aztreonam

氨曲南
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:青霉素过敏是住院患者中最常见的药物过敏。传统上,在我们的机构经验性抗生素指南中,氨曲南被推荐用于标记有青霉素过敏(PLWPA)的患者.由于2022年12月全球氨曲南短缺,抗菌药物管理部门推荐头孢他啶作为替代品。关于头孢他啶在PLWPA中的安全性的实际数据很少。因此,我们评估了头孢他啶用于PLWPA的耐受性结果.
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究比较了新加坡总医院接受氨曲南(2022年10月至2022年12月)或头孢他啶(2022年12月至2023年2月)的PLWPA。根据青霉素过敏史,根据患者的过敏反应(AR)风险对患者进行分层。AR的严重程度基于Delphi研究分级系统。主要结果是开始使用氨曲南或头孢他啶后发生AR。继发性耐受性结果包括肝毒性和神经毒性。
    结果:研究中有168例患者;69例为男性(41.1%),中位年龄为69岁(四分位距:59-76岁)。两组的AR发生率在统计学上相似:氨曲南组102例患者中有1例(0.98%),头孢他啶组66例患者中有2例(3.03%)(P=0.33)。氨曲南组中的患者被认为处于患有AR的中等风险并且出现局部皮疹(1级)。头孢他啶臂中的两名患者被认为处于AR的高风险并且发生局部皮肤反应(1级)。在1例服用氨曲南的患者中观察到肝毒性。头孢他啶组中没有患者出现不良事件。
    结论:头孢他啶在PLWPA中与氨曲南相比似乎具有更好的耐受性和更便宜,并作为抗菌药物管理策略,以节省广谱抗生素的使用。
    OBJECTIVE: Penicillin allergy is the most common drug allergy among hospitalized patients. Traditionally, aztreonam is recommended for patients labeled with penicillin allergy (PLWPA) in our institutional empirical antibiotic guidelines. Due to a global aztreonam shortage in December 2022, the antimicrobial stewardship unit recommended ceftazidime as a substitute. There is a paucity of real-world data on the safety profile of ceftazidime in PLWPA. Hence, we evaluated tolerability outcomes of ceftazidime use in PLWPA.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared PLWPA in Singapore General Hospital who received aztreonam (October 2022-December 2022) or ceftazidime (December 2022-February 2023). Patients were stratified according to their risk of allergic reaction (AR) based on history of penicillin allergy. The severity of AR was based on the Delphi study grading system. The primary outcome was development of AR after initiation of aztreonam or ceftazidime. The secondary tolerability outcomes include hepatotoxicity and neurotoxicity.
    RESULTS: There were 168 patients in the study; 69 were men (41.1%) and the median age was 69 years (interquartile range: 59-76 years). Incidence of AR was statistically similar in both arms: 1 of 102 patients (0.98%) in the aztreonam arm vs 2 of 66 patients (3.03%) in the ceftazidime arm (P = 0.33). The patient in the aztreonam arm was deemed at medium risk of having an AR and developed localized rashes (grade 1). Both patients in the ceftazidime arm were deemed at high risk of AR and developed localized skin reaction (grade 1). Hepatotoxicity was observed in 1 patient prescribed aztreonam. No patients in the ceftazidime arm developed adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime appears to be better tolerated and cheaper compared with aztreonam in PLWPA, and serves as an antimicrobial stewardship strategy to conserve broader-spectrum antibiotics use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细菌耐药性监测是微生物实验室的主要产出之一,其结果是抗菌药物管理(AMS)的重要组成部分。在这项研究中,测试了特定细菌对所选抗菌药物的敏感性。测试了从2017-2021年ICU患者的临床有效样本中获得的90种关键优先病原体的独特分离株的敏感性。其中50%符合难以治疗的耐药性(DTR)标准,50%对定义中包含的所有抗生素敏感。10个肠杆菌菌株符合DTR标准,和2(20%)对粘菌素(COL)具有抗性,2(20%)至头孢地洛(FCR),7(70%)对亚胺培南/西司他丁/来巴坦(I/R),3(30%)对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAT)和5(50%)对磷霉素(FOS)。对于肠杆菌,我们还测试了还没有断点的氨曲南/阿维巴坦(AZA)。观察到的AZA的最高MIC为1mg/l,易感队列和DTR队列中的MIC范围为0.032-0.064mg/l(包括。B类β-内酰胺酶生产者)为0.064-1毫克/升。2株(13.3%)铜绿假单胞菌(15株DTR)对COL,1(6.7%)至FCR,13(86.7%)到I/R,5(33.3%)的CAT,头孢洛赞/他唑巴坦为5(33.3%)。所有具有DTR的鲍曼不动杆菌均对COL和FCR敏感,同时对I/R和氨苄西林/舒巴坦耐药。新的抗微生物剂对DTR不是100%有效的。因此,有必要对这些抗生素进行药敏试验,使用数据进行监视(包括本地监视)并符合AMS标准。
    Bacterial resistance surveillance is one of the main outputs of microbiological laboratories and its results are important part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). In this study, the susceptibility of specific bacteria to selected antimicrobial agents was tested. The susceptibility of 90 unique isolates of pathogens of critical priority obtained from clinically valid samples of ICU patients in 2017-2021 was tested. 50% of these fulfilled difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) criteria and 50% were susceptible to all antibiotics included in the definition. 10 Enterobacterales strains met DTR criteria, and 2 (20%) were resistant to colistin (COL), 2 (20%) to cefiderocol (FCR), 7 (70%) to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (I/R), 3 (30%) to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAT) and 5 (50%) to fosfomycin (FOS). For Enterobacterales we also tested aztreonam/avibactam (AZA) for which there are no breakpoints yet. The highest MIC of AZA observed was 1 mg/l, MIC range in the susceptible cohort was 0.032-0.064 mg/l and in the DTR cohort (incl. class B beta-lactamase producers) it was 0.064-1 mg/l. Two (13.3%) isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (15 DTR strains) were resistant to COL, 1 (6.7%) to FCR, 13 (86.7%) to I/R, 5 (33.3%) to CAT, and 5 (33.3%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam. All isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii with DTR were susceptible to COL and FCR, and at the same time resistant to I/R and ampicillin/sulbactam. New antimicrobial agents are not 100% effective against DTR. Therefore, it is necessary to perform susceptibility testing of these antibiotics, use the data for surveillance (including local surveillance) and conform to AMS standards.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is associated with high mortality in critically ill patients, with limited treatment options. This study aims to compare clinical response, microbiological response, and mortality in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam with or without aztreonam (CAZ-AVI + AZT) and colistin or polymyxin B (polymyxins) in CRE infections.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center prospective observational study included adult patients with CRE infections treated with CAZ-AVI+AZT or polymyxins between January 2022 and December 2022 at a Tertiary Care Medical Center in India. The clinical response, microbiological response, and mortality were compared between the two groups using a Cox multivariate regression model adjusted for the baseline SOFA score and comorbidities.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 89 patients were enrolled, with 59 (66%) patients receiving CAZ-AVI + AZT and 30 receiving polymyxins. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. The Cox multivariate regression analysis showed a statistically significant difference in clinical failure on day 14 with the CAZ-AVI + AZT group vs polymyxins (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.95, p = 0.018). There was no difference in microbiological failure (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.66-1.77, p = 0.76), microbiological relapse (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.36-3.02, p = 0.62), and hospital mortality (HR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.75-1.43, p = 0.796) between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam with or without aztreonam for CRE infections associated with a better clinical response compared with polymyxins monotherapy but without any difference in microbiological response or mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Vijayakumar M, Selvam V, Renuka MK, Rajagopalan RE. The Comparative Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxins for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(12):923-929.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产生金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的肠杆菌在世界范围内正在增加。我们的目的是描述临床特征,MBL肠杆菌感染的治疗和结果。
    方法:在比萨大学医院进行的前瞻性观察性研究(2019年1月至2022年10月),包括产生MBL的肠杆菌感染的患者。主要结果指标是30天死亡率。进行多变量Cox回归分析以确定与30天死亡率相关的因素。调整后的危险比(AHR)(95%置信区间,CI)进行了计算。
    结果:343例患者包括:15例产生VIM和328例产生NDM的肠杆菌感染。总的来说,199(58%)是血流感染,60例(17.5%)医院获得性/呼吸机相关肺炎,60(17.5%)复杂的尿路感染,13例(3.8%)腹腔内感染,11例(3.2%)皮肤和软组织感染。30天死亡率为29.7%。32例患者未接受体外活性抗生素治疗,215/343(62.7%)接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)加氨曲南(ATM),33/343(9.6%)含头孢地洛的方案,26/343(7.6%)含粘菌素的方案和37(10.8%)其他活性抗生素。在多变量分析中,感染性休克(aHR3.57,95%CI2.05-6.23,p<0.001)和年龄(aHR1.05,95%CI1.03-1.08,p<0.001)与30天死亡率独立相关,而感染后48小时内的体外积极抗生素治疗(aHR0.48,95%CI0.26-0.8,p=0.007)和来源控制(aHR0.43,95%CI0.26-0.72,p=0.001)是保护因素。敏感性分析显示,与黏菌素相比,CZA加ATM与30天死亡率降低独立相关(aHR0.39,95%CI0.18-0.86,p=0.019)。倾向得分分析证实了这些发现。
    结论:MBL-CRE感染与高30天死亡率相关。产MBL肠杆菌感染的患者应接受早期积极的抗生素治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are increasing worldwide. Our aim was to describe clinical features, treatments, and outcomes of infections by MBL-Enterobacterales.
    METHODS: A prospective observational study conducted in the Pisa University Hospital (January 2019 to October 2022) included patients with MBL-producing Enterobacterales infections. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day mortality rate. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with that mortality rate, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
    RESULTS: The study\'s 343 patients included 15 with Verona integron-encoded MBL (VIM)- and 328 with New Delhi MBL (NDM)-producing Enterobacterales infections; there were 199 patients (58%) with bloodstream infections, 60 (17.5%) with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, 60 (17.5%) with complicated urinary tract infections, 13 (3.8%) with intra-abdominal infections, and 11 (3.2%) with skin and soft-tissue infections. The 30-day mortality rate was 29.7%. Of 343 patients, 32 did not receive in vitro active antibiotic therapy, 215 (62.7%) received ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam, 33 (9.6%) received cefiderocol-containing regimens, 26 (7.6%) received colistin-containing regimens, and 37 (10.8%) received other active antibiotics. On multivariable analysis, septic shock (aHR, 3.57 [95% CI, 2.05-6.23]; P < .001) and age (1.05 [1.03-1.08]; P < .001) were independently associated with the 30-day mortality rate, while in vitro active antibiotic therapy within 48 hours after infection (0.48 [.26-.8]; P = .007) and source control (0.43 [.26-.72]; P = .001) were protective factors. Sensitivity analysis showed that ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam, compared with colistin, was independently associated with a reduced 30-day mortality rate (aHR, 0.39 [95% CI, .18-.86]; P = .02). Propensity score analyses confirmed these findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: MBL-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections are associated with high 30-day mortality rates. Patients with MBL-producing Enterobacterales infections should receive early active antibiotic therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:EUCAST在2020年提出的抗菌药物敏感性类别的新定义要求定义标准和高剂量的抗生素。对于可注射的β-内酰胺,标准和高剂量仅被提议用于短期输注方案.
    目的:评估长期输注(PI)和连续输注(CI)的β-内酰胺类药物的剂量。
    方法:对7种可注射β-内酰胺:氨曲南,头孢吡肟,头孢噻肟,头孢西丁,头孢他啶,哌拉西林和替莫西林.基于短输注的各种剂量方案,在虚拟患者中模拟PIorCI。根据参照群体PK模型获得药代动力学(PK)谱和PTA,以及EUCAST提出的PK/药效学靶标和MIC断点。与达到断点的推荐剂量相似的PTA值相关的替代剂量方案被认为是可接受的。
    结果:大多数EUCAST短剂量给药方案均证实了足够的PTA。基于PI(3至4小时)或CI的总共9个标准剂量和14个高剂量被确定为替代品。头孢吡肟和氨曲南,对于假单胞菌引起的感染,只有PI和CI方案才能达到可接受的PTA。:头孢吡肟的2gq8h为4h的PI或6g/24hCI;氨曲南的2gq6h为3h的PI或6g/24hCI。
    结论:这些替代标准和高剂量方案有望提供与新的EUCAST敏感性类别和相关MIC断点定义相容的抗生素暴露。然而,进一步的临床评估是必要的。
    The new definitions of antimicrobial susceptibility categories proposed by EUCAST in 2020 require the definition of standard and high dosages of antibiotic. For injectable β-lactams, standard and high dosages have been proposed for short-infusion regimens only.
    To evaluate dosages for β-lactams administered by prolonged infusion (PI) and continuous infusion (CI).
    Monte Carlo simulations were performed for seven injectable β-lactams: aztreonam, cefepime, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, piperacillin and temocillin. Various dosage regimens based on short infusion, PI or CI were simulated in virtual patients. Pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and PTAs were obtained based on reference population PK models, as well as PK/pharmacodynamic targets and MIC breakpoints proposed by EUCAST. Alternative dosage regimens associated with PTA values similar to those of recommended dosages up to the breakpoints were considered acceptable.
    Adequate PTAs were confirmed for most EUCAST short-infusion dosage regimens. A total of 9 standard and 14 high dosages based on PI (3 to 4 h) or CI were identified as alternatives. For cefepime and aztreonam, only PI and CI regimens could achieve acceptable PTAs for infections caused by Pseudomonas spp.: 2 g q8h as PI of 4 h or 6 g/24 h CI for cefepime; 2 g q6h as PI of 3 h or 6 g/24 h CI for aztreonam.
    These alternative standard and high dosage regimens are expected to provide antibiotic exposure compatible with new EUCAST definitions of susceptibility categories and associated MIC breakpoints. However, further clinical evaluation is necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏由产生新德里金属β-内酰胺酶(NDM-Kp)的肺炎克雷伯菌引起的感染的老年患者的真实结果数据。我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,招募了意大利高流行地区在24个月期间因NDM-Kp感染住院的33名连续成年患者(平均年龄77.4岁;男性48.5%;平均Charlson合并症指数-CCI5.9)。78.8%的患者入住内科病房。45.4%的患者有血流感染(BSI),39.4%尿路感染(UTI)无BSI,9.1%的呼吸道感染和6.1%的腹腔内感染。93.9%有直肠定植。为36.4%的病例提供了足够的确定性抗生素治疗(主要由氨曲南加头孢他啶/阿维巴坦代表)。接受充分治疗的患者的平均年龄和CCI显着低于未接受充分治疗的患者(71.2岁vs80.9岁,p=0.041,和4.6对6.7,p=0.040)。经过充分治疗的患者的平均住院时间明显更高(28天vs15天,p=0.016)。充分和不充分治疗的患者的总体30天生存率分别为83.3%和57.1%。分别:这种差异没有统计学意义。存活30天的22例患者的平均年龄和CCI低于死亡的11例患者(73.7vs84.8岁,p=0.003,和5.3vs7.2,p=0.049)。12名幸存者接受了不充分的治疗:8/12患有UTI。在30天内死亡的9名患者中,有6名没有得到充分治疗,微生物诊断前死亡.我们的研究提供了有关因NDM-Kp引起的感染而住院的老年人和多患患者的预后的真实数据。有必要进行更大样本量的进一步研究。
    Real-life outcomes data for elderly patients with infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae producing New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM-Kp) are lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study enrolling 33 consecutive adult patients (mean age 77.4 years; 48.5% males; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index-CCI 5.9) hospitalized for NDM-Kp infections during a 24-month period in an Italian highly endemic area. 78.8% were admitted to Internal Medicine ward. 45.4% of patients had bloodstream infections (BSI), 39.4% urinary tract infections (UTI) without BSI, 9.1% respiratory tract infections and 6.1% intra-abdominal infections. 93.9% had rectal colonization.Adequate definitive antibiotic therapy (mainly represented by aztreonam plus ceftazidime/avibactam) was provided to 36.4% of cases. Mean age and CCI of patients adequately treated were significantly lower than those inadequately treated (71.2 vs 80.9 years, p = 0.041, and 4.6 vs 6.7, p = 0.040, respectively). Patients adequately treated had a mean hospitalization length significantly higher (28 vs 15 days, p = 0.016). The overall 30-day survival rate of patients adequately and inadequately treated was 83.3% and 57.1%, respectively: this difference was not statistically significant. Mean age and CCI of 22 patients who survived at 30 days were lower than those of 11 patients who died (73.7 vs 84.8 years, p = 0.003, and 5.3 vs 7.2, p = 0.049, respectively). Twelve survivors received an inadequate therapy: 8/12 had UTI. Six of nine patients inadequately treated who died within 30 days, died before microbiological diagnosis. Our study provides real-life data on outcomes of elderly and multimorbid patients hospitalized for infections caused by NDM-Kp. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染通常会引起医院获得性感染。该研究旨在比较接受头孢他啶阿维巴坦+/-氨曲南和多粘菌素的患者在新德里Metalloβ内酰胺酶产生率高的医院环境中CRKP感染的结果。
    方法:我们于2020年1月至2022年9月在非COVID-19重症监护病房接受CRKP感染的危重成人患者中进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者共随访30天或死亡,无论后来。
    结果:本研究共纳入106例患者,65例患者接受多粘菌素治疗,41例患者接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦+/-氨曲南治疗。多粘菌素组的30天死亡率较高(56.9%vs.29.2%,P=0.005)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦+/-氨曲南的平均事件发生时间(死亡率)为23.9+1.5天,显著高于多粘菌素(17.9+1.2天,p=0.006)。关于Cox回归分析,在调整协变量后,使用多粘菌素发生事件的时间风险比为2.02(95%CI:1.03~3.9).
    结论:头孢他啶-阿维巴坦+氨曲南可能与CRKP感染患者更好的临床预后相关。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections commonly cause hospital-acquired infections. The study aimed to compare the outcomes of CRKP infections between patients receiving ceftazidime avibactam +/- aztreonam and polymyxins in a hospital setting with a high prevalence of New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamase production.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to September 2022 in critically ill adult patients admitted to a non-COVID-19 medical intensive care unit with CRKP infection. The patients were followed up for a total of 30 days or death, whichever was later.
    RESULTS: Of a total of 106 patients included in the study, 65 patients received polymyxins and 41 patients received ceftazidime-avibactam +/- aztreonam. Higher 30-day mortality was noted in the polymyxin group (56.9% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.005). The mean time to event (mortality) in ceftazidime-avibactam +/- aztreonam was 23.9 + 1.5 days which was significantly higher compared to polymyxins (17.9 + 1.2 days, p = 0.006). On Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for the covariates, the hazard ratio for time to event with the use of polymyxin was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.03-3.9).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam is possibly associated with better clinical outcomes in patients infected with CRKP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    氨曲南-阿维巴坦,eravacycline,和头孢瑟利是三种新型抗菌剂,用于治疗革兰氏阴性菌引起的严重感染。我们评估了上述三种抗微生物剂对临床肠杆菌分离株的体外活性。共有1,202株肠杆菌分离株,包括10个属或种,从覆盖中国七个地区的26家医院收集。根据美国食品和药物管理局和临床和实验室标准研究所指南的组合,对30种抗微生物剂的敏感性进行了解释。结果表明,肠杆菌对氨曲南-阿维巴坦的敏感性较高(98.25%),埃拉环素(85.69%),和塞福斯(62.73%)。前两种抗微生物剂还表现出针对多重耐药和碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌的有效活性,而与抗微生物耐药机制无关。氨曲南-阿维巴坦的敏感率,eravacycline,和头孢瑟利在摩根氏菌属中最低。(84.42%),变形杆菌。(33.65%),和大肠杆菌(40.14%),分别。总的来说,老年住院组患者对埃拉环素和头孢司利的敏感性较低.尿路分离菌株对埃拉环素的敏感率最低(78.97%),在神经系统标本中观察到对头孢瑟利的敏感性最低(45.83%)。与从非ICU病房分离的菌株相比,从重症监护病房(ICU)病房分离的菌株对头孢瑟利的易感性显着降低。氨曲南-阿维巴坦和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的MIC值一致性较差(加权κ=0.243),埃拉环素和替加环素也是如此(加权kappa=0.478)。头孢噻利和头孢吡肟对肠杆菌表现出高度相似的活性(加权κ=0.801)。我们的结果支持氨曲南-阿维巴坦的临床发展,eravacycline,和头孢瑟利治疗由肠杆菌引起的感染。重要性由多药耐药(MDR)肠杆菌引起的感染,尤其是耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE),由于治疗选择有限,一直是一个具有挑战性的临床问题。因此,迫切需要开发新的抗微生物剂并评估其体外抗肠杆菌的活性。我们的结果表明,新型抗菌剂氨曲南-阿维巴坦和埃拉环素保留了对MDR和CRE分离株的活性,包括碳青霉烯酶生产者和非碳青霉烯酶生产者。进一步分析结合所测试菌株的临床信息显示,具有不同人口统计学参数的菌株对氨曲南-阿维巴坦的敏感性没有显着差异。年龄,标本来源,和部门与菌株对埃拉环素和头孢瑟利的敏感性相关(P≤0.01)。与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦相比,氨曲南-阿维巴坦对肠杆菌有其优点和局限性。埃拉环素对肠杆菌的有效活性高于替加环素。头孢噻利和头孢吡肟对肠杆菌表现出高度一致的活性。
    Aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis are three novel antimicrobial agents for the treatment of serious infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria. We evaluated the in vitro activities of the above-mentioned three antimicrobial agents against clinical Enterobacterales isolates. A total of 1,202 Enterobacterales isolates, including 10 genera or species, were collected from 26 hospitals that cover seven regions of China. The susceptibilities of the 30 antimicrobial agents were interpreted based on the combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. The results indicated that all Enterobacterales isolates showed high susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam (98.25%), eravacycline (85.69%), and cefoselis (62.73%). The first two antimicrobial agents also demonstrated potent activities against multidrug-resistant and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales independent of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. The rates of susceptibility to aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis were lowest in Morganella spp. (84.42%), Proteus spp. (33.65%), and Escherichia coli (40.14%), respectively. In general, the lower rates of susceptibility to eravacycline and cefoselis were in the older inpatient group. The strains isolated from urinary tract exhibited the lowest rate of susceptibility (78.97%) to eravacycline, and the lowest rate of susceptibility (45.83%) to cefoselis was observed in nervous system specimens. The strains isolated from intensive care unit (ICU) wards showed significantly reduced susceptibility to cefoselis compared with those isolated from non-ICU wards. The MIC values of aztreonam-avibactam and ceftazidime-avibactam have poor consistency (weighted kappa = 0.243), as did eravacycline and tigecycline (weighted kappa = 0.478). Cefoselis and cefepime showed highly similar activities against Enterobacterales (weighted kappa = 0.801). Our results support the clinical development of aztreonam-avibactam, eravacycline, and cefoselis to treat infections caused by Enterobacterales. IMPORTANCE Infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales, especially carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), have been a challenging clinical problem due to the limited therapeutic options. Therefore, the need to develop novel antimicrobial agents and evaluate their activities against Enterobacterales in vitro is urgent. Our results show that the novel antimicrobial agents aztreonam-avibactam and eravacycline retain activities against MDR and CRE isolates, including carbapenemase producers and non-carbapenemase producers. Further analysis combined with clinical information on the strains tested revealed that no significant differences were observed in susceptibility rates of strains with different demographic parameters to aztreonam-avibactam. Age, specimen source, and department were associated with the susceptibility of strains to eravacycline and cefoselis (P ≤ 0.01). Compared with ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam has its advantages and limitations against Enterobacterales. The potent activity of eravacycline against Enterobacterales was higher than that of tigecycline. Cefoselis and cefepime showed a highly consistent activity against Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和氨曲南(ATM)联合用药的药代动力学(PK)数据很少,尚不清楚CZA-ATM是否会加剧丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)/天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)相对于单独ATM的升高。该阶段1研究试图描述CZA-ATM的PK并评估ATM暴露与ALT/AST升高之间的关联。受试者(n=48)被分配到六个队列中的一个(间歇性输注[II]CZA,连续输注[CI]CZA,IIATM,CIATM[每天8克],IICZA与IIATM[每天6克],和IICZA与IIATM[8克/天]),和研究产品施用7天。共有19名受试者(40%)有ALT/AST升高,大多数(89%)发生在ATM/CZA-ATM队列中.CIATM队列中的两名受试者经历了严重的ALT/AST升高,停止了研究。所有ALT/AST升高的受试者无症状,无其他肝损伤迹象,停止给药后,所有ALT/AST升高均无后遗症。在人口PK(PopPK)分析中,CZA-ATM管理将ATM总许可减少了16%,对头孢他啶的总清除率影响可忽略不计,并且在avibactamPopPK模型中不是协变量。在暴露反应分析中,CZA-ATM的共同给药未发现增加ALT/AST升高。在IIATM/CZA-ATM队列中的受试者分析中,观察到ATM暴露(血清中药物的最大浓度[Cmax]和浓度-时间曲线下面积[AUC])与ALT/AST升高之间的适度关联。研究结果表明,相对于单独的ATM,CZA-ATM的施用降低了ATM清除,但不加剧AST/ALT升高。结果还表明CIATM应谨慎使用。
    Scant pharmacokinetic (PK) data are available on ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam (ATM) in combination, and it is unknown if CZA-ATM exacerbates alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevations relative to ATM alone. This phase 1 study sought to describe the PK of CZA-ATM and assess the associations between ATM exposures and ALT/AST elevations. Subjects (n = 48) were assigned to one of six cohorts (intermittent infusion [II] CZA, continuous infusion [CI] CZA, II ATM, CI ATM [8 g/daily], II CZA with II ATM [6 g/daily], and II CZA with II ATM [8 g/daily]), and study product(s) were administered for 7 days. A total of 19 subjects (40%) had ALT/AST elevations, and most (89%) occurred in the ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the CI ATM cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevations, which halted the study. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other signs of liver injury, and all ALT/AST elevations resolved without sequalae after cessation of dosing. In the population PK (PopPK) analyses, CZA-ATM administration reduced total ATM clearance by 16%, had a negligible effect on total ceftazidime clearance, and was not a covariate in the avibactam PopPK model. In the exposure-response analyses, coadministration of CZA-ATM was not found to augment ALT/AST elevations. Modest associations were observed between ATM exposure (maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) and ALT/AST elevations in the analysis of subjects in the II ATM/CZA-ATM cohorts. The findings suggest that administration of CZA-ATM reduces ATM clearance but does not exacerbate AST/ALT elevations relative to ATM alone. The results also indicate that CI ATM should be used with caution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    这项I期研究评估了在产生MBL的肠杆菌的中空纤维感染模型中鉴定的最佳头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)与氨曲南(ATM)方案的安全性。年龄在18至45岁的合格健康受试者被分配到六个队列之一:每8小时2小时2.5gCZA(批准剂量),CZA连续输注(CI)(每天7.5g),2克ATM超过2小时每6小时,ATMCI(每天8克),CZA(批准剂量),每6小时在2小时内使用1.5gATM,和CZA(批准剂量),每6小时在2小时内具有2gATM。施用研究药物7天。最常见的不良事件(AE)是肝氨基转移酶(ALT/AST)升高(n=19名受试者)。ALT/AST升高的19名受试者中有17名单独接受ATM或CZA-ATM。ALT/AST升高的发生率在单独的ATM和CZA-ATM队列之间是相当的。ATMCI队列中的两名受试者经历了严重的ALT/AST升高AE。所有ALT/AST升高的受试者无症状,没有其他提示肝损伤的发现。大多数其他AE为轻度至中度严重程度,并且在队列中相似,除了延长凝血酶原时间(在CZA-ATM队列中更常见)。这些结果表明,CZA-ATM作为2小时间歇输注给药是安全的,并且应谨慎使用ATMCI,每天8g的ATM剂量。如果开CZA-ATM,建议临床医生监测肝功能,血液学,和凝血参数。需要未来的对照研究来更好地定义本I期研究中评估的CZA-ATM方案的安全性和有效性。
    This phase I study evaluated the safety of the optimal ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) with aztreonam (ATM) regimens identified in hollow fiber infection models of MBL-producing Enterobacterales. Eligible healthy subjects aged 18 to 45 years were assigned to one of six cohorts: 2.5 g CZA over 2 h every 8 h (approved dose), CZA continuous infusion (CI) (7.5 g daily), 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, ATM CI (8 g daily), CZA (approved dose) with 1.5 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h, and CZA (approved dose) with 2 g ATM over 2 h every 6 h. Study drug(s) were administered for 7 days. The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs) were hepatic aminotransferase (ALT/AST) elevations (n = 19 subjects). Seventeen of the 19 subjects with ALT/AST elevations received ATM alone or CZA-ATM. The incidence of ALT/AST elevations was comparable between the ATM-alone and CZA-ATM cohorts. Two subjects in the ATM CI cohort experienced severe ALT/AST elevation AEs. All subjects with ALT/AST elevations were asymptomatic with no other findings suggestive of liver injury. Most other AEs were of mild to moderate severity and were similar across cohorts, except for prolonged prothrombin time (more frequent in CZA-ATM cohorts). These results suggest that CZA-ATM administered as 2-h intermittent infusions is safe and that some caution should be exercised with the use of ATM CI at an ATM dose of 8 g daily. If CZA-ATM is prescribed, clinicians are advised to monitor liver function, hematologic, and coagulation parameters. Future controlled studies are required to better define the safety and efficacy of the CZA-ATM regimens evaluated in this phase I study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号