), is the primary vancomycin-induced immediate drug reaction (IDR). Clinically, distinguishing the underlying drug-induced IDR mechanisms is crucial for future treatment strategies, including drug restriction, re-administration, and pretreatment considerations. However, the lack of validated diagnostic tests makes this challenging, often leading to unnecessary drug restriction.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if intradermal tests (IDTs) and, separately, the basophil activation test (BAT) differentiate VIR from vancomycin-tolerant subjects.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study of vancomycin-exposed adults with and without a history of VIR. Demographics, allergy-related comorbidities, history of vancomycin exposures, and VIR characteristics were collected. IDT with vancomycin was performed. IDT dose responses EC50, IDT-related local symptoms, and BAT were compared between groups.
RESULTS: 11 VIR and 10 vancomycin-tolerant subjects were enrolled. The most reported VIR symptoms were pruritus (82%), flushing (82%), hives (46%), hives (46%), angioedema (27%), and dyspnea (19%). The IDT dose response mean EC50 was 328 μg/mL (95% CI 296, 367) in the VIR vs. 1,166 μg/mL (95% CI 1029, 1379) in the tolerant group (p<0.0001). All VIR subjects reported IDT-related local pruritus compared to 60% of tolerant subjects (p=0.0185). The %CD63+ basophils were consistently <2%, without significant differences between groups (p < 0.54).
CONCLUSIONS: Variations in skin test methodologies could help identify other IDR mechanisms beyond IgE. This skin test protocol holds the potential for identifying VIR, particularly in cases where patients have received multiple drugs while BAT is insufficient. Future studies will validate and delineate its predictive value, assessing the risk of VIR.

Background. Parthenium hysterophorus pollen induces chronic clinical conditions such as allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma. Among the plethora of proteins in the pollens, only few were reported to induce allergy. Currently sensitization to P. hysterophorus pollen allergen is diagnosed by skin prick test (SPT) using the entire pollen extract instead of using the specific allergen. Methods. In P. hysterophorus sensitized patients, SPT was done using the crude pollen extract, 40 kDa allergenic pollen protein and two commercially synthesized allergen epitopes (17 and 24) of P. hysterophorus. Dot-blot of allergen epitopes was done using P. hysterophorus sensitized sera. Crude pollen extract (1, 1.25, 2.5, 5 and 10 µg/mL), 40 kDa allergenic protein (3 µg/mL), and allergen epitopes (3µg/mL) were used to perform Basophil Activation Test (BAT). Results. Crude pollen extract at 2.5, 5, 10 μg/mL and 40 kDa allergenic protein at 3μg/mL concentrations induced wheal and flare reaction by around 15 minutes, whereas commercially synthesized allergen epitopes at 3μg/mL induced wheal and flare reactions in less than 10 minutes. Allergen epitopes (3 µg/mL) revealed strong reactivity with sensitized patient\'s IgE in dot-blot analysis. Basophil activation Test using crude pollen extract (2.5, 5, 10 µg/mL), 40 kDa allergenic protein (3 µg/mL), and allergenic epitopes (3µg/mL) indicated significant basophil activation (as measured by CD63 expression) in sensitized patients. Conclusions. The 40 kDa allergenic protein and its allergenic epitopes (17 and 24) induced phenotypic and cellular immune responses in P. hysterophorus sensitized individuals. The tested allergenic epitopes (17 and 24) induced faster wheal and flare reactions in comparison with the crude extract and the 40 kDa allergenic protein. The novel 40kDa allergenic protein and its allergen epitopes identified here may be useful for the development of component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) while also serving as a potential therapeutic lead for desensitization treatment for P. hysterophorus pollen induced allergy.

UNASSIGNED: Background. In diagnosing insect venom allergy and making immunotherapy decisions, clinical history, skin tests, and specific serum IgE levels are commonly utilized. This study aims to emphasize the clinical significance of using the basophil activation test in accurately identifying sensitivities in individuals with insect venom allergy and to compare its effectiveness with other testing methods. Methods. This study included a total of 43 patients, who experienced at least one systemic allergic reaction following insect stings and were deemed suitable for immunotherapy.Basophil activation test, specific serum IgE levels, and skin prick test results utilized in making immunotherapy treatment decisions were recorded. Results. Our study determined that the overall clinical sensitivities of the basophil activation test (BAT), specific serum IgE (spIgE), and skin prick test (SPT) for apis mellifera were 95.5%, 95.7%, and 48.4% respectively, while for vespula vulgaris, they were 83.3%, 100%, and 33.3%. Based on these results, the prediction of systemic reactions to bee stings is ordered as spIgE > BAT > SPT. Additionally, early-stage skin prick tests showed a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% at a cut-off value of 1.5 mm, and 33% sensitivity and 83% specificity at 2.5 mm. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the basophil activation test (BAT) can provide a high positive predictive value in immunotherapy treatment decisions and offer significant insights in clinical practices.

Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS) is a delayed allergic reaction triggered by IgE antibodies targeting galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-gal), prevalent in red meat. Its global significance has increased, with over 450,000 estimated cases in the United States alone. AGS is linked to tick bites, causing sensitization and elevated α-gal specific IgE levels. However, the precise mechanisms and tick intrinsic factors contributing to AGS development post-tick bites remain unclear. This study aims to characterize the alpha-gal conjugated lipid antigens in Amblyomma americanum (Am. americanum) salivary glands and saliva. Nanospray ionization mass spectrometry (NSI-MS) analysis revealed the identification of α-gal bound lipid antigens in Am. americanum saliva. Additionally, the activation of basophils by extracted alpha-gal bound lipids and proteins provides evidence of their antigenic capabilities.

UNASSIGNED: Oral food challenges are commonly used when there is uncertainty based on a clinical history as to whether a food allergy exists and to assess whether a food allergy has been outgrown.
UNASSIGNED: A narrative review was performed, synthesizing available evidence in the literature.
UNASSIGNED: Because food challenges are generally multi-hour procedures that carry the risk for potentially severe allergic reactions, careful patient selection is important. Allergy tests can provide additional supportive information to guide decision-making but do not have sufficient diagnostic accuracy to replace food challenges in most circumstances.
UNASSIGNED: Clinical history provides important clues with regard to the likelihood that a reaction may occur and should be combined with patient and family preferences and allergy test results when making decisions about pursuing food challenges.

Upon first exposure to cetuximab, hypersensitivity reactions can occur. We aimed to assess the utility of the basophil activation test (BAT) to alpha-gal and cetuximab for predicting severe reactions. We prospectively recruited 38 patients and evaluated sIgE to alpha-gal in all patients before the first application of cetuximab. In all alpha-gal-sensitized patients, we evaluated skin tests to meat extracts, gelatine, and cetuximab and performed BAT with alpha-gal and cetuximab. In 24% (9/38) of patients, sIgE to alpha-gal was >0.10 kUA/L, and 8/9 reacted to the cetuximab. Basophil activation tests with alpha-gal were positive in all sensitized patients and were higher in those with severe reactions (18.3% in grade 4 [n = 4] vs. 1.8% in grade 2 [n = 3] or no reaction [n = 1] at 3.3 ng/mL of alpha-gal; p = 0.03). All patients with severe grade 4 reactions had a positive CD63 BAT response to cetuximab compared to patients with moderate or no reaction, who all had negative BAT (57.7% vs. 0.9% at 500 µg/mL, 63.2% vs. 4.1% at 100 µg/mL, 58.2% vs. 2.7% at 10 µg/mL, and 32.1% vs. 3.3% at 1 µg/mL of cetuximab, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). In summary, before initiating cetuximab treatment, sIgE to alpha-gal should be assessed in all patients. To predict the severity of the reaction and to assess the risk of cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis, we should perform BATs with alpha-gal or more discriminative BATs with cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: The peanut basophil activation test (BAT) has demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy with heparinized blood, but its clinical utility is limited by the short stability of samples stored in this anticoagulant.
OBJECTIVE: Using EDTA anticoagulated blood, these investigations determined if Peanut BAT sample stability can be extended to 2 days, the minimum stability requirement for diagnostic tests currently offered through American reference laboratories.
METHODS: Peanut non-allergic control (NAC), peanut IgE sensitized (PS), and peanut allergic (PA) children aged 6 months through 17 years were recruited from members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California. EDTA anti-coagulated blood samples were collected from participants, shipped to a centralized laboratory, and stored at 4oC for peanut BAT testing 1 and 2 days later.
RESULTS: Peanut BAT results for 23 unblinded participants were used to establish sample rejection and interpretation criteria that were subsequently validated in a prospective double-blind study involving 112 additional children (39-NAC, 36-PS, 37-PA). Of 105 blinded blood samples tested on each study day, 88 (84%) day-1 and 90 (86%) day-2 peanut BAT results were considered interpretable, with diagnostic accuracies of 95.5% and 94.4%, respectively. Moreover, all interpretable PA results were considered positive (100% sensitivity).
CONCLUSIONS: Using EDTA anti-coagulated blood samples collected remotely, 1 and 2 days before testing, study results highlight the favorable diagnostic performance characteristics of the peanut BAT and provide further evidence that the test could be readily operationalized for clinical use by interested commercial reference laboratories.

Pollen from common ragweed is an important allergen source worldwide and especially in western and southern Romania. More than 100 million patients suffer from symptoms of respiratory allergy (e.g., rhinitis, asthma) to ragweed pollen. Among the eleven characterized allergens, Amb a 6 is a non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP). nsLTPs are structurally stable proteins in pollen and food from different unrelated plants capable of inducing severe reactions. The goal of this study was to produce Amb a 6 as a recombinant and structurally folded protein (rAmb a 6) and to characterize its physicochemical and immunological features. rAmb a 6 was expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells as a secreted protein and characterized by mass spectrometry and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy regarding molecular mass and fold, respectively. The IgE-binding frequency towards the purified protein was evaluated using sera from 150 clinically well-characterized ragweed-allergic patients. The allergenic activities of rAmb a 6 and the nsLTP from the weed Parietaria judaica (Par j 2) were evaluated in basophil activation assays. rAmb a 6-specific IgE reactivity was associated with clinical features. Pure rAmb a 6 was obtained by insect cell expression. Its deduced molecular weight corresponded to that determined by mass spectrometry (i.e., 10,963 Da). rAmb a 6 formed oligomers as determined by SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions. According to multiple sequence comparisons, Amb a 6 was a distinct nsLTP with less than 40% sequence identity to currently known plant nsLTP allergens, except for nsLTP from Helianthus (i.e., 52%). rAmb a 6 is an important ragweed allergen recognized by 30% of ragweed pollen allergic patients. For certain patients, rAmb a 6-specific IgE levels were higher than those specific for the major ragweed allergen Amb a 1 and analysis also showed a higher allergenic activity in the basophil activation test. rAmb a 6-positive patients suffered mainly from respiratory symptoms. The assumption that Amb a 6 is a source-specific ragweed allergen is supported by the finding that none of the patients showing rAmb a 6-induced basophil activation reacted with Par j 2 and only one rAmb a 6-sensitized patient had a history of plant food allergy. Immunization of rabbits with rAmb a 6 induced IgG antibodies which strongly inhibited IgE binding to rAmb a 6. Our results demonstrate that Amb a 6 is an important source-specific ragweed pollen allergen that should be considered for diagnosis and allergen-specific immunotherapy of ragweed pollen allergy.

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy remains a widely recognized and widely used method for the treatment of selected allergic diseases. Currently, according to the European Academy Of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) guidelines, venom immunotherapy (VIT) may be considered for patients over 60. Nevertheless, no separate studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of this therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of VIT against wasp allergens in an ultra-rush protocol for older patients compared to young patients.
METHODS: Among the 113 patients included in this study, 51 were older than 60 years (Group A), and 62 formed the control \"young group\" (age range: 18-35 years). All patients were desensitized to wasp venom using the ultra-rush protocol according to Muller and aqueous solutions of vaccines containing wasp venom. A basophil activation test (Basotest, Orpegen Pharma, Germany) and intracutaneous tests with dilutions of wasp allergen and specific IgE to extract wasp venom were performed at the start and after six months of VIT. The safety of VIT was assessed on the basis of the international Mueller scale.
RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients with confirmed wasp allergies completed six months of VIT: 51 participants over 60 years of age (Group A) and 60 young people (Group B). No systemic adverse reactions were observed during the VIT induction phase. However, large local reactions were noted in 17% of older patients and 20% of young patients at a similar level (p > 0.05). During maintenance VIT, two mild grade I systemic reactions were confirmed in young patients. These symptoms resolved spontaneously. There were no such reactions in older patients. The effectiveness of VIT was tested using BAT. There was a statistically significant reduction in CD63 reactivity in 86% of patients in Group A, and a comparable and substantial decrease in 84% of young patients in Group B. According to the BAT test, the mean reductions in the area under the curve (AUC) after six months of VIT were significant (p < 0.05) and comparable between Groups A and B: -6.52 vs. 7.21.
CONCLUSIONS: VIT against wasp venom is safe and effective in short-term observation, and is comparable to that used for young patients.