{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: The role of basophil activation test in venom ımmunotherapy: comparative evaluation with specific IgE and skin prick tests, ınnovative approaches.
{Author}: Kokcu Karadag SI;Özen Çökelez S;Bekar Çepniler E;Abdullayev E;Terzi O;Özçeker D;Sancak R;Yıldıran A;
{Journal}: Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol
{Volume}: 0
{Issue}: 0
{Year}: 2024 Jul 31
暂无{DOI}: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.353
{Abstract}: <B>UNASSIGNED: </B>Background. In diagnosing insect venom allergy and making immunotherapy decisions, clinical history, skin tests, and specific serum IgE levels are commonly utilized. This study aims to emphasize the clinical significance of using the basophil activation test in accurately identifying sensitivities in individuals with insect venom allergy and to compare its effectiveness with other testing methods. Methods. This study included a total of 43 patients, who experienced at least one systemic allergic reaction following insect stings and were deemed suitable for immunotherapy.Basophil activation test, specific serum IgE levels, and skin prick test results utilized in making immunotherapy treatment decisions were recorded. Results. Our study determined that the overall clinical sensitivities of the basophil activation test (BAT), specific serum IgE (spIgE), and skin prick test (SPT) for apis mellifera were 95.5%, 95.7%, and 48.4% respectively, while for vespula vulgaris, they were 83.3%, 100%, and 33.3%. Based on these results, the prediction of systemic reactions to bee stings is ordered as spIgE > BAT > SPT. Additionally, early-stage skin prick tests showed a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 50% at a cut-off value of 1.5 mm, and 33% sensitivity and 83% specificity at 2.5 mm. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the basophil activation test (BAT) can provide a high positive predictive value in immunotherapy treatment decisions and offer significant insights in clinical practices.