aztreonam

氨曲南
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:青霉素过敏是住院患者中最常见的药物过敏。传统上,在我们的机构经验性抗生素指南中,氨曲南被推荐用于标记有青霉素过敏(PLWPA)的患者.由于2022年12月全球氨曲南短缺,抗菌药物管理部门推荐头孢他啶作为替代品。关于头孢他啶在PLWPA中的安全性的实际数据很少。因此,我们评估了头孢他啶用于PLWPA的耐受性结果.
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究比较了新加坡总医院接受氨曲南(2022年10月至2022年12月)或头孢他啶(2022年12月至2023年2月)的PLWPA。根据青霉素过敏史,根据患者的过敏反应(AR)风险对患者进行分层。AR的严重程度基于Delphi研究分级系统。主要结果是开始使用氨曲南或头孢他啶后发生AR。继发性耐受性结果包括肝毒性和神经毒性。
    结果:研究中有168例患者;69例为男性(41.1%),中位年龄为69岁(四分位距:59-76岁)。两组的AR发生率在统计学上相似:氨曲南组102例患者中有1例(0.98%),头孢他啶组66例患者中有2例(3.03%)(P=0.33)。氨曲南组中的患者被认为处于患有AR的中等风险并且出现局部皮疹(1级)。头孢他啶臂中的两名患者被认为处于AR的高风险并且发生局部皮肤反应(1级)。在1例服用氨曲南的患者中观察到肝毒性。头孢他啶组中没有患者出现不良事件。
    结论:头孢他啶在PLWPA中与氨曲南相比似乎具有更好的耐受性和更便宜,并作为抗菌药物管理策略,以节省广谱抗生素的使用。
    OBJECTIVE: Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity.
    RESULTS: There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CR-Kp)负担的增加,包括与医疗保健相关的高感染率,治疗失败,和死亡率,攻击这种多重耐药病原体的良好治疗策略是当前医学实践的主要目标之一,因此需要使用新型抗生素或新的药物组合.
    目的:我们回顾了2023年10月至2024年1月在“AgrippaIonescu”临床急诊医院接受治疗的7例患者的临床和微生物学结果,旨在证明头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(C/A)加氨曲南(ATM)组合对blaNDM-blaOXA-48样Kp的共同生产者的协同活性。
    方法:测试了以blaNDM和blaOXA-48为抗性机制的7种CR-Kp。包括7例用C/A+ATM治疗的患者。C/A+ATM的协同活性通过双盘扩散在所有七个分离株中得到证实。抵抗机制,如KPC,VIM,OXA-48,NDM,IMP,和CTX-M通过免疫层析进行评估。
    结果:使用协同组合C/A+ATM平均治疗9天,所有患者均达到临床康复,五个实现了微生物回收。
    结论:随着罗马尼亚Kp中blaOXA-48和blaNDM的出现,C/A和ATM的组合可能是一个有前途的治疗选择。
    With the increasing burden of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-Kp), including high rates of healthcare-associated infections, treatment failure, and mortality, a good therapeutic strategy for attacking this multi-resistant pathogen is one of the main goals in current medical practice and necessitates the use of novel antibiotics or new drug combinations.
    OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the clinical and microbiological outcomes of seven patients treated at the \"Agrippa Ionescu\" Clinical Emergency Hospital between October 2023 and January 2024, aiming to demonstrate the synergistic activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam (C/A) plus aztreonam (ATM) combination against the co-producers of blaNDM + blaOXA-48-like CR-Kp.
    METHODS: Seven CR-Kp with blaNDM and blaOXA-48 as resistance mechanisms were tested. Seven patients treated with C/A + ATM were included. The synergistic activity of C/A + ATM was proven through double-disk diffusion in all seven isolates. Resistance mechanisms like KPC, VIM, OXA-48, NDM, IMP, and CTX-M were assessed through immunochromatography.
    RESULTS: With a mean of nine days of treatment with the synergistic combination C/A + ATM, all patients achieved clinical recovery, and five achieved microbiological recovery.
    CONCLUSIONS: With the emerging co-occurrence of blaOXA-48 and blaNDM among Kp in Romania, the combination of C/A and ATM could be a promising therapeutic option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一名40多岁的2型糖尿病患者在另一家医院进行脑脊液(CSF)渗漏修复后,持续存在6个月的右侧水样鼻涕,由于反复出现的症状,促使他来我们这里。影像学检查显示,中斜坡的CSF泄漏已进行了内窥镜内窥镜CSF泄漏修复。遗憾的是,他出现了由多重耐药(MDR)肺炎克雷伯菌引起的术后脑膜炎。由于病原体对常规药物的耐药性和缺乏科学证据,因此处理这一复杂病例是一项具有挑战性的任务。我们启动了头孢他啶的文化指导联合治疗方案,阿维巴坦,氨曲南和替加环素.这一决定源于细致的文献综述,并在测试该生物体时观察到抗生素协同作用。经过4周的警惕治疗,患者的症状明显改善,和CSF培养物是无菌的。我们提出了有效应对和管理术后MDR细菌性脑膜炎的挑战性实例的方法。
    A man in his 40s with type 2 diabetes mellitus had persistent right-sided watery nasal discharge for 6 months following cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak repair at another hospital, prompting his visit to us due to recurring symptoms. Imaging revealed a CSF leak from the mid-clivus for which revision endoscopic CSF leak repair was done. Regrettably, he developed postoperative meningitis caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniaeManaging this complex case was a challenging task due to the pathogen\'s resistance to conventional drugs and the scarcity of scientific evidence. We initiated a culture-guided combination regimen with ceftazidime, avibactam, aztreonam and tigecycline. This decision stemmed from meticulous literature review and observed antibiotic synergy while testing for this organism.After 4 weeks of vigilant treatment, the patient\'s symptoms improved significantly, and CSF cultures were sterile. We present our approach to effectively confront and manage a challenging instance of postoperative MDR bacterial meningitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于革兰氏阴性杆菌的多药耐药性而难以获得有效的抗生素治疗,这迫使人们探索现有抗生素之间协同相互作用的新可能性。
    进行了一项分析,以评估两种抗生素治疗方案在治疗由产生碳青霉烯酶(MBL)的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株引起的感染中的功效。考虑了两个患者组:A组-感染治疗涉及头孢他啶-阿维巴坦联合氨曲南的应用的个体。B组包括接受替代抗生素治疗方案的患者。
    在接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南治疗方案的组中,与替代抗生素组合相比,在治疗过程中统计学上较低的死亡率和对给药治疗更快的临床反应是明显的.
    获得的结果可能适用于进行的常规体外测定,并为通过头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南之间的协同作用潜在利用抗生素治疗的积极作用提供有价值的指导。选择用于治疗肺炎克雷伯菌引起的侵袭性感染的抗生素会影响最终的治疗结果。
    UNASSIGNED: The difficulties in attaining effective antibiotic therapy arising from the multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacilli compel the exploration of new possibilities for synergistic interactions among existing antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: An analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of two antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing carbapenemases (MBL). Two patient groups were considered: Group A - individuals in whom the treatment of infection involved the application of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with aztreonam. Group B comprised patients subjected to an alternative antibiotic therapy regimen.
    UNASSIGNED: In the group subjected to the treatment regimen involving ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, as compared to alternative antibiotic combinations, a statistically lower mortality rate during the course of treatment and a faster clinical response to the administered therapy were evident.
    UNASSIGNED: The results obtained may be applicable to routine in vitro assays performed and serve as valuable guidance for the potential utilization of the positive effect of antibiotic therapy through the synergy between ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. The selection of antibiotics employed in the therapy of invasive infections caused by K. pneumoniae influences the ultimate treatment outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在所有病因性医院获得性感染因素中,产生新德里金属-β-内酰胺酶(KP-NDM)的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株属于具有最有效的抗生素耐药机制的病原体。临床指南建议使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合氨曲南(CZAAT)作为产生NDM的肠杆菌的首选选择。然而,对此类治疗方案的观察数量有限.这项回顾性研究报告了在波兰的一个中心接受CZAAT治疗的23例KP-NDM医院获得性感染患者的临床和微生物学结果。
    方法:分离株来自尿液,肺,血,腹膜腔,伤口,和扁桃体周围脓肿。在微生物分析中,用于病原体鉴定的质谱,聚合酶链反应,或用于检测碳青霉烯酶的免疫层析法,以及VITEK-2系统,肉汤微量稀释,采用琼脂微量稀释法进行抗菌药物敏感性试验,取决于病原体的性质。肾功能正常的患者每8小时静脉内(IV)给予CZA2.5g,氨曲南每8小时给药2g。当肾功能降低时,可以修改这种剂量。
    结果:KP-NDM在所有病例中均被根除。四名患者(17.4%)死亡:其中三人患有肿瘤性疾病,和一个-COVID-19感染。
    结论:CZA+AT联合治疗KP-NDM感染是一种安全有效的治疗方法,在临床和微生物学水平。所有化合物的协同作用导致CZA+AT的临床功效与体外敏感性测试的结果之间的良好一致性。
    OBJECTIVE: Amongst all etiologic hospital-acquired infection factors, K. pneumoniae strains producing New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (KP-NDM) belong to pathogens with the most effective antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Clinical guidelines recommend using ceftazidime/avibactam with aztreonam (CZA + AT) as the preferred option for NDM-producing Enterobacterales. However, the number of observations on such treatment regimen is limited. This retrospective study reports the clinical and microbiological outcomes of 23 patients with KP-NDM hospital-acquired infection treated with CZA + AT at a single center in Poland.
    METHODS: The isolates were derived from the urine, lungs, blood, peritoneal cavity, wounds, and peritonsillar abscess. In microbiological analysis, mass spectrometry for pathogen identification, polymerase chain reaction, or an immunochromatographic assay for detection of carbapenemase, as well as VITEK-2 system, broth microdilution, and microdilution in agar method for antimicrobial susceptibility tests were used, depending of the pathogens\' nature. CZA was administered intravenously (IV) at 2.5 g every eight hours in patients with normal kidney function, and aztreonam was administered at 2 g every eight hours IV. Such dosage was modified when renal function was reduced.
    RESULTS: KP-NDM was eradicated in all cases. Four patients (17.4%) died: three of them had a neoplastic disease, and one - a COVID-19 infection.
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination of CZA + AT is a safe and effective therapy for infections caused by KP-NDM, both at the clinical and microbiological levels. The synergistic action of all compounds resulted in a good agreement between the clinical efficacy of CZA + AT and the results of in vitro susceptibility testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)的患病率近年来呈上升趋势。中国儿科传染病监测(ISPED)显示,2022年,其对美罗培南的耐药率为18.5%。然而,关于新生儿CRKP感染治疗的现有数据有限.在这项研究中,我们介绍一例早产儿感染产OXA-48肺炎克雷伯菌的病例.联合药敏试验显示头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)之间有显著的协同作用,和氨曲南(ATM)。CAZ-AVI组合成功治疗了感染,ATM,和磷霉素.该病例是中国首次报道的由产OXA-48肺炎克雷伯菌引起的早产儿败血症。我们研究的目的是评估联合治疗早产儿CRKP感染的有效性和安全性。我们希望这项研究的结果将为临床医生的治疗方法提供有价值的见解。
    The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) has been increasing in recent years. Chinese Infectious Disease Surveillance of Pediatrics (ISPED) showed that in 2022, its resistance rate to meropenem was 18.5%. However, there is limited data available on the treatment of CRKP infection in neonates. In this study, we present a case involving a premature infant infected with OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. The combined susceptibility test revealed a significant synergistic effect between ceftazidime-avibactam(CAZ-AVI), and aztreonam(ATM). The infection was successfully treated with a combination of CAZ-AVI, ATM, and fosfomycin. This case represents the first reported instance of sepsis in a premature infant caused by OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy in treating CRKP infections in premature infants. We hope that the findings of this study will provide valuable insights for clinicians in their treatment approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氨曲南-阿维巴坦(ATM-AVI)组合对大多数产生碳青霉烯酶的革兰氏阴性药物显示出有希望的有效性,然而,目前还缺乏用于临床实验室评估联合用药的标准化抗生素药敏试验(AST)方法.我们旨在评估不同的ATM-AVIAST方法。
    方法:96个特征为耐碳青霉烯的临床分离株,属于9个肠杆菌(EB;n=80)和铜绿假单胞菌(PA;n=16),包括90个碳青霉烯酶生产者和72个对CAZ-AVI和ATM均具有抗性的菌株,进行了测试。对ATM+CAZ-AVI组合进行纸盘洗脱(DE;Bio-Rad)和E-测试梯度条堆叠(SS;bioMérieux)。评估MIC测试条(MTS;Liofilchem)用于ATM-AVIMIC测定。应用EUCAST指南的ATM临床断点对结果进行了解释,并与肉汤微量稀释法进行了比较(Sensitte,Thermofisher)。
    结果:根据肉汤微量稀释法,测试了93%的EB和69%的PA对ATM-AVI敏感。ATM-AVI对EB的协同作用为95%,但PA只有17%。与SS相比,MTS方法对EB(89%/91%)和PA(94%/94%)产生了更高的分类和基本协议(CA/EA)率,其中EB率为87%/83%,PA率为81%/81%。MTS和SS产生了2和3个主要差异,分别,而两种方法各有3个非常大的差异。关于DE方法,EB的CA达到91%,PA达到81%,但是对于EB(n=6;8%)和PA(n=3;19%)观察到大量非常重大的差异。
    结论:ATM-AVI联合对高耐药临床肠杆菌菌株表现出优异的体外活性。MTS方法提供准确的ATM-AVIAST结果,而SS方法在评估ATM+CAZ-AVI组合的疗效方面可能比DE方法更好。然而,需要进一步研究以确认方法检测ATM-AVI耐药性的能力.
    BACKGROUND: Aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) combination shows promising effectiveness on most carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives, yet standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) methods for evaluating the combination in clinical laboratories is lacking. We aimed to evaluate different ATM-AVI AST approaches.
    METHODS: 96 characterized carbapenem-resistant clinical isolates belonging to 9 Enterobacterales (EB; n = 80) and P. aeruginosa (PA; n = 16) species, including 90 carbapenemase producers and 72 strains resistant to both CAZ-AVI and ATM, were tested. Paper disk elution (DE; Bio-Rad) and E-test gradient strips stacking (SS; bioMérieux) were performed for the ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. MIC Test Strip (MTS; Liofilchem) was evaluated for ATM-AVI MIC determination. Results were interpreted applying ATM clinical breakpoints of the EUCAST guidelines and compared to the broth microdilution method (Sensititre, Thermofisher).
    RESULTS: According to broth microdilution method, 93% of EB and 69% of PA were tested susceptible to ATM-AVI. The synergistic effect of ATM-AVI was of 95% for EB, but of only 17% for PA. The MTS method yielded higher categorical and essential agreement (CA/EA) rates for both EB (89%/91%) and PA (94%/94%) compared to SS, where the rates were 87%/83% for EB and 81%/81% for PA. MTS and SS yielded 2 and 3 major discrepancies, respectively, while 3 very major discrepancies each were observed for both methods. Concerning the DE method, CA reached 91% for EB and 81% for PA, but high number of very major discrepancies were observed for EB (n = 6; 8%) and for PA (n = 3; 19%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The ATM-AVI association displayed excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant clinical Enterobacterales strains. MTS method offers accurate ATM-AVI AST results, while the SS method might serve as better alternative then DE method in assessing the efficacy of ATM + CAZ-AVI combination. However, further investigation is needed to confirm the methods\' ability to detect ATM-AVI resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    产生NDM的碳青霉烯类耐药细菌感染成为临床医生面临的挑战。氨曲南和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的联合治疗是这些感染的谨慎选择。然而,目前还没有推荐一种切实可行的方法来检测氨曲南和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的协同作用.我们提出了一种测试氨曲南和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦协同作用的简单方法,并将其与参考肉汤微量稀释和其他方法进行了比较。通过CarbaR试验筛选了耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌临床分离株中是否存在NDM基因。通过肉汤微量稀释(参考方法)测试了携带NDM的分离株的氨曲南和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的协同作用,E带盘扩散,双盘扩散,和椎间盘更换方法。在新提出的方法中,MHA培养基补充有头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(对应于4μg/ml的氨曲南浓度)。然后用测试生物体的标准接种物(0.5McFarland)接种MHA培养基。将AZT圆盘(30μg)置于补充的MHA培养基上,并将培养基在37°C下孵育过夜。将补充的MHA培养基(在头孢他啶-阿维巴坦存在下)上的氨曲南区直径与标准圆盘扩散板(不含头孢他啶-阿维巴坦)的直径进行比较,并行执行。协同作用的解释是基于氨曲南区域直径的恢复(在头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的存在下)穿过CLSI敏感性断点,即,≥21mm。在37株耐碳青霉烯类NDM的分离株中,35(94.6%)对氨曲南具有抗性,并通过所提出的方法检测出协同作用呈阳性。其敏感性和特异性分别为97.14%和100%,分别。Cohen的kappa值表明参考方法与所提出的方法(κ=0.78)基本一致,但没有其他方法。该方法简单,易于解释,并显示出优异的灵敏度,特异性,并与参考方法一致。因此,该新方法可用于检测氨曲南与阿维巴坦在产NDM肠杆菌中的协同作用。
    NDM-producing carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections became a challenge for clinicians. Combination therapy of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam is a prudent choice for these infections. However, there is still no recommendation of a practically feasible method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy. We proposed a simple method for testing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy and compared it with reference broth micro-dilution and other methods. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales clinical isolates were screened for the presence of the NDM gene by the Carba R test. NDM harbouring isolates were tested for aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam synergy by broth microdilution (reference method), E strip-disc diffusion, double disc diffusion, and disc replacement methods. In the newly proposed method, the MHA medium was supplemented with ceftazidime-avibactam (corresponding to an aztreonam concentration of 4μg/ml). The MHA medium was then inoculated with the standard inoculum (0.5 McFarland) of the test organism. An AZT disc (30 μg) was placed on the supplemented MHA medium, and the medium was incubated overnight at 37°C. Aztreonam zone diameter on the supplemented MHA medium (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) was compared with that from a standard disc diffusion plate (without ceftazidime-avibactam), performed in parallel. Interpretation of synergy was based on the restoration of aztreonam zone diameter (in the presence of ceftazidime-avibactam) crossing the CLSI susceptibility breakpoint, i.e., ≥ 21 mm. Of 37 carbapenem-resistant NDM-producing isolates, 35 (94.6%) were resistant to aztreonam and tested synergy positive by the proposed method. Its sensitivity and specificity were 97.14% and 100%, respectively. Cohen\'s kappa value showed substantial agreement of the reference method with the proposed method (κ = 0.78) but no other methods. The proposed method is simple, easily interpretable, and showed excellent sensitivity, specificity, and agreement with the reference method. Therefore, the new method is feasible and reliable for testing aztreonam synergy with avibactam in NDM-producing Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:氨曲南/阿维巴坦对革兰氏阴性菌包括含有金属β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌引起的严重感染有效。虽然这种组合的效用已经在体外和临床试验中确立,这项研究的目的是通过对多重耐药大肠杆菌临床分离株进行代谢组学分析,加深我们对其活性的潜在机制的理解。
    方法:对用氨曲南和阿维巴坦处理的多药耐药大肠杆菌临床分离株内源性细菌代谢产物的时间依赖性变化进行了代谢组学分析。大肠杆菌代谢组在15分钟时进行比较,使用阿维巴坦(4mg/L)治疗后1小时和24小时,氨曲南(4毫克/升),或氨曲南(4mg/L)+阿维巴坦(4mg/L)。
    结果:药物治疗影响了326种代谢物,其幅度变化至少为2倍,其中大多数主要参与肽聚糖的生物合成,核苷酸代谢,和脂质代谢。通过氨曲南/阿维巴坦组合耗尽肽聚糖合成的原料;在三个时间点观察到核苷酸代谢物的显著下游增加和脂质的释放。
    结论:研究结果表明,与单独使用氨曲南或阿维巴坦相比,氨曲南/阿维巴坦组合可加速细菌膜结构的结构损伤,其作用是直接和持续的。通过抑制关键细胞壁前体的产生,该组合可能对细菌DNA造成损害。
    OBJECTIVE: Aztreonam/avibactam is effective against serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria including Enterobacterales harboring metallo-β-lactamases. While the utility of this combination has been established in vitro and in clinical trials, the purpose of this study is to enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanism responsible for their activities through metabolomic profiling of a multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolate.
    METHODS: Metabolomic analyses of time-dependent changes in endogenous bacterial metabolites in a clinical isolate of a multidrug-resistant E. coli treated with aztreonam and avibactam were performed. E. coli metabolomes were compared at 15 min, 1 h and 24 h following treatments with either avibactam (4 mg/L), aztreonam (4 mg/L), or aztreonam (4 mg/L) + avibactam (4 mg/L).
    RESULTS: Drug treatment affected 326 metabolites with magnitude changes of at least 2-fold, most of which are involved primarily in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, nucleotide metabolism, and lipid metabolism. The feedstocks for peptidoglycan synthesis were depleted by aztreonam/avibactam combination; a significant downstream increase in nucleotide metabolites and a release of lipids were observed at the three timepoints.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that the aztreonam/avibactam combination accelerates structural damage to the bacterial membrane structure and their actions were immediate and sustained compared to aztreonam or avibactam alone. By inhibiting the production of crucial cell wall precursors, the combination may have inflicted damages on bacterial DNA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)与各种抗菌药物联合应用对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)的体外疗效。我们选择了59个含有不同耐药机制的临床CRKP分离株。美罗培南(MEM)的最低抑制浓度(MIC),粘菌素(COL),eravacycline(ERA),阿米卡星(AK),磷霉素(FOS),和氨曲南(ATM),无论是单独还是与CZA结合,使用棋盘方法进行了测试。通过分数抑制浓度指数(FICI)和易感断点指数(SBPI)评估抗微生物剂组合的相互作用。时间-杀死曲线测定用于动态评估这些药物单独和组合形式的作用。在棋盘分析中,CZA+MEM的组合对产生KPC和不产生碳青霉烯酶的分离株显示出最高水平的协同作用,协同率为91.3%和100%,分别。紧随其后的是FOS+CZA的组合。对于产生金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的菌株,ATM+CZA显示出完全的协同作用,而MEM+CZA组合对NDM产生菌株的协同率仅为57.14%,对IMP产生菌株的协同率仅为91.67%。在时间杀伤分析中,MEM+CZA对两种产KPC-2的分离株(Y070和L70)也表现出显著的协同作用,两个不产生碳青霉烯酶的分离株(Y083和L093),和产生NDM-1的菌株L13,与对照相比,log10CFU/mL的降低超过10。对产IMP菌株Y047,ATM+CZA表现出最高的协同作用,与对照相比,log10CFU/mL降低了10.43。CZA和MEM的组合对产KPC和非产酶菌株具有良好的协同作用。其次是FOS+CZA组合。在MBL产生菌株中,ATM+CZA表现出最显著的协同作用。然而,CZA与ERA的组合,AK,和COL对测试的临床分离株显示不相关的作用。
    目的:我们的研究证实了CZA+MEM组合对产KPC和非产碳青霉烯酶菌株的疗效。对于产生金属酶的菌株,CZA+ATM表现出最显著的协同作用。此外,CZA与FOS组合时表现出显著的协同作用。这些联合疗法为CRKP感染的治疗提供了有希望的新选择。
    This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates.
    OBJECTIVE: Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号