As the incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) has been increasing, and has shown young trend. It is crucial to study the fertility-preserving treatment of endometrial lesions and fertility-promoting protocols. Age, obesity, and irregular ovulation are not only high-risk factors for endometrial lesions but also key factors affecting female fertility. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) can significantly improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with AEH and EC after conservative treatment. Based on the existing studies, this article reviews the progress of research on pregnancy outcomes of ART and its influencing factors in such patients. It helps physicians in providing optimal fertility guidance.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes of fertility-preserving re-treatment in progestin-resistant endometrial carcinoma (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) women who desire to maintain their fertility.
METHODS: Our study included 61 progestin-resistant EC/AEH patients. These patients underwent treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) solely or a combination of GnRHa with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUD) or aromatase inhibitor (AI). Histological evaluations were performed every 3-4 months. Upon achieving complete remission (CR), we recommended maintenance treatments including LNG-IUD, cyclical oral contraceptives, or low-dose cyclic progestin until they began attempting conception. Regular follow-up was conducted for all patients. The chi-square method was utilized to compare oncological and fertility outcomes, while the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis helped identify risk factors for CR, recurrence, and pregnancy.
RESULTS: Overall, 55 (90.2%) patients achieved CR, including 90.9% of AEH patients and 89.7% of EC patients. The median re-treatment time was 6 months (ranging from 3 to 12 months). The CR rate for GnRHa alone, GnRHa + LNG-IUD and GnRHa + AI were 80.0%, 91.7% and 93.3%, respectively. After a median follow-up period of 36 months (ranging from 3 to 96 months), 19 women (34.5%) experienced recurrence, 40.0% in AEH and 31.4% in EC patients, with the median recurrence time of 23 months (ranging from 6 to 77 months). Among the patients who achieved CR, 39 expressed a desire to conceive, 20 (51.3%) became pregnant, 11 (28.2%) had successfully deliveries, 1 (5.1%) was still pregnant, while 8 (20.5%) suffered miscarriages.
CONCLUSIONS: GnRHa-based fertility-sparing treatment exhibited promising oncological and reproductive outcomes for progestin-resistant patients. Future larger multi-institutional studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Disparities in endometrial cancer has increased during the past decade with Black women more likely to be diagnosed at a later stage and have higher mortality. The majority of research has been focused on cultural barriers, socioeconomic status, lack of access to care, comorbidities, and tumor histology to explain these disparities. Limited studies have been conducted on the disparity in the treatment of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia(EIN). We sought to analyze the differences in treatment used in the management of postmenopausal women with EIN to evaluate whether race/ethnicity is a contributing factor. An IRB approved retrospective study was conducted amongst women at a single institution diagnosed with EIN. Ethnicity/race was defined as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Asian. Demographic and clinical data was extracted. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between ethnicity/race and treatment, adjusted for age, BMI, and underlying medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. In total, 254 patients were analyzed. A significant association between ethnicity/race and treatment with non-Hispanic Black women less likely to be treated with surgical management compared to non-Hispanic White women (OR = 0.326, 95 %CI 0.129-0.827, p = 0.026). Importantly, after adjusting for clinical risk factors(age, BMI, CVD, diabetes), non-Hispanic Black women remained at an increased risk of not undergoing surgical intervention (OR = 0.333, 95 % CI 0.125-0.882, p = 0.027). Future research is imperative to evaluate the root cause of this disparity in the healthcare system.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative pathological escalation of endometrial cancer in patients with a pathologic diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) before surgery. Some of the clues from the preoperative assessment were used to build a nomogram to predict the likely pathological escalation after surgery, and to explore the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy in these patients with possible pathological escalation.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical treatment for EIN diagnosed before surgery between 2018 and 2023 in The Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. parameters including clinical, radiological and histopathological factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression to determine the correlation with pathology upstaging. A nomogram based on the multivariate results was developed to predict the probability of pathology upstaging. A total of 729 patients were included, divided into training set and validation set. 484 patients were used to build the model. This nomogram was subsequently validated using 245 patients.
RESULTS: Upstaging to endometrial carcinoma occurred in 115 (23.8 percent) of 484 women treated between 2018 and 2023 in training set. A lager endometrial thickness (at least 15 mm), menopause, hypertension, HE4, and endometrial blood were significantly associated with upstaging. A nomogram developed using these factors demonstrated good predictive performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.6808; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.6246-0.7369). The nomogram showed similar predictive performance in the validation data set, based on another 245 women (AUC=0.7821; 95% CI=0.7076-0.8567).
CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a novel nomogram based on the 5 most important factors, which can accurately predict invasive cancer. It is common for women with preoperative diagnosis of EIN to experience pathological progression to endometrial cancer. For some patients with postoperative pathological escalation, we found lymph node metastasis. This nomogram may be useful to help doctor decide whether to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy for surgical staging in these EIN patients. According to the nomogram, simultaneous sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with high probability of postoperative pathological upgrading can provide better guidance for postoperative adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer and avoid the occurrence of secondary surgery.

UNASSIGNED: The medical and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is evolving toward a more patient-centered and personalized approach. The role of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early-stage EC is unclear, and very few data are available for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The present study investigated the effectiveness of SNB combined with laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with early-stage EC and AEH.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study for the period from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 102 patients with atypical hyperplasia (n = 20) and early-stage EC (n = 82) findings on diagnostic curettage underwent pelvic sentinel node biopsy during the final operation.
UNASSIGNED: Eleven patients (55%) who had initially been diagnosed with AEH were found to have EC in the final pathology report. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients who had initially been diagnosed with AEH; a 3.6% rate of positive SNBs was found in patients with EC. Changes in tumor grade occurred in 31.3% of the patients and changes in FIGO stage in 33%. Bilateral sentinel node (SN) mapping was successful in 94.1% of the patients. The postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of routine clinical practice without SNB.
UNASSIGNED: SNB can be safely offered to patients who have precursor lesions and early-stage EC without notably extending surgical times or increasing postoperative morbidity. This approach can be considered and is safe for patients diagnosed with AEH, but it appears to have a rather small impact on these patients.
UNASSIGNED: Die medizinisch-chirurgische Behandlung des Endometriumkarzinoms (EK) verändert sich hin zu einer mehr patientenorientierten und personalisierten Vorgehensweise. Die Rolle der laparoskopisch durchgeführten Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Biopsie (SNB) bei EK im Frühstadium ist noch unklar, und es gibt nur wenige Daten zur atypischen Endometriumhyperplasie (AEH). Die vorliegende Studie untersuchte die Effektivität von SNB in Kombination mit einer laparoskopischen Hysterektomie bei Patientinnen mit EK im Frühstadium und AEH.
UNASSIGNED: Es handelt sich um eine retrospektive monozentrische Kohortenstudie, die zwischen Januar 2018 bis Dezember 2023 durchgeführt wurde. Insgesamt erhielten 102 Patientinnen mit dem Befund der atypischen Hyperplasie (n = 20) und EK im Frühstadium (n = 82) nach diagnostischer Abrasio während der endgültigen Operation eine Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Biopsie.
UNASSIGNED: Bei 11 Patientinnen (55%), die ursprünglich mit AEH diagnostiziert wurden, wurde gemäß dem abschließenden Pathologiebericht ein EK identifiziert. Es wurden keine Lymphknotenmetastasen bei Patientinnen gefunden, deren ursprüngliche Diagnose AEH lautete; die Rate der positiven SNB bei Patientinnen mit EK betrug 3,6%. Bei 31,3% der Patientinnen kam es zu einer Veränderung des Tumorgrads und bei 33% zu einer Änderung des FIGO-Stadiums. Das bilaterale Sentinel-Lymphknoten-Mapping war bei 94,1% der Patientinnen erfolgreich. Die postoperativen Ergebnisse aller Patientinnen waren mit denen eines routinemäßigen chirurgischen Eingriffs ohne Durchführung einer SNB vergleichbar.
UNASSIGNED: Die SNB kann problemlos bei Patientinnen mit Vorläuferläsionen und EK im Frühstadium durchgeführt werden, ohne dass sich die Operationszeit wesentlich verlängert oder sich die postoperative Morbidität erhöht. Während diese Vorgehensweise für Patientinnen mit einer Diagnose von AEH als sicher betrachtet werden kann und ist, scheint sie nur geringe Auswirkungen auf diese Patientinnen zu haben.

BACKGROUND: Fertility preserving therapy using medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is an important option for young patients with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). However, the effectiveness and feasibility of repeated MPA therapy for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy is controversial. Only a few single-institution retrospective studies have been conducted on repeated MPA therapy, therefore, multicenter prospective studies for repeated MPA therapy are highly needed. The aim of this study is to assess whether repeated MPA therapy is effective and feasible for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy.
METHODS: This is a prospective, single-arm, a multicenter phase II trial on repeated MPA therapy for intrauterine recurrence following fertility-preserving therapy for AEH or stage IA (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2008) non-myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma grade 1. Patients are treated with oral MPA (500-600 mg/day). Pathologically assessment via dilation and curettage will be performed every 2 months until complete response. The major inclusion criteria are 1) intrauterine recurrence of AEH or stage IA (FIGO 2008) endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 without myometrial invasion or extrauterine spread confirmed by imaging tests after complete remission with the previous MPA therapy. 2) The number of recurrences should be up to twice. 3) histologically diagnosed as AEH or endometrioid carcinoma grade 1, 4) 20-42 years of age, and 5) strong desire and consent for fertility-sparing treatment. The primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival rate. A total of 115 patients will be enrolled from multiple institutions in Japan and Korea within 4 years and followed up for 2 years.
BACKGROUND: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs031200256.

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this network meta-analysis is to systematically compare the efficacy of diverse progestin-based combination regimens in treating patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The primary goal is to discern the optimal combination treatment regimen through a comprehensive examination of their respective effectiveness.
UNASSIGNED: We systematically searched four prominent databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for randomized controlled trials addressing the efficacy of progestins or progestin combinations in the treatment of patients with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The search spanned from the inception of these databases to December 2023. Key outcome indicators encompassed survival indices, criteria for assessing efficacy, as well as pregnancy and relapse rate. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024496311).
UNASSIGNED: From the 1,558 articles initially retrieved, we included 27 studies involving a total of 5,323 subjects in our analysis. The results of the network meta-analysis revealed that the mTOR inhibitor+megestrol acetate (MA)+tamoxifen regimen secured the top rank in maintaining stable disease (SD) (SUCRA=73.4%) and extending progression-free survival (PFS) (SUCRA=72.4%). Additionally, the progestin combined with tamoxifen regimen claimed the leading position in enhancing the partial response (PR) (SUCRA=75.2%) and prolonging overall survival (OS) (SUCRA=80%). The LNG-IUS-based dual progestin regimen emerged as the frontrunner in improving the complete response (CR) (SUCRA=98.7%), objective response rate (ORR) (SUCRA=99.1%), pregnancy rate (SUCRA=83.7%), and mitigating progression (SUCRA=8.0%) and relapse rate (SUCRA=47.4%). In terms of safety, The LNG-IUS-based dual progestin regimen had the lowest likelihood of adverse events (SUCRA=4.2%), while the mTOR inhibitor regimen (SUCRA=89.2%) and mTOR inbitor+MA+tamoxifen regimen (SUCRA=88.4%) had the highest likelihood of adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia exhibited the most favorable prognosis when undergoing progestin combination therapy that included tamoxifen, mTOR inhibitor, or LNG-IUS. Notably, among these options, the LNG-IUS-based dual progestin regimen emerged as particularly promising for potential application.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024496311.

The hyperplasia-carcinoma sequence is a stepwise tumourigenic programme towards endometrial cancer in which normal endometrial epithelium becomes neoplastic through non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NAEH) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), under the influence of unopposed oestrogen. NAEH and AEH are known to exhibit polyclonal and monoclonal cell growth, respectively; yet, aside from focal PTEN protein loss, the genetic and epigenetic alterations that occur during the cellular transition remain largely unknown. We sought to explore the potential molecular mechanisms that promote the NAEH-AEH transition and identify molecular markers that could help to differentiate between these two states. We conducted target-panel sequencing on the coding exons of 596 genes, including 96 endometrial cancer driver genes, and DNA methylome microarrays for 48 NAEH and 44 AEH lesions that were separately collected via macro- or micro-dissection from the endometrial tissues of 30 cases. Sequencing analyses revealed acquisition of the PTEN mutation and the clonal expansion of tumour cells in AEH samples. Further, across the transition, alterations to the DNA methylome were characterised by hypermethylation of promoter/enhancer regions and CpG islands, as well as hypo- and hyper-methylation of DNA-binding regions for transcription factors relevant to endometrial cell differentiation and/or tumourigenesis, including FOXA2, SOX17, and HAND2. The identified DNA methylation signature distinguishing NAEH and AEH lesions was reproducible in a validation cohort with modest discriminative capability. These findings not only support the concept that the transition from NAEH to AEH is an essential step within neoplastic cell transformation of endometrial epithelium but also provide deep insight into the molecular mechanism of the tumourigenic programme. © 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

An observational cohort study of patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC) stage IA G1, or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), undergoing organ-preserving treatment, was conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To determine CDO1, PITX2, and CDH13 gene methylation levels in early endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia specimens obtained before organ-preserving treatment in the patients with adequate response and with insufficient response to hormonal treatment.
METHODS: A total of 41 endometrial specimens obtained during diagnostic uterine curettage in women with EC (n = 28) and AEH (n = 13), willing to preserve reproductive function, were studied; 18 specimens of uterine cancer IA stage G1 from peri- and early postmenopausal women (comparison group) were included in the study. The control group included 18 endometrial specimens from healthy women obtained by diagnostic curettage for missed abortion and/or intrauterine adhesions. Methylation levels were analyzed using the modified MS-HRM method.
RESULTS: All 13 women with AEH had a complete response (CR) to medical treatment. In the group undergoing organ-preserving treatment for uterine cancer IA stage G1 (n = 28), 14 patients had a complete response (EC CR group) and 14 did not (EC non-CR group). It was found that all groups had statistically significant differences in CDO1 gene methylation levels compared to the control group (p < 0.001) except for the EC CR group (p = 0.21). The p-value for the difference between EC CR and EC non-CR groups was <0.001. The differences in PITX2 gene methylation levels between the control and study groups were also significantly different (p < 0.001), except for the AEH group (p = 0.21). For the difference between EC CR and EC non-CR groups, the p-value was 0.43. For CDH13 gene methylation levels, statistically significant differences were found between the control and EC non-CR groups (p < 0.001), and the control and EC comparison groups (p = 0.005). When comparing the EC CR group with EC non-CR group, the p-value for this gene was <0.001. The simultaneous assessment of CDO1 and CDH13 genes methylation allowed for an accurate distinction between EC CR and EC non-CR groups (AUC = 0.96).
CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of CDO1 and CDH13 gene methylation in endometrial specimens from patients with endometrial cancer (IA stage G1), scheduled for medical treatment, can predict the treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is a common troublesome symptom in the perimenopausal age group. The most common type of AUB in this age group is heavy menstrual bleeding. There is a risk of endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in women with AUB in the age group of 40-50 years. Hence early evaluation is of paramount importance in managing women with perimenopausal heavy menstrual bleeding. The current study was undertaken to study the correlation between ultrasound findings and various benign and malignant endometrial histologies in perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding.
METHODS: Women aged 40-55 years presenting with heavy menstrual bleeding at the gynaecology outpatient department at Sree Balaji Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India, were included in the study. Patients on anti-platelet and anti-coagulation therapy and patients already on hormonal treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding were excluded from the study. The demographic factors, symptom profiles, ultrasound findings, and histopathological reports were tabulated and analysed.
RESULTS: Of the 147 women included in the study, 75 (51%) were aged 45-50 years and 107 (73%) had two or more pregnancies. Fibroid was the common non-endometrial cause of heavy menstrual bleeding in 52 (35%) cases. The proliferative pattern was the most common non-pathological histology identified in 46 (31%) cases. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia was the most common pathological histology observed in the study population. Endometrial thickness of more than 8 mm was strongly associated with premalignant or malignant endometrial lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study has attempted to identify the correlation between ultrasound evaluation of perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and endometrial pathology. Ultrasound, being cost-effective and widely available, is proven to be a tool for first-line investigation of perimenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding that guides further evaluation and management.