Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (vEDS) is an inherited connective tissue disorder caused by COL3A1 gene, mutations that encodes type III collagen, a crucial component of blood vessels. vEDS can be life-threatening as these patients can have severe internal bleeding due to arterial rupture. Here, we generated induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from two vEDS patients carrying a missense mutation in the COL3A1 (c.226A > G, p.Asn76Asp) gene. These lines exhibited typical iPSC characteristics including morphology, expression of pluripotency markers, and could differentiate to all three germ layer. These iPSC lines can serve as valuable tools for elucidating the pathophysiology underlying vEDS.

BACKGROUND: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a hereditary collagen vascular disorder characterized by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility, and tissue fragility. Vascular EDS (vEDS) is a subtype of EDS which is characterized by vascular fragility.
METHODS: This is a case report of a young man with vEDS hospitalized for myocardial infarction. He was presented with a coronary dissection and developed aortic dissection, coronary rupture, and cardiac tamponade until death.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights how patients with vEDS and acute coronary syndrome show a higher risk of vascular complications compared with other patients, and their admission to the institution with a cardiac surgery room could be helpful and safe for better management of the complications. Non-invasive methods could be useful to exclude other vascular diseases, before the emergency coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Engaging patients living with or at risk of aortic dissection via the Aortic Dissection Collaborative, physician education in vascular genetics was identified as a research priority. We surveyed vascular surgeons to characterize practice patterns, motivations, and barriers regarding aortopathy genetic testing.
METHODS: An anonymous 27-question survey was distributed on social media platforms between November and December 2022. Domains included demographics, vascular genetic education, testing attitudes and utilization, and experience in treating patients with genetic vascular aortopathies. The analysis included summary statistics and unpaired t-test to compare responses by interest in incorporating testing and practice type.
RESULTS: A total of 171 vascular surgeons from 15 countries responded to the survey (23% trainees). Over half received vascular genetics education during training (59%), and most (86%) were interested in incorporating genetic testing into their practice. Academic surgeons were more likely to have cared for a patient with a known genetic aortopathy over the past year than surgeons in hospital-based and private practices (83% vs. 56% vs. 27%; P < 0.01), to have ever made a referral to a medical geneticist (78% vs. 51% vs. 9%; P < 0.01), and have access to genetic counselors or geneticists (66% vs. 46% vs. 0%; P < 0.01). Barriers to genetic testing were rated as more significant by surgeons in nonacademic practices, with top barriers being insurance coverage of testing, cost of genetic testing, and access to genetic counselors. Evidence-based professional society guidelines were the strongest rated motivating factor for testing incorporation among respondents.
CONCLUSIONS: Vascular surgeon attitudes are not major barriers to incorporating genetic testing for patients with aortopathies; however, practical challenges regarding genetic testing and counseling are barriers to implementation especially for vascular surgeons in nonacademic practices. Future efforts should focus on evidence-based society guidelines, continuing medical education to increase adoption, and facilitating access to genetic counseling.

BACKGROUND: Isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) is a rare entity with poorly defined risk factors and wide variation in management. We set forth to compare patient characteristics, management, and outcomes of uncomplicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (uIAAD) versus high risk and complicated isolated abdominal aortic dissection (hrcIAAD) to investigate whether these categories can be utilized to guide IAAD management and provide risk stratification for intervention.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients with spontaneous IAAD at a tertiary health care system between 1996 and 2022. Demographics, comorbidities, factors relating to initial presentation including imaging findings, and dissection outcomes including long-term all-cause mortality and aortic-related mortality from time of dissection to final available record were abstracted. IAAD demonstrating rupture or malperfusion were designated as complicated, those with aortic diameter greater than 4 cm on presentation or refractory pain were designated as high risk, and the remainder was designated as uIAAD. All variables were compared between hrcIAAD and uIAAD using Fisher\'s exact test, unpaired t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate.
RESULTS: Over the study period, 74 patients presented with spontaneous IAAD (mean age 60 ± 16 years, 61% male) with postdissection follow-up records to an average of 6.8 ± 5.8 years. Of these, 76% presented with uIAAD versus 24% with hrcIAAD. hrcIAAD was diagnosed at a significantly younger age on average than uIAAD (52 ± 14 vs. 62 ± 16 years, P = 0.02), was less likely to present with concomitant hyperlipidemia (0% vs. 41%, P < 0.01), coronary artery disease (6% vs. 47%, P < 0.01), and prior smoking history (39% vs. 72%). hrcIAAD was more likely to present in patients with a genetic aortopathy (27% vs. 7%, P = 0.03). Hypertension was not significantly different between groups. Patients with hrcIAAD were significantly more likely to present with extension into iliac arteries compared to uIAAD (61% vs. 18%, P < 0.01). A much higher proportion of hrcIAAD required hospitalization compared to uIAAD (83% vs. 30%, P < 0.01) and operative intervention (67% vs. 7%, P < 0.01). While there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between groups, there was a significant difference between aortic-related mortality which only occurred in those with hrcIAAD (28% vs. 0%, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of long-term outcomes suggests that hrcIAAD is associated with increased hospitalization and need for operative intervention compared to uIAAD. Significant differences in atherosclerotic risk factors and proportions of connective tissue disease history between patients who present with hrcIAAD and uIAAD suggest that differences in underlying etiology are largely responsible for whether IAAD progresses towards rupture or has a more benign course and should be considered in risk stratification to guide more specific and targeted management of IAAD.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is associated with an increased risk of late aortic reoperations due to degeneration of the dissected aorta.
METHODS: The subjects of this analysis were 990 TAAD patients who survived surgery for acute TAAD and had complete data on the diameter and dissection status of all aortic segments.
RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.6 years, 60 patients underwent 85 distal aortic reoperations. Ten-year cumulative incidence of distal aortic reoperation was 9.6%. Multivariable competing risk analysis showed that the maximum preoperative diameter of the abdominal aorta (SHR 1.041, 95%CI 1.008-1.075), abdominal aorta dissection (SHR 2.133, 95%CI 1.156-3.937) and genetic syndromes (SHR 2.840, 95%CI 1.001-8.060) were independent predictors of distal aortic reoperation. Patients with a maximum diameter of the abdominal aorta >30 mm and/or abdominal aortic dissection had a cumulative incidence of 10-year distal aortic reoperation of 12.0% compared to 5.7% in those without these risk factors (adjusted SHR 2.076, 95%CI 1.062-4.060).
CONCLUSIONS: TAAD patients with genetic syndromes, and increased size and dissection of the abdominal aorta have an increased the risk of distal aortic reoperations. A policy of extensive surgical or hybrid primary aortic repair, completion endovascular procedures for aortic remodeling and tight surveillance may be justified in these patients.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04831073.

A 28-year-old male with history of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (VEDS) presented with left lower extremity acute limb ischemia. Computed tomography angiography demonstrated spontaneous dissection of the left common iliac artery with occlusion and associated contained rupture . Successful stent placement without associated complications was achieved with the following principles: (1) open arterial exposure for endovascular intervention; (2) no touch technique vessel dissection; (3) circumferential proximal arterial felt cuff reinforcement to reduce systolic pulse wave stretch on sutures, and in case of emergent ligation; and (4) pledgetted \"preclose U\" stitch monofilament suture prior to access.

This report describes a unique case of vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) characterized by multiple spontaneous direct carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas (CCF). The patient initially presented with ocular symptoms and was effectively treated with transarterial coil embolization. Five years later, the patient developed recurrent contralateral CCF that required complex endovascular techniques. Genetic testing identified a novel mutation in the COL3A1 gene, confirming the diagnosis of vEDS. This case report provides a near-term perspective on the identification of structural abnormalities in the COL3A1 protein to ensure the safety of endovascular therapy for patients with vEDS.

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is a severe connective tissue disorder caused by dominant mutations in the COL3A1 gene encoding type III collagen (COLLIII). COLLIII is primarily found in blood vessels and hollow organs, and its deficiency leads to soft connective tissues fragility, resulting in life-threatening arterial and organ ruptures. There are no current targeted therapies available. Although the disease usually results from COLLIII misfolding due to triple helix structure disruption, the underlying pathomechanisms are largely unknown. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a comprehensive transcriptome analysis using RNA- and miRNA-seq on a large cohort of dermal fibroblasts from vEDS patients and healthy donors. Our investigation revealed an intricate interplay between proteostasis abnormalities, inefficient endoplasmic reticulum stress response, and compromised autophagy, which may significantly impact the molecular pathology. We also present the first detailed miRNAs expression profile in patient cells, demonstrating that several aberrantly expressed miRNAs can disrupt critical cellular functions involved in vEDS pathophysiology, such as autophagy, proteostasis, and mTOR signaling. Target prediction and regulatory networks analyses suggested potential interactions among miRNAs, lncRNAs, and candidate target genes linked to extracellular matrix organization and autophagy-lysosome pathway. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the functional role of ncRNAs in vEDS pathogenesis, shedding light on possible miRNAs and lncRNAs signatures and their functional implications for dysregulated pathways related to disease. Deciphering this complex molecular network of RNA interactions may yield additional evidence for potential disease biomolecules and targets, assisting in the design of effective patient treatment strategies.

Background: Vascular-type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is caused by collagen III deficit resulting from heterogeneous mutations in COL3A1, which occasionally causes sudden death due to arterial/visceral rupture. However, it is difficult to conduct basic research on the pathophysiology of vEDS. Moreover, the number of patients with vEDS is small, limiting the number of available samples. Furthermore, the symptoms of vEDS may vary among family members, even if they share the same mutation. Accordingly, many aspects of the pathology of vEDS remain unknown. Therefore, we investigated the structural abnormalities in collagen fibrils and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in skin samples using electron microscopy as well as their relationship with clinical symptoms in 30 patients with vEDS (vEDS group) and 48 patients without vEDS (disease-negative control group). Methods: Differences between the two groups were evaluated in terms of the sizes of collagen fibrils using coefficient of variation (COV). Results: COV was found to be significantly higher in the vEDS group than in the disease-negative control group, indicating irregularity in the size of collagen fibrils. However, in the vEDS group, some patients had low COV and seldom experienced serious complications and ER stress. Conclusion: ER stress might affect collagen fibril-composing proteins. Moreover, as this stress varies among people based on environmental factors and aging, it may be the underlying cause of varying vEDS symptoms.

Vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS) is an autosomal dominant disease caused by aberrations in COL3A1, which encodes type III collagen. Sanger sequencing has limitations for diagnosis since exon deletion/duplication and splicing alterations are not uncommon in COL3A1. We report 2 patients with vEDS who were not diagnosed by conventional Sanger sequencing.
We performed either targeted panel or whole-genome sequencing. Complementary DNA (cDNA) sequencing was performed using cultured skin fibroblasts. Sanger sequencing of DNA was performed for the confirmation of breakpoints in the case of exon deletion. We also evaluated the sensitivity of the splicing prediction tool, SpliceAI.
An exon 27 deletion was suspected on targeted panel sequencing of 1 patient. The deletion was confirmed using cDNA sequencing (r.1870_1923del) and breakpoints were confirmed (c.1870-109_1923+10del). On targeted panel sequencing in the other patient, we found a novel intronic variant of c.1149+6T>C that leads to skipping of exon 16 (r.1051_1149del) by cDNA sequencing. SpliceAI showed 98.8% sensitivity for known splicing variants in COL3A1.
Our study highlights the necessity of a comprehensive approach to the genetic diagnosis of vEDS. In addition, cDNA sequencing was useful as an auxiliary method, especially considering the limited sensitivity of the splicing prediction tool.